Next Article in Journal
Dual Microcapsules Encapsulating Liquid Diamine and Isocyanate for Application in Self-Healing Coatings
Previous Article in Journal
The “Restoration of the Restoration”: Investigation of a Complex Surface and Interface Pattern in the Roman Wall Paintings of Volsinii Novi (Bolsena, Central Italy)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Lead Leakage of Pb-Based Perovskite Solar Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dual Strategy Based on Quantum Dot Doping and Phenylethylamine Iodide Surface Modification for High-Performance and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells

1
Engineering Research Center for Nanophotonics & Advanced Instrument, Ministry of Education, School of Physics and Electronic Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
2
Joint Institute of Advanced Science and Technology, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
3
Chongqing Key Laboratory of Precision Optics, Chongqing Institute of East China Normal University, Chongqing 401120, China
4
Fujian Key Laboratory of Surface and Interface Engineering for High Performance Materials, College of Materials, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2024, 14(4), 409; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14040409
Submission received: 7 March 2024 / Revised: 25 March 2024 / Accepted: 27 March 2024 / Published: 29 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Perovskite Photovoltaics: From Materials to Device Applications)

Abstract

:
High-quality perovskite films (PFs) are crucial for achieving high-performance perovskite solar cells (PSCs). Herein, we report a dual-modification strategy via incorporating CsPbBr3 QDs into MAPbI3 perovskite bulk and capping the interface of the perovskite/hole transport layer (HTL) with phenylethylamine iodide (PEAI) to improve perovskite crystallinity and interface contact properties to acquire high-quality PFs with fewer defects. CsPbBr3 QDs promoted perovskite grain growth and reduced bulk defects, while PEAI surface modification passivated interfaces, improved hydrophobic properties, and prevented carrier recombination at the perovskite/HTL interface. Benefiting from growth control and the effective suppression of both bulk and interface carrier recombination, the resulting devices show a greatly improved photoelectric conversion efficiency (PCE) from 17.21% of the reference cells to 21.04% with a champion Voc of 1.15 V, Jsc of 23.30 mA/cm2, and fill factor (FF) of 78.6%. Furthermore, the dual-modification strategy endows PFs with promoted moisture tolerance, and the nonencapsulated PSCs retain 75% of their initial efficiency after aging for 30 days at 40% relative humidity and room temperature, which is significantly higher than the 59% value of the original PSCs. Good operational stability and the maintained efficiency of the target device over time suggest the potential for future commercialization.

1. Introduction

Organic–inorganic hybrid perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have become the most promising next-generation photovoltaic technology due to their advantages of a simple preparation process, low cost, adjustable direct bandgap, and high photoelectric conversion efficiency (PCE) [1,2,3]. In 2009, the first PSCs were successfully prepared by using methylammonium lead iodide (MAPbI3) and methylammonium lead bromide (MAPbBr3) perovskite material as a light-absorbing layer and achieved a PCE of 3.8% [4]. Three years later, Michael Gratzel’s group introduced the solid-state Spiro-OMeTAD (2,2′,7,7′-Tetrakis [N,N-di (4-methoxyphenyl) amino]-9,9′-spirobifluorene) as the hole transport layer (HTL) material, which made the PCE of PSCs improve to 9.7% [5]. Subsequently, more and more researchers have engaged in this field, and the performance of PSCs has constantly been refreshed by various technologies [6,7]. At present, the latest certification efficiency of PSCs has reached 26.1% [8], which is very close to the conversion efficiency of monocrystalline silicon solar cells.
As the crucial part of PSCs, the crystallinity, grain size, defect density, and interfacial characteristics of the perovskite light-absorbing layer will significantly affect the light absorption, stability, carrier transport and extraction, PCE, and service life of the final PSCs [9,10,11]. Therefore, high-quality perovskite films (PFs) with well-crystallized grains, large grain size, high surface coverage, and low surface roughness are considered to be essential to acquire high-performance PSCs [6,12,13]. Previous investigations have demonstrated that PFs with the desired morphologies can be fabricated by the anti-solvent process [14,15,16], dual-source co-evaporation [17], spraying method [18], and so on. Among them, dripping anti-solvent into the perovskite precursor is an effective “one-step” solution process for preparing highly efficient PSCs, particularly when adopting cesium lead halide perovskite quantum dot (CsPbBr3 QD) additives into the anti-solvent to control nucleation and further improve the quality of PFs [19,20]. As is known, CsPbBr3 QDs have demonstrated swift achievements for potential display applications because of their excellent optical properties, such as ultrahigh photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY), tunable bandgap, narrow full width at half maximum (FWHM), high defect tolerance, etc. [21]. Based on these, Yao et al. added CsPbBr3 QDs to Diethyl Ether (DE) anti-solvent as heterogeneous nucleation centers to promote the formation of smooth and pinhole-free PFs with increased particle size, reduced defects, and increased carrier lifetime. Finally, the champion PSCs showed a PCE of 20.17% [22].
Solution-processed PFs are polycrystalline, and usually contain many substantial defects such as grain boundaries, vacancies, lattice discontinuities, and surface microscopic pinholes. External water vapor and oxygen will first destroy perovskite crystals through these defects to cause irreversible phase transition and degradation of perovskite from the outside to the inside [23,24,25]. These defects are most easily formed on the surface and interfaces of PFs; therefore, the passivation of the surface and interface defects is always one of the most important tasks when fabricating highly efficient PSCs [26,27,28]. Recently, several halide organic amine salts such as butyl amine iodide (BAI), naprodium methamine iodide (NMAI), and phenylethylamine iodide (PEAI) have been used to modify two-dimensional PFs to passivate dangling bonds [29,30].
In summary, both surface modification and nucleation growth control through adding QDs to anti-solvents exhibit great promotion of highly efficient and stable PSCs. The dual-protection strategy achieved by combining them is a better choice to acquire high-quality PFs and ultimately improve the performances of PSCs. In this paper, a very small amount of CsPbBr3 QDs were first added to ChloroBenzene (CB) anti-solvent to help the nucleation and grain growth of MAPbI3 films. Br and Cs+ in CsPbBr3 entered into the inner crystal lattice of MAPbI3 to replace MA+ and I and form a dense and stable CsxMA1-xPbI3-yBry film with low defects and large grains. Then, as-fabricated CsxMA1-xPbI3-yBry was secondarily passivated by spin-coating an ultrathin PEAI molecular layer on its surface to reduce the surface roughness and further fill the surface and grain boundary defects. As a result, the non-radiative recombination between carriers at the perovskite layer surface was reduced and the leakage current inside the device was inhibited by hindering the direct contact between electrons and HTL at the grain boundary. Benefiting from the dual-protection strategy, the fabricated device with dual modification exhibited considerable efficiency enhancement from 17.21% of the reference to 21.04%. The hydrophobic property of the PEAI molecular layer combined with the dense and high-crystallinity CsxMA1-xPbI3-yBry structure markedly enhanced the moisture resistance and stability of the jointly modified PSCs.

2. Experimental Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Cs2CO3 (99.5%), oleic acid (OA, 80%–90%), oleamide (OAm, 80%–90%), 1-octadecene (ODE, 90%), isopropyl alcohol (99.9%), N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF, 99.9%, HPLC), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, 99.9%, ultra-dry), CB (99%) and bis(trifluoromethane)sulfonimide lithium salt (Li-TFSI, 99.9%) were purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). Methylammonium iodide (MAI, 99.5%), lead (II) iodide (PbI2, 99.99%), and lead bromide (PbBr2, 99%) were purchased from Xi’an poly company (Xi’an, China). Toluene (99.5%) was purchased from Chinese medicine (Shanghai, China). Ethylacetate (99.8%, water ≤ 50 ppm) was bought from Acmec (Shanghai, China). SnO2 aqueous solution (Alfa, 15%) and Spiro-MeoTAD (99.5%) were bought from Ningbo Borun New Materials Company (Ningbo, Zhejiang, China).

2.2. Synthesis of CsPbBr3 Perovskite QDs

Preparation of Cs-oleate (Cs-OA): 0.2 g Cs2CO3, 10 mL ODE, and 1.25 mL OA were added into a 25 mL 3-neck flask which was full of N2. The mixture was continuously stirred with a magnetic stirrer. At the same time, the reaction temperature slowly rose to 120 °C for 1 h, and then the solution was heated to 150 °C for 5 h under N2 until it was completely clear. The resultant Cs-OA was stored in N2 and pre-heated to 100 °C before injection.
Synthesis of CsPbBr3 QDs: 0.2 g PbBr2 and 10 mL ODE, 1.5 mL OA, and 1.5 mL OAm were added to a 25 mL three-necked flask and slowly heated to 120 °C for 1 h under vacuum. After complete solubilization of a PbBr2 salt, the solution was heated to 160 °C, and then 0.8 mL Cs-oleate precursor was rapidly injected. After complete reaction for 10 s, it was quickly cooled by ice bath treatment to obtain the CsPbBr3 QDs. It was purified more than twice with a mixture of EA and toluene (2:1). Finally, as-prepared CsPbBr3 QDs were dispersed in CB according to different concentration requirements for further use.

2.3. Device Fabrication

The etched ITO glass (10 Ω/□) was cleaned by detergent, deionized water, ethanol, and acetone, and blow-dried with clean air. The diluted SnO2 colloid solution (3 wt%) was spin-coated on the ITO glass at the speed of 3000 rpm/min for 30 s and then annealed at 150 °C for 30 min. After annealing, the SnO2 compact layer was cleaned using UV ozone before further spin-coating of the next layer. Next, 55 μL perovskite precursor (40 wt%, 1M MAI, 1M PbI2 dissolved in DMF/DMSO (8:2)) was spin-coated on the SnO2 layer at the speed of 3000 rpm/min for 30 s; 10 s after the start of the process, 300 μL CB with/without CsPbBr3 QDs was dropped onto the wet film, and then annealed at 100 °C for 10 min.
For the PEAI-modified layer, 2 mg/mL of PEAI isopropanol solution was directly used for spin coating (4000 rpm/min) on the CsPbBr3 QD-doped perovskite film layer for surface modification.
The Spiro-OMeTAD solution (72.3 mg/mL in CB) with 28.5 μL TPB and 17.5 μL of Li-TFSI solution (520 mg/mL in acetonitrile) was spin-coated on the perovskite layer at the speed of 4000 rpm/min for 30 s to form HTL. Finally, a 90 nm thick Ag electrode was evaporated under the vacuum pressure of 8 × 10−4 Pa.

2.4. Characterizations

The transmission electron microscope (TEM) images were obtained by a high-resolution transmission electron microscope from Hitachi F 2100 (Tokyo, Japan). The UV-Vis absorption spectra were characterized by using a UV-vis spectrophotometer (Cary 5000), (Beijing, China). The steady-state and time-resolution photoluminescence (TRPL) spectra were recorded by the FLS 980 system (Edinburgh, UK). The X-ray power diffractometer (XRD) was tested by a Bruker D8 ADVANCE (Karlsruhe, Germany) using Cu Kα radiation as the X-ray source. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were obtained by a Zeiss Sigma 300 system (Oberkochen, Germany). Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was performed using a Nanoscope V Multimode 8 scanning probe microscope from Bruker Corporation (Karlsruhe, Germany). Atomic energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping of the perovskite was taken by a JEM-2100 high-resolution transmission electron microscope (JEOL, Doakido, Japan). The decay curve was recorded by using the FLS 980 with the laser emission wavelength of 470 nm. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data were tested by an ESCALAB 250XI system (Thermo Scientific Company, Waltham, MA, USA). The J-V curves and steady power output were tested by a Newport Sunlight Simulator(Newport Company, Dresher, PA, USA), Keithley-2440 digital resource and 0.1 cm2 Shelter mask. The electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) curves were characterized by using an Auto-lab chemical station with the bias voltage of −0.9 V. The C-V, space charge-limited current (SCLC), transient photovoltage (TPV), and transient photocurrent (TPC) decay curves were obtained by using an electrochemical workstation (Zahner, Kronach, Germany). The stabilities of PSCs were characterized by recording their steady-state current outputs under 100 mW/cm2 simulating sunlight, and normalized PCE curves varied with time at a relative humidity of 40% and room temperature (RT). It needs to be pointed out that experiments were carried out in an ambient atmosphere without encapsulation.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphology and Optical Properties of CsPbBr3 QDs

To achieve the purpose of doping with CsPbBr3 QDs to assist the nucleation and grain growth of PFs, we must first synthesize uniform and stable CsPbBr3 QDs. Figure 1 shows the TEM morphology and PL spectra of as-prepared CsPbBr3 QDs. It can be seen that as-synthesized QDs present uniformly dispersed cubic crystalline grains with an average diameter of about 10 nm (Figure 1a). Under the excitation of 365 nm ultraviolet (UV) light, it emits bright green fluorescence with an emission peak at 511.1 nm, which is consistent with the emission of CsPbBr3 QDs reported in the references [31].
In order to confirm that the cubic grain belongs to the CsPbBr3 phase, XRD characterization was performed and is presented in Figure 2. The diffraction peaks at 15.9° and 31.3° are attributed to the (100) and (200) crystal planes of cubic CsPbBr3 perovskite (PDF 18-0364), respectively, and no other impurity peaks appear. This proves that pure CsPbBr3 QDs with good crystallinity have been successfully synthesized.

3.2. Effect of CsPbBr3 QDs Doping and PEAI Surface Modification on the Morphology and Crystallization of PFs

Figure 3a–d show the SEM images of MAPbI3 films doped with different concentrations of CsPbBr3 QDs at 0, 0.2, 2, and 10 μg/mL in CB anti-solvent. It can be seen that the grain size of the reference is relatively small, while after adding CsPbBr3 QDs to the anti-solvent, MAPbI3 crystals obviously grow and reach the maximum at 2 μg/mL CsPbBr3 QDs. This is attributed to the CsPbBr3 QDs present in the anti-solvent, which act as nucleation sites during the perovskite growth process. The appropriate concentration of CsPbBr3 QDs can facilitate the nucleation process, leading to the formation of large-grain-size and dense perovskite films. However, the introduction of an excessive amount of CsPbBr3 QDs nucleation sites can restrict the growth of MAPbI3 perovskite crystals, leading to a reduction in grain size [19,32]. When concentration is further increased to 10 μg/mL, the grain size of the film is reduced instead, but it is still larger than that of the reference sample [32]. Due to the limitations of the resolution and SEM technique, there is no significant change in the SEM image of jointly modified PFs (Figure 3e). Therefore, more advanced AFM was adopted to characterize their three-dimensional surface morphologies. The results are exhibited in Figure S1.
The grain size of PFs doped with 2 μg/mL CsPbBr3 QDs was significantly increased from 161.2 ± 25.4 nm in the control to 235.1 ± 22.1 nm, and simultaneously the surface became denser and smoother with a reduced surface roughness (RMS) of 65.1 nm (75.6 nm for the reference perovskite). After further surface modification by PEAI (Figure 3e and Figure S1c), although the grain size of the film did not increase significantly (236.4 ± 23.1 nm), the RMS was further reduced to 58.8 nm. This reduction in roughness indicates that the modified PEAI molecules can uniformly cover the grain boundaries and interfaces of the perovskite layer, thereby finely tuning the surface morphology of the film [30].
The largest grain size for the CsPbBr3 QD-modified perovskite layer is further supported by XRD patterns from Figure 4. The (110) peak intensity of PFs modified with CsPbBr3 QDs was enhanced compared to the undoped sample. The PFs with 2 μg/mL CsPbBr3 QDs showed the strongest peak intensity and the corresponding narrowest FWHM of 0.178°, as shown in Table S1. From Figure 4b and Table S1, it can also be found that the position of the (110) peak gradually moves towards the large angle from 13.97° for the reference to 14.04° of the PFs modified with 10 μg/mL CsPbBr3 QDs. This is because the smaller radius of Cs+ and Br ions in CsPbBr3 QDs enter the MAPbI3 lattice to replace the larger MA+ and I to form CsxMA1-xPbI3-yBry, resulting in a contraction of the perovskite lattice [33], which can be further proved by EDS mappings of CsPbBr3 QDs and PEAI dual-modification PFs in Figure S2. Br elements, like Pb and I, are evenly distributed in the grains of perovskite after further surface modification by PEAI (Figure S1c), although the grain size, (110) diffraction peak intensity, position, and FWHM remain almost unchanged (Table S1). This demonstrates that the modified PEAI molecules can uniformly cover the grain boundary and interface of the perovskite layer, slightly adjust the surface morphology of the film, and thereby reduce its roughness [34,35]. In addition, PEAI also has the function of filling the ion vacancies and passivating defects on the surface of PFs, which will be discussed in detail later. High-quality PFs with better crystallinity, large grain size, and a dense and smooth surface will help to improve the photovoltaic performance of PSCs [36,37].

3.3. Effect of Joint Modification of CsPbBr3 QDs Combined with PEAI on Optical Properties as Well as Binding Energy of PFs

The better crystallinity of the dually modified PFs can enhance their corresponding optical properties, as shown in Figure 5. As expected, the absorbance and PL intensity were gradually increased in the order of the reference sample, the PFs modified with only CsPbBr3 QDs, and dually modified PFs based on QDs and PEAI (Figure 5a,c). However, the bandgap from Tauc plots and the emission position of the three kinds of PFs remain almost unchanged. These results support the superior crystallinity and reduced defects of the dual-modification MAPbI3 films [36]. The better crystallinity of the perovskite layer usually produces a stronger PL intensity because fewer defects can reduce carrier recombination. The enhanced light absorption indicates the suppression of band-edge trap states by the dual-protection strategy, which will help to increase the photocurrent density of PSCs.
To further study the charge-carrier recombination dynamic, TRPL spectra are exhibited in Figure 5d. The fluorescence decay curves can be fitted as a triple-exponential function like Equation (1) [38,39,40]:
Y t = A 1 e τ τ 1 + A 2 e τ τ 2 + A 3 e τ τ 3
where A1, A2, and A3 are the coefficients of the non-radiative, radiative, and Auger recombination, respectively, and τ1, τ2, and τ3 represent decay lifetimes [40]. The average fluorescence lifetime is calculated according to the following Equation (2):
τ a v r = A 1 τ 1 2 + A 2 τ 2 2 + A 3 τ 3 2 A 1 τ 1 + A 2 τ 2 + A 3 τ 3
and they are 33.5 ns, 41.73 ns, and 75.84 ns, respectively, which is consistent with the strongest intensity of steady-state PL for the dually modified PFs. Undoubtedly, the longer lifetime is attributed to the high-quality film fabricated by the dual-protection strategy which passivates the defects in and on the surface of the perovskite layer and reduces the probability of non-radiative recombination between carriers. This will ultimately help to improve the Voc and FF of PSCs [37].
The comparative XPS spectra in Figure 6 can further verify the interactions between CsPbBr3 QDs, PEAI, and MAPbI3 perovskite crystals. Obviously, the binding energies of Pb 4f5/2 and Pb 4f3/2 of PFs dually modified with CsPbBr3 QDs and PEAI increase from 138.45 eV and 143.3 eV of the reference perovskite layer to 138.63 eV and 143.47 eV, respectively, indicating that Pb2+ in perovskite crystals interacts with the surface-modified PEAI molecules via chemical bonds. At the same time, it can be found that the signal from metal Pb (Pb 0) is significantly suppressed, which suggests that there exist fewer lead vacancies inside and on the surface of the dually modified perovskite film [41]. Similarly, the orbital binding energies of I 3d5/2 and 3d3/2 also move from 619.35 eV and 630.86 eV in the reference sample to the higher-energy region of 619.45 eV and 630.94 eV of the joint passivation sample. By calculation, the corresponding binding energy from Pb-I was slightly reduced by 0.07 eV. This is attributed to Cs+ and Br ions in the CsPbBr3 QDs entering the MAPbI3 lattice to form a more stable CsxMA1-xPbI3-yBry perovskite structure [42,43]. A few amounts of Pb-Br bonds substitute for Pb-I bonds, which thus weaken the binding energy of Pb-I. Overall, the stable perovskite structure, fewer lead ion defects, and surface-modified PEAI will be beneficial for improving the stability of PFs and PSCs.

3.4. Photovoltaic Properties of PSCs Jointly Modified by CsPbBr3 QDs and PEAI

To directly demonstrate the superior performances of jointly modified PSCs, five kinds of PSCs were fabricated according to the structure shown in Figure 7a, and their photovoltaic characteristics were analyzed. The detailed photovoltaic parameters are listed in Table 1. Figure 7b,c show the J-V scan curves and monochromatic incident photon-to-electron conversion efficiency (IPCE) data of PSCs that were unmodified, modified only by CsPbBr3 QDs, and jointly modified by CsPbBr3 QDs and PEAI. PSCs only modified with CsPbBr3 QDs acquired a PCE of 20.08% with a Voc of 1.13 V, Jsc of 23.20 mA/cm2, and FF of 76.6% when the optimized CsPbBr3 QDs concentration of 2 μg/mL was doped, which is markedly higher than the 17.21% of the reference device. The enhanced photovoltaic properties benefit from the obtained stable CsxMA1-xPbI3-yBry perovskite film with the large grains and low bulk defects which improve light absorption and suppress carrier recombination inside perovskite crystals. PSCs with dual modification of CsPbBr3 QDs and PEAI can further improve PCE and show the best value of 21.04% with Voc increased to 1.15 V, Jsc to 23.30 mA/cm2, and FF up to 78.6%. This is because PEAI molecules uniformly cover the grain boundary and interface of the perovskite layer, further fill the ion vacancies, slightly adjust the surface morphology of the film, and effectively block the direct contact between HTL and ETL at the perovskite grain boundary. Correspondingly, the integrated current value of the jointly modified PSC also increases from 19.4 mA/cm2 of the reference cell to 22.6 mA/cm2, which matches with the current density results obtained from the J-V scanning curve.
The defect density of PFs can be calculated by the space charge limit current (SCLC) curves of electron-only devices modified by different methods. As shown in Figure 8a, the structure of electron-only devices is an ITO/SnO2/perovskite layer with different modified methods/PC61BM/Ag. The corresponding SCLC curves are exhibited in Figure 8b. The voltage cross-points of extension lines from the Tangent of Ohm area and trap-filled area are defined as the trap-filling limit voltage (VTFL). The VTFL values of the reference, modified only by CsPbBr3 QDs, and jointly modified by CsPbBr3 QDs and PEAI perovskite devices are 0.564 V, 0.341 V, and 0.221 V, respectively. The reduced VTFL means that defects of the perovskite layer have greatly been suppressed after modification, which can be further proven by the calculated defect density according to the following Equation (3):
N t = ε ε 0 V T F L e L 2
where L is the thickness (350 nm), ɛ and ɛ0 are the dielectric constant and the vacuum permittivity of the perovskite layer, and e is the charge quantity of an electron (1.6 × 10−19 C) [43,44]. The defect density (Nt) of the doubly modified perovskite layer is only 0.71 × 1016 cm−3, which is obviously smaller than 0.97 × 1016 cm−3 of the solely QD-modified sample and 1.65 × 1016 cm−3 of the reference perovskite layer, which supports the best performance of PSCs in Figure 7.
The dark J-V curves and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of three kinds of PSCs were also measured and are given in Figure 9. It is evident that the dark current density of the CsPbBr3 QD-modified PSCs has decreased by nearly two orders of magnitude compared to the reference device, while the PSCs jointly modified with QDs and PEAI have the lowest dark current density. The corresponding recombination resistance is 3986 Ω, which is larger than the values of 2987 and 1156 Ω for the QD-modified and reference PSCs, respectively. These results further support that the joint modification of QDs and PEAI can reduce carrier recombination at the interface and improve PCEs.
Figure S3 shows TPV and TPC decay curves of the original and jointly modified PSCs. The lifetime of carriers is defined as the time of the cell voltage drop to the 1/e of the initial value [45]. It can be seen in Figure S3a that the lifetime of the reference cell is 0.087 ms, while after dual modification, it is dramatically enhanced to 0.512 ms. The slower voltage decay suggests that the carrier recombination has been limited because of the dual passivation and blocking effect of QDs combined with PEAI. Simultaneously, the faster photocurrent decay for jointly modified PSCs (23.1 μs relative to 35.5 μs in the original cell) in Figure S3b indicate that carriers can be more easily extracted and transported from the perovskite layer to the carrier transport layer. Furthermore, the energy alignment of the reference, CsPbBr3 QD-, and PEAI-modified PSCs are given in Figure S4. The doping of QDs has a negligible impact on the energy levels of the MAPbI3 reference layer [22]. However, after PEAI modification, a thin insulating layer of PEAI molecules is formed at the interface of the perovskite film, creating a high-energy-level barrier. According to the hole tunneling equation (Supporting Information) [30], under the influence of the built-in electric field, it is more likely for the holes to tunnel from the valence band of the perovskite layer to the valence band of the Spiro-OMeTAD hole transport layer, thereby promoting the transport and collection of hole carriers. Simultaneously, the insulation effect reduces the probability of electron–hole recombination at the interface between the conduction band of the perovskite and the valence band of the Spiro-OMeTAD layer [30,46], ultimately enhancing the optoelectronic performance of the co-modified PSCs.

3.5. Stabilities of PSCs Jointly Modified by CsPbBr3 QDs and PEAI

Figure 10a,b present the hydrophilic contact angle test for the unmodified and jointly modified PFs. The contact angles are 34.5° and 48.2°, respectively, indicating that the spin-coated PEAI molecular layer enhances the hydrophobicity of PFs, which can better suppress the erosion of water vapor on perovskite films and improve the ambient stability of the final devices. Furthermore, the steady-state maximum power output curves of two kinds of unpacked PSCs were recorded at different bias voltages for 120 s under the ambient conditions of 20 °C and relative humidity of 40% in Figure 10c. The QD and PEAI jointly modified PSCs show not only a higher power output of 20.56% but also a better stability of current output. After aging for 30 days, the normalized PECs of the jointly modified cell still maintain 75% of the original PCE, while the reference PSCs only retain 59% of the initial value (Figure 10d). Furthermore, the VOC, FF, and JSC of the jointly modified PSCs also show the relatively gentle changes compared to the reference cell (Figure S5). The better crystallinity and hydrophobicity properties, the more compact and smoother surface, and the reduced defect density of the perovskite layer can contribute to better light and ambient stability for the QD and PEAI jointly modified PSCs [47].

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have demonstrated that the dual-protection strategy via a bulk dopant with CsPbBr3 QDs and surface modification with PEAI has enabled us to enhance the efficiency and stability of PSCs. The doped CsPbBr3 QDs acted as condensation nuclei to promote the nucleation and grain growth of MAPbI3 films. Simultaneously, Br and Cs+ entered into the inner crystal lattice of MAPbI3 to replace MA + and I and form dense and stable CsxMA1-xPbI3-yBry PFs with low defects and large grains. Furthermore, the modified PEAI molecules not only formed a uniform ultrathin layer to block the direct contact of ETL and HTL at the perovskite grain boundary, but also filled the ion vacancies and passivated defects on the surface, thereby suppressing the recombination of carriers. High-quality PFs, excellent interface contacts, and hydrophobic properties together promoted the transport and extraction of carriers at the interface between the perovskite layer and HTL. As a result, the fabricated PSCs with dual modification exhibited an improved PCE of 21.04% with a Voc of 1.15 V, Jsc of 23.30 mA/cm2, and FF of 78.6%. The corresponding better light and ambient stability has been achieved.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/coatings14040409/s1, Figure S1: AFM images and grain size statistics of perovskite films modified with different conditions: (a) reference, (b) doped with 2 μg/mL CsPbBr3 QDs, (c) jointly modified with CsPbBr3 QDs and PEAI.; Figure S2: EDS mappings of PFs jointly modified with CsPbBr3 QDs and PEAI: (a) SEM pattern, (b) C element, (c) Pb element, (d) Br element, (e) I element, (f) the combination of SEM and mappings. Table S1: The parameters of (110) diffraction peak of PFs modified at different conditions; Table S2: Simple comparison of PCE MAPbI3 perovskite solar cells. Figure S3: (a) Dark J-V curves and (b) EIS (dark condition, bias voltage −0.85 V) of PSCs modified at different conditions. Figure S4: TPV (a) and TPC (b) decay curves of original and jointly modified PSCs. Figure S5: Aging curves of normalized VOC (a), FF(b) and JSC (c) in air condition with a RH of 40% and RT (unpacked). References [22,48,49,50,51,52,53,54] are cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: S.Z. and T.X.; Methodology: S.Z. and N.H.; Investigation: S.Z. and S.H.; Data curation: S.Z. and H.L.; Formal analysis: S.Z.; R.C. and M.Q.; Resources: M.Q.; B.L. and X.C.; Writing—Original Draft: S.Z.; Writing—Review and Editing: X.C., T.X. and H.L.; Supervision: H.L. and X.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 12274136), Shanghai Municipal Natural Science Foundation (No. 19ZR1415400, 18ZR1411000 and 18ZR1411900), Chongqing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (No. 33606015, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Precision Optics, Chongqing Institute of East China Normal University, Chongqing 401120, China), and Joint Institute of Advanced Science and Technology, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, People’s Republic of China (No. 40500-20105-222053).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yang, W.S.; Park, B.-W.; Jung, E.H.; Jeon, N.J.; Kim, Y.C.; Lee, D.U.; Shin, S.S.; Seo, J.; Kim, E.K.; Noh, J.H.; et al. Iodide Management in Formamidinium-Lead-Halide–Based Perovskite Layers for Efficient Solar Cells. Science 2017, 356, 1376–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tan, H.; Jain, A.; Voznyy, O.; Lan, X.; García De Arquer, F.P.; Fan, J.Z.; Quintero-Bermudez, R.; Yuan, M.; Zhang, B.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Efficient and Stable Solution-Processed Planar Perovskite Solar Cells via Contact Passivation. Science 2017, 355, 722–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jeon, N.J.; Noh, J.H.; Yang, W.S.; Kim, Y.C.; Ryu, S.; Seo, J.; Seok, S.I. Compositional Engineering of Perovskite Materials for High-Performance Solar Cells. Nature 2015, 517, 476–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kojima, A.; Teshima, K.; Shirai, Y.; Miyasaka, T. Organometal Halide Perovskites as Visible-Light Sensitizers for Photovoltaic Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6050–6051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Calió, L.; Kazim, S.; Grätzel, M.; Ahmad, S. Hole-Transport Materials for Perovskite Solar Cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 14522–14545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, M.; Kim, G.-H.; Lee, T.K.; Choi, I.W.; Choi, H.W.; Jo, Y.; Yoon, Y.J.; Kim, J.W.; Lee, J.; Huh, D.; et al. Methylammonium Chloride Induces Intermediate Phase Stabilization for Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells. Joule 2019, 3, 2179–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yoo, J.J.; Seo, G.; Chua, M.R.; Park, T.G.; Lu, Y.; Rotermund, F.; Kim, Y.-K.; Moon, C.S.; Jeon, N.J.; Correa-Baena, J.-P.; et al. Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells via Improved Carrier Management. Nature 2021, 590, 587–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, T.; Mao, K.; Meng, H.; Zhu, Z.; Peng, W.; Yuan, S.; Xu, J.; Feng, X.; Xu, Z.; Xu, J. Understanding the Interfacial Reactions and Band Alignment for Efficient and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells Built on Metal Substrates with Reduced Upscaling Losses. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2211959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jung, E.H.; Jeon, N.J.; Park, E.Y.; Moon, C.S.; Shin, T.J.; Yang, T.-Y.; Noh, J.H.; Seo, J. Efficient, Stable and Scalable Perovskite Solar Cells Using Poly(3-Hexylthiophene). Nature 2019, 567, 511–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bu, T.; Ono, L.K.; Li, J.; Su, J.; Tong, G.; Zhang, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Chang, J.; Kazaoui, S.; et al. Modulating Crystal Growth of Formamidinium–Caesium Perovskites for over 200 cm2 Photovoltaic Sub-Modules. Nat. Energy 2022, 7, 528–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, G.; Liang, R.; Ge, M.; Sun, G.; Zhang, Y.; Xing, G. Surface Passivation Using 2D Perovskites toward Efficient and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, 2105635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Park, J.; Kim, J.; Yun, H.-S.; Paik, M.J.; Noh, E.; Mun, H.J.; Kim, M.G.; Shin, T.J.; Seok, S.I. Controlled Growth of Perovskite Layers with Volatile Alkylammonium Chlorides. Nature 2023, 616, 724–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhou, N.; Shen, Y.; Li, L.; Tan, S.; Liu, N.; Zheng, G.; Chen, Q.; Zhou, H. Exploration of Crystallization Kinetics in Quasi Two-Dimensional Perovskite and High Performance Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 459–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yin, M.; Xie, F.; Chen, H.; Yang, X.; Ye, F.; Bi, E.; Wu, Y.; Cai, M.; Han, L. Annealing-Free Perovskite Films by Instant Crystallization for Efficient Solar Cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 8548–8553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ahn, N.; Son, D.-Y.; Jang, I.-H.; Kang, S.M.; Choi, M.; Park, N.-G. Highly Reproducible Perovskite Solar Cells with Average Efficiency of 18.3% and Best Efficiency of 19.7% Fabricated via Lewis Base Adduct of Lead(II) Iodide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 8696–8699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yu, Y.; Yang, S.; Lei, L.; Cao, Q.; Shao, J.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Y. Ultrasmooth Perovskite Film via Mixed Anti-Solvent Strategy with Improved Efficiency. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 3667–3676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Liu, M.; Johnston, M.B.; Snaith, H.J. Efficient Planar Heterojunction Perovskite Solar Cells by Vapour Deposition. Nature 2013, 501, 395–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shao, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wang, S.; Yan, Y.; Feng, Y.; Bian, J.; Shi, Y. Insight into the Interfacial Elastic Contact in Stacking Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 6, 1900157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gao, Y.; Wu, Y.; Lu, H.; Chen, C.; Liu, Y.; Bai, X.; Yang, L.; Yu, W.W.; Dai, Q.; Zhang, Y. CsPbBr3 Perovskite Nanoparticles as Additive for Environmentally Stable Perovskite Solar Cells with 20.46% Efficiency. Nano Energy 2019, 59, 517–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tian, Q.; Ding, G.; Cai, Y.; Li, Z.; Tang, X.; Xie, R.-J.; Gao, P. Enhanced Performance of Perovskite Solar Cells Loaded with Iodine-Rich CsPbI3 Quantum Dots. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 7535–7543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Q.; Zheng, W.; Wan, Q.; Liu, M.; Feng, X.; Kong, L.; Li, L. Confined Synthesis of Stable and Uniform CsPbBr3 Nanocrystals with High Quantum Yield up to 90% by High Temperature Solid-State Reaction. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2021, 9, 2002130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yao, Y.; Hang, P.; Wang, P.; Xu, L.; Cui, C.; Xie, J.; Xiao, K.; Li, G.; Lin, P.; Liu, S.; et al. CsPbBr3 Quantum Dots Assisted Crystallization of Solution-Processed Perovskite Films with Preferential Orientation for High Performance Perovskite Solar Cells. Nanotechnology 2020, 31, 085401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xiang, W. A Review on the Stability of Inorganic Metal Halide Perovskites: Challenges and Opportunities for Stable Solar Cells. Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 2090–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ma, X.; Chen, M.; Zheng, Z.; Bullen, D.; Wang, J.; Harrison, C.; Gratz, E.; Lin, Y.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Recycled Cathode Materials Enabled Superior Performance for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Joule 2021, 5, 2955–2970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, F.; Deng, X.; Qi, F.; Li, Z.; Liu, D.; Shen, D.; Qin, M.; Wu, S.; Lin, F.; Jang, S.-H.; et al. Regulating Surface Termination for Efficient Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells with Greater Than 23% Efficiency. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 20134–20142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, Z.; Guo, T.; Yuan, H.; Yu, L.; Zhao, R.; Deng, Z.; Zhang, J.; Liu, X.; Hu, Z.; Zhu, Y. Reconstruction of the (EMIm)xMA1−xPb[(BF4)xI1−x]3 Interlayer for Efficient and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yang, Z.; Dou, J.; Kou, S.; Dang, J.; Ji, Y.; Yang, G.; Wu, W.; Kuang, D.; Wang, M. Multifunctional Phosphorus-Containing Lewis Acid and Base Passivation Enabling Efficient and Moisture-Stable Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1910710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Khan, J.; Zhang, X.; Yuan, J.; Wang, Y.; Shi, G.; Patterson, R.; Shi, J.; Ling, X.; Hu, L.; Wu, T.; et al. Tuning the Surface-Passivating Ligand Anchoring Position Enables Phase Robustness in CsPbI3 Perovskite Quantum Dot Solar Cells. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 3322–3329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, Y.; Duan, J.; Zhang, J.; Huang, S.; Ou-Yang, W.; Bao, Q.; Sun, Z.; Chen, X. High Efficiency and Stability of Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells Using Phenethyl Ammonium Iodide-Modified Interface of NiOx and Perovskite Layers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 771–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jiang, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yang, X.; Chen, Y.; Chu, Z.; Ye, Q.; Li, X.; Yin, Z.; You, J. Surface Passivation of Perovskite Film for Efficient Solar Cells. Nat. Photonics 2019, 13, 460–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Song, J.; Li, J.; Li, X.; Xu, L.; Dong, Y.; Zeng, H. Quantum Dot Light-Emitting Diodes Based on Inorganic Perovskite Cesium Lead Halides (CsPbX3). Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 7162–7167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bag, S.; Durstock, M.F. Large Perovskite Grain Growth in Low-Temperature Solution-Processed Planar p-i-n Solar Cells by Sodium Addition. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 5053–5057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chen, R.; Xu, Y.; Wang, S.; Xia, C.; Liu, Y.; Yu, B.; Xuan, T.; Li, H. Zinc Ions Doped Cesium Lead Bromide Perovskite Nanocrystals with Enhanced Efficiency and Stability for White Light-Emitting Diodes. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 866, 158969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ran, C.; Xi, J.; Gao, W.; Yuan, F.; Lei, T.; Jiao, B.; Hou, X.; Wu, Z. Bilateral Interface Engineering toward Efficient 2D–3D Bulk Heterojunction Tin Halide Lead-Free Perovskite Solar Cells. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 713–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liao, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhou, W.; Yang, D.; Shang, Y.; Shi, Z.; Li, B.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, L.; Quan, L.N.; et al. Highly Oriented Low-Dimensional Tin Halide Perovskites with Enhanced Stability and Photovoltaic Performance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 6693–6699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Xu, W.; Zhu, T.; Wu, H.; Liu, L.; Gong, X. Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Diacrylate as the Passivation Layer for High-Performance Perovskite Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 45045–45055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Shao, Y.; Xiao, Z.; Bi, C.; Yuan, Y.; Huang, J. Origin and Elimination of Photocurrent Hysteresis by Fullerene Passivation in CH3NH3PbI3 Planar Heterojunction Solar Cells. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pu, Y.-C.; Fan, H.-C.; Liu, T.-W.; Chen, J.-W. Methylamine Lead Bromide Perovskite/Protonated Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanocomposites: Interfacial Charge Carrier Dynamics and Photocatalysis. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 25438–25449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ren, M.; Cao, S.; Zhao, J.; Zou, B.; Zeng, R. Advances and Challenges in Two-Dimensional Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Perovskites Toward High-Performance Light-Emitting Diodes. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021, 13, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xu, L.; Liu, G.; Xiang, H.; Wang, R.; Shan, Q.; Yuan, S.; Cai, B.; Li, Z.; Li, W.; Zhang, S.; et al. Charge-Carrier Dynamics and Regulation Strategies in Perovskite Light-Emitting Diodes: From Materials to Devices. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2022, 9, 021308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fu, S.; Li, X.; Wan, L.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Y.; Bao, Q.; Fang, J. Efficient Passivation with Lead Pyridine-2-Carboxylic for High-Performance and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1901852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wieliczka, B.M.; Márquez, J.A.; Bothwell, A.M.; Zhao, Q.; Moot, T.; VanSant, K.T.; Ferguson, A.J.; Unold, T.; Kuciauskas, D.; Luther, J.M. Probing the Origin of the Open Circuit Voltage in Perovskite Quantum Dot Photovoltaics. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 19334–19344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sun, H.; Zhang, J.; Gan, X.; Yu, L.; Yuan, H.; Shang, M.; Lu, C.; Hou, D.; Hu, Z.; Zhu, Y.; et al. Pb-Reduced CsPb0.9Zn0.1I2 Br Thin Films for Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1900896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Guo, H.; Pei, Y.; Zhang, J.; Cai, C.; Zhou, K.; Zhu, Y. Doping with SnBr2 in CsPbBr3 to Enhance the Efficiency of All-Inorganic Perovskite Solar Cells. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 11234–11243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, W.; Wu, Y.; Yue, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, W.; Yang, X.; Chen, H.; Bi, E.; Ashraful, I.; Grätzel, M.; et al. Efficient and Stable Large-Area Perovskite Solar Cells with Inorganic Charge Extraction Layers. Science 2015, 350, 944–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Varache, R.; Leendertz, C.; Gueunier-Farret, M.E.; Haschke, J.; Muñoz, D.; Korte, L. Investigation of Selective Junctions Using a Newly Developed Tunnel Current Model for Solar Cell Applications. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2015, 141, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, X.; Zhang, W.; Guo, X.; Lu, C.; Wei, J.; Fang, J. Constructing Heterojunctions by Surface Sulfidation for Efficient Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells. Science 2022, 375, 434–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Liu, R.; Wang, J.; Mak, C.H.; Du, M.; Li, F.-F.; Shen, H.-H.; Santoso, S.P.; Yu, E.T.; Yu, X.; Chu, P.K.; et al. Optimizing Black Phosphorus/Halide Perovskite Compositions by Scanning Photoelectrochemical Microscopy. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2022, 169, 096510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Feng, Z.; Weng, C.; Hua, Y.; Chen, X.; Huang, S. Efficient and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells: The Effect of Octadecyl Ammonium Compound Side-Chain. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 475, 146498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lu, R.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, D.; Guo, X.; Li, C. Highly Efficient (200) Oriented MAPbI3 Perovskite Solar Cells. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 433, 133845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kim, T.W.; Uchida, S.; Kim, M.; Cho, S.G.; Kim, S.J.; Kondo, T.; Segawa, H. Phase Control of Organometal Halide Perovskites for Development of Highly Efficient Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 21974–21981. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.2c22769 (accessed on 24 March 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Feng, Z.; Wu, Z.; Hua, Y.; Weng, C.; Chen, X.; Huang, S. Azadipyrromethene Dye-Assisted Defect Passivation for Efficient and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 14388–14399. Available online: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acsami.1c20923 (accessed on 24 March 2024). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Nguyen, M.H.; Kim, K.-S. Controlling the Grain Formation Process with Oleylamine and 4-Dimethylaminopyridine Additives for Efficient and Stable MAPbI3 Solar Cells. Mater. Today Chem. 2023, 34, 101799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hua, Y.; Feng, Z.; Weng, C.; Chen, X.; Huang, S. Reinforcing the Efficiency and Stability of Perovskite Solar Cells Using a Cesium Sulfate Additive. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2023, 34, 571. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10854-023-10008-6 (accessed on 24 March 2024). [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) TEM image and (b) PL spectra of as-prepared CsPbBr3 QDs (λex = 365 nm).
Figure 1. (a) TEM image and (b) PL spectra of as-prepared CsPbBr3 QDs (λex = 365 nm).
Coatings 14 00409 g001
Figure 2. XRD pattern of as-prepared CsPbBr3 QDs (PDF 18-0364).
Figure 2. XRD pattern of as-prepared CsPbBr3 QDs (PDF 18-0364).
Coatings 14 00409 g002
Figure 3. SEM morphologies of PFs fabricated under different modification conditions: (a) reference sample; (b) 0.2 μg/mL, (c) 2 μg/mL, and (d) 10 μg/mL CsPbBr3 QD doping; (e) jointly modified with 2 μg/mL CsPbBr3 QDs and 2 mg/mL PEAI.
Figure 3. SEM morphologies of PFs fabricated under different modification conditions: (a) reference sample; (b) 0.2 μg/mL, (c) 2 μg/mL, and (d) 10 μg/mL CsPbBr3 QD doping; (e) jointly modified with 2 μg/mL CsPbBr3 QDs and 2 mg/mL PEAI.
Coatings 14 00409 g003
Figure 4. (a) The XRD patterns and (b) the enlarged (110) diffraction peaks of PFs modified with different materials (PDF 97-023-8610).
Figure 4. (a) The XRD patterns and (b) the enlarged (110) diffraction peaks of PFs modified with different materials (PDF 97-023-8610).
Coatings 14 00409 g004
Figure 5. (a) Absorption spectra, (b) Tauc plots, (c) steady-state emission spectra, and (d) TRPL spectra of the reference sample, CsPbBr3 QD-doped sample, and CsPbBr3 QDs and PEAI jointly modified PFs on SiO2 substrate.
Figure 5. (a) Absorption spectra, (b) Tauc plots, (c) steady-state emission spectra, and (d) TRPL spectra of the reference sample, CsPbBr3 QD-doped sample, and CsPbBr3 QDs and PEAI jointly modified PFs on SiO2 substrate.
Coatings 14 00409 g005
Figure 6. XPS spectra of reference sample and perovskite films jointly modified with CsPbBr3 QDs + PEAI: (a) Pb 4f and (b) I 3d.
Figure 6. XPS spectra of reference sample and perovskite films jointly modified with CsPbBr3 QDs + PEAI: (a) Pb 4f and (b) I 3d.
Coatings 14 00409 g006
Figure 7. (a) Structural diagram of PSCs, schematic diagram of perovskite grains jointly modified with CsPbBr3 QDs and PEAI, (b) J-V curves of PSCs modified at different conditions, and (c) IPCE patterns.
Figure 7. (a) Structural diagram of PSCs, schematic diagram of perovskite grains jointly modified with CsPbBr3 QDs and PEAI, (b) J-V curves of PSCs modified at different conditions, and (c) IPCE patterns.
Coatings 14 00409 g007
Figure 8. (a) The structure of the electron-only device and (b) SCLC of perovskite film modified by different methods.
Figure 8. (a) The structure of the electron-only device and (b) SCLC of perovskite film modified by different methods.
Coatings 14 00409 g008
Figure 9. (a) Dark J-V curves and (b) EIS (dark condition, bias voltage -0.85 V) of PSCs modified at different conditions.
Figure 9. (a) Dark J-V curves and (b) EIS (dark condition, bias voltage -0.85 V) of PSCs modified at different conditions.
Coatings 14 00409 g009
Figure 10. Contact angles of (a) the reference and (b) CsPbBr3 QD and PEAI jointly modified PFs (deionized water); (c) steady-state maximum current output under 100 mW/cm2 simulating sunlight at the bias voltage of 0.78 V for the original PSCs and 0.91 V for the jointly modified cells; (d) aging curves of unpacked PSCs in air condition with a relative humidity of 40% and at RT.
Figure 10. Contact angles of (a) the reference and (b) CsPbBr3 QD and PEAI jointly modified PFs (deionized water); (c) steady-state maximum current output under 100 mW/cm2 simulating sunlight at the bias voltage of 0.78 V for the original PSCs and 0.91 V for the jointly modified cells; (d) aging curves of unpacked PSCs in air condition with a relative humidity of 40% and at RT.
Coatings 14 00409 g010
Table 1. The photovoltaic performances of PSCs obtained by different modification methods.
Table 1. The photovoltaic performances of PSCs obtained by different modification methods.
SampleVoc (V)Jsc (mA/cm2)FF (%)PCE (%)
ReferenceChampion 1.07
Average 1.06 ± 0.03
22.4
21.9 ± 0.82
71.6
70.1 ± 1.7
17.21
16.3 ± 1.1
0.2 μg/mL CsPbBr3 QDsChampion 1.11
Average 1.09 ± 0.02
22.7
22.4 ± 0.52
72.3
70.9 ± 1.7
18.22
17.6 ± 0.6
2 μg/mL CsPbBr3 QDsChampion 1.13
Average 1.11 ± 0.02
23.2
22.8 ± 0.55
76.6
75.8 ± 1.2
20.08
19.7 ± 0.5
10 μg/mL CsPbBr3 QDsChampion 1.12
Average 1.11 ± 0.02
22.8
22.5 ± 0.47
73.1
72.2 ± 1.2
18.67
18.1 ± 0.6
CsPbBr3 QDs +PEAIChampion 1.15
Average 1.14 ± 0.01
23.3
22.9 ± 0.56
78.6
77.2 ± 1.3
21.04
20.3 ± 0.7
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, S.; Chen, R.; Qu, M.; Long, B.; He, N.; Huang, S.; Chen, X.; Li, H.; Xuan, T. Dual Strategy Based on Quantum Dot Doping and Phenylethylamine Iodide Surface Modification for High-Performance and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells. Coatings 2024, 14, 409. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14040409

AMA Style

Zhang S, Chen R, Qu M, Long B, He N, Huang S, Chen X, Li H, Xuan T. Dual Strategy Based on Quantum Dot Doping and Phenylethylamine Iodide Surface Modification for High-Performance and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells. Coatings. 2024; 14(4):409. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14040409

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Shulan, Renjie Chen, Mujing Qu, Biyu Long, Nannan He, Sumei Huang, Xiaohong Chen, Huili Li, and Tongtong Xuan. 2024. "Dual Strategy Based on Quantum Dot Doping and Phenylethylamine Iodide Surface Modification for High-Performance and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells" Coatings 14, no. 4: 409. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14040409

APA Style

Zhang, S., Chen, R., Qu, M., Long, B., He, N., Huang, S., Chen, X., Li, H., & Xuan, T. (2024). Dual Strategy Based on Quantum Dot Doping and Phenylethylamine Iodide Surface Modification for High-Performance and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells. Coatings, 14(4), 409. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings14040409

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop