Next Article in Journal
Preparation and Characterization of Functional Films Based on Chitosan and Corn Starch Incorporated Tea Polyphenols
Next Article in Special Issue
Chemical Composition and Corrosion Behavior of a-C:H/DLC Film-Coated Titanium Substrate in Simulated PEMFC Environment
Previous Article in Journal
Structure and Properties of DLC Films Deposited on Mg Alloy at Different C2H2 Flows of Magnetron Sputtering Process
Previous Article in Special Issue
Discrete Coating of CNT on Carbon Fiber Surfaces and the Effect on Improving the Electrochemical Performance of VRFB Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fabrication and Sterilization Characteristics of Visible Light Photocatalyst of CuO/ZrO2/CB/Coal-Tar-Pitch-SAC

1
Key Laboratory of Energy Materials and Electrochemistry Research Liaoning Province, University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan 114051, China
2
Advanced Science Research Laboratory, Saitama Institute of Technology, Fusaiji 1690, Japan
3
Qidian Photocatlyst Co., Ltd., Anshan 114051, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2021, 11(7), 816; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11070816
Submission received: 1 June 2021 / Revised: 30 June 2021 / Accepted: 1 July 2021 / Published: 6 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Surface Modification and Functionalization for Advanced Materials)

Abstract

:
To provide an effective method of green aquaculture, the photocatalysts of CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC, which have visible light sterilization capacity, were successfully fabricated by coating ZrO2 and CuO on the surface of CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC. The structures of synthesized CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC were investigated by XRD, XPS and SEM measurements in detail. It was observed that CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials possess obvious heterojunction structure and excellent visible light sterilization capacity when the prepared weight ratio of CuO, ZrO2 and CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC is controlled as 0.03:0.3:1. Our studies can provide a beneficial reference for the design of photocatalysts with sterilization capacity in visible light.

1. Introduction

Overuse of antibiotic and chemical reagents is becoming a popular aquaculture practice in China. This process severely worsens water quality and threatens the safety of food. Additionally, long-term usage of antibiotic and chemical reagents also causes the harmful bacteria to produce strong resistance to drugs. Oxidant reagents and electrolysis methods are also widely utilized in treating aquaculture [1,2,3,4,5]. Although these methods are capable of sterilization, the water quality is damaged. Therefore, how to develop environmentally friendly sterilizing reagents to achieve green aquaculture is becoming a pivotal issue that urgently needs to be solved. Photocatalysts are of particular interest because they exhibit excellent sterilization ability and environmentally friendly characteristics. In particular, TiO2 as a photocatalyst has attracted much attention since it was reported by Fujishima et al. [6,7].
It is well-known that coating catalysts on the surface of active carbon (AC) is an effective way to enhance the catalyst activity [8,9]. Recently, our research group explored TiO2 and coal-tar-pitch based spherical activated carbon containing carbon black (CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC) and successfully prepared the novel photocatalyst of TiO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC [10]. Strong sterilization characteristics of TiO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC were observed and described in detail. Interestingly, TiO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC also possesses sterilization capacity under irradiation of visible light. Our studies further indicated that CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC as a photocatalyst support can enhance the activities of photocatalysts due to its large surface area, excellent conductivity, good fluidity and other traits.
On the other hand, it is acknowledged that the ZrO2 compound possesses high wear resistance [11]. Thus, in order to increase the durability of the photocatalyst in actual sterilization cases, ZrO2 as a photocatalyst should be considered preferentially. Nevertheless, the fact that ZrO2 compound possesses a broad valance band (5.0 eV) makes excitation by visible light difficult [11,12,13,14].
In general, fabricating the heterojunction among different semi-conductors is an effective way to improve the photosensitivity of metal oxides such as ZrO2, TiO2, ZnO and so on [15,16,17,18,19,20]. CuO is extensively used to fabricate photocatalysts with complex type because it possesses a narrow valance band (1.4 eV) [21]. As an example, Zhu et al. deposited CuO nanoparticles on the surface of ZnO so as to fabricate CuO/ZnO composite materials with 0D/3D structures. The fabricated materials possess excellent photodegradation for phenol with a degradation rate of 78.0% [22]. Additionally, CeO2/CuO composite materials were fabricated with a facile co-precipitation method, and their high photodegradation for methylene blue (degradation rate of 85.7%) was observed and reported [23].
Thus, on the basis of aforementioned descriptions, in this presented study, we also attempted to use the formation of a heterojunction among both metal oxides of CuO and ZnO2 to improve the photosensitivity of ZrO2. Referring to our presented studies on fabrication of TiO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC, we firstly and successfully prepared the novel CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC photocatalyst by using the same CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC as a photocatalyst support. As a result, it was verified that CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC manifested a remarkable sterilization effect under irradiation of visible light compared with ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC, which did not show an obvious sterilization capacity in the same lighting conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Coal tar pitch was obtained from Ansteel Group Corporation (Anshan, China). Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) was purchased from Aladdin Industrial Corporation (Shanghai, China). Cu(NO3)2·3H2O (CAS Number C140879) and ZrOCl2·8H2O (CAS Number Z104931) compounds were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) Nutrient agar was purchased from Hangzhou Baisi biotech Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou, China).

2.2. Characterization

The measurements of X-ray diffraction (XRD) used the X’pert Powder instrument from PANalytical, The Netherlands. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were carried out using a K-Alpha instrument from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA. Xenon lamp (CEL-HXF300-T3) was purchased from Beijing Zhong Jiao Jin Yuan Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Nitrogen adsorption and desorption isotherms were measured with a Quadrasorb autosorb-iQ surface analyzer, which was purchased from Quantachrome Instruments, Boynton Beach, FL, USA [24]. Specific surface areas were determined in detail, according to the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method. The pore size distribution was assessed with the DFT model for slit pores [25,26]. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) morphologies were evaluated with a microscope from Carl Zeiss AG, Jena, Germany. A high-pressure steam sterilizer (LDZX-50KBS) made by Shanghai Shenan medical instrument factory (Shanghai, China) was also used. An electro-heating standing-temperature cultivator was purchased from Shanghai Jinghong Laboratory Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

2.3. Preparation of ZrO2/CB/Coal-Tar-Pitch-SAC

In accordance with our previous studies, the CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC was prepared firstly [10]. Thereafter, ZrOCl2·8H2O (3 g) and anhydrous alcohol (30 mL) were added to a beaker. After the obtained mixture had been stirred for 20 min at room temperature, the deionized water (30 mL) was added. The obtained mixture was stirred until the ZrOCl2·8H2O dissolved completely. Furthermore, the temperature of the obtained mixture was increased to 70 °C, and this mixture was stirred for 40 min.
The CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC (1.0 g) and mixture precursor solution containing ZrOCl2 (3 mL) were added to a porcelain boat, which was then placed in a vacuum drying oven and dried for 4 h. The same porcelain boat was placed in the tube furnace and treated at 500 °C for 4 h. As a result, the ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC was successfully fabricated (Figure 1).

2.4. Preparation of CuO/ZrO2/CB/Coal-Tar-Pitch-SAC

The ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC (1.3 g) was placed in three porcelain boats, and 0.5 M Cu(NO3)2·3H2O solutions (0.75, 3.77 and 7.54 mL) were each dropped in these three porcelain boats. After these porcelain boats had been placed in the vacuum drying oven and dried for 4 h, they were placed in a tube furnace and treated at 300 °C for 2 h. According to the weight ratios (CuO:ZrO2:CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC = 0.03:0.3:1, 0.15:0.3:1 and 0.3:0.3:1), the prepared CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials were named as 0.03-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC, 0.15-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC and 0.3-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC.

2.5. Sterilizing Tests of CuO/ZrO2/CB/Coal-Tar-Pitch-SAC

The sterilization evaluations were performed using the spread plate method [27]. All experiment appliances were firstly used to perform sterilization treatments. The xenon lamp as a visible light source was used to conduct the sterilization of CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials. The CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC (0.1 g) was placed in a beaker (50 mL) containing koi fish feeding water (20 mL). Sterilization of CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC was performed for 1 h under irradiation of the xenon lamp. The sterilization efficiency was evaluated with the spread plate method.

3. Results and Discussion

The structures of CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC were primarily investigated by XRD measurements (Figure 2). In accordance with standards of CuO (ICOD 00-041-0254) and ZrO2 (ICOD 00-049-1642), it was found that CuO, ZrO2 and CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials were synthesized successfully. Additionally, it was observed that peak intensities of CuO remarkably increased with the amount of CuO.
The distributions of metal oxides on the surface were investigated by SEM measurements. Figure 3a shows that 0.03-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC possessed an average diameter of around 200 μm. Figure 3b reveals that the agglomeration phenomenon of ZrO2 coated on the surface of CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC was scarcely noticeable. In contrast, the CuO was distinctly and uniformly covered on the surface of CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC (Figure 3c).
The BET method was used to investigate the pore structures and specific surface areas of CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC, ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC and CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials (Figure 4). It was observed that CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC manifested the largest specific surface area (1321.8 m2/g) and total pore volume (0.52 cm3/g) compared to ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC and CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials (Figure 3e, Table 1). With ZrO2 and CuO covering the surface of CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC, the specific surface area and total pore volume showed obviously diminished tendencies, attributed to the dispersal of ZrO2 and CuO on the CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials (Figure 3a–d).
The formation of a heterojunction among the ZrO2 and CuO on the surface of CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC was also verified by the XPS measurements. With increased CuO, the binding energy of 3d5/2 of ZrO2 became stronger; however, the binding energy of 2p3/2 of CuO became slightly smaller (Figure 5). These conversions of binding energies strongly supported the authentic formation of the heterojunction among the ZrO2 and CuO compounds on the surface of CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials [27].
Furthermore, UV–Vis diffuse reflection spectroscopy (DRS) measurements were carried out to investigate the improvement of photosensitivity of CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC powders with a heterojunction among the ZrO2 and CuO. As shown in Figure 6, it is naturally considered that the strong absorptive intensity around 270 nm was attributed to the ZrO2 on the surface of ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC [28]. Nevertheless, the ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials showed weak photosensitivity at an irradiation range of 400 to 800 nm. On the contrary, the CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials displayed relatively stronger absorptive intensity at the irradiation range of 400 to 800 nm, indicating that constructing the heterojunctions among the ZrO2 and CuO compounds on the surface of CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials is an efficacious method to enhance photosensitive ability under visible light.
Interestingly, it is obvious that 0.03-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC showed stronger photosensitivity than 0.15-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC at irradiation wavelengths of 400–800 nm (Figure 6). The carrier principle of transfer was used to fully explore the aforementioned phenomenon. The report by Lou et al. may explain these findings [29]. Namely, when the CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC powders were irradiated by visible light, many produced carriers on the CuO were able to be moved onto the surface of ZrO2 compounds. Generally, with increased CuO, the produced number of carriers should be increased remarkably. However, the problem of electron-hole recombination diminishes the number of produced carriers. Consequently, the photosensitivity of 0.03-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC is stronger than that of 0.15-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC.
On the other hand, many CuO compounds on the surface of 0.3-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC naturally enhanced the photosensitive ability because CuO possesses a narrow valance band. According to the Kubelka–Munk energy curve, the band gap energy (Eg) of different materials is described in Figure 7. It is observed that 0.3-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC possessed smaller Eg than other materials, which was attributed to 0.3-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC possessing more CuO than that in other materials [19].
The sterilization effects of CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials are illustrated in Figure 8. As shown in Figure 8b, the ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC did not show an obvious sterilization effect in visible light. On the other hand, the CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials showed obvious sterilization capacity in the same light conditions (Figure 8c–e). The 0.03-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC exhibited an especially strong sterilization effect (Figure 8c).
In addition, the spread plate method was used to accurately evaluate the sterilization efficiency. As a result, it was also observed that the 0.03-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC showed a significantly improved sterilization efficiency (94%) compared to 0.15-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC (76%) and 0.3-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC (84%). Considering the fact that 0.03-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC possesses a larger specific surface area than other materials, the cooperative effects of formation of heterojunctions and large specific surface areas are the pivotal factors in improving the visible light sterilization capacity of CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials (Figure 9).

4. Conclusions

CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC photocatalysts were successfully prepared by coating ZrO2 and CuO on the surface of CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC. It was found that the sterilization capacity of CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC was remarkably improved compared with the ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC. In particular, 0.03-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC exhibits excellent sterilization efficiency at 94%, which is higher than other materials. The formation of a heterojunction among the CuO and ZrO2 compounds facilitates the movement of carriers, which leads to CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC possessing the improved photosensitivity in visible light. Furthermore, the cooperative effects of formation of heterojunctions and large specific surface areas are the important factors in improving the visible light sterilization capacity of CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials. Our studies are able to provide a reference for fabrication of photocatalysts with visible light sterilization characteristics by constructing the heterojunction among the metal oxides on the surface of SAC materials. To realize the actual application of CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC, scale-up experiments of sterilization of aquaculture water will be performed in future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.X. and W.Z.; methodology, K.W. and G.X.; validation, K.W., G.X. and B.H.; formal analysis, Z.X., L.L. and W.Z.; investigation, Z.X. and B.H.; resources, H.G. and B.A.; data curation, Z.X. and K.W.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.X.; writing—review and editing, W.Z.; supervision, D.J. and M.C.; project administration, B.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We are grateful for the support of the University of Science and Technology Liaoning (601009816-39 and 2017RC03). This work obtained support from the Liaoning Province Education Department of China (Grant No. 601009887-16). This work is partly supported by the project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51672117 and 51672118). This study is supported by the Postdoctoral Foundation Project of Shenzhen Polytechnic (6020330007K).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jia, Q.; Song, Q.; Li, P.; Huang, W. Rejuvenated photodynamic therapy for bacterial infections. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2019, 8, 1900608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jia, R.; Tian, W.; Bai, H.; Zhang, J.; Wang, S.; Zhang, J. Sunlightdriven wearable and robust antibacterial coatings with water-soluble cellulose-based photosensitizers. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2019, 8, 1801591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Qi, K.; Cheng, B.; Yu, J.; Ho, W. Review on the improvement of the photocatalytic and antibacterial activities of ZnO. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 727, 792–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lee, M.M.S.; Xu, W.; Zheng, L.; Yu, B.; Leung, A.C.S.; Kwok, R.T.K.; Lam, J.W.Y.; Xu, F.J.; Wang, D.; Tang, B.Z. Ultrafast discrimination of Gram-positive bacteria and highly efficient photodynamic antibacterial therapy using near-infrared photosensitizer with aggregation-induced emission characteristics. Biomaterials 2020, 230, 119582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ahmed, B.; Ojha, A.K.; Singh, A.; Hirsch, F.; Fischer, I.; Patrice, D.; Materny, A. Well-controlled in-situ growth of 2D WO3 rectangular sheets on reduced graphene oxide with strong photocatalytic and antibacterial properties. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 347, 266–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kim, B.C.; Jeong, E.; Kim, E.; Hong, S.W. Bio-organic-inorganic hybrid photocatalyst, TiO2 and glucose oxidase composite for enhancing antibacterial performance in aqueous environments. Appl. Catal. 2019, 242, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 37–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Y.; Zhao, D. On the controllable soft-templating approach to mesoporous silicates. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2821–2831. [Google Scholar]
  9. Yamamoto, O.; Sawai, J.; Sasamoto, T. Activated carbon sphere with antibacterial characteristics. Mater. Trans. 2005, 43, 1069–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Shen, L.Z.; Xu, G.Y.; Han, B.B.; Kato, S.K.; Dai, Y.Y.; Ge, H.; Wang, K.; Sun, F.; Zhou, W.M. Study on fabrication and sterilization characteristics of novel composite spherical activated carbon (TiO2/CB/SAC). J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 2020, 53, 526–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hirvonen, A.; Nowak, R.; Yamamoto, Y.; Sekino, T.; Niihara, K. Fabrication, structure, mechanical and thermal properties of zirconia-based ceramic nanocomposites. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2006, 26, 1497–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chandra, N.; Singh, D.K.; Sharma, M.; Upadhyay, R.K.; Amritphale, S.S.; Sanghi, S.K. Synthesis and characterization of nano-sized zirconia powder synthesized by single emulsion-assisted direct precipitation. J. Colloid. Interf. Sci. 2010, 342, 327–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kaviyarasu, K.; Kotsedi, L.; Simo, A.; Fuku, X.; Mola, G.T.; Kennedy, J.; Maaza, M. Photocatalytic activity of ZrO2 doped lead dioxide nanocomposites: Investigation of structural and optical microscopy of RhB organic dye. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 421, 234–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Qin, Y.M.; Ding, Z.Y.; Guo, W.W.; Guo, X.L.; Hou, C.; Jiang, B.P.; Liu, C.G.; Shen, X.C. A full solar light spectrum responsive B@ZrO2–OV photocatalyst: A synergistic strategy for visible-to-NIR photon harvesting. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 13039–13047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fechete, I.; Ye, W.; Védrine, J.C. The past, present and future of heterogeneous catalysis. Catal. Today 2012, 189, 2–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yu, S.; Liu, J.; Yan, Z.; Richard, D.W.; Yan, X.L. Effect of synthesis method on the nanostructure and solar-driven photocatalytic properties of TiO2-CuS composites. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 1347–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, J.X.; Guan, R.Q.; Zhang, J.K.; Zhao, Z.; Zhai, H.J.; Sun, D.W.; Qi, Y.F. Preparation and photocatalytic performance of dumbbell Ag2CO3−ZnO heterojunctions. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 570–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Li, J.Q.; Cui, M.M.; Guo, Z.; Liu, Z.X.; Zhu, Z.F. Synthesis of dumbbell-like CuO–BiVO4 heterogeneous nanostructures with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity. Mater. Lett. 2014, 130, 36–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, J.; Li, L.; Xiao, Z.Y.; Liu, D.; Wang, S.; Zhang, J.J.; Hao, Y.T.; Zhang, W.Z. Hollow sphere TiO2–ZrO2 prepared by self-assembly with polystyrene colloidal template for both photocatalytic degradation and H2 evolution from water splitting. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 2037–2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ayodeji, P.A.; Reyes-Lopéz, S.Y. ZrO2−ZnO nanoparticles as antibacterial agents. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 19216–19224. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kargar, A.; Jing, Y.; Kim, S.J.; Riley, C.T.; Pan, X.Q.; Wang, D. ZnO/CuOheterojunction branched nanowires for photoelectrochemical hydrogen generation. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 11112–11120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhu, L.; Li, H.; Liu, Z.; Xia, P.; Xie, Y.; Xiong, D. Synthesis of 0D/3D CuO/ZnOheterojunction with enhanced photocatalytic activity. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2018, 122, 9531–9539. [Google Scholar]
  23. Raees, A.; Jamal, M.A.; Ahmed, I.; Silanpaa, M.; Algarni, T.S. Synthesis and characterization of CeO2/CuOnanocomposites for photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue in visible light. Coatings 2021, 11, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, Z.L.; Yang, Z.; Yang, H. Theoretical and practical discussion of measurement accuracy for physisorption with micro- and mesoporous materials. Chin. J. Catal. 2013, 34, 1797–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hu, S.X.; Hsieh, Y.L. Lignin derived activated carbon particulates as an electric supercapacitor: Carbonization and activatioon porous structures and microstructures. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 30459–30468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Kupgan, G.; Liyana-Arachchi, T.P.; Colina, C.M. NLDFT Pore Size Distribution in Amorphous Microporous Materials. Langmuir 2017, 33, 11138–11145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Gong, J.; Zhao, Z.J.; Wang, Z.; Luo, R.; Wang, Y. Strong electronic oxidesupport interaction over In2O3/ZrO2 for highly selective CO2 hydrogenation to methanol. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 19523–19531. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nova, C.V.; Reis, K.A.; Pinheiro, A.L.; Dalmaschio, C.J.; Chiquito, A.J.; Teodoro, M.D.; Rodrigues, A.D. Synthesis, characterization, photocatalytic, and antimicrobial activity of ZrO2 nanoparticles and Ag@ZrO2nanocomposite prepared by the advanced oxidative process/hydrothermal route. J. Sol. Gel. Sci. Technol. 2021, 98, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lou, X.; Shang, J.; Liang, W.; Feng, H.; Hao, W.; Wang, T.; Du, Y. Enhanced photocatalytic activity of Bi24O31Br10: Constructing heterojunction with BiOI. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2017, 33, 281–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Images of fabrication process of CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials.
Figure 1. Images of fabrication process of CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials.
Coatings 11 00816 g001
Figure 2. XRD results of CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials (ac), ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC; (d), ZrO2; (e), CuO; (f), standard of ICOD 00-049-1642 of ZrO2; (g) and standard of ICOD 00-041-0254 of CuO (h).
Figure 2. XRD results of CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials (ac), ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC; (d), ZrO2; (e), CuO; (f), standard of ICOD 00-049-1642 of ZrO2; (g) and standard of ICOD 00-041-0254 of CuO (h).
Coatings 11 00816 g002
Figure 3. SEM (a) and SEM-EDS (bd) images of 0.03-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC material. EDS mapping of (b) Zr, (c) Cu and (d) O.
Figure 3. SEM (a) and SEM-EDS (bd) images of 0.03-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC material. EDS mapping of (b) Zr, (c) Cu and (d) O.
Coatings 11 00816 g003
Figure 4. Pore size distribution curves of CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC (e), ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC (d) and CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials (ac).
Figure 4. Pore size distribution curves of CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC (e), ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC (d) and CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials (ac).
Coatings 11 00816 g004
Figure 5. XPS results of Cu 2p3/2 (a) and Zr 3d5/2 (b) in CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC composite materials.
Figure 5. XPS results of Cu 2p3/2 (a) and Zr 3d5/2 (b) in CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC composite materials.
Coatings 11 00816 g005
Figure 6. UV–Vis diffuse reflection spectroscopy (DRS) results of ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC and CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC powders.
Figure 6. UV–Vis diffuse reflection spectroscopy (DRS) results of ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC and CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC powders.
Coatings 11 00816 g006
Figure 7. Plot of transformed Kubelka–Munk function versus the band gap (eV) of different samples.
Figure 7. Plot of transformed Kubelka–Munk function versus the band gap (eV) of different samples.
Coatings 11 00816 g007
Figure 8. Evaluation of bactericidal effects. (a) Culturing result of the koi fish feeding water; (b) bactericidal effect of ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC in irradiation of visible light; (c) bactericidal effect of 0.03-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC in visible light; (d) result of the water treated with the 0.15-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC; (e) result of the water treated with the 0.3-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC in visible light.
Figure 8. Evaluation of bactericidal effects. (a) Culturing result of the koi fish feeding water; (b) bactericidal effect of ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC in irradiation of visible light; (c) bactericidal effect of 0.03-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC in visible light; (d) result of the water treated with the 0.15-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC; (e) result of the water treated with the 0.3-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC in visible light.
Coatings 11 00816 g008
Figure 9. The sterilization effects of ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC and CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials.
Figure 9. The sterilization effects of ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC and CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials.
Coatings 11 00816 g009
Table 1. Characteristic parameters of structures and specific surface areas of CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC, ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC and CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials. SBET = total BET surface area; Vtotal = total pore volume.
Table 1. Characteristic parameters of structures and specific surface areas of CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC, ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC and CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC materials. SBET = total BET surface area; Vtotal = total pore volume.
SamplesSBET (m2·g−1)Vtotal (cm3·g−1)
CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC1321.80.52
ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC631.60.49
0.03-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC330.80.24
0.15-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC210.60.19
0.3-CuO/ZrO2/CB/coal-tar-pitch-SAC131.90.17
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, Z.; Xu, G.; Han, B.; Wang, K.; Ge, H.; An, B.; Ju, D.; Chai, M.; Li, L.; Zhou, W. Fabrication and Sterilization Characteristics of Visible Light Photocatalyst of CuO/ZrO2/CB/Coal-Tar-Pitch-SAC. Coatings 2021, 11, 816. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11070816

AMA Style

Xu Z, Xu G, Han B, Wang K, Ge H, An B, Ju D, Chai M, Li L, Zhou W. Fabrication and Sterilization Characteristics of Visible Light Photocatalyst of CuO/ZrO2/CB/Coal-Tar-Pitch-SAC. Coatings. 2021; 11(7):816. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11070816

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Ziang, Guiying Xu, Beibei Han, Kun Wang, Hui Ge, Baigang An, Dongying Ju, Maorong Chai, Lixiang Li, and Weimin Zhou. 2021. "Fabrication and Sterilization Characteristics of Visible Light Photocatalyst of CuO/ZrO2/CB/Coal-Tar-Pitch-SAC" Coatings 11, no. 7: 816. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11070816

APA Style

Xu, Z., Xu, G., Han, B., Wang, K., Ge, H., An, B., Ju, D., Chai, M., Li, L., & Zhou, W. (2021). Fabrication and Sterilization Characteristics of Visible Light Photocatalyst of CuO/ZrO2/CB/Coal-Tar-Pitch-SAC. Coatings, 11(7), 816. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11070816

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop