3.1. Water Absorption of Recycled Coarse Aggregate
In order to obtain common rules for water absorption of recycled coarse aggregate, two different origin recycled coarse aggregates are prepared. The water absorption of these two kinds of recycled coarse aggregate from 0 min to 60 min are displayed in
Figure 3.
From
Figure 3a, it can be seen that the curve tend of the two kinds of recycled coarse aggregates are almost the same as each other. During the first 10 min, water absorption is quick. After 10 min, the rate of the water absorption becomes smooth. For different recycled coarse aggregate, about 90% of water has been absorbed in the first 10 min. From
Figure 3, it can also be seen that different origin recycled coarse aggregate may have different water absorption characteristics. The water absorption of the aggregate with (5–10) mm particle size is absolutely more than the one with (10–20) mm particle size. This may be because the content of mortar sticking on or mixing in the (5–10) mm particles is more than that sticking on the (10–20) mm aggregate. The mortar has stronger water absorption ability than the natural aggregate. The more content of mortar in the aggregate, the stronger water absorption ability it will have. From
Figure 3b, it can be seen that the rule is the same as the 60th minute. No matter 1# or 2#, the water absorption of the (5–10) mm aggregate is larger than that of the (10–20) mm ones. The water absorption of 2# aggregate with (5–10) mm particle size is 6.83% which is a little bigger than the one of 1# aggregate which is 6.11. The opposite phenomenon, that 1# water absorption is a little bigger than 2# water absorption, appears with the (10–20) mm particles. Exploring the reason, it may be due to the different origin of the aggregates. The 1# comes from the slab of the bridge. The 2# comes from the pavement. In China, there is a common rule that the concrete grade of bridge slab is larger than that of the pavement. In general, the concrete grade range of the bridge slab can be C45-C50 but the one of pavement can be C25-C30. The number of pores is the main reason for the water absorption in the concrete. So, the water absorption of 2# with (10–20) mm particle size is larger than the one of 1#. Why does the water absorption in (5–10) mm have the opposite phenomenon? This may be because the content of mortar in 1# is more than that in 2#. Due to the mechanical disruption during production process, the mortar in the concrete is broken into small particles with (5–10) mm but not (10–20) mm. The bridge slab with higher strength, smaller water cement ratio and more cement content has more mortar than the concrete pavement with lower strength, higher water cement ratio and low cement content.
3.2. Water Absorption of Modified Recycled Coarse Aggregate
To find effective methods of modified recycled coarse aggregate so that reduce the water absorption, four kinds of materials are selected to mix them with water into slurry for wrapping the recycled coarse aggregate. Make the 1# aggregate as a representative. The water absorption of modified recycled coarse aggregates is displayed in
Figure 4.
First, from
Figure 4, after wrapping the slurry shell, no matter the (5–10) mm recycled coarse aggregate or the (10–20) mm ones, the (0–10) min water absorption of the recycled coarse aggregate is significantly reduced. Noteworthy, the SiH-agent can slow down the first 10 min water absorption rate of the recycled coarse aggregate and can prolong the sum of the first 10 min water absorption to 20 min. However, it can increase the sum water absorption at last. So, it may not be a good modified material. C, Si, SiN can change the water absorption curve and reduce the sum water absorption absolutely. However, they also cannot decrease the first 10 min water absorption rate. SiN material is the best one for reducing the water absorption compared to C and Si.
From
Figure 4a, for the modified recycled coarse aggregate with (5–10) mm particle size, the water absorption is ordered as SiN-500 nm > SiN-20 nm > Si-150 nm > Si-300 nm > C. Comparing to the unmodified recycled coarse aggregate, by the end of 60 min, the sum water absorption can be decreased to 1.93%, 2.47%, 2.64%, 3.70% and 4.16%. The decreasing amplitude reached 66.1%, 56.6%, 53.7%, 35.0% and 27.0%, respectively. From
Figure 4b, for the modified recycled coarse aggregate with (10–20) mm particle size, the water absorption is ordered as SiN-500 nm > SiN-20 nm > C > Si-300 nm > Si-150 nm. The 60 min sum water absorption can be decreased to 2.43%, 2.54%, 3.08%, 3.19% and 3.65%. The decreasing amplitude reached 50.5%, 48.3%, 37.3%, 35.0% and 25.8%, respectively. From the date above, it can be seen that the same modified material has different effects on the different recycled coarse aggregate. Using the same modified material, the water absorption reducing amplitude of the (5–10) mm particle size recycled coarse aggregate is more than the one with (10–20) mm particle size.
To analyze the reason for the different modified effects from C, Si, SiN materials, the particle size and the chemical properties may be the main two reasons. As we all know, there are a lot of pores in recycled coarse aggregate due to the existence of the sticking mortar. According to the previous study, the pore diameter of the mortar ranges from nanometer size to millimeter size [
44]. However, the pore which can determine the water absorbing ability of the mortar is the capillary pore. The proportion of the capillary pore is about 0–40% in cement-based mortars, and its size is among (100–1000) nm [
45]. In order to decrease the water absorption of the recycled coarse aggregate, the particle size which is used for blocking the capillary pore has to be smaller than 50 μm. So, the materials selected in the experiment are all suitable. Ordinarily, the smaller the particle is, the easier it can permeate into and block the pores in mortar. From
Figure 4, this regularity is not remarkable. The water absorption of the recycled coarse aggregate modified with SiN-500 nm is less than the one modified with SiN-20 nm. Based on
Figure 4b, this regularity also happens. The water absorption of the recycled coarse aggregate modified with Si-300 nm is less than the one modified with Si-150 nm. So, there may be other reasons leading to this result that need to be studied, such as detecting the modified aggregate pore distribution to see the amount of the rest capillary or observing the interspace of the capillary pore to see how much the interspace of the pore is occupied by the modified particle. Maybe these methods can explain the phenomenon that the smaller particle has weaker blocking ability.
The chemical properties of these particles can also have an effect on the water absorption of the recycled coarse aggregate. The wrapping materials can be separated into three kinds. One is pure sluggish material such as the silicon nitride. The second is half activity material such as the silica fume. The third one is activity material such as cement. The sluggishness material can not react with the water. It is only used as a filling material to fill the capillary pore of the mortar sticking on the recycled coarse aggregate. The half activity material can react with the water, not immediately, but sometime later. For example, the silica fume, if you add it to the cement base slurry, the silica fume can react with water slowly after the 28-d curing period. So, during the steeping process of recycled coarse aggregate in the slurry, the silica fume can absorb more water than the sluggish material. The water of the recycled coarse aggregate modified with silica fume slurry is composed of two parts, one part is from the pores which are not blocked by the silica fume slurry and the other part is from the reacting between the silica fume and the water. The active material can react with water almost immediately as long as it comes across the water. For example, the cement, the cement-based slurry will be wrapped on the recycled coarse aggregate and then dried. When testing the water absorption of the modified recycled coarse aggregate, the water that the aggregate absorbed can also be separated into two parts similar to the silica fume slurry. Because the water that the cement hydrate needs is much more than the silica fume hydrate, the water absorption of the recycled coarse aggregate modified by the cement slurry will be more than the ones modified by the silica fume slurry.
What is more, the dry cement slurry shell on the recycled coarse aggregate will continue to hydrate when it comes across the water. So, after 60 min, the cement will continue absorbing water to support the cement hydrate. The 24 h water absorption has been tested and displayed in
Figure 5 to verify the final water absorption situation.
From
Figure 5, it can be seen that almost every material can reduce the 24 h water absorption of the recycled coarse aggregate excluding the cement. Obviously, the water absorption of the aggregate modified by cement slurry is more than other materials and even more than the original recycled aggregate. This special phenomenon is due to the continuous cement hydrate reaction. For the (5–10) mm recycled coarse aggregate, the 24 h water absorption is ordered as C > None > SiH-agent > Si-300 nm > SiN-20 nm > Si-150 nm > SiN-500 nm. The water absorption is separately listed as 8.40%, 6.11%, 4.52%, 3.97%, 2.84%, 2.78%, 1.95%. The best modified material is SiN-500 nm, and it can reduce the water absorption of the recycled coarse aggregate by more than 60%. However, the price of the silicon nitride is much higher than the silica fume. The Si-150 nm is the second most excellent material. It can reduce the water absorption of the recycled coarse aggregate from 6.11% to 2.78%. The reduction in amplitude is about 54.5%. A little less than the SiN-500 nm. However, the price of the Si-150 nm is much less than the SiN-500 nm. If there is a large amount of the recycled coarse aggregate with (5–10) mm particle size, the Si-150 nm may be the best cost performance ratio material used for modifying these recycled coarse aggregate. For the (10–20) mm recycled coarse aggregate, the 24 h water absorption is ordered as C > None > Si-150 nm > Si-300 nm > SiH-agent > SiN-500 nm > SiN-20 nm. The water absorption is listed separately as 6.29%, 5.34%, 3.95%, 3.47%, 3.46%, 2.72%, 2.70%. For the (10–20) mm recycled coarse aggregate, the best modified material is SiN-20 nm and it can reduce the water absorption of the recycled coarse aggregate about 50%. Although the SiN material is better than other materials, the high price may limit its use for engineering.
From
Section 3.1 and
Section 3.2, no matter the original recycled coarse aggregate or the modified ones, the water absorption of the recycled coarse aggregate is still higher than the natural coarse aggregate with water absorption under 2% according to the Chinese standard GB/T 14685-2011.
3.3. Concrete Performance Made by Modified Recycled Coarse Aggregate
Comparing the different effects on the concrete coming from the aggregates with different modified methods and different dry and wet conditions, the cement, silica fume with particle size 150 nm and the silicon nitride with 20 nm are selected. The dry modified recycled coarse aggregates are prepared by the method of
Section 2.2.2. Number them as C-D, Si-150 nm-D and SiN-20 nm-D. The wet ones are also prepared following the
Section 2.2.2 but without dry steps. Number them as C-W, Si-150 nm-W and SiN-20 nm-W. Number the unmodified recycled coarse aggregate with None. The slump, compressive strength, splitting strength have been tested. The results are displayed in
Figure 6,
Figure 7 and
Figure 8. The mix proportion and the percentage of the recycled coarse aggregate are the same among these concretes. The details are shown in
Table 9. The raw materials are all the same. The only difference is the kind of modified materials.
Figure 6 shows the slump change of the concretes with different modified materials and different dry or wet conditions among 0–15 min. First, from
Figure 6, it can be seen that the slump will decrease with the time flow. However, the decreasing amplitude is different. The most important thing is that the wet modified recycled coarse aggregate is better than the dry ones. Not only is the initial slump of the concrete with the wet modified recycled coarse aggregate more than that of the concrete with the dry ones, but also the whole slump curve of the concrete with the wet modified recycled coarse aggregate is all on the top of the dry ones. From
Figure 6, the initial slump can be ordered as SiN-20 nm-W (180 mm) = Si-150 nm-W = C-W > SiN-20 nm-D (175 mm) > Si-150 nm-D (170 mm) = C-D > None (165 mm). The 15th min slump can be ordered as SiN-20 nm-W (165 mm) > Si-150 nm-W (160 mm) = C-W > SiN-20 nm-D (150 mm) > Si-150 nm-D (145 mm) > C-D (135 mm) > None (120 mm). Using the initial slump minus the 15th min slump, the slump decreasing amplitude of the concrete with different modified materials between 0 min to 15 min is plot in
Figure 7.
From
Figure 7, the slump decreasing amplitude is ordered as SiN-20 nm-W (15 mm) > Si-150 nm-W (20 mm) = C-W > SiN-20 nm-D (25 mm) = Si-150 nm-D > C-D (35 mm) > None (45 mm). Actually, the less of the decreasing amplitude of the concrete is, the better of the concrete construction performance is. So, for keeping the slump of the concrete, the wet modified recycled coarse aggregate may be better than the dry ones. Considering the cost performance ratio, the cement is a more proper material than the silica fume and silicon nitride. So, during the real construction, using the cement slurry as the modified materials is a good selection.
The compressive strength and splitting strength of the concrete made by different modified materials are shown in
Figure 8.
From
Figure 8, the compressive strength of the concrete with different modified recycled coarse aggregate is plot on left axis and the splitting tensile strength is plot on the right one. Compared to the None group, the compressive strength and splitting tensile strength of all other groups are all increased. This phenomenon proves that the modified recycled coarse aggregate can enhance the mechanical property of the concrete.
From
Figure 8, the compressive strength can be ordered as C-W > SiN-20 nm-D > SiN-20 nm-W > Si-150 nm-D > C-D > Si-150 nm-W. The increasing amplitude is listed separately as 20.12%, 15.60%, 15.16%, 13.48%, 11.08%, 7.45%. Unlike the slump rules, the concrete with wet modified recycled coarse aggregate is not better than the dry ones. The compressive strength of the concrete with SiN-20 nm-D modified the aggregate is more than the one with the SiN-20 nm-W modified the aggregate. The same situation also happens on the Silica fume and Cement. This phenomenon may be due to the aggregate with dry slurry shell wrapped can absorb more water than the aggregate with wet slurry on them. So, the water amount may decrease indirectly, and the water cement ratio is decreased at the same time. The smaller water cement ratio can lead to more compressive strength. The most important thing, from
Figure 8, it also can be seen that the C-W group is the best one among these groups. From
Figure 8, the splitting tensile strength can be ordered as C-W > C-D > SiN-20 nm-D > Si-150 nm-W > Si-150 nm-D > SiN-20 nm-W. The increasing amplitude is listed separately as 20.83%, 16.20%, 12.86%, 9.30%, 7.72%, 1.36%. So, the C-W is also the best group for the tensile strength. From the slump and mechanical performance analysis above, it can be seen that the C-W is definitely a good method for modifying the recycled coarse aggregate. Not only does it have good slump maintain performance, good mechanical performance, but also it is cheaper than the silica fume and silicon nitride.
3.4. The Effect of the Mixing Style of the Aggregate with Cement Slurry Wrapped
From the above study results, the C-W is a good way to modify the recycled coarse aggregate. However, considering the cost and convenience, setting a slurry pool on the construction site for pre-absorb slurry is not a high performance-cost-ratio thing. So, the study tries to find a new convenient way to wrap the recycled coarse aggregate with cement slurry.
Actually, the mechanism of modified recycled coarse aggregate has a lower water absorption rate, mainly due to the cement slurry blocking the pore of the mortar on the recycled aggregate. The slump of the concrete with recycled coarse aggregate decreased mainly due to the pores in the mortar on the aggregate. So, if there is enough cement slurry that the recycled coarse aggregate can absorb sufficiently, the recycled concrete slump decreasing can be resolved. Based on this method, this study decided to mix enough cement slurry into the concrete during the mixing process in order to supply enough cement slurry for the un-wrapped recycled coarse aggregate.
The slump, mechanical performance of the concrete has been tested. The results are displayed in
Figure 9 and
Figure 10.
From
Figure 9, the slump of C-W group is more than the C-T group. For the initial slump of concrete, the C-W group which is 180 mm is also more than the C-T group which is 170 mm. For the slump decreasing amplitude, the C-W group which is 20 mm is less than the C-T group which is 25 mm. So, from the aspect of slump, the C-W is better than the C-T. This may be due to the C-W group aggregate being wrapped with cement slurry before being put into the blender. That means the pores of the mortar on the recycled coarse aggregate have been blocked in advance. So, the water absorption of the recycled coarse aggregate has been decreased before being put into the blender. During the mixing process in the blender, the wrapped recycled coarse aggregate has lower water absorption performance than the aggregate of the C-T group which has not been treated in advance. Meanwhile, the good thing is that the slump and the slump decreasing amplitude of concrete with C-T group aggregate are all still satisfied the requirement of the concrete construction.
From
Figure 10, it can be seen that the compressive strength of C-W group which is 45.2 MPa is a little less than that of the C-T group which is 47.39 MPa. The splitting tensile strength shows the same rule as the compressive strength. So, the mechanical performance of concrete has different rules relating to the slump of concrete. The reason may be the extra cement slurry which is pre-mixing in the blender during the mixing process. The extra cement slurry takes more cement into the mixture. The more cement content the concrete has, the better compressive strength it will have.
From the slump and mechanical performance of the concrete, it can be seen that the C-T group can also satisfy the construction need as well as the C-W group. This result went quite well. That means there is no need to set up a slurry pool on a construction site. Good performance recycled concrete can be obtained by adding extra cement slurry directly.