Next Article in Journal
Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Canine and Feline Urinary Tract Infection Pathogens Isolated from Animals with Clinical Signs in European Veterinary Practices during the Period 2013–2018
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of National Activities on Antibiotic Consumption in Hospitals and Different Departments over a 14-Year Period
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antifungal Activity of Aniba canelilla (Kunth) Mez Essential Oil and Its Main Compound 1-Nitro-2-Phenylethane against Dermatophytes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Combination of Chromatographic Analysis and Chemometric Methods with Bioactivity Evaluation of the Antibacterial Properties of Helichrysum italicum Essential Oil

1
Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
2
Faculty of Technology, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
3
Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
4
National Poison Control Centre, Military Medical Academy, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
5
Faculty of Medicine of the Military Medical Academy, University of Defense, 11042 Belgrade, Serbia
6
Institute of General and Physical Chemistry, University of Belgrade, 11158 Belgrade, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2024, 13(6), 499; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13060499
Submission received: 20 April 2024 / Revised: 27 May 2024 / Accepted: 27 May 2024 / Published: 28 May 2024

Abstract

:
Helichrysum italicum (immortelle) essential oil is one of the most popular essential oils worldwide and it has many beneficial properties, including antimicrobial. However, in this plant, the chemical diversity of the essential oil is very pronounced. The aim of this work was to process the GC-MS results of four samples of H. italicum essential oil of Serbian origin by chemometric tools, and evaluate the antimicrobial activity in vitro and in silico. Overall, 47 compounds were identified, the most abundant were γ-curcumene, α-pinene, and ar-curcumene, followed by α-ylangene, neryl acetate, trans-caryophyllene, italicene, α-selinene, limonene, and italidiones. Although the four samples of H. italicum essential oil used in this study were obtained from different producers in Serbia, they belong to the type of essential oil rich in sesquiterpenes (γ-curcumene and ar-curcumene chemotype). In vitro antimicrobial potential showed that five were sensitive among ten strains of tested microorganisms: Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Bacillus cereus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Candida albicans. Therefore, these microorganism models were used further for in silico molecular docking through the mechanism of ATP-ase inhibitory activity. Results showed that among all compounds from H. italicum essential oil, neryl acetate has the highest predicted binding energy. Artificial neural network modeling (ANN) showed that two major compounds γ-curcumene and α-pinene, as well as minor compounds such as trans-β-ocimene, terpinolene, terpinene-4-ol, isoitalicene, italicene, cis-α-bergamotene, trans-α-bergamotene, italidiones, trans-β-farnesene, γ-selinene, β-selinene, α-selinene, and guaiol are responsible for the antimicrobial activity of H. italicum essential oil. The results of this study indicate that H. italicum essential oil samples rich in γ-curcumene, α-pinene, and ar-curcumene cultivated in Serbia (Balkan) have antimicrobial potential both in vitro and in silico. In addition, according to ANN modeling, the proportion of neryl acetate and other compounds detected in these samples has the potential to exhibit antimicrobial activity.

1. Introduction

Essential oils, as a mixture of liposoluble volatile organic compounds, are characterized by a specific fragrance and numerous biological activities [1]. Interest in their use as natural sources of antioxidant and antimicrobial agents is constantly growing [2,3]. As alternative sources of antimicrobials, essential oils are used as preservations in food [4,5,6], cosmetics [7,8], and pharmaceutics [9,10]. Additionally, they are very important as flavoring agents [11]. Moreover, over the last two decades, essential oils have become popular in aromatherapy [12,13]. In agricultural practice, essential oils are used as biopesticides, for controlling plant pathogens and weeds [14,15], and in storages as fumigants and germination inhibitors suitable for organic production [16,17]. All these characteristics indicate that essential oils are versatile with a wide range of biological activity, and possess multipurpose applications.
Helichrysum italicum or immortelle essential oil is popular worldwide because of its many properties, such as antimicrobial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticarcinogenic, antidiabetic, and insecticidal [18,19]. Essential oil is obtained mainly by steam distillation of aboveground flowering parts of wild-growing or cultivated plants [20]. Considering the limited area in the natural distribution of H. italicum (Mediterranean and southeastern Europe), cultivation has been extended to continental Europe, mainly the Balkan Peninsula [21,22,23]. Due to the large number of subspecies and genotypes, together with the influence of environmental conditions, climate, and soil type, there is a significant variation in the essential oil quality [24,25,26]. Although H. italicum essential oil is highly valued, there is no official quality assessment standard. However, there are two main types of H. italicum essential oil on the market: Corsica (rich in oxygenated monoterpenes, especially neryl acetate) and Balkan (with dominant sesquiterpenes γ-curcumene and ar-curcumene and monoterpene α-pinene) [27]. The Corsica type of oil has been favored in the perfumery and cosmetic industry, while the Balkan type of quality has appeared during the last two decades with the expansion of H. italicum cultivation outside its native distribution range, on the continental territory of the Balkan Peninsula [28,29].
It is a well-known fact that the biological activity of this essential oil depends on its chemical composition [30,31,32]. As the polymorphism within the H. italicum species is very pronounced, and there is no official standard for quality assessment, it is essential to determine which components from the essential oil of H. italicum are responsible for its bioactivity. Previous research conducted with different commercial samples of H. italicum essential oil indicated that the antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities of the oil are linked with major and minor constituents, as well as their synergistic activity [33].
This study aimed to evaluate the chemical composition of four samples of H. italicum essential oil obtained from agricultural producers in Serbia, which grow this plant on a large scale and have their own distillation units. Additionally, to predict the efficiency of the essential oil compounds responsible for the antimicrobial activity, the following tasks were performed: assessment of the antimicrobial activity in vitro using the disk diffusion method and ten ATCC strains; in silico molecular modeling simulations using histidine kinase as antimicrobial target molecules; and modeling by applying an artificial neural network.

2. Results

2.1. Chemical Composition

Overall, 47 compounds were identified in H. italicum essential oil samples from Serbia, accounting for 93.04 and 97.13% of the whole essential oil composition (Table 1). The most abundant compounds were γ-curcumene (13.11–19.98%), α-pinene (9.75–14.45%), and ar-curcumene (5.8–14.0%), followed by α-ylangene (3.53–9.84%), neryl acetate (3.10–9.38%), trans-caryophyllene (3.59–6.00%), italicene (3.42–5.01%), α-selinene (2.61–5.72%), and limonene (1.96–5.29%).
In all four samples of the essential oil of H. italicum, the dominance of sesquiterpenes is noticeable (55.14–66.68%). The second group in terms of representation was monoterpenes (16.82–26.00%), followed by esters (4.42–12.42) and ketones (5.05–7.50%). A class of compounds known as italidiones, β-diketones specific for H. italicum, was also present in the samples, and their mass spectra are shown in Figure 1.
The cluster analysis revealed two clusters: the first cluster includes samples 3 and 4, while the second encompasses samples 1 and 2 (Figure 2). The gained linkage distance between these clusters reached the value of almost 47. In summary, all four tested samples of H. italicum essential oils from Serbia belong to the typical Balkan type of oil, which is rich in γ-curcumene (between 13.11 and 19.8%). However, samples 1 and 2 are close to the Corsican type with slightly higher percentage of neryl acetate (7.42–9.38%), compared to its content in samples 3 and 4, (3.10–3.45%). Moreover, samples 3 and 4 contain significantly more ar-curcumene (11.74–14.40%) in comparison to samples 1 and 2 (5.91–9.08%).

2.2. Antimicrobial Potential of H. italicum Essential Oils

Table 2 provides insight into the antimicrobial potential of H. italicum essential oil against different microorganisms, measured by inhibition zones in millimeters. The data include bacterial, yeast, and fungal strains. In brief, S. aureus showed sensitivity to all four essential oil samples with varying inhibition zones. Sample 3 exhibited the highest activity (19.67 mm), followed by sample 1 (17.67 mm), sample 2 (12.00 mm), and sample 4 (10.00 mm). On the other hand, B. cereus responded to three H. italicum essential oil samples, but an antimicrobial effect was absent for sample 2. L. monocytogenes showed sensitivity to all samples, with sample 3 showing the highest activity (17.00 mm). Escherichia coli, P. aeruginosa, and S. Typhimurium showed no response to any of the samples.
As yeast representatives, S. cerevisiae and C. albicans showed zones of inhibition for all samples, with sample 2 displaying the highest activity against S. cerevisiae (18.67 mm), while sample 3 was the most effective against C. albicans (21.33 mm). This indicates that the samples have antifungal properties, with varying effectiveness. On the other hand, the oil samples showed exhibited no inhibition against P. aurantiogriseum or A. brasiliensis.
The antimicrobial potential of the samples varies significantly across different microbial strains. Sample 3 generally exhibited the highest antimicrobial activity among the samples tested, particularly against S. aureus, B. cereus, and L. monocytogenes, as well as C. albicans among the fungal strains. At the same time, the samples lack activity against certain strains (e.g., E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. Typhimurium, P. aurantiogriseum, and A. brasiliensis).

2.3. In Silico Molecular Simulation Model

To investigate the potential mechanism of ATP-ase inhibitory activity and consequently the antimicrobial activity against S. aureus and L. monocytogenes, a structural evaluation was performed for the different samples of the studied essential oils from H. italicum to inhibit a well-known antimicrobial drug target KdpD histidine kinase. To verify the structures of KdpD histidine kinases from S. aureus and L. monocytogenes and to identify the binding site, their structures and sequences were compared with histidine kinase EnvZ from E. coli (PDBID: 4KP4) and histidine kinase SrrB from S. aureus (PDBID: 6PAJ), identified by a BLAST search for homologue sequences against the PDB database. Analysis of crystal structures of histidine kinase EnvZ from E. coli and histidine kinase SrrB from S. aureus identified active sites for ATP binding and catalysis (Figure 3A). The modeled structures of catalytic histidine kinase domains of KdpD histidine kinase from S. aureus and L. monocytogenes have high structural similarity with homologue histidine kinases from E. coli. In addition, regions in the downloaded Alpha Fold structures that are involved in ATP binding have very high model confidence (pLDDT > 70), which makes these structures appropriate for further analysis and molecular docking simulations (Figure 3B).
In histidine kinase EnvZ from E. coli, His243 is a catalytic residue (Figure 3A). During the catalytic reaction, the active histidine residue assumes its position due to conformational changes induced by ATP binding. By sequence and structural alignment in catalytic histidine kinase domains of KdpD histidine kinase from S. aureus and L. monocytogenes with homologue histidine kinase EnvZ from E. coli and histidine kinase SrrB from S. aureus, His663 in S. aureus and His678 in L. monocytogenes were identified as catalytic residues (Figure 4).
Percentage of homology among the examined enzymes was in the range of 19.7 (between histidine kinase EnvZ—E. coli and KdpD histidine kinase—S. aureus) to 28.9 (between KdpD histidine kinase—L. monocytogenes and KdpD histidine kinase—S. aureus). Molecular docking simulation of KdpD histidine kinase from S. aureus with compounds identified in our essential oil samples revealed several potential candidates for binding and inhibition (Figure 5).
Among the compounds with high concentrations in samples, neryl acetate has the highest predicted binding energy (−46.03 kcal/mol) (Figure 5A). Its hydrophobic tail is buried among the hydrophobic residues Leu777, Leu846, Phe872, Ile822, and Ile814, while its polar head can make polar interactions with Pro812. In addition, the head is stabilized through hydrophobic interaction with Thr785. Another compound identified in our samples with favorable predicted binding energy is α-selinene (−37.69 kcal/mol) (Figure 5B). It does not have polar groups and makes hydrophobic interactions with Leu846, Phe872, Ile822, Ile814, and Pro812.
Analysis of KdpD histidine kinase from L. monocytogenes through molecular docking simulations identified the same candidates for binding and inhibition as in KdpD histidine kinase from S. aureus (Figure 6).
According to the presented simulation, α-selinene has the highest predicted binding energy against KdpD histidine kinase from L. monocytogenes (−37.89 kcal/mol) (Figure 6A). According to the results, hydrophobic interactions can occur with Leu792, Leu858, Leu836, Phe884, Ile828, and Ala 882. Similar to α-selinene, neryl acetate can bind to the hydrophobic pocket (−37.85 kcal/mol), making hydrophobic interactions with Leu858, Leu836, Phe884, Ile828, Ala 882, and Pro829 (Figure 6B). Furthermore, it can make polar interactions with Gly827. In contrast to α-selinene, neryl acetate is unable to bind deep into the pocket and interact with Leu792.

2.4. Artificial Neural Network Modeling

The optimized artificial neural network (ANN) model obtained demonstrated its capability to effectively predict the antimicrobial potential of H. italicum essential oil samples (expressed by S. aureus, B. cereus, L. monocytogenes, S. cerevisiae, and C. albicans), as shown in Table 1. The ideal configuration comprised a network architecture of 46 input, 24 hidden, and 5 output neurons in the multilayer perceptron (MLP), yielding the highest coefficient of determination (r2) values, reaching 1.000 during the training phase.

3. Discussion

In the Balkan type of oil, H. italicum essential oil is referred to as having ar- and γ-curcumene as its main compounds, which contribute to its special fragrance—strong, spicy, and herbal aroma with a honey-like nuance, often described as a curry-like odor [34,35,36]. On the other side, in the Corsica type of H. italicum essential oil, the most important compound is neryl acetate, which gives a specific sweet, floral fragrance, reminiscent of oranges and roses [36]. The presence of italidiones, β-diketones specific for the H. italicum essential oil, were characterized as early as 1967 [37,38], but there are still a limited number of papers that refer to their presence in the oil or their biological activity.
It is well known that H. italicum grows on alkaline, dry, sandy, and low-fertility soil. Samples 1 and 2 were obtained from producers located in Central and South Serbia. This is mountainous area, with a characteristic soil type and climate. Soils in Central Serbia are mostly classified as vertisols (according to World Reference Base for Soil Resources taxonomy) with a heavy texture and high clay content. In contrast, soil in South Serbia where H. italicum was sampled is classified as rendzina, which is typical in karst and mountain landscapes, where carbonate-rich material occurs on slopes. Soils in North Serbia mostly belong to chernozem type, a very fertile soil that can produce high agricultural yields with its high moisture-storage capacity. From the other side, samples 3 and 4 were obtained from producers located in North Serbia. This is a lowland region with a fertile chernozem soil type. In addition to the genotype, the soil and microclimate certainly have a significant influence on the stability in the quality of the essential oil [39,40].
Experimental results provided in Table 2 indicate that samples 1 through 4 had varying levels of antimicrobial activity against certain bacterial strains (e.g., S. aureus, B. cereus, L. monocytogenes). However, they showed no activity against E. coli, P. aeruginosa, or S. Typhimurium. The variation in antimicrobial activity among the examined samples and the previously reported studies can be due to several factors, including the specific strains tested (clinical isolates or standard reference microorganisms), the concentration of essential oil or its components, the methodologies used, and the experimental conditions. The primary components (neryl acetate, α-pinene, γ-curcumene) are known for their antimicrobial properties, suggesting that the presence and concentration of these compounds significantly influence the overall antimicrobial efficacy of H. italicum essential oil. Different methodologies (e.g., agar well diffusion, broth microdilution, microdilution assay) can yield varying results due to differences in sensitivity, concentration, and interaction dynamics between the essential oil and the microbial cells. Given correlations between samples and their antimicrobial potential, this quantitative analysis of the biocide effect revealed variations in the concentrations of major compounds such as γ-curcumene, α-pinene, and neryl acetate across the samples. For instance, sample 1 demonstrated a higher content of α-pinene (14.45%) than sample 4 (11.21%), which corresponded with its enhanced antimicrobial efficacy against S. aureus. The detailed chemical compositions are presented in Table 2, highlighting these differences. Furthermore, antimicrobial testing showed that sample 3 exhibited the strongest activity against L. monocytogenes, which could be correlated with its elevated levels of neryl acetate (9.38%). The inhibition zone measurements for each sample against various microorganisms provide a clear comparison of their antimicrobial potentials.
Analyzing all available results for the antimicrobial activity of H. italicum essential oil offers an understanding of microbial responses and suggests avenues for future research. The observed patterns in microbial behavior during contact with the essential oil and potential directions for antimicrobial investigation emerge when considering the variability in antimicrobial efficacy observed across different microbial strains and the chemical compositions of the tested samples. For example, a comparison of the results from Table 2 defines strong strain-specific connections, indicating that microbial sensitivity to H. italicum essential oil and its components varies significantly among different strains. For instance, S. aureus frequently shows sensitivity to H. italicum essential oil, suggesting a particular vulnerability of Gram-positive bacteria to the essential oil’s components [41]. Conversely, E. coli and P. aeruginosa often exhibit resistance, highlighting a potential pattern where certain Gram-negative bacteria may have inherent or developed resistance mechanisms against the components found in H. italicum essential oil [42]. Another observation can be directed to component-specific activity where antimicrobial potential appears to be closely tied to its chemical composition, particularly the concentrations of neryl acetate, α-pinene, and γ-curcumene. These compounds have been repeatedly associated with antimicrobial efficacy, suggesting their relative abundance may directly influence the essential oil’s overall antimicrobial potential [33,43].
Further research should aim to elucidate the specific mechanisms through which H. italicum essential oil and its primary components exert antimicrobial effects. Understanding these mechanisms at the molecular level can help in modifying essential oil formulations for targeted antimicrobial applications. Exploring the synergistic effects of H. italicum essential oil components with conventional antibiotics or other antimicrobial oils could open new directions for combination therapies that enhance antimicrobial efficacy.
In summary, identifying a range of compounds commonly associated with antimicrobial properties in the tested samples, including γ-curcumene, α-pinene, and neryl acetate, showed that the relative concentrations of these compounds varied notably among the samples. For example, sample 1 was characterized by a higher concentration of α-pinene, which correlated with its stronger antimicrobial activity against S. aureus (Table 2). This observation aligns with the literature suggesting that α-pinene has significant antibacterial properties [44]. In contrast, sample 3, which showed the most substantial activity against L. monocytogenes, had elevated levels of neryl acetate, a compound known for its efficacy against Gram-positive bacteria [45]. The observed variability in chemical profiles among the oil samples can be attributed to several environmental and procedural factors. Differences in soil composition, climate conditions, plant phenotype, and extraction methods are known to affect the secondary metabolite profiles in plants [46]. For instance, the variation in γ-curcumene levels between samples 2 and 4 may be due to differences in the distillation processes or harvest times, which warrants further investigation.
Additionally, some specifications for the sensitivity of tested microorganisms can be defined. Namely, antimicrobial testing revealed significant variability in the effectiveness of the essential oils against different microbial targets. While the essential oils demonstrated potent activity against Gram-positive bacteria, they exhibited reduced efficacy against Gram-negative bacteria. This pattern was consistent across all tested oil samples. The enhanced susceptibility of Gram-positive bacteria to essential oils can be attributed to their thicker peptidoglycan layer, which lacks an additional outer membrane barrier. This structural difference makes them more sensitive to the hydrophobic compounds found in essential oils that can disrupt lipid bilayers [47]. In contrast, the resistance of Gram-negative bacteria is likely due to their outer membrane, which is rich in lipopolysaccharides. This membrane acts as an effective barrier against many hydrophobic substances, limiting the penetration of antimicrobial agents. The distinct cell wall composition of fungi and yeasts, primarily composed of chitin and glucans, also provides different challenges and interactions with the bioactive compounds in essential oils [46].
The next step in this study involves the prediction of antimicrobial activity mechanism through the in silico molecular simulation models by investigating the ATP-ase inhibitory activity of H. italicum essential oils. Namely, the antimicrobial activity of essential oils through ATP-ase inhibitory activity has been described in numerous research reports [48,49,50]. Also, literature data shows decreased ATP-ase activity inside S. aureus when treated with some of the essential oil components (thymol and carvacrol) [51]. Thymol and carvacrol can affect cell membrane permeability and the ATP-ase activity of S. aureus, thus inhibiting its metabolic activity and growth. Similar to this is the case of L. monocytogenes [52]. Inspired by these facts, this study investigated the connection between the chemical content of H. italicum essential oils, their antimicrobial activity against selected microbial strains, and their possibilities to inhibit KdpD histidine kinase from S. aureus and L. monocytogenes, which regulates potassium homeostasis. ATP-ase, specifically KdpD histidine kinase, is a well-known antimicrobial target that regulates potassium homeostasis in bacteria such as S. aureus and L. monocytogenes, which have shown certain sensitivity in this study. The choice of ATP-ase inhibitory activity is inspired by reports in the literature showing that certain essential oil components, like thymol and carvacrol, can disrupt bacterial cell membrane permeability and ATP-ase activity, inhibiting metabolic activity and growth [51,52]. Furthermore, analysis of histidine kinase binding sites revealed hydrophobic residues in all analyzed proteins. A large hydrophobic pocket in the active site is perfectly shaped for essential oils that are mostly hydrophobic. In addition, some of the analyzed enzymes have polar groups that can bind polar residues, such as histidine and asparagine, or main chain polar groups. Sequence alignment of the analyzed sequences revealed that higher homology is observed in the regions involved in substrate binding as well as in the regions involved in the conformational change that occurs prior to the catalytic reaction. Most of the differences are reflected in the replacement of residues with similar characteristics (charged with charged, hydrophobic with hydrophobic, etc.). Structural analysis of the examined domains shows that they share a highly conserved helix-turn-helix fold. Similar results of sequence and structural alignments among KdpD histidine kinases from other microorganisms were obtained in previous research [53,54]. This data analysis demonstrates molecular docking simulations that compounds found in H. italicum essential oils have the potential to bind and inhibit KdpD histidine kinase, suggesting a mechanism through which tested oils exert their antimicrobial effects. Furthermore, the molecular docking simulations described in the research provide a detailed mechanism connecting the antimicrobial activity of H. italicum essential oils to their inhibitory action on ATP-ase, specifically the KdpD histidine kinase in S. aureus and L. monocytogenes.
The essential oils contain compounds identified through molecular docking simulations to bind with significant affinity to the KdpD histidine kinase, indicating their potential as effective inhibitors of this enzyme [55]. These compounds interact with the enzyme in a manner that highlights their hydrophobic and, in some cases, polar interactions with specific amino acid residues within the enzyme’s active site. In this study, neryl acetate and α-selinene demonstrated substantial predicted binding energies and interactions that suggest a strong inhibitory potential on the enzyme’s activity. Further experimental research with pure compounds would be beneficial to confirm these results. This inhibitory action is significant because the KdpD histidine kinase plays a crucial role in bacterial homeostasis and survival, particularly in the regulation of potassium homeostasis. By inhibiting this enzyme, the essential oils disrupt the bacterial cell’s regulatory mechanisms, leading to its inability to maintain essential cellular functions, which could ultimately result in bacterial death or significant inhibition of growth. The antimicrobial testing results presented in Table 2 provide empirical evidence supporting the theoretical predictions based on the molecular docking simulations. The essential oils exhibited varying degrees of antimicrobial activity against different bacterial and fungal strains, with some samples showing significant activity against S. aureus, B. cereus, and L. monocytogenes, and yeast strains such as S. cerevisiae and C. albicans. These results are particularly notable against the strains of S. aureus and L. monocytogenes, aligning with the in silico predictions of the essential oils’ inhibitory effects on the KdpD histidine kinase. This connection between the molecular docking simulations and antimicrobial testing results emphasizes the potential of H. italicum essential oils as a source for natural antimicrobial agents.
The complexity of the ANN model for predicting output variables was notable, featuring 1253 weight-bias coefficients, reflecting the significant nonlinearity of the observed system. A comparison between experimental and ANN-predicted values showed strong agreement, with the ANN values closely aligned with the measured values, particularly evident in the high r2 values. The sum of squared errors (SSE) obtained from the ANN model was comparable to experimental errors for output variables. Moreover, the lack-of-fit tests showed insignificance, affirming the model’s effectiveness in predicting output variables.
These results indicate that the high antibacterial activity in our samples against S. aureus and L. monocytogenes could have been induced by high concentrations of neryl acetate and α-selinene. Although both compounds perfectly fit the active site, only neryl acetate has the proposed characteristics for a good inhibitor; it has a polar part that provides specificity and a hydrophobic part that makes strong hydrophobic interactions.

Global Sensitivity Analysis

A global sensitivity analysis using Yoon’s interpretation method revealed the key influential parameters for predicting the antimicrobial potential of H. italicum essential oil samples, according to the chemical composition of these samples. According to global sensitivity analysis, the strongest influence on the antimicrobial potential of H. italicum on S. aureus, B. cereus, L. monocytogenes, S. cerevisiae, and C. albicans was obtained by α-pinene, trans-β-ocimene, terpinolene, terpinene-4-ol, isoitalicene, italicene, cis-α-bergamotene, trans-α-bergamotene, italidione I, trans-β-farnesene, γ-selinene, γ-curcumene, β-selinene, α-selinene, italdione II, italdione III, and guaiol (Figure 7). The influence of the most significant compounds such as trans-β-ocimene, terpinene-4-ol, isoitalicene, italicene, and italidione (Mw 210) on the relative importance of the antimicrobial potential of H. italicum is highlighted by red bars shown in Figure 7.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Essential Oil Samples

The essential oil used in this study was obtained directly from agricultural producers, who market the oils to trading companies. Samples 1 and 2 were obtained from producers located in Central and South Serbia. Samples 3 and 4 were obtained from producers located in North Serbia (Vojvodina Province).

4.2. Chromatographic Analysis of Essential Oil Samples

An Agilent 7890A chromatograph (Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) and HP-5 capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm, film thickness 0.25 μm) was used for quantitative analysis of the essential oil. The oven temperature was set as follows: 60 °C, ramp rate of 3 °C/min, and final temperature of 240 °C held for 2 min. The injector and detector temperatures were 230 and 250 °C, respectively. The carrier gas was He with a flow rate of 1 mL/min.
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry profiling of H. italicum essential oils was conducted using an Agilent 6890N GC coupled with a CTC Analytics CombiPal autosampler (Santa Clara, CA, USA), a nonpolar HP5-MS column, and an Agilent 5975B MS (Santa Clara, CA, USA) (details are given by Aćimović et al. [56]).
Quantitative results were obtained from GC-MS analyses. The individual peaks were identified by a computer matching of mass spectra with the ADAMS and NIST mass spectral database and by comparison of their linear retention indices (LRI) relative to a series of n-hydrocarbons (C9–C40). The percentage composition of compounds (relative quantity) in the essential oil and fraction of acids were computed from the GC-FID peak areas using the normalization method, without correction factors.

4.3. Antimicrobial Potential

To investigate the antimicrobial potential, various microorganisms were employed: Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium as Gram-negative strains; Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, and Listeria monocytogenes as Gram-positive strains; Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans as yeasts; and fungal representatives Aspergillus brasiliensis and Penicillium aurantiogriseum. All tested strains are from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC numbers are given in Table 2). The overnight cultures were prepared as follows:
  • The prokaryotes were streaked from −80 °C glycerol stock onto Müller–Hinton Agar (HiMedia, Mumbai, India) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h.
  • The eukaryotes were streaked from −80 °C glycerol stock onto Sabouraud Maltose Agar (HiMedia, Mumbai, India) and incubated at 25 °C for 5 days (A. brasiliensis and P. aurantiogriseum), 30 °C for 48 h (S. cerevisiae), and 37 °C for 48 h (C. albicans).
The antimicrobial potential was examined by using the disk diffusion method, which was earlier described in detail by Aćimović et al. [57]. After incubation, all sensitive microorganisms showed a lack of growth (no appearance of micro- or macrocolonies) around a disk where an oil aliquot of 15 µL was applied. The inhibition zones obtained by this method were evaluated as the diameter of the illuminated zone, expressed in millimeters. All experimental measurements were performed in triplicate.

4.4. In Silico Molecular Modeling Simulations

Three-dimensional structures of KdpD histidine kinase from S. aureus and L. monocytogenes were retrieved from the AlphaFold database (AF-Q2FWH7 and AF- A0A0E1R9J8, respectively) [58]. The catalytic histidine kinase domains were used from S. aureus and L. monocytogenes (positions 660–880 and 675–892, respectively) for further analysis. The sequences and structures were compared and aligned with the histidine kinase domain of the sensor histidine kinase EnvZ from E. coli (UniProt: P0AEJ4) (PDBID: 4KP4) [59], (with a sequence identity of 23.98% with S. aureus and 28.93% with L. monocytogenes), as well as the sensor protein SrrB from S. aureus (UniProt: Q9L523) (PDBID: 6PAJ) [59], (with a sequence identity of 24.76% with S. aureus and 26.76% with L. monocytogenes), which are homologous to the KdpD histidine kinase from S. aureus and L. monocytogenes. The structure of histidine kinase EnvZ from E. coli (PDBID: 4KP4) was used as it has ligand bonds in the active site, while the structure of sensor protein SrrB from S. aureus (PDBID: 6PAJ) was used as it is in the open position, which is suitable for initial ligand binding. The modeled structures of catalytic histidine kinase domains from S. aureus and L. monocytogenes were further minimized using the OPLS force field and the Maestro protein preparation workflow [60]. The protein structures were prepared for molecular docking simulations using the following parameters: polar hydrogen atoms were added, protonation types and termini treatment were enabled. The 3D structures of the examined volatile compounds from essential oil were built using the Maestro program in the Schrödinger package (Release 2024-2). The geometry optimizations of compounds used for molecular docking simulation and KdpD histidine kinases were performed using the OPLS4 force field and the Powell conjugated gradient algorithm method. The convergence criterion was set at 0.01 kcal/(mol Å) and a maximum iteration was set at 1000.
The molecular docking simulations were performed using the Glide 4.0 XP program [61], with extra precision mode and flexible ligand. Epik state penalties were used in calculating the docking score. Ligand binding affinities were calculated by the MM-GBSA method using the VSGB 2.0 solvation model [62]. The residues within a 4.0 Å distance from the ligand were assigned as flexible. The results obtained were visualized using the PyMol 3.0 program.
Previously conducted studies provided detailed insight into the activities of histidine kinase, and we used established principles for visualization and analysis [63,64].

4.5. Statistical Analysis

A three-layered multilayer perceptron (MLP) model was utilized for artificial neural network (ANN) analysis to assess the antimicrobial potential of H. italicum essential oil samples given in Table 2 (expressed by S. aureus, B. cereus, L. monocytogenes, S. cerevisiae, and C. albicans). Normalization of the experimental dataset was carried out to enhance the ANN performance. The Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno (BFGS) algorithm was employed to solve nonlinear problems encountered during network modeling. Various network topologies, exceeding 100,000 in number, were explored by adjusting the number of neurons in the hidden layer (ranging from 5 to 20) and initializing weights and biases randomly [65].
A global sensitivity analysis was performed using Yoon’s interpretation method to assess the relative impact of bioactive compound content on antimicrobial activity, employing the weight coefficients derived from the ANN model [66].
Statistical analysis was conducted using StatSoft Statistica 10.0® software.

5. Conclusions

This study elucidates the multifaceted properties and therapeutic potential of Helichrysum italicum essential oil. The findings highlight the importance in understanding the variability in essential oil composition, particularly in samples from different geographical regions like Serbia, and its impact on antimicrobial activity. The antimicrobial assays reveal varying degrees of activity against bacterial and fungal strains. Moreover, molecular docking simulations identified neryl acetate and α-selinene as promising inhibitors of KdpD histidine kinase, indicating potential mechanisms of action against pathogenic bacteria like S. aureus and L. monocytogenes.
Overall, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the biological activities and industrial potential of H. italicum essential oil, facilitating further research and application development in the field of natural products and alternative medicine.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.Z., O.Š., V.V. and M.A.; methodology, T.Z., O.Š., V.V., M.R. and N.P.V.; software, B.L. and L.P.; validation, M.R. and M.A.; formal analysis, T.Z., O.Š., V.V. and M.R.; investigation, T.Z., O.Š., V.V., N.P.V. and M.R.; resources, M.A.; data curation, B.L. and L.P.; writing—original draft preparation, T.Z., O.Š., V.V., B.L., M.A. and L.P.; writing—review and editing, T.Z., O.Š., V.V., B.L., M.A. and L.P.; visualization, V.V., B.L. and L.P.; supervision, M.A.; project administration, M.A.; funding acquisition, L.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia, grant numbers 451-03-66/2024-03/200032 (T.Z.; M.A.), 451-03-66/2024-03/200134 (O.Š.; V.V.; B.L.), 451-03-66/2024-03/200051 (L.P.), and 451-03-68/2024-14/200125 (M.R.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chang, Y.; Harmon, P.F.; Treadwell, D.D.; Carrillo, D.; Sarkhosh, A.; Brecht, J.K. Biocontrol potential of essential oils in organic horticulture systems: From farm to fork. Front. Nutr. 2022, 8, 805138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Winska, K.; Mączka, W.; Łyczko, J.; Grabarczyk, M.; Czubaszek, A.; Szumny, A. Essential oils as antimicrobial agents-Myth or real alternative? Molecules 2019, 24, 2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tit, D.M.; Bungau, S.G. Antioxidant activity of essential oils. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Raybaudi-Massilia, R.M.; Mosqueda-Melgar, J.; Martin-Belloso, O. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils on Salmonella Enteritidis, Escherichia coli, and Listeria innocua in fruit juices. J. Food Prot. 2006, 69, 1579–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pandey, A.K.; Kumar, P.; Singh, P.; Tripathi, N.N.; Bajpai, V.K. Essential oils: Sources of antimicrobials and food preservatives. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wang, J.; Zhao, F.; Huang, J.; Li, Q.; Yang, Q.; Ju, J. Application of essential oils as slow-release antimicrobial agents in food preservation: Preparation strategies, release mechanisms and application cases. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 18, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Dreger, M.; Wielgus, K. Application of essential oils as natural cosmetic preservatives. Herba Pol. 2013, 59, 142–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shkreli, R.; Terziu, R.; Memushaj, L.; Dhamo, K.; Malaj, L. Selected essential oils as natural ingredients in cosmetic emulsions: Development, stability testing and antimicrobial activity. Indian J. Pharm. Educ. Res. 2023, 57, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Edris, A. Pharmaceutical and therapeutic potentials of essential oils and their individual volatile constituents: A review. Phytother. Res. 2007, 21, 308–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cimino, C.; Maurel, O.M.; Musumeci, T.; Bonaccorso, A.; Drago, F.; Souto, E.M.B.; Pignatello, R.; Carbone, C. Essential oils: Pharmaceutical applications and encapsulation strategies into lipid-based delivery systems. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bogdanović, A.; Skala, D. Application of Plant Essential Oils in Pharma and Aroma Industries. In Plant Essential Oils; Prakash, B., Dubey, N.K., Freitas Brilhante de São José, J., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2024; pp. 177–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Aćimović, M.; Lončar, B. Aromatherapy: Therapy with fragrances of lavender essential oil. In Plant Specialized Metabolites; Reference Series in, Phytochemistry; Mérillon, J.M., Ramawat, K.G., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 1–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Miljković, A.; Aćimović, M.; Božanić Tanjga, B.; Lončar, B.; Raičević, V.; Šovljanski, O.; Travičić, V.; Pezo, M.; Pezo, L. Inhalation and topical application of rose essential oil—A systematic overview of Rosa damascena aromatherapy. J. Agron. Technol. Eng. Manag. 2024, 7, 998–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Raveau, R.; Fontaine, J.; Lounès-Hadj Sahraoui, A. Essential oils as potential alternative biocontrol products against plant pathogens and weeds: A review. Foods 2020, 9, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gupta, I.; Singh, R.; Muthusamy, S.; Sharma, M.; Grewal, K.; Singh, H.P.; Batish, D.R. Plant essential oils as biopesticides: Applications, mechanisms, innovations, and constraints. Plants 2023, 12, 2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Catani, L.; Grassi, E.; di Montanara, A.C.; Guidi, L.; Sandulli, R.; Manachini, B.; Semprucci, F. Essential oils and their applications in agriculture and agricultural products: A literature analysis through VOSviewer. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2022, 45, 102502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Thoma, J.L.; Cantrell, C.L.; Zheljazkov, V.D. Evaluation of essential oils as sprout suppressants for potato (Solanum tuberosum) at room temperature storage. Plants 2022, 11, 3055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Furlan, V.; Bren, U. Helichrysum italicum: From extraction, distillation, and encapsulation techniques to beneficial health effects. Foods 2023, 12, 802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Akinfenwa, A.O.; Sagbo, I.J.; Makhaba, M.; Mabusela, W.T.; Hussein, A.A. Helichrysum genus and compound activities in the management of diabetes mellitus. Plants 2022, 11, 1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jažo, Z.; Glumac, M.; Drventić, I.; Žilić, L.; Dujmović, T.; Bajić, D.; Vučemilo, M.; Ivić, E.; Bektić, S.; Anačkov, G.; et al. The essential oil composition of Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. Don: Influence of steam, hydro and microwave-assisted distillation. Separations 2022, 9, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tzanova, M.; Grozeva, N.; Gerdzhikova, M.; Atanasov, V.; Terzieva, S.; Prodanova, R. Biochemical composition of essential oil of Corsican Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. Don, introduced and cultivated in South Bulgaria. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2018, 24, 1071–1077. [Google Scholar]
  22. Aćimović, M.; Ljujić, J.; Vulić, J.; Zheljazkov, V.D.; Pezo, L.; Varga, A.; Tumbas Šaponjac, V. Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. Don essential oil from Serbia: Chemical composition, classification and biological activity—May it be a suitable new crop for Serbia? Agronomy 2021, 11, 1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Erbas, S.; Erdogan, U.; Mutlucan, M. The scent compounds of immortelle ecotypes (Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. Don.) grown in Turkiye and its new products (absolute and concrete). S. Afr. J. Bot. 2023, 158, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chinou, I.; Roussis, V.; Perdetzoglou, D.; Loukis, A. Chemical and biological studies on two Helichrysum species of Greek origin. Planta Med. 1996, 62, 377–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Melito, S.; Sias, A.; Petretto, G.; Chessa, M.; Pintore, G.; Porceddu, A. Genetic and metabolite diversity of Sardinian populations of Helichrysum italicum. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e79043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rigano, D.; Formisano, C.; Senatore, F.; Picente, S.; Pagano, E.; Capasso, R.; Borrelli, F.; Izzo, A. Intestinal antispasmotic effects of Helichrysum italicum (Roth) Don ssp. italicum and chemical identification of the active ingredients. J. Ethnoph. 2013, 150, 901–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Aćimović, M. Corsica vs Balkan immortelle essential oil—Comparison of chemical profiles. Altern. Crops Cultivat. Prac. 2023, 5, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  28. Saint-Lary, L.; Minaglou, F.; Escriva, C.; Beyls, A.S.; Badie, F. Helichrysum italicum D.C. essential oil from Balkans. Perfum. Flavor. 2018, 43, 52–66. [Google Scholar]
  29. Elsharif, S.A.; Buettner, A. Structure–odor relationship study on geraniol, nerol, and their synthesized oxygenated derivatives. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 66, 2324–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Shaaban, H.A.E.; El-Ghorab, A.H.; Shibamoto, T. Bioactivity of essential oils and their volatile aroma components: Review. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2012, 24, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mancianti, F.; Ebani, V.V. Biological activity of essential oils. Molecules 2020, 25, 678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. de Sousa, D.P.; Damasceno, R.O.S.; Amorati, R.; Elshabrawy, H.A.; de Castro, R.D.; Bezerra, D.P.; Nunes, V.R.V.; Gomes, R.C.; Lima, T.C. Essential oils: Chemistry and pharmacological activities. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Genčić, M.; Aksić, J.; Živković Stošić, M.; Ranđelović, P.; Stojanović, N.; Stojanović-Radić, Z.; Radulović, N. Linking the antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory effects of immortelle essential oil with its chemical composition—The interplay between the major and minor constituents. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2021, 158, 112666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Andreani, S.; Uehara, A.; Blagojević, P.; Radulović, N.; Muselli, A.; Baldovini, N. Key odorants of industrially-produced Helichrysum italicum subsp. italicum essential oil. Ind. Crops. Prod. 2019, 132, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sharmeen, J.B.; Mahomoodally, F.M.; Zengin, G.; Maggi, F. Essential oils as natural sources of fragrance compounds for cosmetics and cosmeceuticals. Molecules 2021, 26, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Stanojević, J.; Stanojević, L.; Bulatović, V.; Zvezdanić, J.; Milenković, A.; Simonović, N.; Cvetković, D. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of immortelle (Helichrysum italicum) (Roth) G. Don) and yarrow (Achillea millefolium L.) essential oils. Adv. Technol. 2022, 11, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Manitto, P.; Monti, D.; Colombo, E. Two new β-diketones from Helichrysum italicum. Phytochemistry 1972, 11, 2112–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tira, S.; Di Modica, G. New β-diketones from Helichrysum italicum G. Don. Tetrahedron Lett. 1967, 2, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bianchini, A.; Santoni, F.; Paolini, J.; Bernardini, A.F.; Mouillot, D.; Costa, J. Partitioning the relative contributions of inorganic plant composition and soil characteristics to the quality of Helichrysum italicum subsp. italicum (Roth) G. Don fil. essential oil. Chem. Biodivers. 2009, 6, 1014–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Guinoiseau, E.; Lorenzi, V.; Luciani, A.; Muselli, A.; Costa, J.; Casanova, J.; Berti, L. Biological properties and resistance reversal effect of Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. Don. In Microbial Pathogens and Strategies for Combating Them: Science, Technology and Education; Méndez-Vilas, A., Ed.; Formatex Research Center: Badajoz, Spain, 2013; Volume 2, pp. 1073–1080. [Google Scholar]
  41. Weglarz, Z.; Kosakowska, O.; Pioro-Jabrucka, E.; Przybyl, J.; Gniewosz, M.; Krasniewska, K.; Szyndel, M.; Costa, R.; Barbara Baczek, K. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. Don. From Central Europe. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bezek, K.; Kramberger, K.; Barlič-Maganja, D. Antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. Don hydrosol. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cui, H.; Zhao, C.; Lin, L. Antibacterial activity of Helichrysum italicum oil on vegetables and its mechanism of action. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2015, 39, 2663–2672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Borges, M.F.d.A.; Lacerda, R.d.S.; Correia, J.P.d.A.; de Melo, T.R.; Ferreira, S.B. Potential antibacterial action of α-pinene. Med. Sci. Forum 2022, 12, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gevrenova, R.; Kostadinova, I.; Stefanova, A.; Balabanova, V.; Zengin, G.; Zheleva-Dimitrova, D.; Momekov, G. Phytochemical Profiling, Antioxidant and Cognitive-Enhancing Effect of Helichrysum italicum ssp. italicum (Roth) G. Don (Asteraceae). Plants 2023, 12, 2755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pant, P.; Pandey, S.; Dall’Acqua, S. The influence of environmental conditions on secondary metabolites in medicinal plants: A literature review. Chem. Biodivers. 2021, 18, e2100345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cox, S.D.; Mann, C.M.; Markham, J.L.; Bell, H.C.; Gustafson, J.E.; Warmington, J.R.; Wyllie, S.G. The mode of antimicrobial action of the essential oil of Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree oil). J. Appl. Microbiol. 2000, 88, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Issa, D.; Najjar, A.; Greige-Gerges, H.; Nehme, H. Screening of some essential oil constituents as potential inhibitors of the ATP synthase of Escherichia coli. J. Food Sci. 2019, 84, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sikkema, J.; de Bont, J.A.; Poolman, B. Mechanisms of membrane toxicity of hydrocarbons. Microbiol. Rev. 1995, 59, 201–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Han, Y.; Sun, Z.; Chen, W. Antimicrobial susceptibility and antibacterial mechanism of limonene against Listeria monocytogenes. Molecules 2019, 25, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Su, F.; Yang, G.; Hu, D.; Ruan, C.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, Q. Chemical composition, antibacterial and antioxidant activities of essential oil from Centipeda minima. Molecules 2023, 28, 824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Gill, A.O.; Holley, R.A. Inhibition of membrane bound ATPases of Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes by plant oil aromatics. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 111, 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kishii, R.; Falzon, L.; Yoshida, T.; Kobayashi, H.; Inouye, M. Structural and functional studies of the HAMP domain of EnvZ, an osmosensing transmembrane histidine kinase in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 26401–26408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Khorchid, A.; Inouye, M.; Ikura, M. Structural characterization of Escherichia coli sensor histidine kinase EnvZ: The periplasmic C-terminal core domain is critical for homodimerization. Biochem. J. 2005, 385, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Maruca, A.; Lanzillotta, D.; Rocca, R.; Lupia, A.; Costa, G.; Catalano, R.; Moraca, F.; Gaudio, E.; Ortuso, F.; Artese, A.; et al. Multi-targeting bioactive compounds extracted from essential oils as kinase inhibitors. Molecules 2020, 25, 2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Aćimović, M.; Zeremski, T.; Šovljanski, O.; Lončar, B.; Pezo, L.; Zheljazkov, V.D.; Pezo, M.; Šuput, D.; Kurunci, Z. Seasonal variations in essential oil composition of immortelle cultivated in Serbia. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Aćimović, M.; Šovljanski, O.; Pezo, L.; Travičić, V.; Tomić, A.; Zheljazkov, V.D.; Cetković, G.; Švarc-Gajić, J.; Brezo-Borjan, T.; Sofrenić, I. Variability in biological activities of Satureja montana subsp. montana and subsp. variegata based on different extraction methods. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. AlphaFold Database. Available online: https://alphafold.ebi.ac.uk/ (accessed on 15 January 2024).
  59. UniProt Database. Available online: https://www.uniprot.org/ (accessed on 15 January 2024).
  60. Lu, C.; Wu, C.; Ghoreishi, D.; Chen, W.; Wang, L.; Damm, W.; Ross, G.A.; Dahlgren, M.K.; Russell, E.; Von Bargen, C.D.; et al. OPLS4: Improving force field accuracy on challenging regimes of chemical space. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2021, 17, 4291–4300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Friesner, R.A.; Murphy, R.B.; Repasky, M.P.; Frye, L.L.; Greenwood, J.R.; Halgren, T.A.; Sanschagrin, P.C.; Mainz, D.T. Extra precision glide: Docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 6177–6196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Hou, T.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, W.; Houa, T.; Wangb, J.; Lia, Y.; Wang, W. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods: I. The accuracy of binding free energy calculations based on molecular dynamics simulations. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2011, 51, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Casino, P.; Miguel-Romero, L.; Marina, A. Visualizing autophosphorylation in histidine kinases. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chen, H.; Yu, C.; Wu, H.; Li, G.; Li, C.; Hong, W.; Yang, X.; Wang, H.; You, X. Recent advances in histidine kinase-targeted antimicrobial agents. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 866392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ochoa-Martínez, C.I.; Ayala-Aponte, A.A. Prediction of mass transfer kinetics during osmotic dehydration of apples using neural networks. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 40, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yoon, Y.; Swales, G.; Margavio, T.M. A Comparison of Discriminant Analysis versus Artificial Neural Networks. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 1993, 44, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. GS-MS chromatogram of H. italicum essential oil with respective italidiones MS spectra.
Figure 1. GS-MS chromatogram of H. italicum essential oil with respective italidiones MS spectra.
Antibiotics 13 00499 g001
Figure 2. The cluster of the observed samples of H. italicum essential oil (according to Table 1).
Figure 2. The cluster of the observed samples of H. italicum essential oil (according to Table 1).
Antibiotics 13 00499 g002
Figure 3. (A) Crystal structure of histidine kinase EnvZ from E. coli in complex with adenyl imidodiphosphate (PDBID: 4KP4); (B) aligned structures of catalytic histidine kinase domains of KdpD histidine kinase from S. aureus and L. monocytogenes with homologue histidine kinase EnvZ from E. coli (PDBID: 4KP4) and histidine kinase SrrB from S. aureus (PDBID: 6OAJ).
Figure 3. (A) Crystal structure of histidine kinase EnvZ from E. coli in complex with adenyl imidodiphosphate (PDBID: 4KP4); (B) aligned structures of catalytic histidine kinase domains of KdpD histidine kinase from S. aureus and L. monocytogenes with homologue histidine kinase EnvZ from E. coli (PDBID: 4KP4) and histidine kinase SrrB from S. aureus (PDBID: 6OAJ).
Antibiotics 13 00499 g003
Figure 4. Sequence alignment of histidine kinase domains of KdpD histidine kinase from S. aureus and L. monocytogenes with homologue histidine kinase EnvZ from E. coli and histidine kinase SrrB from S. aureus.
Figure 4. Sequence alignment of histidine kinase domains of KdpD histidine kinase from S. aureus and L. monocytogenes with homologue histidine kinase EnvZ from E. coli and histidine kinase SrrB from S. aureus.
Antibiotics 13 00499 g004
Figure 5. Molecular docking simulations of KdpD histidine kinase from S. aureus with (A) neryl acetate; (B) α-selinene.
Figure 5. Molecular docking simulations of KdpD histidine kinase from S. aureus with (A) neryl acetate; (B) α-selinene.
Antibiotics 13 00499 g005
Figure 6. Molecular docking simulations of KdpD histidine kinase from L. monocytogenes with (A) α-selinene; (B) neryl acetate.
Figure 6. Molecular docking simulations of KdpD histidine kinase from L. monocytogenes with (A) α-selinene; (B) neryl acetate.
Antibiotics 13 00499 g006
Figure 7. The relative importance of the antimicrobial potential of H. italicum essential oil samples (expressed by S. aureus, B. cereus, L. monocytogenes, S. cerevisiae, and C. albicans), according to the chemical composition of different samples (compound codes are presented in Table 1).
Figure 7. The relative importance of the antimicrobial potential of H. italicum essential oil samples (expressed by S. aureus, B. cereus, L. monocytogenes, S. cerevisiae, and C. albicans), according to the chemical composition of different samples (compound codes are presented in Table 1).
Antibiotics 13 00499 g007
Table 1. Chemical composition (%) of four different samples of H. italicum essential oils from Serbia.
Table 1. Chemical composition (%) of four different samples of H. italicum essential oils from Serbia.
CompoundClassRT (min)Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3Sample 4
1α-pineneMonoterpene4.93514.459.7511.6511.21
2,3α-fenchene + campheneMonoterpene5.1910.530.380.330.18
4β-pineneMonoterpene5.9320.540.570.190.30
5myrceneMonoterpene6.2810.200.12ndnd
6α-terpineneMonoterpene7.0430.200.210.160.16
7p-cymeneMonoterpene7.2850.270.320.220.21
8limoneneMonoterpene7.4275.293.302.981.96
91,8-cineoleMonoterpene7.4840.310.290.560.32
10trans-β-ocimene Monoterpene8.0320.16ndndnd
11isobutyl angelateEster8.1320.450.450.290.24
12γ-terpineneMonoterpene8.3880.480.500.330.39
13terpinoleneMonoterpene9.4120.210.180.290.15
14linaloolMonoterpene9.8391.352.240.470.70
152-methyl butyl-2-methyl butyrateEster9.9790.230.230.130.14
162,4, dimethyloctan, 3-5dion (Mw 170)Ketone11.8781.321.531.070.92
17borneolMonoterpene12.3120.10nd0.270.10
18terpinene-4-olMonoterpene12.7900.300.390.260.34
193,4 octan dioneKetone13.1960.730.790.430.35
20α-terpineoleMonoterpene13.3390.390.440.480.32
21nerolMonoterpene14.8771.221.820.540.48
223-Butyl-6-methylpiperazine-2,5-dione Mw 184, dioneKetone17.2910.300.550.43nd
23neryl acetateEster20.3187.429.383.453.10
24α-ylangeneSesquterpene20.6189.849.613.534.00
25α-copaeneSesquterpene20.9602.641.674.943.04
26isoitaliceneSesquterpene21.8640.110.180.180.16
27italicene Sesquterpene22.0853.424.505.014.26
28cis-α-bergamotene Sesquterpene22.6051.111.390.991.72
29trans-caryophylleneSesquterpene22.7484.823.595.556.00
30trans-α-bergamotene Sesquterpene23.3961.171.191.031.52
31italidione I (Mw 210)Ketone23.6811.903.842.962.89
32α-humuleneSesquterpene24.0370.240.170.260.36
33neryl propanoateEster24.2152.122.360.600.94
34trans-β-farnesene Sesquterpene24.3140.47nd0.46nd
35γ-selineneSesquterpene24.9632.461.052.562.22
36γ-curcumeneSesquterpene25.36213.1115.8113.3419.98
37ar-curcumeneSesquterpene25.4475.919.0814.4011.74
38β-selineneSesquterpene25.6460.682.103.071.90
39α-selineneSesquterpene25.8535.722.615.175.38
40α-muuroleneSesquterpene25.9950.35nd0.740.86
41italdione II (Mw 224)Ketone 26.2380.260.18nd0.49
42γ-cadineneSesquterpene26.4660.950.781.361.42
43δ-cadineneSesquterpene26.8790.970.512.331.34
44italdione III (Mw 238)Ketone28.8800.540.610.980.47
45guaiolSesquterpene29.6710.190.360.110.20
46rosifoliolSesquterpene30.0050.730.800.330.47
47α-eudesmolSesquterpene31.5440.250.300.380.11
Total monoterpenes 26.0020.5118.7316.82
Total esters 10.2212.424.474.42
Total ketones 5.057.505.875.12
Total sesquterpenes 55.1455.7065.7466.68
TOTAL IDENTIFIED 96.4197.1394.8193.04
RT—retention time; nd—not detected.
Table 2. Assessment of the antimicrobial potential of H. italicum essential oil samples from Serbia measured as inhibition zones (mm).
Table 2. Assessment of the antimicrobial potential of H. italicum essential oil samples from Serbia measured as inhibition zones (mm).
SamplesControls
Positive Control
for Bacteria
Positive Control for Yeast and FungiNegative Control
ATCCMicrobial Strain1234Cefotaxime + Clavulanic AcidActidioneWater
25922Escherichia colindndndnd27.00/nd
27853Pseudomonas aeruginosandndndnd21.00/nd
13311Salmonella Typhimuriumndndndnd29.00/nd
25923Staphylococcus aureus17.6712.0019.6710.0028.33/nd
11778Bacillus cereus11.00nd12.677.3327.00/nd
19115Listeria monocytogenes7.3313.0017.0013.0029.00/nd
9763Saccharomyces cerevisiae13.6718.6715.3314.67/34.00nd
10231Candida albicans7.6713.6711.3310.33/37.00nd
16025Penicillium aurantiogriseumndndndnd/26.33nd
16404Aspergillus brasiliensisndndndnd/27.00nd
nd—not detected.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zeremski, T.; Šovljanski, O.; Vukić, V.; Lončar, B.; Rat, M.; Perković Vukčević, N.; Aćimović, M.; Pezo, L. Combination of Chromatographic Analysis and Chemometric Methods with Bioactivity Evaluation of the Antibacterial Properties of Helichrysum italicum Essential Oil. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 499. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13060499

AMA Style

Zeremski T, Šovljanski O, Vukić V, Lončar B, Rat M, Perković Vukčević N, Aćimović M, Pezo L. Combination of Chromatographic Analysis and Chemometric Methods with Bioactivity Evaluation of the Antibacterial Properties of Helichrysum italicum Essential Oil. Antibiotics. 2024; 13(6):499. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13060499

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zeremski, Tijana, Olja Šovljanski, Vladimir Vukić, Biljana Lončar, Milica Rat, Nataša Perković Vukčević, Milica Aćimović, and Lato Pezo. 2024. "Combination of Chromatographic Analysis and Chemometric Methods with Bioactivity Evaluation of the Antibacterial Properties of Helichrysum italicum Essential Oil" Antibiotics 13, no. 6: 499. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13060499

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop