Next Article in Journal
Tuning the Optical Properties of WO3 Films Exhibiting a Zigzag Columnar Microstructure
Previous Article in Journal
Internal Factors Affecting the Surface Rumpling of a β-NiAlHf Coating
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Coatings
Volume 11
Issue 4
10.3390/coatings11040437
coatings-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High-Performance Graphene Coating on Titanium Bipolar Plates in Fuel Cells via Cathodic Electrophoretic Deposition

by
Yi Liu
,
Luofu Min
,
Wen Zhang
and
Yuxin Wang
*
State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Membrane Science and Desalination Technology, and School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2021, 11(4), 437; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11040437
Submission received: 25 March 2021 / Revised: 4 April 2021 / Accepted: 7 April 2021 / Published: 10 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Corrosion, Wear and Erosion)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this article, we proposed a facile method to electrophoretically deposit a highly conductive and corrosion-resistant graphene layer on metal bipolar plates (BPs) while avoiding the oxidation of the metal substrate during the electrophoretic deposition (EPD). p-Phenylenediamine (PPD) was first grafted onto negatively charged graphene oxide (GO) to obtain modified graphene oxide (MGO) while bearing positive charges. Then, MGO dispersed in ethanol was coated on titanium plates via cathodic EPD under a constant voltage, followed by reducing the deposited MGO with H2 at 400 °C, gaining a titanium plate coated with reduced MGO (RMGO@Ti). Under the simulated environment of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs), RMGO@Ti presents a corrosion current of < 10−6 A·cm−2, approximately two orders of magnitude lower than that of bare titanium. Furthermore, the interfacial contact resistance (ICR) of RMGO@Ti is as low as 4 mΩ·cm2, which is about one-thirtieth that of bare titanium. Therefore, RMGO@Ti appears very promising for use as BP in PEMFCs.

1. Introduction

Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) are a clean and highly efficient electrochemical devices that convert chemical energy directly into electrical energy, widely used as mobile, portable, and stationary power sources in a wide field of applications [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Bipolar plates (BPs) are a multifunctional component in PEMFCs, connecting single cells in a stack, conducting electric current between them, distributing fuel or oxidant to the electrodes, and separating the fuel and oxidant from the neighboring cells [7,10]. Consequently, the material to make BPs should exhibit high corrosion resistance, excellent electrical and thermal conductivity, and gas impermeability [11].
Graphite used to be the material of choice in BP manufacture [12]. While being an excellent corrosion-resistant conductor of electricity and heat, graphite is brittle and has poor manufacturability, which could lead to bulky and expensive PEMFC stacks [13,14,15,16]. To take advantages of graphite’s excellent properties while avoiding its drawbacks, various graphite–polymer and carbon–carbon composite BPs have been designed and explored [17,18,19,20,21]. Alavijeh et al. [20] used the bulk molding compound process to synthesize the graphite/nano-copper BP and found that the properties and efficiency of the nanocomposite were improved. Chen et al. [22] found that the graphene film self-assembled on aluminum BPs was highly conductive and corrosion resistant. Sim et al. [23] obtained poly(methyl methacrylate)-derived multilayer graphene coatings on nickel BP. Lopez-Oyama et al. [24] studied two methods of the reduced graphene oxide coatings on 304 L SS substrates. Stoot et al. [25] found the superior non-perfect multilayer graphene coating on stainless steel BPs. Weissbecker et al. [26] discussed the graphene-like coating to stainless steel, which advantageously has sufficient stability and the necessary electrical conductivity. Jiang et al. [19] enhanced the corrosion resistance of 304 stainless steel BP by electrodepositing polypyrrole–graphene oxide/polypyrrole–camphor sulfonic acid bilayer composite coating.
Metallic BP became more attractive in recent years on account of their many desirable physical properties [3,22,27,28,29], as well as their suitability for mass production with high efficiency. Currently, the most common materials to make metallic BPs are stainless steel, titanium, or aluminum, and the factors that guide the material choice are the corrosion-resistant, specific weight, mechanical strength, and cost of the metal. Unfortunately, none of these metals have satisfied corrosion-resistant in the harsh environment of PEMFCs. While passivated metal would increase interfacial contact resistance (ICR) and thus lower the power output, dissolved metal ions can poison the catalyst and hinder proton transport in PEMFCs [27].
These problems with metallic BP have led researchers to resort to coatings that conduct electricity and have better corrosion resistance. Hao et al. [30] deposited amorphous carbon (a–C) film on 316L stainless steel BPs using the direct current magnetron sputter technique. Cooper et al. [31] investigated a 316L stainless steel BP with bilayered titanium nitride (TiN)-polyaniline (PANI) coating. Khan et al. [32] compared the performance of TiN, chromium nitride (CrN), aluminum nitride titanium (AlTiN), and aluminum chromium nitride (AlCrN) coatings on 304 stainless steel BP. Marzo et al. [33] plated Ni–P and Ni–P–Cr coatings on aluminum alloy BPs by chemical deposition. Zhang et al. [34] coated zirconium carbide (ZrC) on titanium BPs by plasma technology. Gao et al. [35] used carbon/polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)/TiN composite coatings to enhance both the corrosion resistance and hydrophobicity of titanium BP. Xu et al. [36] showed that a cyanide zirconium (ZrCN) film can effectively protect titanium alloy BP. Despite the many efforts, coatings well meeting the requirements of metallic BP are still rare and the coating methods employed often suffer from high cost or low efficiency. There is still an urgent need for coating material and coating methods for metallic BP improvement.
In this paper, we propose an approach to coat graphene via electrophoresis for protecting metallic BP, using a titanium plate as an example. The two-dimensional graphene, with its outstanding chemical stability, electron mobility, and thermal conductivity [37], is a satisfied conductive coating material. While the electrophoretic coating method has been widely adopted in the industry because of its high manufacturability and cost-effectiveness. Graphene oxide (GO), the widely available source of graphene, is modified with p-phenylenediamine (PPD) following Hwang et al. [38]. The modified graphene oxide (MGO) bears positive charges and is electrophoretically deposited on the cathode to prevent the possible oxidation of metallic substrate during the deposition. The MGO deposited on titanium plate is finally reduced to graphene, or more precisely to reduced MGO (RMGO), with H2 at 400 °C to obtain the desired protective coating.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Reagents

Titanium plates (Ta1, 0.08 mm) were bought from Jinbu Titanium Nickel Equipment Manufacturing Co., Baoji, China. Graphite powder (≥99%, 40 μm) was supplied by Xianfeng Nano Co., Nanjing, China. For other materials, see Supporting Materials for details.

2.2. Sample Preparation

GO was obtained from graphite flakes following an improved Hummers method [39]. MGO was prepared according to Ref. [40]. See Supporting Materials for details.
The coating agent was MGO dispersed in ethanol with the MGO concentration of 0.5 mg·mL−1. Before each electrophoretic deposition (EPD), the coating agent was ultrasonicated for 2 h to ensure the homogeneous dispersion of MGO and adjusted to pH 2 with acetic acid.
The as-received titanium plate (Ti-Unpretreated) was polished with sandpapers successively, from 300 to 2000 grit, to remove its passivation layer. The polished titanium plate was ultrasonically cleaned in acetone and ethanol in succession, each for 10 min. Finally, it was immersed in a 20 wt.% oxalic acid solution at 90 °C for 0.5 h to further clear away the passivation layer on the surface of the titanium plate, and then we got a pretreated titanium plate (Ti-pretreated).
The cathodic electrophoretic MGO deposition on titanium plate was achieved employing a DC power cell (UTP1306S, UNI-TREND Technology (China) Co. Ltd., Shenzhen, China) with Ti-Pretreated and a carbon plate, placed 15 mm apart from each other, immersed in the coating agent at room temperature. A constant voltage of 15 V is exerted across the two plates for 1.5 h to obtain MGO-coated titanium plate (MGO@Ti), which was then taken out and dried at 25 °C for one day. Afterward, the dried MGO@Ti sample was heat-treated at 400 °C in H2 atmosphere for 2 h, leaving a titanium plate coated with reduced MGO (RMGO@Ti). After cooling to room temperature, the samples of RMGO@Ti were stored in a polyethylene bag before being characterized or tested.
For comparison, the samples of GO-coated titanium plate (GO@Ti) were prepared via anodic electrophoresis. The preparation method was similar to the cathodic EPD of MGO described above, except that the coating agent was replaced with GO dispersed in aqueous with the GO concentration of 0.5 mg·mL−1, the polarity of titanium and carbon plate reversed, and the coating time reduced to 0.5 h. To obtain reduced GO on the titanium plate (RGO@Ti), the coated GO was reduced following the same method as in reducing the coated MGO.

2.3. Characterization and Electrochemical Corrosion Tests

The wide-angle X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of samples were recorded with a Brook D8-FOCUS X-ray diffractometer (BRUKER AXS, Ltd., Karlsruhe, Germany). Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR) of samples were collected on a Nicolet 6700 spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were recorded on a Thermo Electron PHI-5000 Versaprobe II instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). The Raman spectrum was recorded via a Raman spectrometer (LabRAM HR Evolution, HORIBA Trading Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan). Scanning electron microscope analysis (SEM, S-4800, Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was conducted to study the morphologies of the samples. The surface charge carried by MGO in the coating agent was detected via a zeta-potential analyzer (Zetasizer Nano ZS, Malvern, Malvern, England). A contact angle goniometer (JC-2000C1, POWER EACH, Shanghai, China) was conducted to study the surface hydrophilicity.
Electrochemical measurements were carried out with a three-electrode cell connected to the electrochemical workstation (PARSTAT 2273, AMETEK, PA, USA). For the samples to be measured, a platinum plate and a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) served as the working, counter, and reference electrode, respectively. All samples to be tested were made to expose an area of 1 cm2 to the electrolyte, with the rest covered by a silicone rubber coating. The electrolyte was a mixture containing 0.5 mol·L−1 H2SO4 and 2 ppm hydrofluoric acid with air or H2 bubbling to emulate the cathodic or anodic environment of PEMFCs. The corrosion current density (Icorr) and corrosion potential (Ecorr) were measured by both potentiodynamic and potentiostatic polarization methods. Before polarization tests, the samples to be tested were stable at open circuit potential (OCP) in the electrolyte for 1 h. The potentiodynamic polarization test was performed through potential scanning centered in the OCP at the rate of 1 mV·s−1. During the potentiostatic polarization test, the applied potential was −0.1 V or 0.6 V (vs. SCE) for anodic or cathodic polarization, respectively.

2.4. ICR Measurements

The ICR between the sample and carbon papers (TGPH-060, Toray, Tokyo, Japan) was calculated based on the method presented in our previous papers [10,22]. The schematic diagram of the measuring cell is displayed in Figure S1. The ICR was calculated using Equation (1):
ICR = ( R 2 − R 1 − R cp ) × A 2
where R1 is the sum of the carbon paper bulk resistance Rcp and the contact resistance between the copper electrode and the carbon papers, which is measured by inserting one piece of carbon paper between the measuring electrodes. R2 is the total value measured when the sample placed between two pieces of carbon paper is set in between the measuring electrodes. A is the practical contact area between the sample and carbon paper.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization

The FTIR spectra of GO and MGO indicate that PPD has been attached to GO after the modification (Figure 1a). In comparison with the spectrum of GO, three new peaks appear at 1515, 1173, and 819 cm−1 in the spectrum of MGO, respectively. These are corresponding to the absorption of –C–NH2, –C–N–, and –N–H– groups in PPD and its linkage with GO [41], indicating that MGO is GO grafted chemically with PPD. This is confirmed by the results of XPS (Figure S3), in which a –C–N– peak at 258.9 eV is identified (Figure S3b), suggesting a chemical linkage between GO and PPD.
GO was partially reduced during the modification process. The FTIR spectrum of GO presents four peaks at 1060, 1620, 1730, and 3400 cm−1, which are consistent with the vibrations of –C–O–C–, C=C, –COOH, and –OH in GO [42]. It was noticed that the peaks of –COOH and –C–O–C–, at 1730 and 1060 cm−1, respectively, become weak or disappear in the spectrum of MGO, indicating that GO was partially reduced. The partial reduction in GO during the modification was also revealed by XPS (Figures S3 and S4), Raman (Figure S2a), and XRD (Figure S2b). The grafting of PPD to GO would be a direct cause of the reduction [34]. The thermal reduction of GO may also happen during the modification, considering the temperature and time experienced.
The successive H2 treatment of MGO@Ti at high temperature further reduces its coating, as evidenced by XPS results. Figure 1c,d show that the O1s peak of RMGO@Ti is markedly smaller than that of MGO@Ti, indicating that the O-containing groups of the former are much less than that of the latter. It is noted that the N-containing groups of RMGO@Ti are also less than that of MGO@Ti, for the N1s peak of RMGO@Ti is smaller. C1s spectrum also reveals that the peak of –C–N groups shrink as MGO@Ti is changed to RMGO@Ti (Figure S3c,d). The lessened N-containing groups in RMGO@Ti suggest that PPD undergoes partial degradation during the high-temperature H2 treatment.
While GO commonly carries negative charges [37,43,44], the PPD modification transforms GO into positively charged MGO as demonstrated by the zeta potential measurement (Figure 1b). The zeta potential of MGO at pH 2 is above 30 mV, sufficient for the MGO flakes to be mutually repellent [45] and thus stably dispersed in ethanol. The positive charges in the low pH range are presumably due to the protonation of nitrogen-containing groups in MGO [38], i.e., NH2–MGO → N+H3–MGO. Sufficient positive charges bearing by MGO are important not only for its stable dispersion but also for enabling its cathodic EPD on metal plates. With increasing pH, the zeta potential of MGO decreases (Figure 1b), which is a consequence of the counteraction by its residual carboxyl groups, which tend to dissociate more completely at higher pH.
The microscopic images of different samples are shown in Figure 2. It can be noted that the surface of Ti-Pretreated is very rough (Figure 2a), which should benefit the bonding between the titanium surface and MGO layer. A wrinkled texture, characteristic of GO, is seen on the surface of MGO@Ti (Figure 2b). The reduction in MGO with high-temperature H2 has hardly changed the surface morphology of the sample, i.e., RMGO@Ti (Figure 2c). This is different from our previous paper, in which the wrinkled GO surface became smooth after H2 reduction [10]. In the case of MGO, presumably, the grafted PPD hinders the rearrangement of graphene flakes during H2 treatment. The cross-sectional image of RMGO@Ti, together with the C and Ti profiles along the vertical direction, indicates that the RMGO layer on top of the titanium plate has a thickness of about 2 μm (Figure 2d).

3.2. Electrochemical Corrosion Tests

The potentiodynamic polarization curves for Ti-Unpretreated, Ti-Pretreated, MGO@Ti, and RMGO@Ti samples under the simulated PEMFC environment are shown in Figure 3a,c. The respective corrosion current density (Icorr) and corrosion potential (Ecorr) of the samples are summed up in Table 1. Ti-Unpretreated shows the Icorrs of 9.78 × 10−6 and 4.95 × 10−6 A·cm−2, while Ti-Pretreated possesses the Icorrs of 1.88 × 10−5 and 2.91 × 10−5 A·cm−2. As the well-known anticorrosion property of metal titanium stems from a passivation layer on its surface, the relatively low Icorr of Ti-Unpretreated, as compared with Ti-Pretreated, is easily understandable. However, the passivation layer on bare titanium cannot sufficiently resist the corrosion of bare titanium in the PEMFC environment, as evidenced by the Icorrs (see Table 1 and Table 2) of Ti-Unpretreated. Therefore, a more corrosion-resistant coating for titanium is necessary if it is to be used in PEMFC. Graphene is confirmed as suitable for such coating, as both graphene-coated samples MGO@Ti and RMGO@Ti show a markedly lower corrosion current and raised corrosion potential as compared with the bare titanium samples Ti-Unpretreated and Ti-Pretreated (Table 1). In particular, RMGO@Ti presents the lowest Icorr, 7.55 × 10−7 and 7.52 × 10−7 A·cm−2 separately under the simulated anodic and cathodic PEMFC environment. As a comparison, MGO@Ti exhibits the Icorrs of 3.37 × 10−6 and 1.58 × 10−6 A·cm−2 under the simulated anodic and cathodic PEMFC environment. The higher graphitization degree and hydrophobicity of RMGO@Ti over MGO@Ti (see Figures S3 and S5) might explain the better corrosion resistance of RMGO@Ti than that of MGO@Ti. It is worth mentioning that RMGO@Ti well satisfies the US Department of Energy (DOE) 2020 target for Icorr of BPs [46], i.e., ≤ 10−6 A·cm−2. Regarding corrosion resistance, RMGO@Ti is also among the superior different coated titanium plates published to date which are intended for BP application (as shown in Table S3).
The potentiostatic polarization curves of Ti-Unpretreated, Ti-Pretreated, MGO@Ti, and RMGO@Ti samples in the simulated PEMFC environment are shown in Figure 3b,d, while the respective Icorr of the samples is summarized in Table 2. RMGO@Ti displays the Icorrs of 2.64 × 10−7 and 2.94 × 10−7 A·cm−2 under the simulated anodic and cathodic PEMFC environment. As expected, the Icorrs of RMGO@Ti under potentiostatic and potentiodynamic polarizations are very similar, consistent with the results of graphene-coated metal plates previously reported [10,47]. It is worth mentioning that the Icorrs of RMGO@Ti under anodic and cathodic PEMFC conditions are not only low enough to meet the US DOE 2020 target [46], but also quite flat during the 5 h tests, showing no tendency of further increase. Moreover, the surface morphology of RMGO@Ti presents no sign of degradation after the 5 h tests (Figure S6). These results indicate that the graphene layer deposited via cathodic electrophoresis can be highly corrosion-resistant and stable.

3.3. ICR Measurements

The ICR of BPs must be taken care of in addition to corrosion resistance. As ICR adversely affects the power output of PEMFCs and more so with the increased output current [48]. The ICRs of a few titanium-based samples varied with compaction force are shown in Figure 4. It is seen that the ICRs of all the samples tested decrease with increased pressure. The ICR of Ti-Unpretreated decreases from 499.85 mΩ·cm2 at 30 N·cm−2 to 173.62 mΩ·cm2 at 180 N·cm−2. However, RMGO@Ti stands out for its low ICR (14.56 mΩ·cm2 at 30 N·cm−2 and 3.98 mΩ·cm2 at 180 N·cm−2), which is noticeably lower than the lowermost ICRs of other samples even at a very small compaction force. RMGO@Ti is also among the superior different coated titanium plates published to date concerning ICR (as shown in Table S3). As the bulk resistance of the coating is included in ICR, the very low ICR of RMGO@Ti could be attributed to its sufficient MGO reduction and higher graphitization degree, for it explains the much higher ICR of MGO@Ti and GO@Ti over RMGO@Ti. Another important factor should be that the specific coating strategy, i.e., cathodic electrophoresis, can effectively avoid forming a passivation layer on titanium during graphene deposition, which explains the fact that the ICRs of MGO@Ti and RMGO@Ti are lower than that of GO@Ti and RGO@Ti, respectively. Indeed, the conventional anodic EPD of graphene, as in the case of GO@Ti and RGO@Ti, results in a passivation layer on titanium substrate as evidenced by EDS analysis (Figure S10). Lastly, the ICR of RMGO@Ti about 4 mΩ·cm2 translates into a through-plate resistance (TPR) of approximately 8 mΩ·cm2, as the bulk resistance of metal titanium is orders of magnitude lower and thus neglectable [49]. Therefore, RMGO@Ti meets the US DOE 2020 target of BPs’ areal specific resistance being less than 10 mΩ·cm2 [46].

4. Conclusions

We report the preparation of a graphene-coated titanium plate for high-performance bipolar plates in proton exchange membrane fuel cells with an industrially viable method. Coating graphene oxide on titanium by cathodic electrophoretic deposition while preventing metal oxidation is enabled by a prior modification of graphene oxide precursor with p-phenylenediamine, and then the coating was reduced to graphene by H2 heat treatment. Morphology characterizations demonstrate that the graphene coating is smooth and dense, and the thickness of it is 2 μm. The resulting graphene-coated titanium plate shows the corrosion current of 10−7 A·cm−2 in a simulated proton exchange membrane fuel cells’ environment, and the interfacial contact resistance of 4 mΩ·cm2, reaching the US DOE 2020 target for bipolar plates. Therefore, our method to coat graphene on titanium appears very promising for preparing high-performance metal bipolar plates in proton exchange membrane fuel cells.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/coatings11040437/s1, Table S1: Potentiodynamic Icorr and Ecorr of three RMGO@Ti samples, Table S2: Potentiostatic Icorr of three RMGO@Ti samples, Table S3: A summarization of the performance of different coated titanium plates, Table S4: Elements quantitative results, Figure S1: Schematic diagram of the device for ICR, Figure S2: (a) Raman spectra; and (b) XRD spectra of GO and MGO, Figure S3: C1s XPS spectra of (a) GO; (b) MGO; (c) MGO@Ti; and (d) RMGO@Ti, Figure S4: The full XPS spectra of (a) GO; and (b) MGO, Figure S5: The static water contact angles on (a) MGO@Ti; and (b) RMGO@Ti, Figure S6: Surface SEM images of RMGO@Ti after electrochemical measurements, Figure S7: Through-plate resistance (TPR) of Ti-Unpretreated, MGO@Ti, and RMGO@Ti, Figure S8: Surface SEM images of (a,b) RMGO@Ti/pH = 3.0, and (c,d) RMGO@Ti/pH = 4, Figure S9: Electrochemical measurements curves for RMGO@Ti/pH = 2.0, RMGO@Ti/pH = 3.0, RMGO@Ti/pH = 4.0 under anodic (a,b), and cathodic (c,d) conditions, Figure S10: EDS element compositions of Ti-Pretreated, Ti-Anodized/Water, Ti-Anodized/GO.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.W.; methodology, Y.W. and Y.L.; software, Y.L.; validation, Y.L., L.M. and W.Z.; formal analysis, Y.L.; investigation, Y.L.; resources, Y.W.; data curation, Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.W. and Y.L.; visualization, Y.L.; supervision, Y.W.; project administration, Y.W. and W.Z.; funding acquisition, Y.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering and the Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities, grant number B06006.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are presented in the current manuscript and Supplementary Material.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Agarwal, H.; Pandey, R.; Bhat, S.D. Improved polymer electrolyte fuel cell performance with membrane electrode assemblies using modified metallic plate: Comparative study on impact of various coatings. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 18731–18742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Madadi, F.; Rezaeian, A.; Edris, H.; Zhiani, M. Improving performance in PEMFC by applying different coatings to metallic bipolar plates. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2019, 238, 121911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Alnegren, P.; Grolig, J.G.; Ekberg, J.; Goransson, G.; Svensson, J.-E. Metallic Bipolar Plates for High Temperature Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells. Fuel Cells 2016, 16, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Abeyrathna, B.; Zhang, P.; Pereira, M.P.; Wilkosz, D.; Weiss, M. Micro-roll forming of stainless steel bipolar plates for fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 3861–3875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wilberforce, T.; Ijaodola, O.; Ogungbemi, E.; Khatib, F.; Leslie, T.; El-Hassan, Z.; Thomposon, J.; Olabi, A. Technical evaluation of proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell performance—A review of the effects of bipolar plates coating. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bhosale, A.C.; Rengaswamy, R. Interfacial contact resistance in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: Recent developments and challenges. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 115, 109351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hermann, A.; Chaudhuri, T.; Spagnol, P. Bipolar plates for PEM fuel cells: A review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2005, 30, 1297–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Antunes, R.A.; Oliveira, M.C.L.; Ett, G.; Ett, V. Corrosion of metal bipolar plates for PEM fuel cells: A review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 3632–3647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, C.; Zhang, W.; Mu, Y.; Fang, F.; Huang, C.; Wang, Y. Facile fabrication of holey graphene oxide paper bonded with sulfonic acid for highly efficient proton conduction. Ionics 2018, 25, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, J.; Min, L.; Fang, F.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Y. Electrodeposition of graphene nano-thick coating for highly enhanced performance of titanium bipolar plates in fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 16909–16917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Allahkaram, S.R.; Mohammadi, N. Corrosion behavior of two candidate PEMFC’s bipolar plate materials. Anti-Corros. Methods Mater. 2017, 64, 293–298. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang, W.; Yi, P.; Peng, L.; Lai, X. Strategy of alternating bias voltage on corrosion resistance and interfacial conductivity enhancement of TiCx/a-C coatings on metallic bipolar plates in PEMFCs. Energy 2018, 162, 933–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tawfik, H.; Hung, Y.; Mahajan, D. Metal bipolar plates for PEM fuel cell—A review. J. Power Sources 2007, 163, 755–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Asri, N.F.; Husaini, T.; Sulong, A.B.; Majlan, E.H.; Daud, W.R.W. Coating of stainless steel and titanium bipolar plates for anticorrosion in PEMFC: A review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 9135–9148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Saadat, N.; Dhakal, H.N.; Jaffer, S.; Tjong, J.; Yang, W.; Tan, J.; Sain, M. Expanded and nano-structured carbonaceous graphite for high performance anisotropic fuel cell polymer composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2021, 207, 108654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Weissbecker, V.; Wippermann, K.; Lehnert, W. Electrochemical Corrosion Study of Metallic Materials in Phosphoric Acid as Bipolar Plates for HT-PEFCs. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2014, 161, F1437–F1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Husby, H.; Kongstein, O.E.; Oedegaard, A.; Seland, F. Carbon-polymer composite coatings for PEM fuel cell bipolar plates. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 951–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sadeghian, Z.; Hadidi, M.R.; Salehzadeh, D.; Nemati, A. Hydrophobic octadecylamine-functionalized graphene/TiO2 hybrid coating for corrosion protection of copper bipolar plates in simulated proton exchange membrane fuel cell environment. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 15380–15389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jiang, L.; Syed, J.A.; Zhang, G.; Ma, Y.; Ma, J.; Lu, H.; Meng, X. Enhanced anticorrosion performance of PPY-graphene oxide/PPY-camphorsulfonic acid composite coating for 304SS bipolar plates in proton exchange membrane fuel cell. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 80, 497–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alavijeh, M.S.; Kefayati, H.; Golikand, A.N.; Shariati, S. Synthesis and characterization of epoxy/graphite/nano-copper nanocomposite for the fabrication of bipolar plate for PEMFCs. J. Nanostruct. Chem. 2019, 9, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Lee, Y.H.; Noh, S.; Lee, J.-H.; Chun, S.-H.; Cha, S.W.; Chang, I. Durable graphene-coated bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 27350–27353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, P.; Fang, F.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Y. Self-assembled graphene film to enable highly conductive and corrosion resistant aluminum bipolar plates in fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 12593–12600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sim, Y.; Kwak, J.; Kim, S.-Y.; Jo, Y.; Kim, S.; Kim, S.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, C.-S.; Jo, J.H.; Kwon, S.-Y. Formation of 3D graphene–Ni foam heterostructures with enhanced performance and durability for bipolar plates in a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 6, 1504–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. López-Oyama, A.; Domínguez-Crespo, M.; Torres-Huerta, A.; Onofre-Bustamante, E.; Gámez-Corrales, R.; Cayetano-Castro, N. Electrochemical alternative to obtain reduced graphene oxide by pulse potential: Effect of synthesis parameters and study of corrosion properties. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2018, 88, 167–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Stoot, A.C.; Camilli, L.; Spiegelhauer, S.-A.; Yu, F.; Bøggild, P. Multilayer graphene for long-term corrosion protection of stainless steel bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. J. Power Sources 2015, 293, 846–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Weissbecker, V.; Lehnert, W.; Reimer, U. Bipolar Plate for Electrochemical Cells and Method for the Production Thereof. U.S. Patent 10,418,643 B2, 17 September 2019. [Google Scholar]
  27. Stein, T.; Ein-Eli, Y. Challenges and perspectives of metal-based proton exchange membrane’s bipolar plates: Exploring durability and longevity. Energy Technol. 2020, 8, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Elyasi, M.; Khatir, F.A.; Hosseinzadeh, M. Manufacturing metallic bipolar plate fuel cells through rubber pad forming process. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 89, 3257–3269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Weissbecker, V.; Reimer, U.; Wippermann, K.; Lehnert, W. A Comprehensive Corrosion Study on Metallic Materials for HT-PEFC Application. ECS Trans. 2013, 58, 693–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Li, H.; Guo, P.; Zhang, D.; Liu, L.; Wang, Z.; Ma, G.; Xin, Y.; Ke, P.; Saito, H.; Wang, A. Interface-induced degradation of amorphous carbon films/stainless steel bipolar plates in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Power Sources 2020, 469, 228269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cooper, L.; El-Kharouf, A. Titanium Nitride Polyaniline Bilayer Coating for Metallic Bipolar Plates used in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells. Fuel Cells 2020, 20, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Khan, M.F.; Adesina, A.Y.; Gasem, Z.M. Electrochemical and electrical resistance behavior of cathodic arc PVD TiN, CrN, AlCrN, and AlTiN coatings in simulated proton exchange membrane fuel cell environment. Mater. Corros. 2019, 70, 281–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Marzo, F.; Alberro, M.; Manso, A.; Garikano, X.; Alegre, C.; Montiel, M.; Lozano, A.; Barreras, F. Evaluation of the corrosion resistance of Ni(P)Cr coatings for bipolar plates by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 20632–20646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, P.; Han, Y.T.; Shi, J.F.; Li, T.; Wang, H.Y.; Sun, J.C. ZrC Coating Modified Ti Bipolar Plate for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell. Fuel Cells 2020, 20, 540–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gao, P.; Xie, Z.; Wu, X.; Ouyang, C.; Lei, T.; Yang, P.; Liu, C.; Wang, J.; Ouyang, T.; Huang, Q. Development of Ti bipolar plates with carbon/PTFE/TiN composites coating for PEMFCs. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 20947–20958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xu, J.; Huang, H.J.; Li, Z.; Xu, S.; Tao, H.; Munroe, P.; Xie, Z.-H. Corrosion behavior of a ZrCN coated Ti alloy with potential application as a bipolar plate for proton exchange membrane fuel cell. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 663, 718–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Li, D.; Müller, M.B.; Gilje, S.; Kaner, R.B.; Wallace, G.G. Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hwang, M.-J.; Kim, M.-G.; Kim, S.; Kim, Y.C.; Seo, H.W.; Cho, J.K.; Park, I.-K.; Suhr, J.; Moon, H.; Koo, J.C.; et al. Cathodic electrophoretic deposition (EPD) of phenylenediamine-modified graphene oxide (GO) for anti-corrosion protection of metal surfaces. Carbon 2019, 142, 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hummers, W.S.; Offeman, R.E. Preparation of Graphitic Oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yu, P.; Ma, Y. Stable dispersions of graphene and highly conducting graphene films: A new approach to creating colloids of graphene monolayers. Chem. Commun. 2009, 4527–4529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Ma, H.-L.; Zhang, H.-B.; Hu, Q.-H.; Li, W.-J.; Jiang, Z.-G.; Yu, Z.-Z.; Dasari, A. Functionalization and Reduction of Graphene Oxide with p-Phenylene Diamine for Electrically Conductive and Thermally Stable Polystyrene Composites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 1948–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, M.-J.; Liu, C.-M.; Xie, Y.-B.; Cao, H.-B.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, Y. The evolution of surface charge on graphene oxide during the reduction and its application in electroanalysis. Carbon 2014, 66, 302–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Baskoro, F.; Wong, C.-B.; Kumar, S.R.; Chang, C.-W.; Chen, C.-H.; Chen, D.W.; Lue, S.J. Graphene oxide-cation interaction: Inter-layer spacing and zeta potential changes in response to various salt solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 2018, 554, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Feng, J.; Ye, Y.; Xiao, M.; Wu, G.; Ke, Y. Synthetic routes of the reduced graphene oxide. Chem. Pap. 2020, 74, 3767–3783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Everett, D.H. Basic Principles of Colloid Science; Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC): London, UK, 2007; pp. 9–15. [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang, C. Novel Structured Metal Bipolar Plates for Low Cost Manufacturing; US Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2015: Anaheim, CA, USA, 2015.
  47. Zeng, Y.; He, Z.; Hua, Q.; Xu, Q.; Min, Y. Polyacrylonitrile Infused in a Modified Honeycomb Aluminum Alloy Bipolar Plate and Its Acid Corrosion Resistance. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 16976–16985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Gago, A.; Ansar, S.; Saruhan, B.; Schulz, U.; Lettenmeier, P.; Cañas, N.A.; Gazdzicki, P.; Morawietz, T.; Hiesgen, R.; Arnold, J.; et al. Protective coatings on stainless steel bipolar plates for proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysers. J. Power Sources 2016, 307, 815–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Haynes, W. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014; pp. 12–235. [Google Scholar]
Coatings 11 00437 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) FTIR spectra, (b) zeta potential of graphene oxide (GO) and modified graphene oxide (MGO) the full XPS spectra of (c) MGO@Ti, (d) RMGO@Ti.
Figure 1. (a) FTIR spectra, (b) zeta potential of graphene oxide (GO) and modified graphene oxide (MGO) the full XPS spectra of (c) MGO@Ti, (d) RMGO@Ti.
Coatings 11 00437 g001
Coatings 11 00437 g002 550
Figure 2. Surface SEM images of (a) Ti-Pretreated; (b) MGO@Ti; (c) RMGO@Ti; and (d) the cross-sectional SEM image of RMGO@Ti, with Ti (red) and C (green) profiles via EDS line scan.
Figure 2. Surface SEM images of (a) Ti-Pretreated; (b) MGO@Ti; (c) RMGO@Ti; and (d) the cross-sectional SEM image of RMGO@Ti, with Ti (red) and C (green) profiles via EDS line scan.
Coatings 11 00437 g002
Coatings 11 00437 g003 550
Figure 3. Electrochemical measurements curves for Ti-Unpretreated, Ti-Pretreated, MGO@Ti, and RMGO@Ti under anodic (a,b), and cathodic (c,d) conditions.
Figure 3. Electrochemical measurements curves for Ti-Unpretreated, Ti-Pretreated, MGO@Ti, and RMGO@Ti under anodic (a,b), and cathodic (c,d) conditions.
Coatings 11 00437 g003
Coatings 11 00437 g004 550
Figure 4. The interfacial contact resistance (ICR) of Ti-Unpretreated, MGO@Ti, RMGO@Ti, GO@Ti, and RGO@Ti.
Figure 4. The interfacial contact resistance (ICR) of Ti-Unpretreated, MGO@Ti, RMGO@Ti, GO@Ti, and RGO@Ti.
Coatings 11 00437 g004
Table
Table 1. Potentiodynamic Icorr and Ecorr of samples in the simulated proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) environment.
Table 1. Potentiodynamic Icorr and Ecorr of samples in the simulated proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) environment.
SamplesAnodeCathode
Icorr (A·cm−2)Ecorr (V)Icorr (A·cm−2)Ecorr (V)
Ti-Unpretreated9.78 × 10−6−0.4964.95 × 10−6−0.128
Ti-Pretreated1.88 × 10−5−0.5612.91 × 10−5−0.295
MGO@Ti3.37 × 10−6−0.3331.58 × 10−60.067
RMGO@Ti7.55 × 10−7−0.1777.52 × 10−70.019
Table
Table 2. Potentiostatic Icorr of the samples in the simulated PEMFC environment.
Table 2. Potentiostatic Icorr of the samples in the simulated PEMFC environment.
SamplesIcorr (A·cm−2)
AnodeCathode
Ti-Unpretreated7.41 × 10−64.30 × 10−6
Ti-Pretreated2.03 × 10−51.66 × 10−5
MGO@Ti1.22 × 10−62.09 × 10−6
RMGO@Ti2.64 × 10−72.94 × 10−7
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Min, L.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Y. High-Performance Graphene Coating on Titanium Bipolar Plates in Fuel Cells via Cathodic Electrophoretic Deposition. Coatings 2021, 11, 437. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11040437

AMA Style

Liu Y, Min L, Zhang W, Wang Y. High-Performance Graphene Coating on Titanium Bipolar Plates in Fuel Cells via Cathodic Electrophoretic Deposition. Coatings. 2021; 11(4):437. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11040437

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yi, Luofu Min, Wen Zhang, and Yuxin Wang. 2021. "High-Performance Graphene Coating on Titanium Bipolar Plates in Fuel Cells via Cathodic Electrophoretic Deposition" Coatings 11, no. 4: 437. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11040437

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop