Next Article in Journal
Dynamic Strain Response of Hot-Recycled Asphalt Pavement under Dual-Axle Accelerated Loading Conditions
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Aesthetic Archwire Coatings on Bacterial Adhesion
Previous Article in Journal
Current Perspective on the Study of Liquid–Fluid Interfaces: From Fundamentals to Innovative Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Artificial Aging on Mechanical Properties of Six Resin Composite Blocks for CAD/CAM Application
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Bioactive Coatings in Dentistry—What Is the Future?

1
Department of Integrated Dentistry, Wroclaw Medical University, Krakowska 26, 50-425 Wroclaw, Poland
2
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Boston University, Boston, MA 02118, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2022, 12(6), 842; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12060842
Submission received: 8 June 2022 / Accepted: 13 June 2022 / Published: 16 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Coatings on Elements Used in the Oral Cavity Environment)
Bioactive coatings are widely used and understood materials in engineering. The use of coatings modifying the properties of various elements to change their interactions with living matter can be found in agriculture [1], bioengineering [2], and medicine [3]. Bioactive coatings can prevent the adverse effects of microbes [1,4], create better conditions for cell culture [2], and support bone cell growth or angiogenesis (for example, in a transplant recipient).
The effect of such an action may be an increase in yields, creating new possibilities in the field of cell engineering [2], such as increasing the likelihood of receiving a transplant and reducing the likelihood of postoperative complications [1,2,3,4,5,6].
The human oral environment poses major challenges for clinicians and manufacturers of dental materials in terms of mechanical properties and biocompatibility. It is characterized by a wide range of temperature and pH variability, the presence of a large number of microorganisms, and the possibility of the interaction of various chemical substances contained in food and oral hygiene products [7]. An additional problem that should be considered is the need to maintain appropriate aesthetics—as in the case of prosthetic restorations and orthodontic appliances.
Due to such high environmental requirements, research on the surface properties of the materials used mainly in implant surgery or orthodontics has long been at the center of interest for many researchers and producers of these materials. This has resulted in many original studies and systematic reviews summarizing the achievements in this field [8,9,10].
An increasingly strengthening cooperation between researchers in the field of dentistry, materials engineering, bioengineering, chemistry, microbiology, immunology, and the dentists themselves continues to result in rapid developments in the field of improving the surface properties of various types of elements used in the oral cavity environment.
In dental surgery, research in the field of surface modification towards its bioactive effect is particularly strong. The change in the properties of the implant surface may take place as a result of physical, chemical, or biological processes [11].
Research on modification via chemical interactions was particularly intense in the second decade of the 20th century and many of the researchers have provided very promising results [12,13,14]. This research consisted mainly of the application of hydroxyapatite, magnesium compounds, silver, calcium phosphates, sol-gel coatings, fluorine, and anodic oxidation.
Changes made by physical methods can modify the structure on the micro and nano scale.
Modifications to the surface of implants smaller than 1 μm seem to be particularly promising, as they may have a positive effect on osseointegration and reduce the adhesion of bacterial biofilm. In order to achieve these effects, researchers are trying to use laser ablation and cover the surface of implants with nanocomposites [15,16,17,18,19]. Many of these experiments yield positive results in in vitro and animal studies, but in this area, there are still opportunities for research investigating both the direct mechanisms of these interactions and the applicability of some of these methods to humans.
Biological methods include covering the implant surface with various factors regulating bone metabolism and possessing antibacterial properties. They have been the focus of researchers in recent years due to the very promising results related to the promotion of bone reconstruction and the strength of bone–implant bonding, as well as the acceleration of post-operative tissue healing. The most promising substances include sclerostin-antibody, collagen-binding promoting peptides, osteocyte adhesion promoting peptides, osteoblast and fibroblast growth factors, antibiotics, bisphosphonates, and statins [14].
In the field of orthodontics, research aimed at modifying the surface of orthodontic wires and brackets to increase their antibacterial and antifungal properties is particularly interesting. Promising results were presented after the use of long-chain polyethylene glycol, 1,3,5-triacryloylhexahydro-1,3,5-triazine, bioglass with niobium phosphate, methacryloyloxydodecylpyridinium, and polymethyl methacrylate resins. Research on the use of nanoparticles seems particularly promising. The best results were achieved with coatings containing titanium dioxide (TiO2), gold (Au), silver (Ag), copper (Cu/CuO), silica (SiO2) and zinc oxide (ZnO), or curcumin [10,20]. In the case of the covering elements of the fixed appliances, an additional difficulty is the necessity for maintaining an appropriate coefficient of friction for the modified surfaces and their resistance to sliding and bending. However, in this context, an additional benefit of using orthodontic wire coatings may be to increase their resistance. The influence of the oral cavity environment, which can, in the course of treatment, significantly change the mechanical properties of wires, especially nickel-titanium wires, is also a critical research topic [10,21].
An analysis of the achievements of recent years shows that further research is needed to develop methods for modifying the surface of the elements used in the oral cavity. Surfaces that are modified to achieve a bioactive effect enable better therapeutic results and minimize the risk of complications. Therefore, the cooperation between specialists in various branches of dentistry, medicine, and material science specialists is very promising.
This Special Issue aims to provide a forum for scientists to share current developments and promote further research into the behavior of bioactive coatings in the challenging oral environment. We invite you to publish original research conducted in-vivo, in-vitro, in-silico; theoretical calculations; systematic reviews; and meta-analyses.

Author Contributions

M.S. and E.A. contributed equally to this work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Rocha, I.; Ma, Y.; Souza-Alonso, P.; Vosátka, M.; Freitas, H.; Oliveira, R.S. Seed Coating: A Tool for Delivering Beneficial Microbes to Agricultural Crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Łabowska, M.B.; Cierluk, K.; Jankowska, A.M.; Kulbacka, J.; Detyna, J.; Michalak, I. A Review on the Adaption of Alginate-Gelatin Hydrogels for 3D Cultures and Bioprinting. Materials 2021, 14, 858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Amirtharaj Mosas, K.K.; Chandrasekar, A.R.; Dasan, A.; Pakseresht, A.; Galusek, D. Recent Advancements in Materials and Coatings for Biomedical Implants. Gels 2022, 8, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, X.; Huang, T.; Heath, D.E.; O’Brien-Simpson, N.M.; O’Connor, A.J. Antimicrobial nanoparticle coatings for medical implants: Design challenges and prospects. Biointerphases 2020, 1915, 060801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bjelić, D.; Finšgar, M. The Role of Growth Factors in Bioactive Coatings. Pharmaceutics 2021, 13, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rivera, L.R.; Cochis, A.; Biser, S.; Canciani, E.; Ferraris, S.; Rimondini, L.; Boccaccini, A.R. Antibacterial, pro-angiogenic and pro-osteointegrative zein-bioactive glass/copper based coatings for implantable stainless steel aimed at bone healing. Bioact. Mater. 2020, 6, 1479–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sarul, M.; Kavala, B.; Kavala, M.; Antoszewska-Smith, J. Do the NiTi low and constant force levels remain stable in vivo? Eur. J. Orthod. 2015, 37, 656–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Paradowska-Stolarz, A.; Wieckiewicz, M.; Owczarek, A.; Wezgowiec, J. Natural Polymers for the Maintenance of Oral Health: Review of Recent Advances and Perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abhay, S.S.; Ganapathy, D.; Veeraiyan, D.N.; Ariga, P.; Heboyan, A.; Amornvit, P.; Rokaya, D.; Srimaneepong, V. Wear Resistance, Color Stability and Displacement Resistance of Milled PEEK Crowns Compared to Zirconia Crowns under Stimulated Chewing and High-Performance Aging. Polymers 2021, 13, 3761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bącela, J.; Łabowska, M.B.; Detyna, J.; Zięta, A.; Michalak, I. Functional Coatings for Orthodontic Archwires—A Review. Materials 2020, 13, 3257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kligman, S.; Ren, Z.; Chung, C.-H.; Perillo, M.A.; Chang, Y.-C.; Koo, H.; Zheng, Z.; Li, C. The Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration and Biofilm Formation. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Almas, K.; Smith, S.; Kutkut, A. What is the Best Micro and Macro Dental Implant Topography? Dent. Clin. 2019, 63, 447–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hickok, N.J.; Shapiro, I.M.; Chen, A.F. The Impact of Incorporating Antimicrobials into Implant Surfaces. J. Dent. Res. 2018, 97, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Karthik, K.; Sivaraj, S.; Thangaswamy, V. Evaluation of implant success: A review of past and present concepts. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2013, 5, S117–S119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ionescu, A.C.; Brambilla, E.; Azzola, F.; Ottobelli, M.; Pellegrini, G.; Francetti, L.A. Laser microtextured titanium implant surfaces reduce in vitro and in situ oral biofilm formation. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0202262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Smeets, R.; Stadlinger, B.; Schwarz, F.; Beck-Broichsitter, B.; Jung, O.; Precht, C.; Kloss, F.; Grobe, A.; Heiland, M.; Ebker, T. Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration. BioMed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 6285620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Gurzawska, K.; Dirscherl, K.; Jørgensen, B.; Berglundh, T.; Jørgensen, N.R.; Gotfredsen, K. Pectin nanocoating of titanium implant surfaces-an experimental study in rabbits. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2017, 28, 298–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Garaicoa, J.L.; Bates, A.M.; Avila-Ortiz, G.; Brogden, K.A. Antimicrobial Prosthetic Surfaces in the Oral Cavity-A Perspective on Creative Approaches. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lampe, I.; Beke, D.; Biri, S.; Csarnovics, I.; Csik, A.; Dombradi, Z.; Hajdu, P.; Hegedus, V.; Racz, R.; Varga, I.; et al. Investigation of silver nanoparticles on titanium surface created by ion implantation technology. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 4709–4721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kielan-Grabowska, Z.; Bącela, J.; Zięta, A.; Seremak, W.; Gawlik-Maj, M.; Kavala, B.; Borak, B.; Detyna, J.; Sarul, M. Improvement of Properties of Stainless Steel Orthodontic Archwire Using TiO2: Ag Coating. Symmetry 2021, 13, 1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sarul, M.; Rutkowska-Gorczyca, M.; Detyna, J.; Zięta, A.; Kavala, M.; Antoszewska-Smith, J. Do Mechanical and Physicochemical Properties of Orthodontic NiTi Wires Remain Stable In Vivo? Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 5268629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sarul, M.; Amm, E. Bioactive Coatings in Dentistry—What Is the Future? Coatings 2022, 12, 842. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12060842

AMA Style

Sarul M, Amm E. Bioactive Coatings in Dentistry—What Is the Future? Coatings. 2022; 12(6):842. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12060842

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sarul, Michal, and Elie Amm. 2022. "Bioactive Coatings in Dentistry—What Is the Future?" Coatings 12, no. 6: 842. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12060842

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop