Next Article in Journal
The Evolution of Molybdenum Dependent Nitrogenase in Cyanobacteria
Previous Article in Journal
Oxygen Dependence of Flight Performance in Ageing Drosophila melanogaster
 
 
biology-logo
Article Menu
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Haslea silbo, A Novel Cosmopolitan Species of Blue Diatoms

by
Romain Gastineau
1,*,
Gert Hansen
2,
Michel Poulin
3,
Claude Lemieux
4,
Monique Turmel
4,
Jean-François Bardeau
5,
Vincent Leignel
6,
Yann Hardivillier
6,
Michèle Morançais
7,
Joël Fleurence
7,
Pierre Gaudin
8,
Vona Méléder
7,
Eileen J. Cox
9,
Nikolaï A. Davidovich
1,10,
Olga I. Davidovich
10,
Andrzej Witkowski
1,
Irena Kaczmarska
11,
James M. Ehrman
12,
Emilio Soler Onís
13,
Antera Martel Quintana
14,
Maja Mucko
15,
Solenn Mordret
16,
Diana Sarno
16,
Boris Jacquette
5,
Charlotte Falaise
6,
Julie Séveno
6,
Niels L. Lindquist
17,
Philip S. Kemp, Jr.
18,
Elif Eker-Develi
19,
Merve Konucu
19,20 and
Jean-Luc Mouget
6
add Show full author list remove Hide full author list
1
Institute of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of Szczecin, Mickiewicza 16a, 70-383 Szczecin, Poland
2
Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 4, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
3
Research and Collections, Canadian Museum of Nature, P.O. Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, ON K1P 6P4, Canada
4
Département de biochimie, de microbiologie et de Bio-Informatique, Institut de Biologie Intégrative et des Systèmes, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
5
Institut des Molécules et Matériaux du Mans (IMMM UMR 6283), Le Mans Université, Avenue Olivier Messiaen, CEDEX 9, 72085 Le Mans, France
6
FR CNRS 3473 IUML, Mer-Molécules-Santé (MMS, EA 2160), Le Mans Université, Avenue Olivier Messiaen, CEDEX 9, 72085 Le Mans, France
7
FR CNRS 3473 IUML, Mer-Molécules-Santé (MMS, EA 2160), Université de Nantes, 2 rue de la Houssinière, CEDEX 3, 44322 Nantes, France
8
UMR 6112 CNRS LPG, Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géosciences, Nantes Université, 2 rue de la Houssinière, CEDEX 3, 44322 Nantes, France
9
The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK
10
Karadag Scientific Station–Natural Reserve of the Russian Academy of Sciences, p/o Kurortnoe, Feodosiya, 98188 Crimea, Russia
11
Department of Biology, Mount Allison University, Sackville, NB E4L 1G7, Canada
12
Digital Microscopy Facility, Mount Allison University, Sackville, NB E4L 1G7, Canada
13
Observatorio Canario de Algas Nocivas (OCHABs), Parque Científico Tecnólogico Marino de Taliarte (FPCT-ULPGC), c/ Miramar, 121 Taliarte, 35214 Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain
14
Banco Español de Algas (BEA), Instituto de Oceanografía y Cambio Global (IOCAG), Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ULPGC), Muelle de Taliarte s/n, 35214 Telde, Islas Canarias, Spain
15
Faculty of Science, Biology Department, University of Zagreb, Rooseveltov trg 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
16
Department of Research Infrastructure for Marine Biological Resources, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, 80121 Naples, Italy
17
Institute of Marine Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Morehead City, NC 28557, USA
18
Kemp Fisheries LLC, 2333 Shore Drive, Morehead City, NC 28557, USA
19
Institute of Graduate Studies in Science, Department of Biotechnology, Mersin University, Ciftlikkoy, Mersin 33343, Turkey
20
BW24-Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, B9000 Gent, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2021, 10(4), 328; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10040328
Submission received: 23 March 2021 / Revised: 9 April 2021 / Accepted: 10 April 2021 / Published: 14 April 2021

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Diatoms are microalgae known for their ecological importance. Among them, just a few species are able to produce a blue pigment. We describe Haslea silbo sp. nov., a cosmopolitan species of blue diatoms, found on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. The description includes the use of both microscopy and next generation sequencing. It has been possible to observe its reproduction in the laboratory, and the blue pigment it produces has also been studied.

Abstract

Specimens of a new species of blue diatoms from the genus Haslea Simonsen were discovered in geographically distant sampling sites, first in the Canary Archipelago, then North Carolina, Gulf of Naples, the Croatian South Adriatic Sea, and Turkish coast of the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. An exhaustive characterization of these specimens, using a combined morphological and genomic approach led to the conclusion that they belong to a single new to science cosmopolitan species, Haslea silbo sp. nov. A preliminary characterization of its blue pigment shows similarities to marennine produced by Haslea ostrearia, as evidenced by UV–visible spectrophotometry and Raman spectrometry. Life cycle stages including auxosporulation were also observed, providing data on the cardinal points of this species. For the two most geographically distant populations (North Carolina and East Mediterranean), complete mitochondrial and plastid genomes were sequenced. The mitogenomes of both strains share a rare atp6 pseudogene, but the number, nature, and positions of the group II introns inside its cox1 gene differ between the two populations. There are also two pairs of genes fused in single ORFs. The plastid genomes are characterized by large regions of recombination with plasmid DNA, which are in both cases located between the ycf35 and psbA genes, but whose content differs between the strains. The two sequenced strains hosts three plasmids coding for putative serine recombinase protein whose sequences are compared, and four out of six of these plasmids were highly conserved.

1. Introduction

Diatoms able to synthetize blue marennine-like pigments are restricted to a few species belonging to the genus Haslea, the most famous being H. ostrearia (Gaillon) Simonsen [1,2]. The naming of blue diatoms or blue Haslea comes from their remarkable ability to synthesize water soluble, blue-green, non-photosynthetic pigments, commonly called marennine-like pigments [3]. Marennine is responsible for the greening of oyster gills in Western Europe [4,5,6,7]. Marennine and marennine-like pigments also display several biological activities (e.g., antibacterial, antiviral, or antioxidant) qualifying them for putative use in aquaculture and biotechnology [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18].
Since its initial description as Vibrio ostrearius Gaillon (1820), then Navicula ostrearia (Gaillon) Bory (1824), H. ostrearia was believed to be the only species producing a blue pigment and was considered to be distributed worldwide [2,19,20]. Three other species of blue Haslea were recently discovered, and formally described, including Haslea karagadensis Davidovich, Gastineau and Mouget [19] in the Black Sea, Haslea provincialis Gastineau, Hansen and Mouget [21] on the French coast of the Mediterranean Sea, and Haslea nusantara Mouget, Gastineau and Syakti [22] in the Java Sea. Haslea karadagensis, H. provincialis, and H. nusantara are morphologically similar to H. ostrearia. Although these four species are easily confused based on light microscopy (LM), they show significant differences in stria densities that are only visible using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) [19,21,22]. Furthermore, they are unambiguously distinguished by molecular barcoding and phylogeny [19,21,22]. Interbreeding experiments were unsuccessful at triggering auxosporulation between strains of these blue Haslea species, suggesting they belong to different taxa according to the concept of biological species [19,21,23].
In 2009, we observed blue diatoms in water samples from La Gomera, an island from the Canary Archipelago. Based on their morphology, they appeared to belong to a new species thereafter called Haslea silbo sp. nov. Several subsequent findings suggested that this species is a cosmopolitan taxon found in different geographic locations on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. Preliminary characterization of this species and its blue pigment were done in the past [3], without the formal description being provided. Here, we present data collected during a decade of research on Haslea silbo sp. nov. These studies include the formal description of this new species, physico-chemical analyses of the blue pigment, evidence for auxosporulation, a molecular phylogeny as well as a genomic comparison of two sub-populations based on the sequencing of complete organellar genomes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation and Culture of Algae

Water samples were collected from the Canary Islands (Spain) at San Sebastián de La Gomera (28°05′ N; 17°06′ W) on February 2009. One mL of water sample and 0.5 mL L1 medium [24] were added to each well of a 24-well tissue culture plate (Sarstedt Inc., Newton, MA, USA). Growth conditions were 20 ± 1 °C, irradiance of ca. 35 µmol photons m−2 s−1, 12 h:12 h L:D cycle. After ca. two weeks of incubation under these conditions, blue Haslea silbo sp. nov. flourished in one well, and several monoclonal cultures (K-1283 to K-1289) were established by single cell micro-pipetting.
Blue diatoms morphologically similar to the strains from La Gomera were later sampled in North Carolina (USA) in July 2013, and thereafter isolated and kept in the Nantes Culture Collection (NCC) with the references NCC 454, NCC 455, and NCC 456. Other strains were isolated from the Gulf of Naples (Italy) between November 2014 and May 2015 at the LTER-Marechiara Station (40°48′ N, 14°15′ E) for strains NaS3, NaS23, NaS31, NaS32, NaS33, NaS34, NaS35, in the South Adriatic Sea in November 2016 (42°32′N, 17°59′E) for strain BIOTAII-43, and in Mersin, Turkey (36°47′ N, 34°35′ E) on March 2017 for strain SZCZMV2009.
Cultivation of H. silbo strains was conducted in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 150 mL of modified artificial sea water (ASW) [25], under controlled conditions (15 ± 1 °C, irradiance of 60 µmol photons m−2 s−1, 14 h:10 h L:D cycle) at Le Mans Université. Culture illumination was provided by fluorescent tubes (Philips TLD 36W/965) and irradiance was measured using a Li-Cor LI-189 quantum meter coupled with a 2Π Li-Cor Q21284 quantum sensor.

2.2. Microscopy

Different protocols were employed for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses, depending on the strains studied and the institution where the study was conducted. The original material from La Gomera was cleaned of organic matter according to Hendey [26], except that cells were collected by centrifugation rather than sedimentation during repetitive washings (3–4 times) in distilled water. Cleaned cells were mounted on glass slides with Naphrax and observed in LM using an Olympus BX51 (Tokyo, Japan), with a DP72 digital camera, in differential interference contrast and phase contrast. For SEM examinations, cleaned frustules were air-dried onto circular coverslip mounted on an aluminum stub and sputter coated with either gold, platinum, or palladium-platinum alloy. Observations were done, depending on the facilities, using a JUC5000 or JEOL JFC2300 HR High Resolution Fine and JEOL 7600F or JEOL J 6335F or JEOL JSM-5600 (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) or FEG Tescan MIRA3 microscope (Brno, Czech Republic). For TEM material was air-dried onto 200 mesh Formvar covered copper grid. The TEM observations were made using a JEOL JEM-1010 (Tokyo, Japan) operated at 80 kV, equipped with a GATAN Orius SC1000 digital camera (Pleasanton, CA, USA). Measurements of valve structural elements were made from SEM images using the ImageJ software (http://rsb/info/nih/gov/ij (accessed on 1 September 2010)).

2.3. Pigment Extraction and Purification

Strain K-1285 was maintained in exponential growth phase and the biomass was collected every week. Cells and supernatant were separated by gentle centrifugation (10 min, 900 g, slow acceleration/deceleration, 4 °C), using a Sigma 3K15 and a rotor n°11133 (Bioblock Scientific, Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France). Pigments were purified and quantified according to the method developed by Pouvreau et al. (2006) [27], which consists of two-step ultrafiltration and anion-exchange chromatography.

2.4. UV–Visible Spectrophotometry

Purified pigment from H. silbo, intracellular and extracellular forms, were dissolved in distilled water at a concentration of 10 mg mL−1. A series of flasks containing 100 mL of 0.25 M Na2HPO4/NaH2PO4 buffer were prepared, with pH ranging from 2 to 12. The different buffers were filtered on a 0.22 µm membrane using a syringe. A mixture of 50 µL of buffer and 50 µL of pigment solution was placed in a Hellma quartz cell (Hellma, Germany), and homogenized by shaking using parafilm as seal. Absorbance measurements were done using a Thermo electron Helios gamma UV–visible spectrophotometer (Cambridge, UK). Blank measurement was made with buffer solution and spectra were recorded from 220 nm to 800 nm.

2.5. Raman Spectrometry

In vitro Raman spectrometry was performed as described previously [19,21] using purified marennine from H. ostrearia as a reference. Then, 200–500 µg of both intracellular and extracellular forms of H. ostrearia and H. silbo pigments were dissolved in 0.25 M Na2HPO4/NaH2PO4 buffer, pH 7, and the mixture was then placed on a glass slide and dried at room temperature. The laser beam was focused on the dry aggregates on the slides, on the darkest areas, where pigments were at seemingly higher concentration. Raman spectra were collected from different areas of the sample and averaged with an integration time varying between 200 and 600 s and an excitation power below 0.3 mW. For each series of measurements, the 514.5 nm wavelength radiation from a coherent spectrum argon/krypton ion laser built by Coherent Innova (Utrecht, the Netherlands) was selected to provide a good signal/noise ratio. The Raman spectra were recorded in the back-scattering configuration on a confocal T64000 Horiba, Jobin Yvon spectrometer (Longjumeau, France) coupled to a liquid-N2-cooled Charged Coupled Device detector. All Raman spectra were recorded within the 250–2250 cm−1 wavelength region and were shifted in the figures (with no baseline correction) for clarity.

2.6. Induction of Auxosporulation and Reproductive Behaviour

Monoclonal cultures were maintained in exponential growth phase by semi-continuous cultivation and periodic dilution with fresh medium, under the conditions described above. Cell density of cultures was estimated using a Nageotte counting cell (Hecht, Germany). Mixtures of parental cultures were made in sterile polystyrene Petri dishes at a concentration of 2000 cells mL−1. The first set of experiments was conducted using one pair of sexually compatible clones of H. ostrearia (NCC158.4 and NCC148.78), three clones of H. silbo (K-1283, K-1286, and K-1287), and one clone of H. karadagensis (NCC313). Clones were crossed pairwise. Culture plates with mixed parent clones were sealed with parafilm to prevent desiccation and placed in a growth chamber under a 6 h:18 h L:D cycle, with an irradiance ≤30 µmol photons m−2 s−1. Experiments were run in triplicate. The second set of experiments was conducted later using monoclonal cultures of H. silbo originating from the Gulf of Naples. In this case, the mating protocol and culture conditions were similar to those employed with H. karadagensis [23].

2.7. Molecular Barcoding

Molecular barcoding was performed on the original strains of H. silbo from la Gomera in the same way as performed on H. karadagensis and H. provincialis [19,21]. A similar protocol was used to amplify the rbcL gene of strain NaS3 from Naples. For the South Adriatic strain BIOTAII-43, DNA was isolated from 50 mL of an exponentially growing culture using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The purity of the extracted DNA was assessed with the NanoDrop spectrophotometer (BioSpec-nano Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The nuclear 18S (SSU) rRNA gene and two chloroplast-encoded genes (rbcL, psbC) were amplified using the EmeraldAmpMax PCR Master Mix© (Takara Bio, Mountain View, CA, USA). When necessary, nested PCR reaction was done, with the PCR product from the first reaction used as a template for second reaction. The PCR products were visualized in a 1% agarose gel and then purified with StartaPrep PCR Purification Kit (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). The purified products were sent for Sanger sequencing (Macrogen©, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). All sequences were checked, edited, and assembled (5′–3′ and 3′–5′ ends) using Sequencher 4.1.4. In the case of NCC 456 and SZCZMV2009, molecular barcodes have been obtained using next generation sequencing, as described below. All DNA sequences have been submitted to GenBank and obtained registration number.

2.8. Next Generation Sequencing

Clones NCC456 and SZCZMV2009 were cultivated under the conditions described above. DNA was extracted following Doyle and Doyle (1990) [28]. Sequencing was conducted at the Beijing Genomic Institute Shenzhen facilities (Hong Kong, China). NCC456 was sequenced in 2015 on an Illumina Hiseq 4000 (22 million 150 bp paired-end reads, 250 bp insert) and SZCZMV2009 was sequenced in 2019 on a BGISEQ-500 (60 million 100 bp paired-end reads). Data were assembled using SPAdes 3.14.0 [29] with a k-mer of 85, and verified with Consed [30]. ORFs and genes encoded in the organelle genomes and plasmids were identified as previously described [31] and tRNA genes were localized with tRNAscan-SE 1.23 [32]. GenBank files were generated using Sequin 13.70 and were used to create maps using OGDRAW [33]. Whole genome alignments were obtained from progressiveMauve [34].

2.9. Phylogenetic Analysis

A maximum likelihood (ML) phylogeny was inferred from the partial rbcL gene using sequences obtained from PCR amplifications, extracted from complete plastid genomes or downloaded from GenBank. The rbcL sequences of the Naviculaceae Seminavis robusta Danielidis and Mann and Trachyneis sp., were added as outgroups. Sequences were aligned using MAFFT [35] and trimmed to a final length of 597 bp. The phylogenetic analysis was conducted using RAxML 8.0 [36] and data partitioned by first and second codon positions. The best tree out of 100 was computed for 1000 bootstrap replicates.

3. Results

3.1. Description

Haslea silbo Gastineau, Hansen and Mouget sp. nov.
Figures 1–17
Description: In LM, cells are solitary, motile and strictly lanceolate with distinctly blue sub-acute apices (Figure 1). The pigmentation appears blue in cell apical vacuoles and green outside the cells when released in growth medium. Two band-like chloroplasts lie appressed to the girdle of the cell.
With cleaned frustules, only the valve outline and a distinct and straight raphe sternum are visible (Figure 2a,b). Length ranges between 138.0 µm for the largest initial cells to 20.2 µm for final stage cultures, with the corresponding widths of 10.0 to 5.0, respectively. At the time clone K-1285 was deposited as holotype at the Natural History Museum of Denmark, its length was 48.2 µm to 52.4 µm, and width 8.1 µm to 8.8 µm (n = 10).
In SEM, the valves are lanceolate with sub-acute apices (Figure 3a,b).
Externally, the raphe fissures open slightly laterally in a narrow raphe sternum, ending more centrally (co-axially), with expanded closely-positioned ends. There is no lateral expansion of a central area. The apical raphe endings are straight, slightly expanded for the last micron (Figure 3a and Figure 4a,b). Internally the raphe fissures are straight, opening slightly laterally in the raphe sternum except at the center, where they are central in the very slightly widened sternum. At the poles the fissures terminate in narrow, slightly elevated helictoglossae. The raphe sternum is flanked by a very narrow accessory costa throughout its length on one side, with a short fine central bar on the other side (Figure 4c). Neither hide the raphe sternum (Figure 3b and Figure 4c,d). Externally the areolae open within narrow slits that run parallel to the raphe system throughout the valve, abutting the peripheral slits at the valve margins; the peripheral slits abut each other sharply at each apex (Figure 3a and Figure 4a,b). Internally the areolae are square (near center) to rectangular (near apices and margins), formed by the perpendicular intersection of the virgae (between transverse striae) and vimines (between longitudinal striae) (Figure 3b and Figure 4c,d). There are 32 transapical and 37–38 longitudinal striae in 10 µm (n = 10).

3.1.1. Additional Morphometric and Morphological Data

Cell size gradually diminished in monoclonal cultures, with the length/width ratio also decreasing. Figure 5a–e illustrate this reduction in cell size because of the MacDonald-Pfitzer rule for the clone K-1285 between July 2009 and January 2012. The differences in the colour of the apices reflects the production of the marennine-like pigment, which seems triggered by higher light conditions.
As size diminished, frustules often exhibited deformities, as seen in LM on Figure 6 picturing (clone K-1285) and SEM on Figure 7a,b (clone K-1289).

3.1.2. Holotype

Accession numbers CAT 2472 and CAT 2473 for a permanent slide of the K-1285 clone and an acid-cleaned sample of K-1285 kept in 70% ethanol, respectively, deposited at the Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen. Some valve parts of this type material are shown in Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4.

3.1.3. Type Locality

La Gomera, Canary Islands, Spain (28°05′26″ N; 17°06′54″ W), benthos.

3.1.4. Etymology

The specific epithet silbo comes from the name of a whistled language “spoken” by the Guanches, native inhabitants of Berber origin of the Canary Islands, and still in use today in La Gomera.

3.1.5. Ecology

Benthic species, found on beaches and as biofilm on rocks. Sometimes epiphyte on Padina spp.

3.1.6. Molecular Signature

The ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 sequences are available in Genbank as HE663060 (K-1283) and HE978358 (K-1289). The rbcL sequences are available as HE663065 (K-1283), HE978358 (K-1289) (Canary Islands), MH355570 (NaS3), and MG189641 (BIOTAII-43). SSU and psbC partial sequences have also been obtained on BIOTAII-43 and registered as MG189639 and MG189640, respectively. For NCC456 and SZCZMV2009, complete organellar genomes and the cluster of nuclear rRNA genes were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers MW645081 (mitogenome NCC456), MW645082 (plastid genome NCC456), MW645083 (mitogenome SZCZMV2009), MW645084 (plastid genome SZCZMV2009), MW679567 (rRNA NCC456), and MW679566 (rRNA SZCZMV2009).

3.1.7. Differential Diagnosis

Haslea silbo is very similar to H. ostrearia, H. karadagensis [19], H. provincialis [21], and H. nusantara [22], with respect to overall shape of the valves and the presence of blue apices. However, several characters differentiate these species. The apices in H. silbo appear blunter than in other blue Haslea species. H. silbo and H. nusantara share a thin central bar that discriminates them from the other species. The color of the blue apices may also help distinguishing H. silbo from H. karadagensis, whose apices appear darker and slightly grey. The most decisive feature is the stria density, which is lower in H. silbo compared to all other blue Haslea due to a significant reduction in the number of longitudinal striae, and the areolae are quadrate rather than rectangular.

3.2. Spectrophotometric Analyses of H. silbo’s Blue Pigment

UV–visible spectra obtained on intracellular (Figure 8a,b) and extracellular (Figure 9a,b) forms of the blue pigment produced by H. silbo were very similar and all displayed an isobestic point in the visible region of the spectrum at ca. 640 nm (Figure 9a,b). The position of the isobestic point at 640 nm is identical to what was already observed on the pigments of H. provincialis [21].
Raman spectrometry (in vitro) of the intracellular and extracellular forms of purified H. silbo’s pigments showed similar spectra (Figure 10). The pigment of H. silbo seems similar to the intracellular marennine of H. ostrearia but obviously different when compared to the extracellular marennine.

3.3. Reproductive Behaviour

Intraclonal reproduction was absent in the control monoclonal Petri dishes and sexualization did not occur between any of the original H. silbo clones from la Gomera (K-1283 to K-1289). Sex-interaction was also absent between sexually competent H. ostrearia strains and H. silbo strains, or between H. silbo, H. karadagensis or H. provincialis strains. However, heterothallic reproduction was detected among H. silbo strains from the Gulf of Naples: clone NaS32 proved to be sexually compatible with clones NaS31, NaS34, and NaS35. The general pattern of auxosporulation (Figure 11) appeared to be similar to those previously observed for H. ostrearia [37,38], H. karadagensis [23], and H. provincialis [21]. The minimum and maximum sizes of the gametangia were 61 µm and 75 µm, respectively (n = 36). The minimum and maximum sizes of the initial cells were 115 µm and 138 µm, respectively (n = 36).

3.4. Genomics

3.4.1. NCC456 Mitochondrial Genome

The 48,658 base pairs (bp) mitochondrial genome of strain NCC456 encodes 58 conserved genes (34 protein-coding, 2 rRNA genes and 22 tRNA genes) (Figure 12). Two pairs of protein-coding genes are fused in single reading frames, namely, nad6/nad2 and rps13/cox3. An atp6 pseudogene of 1283 bp lies between cox1 and atp6. The NCC456 mitochondrial genome also displays a conserved open reading frame of 162 codons (orf162) showing similarity with the orf147 of Berkeleya fennica Juhlin-Dannfelt (YP_009115295) [39,40]. This hypothetical gene is located in a conserved gene cluster extending from tatC (mttB) to rps11, which is found in several other diatom species [40]. There are also 3 other ORFs, namely, orf137a, orf184a, and orf224a. There are three group II introns in cox1 that each contain an ORF encoding a putative reverse transcriptase (RT) (orf685, orf718, and orf790) displaying similarity with mitochondrial intron-encoded RTs from other diatoms. Moreover, a group II intron of 649 bp interrupts the rnl gene.

3.4.2. SZCZMV2009 Mitochondrial Genome

The 48,031 bp mitochondrial genome of strain SZCZMV2009 encodes the same 58 conserved genes that are found in strain NCC456 (Figure 13) and also orf137a, orf184a, and orf224a. These genes display the same order in the two strains. Like the NCC456 genome, the SZCZMV2009 mitochondrial genome also contains the conserved orf162 as well as a 1283-bp atp6 pseudogene. This pseudogene is located between cox1 and a 210-bp region showing 99% identity with the 3′ end of cox1; the latter region is absent from strain NCC456. The cox1 gene contains two group II introns, with different insertion points compared to the introns found in NCC456, that encode putative RTs (orf656 and orf738) showing similarity with mitochondrial intron-encoded RTs from other diatoms. The rnl gene is interrupted by a 2346-bp group II intron, at the same position as for the intron discovered in NCC456. This intron also encodes a RT (orf294).

3.4.3. Comparison with The Mitochondrial Genome of H. nusantara

The whole genome alignment obtained from progressiveMauve is shown in Figure 14. The gaps observed when comparing H. silbo NCC456 and SZCZMV2009 represent the differences in intron contents, which also discriminates both of them from H. nusantara. The portion displayed in green corresponds to a change of strand of orf224 in H. silbo compared to the corresponding orf226 in H. nusantara. A comparison with the genome of H. nusantara (MH681882) and blastp analyzes of ist content showed that it also displays a fusion of nad6/nad2, although not indicated on GenBank. However, the fusion of rps13/cox3 differentiates H. silbo from H. nusantara, in which both genes are distinct.

3.4.4. NCC456 Plastid Genome

The 157,307-bp plastid genome of strain NCC456 displays an inverted repeat (IR) sequence of 7297 bp that separates this genome into large (LSC) and small (SSC) single-copy region of 75,060 and 67,653 bp, respectively (Figure 15). The LSC encodes for 51 conserved protein coding genes, 7 tRNA, but also displays 2 non-conserved ORFs comprised between groEL and trnR, and especially a large insertion of ca. 32,325 bp between ycf35 and psbA that contains 28 non-conserved ORFs, two putative xerC genes coding for DNA integrases/recombinases and a putative serC gene coding for a serine recombinase. It is worth being underlined that the two putative xerC genes, although slightly differing in their lengths (888 bp and 939 bp), showed a remarkable identity of 79.21% as calculated by clustal omega. The SSC encodes for 74 conserved protein coding genes and 17 tRNA. A single group II intron of 2921 bp encoding a RT (orf608) is found in the psaA gene. This RT shows 83% sequence identity with the RT identified in the same gene of the diatom Toxarium undulatum Bailey [41]. The IR encodes for a single conserved protein coding gene, three rRNA genes, and three tRNA.

3.4.5. SZCZMV2009 Plastid Genome

The 156,701 bp plastid genome of strain SZCZMV2009 (Figure 16) has the same gene content and gene order than the genome of strain NCC456. The LSC is 67,653 bp long, the SSC is 74,454 bp long and the IR is 7297 bp long. The insertion sequence between ycf35 and psbA, which is slightly shorter (31,719 bp) than the homologous region in strain NCC456, contains 25 non-conserved ORFs, two putative xerC genes and two putative serC genes. Furthermore, between groEL and trnR there are three ORFs instead of two when compared to NCC456. As in the NCC456 plastid genome, a 2921-bp group II intron encoding a RT (orf608) is present in psaA.

3.4.6. Comparison with The Plastid Genome of H. nusantara

The whole genome alignment obtained from progressiveMauve is shown in Figure 17. The region in emerald green represents a whole portion of the genome, located between ycf35 and clpC and comprising the cluster of ribosomal protein genes, which has been rearranged, while the region in blue, which is nearly entirely lacking in H. nusantara, represents the region of insertion between ycf35 and psbA.

3.4.7. NCC456 Plasmids

Three circular plasmids, namely, pHSC1 (3534 bp; MW651861), pHSC2 (4440 bp; MW651862), and pHSC3 (4426 bp; MW651863), each featuring a putative serine recombinase gene (serC), were identified among the contigs of the NCC456 assembly. Their circular nature was deduced from the overlapping extremities displayed by each of these contigs. The best blastp results for these putative serine recombinase proteins are AZJ16760 from the plastid genome of the diatom S. robusta (evalue 3e-117, identity 77.3%), YP_003734627 from the plastid genome of the dinotom Kryptoperidinium foliaceum (F.Stein) Lindemann (evalue 4e-119, identity 79.62%), and NNL21571 from the bacteria Ignavibacteriaceae bacterium (evalue 5e-121, identity 80.66%) for pHSC1, pHSC2, and pHSC3, respectively. Plasmids also code for other hypothetical proteins, which are orf480 for pHSC1; orf361 and orf513 for pHSC2; orf138, orf350, and orf515 for pHSC3.

3.4.8. SZCZMV2009 Plasmids

Three circular plasmids, namely, pHSM1 (3556 bp; MW651864), pHSM2 (4513 bp; MW651865), and pHSM3 (4117 bp; MW651866), were also identified among the contigs of the SZCZMV2009 assembly. Both the pHSM1 and pHSM3 plasmids are highly similar in sequence (99.86% and 99.56% identity) to the NCC456 pHSC1 and pHSC3 plasmids, respectively, as they also code for the same putative proteins and ORFs). On the other hand, the pHSM2 plasmid sequence appears to be specific to the SZCZMV2009 strain, as no homologous sequence was recovered among the contigs of the NCC456 strain. The plasmid sequence pHSM2 codes for a putative serine recombinase whose best blastp match is the already evoked AZJ16760 from S. robusta (evalue 3e-126, identity 80.73%).

3.4.9. Phylogeny

The tree inferred from the rbcL sequences of 40 diatoms displays a strongly supported clade (96% bootstrap support) containing all five Haslea species that are able to produce a blue pigment (H. silbo, H. nusantara, H. provincialis, H. karadagensis, and H. ostrearia) (Figure 18). Haslea silbo appears at the base of this clade. Apart from the clade of blue diatoms, two major clades can be observed in the tree. The clade sister to the blue Haslea clade contains non-blue species whose classification has reached a consensus (Haslea pseudostrearia Massé, Rincé and Cox, Haslea nipkowii (Meister) M.Poulin and G.Massé, Haslea feriarum M.A.Tiffany and F.A.S.Sterrenburg, Haslea vitrea (Cleve) Simonsen, Haslea crucigeroides (Hustedt) Simonsen, and Haslea arculata Lobban and Ashworth) [42,43,44,45]. The third major clade contains the species of pennate diatoms which were meant to be the outgroup (e.g., Trachyneis sp.) as well as numerous species listed as Haslea spp., but whose exact identities and classification have been recently linked to Navicula sensu lato [44].

4. Discussion

This study describes Haslea silbo, the fifth species of blue Haslea, also the second whose cosmopolitanism is demonstrated by molecular methods, raising questions about biodiversity, geographical distribution, and phylogeny as well as endemism/cosmopolitanism among benthic diatoms. These findings also illustrate the general trend of increasing number of cryptic or pseudo-cryptic species of diatoms discovered, made possible by the availability of supplementary and complementary tools for taxonomical studies, including electron microscopy, mating experiments, and molecular biology [46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. Most of these studies underscore the necessity of using a combination of methods for reliable identification at species level.
Haslea ostrearia was the first blue diatom to be described [2], but the assumption of its cosmopolitan distribution goes back to the times when only LM was available. It is now certain, as it was demonstrated by SEM and molecular taxonomy, that H. ostrearia can be found in both hemispheres, as well as in the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean [20,54]. On the contrary, H. karadagensis, H. provincialis, and H. nusantara seem to have a limited distribution, having only been observed in the Black Sea, the Mediterranean Sea, and the Java Sea, respectively. In contrast, H. silbo sp. nov. has been identified in multiple locations that are far from each other (the Canary archipelago, the North Carolina coasts, and three different sites of the Mediterranean Sea). This species might have been observed on the shores of Brazil [55], but its identity was not confirmed by molecular taxonomy.
Morphologically, H. silbo is very similar to other blue Haslea species, H. ostrearia, H. karadagensis, H. provincialis, and H. nusantara. However, the morphometrics showed significant differences regarding the density of the longitudinal striae, which is lower in H. silbo, and also regarding the size and shape of the areolae, which are larger and more quadratic, respectively. Moreover, like H. nusantara, H. silbo displays a central small thin bar on the internal surface of its valve, but there is none in the other blue species described yet [22]. This shared character between H. silbo and H. nusantara may be of some taxonomic significance, considering the close position of these two species in the phylogeny inferred from rbcL sequences. As is the case for H. provincialis [21], H. silbo seems to possess a single form of the marennine pigment, differently from H. ostrearia for which two different forms, intracellular and extracellular, have been described.
The process of sexual reproduction appears to be very conserved within the genus Haslea, as it was observed among either blue [21,23,37,38] or non-blue species [56,57]. At 138 µm, the maximum size of the initial cells observed for H. silbo appeared to be higher than the values measured for H. karadagensis and H. provincialis (97 µm and 109 µm, respectively) but lower than the 143 µm measured for H. ostrearia [21,23,37,38]. The unsuccessful mating experiments conducted on the strains from La Gomera might have been the result of having only one mating type among these strains, as it was shown in similar studies with other Haslea or Pseudo-nitzschia species [37,46]. Note here that the former experiments were conducted with only three clones of H. silbo, which is the strict minimal number of clones needed to most likely have two compatible mating types according to Chepurnov et al. (2004) [58]. Furthermore, there is a possibility that all the monoclonal cultures from La Gomera might have as well correspond to a single individual, as they were established from the same enrichment micro-well, inoculated with only 1 mL of sample. Unfortunately, the clones from la Gomera died before it was possible to perform mating experiments between them and the strains from Naples.
When the first H. silbo strains were discovered a decade ago, little was known about the distribution and diversity of blue diatoms, which led to consider it might be an endemic species from the Canary Islands. Few studies have been reported on the diatom flora of the Canary Islands [59,60,61,62], and only one of them refers to the presence of H. ostrearia, along with Haslea britannica (Hustedt and Aleem) Witkowski, Lange-Bertalot and Metzeltin [63], without providing information about the island concerned. Haslea spicula (Hickie) Bukhtiyarova was also listed [64]. Cleaned frustules of H. britannica and H. spicula could hardly have been misidentified with H. silbo, because of obvious differences in densities of striae (for both species) or the presence of a pseudo-stauros (a thickening of its central costa detectable in light microscopy) in H. spicula [65].
The Canary Islands are both geographically isolated and at the confluence of important ocean shipping routes, which raises a paradox concerning the geographical origin of the H. silbo isolates identified there. These islands form an archipelago composed of volcanic islands, located ca. 100 km north-west of the African coast but geologically distinct from the African continental shelf. The distance between neighboring islands ranges between ca. 20 km to ca. 100 km. First mention of the Canary Islands can be ascribed historically to the Phoenicians. The islands were successively visited and/or conquered by the ancient Greeks and Romans, then the Spanish during the fifteenth century. The Canary Islands were thus used as port of call for Columbus’ expeditions. After 1492, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria and Santa Cruz de Tenerife were common stopping points for ships going to, and coming from the New World. Similarly, the long history of the port of Naples, founded in the ninth century BC by Greek settlers, is in accordance with the hypothesis of human-mediated transfer of species, Naples having belonged to several maritime empires, like Byzantium, Normans, and Spain during the Spanish golden century.
As we demonstrated that H. silbo is a cosmopolitan species, it can be hypothesized that human-mediated translocation to or from the archipelago and other geographical locations happened. Such transfers could have been facilitated (or promoted) by ballast water [66,67]. Alternatively, non-human mediated transfers could come from sea mammals or sea turtles [68,69,70], drifting plastic [71], and from translocation of shellfish, e.g., due to the introduction of the European flat oyster in North America during the 1940s and 1950s [72,73]. Note here that oyster transfers have been documented as a vector for the introduction of other organisms [74].
Given the important role of the Canary Islands as ports of call, it is reasonable to hypothesize that the dispersal of H. silbo on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean has been human mediated. As soon as the early sixteenth century Spaniards went from Mediterranean Sea to what is today North Carolina, with stopover in the Canary Islands. The internal traffic in the Mediterranean Sea, between East and West, goes back in history as far as the history of the region itself, and both ways are of course still currently in use. This is the most coherent hypothesis that can be proposed regarding the dispersal of a benthic species, which is most likely to sink and form biofilms rather than drifting in the water column like a planktonic species and consequently, the true geographical origin of this taxon will probably remain a mystery.
The phylogenetic position of H. silbo seems to dispute with H. nusantara [22] a more basal position in the blue clade. Narrowing the gap between blue and non-blue species, especially to the cosmopolitan H. pseudostrearia [75], will be an important step for “omics” investigations about the mechanisms of appearance and development of the blue pigment biosynthetic pathway among the Haslea species.
Since the mitochondrial and plastid genomes of H. nusantara have already been described [22], it is possible to draw some comparisons between the two species. At 120,448 bp, the size of the H. nusantara plastid genome is significantly smaller than the sizes observed for H. silbo. The size of the H. silbo plastid genome is closer to those of S. robusta (150,905 bp) [76], Eunotia bilunaris (Ehrenberg) Schaarschmidt (152,906 bp) and Cylindrotheca closterium (Ehrenberg) Reimann and Lewin (165,809 bp) [77]. The extra length of the H. silbo plastid genome relative to that of H. nusantara is explained by the large insertion of DNA from a putative plasmidial origin between psbA and ycf35. The size of this insertion, as well as the number of putative serine recombinase and DNA integrase/recombinase genes in it, suggest that several plasmids were concerned. Similar insertions have been observed in the plastid genomes of C. closterium (KC509522) [77], Asterionellopsis glacialis (Castracane) Round (KC509520) [77], S. robusta (MH356727) [76] and the dinotom K. foliaceum (GU591328) [78]. Further, serC genes have been observed in the plastid genome of Nanofrustulum shiloi (J.J.Lee, Reimer and McEnery) Round, Hallsteinsen and Paasche (MN276191) [79]. Haslea silbo is the second diatom species after T. undulatum, a centric mediophycean diatom, to present a group II intron in its psaA [41]. Several circular plasmids, similar to those found in Cylindrotheca Rabenhorst [77,80,81], were discovered in the two H. silbo strains analyzed. All these plasmids, which are only known among pennate diatoms [82], bear a putative serine recombinase serC gene.
Concerning the mitochondrial genome, in contrast to species such as Phaeodactylum tricornutum Bohlin, Thalassiosira pseudonana Hasle and Heimdal [83], Synedra acus Kützing [84], or Asterionella formosa Hassall [85], there are no repeated regions in the H. silbo mitogenome, which is a situation also found in H. nusantara and B. fennica [39]. The mitogenome of H. silbo is very similar in size (48,031 bp and 48,658 bp) to that of N. ramosissima (C. Agardh) Cleve (48,652 bp) (KX343079) [85], mainly because of the presence of the three group II introns within the cox1 gene. Interestingly, the intron orf685 is only loosely associated with introns discovered in diatom mitochondria (Ulnaria acus (Kützing) Aboal, e-value 9e-86, identity 32%) (GU002153) [84]. The intron in rnl displays similarities with the one present in the same mitochondrial gene of N. ramosissima [86].
Perhaps, the most intriguing features of the H. silbo mitogenome are the presence of an atp6-like pseudogene near the functional gene, which is conserved between NCC456 and SZCZMV2009, and the fusion of two pairs of protein coding genes. Nuclear pseudogenes of mitochondrial origin are well documented among animals [87], and mitochondrial pseudogenes kept in the mitochondrion have been discovered among various animals too [88,89,90,91,92,93,94]. In plants and algae, there are very few records of pseudogenes in mitochondria [95,96,97,98,99]. Regarding the fusion of genes inside single ORFs, the one concerning cox3 and rps13 is the most disturbing. Hence, while nad2 and nad6 code for sub-units of the same protein (NADH dehydrogenase), the biological functions of rps13 and cox3 are absolutely different. Thus, there might be an obligatory mechanism leading to the obtention of two distinct and functional proteins, which is yet to be discovered.
Furthermore, it is worth to note that regarding the cox1 gene, alignments of the CDS for clones NCC456 and SZCZMV2009 showed a 99.53% identity between them. When trimmed and aligned to the 721 bp cox1 fragments that were obtained on H. ostrearia [54] the identity rose to 99.58%, with only three polymorphisms. For the corresponding portion of gene of H. ostrearia, seven polymorphisms were found [54] and as far as our knowledge on these species goes, no cox1 introns were evidenced in any of the populations of H. ostrearia studied up to now. A broader sequencing effort devoted to blue Haslea mitogenomes would be needed to draw any conclusion, however the results obtained on H. silbo may suggest that the dynamics of introns is not such an infrequent event when compared to the occurrence of SNPs.

5. Conclusions

The present study expands our knowledge on the biodiversity and biogeography of species from the genus Haslea producing blue pigments. We describe a new cosmopolitan species, Haslea silbo sp. nov., using a multi-pronged protocol. This protocol includes the use of next generation sequencing, which has proven to provide highly valuable results, both at the species and population levels. For the further fulfillment of our studies on blue diatoms, we already consider a systematic use of NGS for any description of new population and species.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.G.; Funding acquisition, J.-L.M.; Investigation, R.G., G.H., M.P., C.L., M.T., J.-F.B., V.L., Y.H., M.M. (Michèle Morançais), J.F., P.G., V.M., N.A.D., O.I.D., I.K., J.M.E., E.S.O., A.M.Q., M.M. (Maja Mucko), S.M., D.S., B.J., C.F., J.S., N.L.L., P.S.K.J., E.E.-D., M.K., J.-L.M.; Methodology, R.G.; Project administration, A.W., J.-L.M.; Supervision, R.G., A.W., J.-L.M.; Visualization, R.G., G.H., J.M.E.; Writing—original draft, R.G.; Writing—review and editing, G.H., M.P., C.L., M.T., E.J.C., A.W., I.K., and J.-L.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the European Commission under the Community’s Seventh Framework Program BIOVADIA (contract No. FP7-PEOPLE-2010-IRSES-269294, Biodiversity and Valorization of Blue Diatoms), the Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program GHaNA (The Genus Haslea, New marine resources for blue biotechnology and Aquaculture, grant agreement No [734708/GHANA/H2020-MSCA-RISE-2016] J.-L.M.) and also the 2017–2021 research funds granted for implementation of a co-financed international research project from Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education. Partial support was also provided by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant awarded to I.K. Funding was provided by the Canadian Museum of Nature to M.P. Founding for M.M. (Maja Mucko) was provided by Croatian Science Foundation (HRZZ) under the project UIP-2013-11-6433. Funding for N.A.D. and O.I.D. was partly provided by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (project No. АААА-А19-119012490045-0, Study of Fundamental Physical, Physiological, Biochemical, Reproductive, Population and Behavioral Characteristics of Marine Hydrobionts). S.M. was supported by a PhD fellowship from Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All molecular data have been deposited on GenBank has described above. Sequences have also been deposited on Zenodo with the following permanent link (http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4588885 accessed on 8 March 2021).

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Marianne Ellegaard (Dept. of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen) for collection of water sample from La Gomera.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Simonsen, R. The diatom plankton of the Indian Ocean expedition of RV “Meteor” 1964–1965. Meteor Forschungsergebnisse Reihe D 1974, 9, 1–66. [Google Scholar]
  2. Poulin, M.; Méléder, V.; Mouget, J.-L. Typification of the first recognized blue pigmented diatom, Haslea ostrearia (Bacillariophyceae). Plant Ecol. Evol. 2019, 152, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gastineau, R.; Turcotte, F.; Pouvreau, J.-B.; Morançais, M.; Fleurence, J.; Windarto, E.; Semba Prasetiya, F.; Arsad, S.; Jaouen, P.; Babin, M.; et al. Marennine, promising blue pigments from a widespread Haslea diatom species complex. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 3161–3189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Sprat, T. The history of the generation and ordering of green Oysters, commonly called Colchester Oysters. In The History of the Royal-Society of London for the Improving of Natural Knowledge by Tho. Sprat; Royal Society: London, UK, 1669; pp. 307–319. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gaillon, B. Des huîtres vertes, et des causes de cette coloration. J. Phys. Chim. Hist. Nat. Arts 1820, 91, 222–225. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dyer, W.T.T. Greening of oysters. Nature 1877, 16, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Lankester, E.R. On green oysters. Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 1886, 26, 71–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pouvreau, J.B.; Morançais, M.; Taran, F.; Rosa, P.; Dufossé, L.; Guérard, F.; Pin, S.; Fleurence, J.; Pondaven, P. Antioxidant and free radical scavenging properties of marennine, a blue-green polyphenolic pigment from the diatom Haslea ostrearia (Gaillon/Bory) Simonsen responsible for the natural greening of cultured oysters. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 6278–6286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gastineau, R.; Pouvreau, J.-B.; Hellio, C.; Morançais, M.; Fleurence, J.; Gaudin, P.; Bourgougnon, N.; Mouget, J.-L. Biological activities of purified marennine, the blue pigment responsible for the greening of oysters. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 3599–3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gastineau, R.; Hardivillier, Y.; Leignel, V.; Morançais, M.; Fleurence, J.; Hellio, C.; Bourgougnon, N.; Davidovich, N.A.; Tekaya, N.; Gaudin, P.; et al. Greening effect on oysters and biological activities of the blue pigment produced by the diatom Haslea karadagensis (Naviculaceae). Aquaculture 2012, 368–369, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gastineau, R.; Prasetiya, F.S.; Falaise, C.; Cognie, B.; Decottignies, P.; Morançais, M.; Méléder, V.; Davidovich, N.; Turcotte, F.; Tremblay, R.; et al. Marennine-Like Pigments: Blue Diatom or Green Oyster Cult? In Blue Biotechnology; Barre, S.L., Bates, S.S., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Falaise, C.; François, C.; Travers, M.A.; Morga, B.; Haure, J.; Tremblay, R.; Turcotte, F.; Pasetto, P.; Gastineau, R.; Hardivillier, Y.; et al. Antimicrobial Compounds from Eukaryotic Microalgae against Human Pathogens and Diseases in Aquaculture. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Falaise, C.; Cormier, P.; Tremblay, R.; Audet, C.; Deschênes, J.S.; Turcotte, F.; François, C.; Seger, A.; Hallegraeff, G.; Lindquist, N.; et al. Harmful or harmless: Biological effects of marennine on marine organisms. Aquat. Toxicol. 2019, 209, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Falaise, C.; James, A.; Travers, M.-A.; Zanella, M.; Badawi, M.; Mouget, J.-L. Complex Relationships between the Blue Pigment Marennine and Marine Bacteria of the Genus Vibrio. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Prasetiya, F.S.; Safitri, I.; Widowati, I.; Cognie, B.; Decottignies, P.; Gastineau, R.; Morançais, M.; Windarto, E.; Tremblay, R.; Mouget, J. Does allelopathy affect co-culturing Haslea ostrearia with other microalgae relevant to aquaculture? J. Appl. Phycol. 2016, 28, 2241–2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Prasetiya, F.S.; Decottignies, P.; Tremblay, R.; Mouget, J.L.; Cognie, B. Does culture supernatant of Haslea ostrearia containing marennine affect short-term physiological traits in the adult blue mussel Mytilus edulis? Aquac. Rep. 2019, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Prasetiya, F.S.; Sunarto, S.; Bachtiar, E.; Agung, M.U.K.; Nathanael, B.; Pambudi, A.C.; Lestari, A.D.; Astuty, S.; Mouget, J.-L. Effect of the blue pigment produced by the tropical diatom Haslea nusantara on marine organisms from different trophic levels and its bioactivity. Aquac. Rep. 2020, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Permatasari, I.; Agung, M.U.K.; Liviawaty, E.; Astuty, S.; Risjani, Y.; Arsad, S.; Mouget, J.-L.; Prasetiya, F.S. Antibacterial Activity of Haslea ostrearia Supernatant Adapted in Indonesia against Pathogenic Bacteria Relevant to Mariculture (In-Vitro Study). Omni Akuatika 2019, 15, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gastineau, R.; Davidovich, N.A.; Bardeau, J.F.; Caruso, A.; Leignel, V.; Hardivillier, Y.; Jacquette, B.; Davidovich, O.; Rince, Y.; Gaudin, P.; et al. Haslea karadagensis (Bacillariophyta): A second blue diatom, recorded from the Black Sea and producing a novel blue pigment. Eur. J. Phycol. 2012, 47, 469–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Gastineau, R.; Davidovich, N.A.; Hansen, G.; Rines, J.; Wulff, A.; Kaczmarska, I.; Ehrman, J.; Hermann, D.; Maumus, F.; Hardivillier, Y.; et al. Haslea ostrearia-like diatoms: Biodiversity out of the blue. Adv. Bot. Res. 2014, 71, 441–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gastineau, R.; Hansen, G.; Davidovich, N.A.; Davidovich, O.; Bardeau, J.F.; Kaczmarska, I.; Ehrman, J.M.; Leignel, V.; Hardivillier, Y.; Jacquette, B.; et al. A new blue-pigmented hasleoid diatom, Haslea provincialis, from the Mediterranean Sea. Eur. J. Phycol. 2016, 51, 156–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Prasetiya, F.S.; Gastineau, R.; Poulin, M.; Hardivillier, Y.; Syakti, A.D.; Lemieux, C.; Widowati, I.; Falaise, C.; Turmel, M.; Risjani, Y.; et al. Haslea nusantara, a new blue diatom from the Java Sea, Indonesia: Morphology, biometry and molecular characterizations. Plant Ecol. Evol. 2019, 152, 188–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Davidovich, N.A.; Gastineau, R.; Gaudin, P.; Davidovich, O.; Mouget, J.-L. Sexual reproduction in the newly-described blue diatom Haslea karadagensis. Fottea 2012, 12, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Guillard, R.R.L.; Hargraves, P.E. Stichochrysis immobilis is a diatom, not a chrysophyte. Phycologia 1993, 32, 234–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Perkins, R.G.; Mouget, J.L.; Lefevbre, S.; Lavaud, J. Light response curve methodology and possible implications in the application of chlorophyll fluorescence to benthic diatoms. Mar. Biol. 2006, 149, 703–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hendey, N.I. The permanganate method for cleaning freshly gathered diatoms. Microscopy 1974, 32, 423–426. [Google Scholar]
  27. Pouvreau, J.B.; Morançais, M.; Masse, G.; Rosa, P.; Robert, J.M.; Fleurence, J.; Pondaven, P. Purification of the blue-green pigment “marennine” from the marine tychopelagic diatom Haslea ostrearia (Gaillon/Bory) Simonsen. J. Appl. Phycol. 2006, 18, 769–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Doyle, J.J.; Doyle, J.L. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 1990, 12, 13–15. [Google Scholar]
  29. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Gordon, D.; Abajian, C.; Green, P. Consed: A graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 1998, 3, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Turmel, M.; Otis, C.; Lemieux, C. Divergent copies of the large inverted repeat in the chloroplast genomes of ulvophycean green algae. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Lowe, T.M.; Eddy, S.R. tRNAscan-SE: A program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lohse, M.; Drechsel, O.; Kahlau, S.; Bock, R. OrganellarGenomeDRAW—A suite of tools for generating physical maps of plastid and mitochondrial genomes and visualizing expression data sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, W575–W581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Darling, A.E.; Mau, B.; Perna, N.T. progressiveMauve: Multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. A simple method to control over-alignment in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 1933–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Stamatakis, A. RAxML Version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Davidovich, N.A.; Mouget, J.L.; Gaudin, P. Heterothallism in the pennate diatom Haslea ostrearia (Bacillariophyta). Eur. J. Phycol. 2009, 44, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mouget, J.L.; Gastineau, R.; Davidovich, O.; Gaudin, P.; Davidovich, N.A. Light is a key factor in triggering sexual reproduction in the pennate diatom Haslea ostrearia. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2009, 69, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. An, S.M.; Noh, J.H.; Choi, D.H.; Lee, J.H.; Yang, E.C. Repeat region absent in mitochondrial genome of tube-dwelling diatom Berkeleya fennica (Naviculales, Bacillariophyceae). Mitochondrial DNA Part A 2016, 27, 2137–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pogoda, C.S.; Keepers, K.G.; Hamsher, S.E.; Stepanek, J.G.; Kane, N.C.; Kociolek, J.P. Comparative analysis of the mitochondrial genomes of six newly sequenced diatoms reveals group II introns in the barcoding region of cox1. Mitochondrial DNA Part A 2018, 30, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Ruck, E.C.; Linard, S.R.; Nakov, T.; Theriot, E.C.; Alverson, A.J. Hoarding and horizontal transfer led to an expanded gene and intron repertoire in the plastid genome of the diatom, Toxarium undulatum (Bacillariophyta). Curr. Genet. 2016, 63, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sterrenburg, F.A.S.; Tiffany, M.A.; Hinz, F.; Herwig, W.E.; Hargraves, P.E. Seven new species expand the morphological spectrum of Haslea. A comparison with Gyrosigma and Pleurosigma (Bacillariophyta). Phytotaxa 2015, 207, 143–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Poulin, M.; Massé, G.; Belt, S.T.; Delavault, P.; Rousseau, F.; Robert, J.M.; Rowland, S.J. Morphological, biochemical and molecular evidence for the transfer of Gyrosigma nipkowii Meister to the genus Haslea (Bacillariophyta). Eur. J. Phycol. 2004, 39, 181–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, Y.; Chen, X.; Sun, Z.; Xu, K. Taxonomy and molecular phylogeny of three marine benthic species of Haslea (Bacillariophyceae), with transfer of two species to Navicula. Diatom Res. 2017, 32, 451–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lobban, C.S.; Perez, C.O.; Ashworth, M.P. Non-blue Haslea species (Bacillariophyceae: Naviculaceae) in the benthic marine flora of Guam (Mariana Islands, Western Pacific Ocean). Diatom Res. 2020, 35, 163–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Amato, A.; Kooistra, W.H.C.F.; Levialdi Ghiron, J.H.; Mann, D.G.; Pröschold, T.; Montresor, M. Reproductive isolation among sympatric cryptic species in marine diatoms. Protist 2007, 158, 193–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Beszteri, B.; Ács, É.; Medlin, L.K. Ribosomal DNA sequence variation among sympatric strains of the Cyclotella meneghiniana complex (Bacillariophyceae) reveals cryptic diversity. Protist 2005, 156, 317–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kaczmarska, I.; Ehrman, J.M.; Moniz, M.B.J.; Davidovich, N. Phenotypic and genetic structure of interbreeding populations of the diatom Tabularia fasciculata (Bacillariophyta). Phycologia 2009, 48, 391–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kaczmarska, I.; Mather, L.; Luddington, I.A.; Musie, F.; Ehrman, J.M. Cryptic diversity in a cosmopolitan diatom known as Asterionellopsis glacialis (Fragilariaceae): Implications for ecology, biogeography, and taxonomy. Am. J. Bot. 2014, 101, 267–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Kermarrec, L.; Bouchez, A.; Rimet, F.; Humbert, J.F. First evidence of the existence of semi-cryptic species and of a phylogeographic structure in the Gomphonema parvulum (Kützing) Kützing complex (Bacillariophyta). Protist 2013, 164, 686–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Poulíčková, A.; Veselá, J.; Neustupa, J.; Škaloud, P. Pseudocryptic diversity versus cosmopolitanism in diatoms: A case study on Navicula cryptocephala Kütz. (Bacillariophyceae) and morphologically similar taxa. Protist 2010, 161, 353–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Vanormelingen, P.; Chepurnov, V.A.; Mann, D.G.; Sabbe, K.; Vyverman, W. Genetic divergence and reproductive barriers among morphologically heterogeneous sympatric clones of Eunotia bilunaris sensu lato (Bacillariophyta). Protist 2008, 159, 73–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mann, D.G. Discovering diatom species: Is a long history of disagreements about species-level taxonomy now at an end? Plant Ecol. Evol. 2010, 143, 251–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gastineau, R.; Leignel, V.; Jacquette, B.; Hardivillier, Y.; Wulff, A.; Gaudin, P.; Bendahmane, D.; Davidovich, N.A.; Kaczmarska, I.; Mouget, J.L. Inheritance of mitochondrial DNA in the pennate diatom Haslea ostrearia (Naviculaceae) during auxosporulation suggests a uniparental transmission. Protist 2013, 164, 340–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Fernandes, L.F.; Jardim, P.F.G. Morfologia da valva de algumas espécies de Haslea Simonsen (Bacillariophyta) do Sul do Brasil. Iheringia Série Botânica 2016, 70, 375–384. [Google Scholar]
  56. Karsten, G. Untersuchungen über Diatomeen. III. Flora 1897, 83, 203–221. [Google Scholar]
  57. Chepurnov, V.A. Polovoj protsess u dvudomnoj vodorosli Haslea subagnita (Pr.-Lavr.) Makar. et Kar. (Bacillariophyta). Algologiya 1993, 3, 37–40. [Google Scholar]
  58. Chepurnov, V.A.; Mann, D.G.; Sabbe, K.; Vyverman, W. Experimental studies on sexual reproduction in diatoms. Int. Rev. Cytol. 2004, 237, 91–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Van Den Heuvel, H.M.; Prud’homme Van Reine, W.F. Marine, mainly benthic, diatoms of the West Coast of the Island La Palma (Canary Islands). Vieraea 1984, 14, 11–31. [Google Scholar]
  60. Van Den Heuvel, H.M. Diatoms from El Golfo on Lanzarote (Canary Islands). Vieraea 1991, 20, 53–70. [Google Scholar]
  61. Moro Abad, L.; Martín Esquivel, J.L.; Garrido, M.J.; Izquierdo, J. (Eds.) Lista de Especies Marinas de Canarias (Algas, Hongos, Plantas y Animales); Consejería de Política Territorial y Medio Ambiente del Gobierno de Canarias: La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, 2003; 248p. [Google Scholar]
  62. Ojeda, A.; Gil-Rodríguez, M.C.; Moreira-Reyes, A. Aportaciones al conocimiento de diatomeas bentónicas y ticoplanctónicas del puerto de Santa Cruz de Tenerife (islas Canarias). Vieraea 2005, 33, 59–78. [Google Scholar]
  63. Afonso-Carrillo, J. Lista Actualizada de las Algas Marinas de las Islas Canarias, 2014; Las Palmas: Elaborada para la Sociedad Española de Ficología (SEF): La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, 2014; 64p. [Google Scholar]
  64. Aboal, M.; Alvarez-Cobelas, M.; Cambra, J.; Ector, L. Floristic list of non marine diatoms (Bacillariophyceae) of Iberian Peninsula, Balearic Islands, and Canary Islands. Updated taxonomy and bibliography. In Diatom Monograph; Witkowski, A., Ed.; A.R.G. Gantner Verlag, K.G.: Ruggell, Liechtenstein, 2003; Volume 4, 639p. [Google Scholar]
  65. Witkowski, A.; Lange-Bertalot, H.; Metzeltin, D. Diatom flora of marine coasts I. Iconogr. Diatomol. 2000, 7, 1–925. [Google Scholar]
  66. Hallegraeff, G.M.; Bolch, C.J. Transport of diatom and dinoflagellate resting spores in ships’ ballast water: Implications for plankton biogeography and aquaculture. J. Plankton Res. 1992, 14, 1067–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Villac, M.C.; Kaczmarska, I.; Ehrman, J.M. The diversity of diatom assemblages in ships’ ballast sediments: Colonization and propagule pressure on Canadian ports. J. Plankton Res. 2013, 35, 1267–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Denys, L. Morphology and taxonomy of epizoic diatoms (Epiphalaina and Tursiocola) on a sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus) stranded on the coast of Belgium. Diatom Res. 1997, 12, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Majewska, R.; Santoro, M.; Bolaños, F.; Chaves, G.; De Stefano, M. Diatoms and other epibionts associated with Olive Ridley (Lepidochelys olivacea) Sea Turtles from the Pacific coast of Costa Rica. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0130351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kaleli, A.; Krzywda, M.; Witkowski, A.; Riaux-Gobin, C.; Nadir Solak, C.; Zgłobicka, I.; Płociński, T.; Grzonka, J.; Kurzydłowski, K.J.; Car, A.; et al. A new sediment dwelling and epizoic species of Olifantiella (Bacillariophyceae), with an account on the genus ultrastructure based on Focused Ion Beam nanocuts. Fottea 2018, 18, 212–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Masó, M.; Garcés, E.; Pagès, F.; Camp, J. Drifting plastic debris as a potential vector for dispersing harmful algae bloom (HAB) species. Sci. Mar. 2003, 67, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Welch, W.R. The European oyster, Ostrea edulis, in Maine. Proc. Natl. Shellfish. Assoc. 1966, 54, 7–23. [Google Scholar]
  73. Ruesink, J.L.; Lenihan, H.S.; Trimble, A.C.; Heiman, K.W.; Micheli, F.; Byers, J.E.; Kay, M.C. Introduction of non-native oysters: Ecosystem effects and restoration implications. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2005, 36, 643–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Wolff, W.J.; Reise, K. Oyster imports as a vector for the introduction of alien species into Northern and Western European coastal waters. In Invasive Aquatic Species of Europe. Distribution, Impact and Management; Leppäkoski, E., Gollasch, S., Olenin, S., Eds.; Springer Science+Business Media: Dordrecht, The Netherlands; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2002; pp. 193–205. [Google Scholar]
  75. Massé, G.; Rincé, Y.; Cox, E.J.; Allarda, G.; Belt, S.T.; Rowland, S.J. Haslea salstonica sp. nov. and Haslea pseudostrearia sp. nov. (Bacillariophyta), two new epibenthic diatoms from the Kingsbridge estuary, United Kingdom. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris Sciences de la vie/Life Sci. 2001, 324, 617–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Brembu, T.; Winge, P.; Tooming-Klunderud, A.; Nederbragt, A.J.; Jakobsen, K.S.; Bones, A.M. The chloroplast genome of the diatom Seminavis robusta: New features introduced through multiple mechanisms of horizontal gene transfer. Mar. Genom. 2014, 16, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Ruck, E.C.; Nakov, T.; Jansen, R.K.; Theriot, E.C.; Alverson, A.J. Serial gene losses and foreign DNA underlie size and sequencevariation in the plastid genomes of diatoms. Genome Biol. Evol. 2014, 6, 644–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Imanian, B.; Pombert, J.F.; Keeling, P.J. The complete plastid genomes of the two ‘dinotoms’ Durinskia baltica and Kryptoperidinium foliaceum. PLoS ONE 2010, 19, e10711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Li, C.; Gastineau, R.; Turmel, M.; Witkowski, A.; Otis, C.; Car, A.; Lemieux, C. Complete chloroplast genome of the tiny marine diatom Nanofrustulum shiloi (Bacillariophyta) from the Adriatic Sea. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2019, 4, 3374–3376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Hildebrand, M.; Hasegawa, P.; Ord, R.W.; Thorpe, V.S.; Glass, C.A.; Volcani, B.E. Nucleotide sequence of diatom plasmids: Identification of open reading frames with similarity to site-specific recombinases. Plant Mol. Biol. 1992, 19, 759–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jacobs, J.D.; Ludwig, J.R.; Hildebrand, M.; Kukel, A.; Feng, T.Y.; Ord, R.W.; Volcani, B.E. Characterization of two circular plasmids from the marine diatom Cylindrotheca fusiformis: Plasmids hybridize to chloroplast and nuclear DNA. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1992, 233, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yu, M.; Ashworth, M.P.; Hajrah, N.H.; Khiyami, M.A.; Sabir, M.J.; Alhebshi, A.M.; Al-Malki, A.L.; Sabir, J.S.M.; Theriot, E.C.; Jansen, R.K. Evolution of the plastid genomes in diatoms. Adv. Bot. Res. 2018, 85, 129–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Oudot-Le Secq, M.-P.; Green, B.R. Complex repeat structures and novel features in the mitochondrial genomes of the diatoms Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Thalassiosira pseudonana. Gene 2011, 476, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Ravin, N.V.; Galachyants, Y.P.; Mardanov, A.V.; Beletsky, A.V.; Petrova, D.P.; Sherbakova, T.A.; Zakharova, Y.R.; Likhoshway, Y.V.; Skryabin, K.G.; Grachev, M.A. Complete sequence of the mitochondrial genome of a diatom alga Synedra acus and comparative analysis of diatom mitochondrial genomes. Curr. Genet. 2010, 56, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Villain, A.; Kojadinovic, M.; Puppo, C.; Prioretti, L.; Hubert, P.; Zhang, Y.; Grégori, G.; Roulet, A.; Roques, C.; Claverie, J.-M.; et al. Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the freshwater diatom Asterionella formosa. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2017, 2, 97–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. An, S.M.; Noh, J.H.; Lee, H.R.; Choi, D.H.; Lee, J.H.; Yang, E.C. Complete mitochondrial genome of biraphid benthic diatom, Navicula ramosissima (Naviculales, Bacillariophyceae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2016, 1, 549–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Bensasson, D.; Zhang, D.X.; Hartl, D.L.; Hewitt, G.M. Mitochondrial pseudogenes: Evolution’s misplaced witnesses. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2001, 16, 314–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Raboin, M.J.; Timko, A.F.; Howe, D.K.; Marie-Anne Félix, M.-A.; Denver, D.R. Evolution of Caenorhabditis mitochondrial genome pseudogenes and Caenorhabditis briggsae natural isolates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2010, 27, 1087–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Eimanifar, A.; Kimball, R.T.; Braun, E.L.; Ellis, J.D. The complete mitochondrial genome of the Cape honey bee, Apis mellifera capensis Esch. (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Apidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2016, 1, 817–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Mabuchi, K. Complete mitochondrial genome of the parrotfish Calotomus japonicus (Osteichthyes: Scaridae) with implications based on the phylogenetic position. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2016, 1, 643–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. Wu, X.; Xu, X.; Yu, Z.; Wei, Z.; Xia, J. Comparison of seven Crassostrea mitogenomes and phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 57, 448–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Wu, X.; Li, X.; Li, L.; Xu, X.; Xia, X.; Yu, Z. New features of Asian Crassostrea oyster mitochondrial genomes: A novel alloacceptor tRNA gene recruitment ant two novels ORFs. Gene 2012, 507, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Gastineau, R.; Nguyễn, D.H.; Lemieux, C.; Turmel, M.; Tremblay, R.; Nguyễn, V.D.; Widowati, I.; Witkowski, A.; Mouget, J.-L. The complete mitochondrial DNA of the tropical oyster Crassostrea belcheri from the Cần Giò’ mangrove in Vietnam. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2018, 3, 462–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Gastineau, R.; Wawrzyniak-Wydrowska, B.; Lemieux, C.; Turmel, M. Complete mitogenome of the invasive bivalve Rangia cuneata. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2019, 4, 2794–2795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Wang, B.; Xue, J.Y.; Li, L.; Liu, L.; Qiu, Y.L. The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the liverwort Pleurozia purpurea reveals extremely conservative mitochondrial genome evolution in liverworts. Curr. Genet. 2009, 55, 601–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Xue, J.Y.; Liu, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, B.; Qiu, Y.L. The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the hornwort Phaeoceros laevis: Retention of many ancient pseudogenes and conservative evolution of mitochondrial genomes in hornworts. Curr. Genet. 2010, 56, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Choi, M.N.; Han, M.; Lee, H.; Park, H.S.; Kim, M.Y.; Kim, J.S.; Na, Y.J.; Sim, S.W.; Park, E.J. The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Populus davidiana Dode. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2017, 2, 113–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Li, Y.; Liu, N.; Yin, H.; Liu, C.; Zhang, L.; Jin, Y.; Wang, H.; Chi, S.; Liu, T. Complete sequences of the mitochondrial DNA of the Petalonia binghamiae. Mitochondrial DNA Part B 2018, 3, 95–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Goruynov, D.V.; Goryunova, S.V.; Kuznetsova, O.I.; Logacheva, M.D.; Milyutina, I.A.; Fedorova, A.V.; Gnatov, M.S.; Troitsky, A.V. Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the “copper moss” Mielichhoferia elongata reveals independent nad7 gene functionality loss. PeerJ 2018, 6, e4350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Live light microscopy (LM) image of Haslea silbo (valve view) clone K-1285. Scale bar 10 µm.
Figure 1. Live light microscopy (LM) image of Haslea silbo (valve view) clone K-1285. Scale bar 10 µm.
Biology 10 00328 g001
Figure 2. (a): LM-DIC (Light microscopy Differential interference contrast) image of cleaned frustules of Haslea silbo clone K-1285. (b): LM-PC (Light microscopy Phase-contrast) image of cleaned frustules of Haslea silbo clone K-1285. Scale bar 10 µm.
Figure 2. (a): LM-DIC (Light microscopy Differential interference contrast) image of cleaned frustules of Haslea silbo clone K-1285. (b): LM-PC (Light microscopy Phase-contrast) image of cleaned frustules of Haslea silbo clone K-1285. Scale bar 10 µm.
Biology 10 00328 g002
Figure 3. (a): Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of complete valves of Haslea silbo clone K-1285 in external view. (b): SEM image of complete valves of Haslea silbo clone K-1285 in internal view. Scale bars 10 µm.
Figure 3. (a): Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of complete valves of Haslea silbo clone K-1285 in external view. (b): SEM image of complete valves of Haslea silbo clone K-1285 in internal view. Scale bars 10 µm.
Biology 10 00328 g003
Figure 4. (a) SEM image of Haslea silbo clone K-1285, external view of the central raphe ending and longitudinal slits. (b) SEM image of Haslea silbo clone K-1285, external view of the straight apical raphe ending. (c) SEM image of Haslea silbo clone K-1285, internal view of the central ending of the raphe, notice the squarish areolae and the thin central bar. (d) SEM image of Haslea silbo clone K-1285, internal view of the apices with the straight apical ending of the raphe (Figure 9). Scale bar 1 μm.
Figure 4. (a) SEM image of Haslea silbo clone K-1285, external view of the central raphe ending and longitudinal slits. (b) SEM image of Haslea silbo clone K-1285, external view of the straight apical raphe ending. (c) SEM image of Haslea silbo clone K-1285, internal view of the central ending of the raphe, notice the squarish areolae and the thin central bar. (d) SEM image of Haslea silbo clone K-1285, internal view of the apices with the straight apical ending of the raphe (Figure 9). Scale bar 1 μm.
Biology 10 00328 g004
Figure 5. Reduction in cell size of Haslea silbo clone K-1285 between July 2009 and January 2012. Scale bar 10 µm. (a) July 2009. (b) February 2010. (c) November 2010. (d) August 2011. (e) January 2012.
Figure 5. Reduction in cell size of Haslea silbo clone K-1285 between July 2009 and January 2012. Scale bar 10 µm. (a) July 2009. (b) February 2010. (c) November 2010. (d) August 2011. (e) January 2012.
Biology 10 00328 g005
Figure 6. LM live image of a specimen of Haslea silbo showing deformities after months in culture. Scale bar 10 µm.
Figure 6. LM live image of a specimen of Haslea silbo showing deformities after months in culture. Scale bar 10 µm.
Biology 10 00328 g006
Figure 7. (a) SEM images of specimens of Haslea silbo showing deformities after months in culture in external view. (b) SEM images of specimens of Haslea silbo showing deformities after months in culture in internal view. Scale bar 5 µm.
Figure 7. (a) SEM images of specimens of Haslea silbo showing deformities after months in culture in external view. (b) SEM images of specimens of Haslea silbo showing deformities after months in culture in internal view. Scale bar 5 µm.
Biology 10 00328 g007
Figure 8. (a) Absorbance spectra from 220 to 800 nm of the purified intracellular form of the marennine-like pigment produced by Haslea silbo depending on pH ranging from 2 to 12 (inset on the right = colour of the curve/pH). (b) focus on the isobestic point in the visible region. X-axis = wavelength (nm). Y-axis = optical density.
Figure 8. (a) Absorbance spectra from 220 to 800 nm of the purified intracellular form of the marennine-like pigment produced by Haslea silbo depending on pH ranging from 2 to 12 (inset on the right = colour of the curve/pH). (b) focus on the isobestic point in the visible region. X-axis = wavelength (nm). Y-axis = optical density.
Biology 10 00328 g008
Figure 9. (a) Absorbance spectra from 220 to 800 nm of the purified extracellular form of the marennine-like pigment produced by Haslea silbo depending on pH ranging from 2 to 12 (inset on the right = colour of the curve/pH). (b) focus on the isobestic point in the visible region. X-axis = wavelength (nm). Y-axis = optical density.
Figure 9. (a) Absorbance spectra from 220 to 800 nm of the purified extracellular form of the marennine-like pigment produced by Haslea silbo depending on pH ranging from 2 to 12 (inset on the right = colour of the curve/pH). (b) focus on the isobestic point in the visible region. X-axis = wavelength (nm). Y-axis = optical density.
Biology 10 00328 g009
Figure 10. Comparison of the in vitro Raman spectra at 514.5 nm recorded on purified blue pigments of Haslea ostrearia (HO) and Haslea silbo (HS), intracellular form (intra) and extracellular form (extra). X-axis = Wavenumber (cm−1). Y-axis=Raman Intensity (arbitrary units).
Figure 10. Comparison of the in vitro Raman spectra at 514.5 nm recorded on purified blue pigments of Haslea ostrearia (HO) and Haslea silbo (HS), intracellular form (intra) and extracellular form (extra). X-axis = Wavenumber (cm−1). Y-axis=Raman Intensity (arbitrary units).
Biology 10 00328 g010
Figure 11. Stages of sexual reproduction in Haslea silbo (×400 magnification). (a) A pair of sexually compatible gametangial cells. (b) Gametes have been formed and swelled in the left and are still to be formed in the right gametangial cell. (c) Two gametes have been formed in each gametangial cell and are ready to fuse. (d) Two zygotes resulted from gamete fusion. Note two opened gametangial frustules (four thecae). (e) A pair of gametes in a separately lying gametangial cell may be confusingly understood as a pair of zygotes, but note that only two thecae are present in this case. (f,g) Growing auxospores. (h) Initial cell (right) formed in the envelope of the fully grown auxospore (arrow); development of the next auxospore is tardy. (i) One initial cell and destroyed auxospore. (j) Two normally developed initial cells. (k) A zygote (arrow) and two aborted gametes (below), swelled due to osmotic pressure. (l) A vegetative cell.
Figure 11. Stages of sexual reproduction in Haslea silbo (×400 magnification). (a) A pair of sexually compatible gametangial cells. (b) Gametes have been formed and swelled in the left and are still to be formed in the right gametangial cell. (c) Two gametes have been formed in each gametangial cell and are ready to fuse. (d) Two zygotes resulted from gamete fusion. Note two opened gametangial frustules (four thecae). (e) A pair of gametes in a separately lying gametangial cell may be confusingly understood as a pair of zygotes, but note that only two thecae are present in this case. (f,g) Growing auxospores. (h) Initial cell (right) formed in the envelope of the fully grown auxospore (arrow); development of the next auxospore is tardy. (i) One initial cell and destroyed auxospore. (j) Two normally developed initial cells. (k) A zygote (arrow) and two aborted gametes (below), swelled due to osmotic pressure. (l) A vegetative cell.
Biology 10 00328 g011
Figure 12. Map of the mitochondrial genomes of Haslea silbo NCC456.
Figure 12. Map of the mitochondrial genomes of Haslea silbo NCC456.
Biology 10 00328 g012
Figure 13. Map of the mitochondrial genomes of Haslea silbo SZCZMV2009.
Figure 13. Map of the mitochondrial genomes of Haslea silbo SZCZMV2009.
Biology 10 00328 g013
Figure 14. MAUVE alignment of the mitochondrial genomes of Haslea silbo NCC456 (MW645081), Haslea silbo SZCZMV2009 (MW645083), and Haslea nusantara (MH681882).
Figure 14. MAUVE alignment of the mitochondrial genomes of Haslea silbo NCC456 (MW645081), Haslea silbo SZCZMV2009 (MW645083), and Haslea nusantara (MH681882).
Biology 10 00328 g014
Figure 15. Map of the plastid genomes of Haslea silbo NCC456.
Figure 15. Map of the plastid genomes of Haslea silbo NCC456.
Biology 10 00328 g015
Figure 16. Map of the plastid genomes of Haslea silbo SZCZMV2009.
Figure 16. Map of the plastid genomes of Haslea silbo SZCZMV2009.
Biology 10 00328 g016
Figure 17. MAUVE alignment of the plastid genomes of Haslea silbo NCC456 (MW645082), Haslea silbo SZCZMV2009 (MW645084), and Haslea nusantara (MH681881).
Figure 17. MAUVE alignment of the plastid genomes of Haslea silbo NCC456 (MW645082), Haslea silbo SZCZMV2009 (MW645084), and Haslea nusantara (MH681881).
Biology 10 00328 g017
Figure 18. Maximum Likelihood tree obtained from partial rbcL genes. The best tree out of 100 (score −1860.998387) was computed for 1000 bootstrap replicates.
Figure 18. Maximum Likelihood tree obtained from partial rbcL genes. The best tree out of 100 (score −1860.998387) was computed for 1000 bootstrap replicates.
Biology 10 00328 g018
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gastineau, R.; Hansen, G.; Poulin, M.; Lemieux, C.; Turmel, M.; Bardeau, J.-F.; Leignel, V.; Hardivillier, Y.; Morançais, M.; Fleurence, J.; et al. Haslea silbo, A Novel Cosmopolitan Species of Blue Diatoms. Biology 2021, 10, 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10040328

AMA Style

Gastineau R, Hansen G, Poulin M, Lemieux C, Turmel M, Bardeau J-F, Leignel V, Hardivillier Y, Morançais M, Fleurence J, et al. Haslea silbo, A Novel Cosmopolitan Species of Blue Diatoms. Biology. 2021; 10(4):328. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10040328

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gastineau, Romain, Gert Hansen, Michel Poulin, Claude Lemieux, Monique Turmel, Jean-François Bardeau, Vincent Leignel, Yann Hardivillier, Michèle Morançais, Joël Fleurence, and et al. 2021. "Haslea silbo, A Novel Cosmopolitan Species of Blue Diatoms" Biology 10, no. 4: 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10040328

APA Style

Gastineau, R., Hansen, G., Poulin, M., Lemieux, C., Turmel, M., Bardeau, J. -F., Leignel, V., Hardivillier, Y., Morançais, M., Fleurence, J., Gaudin, P., Méléder, V., Cox, E. J., Davidovich, N. A., Davidovich, O. I., Witkowski, A., Kaczmarska, I., Ehrman, J. M., Soler Onís, E., ... Mouget, J. -L. (2021). Haslea silbo, A Novel Cosmopolitan Species of Blue Diatoms. Biology, 10(4), 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10040328

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop