Next Article in Journal
Wear and Corrosion Resistance of Chromium–Vanadium Carbide Coatings Produced via Thermo-Reactive Deposition
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Surface Roughness and Electroless Ni–P Plating on the Bonding Strength of Bi–Te-based Thermoelectric Modules
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Brazing Temperature on the Microstructure and Chosen Properties of WC–10Ni/NiCrBSi Composite Coatings Produced by Vacuum Cladding from Flexible Coated Cloths

School of Materials Science and Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Techology, Zhenjiang 212003, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2019, 9(4), 214; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9040214
Submission received: 5 March 2019 / Revised: 24 March 2019 / Accepted: 25 March 2019 / Published: 27 March 2019

Abstract

:
Three kinds of WC–10Ni/NiCrBSi composite coatings were prepared on the surface of Q235 carbon steel at 1015, 1055, and 1095 °C by vacuum brazing. The microstructure and properties of the composite coatings were investigated. The results showed that various reaction layers appeared at the bonding area of the coatings and the substrate. As the brazing temperature increased, the reaction layer between the solder and the hard phase gradually decreased and disappeared at 1095 °C. Simultaneously, the size of gray-white massive phases with a large amount of W in the brazing layer decreased gradually. When the brazing temperature increased, the Fe content markedly increased in the reaction layer of the matrix and the solder, indicating that the increase in brazing temperature was beneficial for metallurgical bonding between the coating and the substrate. Interface bonding strength and wear resistance were enhanced by the increase in brazing temperature; however, the microhardness of the composite coating section decreased. The interface bonding strength reached 362.9 MPa and the wear loss reached a minimum at 1095 °C.

1. Introduction

The excellent surface properties of materials are of interest to many industries, including the aerospace and oil industries [1]. However, common surface methods for metal materials have their own disadvantages. For instance, thermal spray coatings and base metal bonds are mainly mechanically fitted, so their impact resistance is not great. Owing to uneven heating in the welding process, the temperature gradient in the surfacing welding process is large, leading to high welding stress, deformation, and even cracking. The strengthening thickness of gas-phase deposition coatings is relatively thin [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12].
The flexible “coated cloth” technology originated in the 1960s and 1970s and was invented by Goldsmith and Breton [13,14]. The main process involved in the flexible “coated cloth” technology is mixing of the powdery hard particles, the bonding metal, and the organic binder with a stirring device. The hard particle powder and the binder metal powder are then wrapped in an organic binder by other molding processes, thereby producing a material with good flexibility. Lu prepared an NiCrBSi/WC–Co wear-resistant composite coating by combining vacuum brazing technology with flexible “coated cloth” technology. By analyzing the microstructure of this “coated cloth”, he believed that the organic binder formed a staggered spider web structure under the repeated extrusion of the rolls, and the granular powder was embedded in it [15]. Tan studied the effect of brazing processes on the properties of the WC “coated cloth” layer, finding that the wear resistance of the coating increased with an increase in brazing temperature, but the resistance decreased when the brazing temperature exceeded 1080 °C [16]. In general, coatings prepared by a combination of vacuum cladding and flexible “coated cloth” technology have a characteristic low internal stress, controllable thickness, higher surface hardness, and better wear resistance. At the same time, flexible metal cloth can overcome the problems of complicated structures and the location of the workpiece [17,18,19].
In this paper, based on the research status and development trend of cemented carbide coatings at home and abroad [20], WC–NiCrBSi composite coatings were prepared on the surface of substrate Q235 by combining vacuum brazing technology and flexible “coated cloth” technology. The effect of changing the brazing temperature on the coating was studied by examining the microstructure and properties of coatings after vacuum cladding, to understand the engineering applications of this type of coating.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Coating Preparation Process

The base material was Q235 carbon steel (70 mm × 30 mm × 5 mm) and its mechanical characteristics are shown in Table 1. Nickel-coated tungsten carbide WC–10Ni powders were used as the hard phase in the composite coating, in two sizes of 30–45 μm and 5–15 μm. The WC–10Ni powders were prepared by sintering agglomerates of WC particles and Ni. NiCrBSi powders of type BNi-2 (Table 2) were selected as solder and their solidus and liquidus temperatures were 917 and 999 °C, respectively, and the powder diameter was less than 45 μm. The microscopic morphology of WC–10Ni powder and WC BNi-2 powder is shown in Figure 1. PTFE powder was used as the binder phase in the “metal cloth” rolling process.
Preparation of the “coated cloths” was divided into three steps: the first step was to mix the three different powders with a QM-5 roller mill for 5 h according to the proportion shown in Table 3; the second step was to roll the mixed powders repeatedly into a 1 mm thick “Carbide cloth” and “Solder cloth”, which are shown in Figure 2; and the third step was to cut the cloths to the size of 70 mm × 30 mm.
In this test, a WZB-20 vacuum brazing furnace (Zhongshan, China) was adopted. Before brazing, the surface of the Q235 steel was ground with water-abrasive papers and then ultrasonically cleaned in an acetone solution and dried. The sample assembly method is shown in Figure 3. Three vacuum brazing temperatures were used in the test for comparison, which were 1015, 1055, and 1095 °C. The vacuum degree during brazing was not less than 2 × 10−3 Pa, and the brazing process curve is shown in Figure 4. Three metallographic samples of 15 mm × 5 mm were removed from each sample after brazing.

2.2. Micromorphology Characterizations

The cross-sectional morphology of the coating was observed by means of a Zeiss Axioskop2 metallographic microscope (Oberkochen, Germany). Punctual and linear elemental analyses were performed on the characteristic areas of the coating cross-section with a JSM-6480 scanning electron microscope with an energy spectrum analyzer (Kyoto, Japan). The side face of the sample was analyzed by an XRD-6000 X-ray diffractometer (Tokyo, Japan) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å).

2.3. Hardness and Shear Test

The bonding strength of the coating interface was tested with a CMT5205 electronic universal testing machine (Zhuhai, China) and a self-designed cutting fixture. The test schematic is shown in Figure 5a. The size of the shear sample is 4 mm × 10 mm × 7 mm and each coating was tested five times. The microhardness of different depths of the coating section was tested with a KB 30S FA BASIC automatic hardness tester (Hochdorf-Assenheim, Germany), the test load was 200 gf, and the load time was 20 s. The test schematic for this is shown in Figure 5b.

2.4. Wear Resistance Test

In order to quantify the wear resistance of coatings, 1 mm of the coating surface was removed and a HT-1000 high temperature friction and wear tester (Lanzhou, China) was used. The specific test parameters were as follows: the test temperature was room temperature; the friction pair was a Si3N4 ceramic ball of 5 mm in diameter; the load applied in the test was 20 N; the rotational speed of the grinding disc was 600 r/min; the wear radius was 4 mm; and the wear time was 1 h. In order to obtain accurate data, each coating was tested five times.

3. Results

3.1. Microstructure

Figure 6a shows the microstructure of the coating with a soldering temperature of 1055 °C. In the process of brazing, the NiCrBSi solder liquefied, while the WC particles did not decompose. Due to the density of WC being higher than that of the NiCrBSi and the gravity of WC, the WC settled downward and accumulated in areas near the brazing layer. As the brazing temperature increased, the fluidity of the solder increased, and thus the WC particles could sink further into the liquid solder, leading to the increasing amount of liquid solder without WC particles above the coating. As can be seen in Figure 6b, these liquid solders flowed to the back of the sample due to the lack of support from the WC particles.

3.2. Interface Morphology and Element Distribution

The microstructures of the bonding area of the coatings and substrate brazed at 1015, 1055, and 1095 °C are shown in Figure 7. The circular vesicular structure in Figure 7 is the WC particles, and the area around the WC particles is filled with an Ni-based solid solution and compound. As can be seen from Figure 7, this study divided the section into four different reaction layers: Layer I was the “hard layer” composed of gray Ni-based solid solutions and bright white vesicular WC particles; layer II was the reaction layer of the hard phase and the solder, composed of Ni-based solid solutions, WC particles, and gray-white massive phases; layer III was the reaction layer of the matrix and the solder, composed of Ni-based solid solutions and gray-white massive phases, with almost no WC particles; and layer IV was the Q235 matrix. Comparing Figure 7a–c, it was found that layer II became narrower with the increase in brazing temperature, disappearing at 1095 °C.
As the brazing temperature increased, the fluidity of the liquid solder also increased. The pores generated by the high-temperature volatilization of the binder added during the “solder cloth” preparation process allowed for better overflow, and the size as well as the number of pores in layer III gradually decreased. Obviously, the increase of brazing temperature caused the size of the gray-white massive phases to become smaller.
In order to further study the influence of different brazing temperatures on the interface structure of the coating, seven characteristic regions were analyzed by EDS. The characteristic regions B, D, and F were located at Ni-based solid solutions in layer III on the samples prepared at different brazing temperatures, and A, C, E, and G were located at the gray-white massive phases in layer III on these samples. As can be seen in Table 4, the characteristic regions B, D, and F were mainly composed of Ni and a little of Fe, Si, and Cr. According to the phase diagram of the Ni–Cr and Fe–Ni binary alloys, the regions were composed of γ-Ni(Fe,Cr) and α-Ni(Si) solid solution phase. Comparing the characteristic regions B, D, and F, it was found that as the brazing temperature increased, the Fe content increased significantly.
The WC particles used in the test were WC–10Ni, and the 10% Ni added in the hard layer diluted the melting elements Si and B in the solder. Simultaneously, the presence of WC–10Ni in the “Carbide cloth” compared to the “Solder cloth” resulted in a difference in elemental density between them. In the vacuum brazing process, due to the high content of the melting element in the “solder cloth”, a large amount of Si and B diffused from the interface between the “carbide cloth” and “solder cloth” into the hard layer in order to achieve the balance of the element concentration in the coating, and the side of the interface near the “carbide cloth” became the “output end” of Si and B, resulting in a significant decrease in the melting point of the side. The melting point of WC is 2870 °C, so the separate WC particles did not undergo any transformation under vacuum conditions of 1100 °C, but they may form a dissolution after mixing with the metal matrix [21,22]. The affinity of Cr to C was higher than that of W and C, and W in WC could be preferentially replaced. Therefore, Cr in NiCrBSi was also a cause of dissolution of WC and this dissolution led to the generation of the gray-white massive phase. The characteristic areas A, C, E, and G (gray-white massive phases) were composed of a large number of W, some Cr and Ni, and a small amount of Si and Fe. A large amount of W content caused the hardness of these phases to be high, leading to a decrease in the bond strength at the bonding surface of the substrate coating. With the increase in brazing temperature, the content of Cr in gray-white massive phases decreased, the content of W increased greatly, and its size decreased gradually, which improved the toughness between the Q235 substrate and coating.
The line scan of the elements at HI, JK, and LM in Figure 7 was performed by EDS, and the results are shown in Figure 8a–c. Cr was mainly distributed in the gray-white massive phases formed after WC dissolution. With the increase in brazing temperature, the content of the gray-white phases decreased, and the distribution of Cr became relatively uniform. It is notable that Si has the same distribution tend as W. This is because the Si in the NiCrBSi was diffusing into and accumulating in the WC particles when it was melted. Subsequently, in the process of heat preservation, due to the crystallization of the isothermal solidification, part of the γ-Ni solution without Si formed and the remaining liquid with Si non-isothermally curdled. During the brazing process, the Fe in the matrix dissolved and diffused, forming a metallurgical belt with the interface, which formed a strong metallurgical bond between the coating and the matrix. However, due to the large atomic radius of Fe, the diffusion distance was limited, thus the Fe was distributed like a cliff after undergoing the metallurgical bond. The increase in brazing temperature increased the diffusion coefficient of the element, causing more Fe to dissolve and diffuse, and it was found from Figure 8 that the Fe content in layer III markedly increased when the brazing temperature increased. Therefore, the increase in brazing temperature was beneficial for the metallurgical bonding between the coating and the substrate.

3.3. Phase Composition of Composite Coating

The cross-section of the sample which contains the surface layer, hardened layer, and Q235 substrate layer with a brazing temperature of 1055 °C was analyzed by X-ray diffraction. As shown in Figure 9, the composite coating contained WC, α-Fe, and γ-Ni solid solution, and a small amount of Ni3Si phase. The γ-Ni solid solution played a supporting role to WC in the coating, and the Ni3Si phase that was dispersed in the coating dispersion strengthened the coating.

3.4. Microhardness of Composite Coating Sections

The microhardness value curves of the three different brazing temperature coating sections at different depths are shown in Figure 10. The microhardness of the composite coatings section showed the shape of a peak that first increased then decreased from the substrate to the surface layer. By comparison, the microhardness of the hardened layer was higher than that of the substrate, which is about six to seven times that of the substrate. Due to the non-uniformity of WC particle distribution in the hard layer, in the microhardness test, the hardness tester head might have been on the WC particles, causing the microhardness value to fluctuate. At the interface, there was mainly a nickel-based solid solution with some iron elements in the substrate dissolved in it, which was a soft single crystal structure with low hardness that played a good transition between the hard layer and substrate and improved the bonding strength of the coating interface. It can be seen from Figure 10 that as the brazing temperature increased, the microhardness of the interface decreased. This was due to the following: the rise in temperature which increased the diffusion coefficient of the alloying elements Si and B; the increased amount of Fe that dissolved and diffused towards the interface in the matrix; and the brittleness at the interface that was reduced, thereby reducing the hardness.

3.5. Bonding Strength between the Coating and Substrate

In order to study the bonding strength between the WC–NiCrBSi coating and matrix at different brazing temperatures, the specimen was subjected to a shear test. The results are shown in Figure 11. The interfacial shear strength values of the three coatings were 270.2, 336.7, and 362.9 MPa. The results indicated that metallurgical bonding was formed between the coating and the matrix. The increase in brazing temperature improved the fluidity of the liquid solder and its wettability to the matrix, reduced the segregation of the alloying elements, made the solidification process of the interface more uniform, and effectively reduced the formation of interfacial pores and brittle compounds. The stress concentration regions formed by these pores and brittle compounds were reduced, and the bonding strength at the coating interface was improved.

3.6. Wear Resistance of Composite Coating

The wear resistance of the composite coating surface was not only related to the content of the hard-phase WC particles in the coating, but also to the bonding strength between the WC particles and the solder. As shown in Figure 12, under the same test conditions, the wear of the matrix was 2.7–4.6 times that of the three brazing temperature coatings. When the brazing temperature reached 1095 °C, the grinding loss of the sample was 3.3 mg, which was the lowest. The increase in brazing temperature was beneficial to the diffusion of the alloying elements into the WC particles, so the microstructure in the coating was more uniform. The degree of metallurgical bonding strength between the WC particles and the NiCrBSi solder increased, resulting in an increase in the resistance of the WC particles being peeled off and an increase in the wear resistance of the coating.

4. Conclusions

  • Three kinds of WC–10Ni/NiCrBSi composite coatings were prepared on the surface of Q235 carbon steel at 1015, 1055, and 1095 °C by vacuum brazing. Various reaction layers appeared at the bonding area of the coatings and the substrate. With the increase in brazing temperature, the reaction layer between the solder and the hard phase gradually decreased and disappeared at 1095 °C. Simultaneously, the size of gray-white massive phases with a large amount of W in the brazing layer decreased gradually.
  • When the brazing temperature increased, the Fe content markedly increased in the reaction layer of the matrix and the solder. This indicated that the increase in brazing temperature was beneficial to metallurgical bonding between the coating and the matrix.
  • Interface bonding strength and wear resistance were enhanced by the increase in brazing temperature. However, the microhardness of the composite coating section decreased. The interface bonding strength reached 362.9 MPa and the wear loss reached a minimum at 1095 °C.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.X.; Methodology, X.X. and H.D.; Validation, X.X., H.D., J.Z. and C.X.; Formal Analysis, X.X. and H.D.; Investigation, X.X., Y.W., H.D. and C.X.; Resources, J.Z.; Data Curation, X.X.; Writing–Original Draft Preparation, X.X. and H.D.; Writing–Review and Editing, J.Z. and C.X.; Supervision, J.Z. and C.X.; Project Administration, J.Z., X.X. and C.X.; Data Curation, X.X.; Resources, X.X. and J.Z.; Visualization, J.Z. and C.X.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nahvi, S.M.; Jafari, M. Microstructural and mechanical properties of advanced HVOF-sprayed WC-based cermet coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2016, 286, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, L.; Xu, H.; Xiao, J.; Wei, X.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, C. Effect of heat treatment on structure and property evolutions of atmospheric plasma sprayed NiCrBSi coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 325, 548–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vashishtha, N.; Khatirkar, R.K.; Sapate, S.G. Tribological behaviour of HVOF sprayed WC–12Co, WC–10Co–4Cr and Cr3C2−25NiCr coatings. Tribol. Int. 2017, 105, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Huang, S.; Sun, D.; Xu, D.; Wang, W.; Xu, H. Microstructures and Properties of NiCrBSi/WC Biomimetic Coatings Prepared by Plasma Spray Welding. J. Bionic Eng. 2015, 12, 592–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bartkowski, D.; Bartkowska, A. Wear resistance in the soil of Stellite-6/WC coatings produced using laser cladding method. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2017, 64, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Alidokht, S.A.; Manimunda, P.; Vo, P.; Yue, S.; Chromik, R.R. Cold spray deposition of a Ni–WC composite coating and its dry sliding wear behavior. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2016, 308, 424–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, X.P.; Liu, Q.M.; Xia, C.Z.; Zou, J.S. Microstructure and properties of Si3N4 ceramics and 304 stainless steel brazed joint with Cu/Ag-Cu/Ti laminated filler metal. High Temp. Proc. 2018, 37, 597–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Deschuyteneer, D.; Petit, F.; Gonon, M.; Cambier, F. Processing and characterization of laser clad NiCrBSi/WC composite coatings-Influence of microstructure on hardness and wear. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2015, 283, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dariusz, B.; Grzegorz, K. Microstructure and wear resistance of Stellite-6/WC MMC coatings produced by laser cladding using Yb: YAG disk laser. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2016, 58, 157–164. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zou, J.S.; Jiang, Z.G.; Zhao, Q.Z.; Chen, Z. Brazing of Si3N4 with amorphous Ti40Zr25Ni15Cu20 filler. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2009, 507, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xia, C.; Sun, W.; Zhou, Y.; Xu, X. Thermal fatigue damage and residual mechanical properties of W–Cu/Ag–Cu/1Cr18Ni9 brazed joint. J. Alloy. Compd. 2018, 741, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zou, J.; Liu, R.; Wang, L. Influence of Alloying Elements on Properties of Ti–Ni–Cu Brazing Alloys. Rare Met. Mater. Eng. 2010, 39, 1023–1026. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bailey, J.; Worden, D.; Breton, E.; Wolf, J. Coating metallic substrate with powdered filler and molten metal. U.S. Patent 3743556, 3 July 1973. [Google Scholar]
  14. Goldsmith, R. Method of preparing microporous tetrafluoroethylene resin sheets. U.S. Patent 3281511A, 25 October 1966. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lu, S.; Dong, X.; Wu, Q.; Guo, Y.; Xu, X.; Zhu, Z. Preparation of NiCrBSi–WC wear-resistant brazing coatings. J. Met. 1999, 35, 83–85. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tan, B.; Zhao, B.; Fan, J.; Gao, P. Study on the properties of WC “metal cloth” brazing wear layer by brazing temperature. Ordnance Mater. Sci. Eng. 2003, 254, 421–428. [Google Scholar]
  17. Li, H.; Jia, Y.; Xuan, F. Preparation and performance of gradient WC reinforced NiCrBSi alloy coating based on flexible metallic cloth technique. Mech. Eng. Mater. 2018, 42, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhou, S.; Lei, J.; Dai, X.; Guo, J.; Gu, Z.; Pan, H. A comparative study of the structure and wear resistance of NiCrBSi/50 wt.% WC composite coatings by laser cladding and laser induction hybrid cladding. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2016, 60, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Grunder, T.; Piquerez, A.; Bach, M.; Mille, P. Residual Stress in Brazing of Submicron Al2O3 to WC–Co. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2016, 25, 2914–2921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pascal, D.T.; Şerban, V.A.; Marginean, G. Optimization of process parameters for the manufacturing of high temperature vacuum brazed WC–NiCrBSi Coatings. Solid State Phenom. 2016, 254, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ortiz, A.; García, A.; Cadenas, M.; Fernández, M.R.; Cuetos, J.M. WC particles distribution model in the cross-section of laser cladded NiCrBSi + WC coatings, for different wt % WC. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2017, 324, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ramirez, C.; Ismail, A.I.; Gendarme, C.; Dehmas, M.; Aeby-Gautier, E.; Poulachon, G.; Rossi, F. Understanding the diffusion wear mechanisms of WC–10%Co carbide tools during dry machining of titanium alloys. Wear 2017, 390, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Microscopic morphology of various powders: (a) 30–45 μm WC–10Ni, (b) 5–15 μm WC–10Ni, and (c) BNi2.
Figure 1. Microscopic morphology of various powders: (a) 30–45 μm WC–10Ni, (b) 5–15 μm WC–10Ni, and (c) BNi2.
Coatings 09 00214 g001
Figure 2. (a) Macro appearance of metal cloth; (b) microscopic morphology of “Solder cloth”; (c) microscopic morphology of “Carbide cloth”.
Figure 2. (a) Macro appearance of metal cloth; (b) microscopic morphology of “Solder cloth”; (c) microscopic morphology of “Carbide cloth”.
Coatings 09 00214 g002aCoatings 09 00214 g002b
Figure 3. Sample assembly method.
Figure 3. Sample assembly method.
Coatings 09 00214 g003
Figure 4. Welding process curve.
Figure 4. Welding process curve.
Coatings 09 00214 g004
Figure 5. (a) Shear test schematic; (b) microhardness test diagram.
Figure 5. (a) Shear test schematic; (b) microhardness test diagram.
Coatings 09 00214 g005
Figure 6. (a) Micromorphology of the coating with a soldering temperature of 1055 °C; (b) The front and back morphology of samples.
Figure 6. (a) Micromorphology of the coating with a soldering temperature of 1055 °C; (b) The front and back morphology of samples.
Coatings 09 00214 g006
Figure 7. Microstructures of the bonding area of the coatings and substrate brazed at different temperatures: (a) 1015 °C, (b) 1055 °C, and (c) 1095 °C.
Figure 7. Microstructures of the bonding area of the coatings and substrate brazed at different temperatures: (a) 1015 °C, (b) 1055 °C, and (c) 1095 °C.
Coatings 09 00214 g007
Figure 8. Element distribution at the brazed interface: (a) 1015 °C; (b) 1055 °C; and (c) 1095 °C.
Figure 8. Element distribution at the brazed interface: (a) 1015 °C; (b) 1055 °C; and (c) 1095 °C.
Coatings 09 00214 g008aCoatings 09 00214 g008b
Figure 9. Cross-sectional XRD of the 1055 °C composite coating.
Figure 9. Cross-sectional XRD of the 1055 °C composite coating.
Coatings 09 00214 g009
Figure 10. Microhardness of the composite coatings section.
Figure 10. Microhardness of the composite coatings section.
Coatings 09 00214 g010
Figure 11. Shear strength of three coatings.
Figure 11. Shear strength of three coatings.
Coatings 09 00214 g011
Figure 12. Wear loss of the coating and matrix surface.
Figure 12. Wear loss of the coating and matrix surface.
Coatings 09 00214 g012
Table 1. Mechanical characteristics of Q235 carbon steel.
Table 1. Mechanical characteristics of Q235 carbon steel.
MaterialDensity (cm3)Elastic Modulus (GPa)Poisson’s RatioTensile Strength (MPa)Yield Strength (MPa)
Q2357.85200–2100.25–0.33370–500235
Table 2. Chemical composition of BNi-2 (wt.%).
Table 2. Chemical composition of BNi-2 (wt.%).
Chemical CompositionCrBSiCFePNi
Mass fraction6.0–8.02.75–3.54.0–5.00.062.5–3.50.0279.92–84.67
Table 3. Proportion of components in the metal cloth.
Table 3. Proportion of components in the metal cloth.
Metal Cloth TypeWC–10Ni (5–15 μm)WC–10Ni (30–45 μm)NiCrBSiPTFE
carbide cloth3340.16
solder cloth100.16
Table 4. Composition of points marked in Figure 8.
Table 4. Composition of points marked in Figure 8.
Representative PointsElemental Composition(wt.%)
SiCrFeNiW
A5.022.81.427.843.1
C5.121.20.725.647.4
E7.911.11.715.563.8
G9.07.12.113.468.5
B9.27.37.176.3
D8.85.616.369.4
F8.65.519.666.3

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, X.; Ding, H.; Xia, C.; Zou, J.; Wang, Y. Effect of Brazing Temperature on the Microstructure and Chosen Properties of WC–10Ni/NiCrBSi Composite Coatings Produced by Vacuum Cladding from Flexible Coated Cloths. Coatings 2019, 9, 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9040214

AMA Style

Xu X, Ding H, Xia C, Zou J, Wang Y. Effect of Brazing Temperature on the Microstructure and Chosen Properties of WC–10Ni/NiCrBSi Composite Coatings Produced by Vacuum Cladding from Flexible Coated Cloths. Coatings. 2019; 9(4):214. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9040214

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Xiangping, Hengnan Ding, Chunzhi Xia, Jiasheng Zou, and Yi Wang. 2019. "Effect of Brazing Temperature on the Microstructure and Chosen Properties of WC–10Ni/NiCrBSi Composite Coatings Produced by Vacuum Cladding from Flexible Coated Cloths" Coatings 9, no. 4: 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings9040214

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop