Next Article in Journal
Effects of Different Post-Treatments on Arc Erosion Resistance of Cold-Sprayed AgC Composite Electric Contact
Previous Article in Journal
The Physical Properties of Submicron and Nano-Grained La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 and Nd0.7Sr0.3MnO3 Synthesised by Sol–Gel and Solid-State Reaction Methods
Previous Article in Special Issue
Low-Damage and Self-Limiting (Al)GaN Etching Process through Atomic Layer Etching Using O2 and BCl3 Plasma
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Plasma-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition of Zirconium Oxide Thin Films and Its Application to Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

1
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Korea
2
Research Facility Center, Kunsan National University, Jeollabuk-Do 54150, Korea
3
R&D Center Hansol Chemical Co., Ltd., Jeollabuk-Do 55321, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Coatings 2021, 11(3), 362; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11030362
Submission received: 1 January 2021 / Revised: 5 March 2021 / Accepted: 17 March 2021 / Published: 22 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Atomic Layer Deposition of Thin-Films)

Abstract

:
Zirconium oxides were deposited using plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition (PEALD) involving (2-(N-methylamino)1-MethylEthyleneCyclopentadienyl)Bis(DiMethylAmino)Zr (abbreviated as CMEN-Zr) and oxygen plasma as zirconium and oxygen sources. The zirconium oxide thin films demonstrate temperature-independent growth rates per cycle of 0.94 A/cycle at 150–215 °C. The deposited ZrO2 thin films were characterized using numerous analytical tools, i.e., X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy for chemical bonding state and composition, X-ray diffraction for crystallinity, atomic force microscopy for surface morphology, field-emission scanning electron microscopy for cross-sectional analysis, spectroscopic ellipsometry and UV–visible spectrophotometry for optical characterization, capacitance–voltage measurements for dielectric constants and atomic defects, and current–voltage characteristics for electrical information. The insulating features of the crystalline and stoichiometric ZrO2 films were implemented in the anode composites to evaluate the influence of ALD-based nano-features on the electrochemical performance of solid oxide fuel cells, with the main emphasis on anode performance. The presence of nanomaterials on Ni/YSZ anode composites is analyzed to determine the negative effects on electrochemical performance and the degradation of cell performance of solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs). The artificial design was proven to be effective in controlling the cell performance as long as proper material design was adopted in SOFC electrodes.

1. Introduction

The advent of the hydrogen economy in association with the fourth industrial revolution has ignited extensive research into solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) due to their academic and industrial applications. SOFCs have become one of the powerful next generation energy resources due to their unique advantages such as high operation efficiency, contamination-free fuel flexibility, and minimized pollution [1,2,3,4]. SOFCs are typically constructed using a multitude of dissimilar materials with a variety of physical and chemical properties, including cathodes, electrolytes, and anodes, in addition to subsidiary sealing and interconnect materials. To maintain the highly efficient operation of SOFCs at intermediate temperatures ranging from 650 and 800 °C, electrodes should be improved dramatically by minimizing polarization loss and improving ionic conductivity. There have been a few attempts involving artificial controls on triple phase boundary reactions based on the charge transfer between electronic/ionic carries and fuels, depending largely on the microstructure of electrodes and interfacial geometries adjacent to the ionic electrolyte [5,6,7].
Atomic layer deposition (ALD) has been established as a unique thin film deposition technique originating from chemisorption between the reactants and underlying substrates. Starting with the pioneering report by Suntola [8], self-limiting atomic layer deposition has been extended through low-temperature deposition, atomic scale thickness control, excellent step coverage characteristics of conformal coating, and conformal deposition of the materials under interest, all without limiting the electronic applications, including dynamic random access memory (DRAM), non-volatile random access memory, and metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs) [9,10,11,12]. Recently, ALD has been applied to non-electronic applications such as sensors, solar cells, water-splitting catalysts and materials, secondary batteries, and fuel cells due to its ability to deposit mainly metal and oxide materials to three-dimensional complex material structures [13,14,15,16,17]. In particular, ALD has been adapted to three-dimensional interconnected microstructures by adding the ALD-based penetration capability, unlike the conventional ceramic processing techniques. The conformal features of atomic layer deposition can be employed to control oxide-based cathodes and anodes of solid oxide fuel cells in terms of performance improvement or performance degradation. In order to verify the applicability of atomic layer deposition in the electrochemical performance in SOFCs, the current work chose metal oxide materials with a special emphases on the degradation in SOFC cell performance. The roles of atomic layer deposition in SOFCs are discussed along with the processing designs with the aim of achieving optimized SOFC performance and stability.
To demonstrate the application of ALD-assisted surface modification concept, 2-(N-methylamino)1-MethylEthyleneCyclopentadienyl)Bis(Dimethylamino)Zr (abbreviated as CMEN-Zr) was combined with oxygen plasma to deposit ZrO2 materials onto the Ni/YSZ anode composites of SOFCs. The current work focuses on the atomic layer deposition of ZrO2 thin films involving a newly developed Zr precursor and its application to anode composites of SOFC materials, with the aim of controlling artificial cell performance by modifying the reactive sites present in porous electrodes. In addition, the potential of the atomic layer deposition of materials into solid oxide fuel cells is discussed in terms of the reliability and stability issues encountered in SOFCs.

2. Experimental

Zirconium oxide thin films were deposited using plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition (PEALD) that employed CMEN-Zr (Hansol Chemical Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea) as a zirconium precursor with oxygen plasma as an oxygen source. A PEALD system’s flow of reactants and products, controlled in shower head mode, was utilized. One basic PEALD cycle was performed based on the following sequence: (CEMN-Zr supply)–(Ar purge)–(O2 plasma supply)–(Ar purge). The CMEN-Zr precursor was held at 70 °C to guarantee sufficient reactant molecules in the ALD reaction chamber, and the connecting lines were maintained at 110 °C. The oxygen source was supplied using oxygen plasma at a power of 100 W and frequency of 13.56 MHz. The substrate temperature varied between 90 °C and 215 °C for zirconium oxide thin films, and the total chamber pressure was controlled to 0.53 Torr. The Zr precursor was preheated to 70 °C and the line was maintained at 110 °C. The Si wafers were cleaned in the order of acetone (CH3COCH3 99.5%, OCI Company, Seoul, Korea), methanol (CH3OH 99.9%, OCI Company, Seoul, Korea), and deionized water. Subsequently, the native oxide was removed using dilute hydrofluoric acid (HF: 48–51%, J.T. Baker, NJ, USA).
The chemical states of elements, compositions, and trace element amounts in the films were analyzed after the 34 s Ar bombardment sputtering using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, K-alpha model, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were performed using a high-sensitivity diffractometer (D-2000, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). Surface morphologies were obtained using an atomic force microscope (AFM, XE150, PSIA, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, Korea). Ultraviolet–visible spectrometers (UV-2450, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) were employed to measure the transmission. Capacitance–voltage measurements (HP 4192A low-frequency impedance analyzer, Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and dc-based current–voltage characteristics (4155C semiconductor parameter analyzer, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) were made to obtain the electrical/dielectric parameters of insulating zirconium oxide thin films, respectively. The microstructure of the films was analyzed using high-resolution field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, S-4800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The optical thicknesses were measured using high-precision spectroscopic ellipsometers (UVISEL AGAX ER, Horiba, Kyoto, Japan and MG-1000-UV, Nano-view, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, Korea).
This work employed commercial SOFC cells (Kceracell Co., Ltd., Boksu-myeon, Korea) in order to understand the role of ALD-based ZrO2 in the electrochemical performance. As shown in the schematic diagram of Figure 1, composite materials consisting of nickel oxide (NiO) and 3 mol% yttria-stabilized zirconia (3YSZ) were used as anode layer materials with a thickness of 800–850 μm. Subsequently, the anode functional layer made up of NiO and (Yb2O3)0.06(Sc2O3)0.04(ZrO2)0.9(6Yb4ScSZ, 10–15 μm) and the electrolyte layer (6Yb4ScSZ, 10–15 μm) were coated using the screen-printing method and then laminated and co-sintered. On the electrolyte layer, a buffer layer (2–5 μm) was coated that consisted of Gd-Yb-Bi-Ce-O(GYBC), and heat treatment was performed. Afterward, a lanthanum strontium cobalt ferrite (LSCF)-Gd doped ceria (GDC) layer (5–10 μm) and LSCF layer (20–25 μm) were coated as a cathode functional layer and cathode layer, respectively. After heat-treatment, a low-temperature sintered cathode current collection (LTCCC) layer was coated (the detailed information on LTCCC is not available to the customers). The unit cell performance was quantified using a button cell with a size of 2 cm × 2 cm. The fabricated SOFC cells were placed between platinum mesh and nickel foam materials as charge-collecting metals for cathode and anode composites. The whole cell assembly was heated to 800 °C, and a pressure of 15 kgf was applied to the SOFC assembly to guarantee perfect sealing between the SOFC cathode and anode compartments. At 800 °C, the mixture of N2 and H2 was controlled to the total flowrate of 200 sccm, and in order to reduce the NiO/YSZ anode composites to Ni/YSZ composites, which were initially 200 sccm N2, by progressively increasing the flowrate of H2 and decreasing the flowrate of N2 under the total flow rate of 200 sccm, and finally, they were 0 sccm N2 and 200 sccm H2. After complete reduction, the air and hydrogen were supplied to both cathode and anode. On the reduced Ni/YSZ anode (the thickness of which was approximately 850 μm), ZrO2 was deposited by PEALD with twice the pulse time and Ar purge time (CMEN-Zr (from 2.5 s to 5 s), O2 plasma (from 9 s to 18 s), and Ar purge (from 60 s to 120 s)) because the reactants (i.e., zirconium and oxygen sources) needed to penetrate the porous reduced Ni/YSZ anode and the byproducts needed to be removed from the pore network. The deposition temperature was 150 °C, which is within the ALD window, and the deposition cycle was 200 cycles. Open cell voltages, current–voltage and impedance spectroscopy characteristics were measured to determine the electric characteristics in the temperature range of 650–800 °C using 4-point measurements (biologic electrochemical system).

3. Results and Discussion

Initially, Zr-based halogen compounds were studied, such as ZrI4 and ZrCl4 [18,19]. However, strong corrosive byproducts such as HCl and HI unintentionally damaged the ZrO2 thin films deposited. To solve the issue, alkoxide and alkylamode-based Zr precursors were developed, i.e., ZTB (Zirconium Tert-Butoxide; Zr[OC(CH3)3]4), TDMA-Zr (Tetrakis(DiMethylAmido)Zirconium (Zr([CH3]2N)4), and TEMA-Zr (Tetrakis(EthylMethylAmido)Zirconium; Zr[N(CH3)2(C2H5)2]) [20,21,22]. The former alkoxide-based ZrO2 should be accompanied through the breakage of strong Zr-O, leading to a slower growth rate. Instead, alkylamide-based ZrO2 involved the weaker bond mediated between Zr and N, leading to a faster growth rate. However, alkyl-amide-based ZrO2 suffered from thermal instability. After improvement in thermal stability at relatively high temperatures, the cyclopentadienyl ring was attached to its preceding alkylamide-based precursor, producing alkylamido-cyclopentadiene compounds such as ZAC((Cyclopentadienyl)tris(dimethylAmino)Zirconium and CpZr[N(CH3)2]3) [23]. Continuously, CPNZr and CMEN-Zr were synthesized with the aim of increasing the corresponding thermal stability and crystallinity [24].
The current work employed a Zr-containing organometallic compound [2-(N-methylamino)1-MethylEthyleneCyclopentadienyl]Bis(DiMethylAmino)Zr, which is an Alkylamido-cyclopentadiene compound, abbreviated as CMEN-Zr ([η5:η1-CpCH(CH3)CH2NMe]Zr(NMe2)2), where C is the Cp (cyclopentadienyl ring), M is the methyl group (-CH3), E is the ethylene bridge (-C2H2-), and N is the N-methylamino group (-NHCH3). The detailed molecular structure is demonstrated in Figure 2.
The pulse-time dependences for the CMEN-Zr precursor and oxygen plasma were performed at 150 °C, as shown in Figure 3a,b. The saturation conditions were 2.5 s and 9 s for CMEN-Zr precursor and oxygen plasma, respectively. The cycle dependence was investigated at 150 °C, taking into account the saturation states of CMEN-Zr and oxygen plasma sources, as shown in Figure 3c. The linear dependence of the deposited thickness on ALD cycle numbers allows empirical determination of the growth per cycle, 0.94 A/Cycle. Finally, the pre-determined conditions of CMEN-Zr and oxygen plasma sources were monitored as a function of temperature, as shown in Figure 3d. The ALD windows were found to exist from 140 °C to 215 °C. Furthermore, there was a possibility of higher temperatures as an upper bound for the surface limiting ALD windows.
The chemical states and compositions of the CMEN-Zr-based ZrO2 were investigated using XPS analysis, which Figure 4a shows in the survey spectrum along with the core spectra of Zr 3d and O 1s displayed in Figure 4b,c. As shown in Figure 4b,c, the Zr 3d and O 1s peaks were found to be 182.8 and 530.7 eV, respectively, and their positions are in reasonable agreement with the reported literature [25,26,27]. From the XPS quantification of the Zr 3d and O 1s peaks, the Zr and O compositions were determined to be 36.02 and 59.61 atom percentiles, leading to an approximate stoichiometric ratio of one to two for the Zr versus O elements. No zirconium oxide thin films included significant amounts of carbon or nitrogen contamination, i.e., the contents were below the detection limit of XPS.
X-ray diffraction was performed to evaluate the crystallinity of ZrO2-based thin films. As shown in Figure 5, the empirical X-ray diffraction information was compared in terms of the reported crystal structures, e.g., monoclinic and tetragonal structures whose JCDPS peaks were found in JCPDS No. 98-065-8755 and 98-065-5671, respectively. The tetragonal peaks were indexed as (011), (110), (112), and (121), while the (11-1) peak of the monoclinic structure was located at 2θ = 28.182°. The current CMEN-Zr-based ZrO2 thin films were present according to the characteristic of the structural composites composed of two different crystalline structures. The mixture of monoclinic and tetragonal ZrO2 materials have mainly been reported at the semiconductor/dielectric interfaces, although a monoclinic structure was detected in the structural analyses [19,28,29].
The cross-sectional electron micrographs are shown in Figure 6a along with the crystalline features, indicating the non-flat features of the top thin film surface. From the AFM analysis results of Figure 7, the mixed crystalline phases seemed to produce a larger RMS compared to the Si bare specimen, where the ZrO2 thin films and bare Si exhibited 0.27 nm and 0.113 nm, respectively. Taking into account the deposited thickness (of approximately 32.3 nm), the normalized RMS was less than 1%, which was superior to the preceding ZrO2 results and could be considered as smooth in a relative manner, despite the X-ray diffraction analysis characteristic of the existence of crystalline phases. The surface roughnesses have been reported to range from 3.5% to 5.7% after the normalization based on the thickness of the ZrO2 thin films under test, except for less than 1% in the ZrO2 deposited using Zr amide precursors [21,23,24,30,31,32]. The current ZrO2 thin films demonstrated a highly smooth surface morphology characteristic of the superior RMS value (which is equivalent to less than 1% in terms of ratios normalized based on thickness).
The optical UV–visible transmission was monitored to confirm the transparent features of the ALD-based ZrO2 thin films between 300 and 800 nm and included the ultraviolet and visible light regimes. The optical transmittance increased monotonically with increasing photonic wavelength. The lowest transmittance of 76.6% was measured at a wavelength of 300 nm, and the highest transmittance of 95.5% was measured at 800 nm (see Figure 8). As shown in Figure 9, the as-deposited ZrO2 thin films exhibited an order of 10−6 A/cm2. However, the annealed ZrO2 thin films showed an improved leakage current density of approximately 10−7 A/cm2.
The improved electrical performance is attributed to the improvement in crystallinity, which is dependent on the thermal annealing and interfacial traps. The breakdown voltage was measured to approximately 4 MV/cm. The dielectric information was extracted from capacitance–voltage measurements on the as-deposited films and annealed at 500 °C and 600 °C, as shown in Figure 10. The dielectric constant of ZrO2 thin films was calculated to be from 22.9 and 25.2. These empirical dielectric constants are in agreement with prior reports, even though they exhibited a higher constant than has been previously reported.
Furthermore, the flat band voltage hysteresis decreased from 5.6 V for the as-deposited ZrO2 and 1.9 and 2.0 V for the annealed ZrO2 thin films at 500 and 600 °C, respectively. Based on the capacitance–voltage measurement and current–voltage characteristics, the electrical and dielectric information can be extracted. Table 1 compares the electric and dielectric characteristics obtained from ALD-based ZrO2 thin films. The current ZrO2 thin films demonstrate that the CMENZr-based ZrO2 thin films are classified as high-k dielectric materials featuring low leakage current density and high breakdown electric fields despite relatively large flat band voltage hysteresis compared to those of the ZrO2 thin films reported previously [18,19,21,30,31,32].
The ZrO2 thin films were applied to the anode composites of SOFCs composed of Ni and YSZ composite. In order to probe the presence of ZrO2 materials in the reduced Ni/YSZ composites, an XPS analysis was performed. The presence of the Zr element in the relatively higher concentration near the Ni/YSZ composite surface enabled one to differentiate the deposited ZrO2 thin films deposited using CMEN-Zr and oxygen plasma. It is speculated that the ALD-based ZrO2 can be deposited into the pore networks formed in the Ni/YSZ anode composites. To probe the effect of ALD-based ZrO2 on the anode performance, three cases were tested, including ALD-based ZrO2 thin films with 50 cycles and 200 cycles along with the reference anode without any presence of ZrO2 thin films. Additionally, respective samples were tested to measure the cell performance, and then ZrO2 thin films were applied to the reduced Ni/YSZ anodes, as described above.
The measured cell performances are shown in Figure 11 as a function of operating temperature and ZrO2 cycles. The presence of 50-cycled ZrO2 (4.7 nm) did not influence the SOFC performance. However, the 200-cycled ZrO2 materials significantly deteriorated the cell performance in terms of open circuit voltages and maximum power. The extracted information is shown in Figure 12. At 800 °C, the maximum power decreased from 1284 to 1075 mW for the 200 cycled ZrO2 films compared to the first cell test, which involved no coating of ZrO2 nanomaterials, and so the maximum decreased from 1219 to 1133 mW for 50-cycled ZrO2. In contrast, the standard reference cell showed powers of 1017 and 1039 mW for successive cell characterizations. In other words, the presence of ZrO2 nanomaterials onto the cathode system degraded the cell performance of SOFC unit cells. The corresponding open cell voltages were also reduced by an approximately similar magnitude before and after coating of ZrO2, as shown in Figure 12 between 1.10 V and 1.02 V. The presence of ZrO2 materials does not affect the open cell voltage (OCV) due to the relative independence of OCV from the electrode responses. The presence of ZrO2 materials can be depicted schematically, as in Figure 13. The presence of ZrO2 nanomaterials can be deposited at triple phase boundaries on electronic conductors (i.e., metallic nickel), ionic conductor YSZ, and gaseous phase involving H2 and H2O. The following electrochemical reaction usually takes place:
2H2 + 2O2− → 2H2O + 4e
The presence of ZrO2 nanomaterials decreases the effective density of triple phase boundaries by reducing the resultant electrochemical performance.
Impedance spectroscopy analysis was performed in terms of equivalent circuits, incorporating the ohmic resistances and electrode-related responses composed of high-frequency, medium-frequency, and low-frequency regimes. The electrochemical impedance is modeled using equivalent notation, which is described by R0 (RhighCPEhigh) (RmedCPEmed) (RlowCPElow), where R0 is the ohmic resistance, and Rhigh, Rmed, Rlow and CPEhigh, CPEmed, and CPElow are the resistances and constant phase elements, at high, medium, and low-frequency regimes, respectively. The ohmic resistances coexist with three parallel RC components, denoted by (RiCPEi) using parenthesis. In particular, this presence does not seem to influence the overall ohmic resistances and instead affects the electrode-related responses, especially high-frequency responses, compared to the remaining frequency responses. SOFCs have attracted academic and industrial interests as one of the powerful next generation energy resources due to their unique advantages such as high operation efficiency, contamination-free fuel flexibility, and minimized pollution. SOFCs are typically constructed using materials with dissimilar physical and chemical properties, including cathodes, electrolytes, and anodes, in addition to the subsidiary sealing and interconnect materials.
To achieve highly efficient operation of SOFCs at intermediate temperatures ranging from 650 and 800 °C, the electrodes, i.e., cathodes and anodes, should be improved dramatically by minimizing polarization loss of composite electrodes in addition to improving ionic conductivity in electrolytes. There has been a highly limited number of empirical attempts involving artificial controls on triple boundary reactions based on the charge transfer between electronic/ionic carries and fuels. This approach depends largely on the microstructure of electrodes and interfacial geometries adjacent to the ionic electrolyte in combination with triple phase boundaries and their contributions to electrochemical reactions at both the anodes and cathodes. Although the current work was applied to Ni/YSZ anode composites of SOFCs, the conformal feature of atomic layer deposition can be employed to control oxide-based cathodes and anodes as well in terms of performance improvement or performance degradation, depending on the beneficial and detrimental influences. The current study reports the success of atomic layer deposition combined with solid oxide fuel cells, with special emphasis on the triple phase boundaries. The current work chose metal oxide materials for controlling the SOFC anodes.

4. Conclusions

ZrO2 thin films were successfully deposited through plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition using (2-(N-methylamino)1-MethylEthyleneCyclopentadienyl)Bis(Dimethylamino)Zr (abbreviated as CMEN-Zr) as Zr sources and oxygen plasma as oxygen sources. The conformal deposition of insulating and the quasi-crystalline zirconium oxide nanomaterials were applied to the Ni/YSZ anode composites of solid oxide fuel cells. The atomic layer deposition of functional oxide materials can be in the structurally controlled manner deposited to the anode composites in the solid oxide fuel cells. The ALD-based ZrO2 functions as an inhibitor for the electrode reactions at the triple phase boundaries (TPBs) of SOFCs, thus decreasing the maximum power. The understanding of the ALD-assisted ZrO2 coating in association with the degraded electrochemical performance can be employed in searching for the synergistic materials (or catalytic materials). However, this approach should be tested for long-time stability issues in future studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and formal analysis, J.O. and G.S.; investigation, J.K.; methodology, S.B.; supervision J.-W.P.; writing—original draft preparation and supervision, J.-H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Programs through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by Ministry of Education (NRF-2016R1D1A1B01015557). This research was also supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT for convergent research in Development program for convergence R&D over traditional culture and current technology (NRF-2016M3C1B5906486), by Nano Material Technology Development Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2021M3A7B4021104), and by the Multi-Ministry Collaborative R&D Program (Development of Techniques for Identification and Analysis of Gas Molecules to Protect Against Toxic Substances) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by KNPA, MSIT, MOTIE, ME, and NFA (NRF-2020M3D9A1080706).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data of this work are available upon request to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ormerod, R.M. Solid oxide fuel cells. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2003, 32, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Minh, N.Q. Solid oxide fuel cell technology-features and applications. Solid State Ion. 2004, 174, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jacobson, A.J. Materials for solid oxide fuel cells. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 660–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yamamoto, O. Solid oxide fuel cells: Fundamental aspects prospects. Electrochim. Acta 2000, 45, 2423–2435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhu, W.; Ding, D.; Xia, C. Enhancement in three-phase boundary of SOFC electrodes by and ion impregnation method: A modeling comparison. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2008, 11, B83–B86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, C.; Lee, E.K.; Kim, Y.T.; Lee, D. Enhancing triple-phase boundary at fuel electrode of direct carbon fuel cell using a fuel-filled ceria-coated porous anode. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2014, 39, 17314–17321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dusastre, V.; Kilner, J.A. Optimisation of composite cathodes for intermediate temperature SOFC applications. Solid State Ion. 1999, 126, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Suntola, T. Atomic layer epitaxy. Mater. Sci. Rep. 1989, 4, 261–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zaera, F. The surface chemistry of thin film atomic layer deposition (ALD) processes for electronic device manufacturing. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 3521–3526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Berthelot, A.; Caillat, C.; Huard, V.; Barnola, S.; Boeck, B.; Del-Puppo, H.; Emonet, N.; Lalanne, F. Highly reliable TiN/ZrO2/TiN 3D stacked capacitors for 45 nm embedded DRAM technologies. In Proceedings of the ESSDERC 2006—Proceedings of the 36th European Solid-State Device Research Conference, Montreux, Switzerland, 19–21 September 2006; pp. 343–346. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, Z.; Zhu, W.G.; Du, A.Y.; Wu, L.; Fang, Z.; Tran, X.A.; Liu, W.J.; Zhang, K.L.; Yu, H.Y. Highly uniform, self-compliance, and forming-free ALD HfO2-based RRAM with Ge doping. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2012, 59, 1203–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xuan, Y.; Wu, Y.Q.; Shen, T.; Yang, T.; Ye, P.D. High performance submicron inversion-type enhancement-mode InGaAs MOSFETs with ALD Al2O3, HfO2 and HfAlO as gate dielectrics. In Proceedings of the Technical Digest—International Electron Devices Meeting, IEDM, Washington, DC, USA, 10–12 December 2007; pp. 637–640. [Google Scholar]
  13. Boyadjiev, S.; Georgieva, V.; Vergov, L.; Baji, Z.; Gáber, F.; Szilágyi, I.M. Gas sensing properties of very thin TiO2 films prepared by atomic layer deposition (ALD). Proc. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2014, 559, 012013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Seo, S.; Jeong, S.; Park, H.; Shin, H.; Park, N.G. Atomic layer deposition for efficient and stable perovskite solar cells. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 2403–2416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pickrahn, K.L.; Gorlin, Y.; Seitz, L.C.; Garg, A.; Nordlund, D.; Jaramillo, T.F.; Bent, S.F. Applications of ALD MnO to electrochemical water splitting. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 14003–14011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pavlenko, M.; Siuzdak, K.; Coy, E.; Załęski, K.; Jancelewicz, M.; Iatsunskyi, I. Enhanced solar-driven water splitting of 1D core-shell Si/TiO2/ZnO nanopillars. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 26426–26433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Neudeck, S.; Mazilkin, A.; Reitz, C.; Hartmann, P.; Janek, J.; Brezesinski, T. Effect of low-temperature Al2O3 ALD coating on Ni-rich layered oxide composite cathode on the long-term cycling performance of lithium-ion batteries. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Cassir, M.; Goubin, F.; Bernay, C.; Vernoux, P.; Lincot, D. Synthesis of ZrO2 thin films by atomic layer deposition: Growth kinetics, structural and electrical properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2002, 193, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kukli, K.; Forsgren, K.; Ritala, M.; Leskelä, M.; Aarik, J.; Hårsta, A. Dielectric properties of zirconium oxide grown by atomic layer deposition from iodide precursor. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2001, 148, F227–F232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lao, S.X.; Martin, R.M.; Chang, J.P. Plasma enhanced atomic layer deposition of HfO2 and ZrO2 high-k thin films. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vac. Surf. Film. 2005, 23, 488–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hausmann, D.M.; Kim, E.; Becker, J.; Gordon, R.G. Atomic layer deposition of hafnium and zirconium oxides using metal amide precursors. Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 4350–4358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yun, S.J.; Lim, J.W.; Lee, J.H. PEALD of zirconium oxide using tetrakis(ethylmethylamino) zirconium and oxygen. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2004, 7, F81–F84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Blanquart, T.; Niinistö, J.; Aslam, N.; Banerjee, M.; Tomczak, Y.; Gavagnin, M.; Longo, V.; Puukilainen, E.; Wanzenboeck, H.D.; Kessels, W.M.M.; et al. Zr(NEtMe)2(guan-NEtMe2)2] as a novel atomic layer deposition precursor: ZrO2 film growth and mechanistic studies. Chem. Mater. 2013, 25, 3088–3095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jung, J.S.; Lee, S.K.; Hong, C.S.; Shin, J.H.; Kim, J.M.; Kang, J.G. Atomic layer deposition of ZrO2 thin film on Si(100) using {η5:η1-Cp(CH2)3NMe}Zr(NMe2)2/O3 as precursors. Thin Solid Film. 2015, 589, 831–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kanomata, K.; Tokoro, K.; Imai, T.; Pansila, P.; Miura, M.; Ahmmad, B.; Kubota, S.; Hirahara, K.; Hirose, F. Room-temperature atomic layer deposition of ZrO2 using tetrakis(ethylmethylamino) zirconium and plasma-excited humidified argon. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 387, 497–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Roy, P.C.; Jeong, H.S.; Doh, W.H.; Kim, C.M. Atomic layer deposition (ALD) of ZrO2 in ultrahigh vacuum (UHV). Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2013, 34, 1221–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Weinreich, W.; Tauchnitz, T.; Polakowski, P.; Drescher, M.; Riedel, S.; Sundqvist, J.; Seidel, K.; Shirazi, M.; Elliott, S.D.; Ohsiek, S.; et al. TEMAZ/O3 atomic layer deposition process with doubled growth rate and optimized interface properties in metal–insulator–metal capacitors. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vac. Surf. Film. 2013, 31, 01A123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dey, S.K.; Wang, C.G.; Tang, D.; Kim, M.J.; Carpenter, R.W.; Werkhoven, C.; Shero, E. Atomic layer chemical vapor deposition of ZrO2-based dielectric films: Nanostructure and nanochemistry. J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 93, 4144–4157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wiemer, C.; Debernardi, A.; Lamperti, A.; Molle, A.; Salicio, O.; Lamagna, L.; Fanciulli, M. Influence of lattice parameters on the dielectric constant of tetragonal ZrO2 and La-doped ZrO2 crystals in thin films deposited by atomic layer deposition on Ge (001). Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 99, 232907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Putkonen, M.; Niinist, J.; Kukli, K.; Sajavaara, T.; Karppinen, M.; Yamauchi, H.; Niinist, L. ZrO2 thin films grown on silicon substrates by atomic layer deposition with Cp2Zr(CH3)2 and water as precursors. Chem. Vap. Depos. 2003, 9, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lee, B.; Choi, K.J.; Hande, A.; Kim, M.J.; Wallace, R.M.; Kim, J.; Suydam, J. A novel thermally-stable zirconium amidinate ALD precursor for ZrO2 thin films. Microelectron. Eng. 2009, 86, 272–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Niinist, J.; Kukli, K.; Kariniemi, M.; Ritala, M.; Leskel, M.; Blasco, N.; Dussarrat, C. Novel mixed alkylamido-cyclopentadienyl precursors for ALD of ZrO2 thin films. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 5243–5247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic description of solid oxide fuel cells employed in the application of atomic layer deposition to energy-based devices.
Figure 1. Schematic description of solid oxide fuel cells employed in the application of atomic layer deposition to energy-based devices.
Coatings 11 00362 g001
Figure 2. Molecular structure of CMEN-Zr employed in the plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition of zirconium oxide thin films.
Figure 2. Molecular structure of CMEN-Zr employed in the plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition of zirconium oxide thin films.
Coatings 11 00362 g002
Figure 3. Empirical condition for atomic layer deposition involving CMEN-Zr and oxygen plasma for zirconium and oxygen sources, respectively. (a) Deposition temperature: 150 °C, O2 plasma pulse time: 12 s, (b) deposition temperature: 150 °C, CMEN-Zr pulse time: 4.5 s, (c) cycle dependence of CMEN-Zr-based ZrO2 deposition (CMEN-Zr pulse time: 2.5 s, O2 plasma pulse time: 9 s) and (d) temperature dependence of ALD deposition (temperature: 150 °C, O2 CMEN-Zr pulse time: 2.5 s, plasma pulse time: 9 s).
Figure 3. Empirical condition for atomic layer deposition involving CMEN-Zr and oxygen plasma for zirconium and oxygen sources, respectively. (a) Deposition temperature: 150 °C, O2 plasma pulse time: 12 s, (b) deposition temperature: 150 °C, CMEN-Zr pulse time: 4.5 s, (c) cycle dependence of CMEN-Zr-based ZrO2 deposition (CMEN-Zr pulse time: 2.5 s, O2 plasma pulse time: 9 s) and (d) temperature dependence of ALD deposition (temperature: 150 °C, O2 CMEN-Zr pulse time: 2.5 s, plasma pulse time: 9 s).
Coatings 11 00362 g003
Figure 4. X-ray photoelectron spectrometry of ALD-based ZrO2 thin films: (a) survey spectrum, (b) core spectrum of Zr 3 d, (c) core spectrum of O 1 s. Sample information: deposition temperature: 150 °C, CMEN-Zr pulse time: 2.5 s, O2 plasma pulse time: 9 s, PEALD cycle: 400 cycles (~38 nm), substrate: P-type silicon.
Figure 4. X-ray photoelectron spectrometry of ALD-based ZrO2 thin films: (a) survey spectrum, (b) core spectrum of Zr 3 d, (c) core spectrum of O 1 s. Sample information: deposition temperature: 150 °C, CMEN-Zr pulse time: 2.5 s, O2 plasma pulse time: 9 s, PEALD cycle: 400 cycles (~38 nm), substrate: P-type silicon.
Coatings 11 00362 g004
Figure 5. X-ray diffraction acquired from the ALD-based ZrO2 thin films. Deposition temperature: 150 °C, CMEN-Zr pulse time: 2.5 s, O2 plasma pulse time: 9 s, PEALD cycle: 300 cycles (~27 nm), substrate: P-type silicon.
Figure 5. X-ray diffraction acquired from the ALD-based ZrO2 thin films. Deposition temperature: 150 °C, CMEN-Zr pulse time: 2.5 s, O2 plasma pulse time: 9 s, PEALD cycle: 300 cycles (~27 nm), substrate: P-type silicon.
Coatings 11 00362 g005
Figure 6. Cross-sectional electron microscopy analysis of (a) CMEN-Zr-based ZrO2 thin films and (b) bare Si substrates. Deposition temperature: 150 °C, CMEN-Zr pulse time: 2.5 s, O2 plasma pulse time: 9 s, PEALD cycle: 350 cycles (~30 nm), substrate: P-type silicon.
Figure 6. Cross-sectional electron microscopy analysis of (a) CMEN-Zr-based ZrO2 thin films and (b) bare Si substrates. Deposition temperature: 150 °C, CMEN-Zr pulse time: 2.5 s, O2 plasma pulse time: 9 s, PEALD cycle: 350 cycles (~30 nm), substrate: P-type silicon.
Coatings 11 00362 g006
Figure 7. Atomic force microscopy analysis of CMEN-Zr-based ZrO2 thin films. (a,b) ALD-deposited ZrO2 thin films (deposition temperature: 150 °C, CMEN-Zr pulse time: 2.5 s, O2 plasma pulse time: 9 s, PEALD cycle: 300 cycles (~27 nm)), (c,d) Si substrate: P-type silicon.
Figure 7. Atomic force microscopy analysis of CMEN-Zr-based ZrO2 thin films. (a,b) ALD-deposited ZrO2 thin films (deposition temperature: 150 °C, CMEN-Zr pulse time: 2.5 s, O2 plasma pulse time: 9 s, PEALD cycle: 300 cycles (~27 nm)), (c,d) Si substrate: P-type silicon.
Coatings 11 00362 g007
Figure 8. UV–visible spectrophotometric analysis of ALD-deposited ZrO2 thin films (deposition temperature: 150 °C, CMEN-Zr pulse time: 2.5 s, O2 plasma pulse time: 9 s, PEALD cycle: 350 cycles (~30 nm), substrate: borosilicate glass).
Figure 8. UV–visible spectrophotometric analysis of ALD-deposited ZrO2 thin films (deposition temperature: 150 °C, CMEN-Zr pulse time: 2.5 s, O2 plasma pulse time: 9 s, PEALD cycle: 350 cycles (~30 nm), substrate: borosilicate glass).
Coatings 11 00362 g008
Figure 9. Current–voltage characteristics of ALD-based ZrO2 using CMEN-Zr and oxygen plasma as zirconium and oxygen sources, respectively: as-deposited, annealed at 500 °C, and annealed at 600 °C.
Figure 9. Current–voltage characteristics of ALD-based ZrO2 using CMEN-Zr and oxygen plasma as zirconium and oxygen sources, respectively: as-deposited, annealed at 500 °C, and annealed at 600 °C.
Coatings 11 00362 g009
Figure 10. Capacitance–voltage measurements of ALD-based ZrO2 using CMEN-Zr and oxygen plasma as zirconium and oxygen sources, respectively: (a) as-deposited, (b) annealed at 500 °C and (c) annealed at 600 °C.
Figure 10. Capacitance–voltage measurements of ALD-based ZrO2 using CMEN-Zr and oxygen plasma as zirconium and oxygen sources, respectively: (a) as-deposited, (b) annealed at 500 °C and (c) annealed at 600 °C.
Coatings 11 00362 g010
Figure 11. Open cell voltages and current–voltage characteristics: (a) no PEALD of ZrO2, (b) PEALD ZrO2 with 50 cycles, and (c) PEALD ZrO2 with 200 cycles.
Figure 11. Open cell voltages and current–voltage characteristics: (a) no PEALD of ZrO2, (b) PEALD ZrO2 with 50 cycles, and (c) PEALD ZrO2 with 200 cycles.
Coatings 11 00362 g011
Figure 12. (a) Open cell voltages of reference cells and ZrO2 ALD cells, (b) maximum power of reference cells and ZrO2 ALD cells.
Figure 12. (a) Open cell voltages of reference cells and ZrO2 ALD cells, (b) maximum power of reference cells and ZrO2 ALD cells.
Coatings 11 00362 g012
Figure 13. Schematic diagram describing the role of ALD-based ZrO2 nanomaterials in the electrochemical performances of SOFC anodes.
Figure 13. Schematic diagram describing the role of ALD-based ZrO2 nanomaterials in the electrochemical performances of SOFC anodes.
Coatings 11 00362 g013
Table 1. Summarized electrical and dielectric characteristics obtained from the current ZrO2 and reported ZrO2 thin films.
Table 1. Summarized electrical and dielectric characteristics obtained from the current ZrO2 and reported ZrO2 thin films.
ZrI4ZTBZr(MEA)2 (guan-MEA)2Cp2Zr(CH3)2Zr-AMDZACCMEN-Zr
ALD typeThermal ALDPEALDThermal ALDThermal ALDThermal ALDThermal ALDPEALD
SubstrateP-type Si-(100) Si(100) SiP-type Si(100) SiP-type Si
Thickness [nm]4276~113.3~194.35.9~6.531.2~33.1
Annealing Condition-250 °C,
Air (1 h)
--450 °C, N2 + H2 (30 min)-600 °C, N2
(2 h)
Leakage Current Density [A/cm2]~107~108
(at 1 MV/cm)
2 × 10−1
(at −1.5 V)
8 × 10−3
(at 1 V)
10−6
(at 1 MV/cm)
2 × 10−3
(at −1 V)
10−7 (at 1 V)7.8 × 10−8
(at −1 MV/cm)
Breakdown Electric Field [MV/cm]2~2.5--1.9~9.5--−3.9~−4.7
Dielectric Constant18–242212~1812.51426–2820–25
ΔVFB [V]-0.03-0.25--0.6~2
Reference[18][19][23][30][31][32]This work
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oh, J.; Seo, G.; Kim, J.; Bae, S.; Park, J.-W.; Hwang, J.-H. Plasma-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition of Zirconium Oxide Thin Films and Its Application to Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Coatings 2021, 11, 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11030362

AMA Style

Oh J, Seo G, Kim J, Bae S, Park J-W, Hwang J-H. Plasma-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition of Zirconium Oxide Thin Films and Its Application to Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Coatings. 2021; 11(3):362. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11030362

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oh, Jiwon, Giwon Seo, Jaehwan Kim, Seungmuk Bae, Jeong-Woo Park, and Jin-Ha Hwang. 2021. "Plasma-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition of Zirconium Oxide Thin Films and Its Application to Solid Oxide Fuel Cells" Coatings 11, no. 3: 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11030362

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop