Next Article in Journal
Tribology of 2D Nanomaterials: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Droplet Impact on the Cold Elastic Superhydrophobic Membrane with Low Ice Adhesion
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Element Penetration Region on Adhesion and Corrosion Performance of Ni-Base Coatings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nanoscale Correlations of Ice Adhesion Strength and Water Contact Angle
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Coatings
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/coatings10090896
coatings-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fabrication of a Porous Slippery Icephobic Surface and Effect of Lubricant Viscosity on Anti-Icing Properties and Durability

by
Guoyong Liu
1,
Yuan Yuan
2,*,
Ruijin Liao
1,
Liang Wang
2 and
Xue Gao
2
1
State Key Laboratory of Power Transmission Equipment & System Security and New Technology, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
2
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2020, 10(9), 896; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10090896
Submission received: 30 August 2020 / Revised: 15 September 2020 / Accepted: 16 September 2020 / Published: 18 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Low Ice Adhesion Coatings)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A breakdown caused by the icing of power generation infrastructure is one of the serious disasters occurring in the power system. Slippery lubricant-infused porous surfaces (SLIPSs), whose ice adhesion strength is extremely low, have a promising application in the anti-icing field. In the present study, we fabricated SLIPSs with low ice adhesion strength by infusing silicone oil into an anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) substrate. In addition, the effects of the viscosity of silicone oil on the anti-icing properties and durability of the SLIPSs were investigated. The results show that a lower viscosity silicone oil brings about more slippery surfaces and lower ice adhesion strength. The ice adhesion strength was reduced by 99.3% in comparison with the bare Al alloy. However, low-viscosity silicone oil has worse de-icing resistance and heat resistance. Additionally, the porous films filled with low-viscosity silicone oil possess a better self-healing property after icing/de-icing cycles and followed by exposure to the atmosphere. When the viscosity of silicone oil is 50 mPa·s, the SLIPSs exhibit the best durability for anti-icing. Even after 21 de-icing tests or 168 h of heating at 90 °C, the ice adhesion strength still remains below 10% compared with that of bare Al. This work provides some useful advice for the design and fabrication of anti-icing SLIPSs.

1. Introduction

The accumulation of ice on aluminum conductors can cause disastrous problems, such as line breaking and tower collapse, due to the increased weight overloading the structures [1,2]. Over the past few decades, icing problems have received much attention in the fields of science and engineering. Conventional strategies to solve icing problems included removing ice from conductors before failure occurs, such as overcurrent ice-melting and mechanical de-icing [3,4]. However, these methods have low efficiency and high energy consumption and can even damage the equipment [5,6]. Materials that can prevent ice accumulation without energy input have been widely studied [7,8].
Inspired by the idea of the lotus effect, superhydrophobic surfaces have shown promise as anti-icing materials because the cooled water could roll away from the surfaces [9,10]. However, recent reports have indicated that superhydrophobicity would be lost if water vapor condensed on the micro-nanostructure of superhydrophobic surfaces under conditions of low temperature with high humidity [11]. Additionally, the mechanical interlocking effect between the ice and the micro-nanostructure of superhydrophobic surfaces has led to an increase in the ice adhesion strength [12,13].
Low ice adhesion materials are a hopeful anti-icing strategy where the ice automatically detaches from the surface by gravity [14,15]. Recently, slippery lubricant-infused porous surfaces (SLIPSs) were considered as promising anti-icing materials, which were inspired by Nepenthes pitcher plants [8,16]. SLIPSs have excess lubricant infused into the pores, resulting in the liquid layer on the top. Researchers have prepared many SLIPS materials because of their potential applications, such as self-cleaning [17], anti-corrosion [18,19], anti-frosting [20,21] and anti-icing [19,22] features. Additionally, the lubricant layer on the SLIPS displays slippery properties leading to a minimized adhesion between the surface and the ice [23,24]. A lubricant has mobility, and thus can allow self-healing properties [18,25]. However, the liquid lubricant may be depleted because of evaporation or the de-icing process, which causes ice adhesion values to increase [16,26]. SLIPSs can be obtained by infusing a lubricant into a porous structure. The porous structure of SLIPSs has been prepared in several ways, such as chemical etching [24], porous polymer, self-assembly, and chemical deposition [20]. Anodic oxidation is a common approach to improving the abrasion resistance of an aluminum surface. The pores of the anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) layer are beneficial to absorb and retain the lubricant within the pores. Moreover, anodic oxidation is suitable for a complicated structure, such as aluminum-conductor steel-reinforced cable (ACSR). The lubricant has a significant effect on the performance of the SLIPS [27,28]. For the lubricant, the following criteria are essential [8,29]: (1) the infused lubricant should possess durability under severe conditions; (2) the infused lubricant is immiscible with water; and (3) the infused lubricant can be easily deposited onto a porous structure. The relationships between ice adhesion and lubricant characteristics including viscosity, density, and surface tension were studied [30]. The viscosity of the lubricant affects the efficiency of the infusion and the depletion of the lubricant [31]. The critical self-healing thickness of the SLIPS increases with the increase in silicone oil viscosity [28]. However, the effect of lubricant viscosity on the anti-icing properties and durability still requires further study.
Here, we successfully fabricated SLIPSs with low ice adhesion strength by infusing different viscosities of silicone oil into AAO. The infusion of silicone oils into a porous structure was examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The effects of the viscosity of the silicone oil on the anti-icing properties were studied by measuring the ice adhesion strength. To evaluate durability, we performed cyclic icing/de-icing tests and thermal tests on SLIPS samples. The relationships between the lubricant viscosity and durability of the SLIPSs were obtained. The effects of silicone oil viscosity on the self-healing performance of SLIPSs after icing/de-icing tests were studied as well.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Aluminum alloy plates (6061-T6) were purchased from Dongguan Chaomei Aluminum Products Co., Ltd. (Dongguan, China) and cut into 30 mm × 30 mm × 1 mm pieces. Ethanol (99.7 wt.%), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and oxalic acids (H2C2O4, 99 wt.%) were purchased from Chongqing Huadong Chemical Co. Ltd. (Chongqing, China). Hexadecyltrimethoxysilane (HDTMS) and silicone oil (viscosity 10, 20, 50, 100, 200 mPa·s) were purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai, China).

2.2. Preparation of SLIPSs

Figure 1 illustrates the method of preparing the SLIPS. The Al alloy plate was first washed ultrasonically with deionized water and then by ethanol, and finally dried. Then, the Al plates were immersed in a NaOH solution to remove the oxide layer. After removal of the oxide layer, the plates were ultrasonically cleaned in deionized water. Afterwards, the anodization process was implemented so as to generate nanopores on the surface. The prepared Al surface and 304 stainless steel were taken as anode and cathode, respectively. The anodization was conducted by applying 0.16 A/cm2 in 0.15 M oxalic acids at 20 °C for 10 min. AAO was modified by HDTMS to improve the hydrophobicity and compatibility. Specifically, the anodized samples were immersed in an ethanol solution of 2 wt.% HDTMS for 30 min and then dried at 90 °C for 1 h. Subsequently, to obtain the SLIPS, the surface was immersed in the silicone oil at 80 °C for 24 h under vacuum. A homogeneous oil layer was obtained on the surface.

2.3. Characterization

The micromorphology and elementary composition on the surface were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Zeiss Auriga, Oberkochen, Germany) with attached energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) (Zeiss Auriga, Oberkochen, Germany). The thermogravimetric analysis (TG) for the silicone oil was performed on a TGA/DSC thermal analyzer (STA 449C, Netzsch, Bavaria, Germany) with a heating rate of 2 °C/min from 25 to 300 °C, maintained at 90 °C for 1 h. The contact angle (CA) of the samples was tested using a contact angle meter (DropMeter A-100, Shanghai, China).

2.4. Ice Adhesion Test

The ice adhesion strength of the SLIPS was tested using an ice adhesion test platform. The device consisted of a semiconductor refrigerator, a force transducer (Handpi, HP-200, Shenzhen, China), a motion stage, and a plastic cylinder. The samples were attached to the cooling stage. The cylinder was placed on the samples and filled with water (2 mL). Ice adhesion strength tests were carried out at −20 °C for 3 h. Then, the motion stage was moved at a speed of 1 mm/s until the cylinder shifted on the sample. We recorded the maximum force value of the force transducer. The ice adhesion strength value (τ) is calculated by τ = F/S. F is the measured maximum force. S is the area of the ice sample.

2.5. Durability

2.5.1. Icing/De-Icing Cyclic Test

To evaluate the durability of the as-prepared SLIPS, a repetitive icing/de-icing test was conducted. The test procedures were similar to the ice adhesion test. The cylinder was placed on the testing samples and filled with 2 mL of water. The cooling stage was carried out at −20 °C for 3 h. The ice cylinder was detached from the samples. We recorded the maximum force value of the force transducer. The samples were heated using a heat gun for every icing/de-icing test.

2.5.2. Thermal Durability Test

To confirm the sustainability of the silicone oil within the porous structure surface, the thermal stability of the SLIPS was tested using a dryer at 90 °C for 168 h. The ice adhesion strength of the SLIPS was tested at different time intervals.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphology and Composition

Figure 2 shows the scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of the AAO layers with pore sizes (ϕ = 88 nm) and pore depth (t = 20 μm). The SEM images reveal that the well-ordered and uniform nanopore structures were successfully prepared by anodizing. Figure 3 illustrates the SEM images and EDS spectra of the cross-sections of the AAO layers before and after imbibition of the silicone oil. In the case of the AAO with no oil impregnation, the content of silicon was very low. When the 200 mPa·s silicone oil was impregnated in the AAO pores, the content of silicon increased from 0.6% to 5.0%, as shown in Figure 3c. Meanwhile, the EDS chemical–element mapping images in the inset in Figure 3b indicate that the distribution of silicon was relatively uniform in the cross-section of the nanoporous structure. The EDS spectra results showed that the 200 mPa·s silicone oil fully penetrated into the pores. Moreover, the lower viscosity silicone oils produced a more favorable infusion [31]. These results demonstrate that the silicone oil with various viscosities fully infused into the AAO pores. Figure 4 shows the CA of bare Al and the SLIPS filled with various viscosities of silicone oil. The CA result shows that the SLIPS filled with 50 mPa·s of silicone oil exhibited the largest CA (100.5°), which is larger than that of bare Al (69.1°).

3.2. Slippery Properties

Silicone oil with different viscosities (10, 20, 50, 100, 200 mPa·s) was used for the infusion of AAO surfaces. The sliding angles (SAs) and sliding speed are illustrated in Figure 5. The lowest viscosity silicone oil used (10 mPa·s) produces outstanding slippery properties, with low water sliding angle values (0.8°) and high sliding velocity (25 mm/s). As shown in Figure 4, the sliding angles of water droplets on the SLIPS increase with increasing silicone oil viscosity. The sliding velocities of droplets on the SLIPS fall when the silicone oil viscosity increases. The results demonstrate that the slippery properties of the SLIPS decrease as the viscosity of silicone oil rises, which is in agreement with the previous study [28]. When droplets slide on the SLIPS, the silicone oil layer is deformed. The high-viscosity silicone oil exhibits a more solid-like character, as a result of which deformation becomes difficult and a large viscous drag is exerted on the sliding of the water. This in turn brings about a growth in the SA, consequently reducing the sliding velocity [17,28].

3.3. Ice Adhesion Test

The ice adhesion strength of bare aluminum coated with different viscosities of silicone oil and of different viscosities of silicone oil-infused porous AAO is shown in Figure 6. The bare aluminum surface exhibits the highest ice adhesion strength of 398 kPa. The ice adhesion strength decreases for bare Al coated with different viscosities of silicone oil compared to the bare aluminum surface, which indicates that an outer layer lubricant is necessary to reduce ice adhesion. In addition, ice adhesion strength increases with the increase of the oil viscosity. A similar trend is observed when the silicone oil infused the porous AAO surfaces. However, the silicone oil-infused porous AAO surfaces exhibit dramatically low ice adhesion strength. The bare aluminum coated with 10 mPa·s of silicone oil has an ice adhesion strength of 51.4 kPa, which drops to 2.7 kPa after the 10 mPa·s silicone oil is infused into the porous AAO surfaces. The ice adhesion strength is reduced by 99.3% in contrast with the bare Al alloy. These results indicate that the porous structures play a vital role in the anti-icing property even if the outermost layer on the surface is the same as a silicone oil. The as-prepared surface with excess lubricant infusing into their pores results in the liquid layer on the top [30,31]. This liquid lubricant layer possesses high mobility, as a result of which the ice can easily detach from the surfaces.

3.4. Durability

To evaluate icing durability, cyclic icing/de-icing tests were conducted on SLIPS samples. In this test, the ice was accreted and detached 21 times from the SLIPS. As shown in Figure 7, ice adhesion values for all SLIPSs remain below 10 kPa for 6 de-icing cycles. Note that the ice adhesion strength increases much faster on the 10 mPa·s sample than on the other samples after 12 de-icing tests. Furthermore, we notice that the ice adhesion strength decreases with further tests. When using high-viscosity silicone oil (100, 200 mPa·s), the SLIPS shows dramatic increases in ice adhesion strength after 21 de-icing tests. The SLIPSs with 20 mPa·s and 50 mPa·s viscosities of silicone oil show slower increases with the testing cycles in ice adhesion strength. After 21 cycles of icing/de-icing, ice adhesion values increase in the order of 50 mPa·s (21.6 kPa) < 10 mPa·s (23.9 kPa) < 20 mPa·s (25.1 kPa) < 100 mPa·s (43.3 kPa) < 200 mPa·s (50.7 kPa). This may be explained by the agile ability of the different viscosities of the silicone oil. A higher silicone oil viscosity leads to higher internal friction and movement resistance and makes the silicone oil difficult to be separated [17]. For the low-viscosity silicone oil, ice carried away the lubricant easily because of the high mobility, which caused a rapid increase in ice adhesion strength on the SLIPS with 10 mPa·s silicone oil after 12 de-icing tests. The high viscosities of the silicone oil delay lubricant depletion due to the large viscous drag [31].
The slippery properties of the SLIPS were closely connected with the amount of lubricant [31]. The sliding velocities of water droplets on the SLIPS declined due to the loss of silicone oil after icing/de-icing cycles. After 12 de-icing tests, the sliding velocities of droplets on the SLIPS expressed different viscosities of silicone oil, as shown in Figure 8. The sliding velocities of water droplets on the SLIPS with 10 mPa·s silicone oil decreased from 25 to 1.3 mm/s. With the increase of viscosities, the sliding velocities reduced slowly. We further explored the effect of viscosity on the self-healing property of the SLIPS by investigating its sliding velocity after exposing the samples to the atmosphere for 3 h. The sliding speed of SLIPS with low-viscosity silicone oil (10, 20, 50 mPa·s) increased obviously after exposure. With the increase of viscosities, for the 100 and 200 mPa·s, the sliding velocities increased slowly. These results demonstrate that the viscosity of the silicone oil has a significant effect on the self-healing property. Low-viscosity silicone oil filling in the AAO can enhance the self-healing property of the SLIPS. The lost oil after de-icing can be supplemented by the flow of the top silicone oil layer. Meanwhile, the oil migration from the nanoporous structure to the surface is driven through capillary forces. Low-viscosity silicone oil displays high mobility, and the silicone oil layer can be effectively repaired after de-icing damage, which causes the ice adhesion strength of the SLIPS with 10 mPa·s silicone oil to decrease after 12 de-icing tests, as shown in Figure 7. For the high-viscosity silicone oil (100 and 200 mPa·s), it was hard for the silicone oil layer to be repaired due to the large viscous drag. Therefore, the SLIPSs with high viscosities of silicone oil (100 and 200 mPa·s) show dramatic increases in ice adhesion strength after 21 de-icing tests.
The depletion of lubricant due to evaporation can cause a degradation in slippery performance [32,33]. Herein, we tested the thermal durability of SLIPSs via continuous heating at 90 °C. The ice adhesion test was measured after storing for different times. As shown in Figure 9a, the evaporation of silicone oil leads to gradual increases in ice adhesion strength. Note that the ice adhesion strength increased much faster on the 10 mPa·s sample than on the other samples after 72 h of heating. When the viscosity of silicone oil was 50 mPa·s, the SLIPS exhibited the better durability for anti-icing. With time prolonged to 168 h, ice adhesion strength values increased in the order of 50 mPa·s (20.9 kPa) < 20 mPa·s (26.4 kPa) < 200 mPa·s (30.7 kPa) < 100 mPa·s (32.2 kPa) < 10 mPa·s (33.0 kPa). The results demonstrate that the viscosity of the silicone oil has an obvious effect on the thermal durability. The cause of decreasing ice adhesion with continuous heating was therefore investigated by further thermogravimetric analysis. Figure 9b shows the thermogravimetric (mass loss) curves of silicone oil with different viscosities (10–200 mPa·s). During the heating process at 90 °C for 1 h, some of the silicone oil’s (10 and 20 mPa·s) weight was lost as volatile matter. The weight loss rate of 10 and 20 mPa·s was 0.72% and 0.043%, respectively. There was no obvious change in weight of the high-viscosity silicone oil (50, 100, 200 mPa·s). The results suggest that the lower the oil viscosities, the worse the thermal stability. Moderate viscosity silicone oil is required in SLIPSs, as it can delay lubricant depletion to make the SLIPS practical to use.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we fabricated a SLIPS with extremely low ice adhesion strength using anodization to form a nanopore structure, modifying the nanopore, and subsequently infusing silicone oil into the nanopore. The viscosity of silicone oil affects the ice adhesion strength and durability of the SLIPS. A lower viscosity silicone oil (10 mPa·s) leads to more slippery surfaces and lower ice adhesion strength (2.7 kPa). A SLIPS with low-viscosity silicone oil has worse de-icing resistance because the silicone oil is easily depleted by icing/de-icing cycles. However, after icing/de-icing cycles and followed by exposure to the atmosphere, low-viscosity silicone oil is beneficial to the recovery of the sliding velocities of water droplets on SLIPSs. The results demonstrate that the lower the oil viscosities, the worse the thermal stability. A moderate viscosity silicone oil is beneficial to maintaining low ice adhesion strength of SLIPSs. When the viscosity of silicone oil is 50 mPa·s, the SLIPS exhibits the best durability for anti-icing. Even after 21 de-icing tests or 168 h of heating at 90 °C, the ice adhesion strength still remains below 10% compared with that of bare Al.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.L. and Y.Y.; investigation, G.L., L.W., and X.G.; methodology, G.L. and R.L.; writing—original draft preparation, G.L.; validation, Y.Y. and R.L.; supervision, Y.Y.; writing—review and editing, Y.Y., X.G., and R.L.; funding acquisition, Y.Y. and R.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of P.R. China (project Nos. 51677015 and 51437001).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Jia Jiaqi and Hao Longlong from the Electron Microscope Center of Chongqing University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Huneault, M.; Langheit, C.; St.-Arnaud, R.; Benny, J.; Audet, J.; Richard, J.C. A dynamic programming methodology to develop de-icing strategies during ice storms by channeling load currents in transmission networks. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2005, 20, 1604–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jiang, X.; Fan, C.; Xie, Y. New method of preventing ice disaster in power grid using expanded conductors in heavy icing area. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2019, 12, 536–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, J.; Chuang, F.; Yiping, C.; Hong, R.; Shukai, X.; Tao, Y.; Licheng, L. Research and Application of DC De–Icing Technology in China Southern Power Grid. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2012, 27, 1234–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jiang, X.; Wang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Xie, S.; Wang, Y. Study on AC Flashover Performance and Discharge Process of Polluted and Iced IEC Standard Suspension Insulator String. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2007, 22, 472–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Peter, Z.; Farzaneh, M.; Kiss, L.I. Assessment of the Current Intensity for Preventing Ice Accretion on Overhead Conductors. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2006, 22, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zuo, Z.; Song, X.; Liao, R.; Zhao, X.; Yuan, Y. Understanding the anti-icing property of nanostructured superhydrophobic aluminum surface during glaze ice accretion. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2019, 113, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Golovin, K.; Dhyani, A.; Thouless, M.D.; Tuteja, A. Low-interfacial toughness materials for effective large-scale deicing. Science 2019, 364, 371–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wong, T.S.; Kang, S.; Tang, S.K.Y.; Smythe, E.; Hatton, B.; Grinthal, A.; Aizenberg, J. Bioinspired self-repairing slippery surfaces with pressure-stable omniphobicity. Nature 2011, 477, 443–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, G.; Yuan, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Youdong, J.; Liang, W. Anti-frosting/anti-icing property of nano-ZnO superhydrophobic surface on Al alloy prepared by radio frequency magnetron sputtering. Mater. Res. Express 2020, 7, 02640117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Cao, L.; Jones, A.K.; Sikka, V.K.; Wu, J.; Gao, D. Anti-Icing Superhydrophobic Coatings. Langmuir 2009, 25, 12444–12448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Varanasi, K.K.; Deng, T.; Smith, J.D.; Hsu, M.; Bhate, N. Frost formation and ice adhesion on superhydrophobic surfaces. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kulinich, S.A.; Farhadi, S.; Nose, K.; Du, X.W. Superhydrophobic Surfaces: Are They Really Ice-Repellent? Langmuir 2011, 27, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, J.; Liu, J.; He, M.; Li, K.; Cui, D.; Zhang, Q.; Zeng, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Song, Y. Superhydrophobic surfaces cannot reduce ice adhesion. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101, 41–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Golovin, K.; Kobaku, S.P.R.; Lee, D.H.; Diloreto, E.T.; Mabry, J.M.; Tuteja, A. Designing durable icephobic surfaces. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1501496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Rnneberg, S.; Zhuo, Y.; Laforte, C.; He, J.; Zhang, Z. Interlaboratory Study of Ice Adhesion Using Different Techniques. Coatings 2019, 9, 678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Li, T.; Zhuo, Y.; Hakonsen, V.; Ronneberg, S.; He, J.; Zhang, Z. Epidermal Gland Inspired Self-Repairing Slippery Lubricant-Infused Porous Coatings with Durable Low Ice Adhesion. Coatings 2019, 9, 602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Zhang, J.; Wang, A.; Seeger, S. Nepenthes Pitcher Inspired Anti-Wetting Silicone Nanofilaments Coatings: Preparation, Unique Anti-Wetting and Self-Cleaning Behaviors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 1074–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lee, J.; Shin, S.; Jiang, Y.; Jeong, C.; Stone, H.A.; Choi, C. Oil-Impregnated Nanoporous Oxide Layer for Corrosion Protection with Self-Healing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1606040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, J.; Wang, C.; Song, J.; Huang, L.; Sun, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, C.; Li, Y. Multi-functional application of oil-infused slippery Al surface: From anti-icing to corrosion resistance. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 16099–16109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, P.; Wong, T.S.; Alvarenga, J.; Kreder, M.J.; Adornomartinez, W.E.; Aizenberg, J. Liquid-infused nanostructured surfaces with extreme anti-ice and anti-frost performance. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 6569–6577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rykaczewski, K.; Anand, S.; Subramanyam, S.B.; Varanasi, K.K. Mechanism of frost formation on lubricant-impregnated surfaces. Langmuir 2013, 29, 5230–5238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kreder, M.J.; Alvarenga, J.; Kim, P.; Aizenberg, J. Design of anti-icing surfaces: Smooth, textured or slippery? Nat. Rev. Mater. 2016, 1, 15003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Liu, C.; Li, Y.; Lu, C.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y. Robust Slippery Liquid-Infused Porous Network Surfaces for Enhanced Anti-/De-icing Performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 25471–25477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Barthwal, S.; Lee, B.; Lim, S.H. Fabrication of robust and durable slippery anti-icing coating on textured superhydrophobic aluminum surfaces with infused silicone oil. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 496, 143677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vogel, N.; Belisle, R.A.; Hatton, B.; Wong, T.-S.; Aizenberg, J. Transparency and damage tolerance of patternable omniphobic lubricated surfaces based on inverse colloidal monolayers. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Coady, M.J.; Wood, M.; Wallace, G.Q.; Nielsen, K.E.; Kietzig, A.M.; Lagugné-Labarthet, F.; Ragogna, P.J. Icephobic Behavior of UV-Cured Polymer Networks Incorporated into Slippery Lubricant-Infused Porous Surfaces: Improving SLIPS Durability. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 10, 2890–2896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yeong, Y.H.; Wang, C.; Wynne, K.J.; Gupta, M.C. Oil-infused superhydrophobic silicone material for low ice adhesion with long-term infusion stability. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 32050–32059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Z.; Heng, L.; Jiang, L. Effect of lubricant viscosity on the self-healing properties and electrically driven sliding of droplets on anisotropic slippery surfaces. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 3414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Villegas, M.; Zhang, Y.; Abu Jarad, N.; Soleymani, L.; Didar, T.F. Liquid-Infused Surfaces: A Review of Theory, Design, and Applications. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 8517–8536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Thanh-Binh, N.; Seungchul, P.; Youngdo, J.; Hyuneui, L. Effects of hydrophobicity and lubricant characteristics on anti-icing performance of slippery lubricant-infused porous surfaces. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2018, 69, 99–105. [Google Scholar]
  31. Tonelli, M.; Peppou-Chapman, S.; Ridi, F.; Neto, C. Effect of Pore Size, Lubricant Viscosity, and Distribution on the Slippery Properties of Infused Cement Surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 2987–2995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Baumli, P.; Teisala, H.; Bauer, H.; Garcia-Gonzalez, D.; Damle, V.; Geyer, F.; D’Acunzi, M.; Kaltbeitzel, A.; Butt, H.R.; Vollmer, D. Flow-Induced Long-Term Stable Slippery Surfaces. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1900019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Zhou, W.; Zeng, Y.; Liu, B.; Yu, S.; Hua, W.; Huang, X. Evaporation of polydisperse perfluoropolyether lubricants in heat-assisted magnetic recording. Appl. Phys. Express 2011, 4, 544–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Coatings 10 00896 g001 550
Figure 1. Process diagram for the fabrication of slippery lubricant-infused porous surfaces (SLIPSs).
Figure 1. Process diagram for the fabrication of slippery lubricant-infused porous surfaces (SLIPSs).
Coatings 10 00896 g001
Coatings 10 00896 g002 550
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images: (a) bare aluminum, (b,c) top view, and (d) cross-section of anodic aluminum oxide (AAO).
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images: (a) bare aluminum, (b,c) top view, and (d) cross-section of anodic aluminum oxide (AAO).
Coatings 10 00896 g002
Coatings 10 00896 g003 550
Figure 3. Cross-section of AAO before (a) and after (b) infusion of the silicone oil. The inset shows the EDS mapping images of silicon. (c) EDS spectra of the cross-section of AAO before and after infusion of 200 mPa·s silicone oil.
Figure 3. Cross-section of AAO before (a) and after (b) infusion of the silicone oil. The inset shows the EDS mapping images of silicon. (c) EDS spectra of the cross-section of AAO before and after infusion of 200 mPa·s silicone oil.
Coatings 10 00896 g003
Coatings 10 00896 g004 550
Figure 4. Contact angle of bare Al (a) and the SLIPS filled with 10 mPa·s (b), 20 mPa·s (c), 50 mPa·s (d), 100 mPa·s (e), and 200 mPa·s (f) of silicone oil.
Figure 4. Contact angle of bare Al (a) and the SLIPS filled with 10 mPa·s (b), 20 mPa·s (c), 50 mPa·s (d), 100 mPa·s (e), and 200 mPa·s (f) of silicone oil.
Coatings 10 00896 g004
Coatings 10 00896 g005 550
Figure 5. The sliding angles and sliding velocities of the SLIPSs filled with various viscosities of silicone oil.
Figure 5. The sliding angles and sliding velocities of the SLIPSs filled with various viscosities of silicone oil.
Coatings 10 00896 g005
Coatings 10 00896 g006 550
Figure 6. Ice adhesion strength of the various viscosities (10–200 mPa·s) of silicone oil infused with bare Al and nanoporous AAO.
Figure 6. Ice adhesion strength of the various viscosities (10–200 mPa·s) of silicone oil infused with bare Al and nanoporous AAO.
Coatings 10 00896 g006
Coatings 10 00896 g007 550
Figure 7. Variation in the ice adhesion strength of the SLIPS filled with different viscosities (10–200 mPa·s) of silicone oil after icing/de-icing cycles.
Figure 7. Variation in the ice adhesion strength of the SLIPS filled with different viscosities (10–200 mPa·s) of silicone oil after icing/de-icing cycles.
Coatings 10 00896 g007
Coatings 10 00896 g008 550
Figure 8. Sliding viscosities of the water droplets (30 μL) on the SLIPS with an inclination angle of ~10° before and after 12 de-icing cycles, then held at room temperature for 3 h.
Figure 8. Sliding viscosities of the water droplets (30 μL) on the SLIPS with an inclination angle of ~10° before and after 12 de-icing cycles, then held at room temperature for 3 h.
Coatings 10 00896 g008
Coatings 10 00896 g009 550
Figure 9. (a) Variation in the ice adhesion strength of the SLIPS filled with different viscosities (10–200 mPa·s) of silicone oil after the heat-resistant test at 90 °C. (b) Thermogravimetric curve of silicone oil with different viscosities (10–200 mPa·s). The inset shows the enlarged part marked by the red box.
Figure 9. (a) Variation in the ice adhesion strength of the SLIPS filled with different viscosities (10–200 mPa·s) of silicone oil after the heat-resistant test at 90 °C. (b) Thermogravimetric curve of silicone oil with different viscosities (10–200 mPa·s). The inset shows the enlarged part marked by the red box.
Coatings 10 00896 g009

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, G.; Yuan, Y.; Liao, R.; Wang, L.; Gao, X. Fabrication of a Porous Slippery Icephobic Surface and Effect of Lubricant Viscosity on Anti-Icing Properties and Durability. Coatings 2020, 10, 896. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10090896

AMA Style

Liu G, Yuan Y, Liao R, Wang L, Gao X. Fabrication of a Porous Slippery Icephobic Surface and Effect of Lubricant Viscosity on Anti-Icing Properties and Durability. Coatings. 2020; 10(9):896. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10090896

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Guoyong, Yuan Yuan, Ruijin Liao, Liang Wang, and Xue Gao. 2020. "Fabrication of a Porous Slippery Icephobic Surface and Effect of Lubricant Viscosity on Anti-Icing Properties and Durability" Coatings 10, no. 9: 896. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10090896

APA Style

Liu, G., Yuan, Y., Liao, R., Wang, L., & Gao, X. (2020). Fabrication of a Porous Slippery Icephobic Surface and Effect of Lubricant Viscosity on Anti-Icing Properties and Durability. Coatings, 10(9), 896. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10090896

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop