Next Article in Journal
Impact of Tigecycline’s MIC in the Outcome of Critically Ill Patients with Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Bacteraemia Treated with Tigecycline Monotherapy—Validation of 2019′s EUCAST Proposed Breakpoint Changes
Previous Article in Journal
Phage Therapy: Towards a Successful Clinical Trial
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 9
Issue 11
10.3390/antibiotics9110826
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Plasmid-Mediated Ampicillin, Quinolone, and Heavy Metal Co-Resistance among ESBL-Producing Isolates from the Yamuna River, New Delhi, India

by
Mohammad Tahir Siddiqui
1,
Aftab Hossain Mondal
1,
Firdoos Ahmad Gogry
1,
Fohad Mabood Husain
2,
Ali Alsalme
3 and
Qazi Mohd. Rizwanul Haq
1,*
1
Department of Biosciences, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India
2
Department of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2020, 9(11), 826; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9110826
Submission received: 13 October 2020 / Revised: 12 November 2020 / Accepted: 18 November 2020 / Published: 19 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Mechanism and Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Antibiotic resistance is one of the major current global health crises. Because of increasing contamination with antimicrobials, pesticides, and heavy metals, the aquatic environment has become a hotspot for emergence, maintenance, and dissemination of antibiotic and heavy metal resistance genes among bacteria. The aim of the present study was to determine the co-resistance to quinolones, ampicillin, and heavy metals among the bacterial isolates harboring extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) genes. Among 73 bacterial strains isolated from a highly polluted stretch of the Yamuna River in Delhi, those carrying blaCTX-M, blaTEM, or blaSHV genes were analyzed to detect the genetic determinants of resistance to quinolones, ampicillin, mercury, and arsenic. The plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) gene qnrS was found in 22 isolates; however, the qnrA, B, C, and qnrD genes could not be detected in any of the bacteria. Two variants of CMY, blaCMY-2 and blaCMY-42, were identified among eight and seven strains, respectively. Furthermore, merB, merP, merT, and arsC genes were detected in 40, 40, 44, and 24 bacterial strains, respectively. Co-transfer of different resistance genes was also investigated in a transconjugation experiment. Successful transconjugants had antibiotic and heavy metal resistance genes with similar tolerance toward antibiotics and heavy metals as did their donors. This study indicates that the aquatic environment is a major reservoir of bacteria harboring resistance genes to antibiotics and heavy metals and emphasizes the need to study the genetic basis of resistant microorganisms and their public health implications.

1. Introduction

Ever since their discovery, antibiotics have provided many benefits in fields ranging from healthcare to agriculture. However, the emergence of antibiotic resistance has significantly reduced their efficacy and usefulness in treating humans and animals. Emergence of antibiotic resistance among microorganisms is associated with many complex metabolic and genetic factors. Among them, extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC β-lactamases, and plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) genes are major factors in resistance to a variety of drugs [1,2,3]. ESBLs are one of the most important mechanisms providing resistance against large numbers of life-saving drugs. CTX-M, TEM, and SHV are the most common type of ESBLs identified in microorganisms [3,4]. Similarly, AmpC β-lactamases is a very important enzyme playing a crucial role in resistance development. Bacteria over expressing AmpC β-lactamases are generally resistant to large numbers of β-lactam antibiotics. CMY-1 was the first reported plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamase in 1989 [5]. Among a large number of variants, CMY-2 is the most common found among bacteria [6]. CMY-42 is another important variant of CMY-2 with increased activity against extended-spectrum antibiotics [7]. Plasmid-mediated transfer of AmpC β-lactamase genes is highly efficient in disseminating resistance to other microorganisms by horizontal gene transfer [8,9]. Bacterial strains carrying PMQR genes are among major factor in the decreasing efficacy of quinolones against human and animal infections [10]. PMQR genes are a set of six qnr genes (qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrD, qnrS, and qnrVC) that encode gyrase-protection repetitive peptides [11,12], the aminoglycoside and quinolone-inactivating acetyl-transferase encoding aac(6′)-Ib-cr gene [11] and efflux pumps encoding genes qaqBIII, oqxAB, and qepA [13]. A number of PMQR genes, e.g., qnrA, qnrS, and aac(6′)-Ib-cr have been detected among clinically important bacteria from poultry and aquatic ecosystems [14,15,16].
In addition to antibiotics, other pollutants such as heavy metals, pesticides, and detergents also contribute significantly for the development of antibiotic resistance [17,18,19]. Countries like India are witnessing extensive industrial and urban development processes, which frequently cause the contaminations of surface water by heavy metals (e.g., mercury and arsenic) and other pollutants. The Delhi stretch of river Yamuna receives the pollutants from domestic, agriculture, and hospital discharges. Furthermore, a number of sewage and wastewater treatment plants also released the contamination to Yamuna. Studies on water and soil quality of Delhi stretch of river Yamuna showed a significantly high concentration of various antibiotics and heavy metals in river water including mercury and arsenic [20,21]. The maintenance of heavy metals like mercury and arsenic in aquatic environments could help bacteria in acquisition of metal resistance determinants located on the chromosome or plasmids [22]. Reports from the United States, the Netherlands, India, and Australia suggested the occurrence of heavy metal resistance among bacterial isolates [23,24,25,26]. Different resistance determinants are responsible for conferring resistance to heavy metals, e.g., mer and ars operon genes are responsible for resistance against mercury and arsenic, respectively [27]. It is also evident from reports that heavy metal resistance genes could be co-located on the same plasmids as those of antibiotic-resistance genes. Thus, the presence of heavy metals in the environment may exert a selective pressure towards bacteria carrying these mobile genetic elements [28,29]
Highly polluted aquatic ecosystems accommodate a diverse population of bacteria and further provide optimum conditions for development and propagation of resistance to antibiotics and heavy metals. Such aquatic environments could be termed hot spots of resistant microorganisms. ESBLs, AmpC, and PMQR are known to be responsible for resistance against a large number of crucial drugs for the treatment of life-threatening infections. Co-existence of these resistance mechanisms among bacteria from freshwater sources could be very concerning. However, there are only a few studies that report the co-occurrence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBLs), AmpC, PMQR, and heavy metal resistance determinants among water borne bacteria [30,31]. More studies in different settings and diverse geographical areas are needed for better information about antibiotics and heavy metal co-resistance. Thus, the present study was designed to identify the co-existence and co-transfer of PMQR, AmpC, mercury, and arsenic resistance determinants among bacterial strains carrying various ESBL genes from the Yamuna River, Delhi (India).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Features of the Included Bacterial Strains

The ESBL-producing bacterial stains (n = 73) harboring blaCTX-M and/or blaTEM, and/or blaSHV genes were selected for the present study from well-characterized bacteria previously reported by Siddiqui et al. [32]. All the ESBL-producing bacterial strains were isolated from the 10 different sites of highly polluted stretch of river Yamuna, Delhi, India (Supplementary Table S1). Bacterial strains were identified using amplification followed by sequencing and analysis of 16S rRNA gene. CTX-M, TEM, and SHV were presented among 73, 58, and 19 isolates respectively. Antibiotic resistance phenotype and genotype of ESBL-producing bacterial strains are shown in Supplementary Table S2 and Figure 1. All the cultures were preserved in 60% (v/v) glycerol at −80 °C. For subsequent experiments, bacterial strains were revived in Luria broth following overnight incubation and shaking at 37 °C and 120 rpm.

2.2. Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing and Multiple Antibiotic Resistance (MAR) Index

Antibiotic susceptibility testing of all the 73 test strains was repeated toward different classes of antibiotics using the Kirby Bauer disk diffusion technique as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI 2016). Seventeen different antibiotics used in the study included: amikacin (30 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), ampicillin/sulbactam (10/10 μg), piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10 μg), cefazolin (30 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg), imipenem (10 μg), polymyxin-B (300 units), aztreonam (30 μg), trimethoprim (5 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), and ceftriaxone (30 μg) (all from HiMedia, India). After overnight incubation at 37 °C, zone of inhibition was measured, susceptibility pattern was determined, and bacterial strains were classified into resistant, intermediate, and sensitive with the help of CLSI guidelines. The multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) index of each isolate was calculated as described by Krumperman [33]. The overall resistance of a single isolate towards 17 tested antibiotics is represented as multiple antibiotic resistance index (MAR Index). The MAR index is risk assessment tool that helps in differentiation of high- and low-risk region where antimicrobial drugs has been overused. An MAR index > 0.2 indicates the overuse of antimicrobial drugs and high selection pressure in the river, whereas MAR index < 0.2, indicates the low risk of source contamination in the river.

2.3. Plasmid DNA Isolation and Amplification

Plasmid DNA was extracted by the alkaline lysis method [34]. Extracted plasmid DNA was used as a template and PCR amplification was carried for all the genes using specific sets of primers (Table 1). PCR amplification of antibiotics and heavy metal resistance genes was carried out in a 50 μL reaction volume, comprising 5 μL of 10× buffer, 3 μL of 25 mM MgCl2, 1 μL of 10 mM dNTP mix, 1 μM of each forward and reverse primer, 2U of Taq-polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and 2 μL (30 ng/μL) of template DNA. For each PCR, initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min was done, followed by 35 cycles of: denaturation (94 °C for 1 min), annealing (respective Tm of primer for 1 min), extension (72 °C for 1 min), and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. In order to check the positive amplification, PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel (GENEI, Bengaluru, India). Gels were further visualized and photographed in a gel documentation system (BIO-RAD, Hercules, CA, USA). Amplicon sizes of different genes were checked using a 100 bp DNA molecular weight marker as reference (Fermentas, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.4. Detection and Characterization of blaCMY and PMQR Genes

All the bacterial strains were screened for the existence of plasmid-mediated blaCMY and PMQR (qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrD, qnrS, and aac(6′)-Ib) genes with the help of specific sets of primers (Table 1). Purified PCR products were sequenced with corresponding gene primers (SciGenom Labs, Kochi, Kerala, India). Nucleotide sequences were analyzed by FinchTV software (Geospiza, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA), and the BioEdit program (http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/bioedit/bioedit.html) was used to check homology of gene sequences with already available GenBank sequences. Variants of different genes were determined using the NCBI Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) and homology analysis.

2.5. Detection of Heavy Metal Resistance Genes

All the test isolates were checked for the possible co-occurrence of heavy metal (mercury and arsenic) resistance genes. Occurrence of heavy metal resistance determinants were checked with plasmid DNA as a template and specific sets of primers (Table 1). Mercury resistance genes, e.g., merB, merP, and merT, were amplified by the protocol described by Azam et al. [40]. Similarly, the arsenic resistance gene arsC was amplified as per the method of Sunita et al. [25]. PCR products were run on a 1% agarose gel to determine positive amplification.

2.6. Susceptibility towards Heavy Metals

Heavy metal tolerance was recorded among bacterial strains harboring any mercury and/or arsenic resistance determinants. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of mercuric chloride (HgCl2) was determined against the strains carrying mer genes, whereas the MIC of sodium arsenate (Na2HAsO4) was recorded in bacteria positive for the arsC gene. Methods described by Sunita et al. and Figueiredo et al. were used to check the tolerance of bacteria against heavy metal concentrations [25,41]. Briefly, Serial dilutions (1 mg/L to 512 mg/L) of heavy metal salts were prepared in 96 well microtiter plate containing 200 μL of Luria broth. Medium was inoculated with 100 μL of 10,000 times diluted 0.1 OD600 culture of each isolate and incubated at 37 °C at 120 rpm for 14–18 h in an automated incubator shaker. The OD of samples was measured in a microplate reader (Thermo Scientific MultiskanGo, Waltham, MA, USA) at 600 nm wavelength, and MIC was determined. E. coli ATCC 25922 strains was used as negative control. Media without heavy metal salt was also served as control.

2.7. Conjugation Experiment

A conjugation experiment was carried out to determine the transferability of antibiotic and metal resistance genes (blaCTX-M, blaTEM, blaSHV, blaCMY, PMQR, merB, merP, merT, and arsC). Seven different isolates, namely, E. coli MKT3, Acinetobacter junii IBT29, Enterobacter cloacae BVT29, E. coli MBT29, K. pneumoniae MBT50, E. coli CCT42, and Acinetobacter sp. BOT40, harboring antibiotic and heavy metal resistance determinants were chosen as donors. Plasmid-free Escherichia coli J53 strain resistant to sodium azide and sensitive to antibiotics and heavy metal used in this study was selected as recipient. Transconjugation experiment was performed by the help of protocol described by Zurfluh et al. [31]. In brief, secondary cultures of donor and recipient bacterial isolates were mixed in a 1:1 ratio in Luria–Bertani broth (HiMedia, Mumbai, India) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h without any shaking. Serial dilutions of transconjugant bacteria were streaked on LA plates containing cefotaxime (2 μg/mL) and sodium azide (100 μg/mL). After overnight incubation, transconjugant colonies were selected and revived for the plasmid isolation. PCR-based amplification using transconjugant plasmids as templates was carried out to detect the successful transfer of antibiotic and heavy metal resistance determinants.
MIC of ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, mercuric chloride (HgCl2), and sodium arsenate (Na2HAsO4) against donors and transconjugants were further determined.

2.8. Accession Numbers

The DNA sequences of the qnrS gene were deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers MH426935-MH426956 (No. 22). Complete gene sequences of blaCMY-2 and blaCMY-42 were deposited under the accession numbers MH426957-MH426964 (No. 8) and MH426965-MH426971 (No. 7).

3. Results

The present study was aimed to study the co-occurrence of PMQR, blaCMY, and heavy metal resistance genes among bacterial strains harboring ESBL genes collected from the highly polluted Yamuna River. Detailed results of this work are discussed below.

3.1. Susceptibility Profile of Test Strains

All the 73 bacterial strains were exposed to 17 different antibiotics to analyze their susceptibility patterns by the help of CLSI-2016 guidelines and classified into resistant, intermediate, and susceptible strains. Terms resistant, intermediate, and sensitive have been recommended by the CLSI (clinical laboratory standard institute) for the classification of bacteria on the basis of antibiotic susceptibility. “Resistant” are the organisms, which could resist the effect of prescribed dosage concentration of antibiotics, “intermediate” are those bacteria, which are on the course to be resistant to prescribed drug concentration, and “sensitive” are those, which could not resist the prescribed concentration of antibiotics. Analysis of antibiotic profiling found that the majority of test strains were resistant to ceftazidime (62/73), followed by cefotaxime (59/73), cefazolin (50/73), ceftriaxone (46/73), ampicillin (45/73), aztreonam (44/73), cefoxitin (35/73), trimethoprim (28/73), piperacillin/tazobactam (25/73), polymyxin B (23/73), ciprofloxacin (22/73), ampicillin/sulbactam (15/73), levofloxacin (11/73), amikacin (11/73), tetracycline (10/73), chloramphenicol (6/73), and imipenem (4/73) (Supplementary Table S2). Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of all the tested strains are shown in Figure 1. The multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) index of different bacteria was found to be in the range of 0.941–0.058. The MAR index of all tested bacterial strains is shown in Table 2.

3.2. Detection and Characterization of blaCMY and PMQR Genes

Alkaline lysis method was used to extract the plasmid DNA from all the tested bacterial strains. In order to confirm the presence of plasmid, extracted genetic material from all the strains were subjected to 16S rRNA gene amplification, since this gene is known to be located on chromosomal DNA, it does not amplify by the plasmid as a template. Non-amplification of 16S rRNA gene confirmed the presence of plasmid DNA among 73 tested bacterial isolates.
Of 73 bacterial strains, 15 (20.5%) harbored the blaCMY gene. Nucleotide sequence analysis revealed the presence of two variants, blaCMY-2 and blaCMY-42. blaCMY-2 was found and characterized among eight strains, whereas blaCMY-42 was identified in seven bacteria (Table 2). Furthermore, PMQR genes (qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrD, qnrS, and aac(6′)-Ib) were amplified and only qnrS was detected among 22 bacterial strains. Nucleotide sequences of all the 22 amplified products were analyzed for their homology with previously submitted sequences and submitted to NCBI GenBank database. The qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrD, and aac(6′)-Ib genes could not be detected among any of the bacterial strains. The distribution pattern of antibiotic resistance genes is presented in Table 2.

3.3. Detection of Heavy Metal Resistance Genes

All the 73 bacterial strains were checked for the presence of heavy metal resistance genes on their plasmid DNA. Mercury resistance genes merB, merP, and merT were detected among 40, 40, and 43 strains, respectively (Table 2). Furthermore, the arsenic resistance gene arsC was successfully amplified among 24 strains (Table 2). Distribution patterns of heavy metal resistance genes among test strains are shown in Table 2. Combinations of different antibiotics and heavy metals resistance genes are presented in Figure 2.

3.4. Susceptibility to Heavy Metals

All the bacterial strains carrying any of the respective metal resistance genes were studied to determine their tolerance toward HgCl2 or Na2HAsO4.Isolates harboring any of the mer genes showed tolerance to HgCl2 in the range of <1 to 8 mg/L. The MIC of Na2HAsO4 was in the range of 16 to >512 mg/L against the strains carrying the arsC gene (Table 2).

3.5. Conjugation Experiments

In vitro conjugation experiments were carried out with seven strains, E. coli MKT3, Acinetobacter junii IBT29, Enterobacter cloacae BVT29, E. coli MBT29, K. pneumoniae MBT50, E. coli CCT42, and Acinetobacter sp. BOT40, all harboring maximum numbers of antibiotic and heavy metal resistance genes. Transconjugants were successfully obtained on cefotaxime-supplemented Luria agar plates. Conjugation efficiencies were recorded for E. coli MKT3, Acinetobacter junii IBT29, Enterobacter cloacae BVT29, E. coli MBT29, K. pneumoniae MBT50, E. coli CCT42, and Acinetobacter sp. BOT40 transconjugant as 3.9 × 10−3, 2.1 × 10−3, 2.6 × 10−3, 5 × 10−3, 2.1× 10−3, 6.7× 10−3, and 1.6 × 10−2, respectively. Plasmid analysis of recipient E. coli J53AZR revealed that donor isolates were able to co-transfer the antibiotic and heavy metal resistance determinates such as CTX-M, TEM, qnrS, CMY, and mer via conjugation (Table 3). The arsC gene could not be detected in any of the transconjugants. The MIC of ampicillin, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin, HgCl2, and Na2HAsO4 was determined against transconjugants and was similar to that of their donor bacterial strains (Table 3).

4. Discussion

In the present study, we investigated the presence of PMQR, blaCMY, and heavy metal resistance genes among bacterial strains harboring ESBL genes collected from the highly polluted Yamuna River [32]. The most important finding of this work was co-occurrence of antibiotic and heavy metal resistance determinants among bacterial strains and their co-transfer to the host strain.
Our work highlights the importance of the resistance gene pool and its interaction with diverse groups of bacteria in the urban aquatic environment. In the present work, we studied the co-existence of PMQR, AmpC, and heavy metal resistance determinants among bacterial strains of aquatic origin harboring ESBL genes. The horizontal transfer of different resistance genes was also determined with conjugation experiments. One of the very important aspects of this study was the co-occurrence of different antibiotic and heavy metal resistance determinants among tested bacterial strains of aquatic origin.
Domestic, hospital, municipal, industrial and agricultural wastes continuously increase the pollution level of urban aquatic bodies. This high degree of pollution creates selection pressure for the emergence, dissemination, and maintenance of antibiotic and heavy metal resistance among aquatic microorganisms. Studies on water and soil quality of the Delhi stretch of the Yamuna River showed a significantly high concentration of various antibiotics and heavy metals in river water [20,21]. Furthermore, the incidence of antibiotic and heavy metal resistance determinants among microorganisms from polluted aquatic environments is significant [9,32,42,43,44].
In the present study, our test strains had a very high level of resistance to β-lactam antibiotics. Antibiotic profiling of 73 tested bacterial strains showed elevated resistance toward ceftazidime (84.9%), followed by cefotaxime (80.8%), cefazolin (68.4%), ceftriaxone (63%), ampicillin (61.6%), aztreonam (60.2%), and cefoxitin (47.9%). However, bacterial strains were found to be very sensitive to imipenem (5.4% resistance). A similar resistance pattern for β-lactam antibiotics was recorded by Lu et al. from an urban river habitat in China [45]. Moreover, our results are also in line with other studies reporting a high level of resistance against β-lactam and non-β-lactam antibiotics [46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. This study found 34.2% and 20.5% resistance toward piperacillin + tazobactam and ampicillin + sulbactam combinations, respectively. A study by Lu et al. also found similar resistance patterns against combinations of antibiotic and β-lactamase inhibitors among ESBL producers [45]. A varied resistance pattern was found against non-β-lactam antibiotics, e.g., trimethoprim (38.5%), polymyxin B (31.5%), ciprofloxacin (30.1%), levofloxacin (15%), amikacin (15%), tetracycline (13.6%), and chloramphenicol (8.2%). Our results correspond with those in a study on hospital wastewater in Vietnam, which showed similar resistance patterns to antimicrobials [53]. The MAR index of each bacterial strain used in the study was determined and was in the range of 0.941–0.058. We found the MAR index greater than 0.2 among 84.9% of strains. MAR index values greater than 0.2 suggests a high-risk source of contamination [33,47,54].
Plasmid-mediated CIT type AmpC β-lactamase was successfully amplified among 20.5% of bacterial strains. Bajaj et al., Martinez-Medina et al., and Loncaric et al. also reported the similar occurrence of AmpC-type β-lactamase among bacterial isolates from river water and patient samples, respectively [9,52,55]. Furthermore, sequence analysis revealed the occurrence of blaCMY-2 and blaCMY-42 among 8 and 7 strains, respectively. Among CIT type AmpC β-lactamases, blaCMY-2 is one of the most common variants reported in various studies [56,57]. blaCMY-42 is one of the variants of blaCMY-2 evolved by substitution of val231Ser [7,9]. Presence of the blaCMY-42 gene among aquatic isolates is a serious issue because it confers a high level of resistance against third-generation cephalosporins and monobactams.
Quinolone and β-lactam antibiotics are very common drugs for the treatment of various infections. Thus, the co-occurrence of resistance toward both of these drugs could pose a serious public health concern [14,15]. PMQR genes are major contributors in conferring resistance toward fluoroquinolone drugs [10,11]. Six different PMQR genes (qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrD, qnrS, and aac(6′)-Ib) were checked for their occurrence among bacterial strains with ESBL genes. Successful amplification of the qnrS gene was observed among 30.1% of tested strains. None of the isolates was positive for qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrD, and aac(6′)-Ib. Sequence homology analysis of partial genes revealed 100% similarity with the already available qnrS gene in the NCBI GenBank database. Our results are in accordance with the study of Bajaj et al., where 50% of CTX-M-producing isolates were positive for the qnrS gene [14]. Co-occurrence of PMQR and other antibiotic resistance genes has been reported in similar studies from China, Iran, and Austria [55,58,59]. The presence of PMQR genes among bacteria is a cause for concern, because these resistance genes are thought to create an optimum environment for selection of chromosomal resistance determinants [60,61]. This could pose a further serious health risk to human and animal populations. It is imperative to increase the scope of surveillance studies of drug-resistant bacteria to the genotypic level so that identification of the cause of resistance can be determined accurately.
Occurrence of mercury resistance genes (merB, merP and merT) and the arsenic resistance gene (arsC) was determined among ESBL-positive strains. In the present study, we observed the presence of merB, merP, and merT genes among 54.7%, 54.7%, and 58.95% of tested bacteria, respectively. The genes merB, merP, and merT are known to play a crucial role in the emergence of mercury resistance, but the combined action of all the genes of the mer operon exerts broad-spectrum resistance among microorganisms [62]. Studies among environmental bacteria from the United States and Brazil also reported the presence of mer operon genes in significantly high percentages [63,64]. Co-occurrence of antibiotic and mercury resistance gene was also reported by many studies carried out in India and Australia [40,65]. All the strains positive for at least one mer gene were tested for their tolerance toward mercuric chloride. The MIC of mercuric chloride was found in the range of <1 to 8 mg/L. Azam et al. and Rebello et al. also reported a similar tolerance pattern among bacterial isolates of river origin [40,64]. Various genes are known to be responsible for conferring arsenic resistance among bacteria. arsC is one of the key genes determining arsenic resistance by reducing arsenate to arsenite [66]. In this study, we observed the occurrence of the arsC gene on the plasmid DNA of 32.8% of bacteria. Di Cesare et al. reported the occurrence of arsC genes among antibiotic-resistant bacteria obtained from wastewater in Italy [43]. Other studies among bacterial isolates of environmental origin also showed the presence of the arsC gene in abundance [25,43,67]. In determining the MIC of sodium arsenate against the isolates harboring the arsC gene, we found that bacterial isolates were able to tolerate 16 to > 512 mg/L concentration of sodium arsenate. Studies on arsenic-tolerant bacteria carried out in India and Indonesia also showed the similar MICs of sodium arsenate [68,69]. Our results are in agreement with the previous studies on characterization of the arsC gene among bacteria in India and Italy [25,67,70].
We performed a conjugation experiment to check the possible horizontal transfer of antibiotic and heavy metal resistance genes. An in vitro conjugation experiment in this study revealed that bacterial strains E. coli MKT3, Acinetobacter junii IBT29, Enterobacter cloacae BVT29, E. coli MBT29, K. pneumoniae MBT50, E. coli CCT42, and Acinetobacter sp. BOT40 successfully transferred antibiotic and heavy metal-resistant genes to recipient E. coli J53AZR. We did not find the presence of arsC gene in any of the transconjugants, which showed the possibility of presence of this gene on other non-conjugative plasmid. This result of conjugation experiment suggests the possibility of resistance gene transfer between different bacteria in environmental settings. The transfer of resistance determinants in the aquatic environment could significantly enhance the opportunity for pathogens to acquire resistance [71]. Our data corroborate those in the study conducted by Liu et al., in which successful transfer of various drug resistance genes was carried out through transconjugation [72]. A study conducted among bacterial isolates from wastewater in Italy has also suggested a co-selection of resistance genes of antibiotics and heavy metals [43]. Because antibiotic and heavy metal resistance genes are known to be located on a similar gene cluster, and also on the same conjugative plasmids, it is imperative to further explore the possible mechanisms of heavy metal-driven emergence and dissemination of drug resistance.

5. Conclusions

Waterborne bacterial strains carrying ESBL genes were found to harbor resistance determinants for AmpC β-lactamase, PMQR, mercury resistance, and arsenic resistance. The presence of resistance genes for such a large number of antimicrobial agents is a serious cause for concern. Detection of blaCMY-2 and blaCMY-42 is also very significant because these determinants confer increased resistance against cephalosporins and monobactams. Furthermore, coexistence and plasmid-mediated co-transfer of antibiotic and heavy metal resistance genes is a very serious issue. It warrants the deeper and large-scale study on molecular mechanisms of these resistance genes in different settings. Moreover, it is also very important to unravel the role of environmental factors influencing the emergence and dissemination resistance among microorganisms. Study also emphasizes the stern need of regulation on the use of various antimicrobial and heavy metal substances, which helps in the creation of selection pressure responsible for the rise of resistance.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/9/11/826/s1, Table S1: Water samples collection sites of river Yamuna from where bacterial strains were isolated, Table S2: Bacterial strains used in this study with corresponding ESBLs genes and their antibiotics profiling.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.T.S. and Q.M.R.H.; methodology, M.T.S. and A.H.M.; data curation, M.T.S., A.H.M. and F.A.G.; writing, review, and editing, M.T.S., A.H.M., F.M.H., A.A. and Q.M.R.H.; formal analysis, M.T.S., F.A.G., F.M.H. and A.A.; funding acquisition, M.T.S., F.M.H., A.A. and Q.M.R.H.; resources, M.T.S. and Q.M.R.H.; supervision, Q.M.R.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors M.T.S. and F.A.G. wish to acknowledge University Grants Commission (UGC) and Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), India, for financial support in the form of fellowship respectively A.H.M. also acknowledges CSIR, India, for providing a Research Associateship, Researchers Support Project (RSP-2020/78), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Philippon, A.; Arlet, G.; Jacoby, G.A. Plasmid-determined AmpC-type beta-lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Hopkins, K.L.; Davies, R.H.; Threlfall, E.J. Mechanisms of quinolone resistance in Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Recent developments. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2005, 25, 358–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bradford, P.A. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in the 21st century: Characterization, epidemiology, and detection of this important resistance threat. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2001, 14, 933–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Fasciana, T.; Gentile, B.; Aquilina, M.; Ciammaruconi, A.; Mascarella, C.; Anselmo, A.; Fortunato, A.; Fillo, S.; Petralito, G.; Lista, F.; et al. Co-existence of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance in new Klebsiella pneumoniae clones emerging in south of Italy. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Bauernfeind, A.; Chong, Y.; Schweighart, S. Extended broad spectrum beta-lactamase in Klebsiella pneumoniae including resistance to cephamycins. Infection 1989, 17, 316–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jacoby, G.A. AmpC beta-lactamases. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 22, 161–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Hentschke, M.; Kotsakis, S.D.; Wolters, M.; Heisig, P.; Miriagou, V.; Aepfelbacher, M. CMY-42, a novel plasmid-mediated CMY-2 variant AmpC beta-lactamase. Microb. Drug Resist. 2011, 17, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, X.; Lou, D.; Xu, Y.; Shang, Y.; Li, D.; Huang, X.; Li, Y.; Hu, L.; Wang, L.; Yu, F. First identification of coexistence of blaNDM-1 and blaCMY-42 among Escherichia coli ST167 clinical isolates. BMC Microbiol. 2013, 13, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Bajaj, P.; Singh, N.S.; Kanaujia, P.K.; Virdi, J.S. Distribution and molecular characterization of genes encoding CTX-M and AmpC β-lactamases in Escherichia coli isolated from an Indian urban aquatic environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 505, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hooper, D.C.; Jacoby, G.A. Topoisomerase Inhibitors: Fluoroquinolone mechanisms of action and resistance. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2016, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Robicsek, A.; Jacoby, G.A.; Hooper, D.C. The worldwide emergence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2006, 6, 629–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Fonseca, E.L.; Vicente, A.C.P. Epidemiology of qnrVC alleles and emergence out of the Vibrionaceae family. J. Med. Microbiol. 2013, 62, 1628–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Nakaminami, H.; Noguchi, N.; Sasatsu, M. Fluoroquinolone efflux by the plasmid-mediated multidrug efflux pump QacB variant QacBIII in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 4107–4111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Bajaj, P.; Kanaujia, P.K.; Singh, N.S.; Sharma, S.; Kumar, S.; Virdi, J.S. Quinolone co-resistance in ESBL- or AmpC-producing Escherichia coli from an Indian urban aquatic environment and their public health implications. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2016, 23, 1954–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cattoir, V.; Poirel, L.; Rotimi, V.; Soussy, C.J.; Nordmann, P. Multiplex PCR for detection of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance qnr genes in ESBL-producing enterobacterial isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2007, 60, 394–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Caruso, G.; Giammanco, A.; Cardamone, C.; Oliveri, G.; Mascarella, C.; Capra, G.; Fasciana, T. Extra-intestinal fluoroquinolone-resistant escherichia coli strains isolated from meat. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 8714975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alonso, A.; Sánchez, P.; Martínez, J.L. Environmental selection of antibiotic resistance genes. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Baker-Austin, C.; Wright, M.S.; Stepanauskas, R.; McArthur, J.V. Co-selection of antibiotic and metal resistance. Trends Microbiol. 2006, 14, 176–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ji, X.; Shen, Q.; Liu, F.; Ma, J.; Xu, G.; Wang, Y.; Wu, M. Antibiotic resistance gene abundances associated with antibiotics and heavy metals in animal manures and agricultural soils adjacent to feedlots in Shanghai; China. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 235, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sehgal, M.; Garg, A.; Suresh, R.; Dagar, P. Heavy metal contamination in the Delhi segment of Yamuna basin. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012, 184, 1181–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mutiyar, P.K.; Mittal, A.K. Occurrences and fate of selected human antibiotics in influents and effluents of sewage treatment plant and effluent-receiving river Yamuna in Delhi (India). Environ. Monit. Assess. 2014, 186, 541–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jackson, R.W.; Vinatzer, B.; Arnold, D.L.; Dorus, S.; Murillo, J. The influence of the accessory genome on bacterial pathogen evolution. Mob. Genet. Elem. 2011, 1, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Slots, J.; Feik, D.; Rams, T.E. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterobacteriaceae, pseudomonadaceae and acinetobacter in human periodontitis. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 1990, 5, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Klasen, H.J. A historical review of the use of silver in the treatment of burns. II. Renewed interest for silver. Burn. J. Int. Soc. Burn Inj. 2000, 26, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sunita, M.S.L.; Prashant, S.; Bramha Chari, P.V.; Nageswara Rao, S.; Balaravi, P.; Kavi Kishor, P.B. Molecular identification of arsenic-resistant estuarine bacteria and characterization of their ars genotype. Ecotoxicology 2012, 21, 202–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Knapp, C.W.; Callan, A.C.; Aitken, B.; Shearn, R.; Koenders, A.; Hinwood, A. Relationship between antibiotic resistance genes and metals in residential soil samples from Western Australia. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 2484–2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hobman, J.L.; Crossman, L.C. Bacterial antimicrobial metal ion resistance. J. Med. Microbiol. 2015, 64, 471–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gupta, A.; Phung, L.T.; Taylor, D.E.; Silver, S. Diversity of silver resistance genes in IncH incompatibility group plasmids. Microbiology 2001, 147, 3393–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Johnson, T.J.; Siek, K.E.; Johnson, S.J.; Nolan, L.K. DNA sequence and comparative genomics of pAPEC-O2-R, an avian pathogenic Escherichia coli transmissible R plasmid. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 4681–4688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Tacão, M.; Moura, A.; Correia, A.; Henriques, I. Co-resistance to different classes of antibiotics among ESBL-producers from aquatic systems. Water Res. 2014, 48, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zurfluh, K.; Abgottspon, H.; Hächler, H.; Nüesch-Inderbinen, M.; Stephan, R. Quinolone resistance mechanisms among extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Escherichia coli isolated from rivers and lakes in Switzerland. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e95864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Siddiqui, M.T.; Mondal, A.H.; Sultan, I.; Ali, A.; Haq, Q.M.R. Co-occurrence of ESBLs and silver resistance determinants among bacterial isolates inhabiting polluted stretch of river Yamuna, India. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 16, 5611–5622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Krumperman, P.H. Multiple antibiotic resistance indexing of Escherichia coli to identify high-risk sources of fecal contamination of foods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1983, 46, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Birnboim, H.C.; Doly, J. A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979, 7, 1513–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Kim, H.B.; Park, C.H.; Kim, C.J.; Kim, E.C.; Jacoby, G.A.; Hooper, D.C. Prevalence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants over a 9-year period. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 639–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Wang, M.; Guo, Q.; Xu, X.; Wang, X.; Ye, X.; Wu, S.; Hooper, D.C.; Wang, M. New plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance gene, qnrC, found in a clinical isolate of Proteus mirabilis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 1892–1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Cavaco, L.M.; Hasman, H.; Xia, S.; Aarestrup, F.M. qnrD, a novel gene conferring transferable quinolone resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky and Bovismorbificans strains of human origin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 603–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Chen, X.; Zhang, W.; Pan, W.; Yin, J.; Pan, Z.; Gao, S.; Jiao, X. Prevalence of qnr, aac(6′)-Ib-cr, qepA, and oqxAB in Escherichia coli isolates from humans, animals, and the environment. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 3423–3427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Pérez-Pérez, F.J.; Hanson, N.D. Detection of plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamase genes in clinical isolates by using multiplex PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002, 40, 2153–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Azam, M.; Jan, A.T.; Haq, Q.M. blaCTX-M-152, a novel variant of CTX-M-group-25, identified in a study performed on the prevalence of multidrug resistance among natural inhabitants of River Yamuna, India. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Figueiredo, N.L.; Canário, J.; Duarte, A.; Serralheiro, M.L.; Carvalho, C. Isolation and characterization of mercury-resistant bacteria from sediments of Tagus Estuary (Portugal): Implications for environmental and human health risk assessment. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 2014, 77, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chen, H.; Shu, W.; Chang, X.; Chen, J.-a.; Guo, Y.; Tan, Y. The profile of antibiotics resistance and integrons of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing thermotolerant coliforms isolated from the Yangtze River basin in Chongqing. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158, 2459–2464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. di Cesare, A.; Eckert, E.M.; D’Urso, S.; Bertoni, R.; Gillan, D.C.; Wattiez, R.; Corno, G. Co-occurrence of integrase 1, antibiotic and heavy metal resistance genes in municipal wastewater treatment plants. Water Res. 2016, 94, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kannan, S.K.; Krishnamoorthy, R. Isolation of mercury resistant bacteria and influence of abiotic factors on bioavailability of mercury—A case study in Pulicat Lake North of Chennai, South East India. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 367, 341–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lu, S.Y.; Zhang, Y.L.; Geng, S.N.; Li, T.Y.; Ye, Z.M.; Zhang, D.S.; Zou, F.; Zhou, H.W. High diversity of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing bacteria in an urban river sediment habitat. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 5972–5976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Siddiqui, K.; Mondal, A.; Siddiqui, M.T.; Azam, M.; Rizwanul, Q. Prevalence and molecular characterization of ESBL producing enterobacteriaceae from highly polluted stretch of River Yamuna, India. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Lett. 2018, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Mondal, A.H.; Siddiqui, M.T.; Sultan, I.; Haq, Q.M.R. Prevalence and diversity of blaTEM, blaSHV and blaCTX-M variants among multidrug resistant Klebsiella spp. from an urban riverine environment in India. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2019, 29, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gogry, F.A.; Siddiqui, M.T.; Haq, Q.M.R. Emergence of mcr-1 conferred colistin resistance among bacterial isolates from urban sewage water in India. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2019, 26, 33715–33717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Harada, K.; Shimizu, T.; Mukai, Y.; Kuwajima, K.; Sato, T.; Usui, M.; Tamura, Y.; Kimura, Y.; Miyamoto, T.; Tsuyuki, Y.; et al. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of antimicrobial resistance in klebsiella spp. isolates from companion animals in Japan: Clonal dissemination of multidrug-resistant extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing klebsiella pneumoniae. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Ojer-Usoz, E.; González, D.; Vitas, A.I.; Leiva, J.; García-Jalón, I.; Febles-Casquero, A.; Escolano, M.D.L.S. Prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in meat products sold in Navarra, Spain. Meat Sci. 2013, 93, 316–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lenart-Boroń, A. Antimicrobial resistance and prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase genes in Escherichia coli from major rivers in Podhale, southern Poland. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 14, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Martinez-Medina, M.; Strozzi, F.; Castillo, B.R.D.; Serrano-Morillas, N.; Bustins, N.F.; Martínez-Martínez, L. Antimicrobial resistance profiles of adherent invasive escherichia coli show increased resistance to β-lactams. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lien, T.Q.; Lan, P.T.; Chuc, N.T.K.; Hoa, N.Q.; Nhung, P.H.; Thoa, N.T.M.; Diwan, V.; Tamhankar, A.J.; Lundborg, C.S. Antibiotic resistance and antibiotic resistance genes in escherichia coli isolates from hospital wastewater in vietnam. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Chitanand, M.P.; Kadam, T.A.; Gyananath, G.; Totewad, N.D.; Balhal, D.K. Multiple antibiotic resistance indexing of coliforms to identify high risk contamination sites in aquatic environment. Indian J. Microbiol. 2010, 50, 216–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Loncaric, I.; Misic, D.; Szostak, M.P.; Künzel, F.; Schäfer-Somi, S.; Spergser, J. Broad-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant and/or fluoroquinolone-resistant enterobacterales associated with canine and feline urogenital infections. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Deshpande, L.M.; Jones, R.N.; Fritsche, T.R.; Sader, H.S. Occurrence of plasmidic AmpC type beta-lactamase-mediated resistance in Escherichia coli: Report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (North America, 2004). Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2006, 28, 578–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Oteo, J.; Pérez-Vázquez, M.; Campos, J. Extended-spectrum [beta]-lactamase producing Escherichia coli: Changing epidemiology and clinical impact. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2010, 23, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Li, L.; Wang, B.; Feng, S.; Li, J.; Wu, C.; Wang, Y.; Ruan, X.; Zeng, M. Prevalence and characteristics of extended-spectrum β-lactamase and plasmid-mediated fluoroquinolone resistance genes in Escherichia coli isolated from chickens in Anhui province, China. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e104356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Mood, E.H.; Meshkat, Z.; Izadi, N.; Rezaei, M.; Amel Jamehdar, S.; Nasab, M.N. Prevalence of quinolone resistance genes among extended-spectrum B-lactamase-producing escherichia coli in Mashhad, Iran. Jundishapur J. Microbiol. 2015, 8, e16217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Poirel, L.; Pitout, J.D.; Calvo, L.; Rodriguez-Martinez, J.M.; Church, D.; Nordmann, P. In vivo selection of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli isolates expressing plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance and expanded-spectrum beta-lactamase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006, 50, 1525–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Rodríguez-Martínez, J.M.; Velasco, C.; García, I.; Cano, M.E.; Martínez-Martínez, L.; Pascual, A. Mutant Prevention Concentrations of Fluoroquinolones for Enterobacteriaceae Expressing the Plasmid-Carried Quinolone Resistance Determinant qnrA1. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Boening, D.W. Ecological effects, transport, and fate of mercury: A general review. Chemosphere 2000, 40, 1335–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kothari, A.; Soneja, D.; Tang, A.; Carlson, H.K.; Deutschbauer, A.M.; Mukhopadhyay, A. Native plasmid-encoded mercury resistance genes are functional and demonstrate natural transformation in environmental bacterial isolates. mSystems 2019, 4, e00588-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. de Luca Rebello, R.C.; Machado Gomes, K.; Duarte, R.S.; Tavora Coelho da Costa Rachid, C.; Rosado, A.S.; Regua-Mangia, A.H. Diversity of mercury resistant Escherichia coli strains isolated from aquatic systems in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Int. J. Biodivers. 2013, 2013, 265356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Skippington, E.; Ragan, M. Lateral genetic transfer and the construction of genetic exchange communities. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 35, 707–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Rosen, B.P. Biochemistry of arsenic detoxification. FEBS Lett. 2002, 529, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Kaur, S.; Kamli, M.R.; Ali, A. Diversity of arsenate reductase genes (arsC Genes) from arsenic-resistant environmental isolates of E. coli. Curr. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Selvankumar, T.; Radhika, R.; Mythili, R.; Arunprakash, S.; Srinivasan, P.; Govarthanan, M.; Kim, H. Isolation, identification and characterization of arsenic transforming exogenous endophytic Citrobacter sp. RPT from roots of Pteris vittata. 3 Biotech 2017, 7, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Titah, H.S.; Abdullah, S.R.S.; Idris, M.; Anuar, N.; Basri, H.; Mukhlisin, M.; Tangahu, B.V.; Purwanti, I.F.; Kurniawan, S.B. Arsenic Resistance and Biosorption by Isolated Rhizobacteria from the Roots of Ludwigia octovalvis. Int. J. Microbiol. 2018, 2018, 3101498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Firrincieli, A.; Presentato, A.; Favoino, G.; Marabottini, R.; Allevato, E.; Stazi, S.R.; Mugnozza, G.S.; Harfouche, A.; Petruccioli, M.; Turner, R.J.; et al. Identification of Resistance Genes and Response to Arsenic in Rhodococcus aetherivorans BCP1. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Martinez, J.L. Environmental pollution by antibiotics and by antibiotic resistance determinants. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157, 2893–2902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Liu, X.; Thungrat, K.; Boothe, D.M. Occurrence of OXA-48 carbapenemase and other β-Lactamase genes in ESBL-producing multidrug resistant escherichia coli from dogs and cats in the United States, 2009–2013. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Antibiotics 09 00826 g001 550
Figure 1. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) producing bacterial strains used in this study. Note 1: AMP, ampicillin; CAZ, ceftazidime; CTX, cefotaxime; CZ, cefazolin; CTR, ceftriaxone; AT, aztreonam; CX, cefoxitin; TR, trimethoprim; P/T-piperacillin/tazobactam, PB, polymyxin B; CIP, ciprofloxacin; A/S, ampicillin/sulbactam; LE, levofloxacin; AK, amikacin; TE, tetracycline; C, chloramphenicol; IPM-imipenem. Note 2: “Resistant”—Bacteria which could resist the effect of prescribed dosage concentration of antibiotic. “Intermediate”—Bacteria on its course to be resistant to prescribed concentration of antibiotic. “Sensitive”—Bacteria, which could not resist the prescribed dosage concentration of antibiotic.
Figure 1. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) producing bacterial strains used in this study. Note 1: AMP, ampicillin; CAZ, ceftazidime; CTX, cefotaxime; CZ, cefazolin; CTR, ceftriaxone; AT, aztreonam; CX, cefoxitin; TR, trimethoprim; P/T-piperacillin/tazobactam, PB, polymyxin B; CIP, ciprofloxacin; A/S, ampicillin/sulbactam; LE, levofloxacin; AK, amikacin; TE, tetracycline; C, chloramphenicol; IPM-imipenem. Note 2: “Resistant”—Bacteria which could resist the effect of prescribed dosage concentration of antibiotic. “Intermediate”—Bacteria on its course to be resistant to prescribed concentration of antibiotic. “Sensitive”—Bacteria, which could not resist the prescribed dosage concentration of antibiotic.
Antibiotics 09 00826 g001
Antibiotics 09 00826 g002 550
Figure 2. Percentage of bacterial strains harboring different resistance genes.
Figure 2. Percentage of bacterial strains harboring different resistance genes.
Antibiotics 09 00826 g002
Table
Table 1. Primers used for amplification of different genes.
Table 1. Primers used for amplification of different genes.
GenePrimer SequenceProduct SizeReferences
merB5′-ATGAAGCTCGCCCCATATATTTTA-3′
5′-TCACGGTGTCCTAGATGACATGGT-3′		640 bpThis study
merP5′-ATGAAGAAACTGTTTGCCTCCCTT-3′
5′-TCACTGCTTGACGCTGGACG GA-3′		272 bpThis study
merT5′-TTAATAGAAAAATGGAACGACATA-3′
5′-ATGTCTGAACCACAAAACGGG CG3′		355 bpThis study
arsC5′-GTAATACGCTGGAGATGATCCG-3
5′-TTTTCCTGCTTCATCAACGAC-3′		409 bp[25]
qnrA5′-TGTATTTCGCTGTTGCTGGGGAG-3′
5′-AAGTGACCAGAATAAGCGGC-3′		580 bp[15]
qnrB5′-ATG GTG ACA AAG AGA GTG CA-3′
5′-GTT CTG TTG CGG CTG GGT AA -3′		476 bp[35]
qnrC5′-GGGTTGTACATTTATTGAATC-3′
5′-TCCACTTTACGAGGTTCT-3′		447 bp[36]
qnrD5′-CGAGATCAATTTACGGGGAATA-3′
5′-AACAAGCTGAAGCGCCTG-3′		582 bp[37]
qnrS5′-GCCTGTGTTTCGCTGCTGTT-3′
5′-AGTAAGTCACCAGAACGAGC-3′		428 bp[15]
aac(6′)-Ib5′-TTGCGATGCTCTATGAGTGGCTA-3′
5′-CTCGAATGCCTGGCGTGTTT-3′		482 bp[38]
blaCMY5′-ATGAGTATTCAACATTTCCG-3′
5′-CCAATGCTTAATCAGTGAGG-3′		1226 bp[39]
Table
Table 2. Antibiotic and heavy metal resistance genes among tested bacterial isolates and their corresponding minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs).
Table 2. Antibiotic and heavy metal resistance genes among tested bacterial isolates and their corresponding minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs).
StrainsESBLs Genes (from Previous Study)MAR IndexPMQR GeneblaCMY GeneHeavy Metal Resistance GenesMIC
merBmerPmerTarsCHgCl2 (mg/L)Na2HAsO4 (mg/L)
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus SRT58CTX-M-150.588qnrS-+--<1-
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus CCT66CTX-M-150.647------
Acinetobacter johnsonii BOT41CTX-M-1520.411------
Acinetobacter schindleri BOT46CTX-M-150.235+++-<1-
Acinetobacter schindleri CCT65CTX-M-15, CTX-M-152, TEM-1160.294CMY-2-++-2-
Acinetobacter sp. BOT44CTX-M-152, TEM-1160.352------
Acinetobacter sp. BOT40CTX-M-15, TEM-1160.529CMY-2+-++2>512
Acinetobacter sp. CCT53CTX-M-15, CTX-M-152, TEM-1160.176+++-8-
Acinetobacter sp. CCT54CTX-M-15, TEM-1160.058++++4>512
Acinetobacter sp. CCT59CTX-M-15, CTX-M-152 ‘TEM-1810.235------
Acinetobacter sp. MKT43CTX-M-15, TEM-1160.588qnrS+++-8-
Acinetobacter sp. MKT45CTX-M-15, CTX-M-152, SHV-120.529qnrS-+--<1-
Acinetobacter sp. MKT46CTX-M-150.235-++-1-
Acinetobacter sp. MKT48CTX-M-15, CTX-M-152, SHV-420.411CMY-2+++-8-
Acinetobacter sp. SRT63CTX-M-152, TEM-1160.117+-+-<1-
Acinetobacter sp. SRT64CTX-M-30.529CMY-42-+--<1-
Acinetobacter sp. SRT65CTX-M-150.529qnrS+-+-1-
Acinetobacter sp. RBT26CTX-M-15, CTX-M-152, TEM-1160.470CMY-2+++-<1-
Acinetobacter junii IBT27CTX-M-150.294++++4256
Acinetobacter junii IBT29CTX-M-15, TEM-1160.705qnrSCMY-42-++-4-
Acinetobacter junii IBT30CTX-M-15, CTX-M-152, TEM-1160.294-+--<1-
Acinetobacter junii IBT31CTX-M-15, CTX-M-1520.235-+--<1-
Acinetobacter junii IBT33CTX-M-15, CTX-M-152, TEM-141, SHV-120.294qnrS++++164
Acinetobacter junii IBT36CTX-M-15, TEM-1160.117+++-2-
Acinetobacter junii IBT39CTX-M-150.529CMY-2+++-2-
Acinetobacter junii IBT40CTX-M-15, CTX-M-152, TEM-1160.117------
Acinetobacter junii RBT31CTX-M-15, CTX-M-152, SHV-120.352+++-4-
Bacillus altitudinis BOT30CTX-M-15, TEM-1160.176+-+-<1-
Bacillus firmus BOT39CTX-M-15, CTX-M-1520.235--+-<1-
Bacillus firmus MBT57CTX-M-15, TEM-1160.352-+--1-
Bacillus firmus WBT16CTX-M15, TEM-1160.235+-+-<1-
Bacillus safensis MKT35CTX-M-15, TEM-1160.235+++-8-
Bacillus safensis BVT32CTX-M-152, TEM-1160.295++++4>512
Brachymonas chironomi MKT44CTX-M-15, CTX-M-152, TEM-116, SHV-120.529qnrSCMY-42+++-8-
E. coli MKT3CTX-M-15, TEM-116, SHV-120.411qnrSCMY-42-+-+8>512
E. coli MKT25CTX-M-15, TEM-1160.588qnrS-+-+4>512
E. coli BVT8CTX-M-15, TEM-1160.529qnrS------
E. coli BVT20CTX-M-15, SHV-120.880qnrS+--+<1128
E. coli RBT1CTX-M-150.705+++-2-
E. coli IBT13CTX-M-15, TEM-116, SHV-120.941qnrS+-++264
E. coli SRT41CTX-M-15, TEM-1160.470CMY-2+-+-1-
E. coli MBT16CTX-M-150.529qnrSCMY-2------
E. coli MBT29CTX-M-150.880qnrSCMY-42++-+232
E. coli MBT42CTX-M-15, TEM-116, SHV-120.176+--+<164
E. coli CCT7CTX-M-15, TEM-1160.880qnrS------
E. coli CCT42CTX-M-15, TEM-1160.823qnrS+-++4512
E. coli CCT43CTX-M-15, TEM-1160.176------
E. coli CCT50CTX-M-150.529-+++8>512
E. coli CCT64CTX-M-15, CTX-M-152, TEM-1160.176++++4128
E. coli BOT1CTX-M-150.235------
Enterobacter cloacae BVT22CTX-M-15, TEM-116, SHV-120.352------
Enterobacter cloacae BVT29CTX-M-15, CTX-M-152, TEM-116, SHV-120.705qnrS++++8>512
Enterobacter cloacae BVT34CT-M-15, TEM-1160.235------
Enterobacter cloacae GCT36CTX-M-150.647CMY-42---+-256
Enterobacter cloacae MBT49CTX-M-15, CTX-M-152, TEM-1160.294------
Enterobacter cloacae CCT13CTX-M-150.764qnrS------
Enterobacter sp. BVT30CTX-M-50.235++++8512
Enterobacter sp. BOT45CTX-M-15, CTX-M-1520.176++++1>512
K. pneumoniae RBT40CTX-M-15, CTX-M-1520.294++++8>512
K. pneumoniae MBT43CTX-M-15, TEM-1160.235+-+-4-
K. pneumoniae MBT50CTX-M-150.705qnrSCMY-42+-+-2-
K. pneumoniae MBT51CTX-M-15, TEM-1160.235++++4>512
K. pneumoniae MBT52CTX-M-15, SHV-120.294+++-8-
K. pneumoniae MBT59CTX-M-15, CTX-M-152, TEM-1160.117qnrS+++-2-
K. quasipneumoniae MKT39CTX-M-3, TEM-1160.470+-+-<1-
Kluyvera georgiana CCT51CTX-M-150.235++++8>512
Kluyvera georgiana CCT69CT-M-152, TEM-1160.588------
Shigella flexneri RBT20CTX-M-15, TEM-1160.705qnrS-+++116
Shigella flexneri IBT7CTX-M-15, TEM-1160.705qnrSCMY-2------
Shigella sonnei MKT34CTX-M-15, TEM-1160.176---+-64
Shigella flexneri CCT27CX-M-15, TEM-116, SHV-120.235------
Shigella flexneri CCT52CTX-M-15, CTX-M-1520.235+++-8-
Serratia marcescens RBT37CTX-M-15, TEM-1160.294++++8>512
Table
Table 3. Distribution of antibiotics and heavy metal resistance genes among transconjugants and their Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC)s.
Table 3. Distribution of antibiotics and heavy metal resistance genes among transconjugants and their Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC)s.
Bacterial StrainsResistance GenesMIC
CTX-MTEMSHVqnrSCMYmerBmerPmerTarsCAmpicillin
(µg/mL)		Ciprofloxacin
(µg/mL)		Cefotaxime
(µg/mL)		HgCl2
(mg/L)		Na2HAsO4
(mg/L)
E. coli MKT3+++++−+−+>102464>10248>512
Transconjugant (J53AZR)++−+−−+−−512181024232
Acinetobacter junii IBT29++−++−++−12832256464
Transconjugant (J53AZR)++−++−+−−3216256232
Enterobacter cloacae BVT29++++−++++256322568>512
Transconjugant (J53AZR)++++−+++−256832832
E. coli MBT29+−−++++−+>1024>1024>1024232
Transconjugant (J53AZR)+−−++−−−−256256512132
K. pneumoniae MBT50+−−+++−+−12816512232
Transconjugant (J53AZR)+−−++−−+−1288512132
E. coli CCT42++−+−+−++>1024256>10244512
Transconjugant (J53AZR)++−−−+−−−51264256232
Acinetobacter sp. BOT40++−−++−++3281282>512
Transconjugant (J53AZR)++−−+−−+−324128232
Note: Escherichia coli J53 strain used as recipient for transconjugation was sensitive to all the tested antibiotics and heavy metal in this study.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Siddiqui, M.T.; Mondal, A.H.; Gogry, F.A.; Husain, F.M.; Alsalme, A.; Haq, Q.M.R. Plasmid-Mediated Ampicillin, Quinolone, and Heavy Metal Co-Resistance among ESBL-Producing Isolates from the Yamuna River, New Delhi, India. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 826. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9110826

AMA Style

Siddiqui MT, Mondal AH, Gogry FA, Husain FM, Alsalme A, Haq QMR. Plasmid-Mediated Ampicillin, Quinolone, and Heavy Metal Co-Resistance among ESBL-Producing Isolates from the Yamuna River, New Delhi, India. Antibiotics. 2020; 9(11):826. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9110826

Chicago/Turabian Style

Siddiqui, Mohammad Tahir, Aftab Hossain Mondal, Firdoos Ahmad Gogry, Fohad Mabood Husain, Ali Alsalme, and Qazi Mohd. Rizwanul Haq. 2020. "Plasmid-Mediated Ampicillin, Quinolone, and Heavy Metal Co-Resistance among ESBL-Producing Isolates from the Yamuna River, New Delhi, India" Antibiotics 9, no. 11: 826. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9110826

APA Style

Siddiqui, M. T., Mondal, A. H., Gogry, F. A., Husain, F. M., Alsalme, A., & Haq, Q. M. R. (2020). Plasmid-Mediated Ampicillin, Quinolone, and Heavy Metal Co-Resistance among ESBL-Producing Isolates from the Yamuna River, New Delhi, India. Antibiotics, 9(11), 826. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9110826

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop