Next Article in Journal
Emerging Challenges in Methicillin Resistance of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci
Previous Article in Journal
Leveraging the McGeer Criteria to Estimate the Frequency of Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing for Urinary and Respiratory Tract Infections Relative to the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic at a Skilled Nursing Facility
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Glucose Supplementation Enhances the Bactericidal Effect of Penicillin and Gentamicin on Streptococcus sanguinis Persisters

1
Division of Infections and Molecular Biology, Department of Health Promotion, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu 803-8580, Fukuoka, Japan
2
Division of Oral Functional Development, Department of Health Promotion, Kyushu Dental University, Kitakyushu 803-8580, Fukuoka, Japan
3
Collaborative Research Centre for Green Materials on Environmental Technology, Kyushu Institute of Technology, 1-1 Sensui-chou, Tobata-ku, Kitakyushu 803-8580, Fukuoka, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2025, 14(1), 36; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14010036
Submission received: 20 November 2024 / Revised: 20 December 2024 / Accepted: 3 January 2025 / Published: 5 January 2025

Abstract

:
Background: Streptococcus sanguinis is a leading cause of infective endocarditis (IE), which causes diverse clinical symptoms and even death. Recurrence after treatment is a crucial problem in IE, possibly caused by the presence of “persister” cells, a small bacterial population that can survive antimicrobials. In this study, the residual risk for penicillin G (PCG) and gentamicin (GM), used for treating IE, to induce Streptococcus sanguinis persisters, was investigated. Methods: The bactericidal effects of PCG and GM on S. sanguinis were evaluated. Furthermore, we confirmed whether the S. sanguinis that survived following combination treatment with PCG and GM were persisters. The bactericidal effect of the combination of PCG and GM against S. sanguinis was measured after the addition of glucose or arginine. Results: Following 48 h of treatment with PCG (1600 μg/mL) and GM (64 μg/mL), S. sanguinis survived, albeit with a low bacterial count, indicating the presence of persisters. The addition of glucose or arginine to PCG and GM increased the bactericidal effect on residual persister cells and reduced the number of persister cells. Moreover, the addition of glucose at concentrations of 10 mg/mL or higher was substantially effective in achieving sterilization. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that persisters of S. sanguinis that survive antimicrobial treatment may make the treatment of IE challenging, and that combining antimicrobial treatment with glucose is effective for eliminating persisters of S. sanguinis. Taken together, these findings may facilitate the development of novel therapeutic strategies against IE caused by oral streptococcal infection.

1. Introduction

Oral diseases (dental caries and periodontal disease) [1] are primarily caused by oral bacteria and are widely prevalent worldwide. Oral bacteria can cause not only oral, but also systemic diseases, such as infective endocarditis (IE) [2]. Streptococcus sanguinis is widely present in the oral cavity from early infancy and is found on tooth surfaces and supragingival plaques [3,4]. It is usually associated with healthy plaque biofilms [5] and contributes to the subsequent microbial colonization that is essential in biofilm formation [6]. In addition to its role as a primary oral colonizer, S. sanguinis is a well-known cause of IE [7]. IE is a systemic septic disease that forms bacterial plaques in the valve leaflets and endocardium. It presents with various clinical manifestations, including bacteremia, vascular emboli, and cardiac injury [8]. IE is caused by various bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus and viridans group streptococci (including S. sanguinis). Its annual incidence is reported to be rare, ranging from three to ten cases per 100,000 people [8]. However, once IE occurs, it is associated with an elevated mortality rate [9]. S. sanguinis causes IE by invading the body through capillaries in the gingiva during dental treatments and brushing [10]. IE is typically initially treated with antimicrobial agents [11]; however, recurrence after treatment is common. Specifically, the reported recurrence rate is approximately 6%, which is not a low rate [12]. IE recurrence is caused by the regrowth of infected microorganisms, highlighting that conventional antimicrobial therapy does not fully eliminate infectious microorganisms. One possible reason for this is the presence of “persisters,” which we consider to be a key risk factor for IE recurrence.
Hobby et al. first observed persisters in 1942 [13]. Persisters are bacterial phenotypes formed as a result of environmental stresses, such as drugs or starvation [14,15]. Their major difference from resistant bacteria is that the persisters that survive stress do not acquire resistance genes, i.e., the persister cells and the other sensitive cells remain in the same genome. Persister against antibiotics is defined as the ability of susceptible bacteria to survive the antibiotics by entering a nongrowing state [16]. A key characteristic of persisters against antibiotics is two-phase sterilization, in which susceptible populations are rapidly sterilized, while subpopulations of persisters are sterilized after a delay [17]. This phenomenon is indicative of phenotypic heterogeneity in bacterial cultures, meaning that not all bacteria in a population are killed at the same rate. Unlike resistant bacteria, persisters do not grow in the presence of antibiotics. Both persister and antibiotic-resistant bacteria exhibit increased survival rates in the presence of antibiotics compared to susceptible bacteria. However, in the presence of antibiotics, only a small fraction of bacteria survive as persisters, whereas the entire population of resistant bacteria survives [18]. Therefore, antibiotic persisters represent a bacterial phenotype that allows a very small population of bacteria to survive antibiotic exposure, and they are distinct from drug-resistant bacteria. Since the discovery of this population, the underlying mechanisms have been elucidated. The toxin/antitoxin system was first shown to be important as a survival mechanism for persisters [19], and many TA systems related to persisters have been identified. While extensive research on persisters has focused on common environmental bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [20,21,22,23], persisters have also been reported for oral bacteria [24,25,26]. As mentioned above, oral streptococci are closely related to IE, but there have been no reports of oral streptococcal persisters being involved, to the best of our knowledge. Even with IE antimicrobial therapy, persisters of oral-associated bacteria can survive and proliferate, causing chronic infection and recurrence.
Penicillin G (PCG), gentamicin (GM), and vancomycin are used as treatments for IE, based on international guidelines established for prescribing medications (such as The Japanese Circulation Society [27], the American Heart Association (AHA) [28], and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [11]). However, the role of bacterial persisters in the recurrence and chronicity of IE has not been reported in previous studies or guidelines. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether S. sanguinis survives by forming persisters following treatment with PCG and GM, as well as to identify effective treatment strategies against persisters. Identifying survival through persister formation and developing methods to effectively sterilize persisters will provide new strategies to treat infections in the future.

2. Results

2.1. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of PCG and GM Against S. sanguinis

The growth inhibition of S. sanguinis by PCG and GM is shown in Figure 1.
The growth inhibition of PCG and GM against S. sanguinis was evaluated by measuring absorbance at 620 nm, and then compared to an untreated control (0 µg/mL PCG and GM). PCG and GM significantly inhibited the growth of S. sanguinis at concentrations of 0.06 μg/mL and 64 μg/mL, respectively; therefore, these were determined as the MICs.

2.2. S. sanguinis Continues to Survive by Forming Persisters Against PCG and GM

The bactericidal effects against S. sanguinis were evaluated to measure the colony-forming units (CFU) using PCG at 1600 μg/mL and GM at 64 μg/mL, which are the concentrations specified in the AHA guidelines. The combination of PCG and GM (PCG/GM) was highly effective, killing 99.8% of the S. sanguinis population in 24 h. However, some of the bacteria continued to survive after that time (Figure 2).
The surviving bacteria likely escaped the antibacterial effects and were considered persister cells. The bactericidal effect of the individual PCG or GM treatments was lower than that of the combined treatment (Supplementary Figure S1).

2.3. S. sanguinis That Survived PCG/GM Is Not Drug-Resistant But Persister

S. sanguinis that survived PCG/GM treatment for more than 24 h may have acquired resistance genes and survived; therefore, we determined whether the surviving bacteria were persisters or drug-resistant. As shown in Figure 3, a second round of PCG/GM treatment on the bacterial population that had regrown after an initial PCG/GM treatment reduced the bacterial count to the same extent.
The number of drug-resistant mutants did not decrease (i.e., they did not die) when retreated with the antibiotics again, indicating that the bacteria surviving the PCG/GM treatment were persisters. This result highlights the risk of recurrence and the challenges in achieving effective treatment using current drug treatments, as persisters remain regardless of repeated antibiotic treatment.

2.4. Glucose Enhances the Bactericidal Effect of PCG/GM Against S. sanguinis Persisters

Since a small percentage of bacteria survived by becoming persisters following treatment with PCG/GM, we subsequently explored the sterilization of these persister cells. A combination of glucose and aminoglycoside antimicrobials has been demonstrated to be effective in sterilizing persister cells [29]. Amino acids can resuscitate persister cells from dormancy [22]. We hypothesized that awakening the persister cells from their dormant state would enhance the bactericidal effect of the antimicrobials. Arginine was used in this experiment because arginine can be metabolized by S. sanguinis [30]. Consequently, we evaluated whether the addition of glucose (1, 10, or 100 mg/mL) or arginine (725 μg/mL or 10 mg/mL) to an M9 minimal medium containing PCG/GM enhanced the bactericidal effect of the antimicrobials. As shown in Figure 4a, all glucose concentrations resulted in enhanced bactericidal activity. In addition, 10 and 100 mg/mL of glucose completely killed the cells after 24 h of treatment. As shown in Figure 4b, 10 mg/mL of arginine resulted in enhanced bactericidal activity.
However, at a glucose concentration of 1 mg/mL, which is similar to the average concentration in human blood [31], the number of viable cells was reduced compared to that in the group without glucose, although only a few cells survived. A few cells survived the addition of 10 mg/mL arginine as well. Next, 10 mg/mL of glucose or arginine was added to the S. sanguinis persisters that formed after the treatment with PCG/GM, and these cells were completely eliminated after 3 h (glucose) and 24 h (arginine) (Figure 5).
Collectively, these results demonstrated the effectiveness of combining glucose or arginine with antibiotics in sterilizing persisters. Furthermore, glucose alone (without antibiotics) did not exhibit bactericidal effects (Supplementary Figure S2), indicating that glucose does not play a direct role in bactericidal activity, but enhances the antimicrobial effects of the drugs on persister cells.

3. Discussion

3.1. Persisters Play a Crucial Role in the Treatment of IE

This study investigated the role of causative bacterial persisters in the antimicrobial treatment of IE, and the risk of recurrence. Specifically, we investigated S. sanguinis, a typical causative agent of IE, and used PCG and GM, which are typical therapeutic agents indicated in treatment guidelines. Although they are not used clinically, glucose or arginine were used with PCG and GM. Glucose in combination may enhance the uptake of an antimicrobial by increasing the proton motive force (PMF) [29]. Arginine may resuscitate persister cells from their dormant state, making them unable to evade the effects of antimicrobial agents [22]. Generally, antibiotics eliminate bacteria in blood vessels, effectively treating the disease; however, there is concern that the presence of persisters, which partially evade the action of antibiotics, can lead to recurrence. Therefore, this study hypothesized that sterilization of the persisters, along with the complete removal of the causative organisms, can cure the infection and reduce the risk of chronicity and recurrence. Previous studies have shown that PCG/GM promotes bactericidal effects through synergistic mechanisms [32]. In this study, PCG/GM was more effective in killing bacteria than either treatment alone. Therefore, the value of combination therapy using the drugs indicated in the guidelines was also demonstrated in this study. However, there was a limited bactericidal effect after 24 h, and a biphasic bactericidal curve was observed, indicating the presence of viable bacteria despite the synergistic effects of the PCG/GM combination treatment (Figure 2). Correspondingly, this biphasic bactericidal curve and the absence of drug-resistance genes (Figure 3) were consistent with previously reported characteristics of persisters [17]. Therefore, this study suggests that persisters may form during the treatment of IE, and that, together with previously reported resistant bacteria [33,34], persisters may make the treatment of infections more challenging.
Next, we examined the elimination of persisters. Previous reports have shown that anticancer agents such as cisplatin and mitomycin C are effective in killing E. coli persisters [35,36]. However, there are concerns about the high burden of these drugs on the human body due to their potent effects. In this study, we sought a substance with a low impact on the human body and, thus, focused on glucose. Glucose, in combination with aminoglycoside antimicrobials, can enhance the bactericidal effect on persister cells by increasing the PMF and uptake of antimicrobial agents. Moreover, a previous study demonstrated that treatment with glucose and GM effectively kills Escherichia coli persisters [29]. Similar results were obtained in the present study with the addition of glucose, which enhanced the bactericidal effect of the antibiotics against S. sanguinis. In particular, the addition of glucose at concentrations above 10 mg/mL resulted in complete sterilization and was extremely effective (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Though the complete mechanism of aminoglycoside uptake is unclear, it is known that a threshold PMF is required. Glucose is transported to the cytoplasm and enters glycolysis, where its catabolism generates nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide. This compound is oxidized by enzymes in the electron transport chain, contributing to PMF. We considered that elevated PMF enhances aminoglycoside uptake and the bactericidal effect [29]. Therefore, the addition of glucose to antibiotic therapy may be an effective strategy for eliminating S. sanguinis persisters formed by antimicrobial agents. A previous study demonstrated that amino acids resuscitate E. coli persister cells from their dormant state [22]. Persister cells resuscitated from dormancy cannot evade the bactericidal effects of antimicrobials, as well as susceptible bacteria. Arginine, an amino acid, is used in the oral cavity primarily to prevent dental caries. S. sanguinis metabolizes arginine through the arginine deiminase pathway to produce citrulline, ornithine, CO2, adenosine triphosphate, and ammonia [30]. This metabolism neutralizes the acidic environment and reduces tooth demineralization. Arginine metabolism could be a trigger to resuscitate the persister state, and the effect of arginine on the bactericidal effect was examined. Addition of 10 mg/mL arginine enhanced the bactericidal effect of the antibiotics against S. sanguinis (Figure 4 and Figure 5). The addition of arginine may also be an effective strategy for eliminating S. sanguinis persister cells formed by antimicrobial agents. However, the enhancement of the bactericidal effect was lower when compared to the same concentration of glucose. Therefore, we believe that adding glucose is a more effective strategy.

3.2. Study Limitations

In this study, we focused on S. sanguinis for the treatment of IE caused by oral bacteria. However, IE is a complex biofilm infection caused by various bacterial species, mainly occurring in the endocardium. Further studies are required to investigate complex biofilms with various bacterial species in antimicrobial therapy in clinical settings. In addition, we found that the addition of glucose at concentrations of 10 mg/mL or higher can enhance the effectiveness of antibiotics and eradicate bacterial populations, including persisters; however, the safety of glucose doses above 10 mg/mL in the human body should be examined, as these doses are much higher than normal blood glucose levels [37], and the treatment lasts 2 to 6 weeks [27]. The maintenance of excessively high blood glucose levels may cause diabetes [38]. In the future, it will be necessary to further examine patients before and after antibiotic treatment to clinically determine the presence of bacteria that escape drug treatment. Furthermore, the details on how glucose works with antibiotics to kill persisters need to be clarified. S. sanguinis can also metabolize other sugars, such as sucrose [39]. Therefore, it is important to verify whether the effectiveness of drug treatments, such as the combination with glucose used in this study (or other carbon sources), can be further enhanced.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Microbial Strains and Culture Medium

S. sanguinis ATCC10556 is held by the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA) as a strain isolated from a patient with subacute bacterial endocarditis [40]. This strain was obtained from ATCC and used as the target bacterium. S. sanguinis was seeded from the glycerol stock onto brain–heart infusion (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) agar plates containing 1% yeast extract (BD) (BHIY), at 37 °C, and incubated for 1 d at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Single colonies were seeded in BHIY broth and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 15 h. BHIY and M9 minimal medium (Na2HPO4·12H2O 15.13 g/L, KH2PO4 3 g/L, NaCl 0.5 g/L, NH4Cl 0.5 g/L, MgSO4·7H2O 246.5 mg/L, and CaCl2·2H2O 14.7 mg/L) were used in the experiment. Na2HPO4·12H2O was obtained from Kishida Chemical Co., Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). KH2PO4, NaCl, NH4Cl, MgSO4·7H2O, and CaCl2·2H2O were obtained from FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Co., Ltd. (Osaka, Japan).

4.2. MIC Measurement

The microliquid dilution method was used to determine the MIC of S. sanguinis against PCG or GM. BHIY was prepared with 4 μg/mL of PCG (Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and 256 μg/mL of GM (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and it was serially diluted twofold on 96-well plates (Iwaki, AGC Techno Glass Co., Ltd., Shizuoka, Japan). Each well was seeded to achieve an absorbance of 0.05 at 600 nm, and then incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 24 h. Growth inhibition was measured at 620 nm using a microplate reader (Multiskan FC, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and the concentration at which growth was significantly inhibited was defined as the MIC. Controls were set at 0 μg/mL. All experiments were conducted with at least three biological replicates.

4.3. Bactericidal Effect of PCG and GM Against S. sanguinis

Overnight cultures of S. sanguinis were reinoculated in fresh BHIY broth and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 until an absorbance of 0.4 at 600 nm was reached. The bacterial pellet was collected by centrifugation at 4000× g for 10 min. The PCG and GM concentrations were determined based on the IE guidelines published by the American Heart Association [28], and on human blood volume [41]. The cells were resuspended in BHIY containing PCG (1600 μg/mL)/GM (64 μg/mL) and incubated for 6, 18, 24, 36, and 48 h. After each incubation, the bacteria were collected, washed twice with PBS, serially diluted tenfold, spotted on BHIY agar plates, and the CFU were measured. Controls were cultured with BHIY only.

4.4. Confirmation of Persistence

S. sanguinis reinoculated culture (OD600 = 0.4) was centrifuged at 4000× g for 10 min. After suspension in BHIY containing PCG (1600 μg/mL)/GM (64 μg/mL), the cells were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Centrifugation was performed at 4000× g for 10 min, and bacterial pellets were collected and washed twice with PBS. Fresh BHIY was added and incubated in an antibiotic-free environment for 24 h (37 °C, 5% CO2). The regrown culture was centrifuged at 4000× g for 10 min, and the bacterial pellet was collected and resuspended in BHIY containing the same concentration of PCG/GM. Following this, the suspension was incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 24 h. After each experiment, the bacteria were collected, washed twice with PBS, serially diluted tenfold, spotted on BHIY agar plates, and the CFU were measured.

4.5. Effect of Glucose and Arginine on S. sanguinis Persisters

Initially, an experiment in which antibiotics and glucose were simultaneously applied was conducted. S. sanguinis reinoculated culture (OD600 = 0.4) was centrifuged at 4000× g for 10 min. The bacterial pellets were resuspended in M9 minimal medium containing PCG (1600 μg/mL)/GM (64 μg/mL) and 1, 10, or 100 mg/mL of glucose (Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) or arginine (725 μg/mL or 10 mg/mL) (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan), and incubated for 6, 18, 24, 36, and 48 h (37 °C, 5% CO2). To accurately determine the effects of glucose and arginine, M9 was used instead of BHIY medium, which is less affected. After each incubation period, the cells were washed twice with PBS, and tenfold serial dilutions were prepared and spotted on BHIY agar plates to measure the CFU. Following this, an experiment was conducted, in which glucose or arginine was applied to the persisters that survived the antibiotic treatment. S. sanguinis cultured under the same conditions was treated with M9 minimal medium containing PCG/GM for 24 h and centrifuged at 4000× g for 10 min to collect the persister cells. The cells were washed twice with PBS and treated with M9 minimal medium containing PCG/GM and glucose or arginine (10 mg/mL). The cells were then incubated for 1, 3, 6, 18, or 24 h. After each incubation period, the cells were washed twice with PBS, tenfold serial dilutions were prepared, spotted on BHIY agar plates, and the CFU were measured. In both experiments, controls were treated with M9 minimal medium containing PCG/GM.

4.6. Statistical Analysis

The statistical tests and sample details are shown in the figure legends. All experiments were repeated at least three times. Error bars indicate the standard deviation from the mean. Microsoft Excel was used to organize raw data and to generate figures. EZR was used for statistical analysis to check the normal distribution of the samples and equal variances, as well as to perform ANOVA and multiple comparisons.

5. Conclusions

This study highlights how persisters may serve as a risk factor that prevents effective antibiotic treatment against S. sanguinis, which is a causative organism of IE. Notably, we revealed that the presence of S. sanguinis persisters prevented complete eradication by antibiotics, while the combination of antimicrobials and glucose effectively eradicated persisters. The S. sanguinis persisters identified in this study suggest that they may cause chronicity and recurrence in IE. Taken together, these findings may guide the development of new treatment strategies for IE caused by oral streptococcal infections.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics14010036/s1, Figure S1: Bactericidal effects of PCG (1600 μg/mL) (a) and GM (64 μg/mL) (b); Figure S2: Growth curve of S. sanguinis cultured in M9 minimal medium with 100 mg/mL of glucose added.

Author Contributions

The authors of this study provided the following contributions: conceptualization, K.M., Y.Y., W.A. and R.Y.; methodology, K.T. and R.Y.; validation, K.T. and R.Y.; formal analysis, K.T. and R.Y.; investigation, K.T. and R.Y.; resources, K.M., Y.Y., W.A. and R.Y.; data curation, R.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, K.T. and R.Y.; writing—review and editing, K.T., K.M., Y.Y., W.A. and R.Y.; visualization, K.T. and R.Y.; supervision, K.M., Y.Y., W.A. and R.Y.; project administration, R.Y.; funding acquisition, R.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by JSPS KAKENHI [Grant Number 24K12888] and Takeda Science Foundation of Japan.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this article are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the study design, collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; the writing of the manuscript; or the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Mokdad, A.H.; Mensah, G.A.; Krish, V.; Glenn, S.D.; Miller-Petrie, M.K.; Lopez, A.D.; Murray, C.J.L. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017, 390, 1211–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Del Giudice, C.; Vaia, E.; Liccardo, D.; Marzano, F.; Valletta, A.; Spagnuolo, G.; Ferrara, N.; Rengo, C.; Cannavo, A.; Rengo, G. Infective endocarditis: A focus on oral microbiota. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Aas, J.A.; Paster, B.J.; Stokes, L.N.; Olsen, I.; Dewhirst, F.E. Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 5721–5732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Caufield, P.W.; Dasanayake, A.P.; Li, Y.; Pan, Y.; Hsu, J.; Hardin, J.M. Natural history of Streptococcus sanguinis in the oral cavity of infants: Evidence for a discrete window of infectivity. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 4018–4023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kuramitsu, H.K.; He, X.; Lux, R.; Anderson, M.H.; Shi, W. Interspecies interactions within oral microbial communities. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2007, 71, 653–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhu, B.; Macleod, L.C.; Kitten, T.; Xu, P. Streptococcus sanguinis biofilm formation & interaction with oral pathogens. Future Microbiol. 2018, 13, 915–932. [Google Scholar]
  7. Baker, S.P.; Nulton, T.J.; Kitten, T. Genomic, phenotypic, and virulence analysis of Streptococcus sanguinis oral and infective-endocarditis isolates. Infect. Immun. 2019, 87, 10.1128/iai.00703-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Rajani, R.; Klein, J.L. Infective endocarditis: A contemporary update. Clin. Med. 2020, 20, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Murdoch, D.R.; Corey, G.R.; Hoen, B.; Miró, J.M.; Fowler, V.G.; Bayer, A.S.; Karchmer, A.W.; Olaison, L.; Pappas, P.A.; Moreillon, P. Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: The International Collaboration on Endocarditis–Prospective Cohort Study. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009, 169, 463–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lockhart, P.B.; Brennan, M.T.; Sasser, H.C.; Fox, P.C.; Paster, B.J.; Bahrani-Mougeot, F.K. Bacteremia associated with toothbrushing and dental extraction. Circulation 2008, 117, 3118–3125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Habib, G.; Lancellotti, P.; Antunes, M.J.; Bongiorni, M.G.; Casalta, J.-P.; Del Zotti, F.; Dulgheru, R.; El Khoury, G.; Erba, P.A.; Iung, B. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: The task force for the management of infective endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). Eur. Heart J. 2015, 36, 3075–3128. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Calderón-Parra, J.; Kestler, M.; Ramos-Martínez, A.; Bouza, E.; Valerio, M.; de Alarcón, A.; Luque, R.; Goenaga, M.Á.; Echeverría, T.; Fariñas, M.C.; et al. Clinical factors associated with reinfection versus relapse in infective endocarditis: Prospective cohort study. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hobby, G.L.; Meyer, K.; Chaffee, E. Observations on the Mechanism of Action of Penicillin. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1942, 50, 281–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lewis, K. Persister cells: Molecular mechanisms related to antibiotic tolerance. In Antibiotic Resistance; Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 211, pp. 121–133. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wood, T.K.; Song, S.; Yamasaki, R. Ribosome dependence of persister cell formation and resuscitation. J. Microbiol. 2019, 57, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kaldalu, N.; Hauryliuk, V.; Turnbull, K.J.; La Mensa, A.; Putrinš, M.; Tenson, T. In vitro studies of persister cells. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2020, 84, 10.1128/mmbr.00070-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Balaban, N.Q.; Helaine, S.; Lewis, K.; Ackermann, M.; Aldridge, B.; Andersson, D.I.; Brynildsen, M.P.; Bumann, D.; Camilli, A.; Collins, J.J.; et al. Definitions and guidelines for research on antibiotic persistence. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 441–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huemer, M.; Mairpady Shambat, S.; Brugger, S.D.; Zinkernagel, A.S. Antibiotic resistance and persistence—Implications for human health and treatment perspectives. EMBO Rep. 2020, 21, e51034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Moyed, H.S.; Bertrand, K.P. hipA, a newly recognized gene of Escherichia coli K-12 that affects frequency of persistence after inhibition of murein synthesis. J. Bacteriol. 1983, 155, 768–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Fisher, R.A.; Gollan, B.; Helaine, S. Persistent bacterial infections and persister cells. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 15, 453–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Grassi, L.; Di Luca, M.; Maisetta, G.; Rinaldi, A.C.; Esin, S.; Trampuz, A.; Batoni, G. Generation of persister cells of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus by chemical treatment and evaluation of their susceptibility to membrane-targeting agents. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yamasaki, R.; Song, S.; Benedik, M.J.; Wood, T.K. Persister Cells Resuscitate Using Membrane Sensors that Activate Chemotaxis, Lower cAMP Levels, and Revive Ribosomes. iScience 2020, 23, 100792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, W.; Yamasaki, R.; Song, S.; Wood, T.K. Interkingdom signal indole inhibits Pseudomonas aeruginosa persister cell waking. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 127, 1768–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Leung, V.; Ajdic, D.; Koyanagi, S.; Lévesque, C.M. The formation of Streptococcus mutans persisters induced by the quorum-sensing peptide pheromone is affected by the LexA regulator. J. Bacteriol. 2015, 197, 1083–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Li, P.; Fung, Y.M.E.; Yin, X.; Seneviratne, C.J.; Che, C.M.; Jin, L. Controlled cellular redox, repressive hemin utilization and adaptive stress responses are crucial to metronidazole tolerance of Porphyromonas gingivalis persisters. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2018, 45, 1211–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nakamura, Y.; Watanabe, K.; Yoshioka, Y.; Ariyoshi, W.; Yamasaki, R. Persister Cell Formation and Elevated lsrA and lsrC Gene Expression upon Hydrogen Peroxide Exposure in a Periodontal Pathogen Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Nakatani, S.; Ohara, T.; Ashihara, K.; Izumi, C.; Iwanaga, S.; Eishi, K.; Okita, Y.; Daimon, M.; Kimura, T.; Toyoda, K.; et al. JCS 2017 guideline on prevention and treatment of infective endocarditis. Circ. J. 2019, 83, 1767–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Baddour, L.M.; Wilson, W.R.; Bayer, A.S.; Fowler Jr, V.G.; Tleyjeh, I.M.; Rybak, M.J.; Barsic, B.; Lockhart, P.B.; Gewitz, M.H.; Levison, M.E. Infective endocarditis in adults: Diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: A scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015, 132, 1435–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Allison, K.R.; Brynildsen, M.P.; Collins, J.J. Metabolite-enabled eradication of bacterial persisters by aminoglycosides. Nature 2011, 473, 216–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Nascimento, M.M. Potential Uses of Arginine in Dentistry. Adv. Dent. Res. 2018, 29, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Freckmann, G.; Hagenlocher, S.; Baumstark, A.; Jendrike, N.; Gillen, R.C.; Rossner, K.; Haug, C. Continuous glucose profiles in healthy subjects under everyday life conditions and after different meals. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2007, 1, 695–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Pericas, J.M.; Nathavitharana, R.; Garcia-de-la-Maria, C.; Falces, C.; Ambrosioni, J.; Almela, M.; Garcia-Gonzalez, J.; Quintana, E.; Marco, F.; Moreno, A.; et al. Endocarditis Caused by Highly Penicillin-Resistant Viridans Group Streptococci: Still Room for Vancomycin-Based Regimens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e01113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Matsuo, T.; Mori, N.; Sakurai, A.; Kanie, T.; Mikami, Y.; Uehara, Y.; Furukawa, K. Effectiveness of daptomycin against infective endocarditis caused by highly penicillin-resistant viridans group streptococci. IDCases 2021, 24, e01113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Turner, N.A.; Sharma-Kuinkel, B.K.; Maskarinec, S.A.; Eichenberger, E.M.; Shah, P.P.; Carugati, M.; Holland, T.L.; Fowler Jr, V.G. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: An overview of basic and clinical research. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 203–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chowdhury, N.; Wood, T.L.; Martinez-Vazquez, M.; Garcia-Contreras, R.; Wood, T.K. DNA-crosslinker cisplatin eradicates bacterial persister cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2016, 113, 1984–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kwan, B.W.; Chowdhury, N.; Wood, T.K. Combatting bacterial infections by killing persister cells with mitomycin C. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 17, 4406–4414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee; ElSayed, N.A.; Aleppo, G.; Bannuru, R.R.; Bruemmer, D.; Collins, B.S.; Ekhlaspour, L.; Gaglia, J.L.; Hilliard, M.E.; Johnson, E.L.; et al. 2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care 2024, 47, S20–S42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Galicia-Garcia, U.; Benito-Vicente, A.; Jebari, S.; Larrea-Sebal, A.; Siddiqi, H.; Uribe, K.B.; Ostolaza, H.; Martin, C. Pathophysiology of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yoshida, Y.; Konno, H.; Nagano, K.; Abiko, Y.; Nakamura, Y.; Tanaka, Y.; Yoshimura, F. The influence of a glucosyltransferase, encoded by gtfP, on biofilm formation by Streptococcus sanguinis in a dual-species model. APMIS 2014, 122, 951–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kilian, M.; Mikkelsen, L.; Henrichsen, J. Taxonomic Study of Viridans Streptococci: Description of Streptococcus gordonii sp. nov. and Emended Descriptions of Streptococcus sanguis (White and Niven 1946), Streptococcus oralis (Bridge and Sneath 1982), and Streptococcus mitis (Andrewes and Horder 1906). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1989, 39, 471–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nadler, S.B.; Hidalgo, J.U.; Bloch, T. Prediction of blood volume in normal human adults. Surgery 1962, 51, 224–232. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of penicillin G (PCG) (a) and gentamicin (GM) (b) against S. sanguinis in brain–heart infusion broth with yeast extract (BHIY). BHIY broth included different concentrations of PCG and GM, which were incubated for 24 h, and the absorbance was measured at 620 nm. Error bars indicate the standard deviation from at least three biological replicates. ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons was used to compare the controls with the other groups. (** p < 0.01).
Figure 1. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of penicillin G (PCG) (a) and gentamicin (GM) (b) against S. sanguinis in brain–heart infusion broth with yeast extract (BHIY). BHIY broth included different concentrations of PCG and GM, which were incubated for 24 h, and the absorbance was measured at 620 nm. Error bars indicate the standard deviation from at least three biological replicates. ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons was used to compare the controls with the other groups. (** p < 0.01).
Antibiotics 14 00036 g001
Figure 2. Bactericidal effects of combined PCG (1600 µg/mL)/GM (64 µg/mL) treatment against S. sanguinis in the exponential phase. CFU were measured at 0, 6, 18, 24, 36, and 48 h. Error bars indicate the standard deviation across at least three biological replicates (the experiments were performed in cultures from different single colonies).
Figure 2. Bactericidal effects of combined PCG (1600 µg/mL)/GM (64 µg/mL) treatment against S. sanguinis in the exponential phase. CFU were measured at 0, 6, 18, 24, 36, and 48 h. Error bars indicate the standard deviation across at least three biological replicates (the experiments were performed in cultures from different single colonies).
Antibiotics 14 00036 g002
Figure 3. Persister formation in S. sanguinis following PCG/GM treatment and recovery in BHIY medium. After treatment with PCG (1600 μg/mL)/GM (64 μg/mL) for 24 h, the medium was changed to BHIY only, and cells were incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 24 h. The regrown S. sanguinis was retreated with the same concentration of PCG/GM for 24 h. Error bars indicate the standard deviation across at least three biological replicates.
Figure 3. Persister formation in S. sanguinis following PCG/GM treatment and recovery in BHIY medium. After treatment with PCG (1600 μg/mL)/GM (64 μg/mL) for 24 h, the medium was changed to BHIY only, and cells were incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 24 h. The regrown S. sanguinis was retreated with the same concentration of PCG/GM for 24 h. Error bars indicate the standard deviation across at least three biological replicates.
Antibiotics 14 00036 g003
Figure 4. Bactericidal effect of PCG (1600 μg/mL)/GM (64 μg/mL) on S. sanguinis in M9 minimal medium following the addition of glucose (1, 10, or 100 mg/mL) (a) and arginine (725 μg/mL or 10 mg/mL) (b). The CFU were measured at 0, 6, 18, 24, 36, and 48 h. Error bars indicate the standard deviation from at least three biological replicates. N.D. indicates not detected.
Figure 4. Bactericidal effect of PCG (1600 μg/mL)/GM (64 μg/mL) on S. sanguinis in M9 minimal medium following the addition of glucose (1, 10, or 100 mg/mL) (a) and arginine (725 μg/mL or 10 mg/mL) (b). The CFU were measured at 0, 6, 18, 24, 36, and 48 h. Error bars indicate the standard deviation from at least three biological replicates. N.D. indicates not detected.
Antibiotics 14 00036 g004
Figure 5. Bactericidal effects of glucose and arginine on S. sanguinis persister cells after PCG/GM treatment. Cells were incubated with M9 minimal medium and treated with PCG (1600 μg/mL)/GM (64 μg/mL) for 24 h. Following this, the cells were washed with PBS and retreated with the same concentration of PCG/GM in M9 minimal medium containing 10 mg/mL of glucose or arginine. Error bars indicate the standard deviation from at least three biological replicates. N.D. indicates not detected.
Figure 5. Bactericidal effects of glucose and arginine on S. sanguinis persister cells after PCG/GM treatment. Cells were incubated with M9 minimal medium and treated with PCG (1600 μg/mL)/GM (64 μg/mL) for 24 h. Following this, the cells were washed with PBS and retreated with the same concentration of PCG/GM in M9 minimal medium containing 10 mg/mL of glucose or arginine. Error bars indicate the standard deviation from at least three biological replicates. N.D. indicates not detected.
Antibiotics 14 00036 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Takada, K.; Yoshioka, Y.; Morikawa, K.; Ariyoshi, W.; Yamasaki, R. Glucose Supplementation Enhances the Bactericidal Effect of Penicillin and Gentamicin on Streptococcus sanguinis Persisters. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14010036

AMA Style

Takada K, Yoshioka Y, Morikawa K, Ariyoshi W, Yamasaki R. Glucose Supplementation Enhances the Bactericidal Effect of Penicillin and Gentamicin on Streptococcus sanguinis Persisters. Antibiotics. 2025; 14(1):36. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14010036

Chicago/Turabian Style

Takada, Kazuya, Yoshie Yoshioka, Kazumasa Morikawa, Wataru Ariyoshi, and Ryota Yamasaki. 2025. "Glucose Supplementation Enhances the Bactericidal Effect of Penicillin and Gentamicin on Streptococcus sanguinis Persisters" Antibiotics 14, no. 1: 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14010036

APA Style

Takada, K., Yoshioka, Y., Morikawa, K., Ariyoshi, W., & Yamasaki, R. (2025). Glucose Supplementation Enhances the Bactericidal Effect of Penicillin and Gentamicin on Streptococcus sanguinis Persisters. Antibiotics, 14(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14010036

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop