Next Article in Journal
Homogeneous–Heterogeneous Chemical Reactions of Radiation Hybrid Nanofluid Flow on a Cylinder with Joule Heating: Nanoparticles Shape Impact
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Copper Nanoparticles and Ions on Epididymis and Spermatozoa Viability of Chinese Soft-Shelled Turtles Pelodiscus sinensis
Previous Article in Journal
Guided Insertion of Temporary Anchorage Device in Form of Orthodontic Titanium Miniscrews with Customized 3D Templates—A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synergic Effect of Microorganism and Colloidal Biochar-Based Organic Fertilizer on the Growth and Fruit Quality of Tomato
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

β-Cyclodextrin-Modified Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles with Photo-Responsive Gatekeepers for Controlled Release of Hexaconazole

Coatings 2021, 11(12), 1489; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11121489
by Hua Pan †, Wenjing Li †, Litao Wu, Weilan Huang and Fang Zhang *
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Coatings 2021, 11(12), 1489; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11121489
Submission received: 14 October 2021 / Revised: 22 November 2021 / Accepted: 22 November 2021 / Published: 2 December 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript coatings-1441519 " β-Cyclodextrin-modified Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles with Photo-responsive Gatekeepers for Controlled Release of Hexaconazole" by Zhang and co-workers describes photo-responsive controlled-release hexaconazole nanoparticles were successfully prepared with azobenzene-modified bimodal mesoporous silica, in which b-cyclodextrin was capped onto the nanoparticles surface via host–guest interaction.

The manuscript is logical and well written. The paper will definitely be of interest to the readers of Coatings.

Comments / suggestions:

1) How was the host–guest interaction between β-Cyclodextrin and BMMs-Azo confirmed?

2) Will the resulting system "turn off" in the absence of light after turning on? If so, how fast?

3) The quality of Figure 6 needs to be improved.

4) Line 113 Hexaconazole or hexazolol?

Line 102. THN?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This work is interesting and the analysis is reasonably clear, but there are still a few concerns regarding this article. Therefore, I suggest its publication after the following major revisions:

- A clear scheme for obtaining the Hex@BMMs/Azo/β-CD Nps is absolutely necessary!

- In my opinion, the IR spectra do not clearly sustain the presence of various functional groups on the surface of BMMs. Additional analyses: XPS, elemental analysis / EDX, and thermal analysis are necessary to demonstrate these structural changes.

-In subchapter 3.4. Photo-responsive property, the authors stated, “After being irradiated with 365-nm UV light for 120 min, approximately 81.5% of Azo in the Nps was isomerized from trans to cis structure”. How do the authors estimated the percent of Azo in the Nps isomerized from trans to cis structure?

-DLS analysis: the authors should specify which solvent they used to disperse the obtained Nps.

Some minor corrections:

  • Line 41: “stimulative” instead of “simulative”
  • Line 102: “THF” instead of “THN”
  • Line 136: PDI means polydispersity index, not polymer dispersity index

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Article entitled "β-Cyclodextrin-Modified Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles 2
with Photo-responsive Gatekeepers for Controlled Release of 3
Hexaconazole" addresses a very interesting and needed approach. It has a real potential to be published and reached by a numerous audience. There is a lot of effort and experimental work behind this report and that is to be appreciated. However, in general terms the results could be better described, presented and mainly discussed. The authors are suggested to improve the introduction section. Some more literature are needed to explain/describe the introduction. Some minor mistakes in grammar and English language are detected. So, the authors are requested to improve all the minor mistakes before its publication in "Coatings", a greatly reputed journal. 

Best Luck 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

After revision, the manuscript has been greatly improved. I recommend its publication in revised form.

Author Response

Thanks for your consideration!

Back to TopTop