Next Article in Journal
Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNFα) Stimulates Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Stem Cells to Promote Intratumoral Invasion and Neovasculogenesis in the Liver of a Xenograft Model
Previous Article in Journal
Aggregated Distribution as an Explanation for the Paradox of Plankton and Collective Animal Behavior
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Red Light Resets the Expression Pattern, Phase, and Period of the Circadian Clock in Plants: A Computational Approach

1
College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
2
College of Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2022, 11(10), 1479; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11101479
Submission received: 5 September 2022 / Revised: 2 October 2022 / Accepted: 7 October 2022 / Published: 9 October 2022

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Progress in computational biology has provided a comprehensive understanding of the dynamics of the plant circadian clock. Previously proposed models of the plant circadian clock have intended to model its entrainment using white-light/dark cycles. However, these models have failed to take into account the effect of light quality on circadian rhythms, which has been experimentally observed. In this work, we developed a computational approach to characterizing the effects of light quality on plant circadian rhythms. The results demonstrated that red light can reset the expression patterns, phases, and periods of clock component genes. The circadian period, amplitude, and phase can be co-optimized for high-quality and efficient breeding.

Abstract

Recent research in the fields of biochemistry and molecular biology has shown that different light qualities have extremely different effects on plant development, and optimizing light quality conditions can speed up plant growth. Clock-regulated red-light signaling, can enhance hypocotyl elongation, and increase seedling height and flower and fruit productivity. In order to investigate the effect of red light on circadian clocks in plants, a novel computational model was established. The expression profiles of the circadian element CCA1 from previous related studies were used to fit the model. The simulation results were validated by the expression patterns of CCA1 in Arabidopsis, including wild types and mutants, and by the phase shifts of CCA1 after red-light pulse. The model was used to further explore the complex responses to various photoperiods, such as the natural white-light/dark cycles, red/white/dark cycles, and extreme 24 h photoperiods. These results demonstrated that red light can reset the expression pattern, period, and phase of the circadian clock. Finally, we identified the dependence of phase shifts on the length of red-light pulse and the minimum red-light pulse length required for producing an observable phase shift. This work provides a promising computational approach to investigating the response of the circadian clock to other light qualities.

1. Introduction

Plants have evolved a sophisticated timing mechanism, known as the circadian clock, to sense, respond to and tune to the switching between day and night due to the rotation of the earth [1,2]. This mechanism allows plants to anticipate and coordinate their biological processes with diurnal rhythms. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the expression of nearly one-third of the genome is under circadian regulation [3,4,5]. Variation in the circadian period, phase, and amplitude variations may affect the expression and stability of several circadian related outputs, such as flowering time [6]. Co-optimizing the circadian period, amplitude, and phase can help with breeding and engineering. Increasing the circadian period, and therefore, delaying the phase, confers benefits at higher latitudes for cultivation [7].
Conceptually, the circadian clock system consists of light-signal receptors, a core oscillator that maintains a roughly 24 h rhythm even in the absence of input signals, and physiological/biochemical outputs [8]. Among the various input signals, light is critical and can reset and entrain the plant circadian clock [9]. Light regulates plant circadian clock components at transcription, translation, and post-translational levels [10].
Recent studies have shown that different light qualities have extremely different effects on plant development [11]. Although plants on normal days seldom encounter light of a single wavelength, monochromatic light exposure has been applied for efficient breeding of high quality in modern plant facilities for artificial cultivation [12,13,14,15]. Breeders use supplementary lighting by fluorescent lamps and LEDs to improving light conditions. Red light serves as one of the key light-quality factors, which affects plant growth, development, product quality, and flavor [16,17]. It has been reported that pre-sowing the red-light stimulation of seeds could improve germination rate [18]. Supplementary red light leads to the earlier ripening of tomato fruit [19]. Nitrate is essential for normal plant growth but harmful for human health. The nitrate concentration in plants can be effectively reduced under red-light exposure to achieve food safety [20]. At the same time, plant growth and safety can be balanced under red illumination [21]. Irradiating table grapes with red light contributes to their extended postharvest shelf-life and improves the commercial quality of the grapes [17]. The affinity between red light and clock responses in plants can enable various physiological output processes in a timely manner to deal with light changes, including periodic or transient stimuli [22].
In the past two decades, a vast number of experiments have been conducted to reveal the molecular mechanism of the plant circadian clock response to light inputs [23,24,25,26,27,28]. Although a tremendous number of experimental facts have been accumulated, large numbers of interactions and regulations make it difficult to see the full picture of plant circadian clocks. As a recipe, mathematical models provide a convenient and efficient approach to exploring the dynamic characteristics of the network, where every clock component can be analyzed simultaneously in a quantitative and qualitative way. Models can be constructed for the circadian oscillator at the molecular, cellular, or tissular level. The pioneering work by Locke et al. [29] proposed a simple model describing the Arabidopsis central oscillator based on reciprocal regulation between CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1)/LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY) and TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1 (TOC1). As new clock components and their regulations were identified experimentally, many improved, refined, and simplified models were developed in sequence [9,10,30,31,32]. Among the notable improvements was the compact model by De Caluwé et al. [10], where functionally similar clock genes were grouped and merged into a single component according to the similar nature of their behaviors.
These models are all designed for white-light signals. However, recent studies have found that different light qualities have quite different effects on plant development, and optimizing light quality conditions can speed up plant growth. Red light exerts peculiar impact on plants by resetting and entraining the circadian clock [33,34,35]. In this paper, we developed a computational model for the specific effect of red light on the plant circadian clock. Using the model, we predicted the expression profiles of the core circadian gene CCA1 in constant red light (RR) and the phase shifts caused by red-light pulses. These predictions were confirmed with experimental data on Arabidopsis. Additionally, we validated that the red-light induced expression of CCA1 was reduced in TOC1-OX and toc1 mutant lines. To further explore the complex dynamics under different red-light/dark cycles, we compared the dynamics of the core circadian clock element CCA1 under respective RR, constant white-light (LL), and constant dark (DD) conditions, both for the wild type (WT) and mutant. We then continued to simulate the multiple circadian behaviors under respective red-light/dark (RD), red/white/dark (RLD), or white/red/dark (LRD) and non-24 h cycles, capturing the periods and phases. Finally, phase-response curves (PRCs) were drawn to identify the phase shifts produced by various lengths of red-light pulses at indicated times.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. The Molecular Mechanism of Red-Light-Entrained Plant Circadian Clock

The prototype of our model is the compact model of the plant circadian system (PCS) for the white-light-entrained plant circadian clock proposed by De Caluwé et al., hereafter referred to as the De Caluwé model [10], which includes four pairs of clock genes: CL (CCA1 and LHY), P97 (PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR 9 (PRR9) and PRR7), P51 (PRR5 and TOC1), and EL (EARLY FLOWRING 4 (ELF4) and LUX ARRYTHMO (LUX)). Two MYB-like domain transcription factors, CCA1 and LHY, are expressed at dawn. They directly inhibit the expression of early (peak expression in the morning) and late (peak expression in the evening) clock genes, as well as self-expression [36]. The PRR family members (PRR9, PRR7, PRR5, and TOC1) are expressed in order, with mutual inhibition and suppression of the expression of CCA1 and LHY [37]. At night, TOC1 inhibits the above-mentioned components, appending LUX and ELF4 [38]. We modified the De Caluwé model by switching the activation of CL in P97 to inhibition and attaching the self-inhibition of CL [35].
It was reported that ELF3 is involved in integrating red-light input into the clock, e.g., overexpressing ELF3 weakens the sensitivity of the clock entrained to red-light-mediated resetting cues [4]. On one hand, CCA1 represses the expression ELF3 in the morning by directly binding to its promoter [39]. On the other hand, ELF3 and ELF4, whose expressions are necessary for the red-light-induced expression of both CCA1 and LHY, are in turn regulated by light signaling [40,41]. Red light controls the expression of clock elements primarily through the major red-light photoreceptor phytochrome B (phyB). For instance, the overexpression of phyB stabilized ELF3 proteins [42], and Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) results revealed that phyB physically interacted with the plant clock elements CCA1, LHY, TOC1, LUX, and ELF3 [24].
Therefore, for the purpose of modeling red-light entrainment, it is necessary to complemented the ELF3 gene to the De Caluwé model. The resulting circadian clock scheme is shown in Figure 1.

2.2. Formulation of Model Equations

Based on the schematic network in Figure 1, we set out to mathematically model the dynamics of the red-light-entrained circadian clock. Instead of white-light input in the De Caluwé model [10], we replenished red-light cues to the main clock. According to experiments, red light regulates circadian clock components by affecting the rates of transcription, translation, and post-translation modification [43,44,45,46]. Protein degradation is modeled based on the fact that phyB regulates the circadian clock components through direct protein–protein interactions.
The new computational model consists of 11 ordinary differential equations (ODEs) with 57 parameters (see Supplementary Materials). Equations (S1)–(S10) depict the temporal expression of the mRNA and protein of the clock elements: CL (CCA1 and LHY), P97 (PRR9 and PRR7), P51 (PRR5 and TOC1), EL (ELF4 and LUX), and ELF3. The Equation (S11) describes the activation percentage of the light-sensitive protein P, simplified from the equation introduced by Locke et al. [29]. In modeling gene regulation, the transcription reaction follows nonlinear Hill dynamics, while the translation and degradation reactions follow the linear mass-action law. In addition, the effect of the two inhibitors A and B on C (e.g., the two inhibitors P97 and P51 on CL, see Equation (S1)) is mutually exclusive in Hill-type terms. The light cues are represented by the variables L (white light), D (darkness), and R (red light). They take values either 1 or 0 according to the light condition. To be specific, L = 1, R = 0, D = 0 when the white light is present; L = 0, R = 1, D = 0 when the red light is present; and L = 0, R = 0, D = 1 when it is in dark. A total of 35 parameters were adopted from the De Caluwé model [10]. The transcript levels of CCA1 under a skeleton photoperiod (Figure S1) were used to fit the other 22 red-light associated parameters, which were estimated by minimizing the cost function, as described in Section S2 of Supplementary Materials.

2.3. Database and Simulation Tools

The expression profiles of the circadian element CCA1 under constant red-light exposure and the skeleton photoperiod were extracted from the article of Nimmo et al. [47]. The phase shift values of the circadian element CCA1 under red-light pulses were extracted from Ohara et al. [48] using the software ImageJ (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/ (accessed on 10 September 2020), see Section S5 in Supplementary Materials for detailed steps). In the experiments, plants were illuminated with white/red light provided by LEDs (Luxeon Star 460 nm and 627 nm, respectively) at a fluence rate of 100 and 20/40 μmol m−2 s−1, respectively. The seedlings were subjectively entrained under 12 h white-light/12 h dark cycles for 5 days before being released to different light/dark photoperiods.
We simulated our ODE model utilizing Python 3.10.4, a Java-based software that is freely available for the researchers (https://www.python.org/downloads/ (accessed on 1 March 2020). The 4th-order Runge–Kutta method was used to obtain the numerical solutions of the ODEs (See Section S5 in Supplementary Materials).

3. Results

3.1. Model Predictions and Validation

3.1.1. Rhythmic Expression Patterns

The transcript levels of CCA1 under a skeleton photoperiod (Figure S1) were used to fit our model. With our model, we then simulated the rhythmic expression patterns of the clock component CCA1 under constant red light for the wild type and elf4 mutant.
According to the experimental treatment, the WT lines were entrained in 12 h white-light/12 h dark cycles for 5 days, and then, transferred to constant red light at ZT = 0 (Figure 2A) or at ZT = 12 h (Figure 2B). In both cases, the simulated curves were able to retain sustained rhythmicity, consistent with the experimental data.
The evening complex has been reported to integrate light signals to regulate the clock [34]. To verify that the clock of the elf4 mutant shifted from 12 h white-light/12 h dark cycles to constant red light, we simulated the expression of CCA1 with the same light input mode as WT (Figure 2A). The simulated results demonstrated that the elf4 mutant displayed sustained oscillation with a damped amplitude (Figure 2C).

3.1.2. Phase Shifts Caused by Red-Light Pulses

Phase, as a main characteristic of oscillators, is associated with daily variations in red-light pulse [48]. First, we examined the phase shifts of our model by simulating the phase-response curves (PRCs) (the calculation method can be found in Section S3 of Supplementary Materials). The stimulus conditions included a “red-pulse” with the red light switched on for 1 h in DD (Figure 3A) and a “dark-pulse” with the red light switched off for 2 h in RR (Figure 3B). The model had been entrained under a light/dark cycle (12 h white light/12 h dark) for 120 h before transferring to the DD or RR condition. The simulated PRC reproduced type-0 (Figure 3A) and type-1 (Figure 3B) patterns for the red-light pulse and dark pulse, respectively, capturing the essential feature of the experimental PRC.

3.1.3. Red-Light Induction of CCA1 Expression with TOC1/ELF4 Overexpression and Mutation Lines

CCA1 gene expression has been found to be induced by light signal and may have different profiles in different Arabidopsis lines [40,49]. Moreover, TOC1 and ELF4 have been reported to act negatively and positively, respectively, on CCA1/LHY expression under red-light exposure [40,46]. Here, we examined and predicted the effect of a 1 h red-light pulse on CL transcriptional levels in WT, TOC1-OX, the toc1 mutant, ELF4-OX, and the elf4 mutant. As shown in Figure 4, the CCA1 mRNA levels in WT were induced strongly after a 1 h red-light pulse. The transcriptional levels of CCA1 dropped rapidly after being released back to the dark for 1 h. A slight increase in CCA1 induction was observed in both TOC1-OX and the toc1 mutant (Figure 4A), with a clear reduction compared with WT. This result was consistent with previous work [40]. By contrast, the extents of CCA1 mRNA were predicted to be enhanced in ELF4-OX and the elf4 mutant compared with WT (Figure 4B). These results indicate that except for TOC1, ELF4 is always involved in the red-light-mediated, phytochrome-dependent regulation of CCA1/LHY expression.

3.2. Red-Light Reset of the Expression Pattern, Period, and Phase of CL and P51 under Different Photoperiods

3.2.1. Clock Reset under Red-Light Free-Running Period in WT

In the free-running simulations under constant conditions, our model displayed self-sustained circadian rhythms under RR conditions (Figure 5A), and damped oscillations under either LL (Figure 5B) or DD (Figure 5C) condition. This suggested that continuous red-light stimulation would reset the expression pattern of the circadian clock. We next attempted to recapitulate in our model the differences in clock periods and phases. The Fourier fitting gave the theoretical free-running periods 26.4 h under RR, 24.41 h under LL, and 26 h under DD. In addition, the simulated phases of CL and P51 mRNA were 2.5 h and 18.27 h under RR, 2.95 h and 15.18 h under LL, and 2.55 h and 16.66 h under DD, respectively. In addition, compared with the other two light treatments, the steady-state value of CL mRNA under LL was at the lowest level. These results showed that constant red light could reset the period and phase of the circadian clock.

3.2.2. Clock Reset under Red-Light/Dark Cycles in WT

Except for the dynamics of the clocks under free-running conditions, it is more important to identify the characteristics of clocks under varying light conditions similar to those in the natural world. Therefore, we simulated the time courses of clock component CCA1 under a short (Figure 6A), medium (Figure 6B), and long day (Figure 6C). An investigating alternative was to replace the white-light/dark cycles with the red-light/dark cycles. We then tried to describe the similarities and differences in the waveform, phase, and period. The shapes of the expression curves were obviously different. The temporal curves in white-light/dark cycles were smooth (black lines), whereas small shoulders and minor spikes appeared beside the peaks in red-light/dark cycles (red lines). The phases and periods under the distinct red-light/dark cycles are listed in Table S3 (Supplementary Materials), suggesting that the period and phase of the circadian clock could be changed via light-quality variation.

3.2.3. Clock Reset under Red-Light/Dark Cycles in Single or Double Mutant

In order to estimate the defects associated with a loss-of-function mutation of the main clock genes under red-light/dark cycles, we observed those features in single and double mutants differently to those under white-light/dark cycles. In the De Caluwé model, there are three single mutants with the same or very similar defects, and a double mutant with qualitatively similar but more pronounced version of the same phenotype. The single mutants were simulated by dividing the relevant mRNA synthesis rate by 2 (Figure 7B–D). For simulated double mutants, the synthesis rate was multiplied by 0.1 (Figure 7A).
Under white-light/dark cycles, the PRR5/TOC1 transcript had a phase advance in the cca1 LHY double mutant compared with that in WT, whereas no phase shift occurred under red-light/dark cycles. Moreover, the inhibition of CCA1 and LHY in evening-phased genes weakened or disappeared obviously under red light cycles, leading to the peak time of PRR5/TOC1 occurring at dawn (Figure 7A). Experimentally in white-light/dark cycles, the prr9 and prr7, prr5 and toc1, and elf4/lux single mutant had slight defects, both in clock gene expression levels and in periods (25 to 26 h) [50,51,52]. Inversely, the waveform, phase, and transcriptional level exhibited a great difference between the single mutant and WT when released to red-light cycles (Figure 7B–D). Phase advance (Figure 7C) and delay (Figure 7D) were observed in red-light entrainment. Similarly, red light might be more helpful for the mutant to attenuate the repression of evening-phased genes on CCA1/LHY.

3.2.4. Clock Reset under Extreme 24 h Red-Light Photoperiods

Entrainment to different photoperiods can affect the dynamics of the clock. The frequency will demultiplicate when the clock was subjected to a short cycle that is outside of its range of entrainment [10]. In this short cycle, the clock would be entrained to the short period. The model could generate this behavior (Figure S1A,B). In both the wild type and elf3 mutant plant clock oscillated with a 12 h period following a switch from standard 24 h (12 h white light/12 h dark) conditions to 12 h (6 h white light/6 h dark) in keeping with the experimental data. Additionally, this result overturned the previous simulation, which reported that the frequency under the short period was close to the integer multiple of the free-running period [53]. The elf3 mutation had little effect on the relative abundance of CCA1 mRNA compared with that in the wild type.
Lightly affected/rhythmic elf3 mutant was immediately entrained to the short period under the white-/red-light cycle, in the same way as that in the wild-type (Figure S1C). Compared with its expression in the white-light/dark short cycle, the CCA1 transcript was maintained at a lower level, especially in the elf3 mutant line (Figure S1D). This result was owing to ELF3 expression, which was essential for CCA1/LHY to generate highly abundant oscillation under red light [41].
Using our model, we can simulate the clock dynamics under different red-light photoperiods on the heels of exposure to a 24 h cycle. The temporal evolutions of CL (CCA1/LHY) (Figure 8A) and P51 (PRR5/TOC1) (Figure 8B) mRNA levels were simulated during a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle followed by red-light photoperiods ranging from 3 to 21 h. The length of the red-light period had a significant effect on the expression waveform of clock components and their expression phases. We then calculated the shift differences between the anterior phase and posterior phase (Figure 8C,D; Table S3) on day 5 of entrainment. The phase changes in CCA1 mRNA increased linearly in the red-light length. Nevertheless, but with a jump on the long red-light day. The phase of the first peak of TOC1 expression after release into short red-light entrainment was largely independent of the preceding entraining conditions, and was different from the downward parabolic type on the long red-light day. On the other hand, the dynamics under constant red light after exposure to a 24 h cycle, regardless of the length of entraining light period, was simulated (Figure S2). The white-light/dark cycle in the photoperiods ranged from 3 to 21 h, followed by release into continuous red light. It was seen that the length of white light had little effect on the expression waveform of clock components, but produced phase shifts. This result was consistence with the white-light free-running pattern [54].

3.2.5. The Expression Pattern of CCA1 Determined by the Orders of Red-Light Input

In order to investigate the influence of different light modes and light quality on clock expression, we selected red- and white-light inputs with different light lengths and orders for numerical simulation. The simulation results showed that the input order of red light and white light affected the expression pattern of the clock. The order of red/white light pulses and light pulse lengths (ranging from 3 h to 9 h) did not affect the period of the clock (Table S3). From the simulated waveforms, the expression of the clock component CCA1 transited smoothly from white light to red light (Figure 9B), while there were several spikes as red-light input preceded white light (Figure 9A).

3.2.6. Phase Shifts Controlled by the Moments and Lengths of Red-Light Stimulation

In order to further explore dependence of phase shift on the stimulus time and the length of the red pulse on the phase shift in the white-light/dark cycle, the system was stimulated at the indicated times with red-light pulses of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2, 2.25, 2.5, 2.75, 3, 3.25, 3.5, 3.75, and 4 h (Figure 10A). The observed phase shifts were characterized as type-1 resetting, consistent with experimental observations. Phase delays occurred around the time when darkness switched to white light, and phase advances took place around the time when white light turned to darkness. Simultaneously, we calculated the minimum pulse length of the phase shift at diverse stimulus times. The simulation results revealed that red-light stimulation of different durations (within 4 h) in ZT1-ZT5 would not alter the phase (Figure 10B). The longest duration of red-light stimulus to produce an explicit phase shift was at ZT6. If the red pulse duration was 0.25 h, the phase of the clock component remained unchanged regardless of the stimulus time.

4. Discussion

In this study, we present a computational model to characterize the effect of red light on the plant circadian clock. This model is capable of reproducing key characteristics of the Arabidopsis thaliana circadian clock, including wild-type and mutant phenotypes under constant red-light and white-light/dark skeleton photoperiods. The model can be applied to the circadian clock under diverse artificial red-light environments, such as red-light/dark cycles, red-light/white-light/dark cycles and red-light pulses [33]. In our model, the De Caluwé model as a whole and the additional ELF3 gene forms a new feedback loop, which requires 2 additional equations to describe. This extension structure allows us to capture more complex response behavior of the circadian clock for various red-light inputs (Figure 2 and Figure S3), whereas the De Caluwé model is only suit for white light photoperiods
In the negative-feedback loop among CCA1/LHY, PRR9/PRR7, and PRR5/TOC1, the expression of CCA1/LHY mRNA was supposed to be activated and inhibited in the toc1 mutant and TOC1-OX lines. However, a clear reduction in the extent of CCA1 induction was observed both in the mutant and overexpression lines after 1 h of red-light pulse (Figure 4A), suggesting that PRR9/PRR7 might be able to enhance the suppression of CCA1 depending on the changes in red-light quality. This is consistent with the proposal that PRR9/PRR7 appears to be involved in red-light quality-dependent circadian entrainment [55]. On the contrary, the elf4 mutant displayed higher activation of CCA1 in response to the red-light pulse (Figure 4B). There might be an underlying clock defect that affects the gating of this red-light response pathway [52]. We speculate that the inhibition of CCA1 abundance by PRR9/PRR7 would be reduced in the elf4 mutant.
Under the constant red-light, the plant circadian clock retains a robust periodic oscillation, in contract to a damped oscillation under constant white light or constant dark. We proved the reliability of the numerical simulations through mathematical analysis. The root of the nonlinear equation system was first solved for the steady-state, and the eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix at steady-state through eigenvalue analysis, were found (See Section S3 in Supplementary Materials). Since there are eigenvalues with positive real parts, it means that the steady-state is unstable. At the same time, a pair of conjugate complex roots indicates that the system can retain robust oscillation.
An important task is to determine the conditions to assure sustained oscillations in clock gene expression under constant red light. Hopf bifurcation (Figure S4) and parameter sensitivity analysis (Figure S5) were carried out to identify the dependence of dynamics of the clock on parameters. It suggested that oscillations occur for suitable range of the EL protein degradation rate d 4 R [56]. The CL mRNA of system moved first from the stable steady state with d 4 R less than 0.1 to the unstable steady state in the interval from 0.1 to 1.2, and then to the stable steady state again as d 4 R increased (Figure S4A). The P51 mRNA level presented as a function of parameter d 4 R , oscillating in the umbrella-shaped area (Figure S4B), as well. And the corresponding periods decreased as d 4 R increased and eventually flatten out in less than 20 h (Figure S4C). The time evolutions for d 4 R in different domains were shown in Figure S4D–F.
Phase sensitivity analysis (Figure S5A) results demonstrated that the degradation rates of CL mRNA ( k 1 R ), CL protein ( d 1 R ), P97 protein ( d 2 R ), and EL protein ( d 4 R ) were sensitive to phase under RR. Period sensitivity analysis (Figure S5B) results showed that the ELF3-induced synthesis rate of CL mRNA ( v 1 B ); red-light-induced synthesis rate of ELF3 mRNA ( v 5 R ); degradation rates of CL mRNA ( k 1 R ), ELF3 mRNA ( k 5 ), CL protein ( d 1 R ), EL protein ( d 4 R ) and ELF3 protein ( d 5 R ); and translation rate of ELF3 ( p 5 ) were sensitive to period under RR. Based on the sensitivity regions of the parameter values, we can extend the red-light acclimation model of Arabidopsis to different varieties of the same plant or even other plants. Red light would affect the variations in protein degradation rates in a proteasome-dependent pathway [57]. The dynamical behaviors of different red-light-acclimated plants can be recognized through the fluctuation of degradation rate constants of proteins within the sensitivity regions (Figure S6).
To further study the responses, the role of multiple light inputs in seasonal adaptation could be explored via a systematic analysis of entrainment in different photoperiods [58] and other monochromatic light entrainments, such as blue light [59]. Red and blue light are the two most effective waves for plant photosynthesis [60]. Blue light has different effects on the circadian clock. For example, the period of the clock that is much less sensitive to blue light than to red light [61]. Additionally, the phases and expression patterns of core oscillators under blue-light pulses were different from those under red-light pulses [47,48]. The robustness of the circadian oscillations in the presence of both molecular and environmental variability can readily be investigated through stochastic simulations [62,63].
This study may contribute to the understanding of circadian entrainment in a natural environment. Theoretical studies show that the color of sunlight changes throughout the day. For example, during the day, sunlight contains more blue than red light. At sunset (and sunrise), sunlight has more red light than blue light. According to the actual measurement of the sunlight and sky-light spectrum in an urban area, the peak value of the solar spectrum changes regularly in a day under general atmospheric conditions, from 666 nm at sunrise to 530 nm during the daytime, and then, to 642 nm at sunset [44]. Based on the difference between the spectrum and the local sunrise and sunset times (sunrise, 6:00–8:00; daytime, 8:00–16:50; sunset, 16:50–17:32), the natural sunlight input is regarded as a red light/white light/red light/dark cycle.
To recapitulate the percentage of the wavelengths in a diurnal cycle, we added 2 h of red-light stimulation at dawn and 1 h red-light stimulation at dusk in 12 h white light/12 h dark cycles (Figure S3). This gave no effect on the expression mode and phase of CL (CCA1/LHY), but an explicit delay in the phase of P51 (PRR5/TOC1) transcript. Moreover, despite the normal peak in the beginning of night, an additional peak of P51 occurred at the end of sunrise red light, which verified the observation that P51 may have several expression-peak phases under a subjective natural light cycle [64]. The model can be applied to multiple-light entrainment in various regions with different latitudes and longitudes.
For the sake of simplicity, our model assumes that the photosensitive protein phyB only responds to red light. However, circadian clocks are sensitive to different light qualities, such as far red light and blue light [65]. On the other hand, light intensity is a critical factor in the behaviors of circadian oscillators [5]. For example, in a clock element mutant in various intensities of red light may lead to arrhythmia, whereas blue light may induce a faster clock [49]. In addition, circadian clock feedback to the red-light-photosensitive protein phyB needs to be incorporated into the model in an appropriate way based on experimental facts [66]. Based on the red-light-entrained model with precise data on diurnal changes in the spectrum, we may further understand how plants work in the natural environment.

5. Conclusions

Genes subjected to circadian clock regulation can be entrained under various modes of light input. Genes involved in the core oscillator respond to red-light changes by adjusting their expression patterns, periods, and phases. Currently available models of the plant circadian clock are limited, especially in red-light input, and our red-light-entrained model is an important supplement. This paper mainly aimed to construct a schematic structure of the circadian clock response to red-light signals, seek a set of optimal parameters, conduct model-reliability analysis, and introduce the red-light-sensitive protein to the circadian clock. Then, the expression profiles of the core circadian element CCA1 and phase shifts under red-light pulses were validated with experimental data from previous studies. Using the model, dynamics, and phase properties of the circadian clock under various photoperiods were further explored, suggesting that expression pattern, period, and phase of the circadian clock could be reset. Some predicted phenomena need to be confirmed in the subsequent experiment of the future research.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology11101479/s1, Figure S1: The time evolution of CCA1 mRNA levels in the skeleton photoperiod; Figure S2: CCA1/LHY and PRR5/TOC1 expression profiles and phase shift for various photoperiods; Figure S3: Simulated expression profiles in the subjective natural-light condition; Figure S4: Bifurcation analysis of steady state and sustained oscillation in CL and P51 expression, as well as the periods in the oscillation region; Figure S5: Sensitivity analysis for the phase and period of CCA1 mRNA under constant red light; Figure S6. Under constant red light, validation of the correct expressions of clock genes; Table S1: Core variables for the red-light entrainment of plant circadian clock model; Table S2: Parameter values used in numerical simulations; Table S3: The predicted periods and phases of clock oscillation system induced by diverse red-light cycles. References [10,67,68,69,70,71] are cited in Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

X.Y. and X.H. designed the study. T.H., X.Y., Y.W. and Y.S. built the computational model. T.H., Y.W. and Y.S. performed numerical simulations. T.H. and X.Y. wrote the manuscript. X.Y. and X.H. finalized the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

X.Y. was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 11171155, no. 11871268) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (no. BK20171370). Y.S. was supported by the Undergraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship of China (no. 202110307045). X.H. was supported by the Key Projects of the National Key Research and Development Plan (2017YFD0101803), the State Key Program of the Natural Science Foundation of China (31330067), and the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-23-A-06).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Masuda, K.; Tokuda, I.T.; Nakamichi, N.; Fukuda, H. The singularity response reveals entrainment properties of the plant circadian clock. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chiang, C.; Aas, O.; Jetmundsen, M.; Lee, Y.; Torre, S.; Fløistad, I.; Olsen, J. Day extension with far-red light enhances growth of subalpine fir (Abies Lasiocarpa (Hooker) Nuttall) seedlings. Forests 2018, 9, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. McClung, C.R. Wheels within wheels: New transcriptional feedback loops in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. F1000Prime Rep. 2014, 6, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Covington, M.F.; Panda, S.; Liu, X.L.; Strayer, C.A.; Wagner, D.R.; Kay, S.A. ELF3 modulates resetting of the circadian clock in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 1305–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Bordage, S.; Sullivan, S.; Laird, J.; Millar, A.J.; Nimmo, H.G. Organ specificity in the plant circadian system is explained by different light inputs to the shoot and root clocks. New Phytol. 2016, 212, 136–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Steed, G.; Ramirez, D.C.; Hannah, M.A.; Webb, A.A.R. Chronoculture, harnessing the circadian clock to improve crop yield and sustainability. Science 2021, 372, eabc9141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Greenham, K.; Lou, P.; Puzey, J.R.; Kumar, G.; Arnevik, C.; Farid, H.; Willis, J.H.; McClung, C.R. Geographic variation of plant circadian clock function in natural and agricultural settings. J. Biol. Rhythm. 2017, 32, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Creux, N.; Harmer, S. Circadian rhythms in plants. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2019, 11, a034611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Fogelmark, K.; Troein, C. Rethinking transcriptional activation in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2014, 10, e1003705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. De Caluwé, J.; Xiao, Q.; Hermans, C.; Verbruggen, N.; Leloup, J.C.; Gonze, D. A compact model for the complex plant circadian clock. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ye, J.H.; Lv, Y.Q.; Liu, S.R.; Jin, J.; Wang, Y.F.; Wei, C.L.; Zhao, S.Q. Effects of light intensity and spectral composition on the transcriptome profiles of leaves in shade grown tea plants (Camellia Sinensis L.) and regulatory network of flavonoid biosynthesis. Molecules 2021, 26, 5836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Seif, M.; Aliniaeifard, S.; Arab, M.; Mehrjerdi, M.Z.; Shomali, A.; Fanourakis, D.; Li, T.; Woltering, E. Monochromatic red light during plant growth decreases the size and improves the functionality of stomata in chrysanthemum. Funct. Plant Biol. 2021, 48, 515–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mizuno, T.; Amaki, W.; Watanabe, H. Effects of monochromatic light irradiation by led on the growth and anthocyanin contents in leaves of cabbage seedlings. Acta Hortic. 2011, 907, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Materová, Z.; Sobotka, R.; Zdvihalová, B.; Oravec, M.; Nezval, J.; Karlický, V.; Vrábl, D.; Štroch, M.; Špunda, V. Monochromatic green light induces an aberrant accumulation of geranylgeranyled ghlorophylls in plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 116, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Asahina, M.; Tamaki, Y.; Sakamoto, T.; Shibata, K.; Nomura, T.; Yokota, T. Blue light-promoted rice leaf bending and unrolling are due to up-regulated brassinosteroid biosynthesis genes accompanied by accumulation of castasterone. Phytochemistry 2014, 104, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Shamsabad, M.R.M.; Esmaeilizadeh, M.; Roosta, H.R.; Dąbrowski, P.; Telesiński, A.; Kalaji, H.M. Supplemental light application can improve the growth and development of strawberry plants under salinity and alkalinity stress conditions. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 9272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nassarawa, S.S.; Belwal, T.; Javed, M.; Luo, Z. Influence of the red LEDs light irradiation on the quality and chemical attributes of postharvest table grape (Vitis Vinifera L.) during storage. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2022, 15, 1436–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dziwulska-Hunek, A.; Szymanek, M.; Stadnik, J. Impact of pre-sowing red light treatment of sweet corn seeds on the quality and quantity of yield. Agriculture 2020, 10, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Song, S.; Su, W.; Hao, Y.; Liu, H. Supplementary red light results in the earlier ripening of tomato fruit depending on ethylene production. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 175, 104044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lillo, C.; Appenroth, K.J. Light regulation of nitrate reductase in higher plants: Which photoreceptors are involved? Plant Biol. 2001, 3, 455–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bian, Z.H.; Yang, Q.C.; Liu, W.K. Effects of light quality on the accumulation of phytochemicals in vegetables produced in controlled environments: A review: Effects of light on vegetable phytochemicals. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2015, 95, 869–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gardner, M.J.; Hubbard, K.E.; Hotta, C.T.; Dodd, A.N.; Webb, A.A.R. How plants tell the time. Biochem. J. 2006, 397, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Yanovsky, M.J.; Mazzella, M.A.; Whitelam, G.C.; Casal, J.J. Resetting of the circadian clock by phytochromes and cryptochromes in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Rhythms 2001, 16, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xu, X.; Xie, Q.; McClung, C.R. Robust circadian rhythms of gene expression in Brassica Rapa tissue culture. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 841–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Xiang, Y.; Sapir, T.; Rouillard, P.; Ferrand, M.; Jiménez-Gómez, J.M. Interaction between photoperiod and variation in circadian rhythms in tomato. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wenden, B.; Kozma-Bognár, L.; Edwards, K.D.; Hall, A.J.W.; Locke, J.C.W.; Millar, A.J. Light inputs shape the Arabidopsis circadian system: Plant clocks with limited light input. Plant J. 2011, 66, 480–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, Y.; Yuan, L.; Su, T.; Wang, Q.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, S.; Jia, Q.; Yu, G.; Fu, Y.; Cheng, Q.; et al. Light- and Temperature-entrainable Circadian Clock in Soybean Development. Plant Cell Environ. 2020, 43, 637–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Oakenfull, R.J.; Davis, S.J. Shining a light on the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 2571–2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Locke, J.C.W.; Millar, A.J.; Turner, M.S. Modelling genetic networks with noisy and varied experimental data: The circadian clock in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Theor. Biol. 2005, 234, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pokhilko, A.; Fernández, A.P.; Edwards, K.D.; Southern, M.M.; Halliday, K.J.; Millar, A.J. The clock gene circuit in Arabidopsis includes a repressilator with additional feedback loops. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2012, 8, 574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pokhilko, A.; Mas, P.; Millar, A.J. Modelling the widespread effects of TOC1 signalling on the plant circadian clock and its outputs. BMC Syst. Biol. 2013, 7, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Greenwood, M.; Tokuda, I.T.; Locke, J.C.W. A spatial model of the plant circadian clock reveals design pinciples for coordinated timing. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2022, 18, e10140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lin, K.H.; Huang, M.Y.; Huang, W.D.; Hsu, M.H.; Yang, Z.W.; Yang, C.M. The effects of red, blue, and white light-emitting diodes on the growth, development, and edible quality of hydroponically grown Lettuce (Lactuca Sativa L. Var. Capitata). Sci. Hortic. 2013, 150, 86–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Huang, H.; Nusinow, D.A. Into the Evening: Complex interactions in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Trends Genet. 2016, 32, 674–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yeom, M.; Kim, H.; Lim, J.; Shin, A.Y.; Hong, S.; Kim, J.I.; Nam, H.G. How do phytochromes transmit the light quality information to the circadian clock in Arabidopsis? Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 1701–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kamioka, M.; Takao, S.; Suzuki, T.; Taki, K.; Higashiyama, T.; Kinoshita, T.; Nakamichi, N. Direct repression of evening genes by CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED1 in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell 2016, 28, 696–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Gendron, J.M.; Pruneda-Paz, J.L.; Doherty, C.J.; Gross, A.M.; Kang, S.E.; Kay, S.A. Arabidopsis circadian clock protein, TOC1, is a DNA-Binding transcription factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 3167–3172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Huang, W.; Pérez-García, P.; Pokhilko, A.; Millar, A.J.; Antoshechkin, I.; Riechmann, J.L.; Mas, P. Mapping the core of the Arabidopsis circadian clock defines the network structure of the oscillator. Science 2012, 336, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lu, S.X.; Webb, C.J.; Knowles, S.M.; Kim, S.H.J.; Wang, Z.; Tobin, E.M. CCA1 and ELF3 interact in the control of hypocotyl length and flowering time in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158, 1079–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kikis, E.A.; Khanna, R.; Quail, P.H. ELF4 is a phytochrome-regulated component of a negative−feedback loop involving the central oscillator components CCA1 and LHY: ELF4 and Rc induction of the circadian clock. Plant J. 2005, 44, 300–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, X.L.; Covington, M.F.; Fankhauser, C.; Chory, J.; Wagner, D.R. ELF3 encodes a circadian clock-regulated nuclear protein that functions in an Arabidopsis PHYB signal transduction pathway. Plant Cell 2001, 13, 1293–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Nieto, C.; López-Salmerón, V.; Davière, J.-M.; Prat, S. ELF3-PIF4 interaction regulates plant growth independently of the evening complex. Curr. Biol. 2015, 25, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Anna, B.B.; Grzegorz, B.; Marek, K.; Piotr, G.; Marcin, F. Exposure to high-intensity light systemically induces micro-transcriptomic changes in Arabidopsis thaliana roots. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Franklin, K.A.; Whitelam, G.C. Light signals, phytochromes and cross-talk with other environmental cues. J. Exp. Bot. 2003, 55, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Liu, X.Y.; Xue, C.; Kong, L.; Xu, Z.G.; Hua, J. Interactive effects of light quality and temperature on Arabidopsis growth and immunity. Plant Cell Physiol. 2020, 61, 933–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pay, M.L.; Kim, D.W.; Somers, D.E.; Kim, J.K.; Foo, M. Modelling of plant circadian clock for characterizing hypocotyl growth under different light quality conditions. In Silico. Plants 2022, 4, diac001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nimmo, H.G.; Laird, J.; Bindbeutel, R.; Nusinow, D.A. The evening complex is central to the difference between the circadian clocks of Arabidopsis thaliana shoots and roots. Physiol Plant. 2020, 169, 442–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ohara, T.; Fukuda, H.; Tokuda, I.T. An extended mathematical model for reproducing the phase response of Arabidopsis thaliana under various light conditions. J. Theor. Biol. 2015, 382, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Más, P.; Alabadí, D.; Yanovsky, M.J.; Oyama, T.; Kay, S.A. Dual role of TOC1 in the control of circadian and photomorphogenic responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 223–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Ito, S.; Niwa, Y.; Nakamichi, N.; Kawamura, H.; Yamashino, T.; Mizuno, T. Insight into missing genetic links between two evening-expressed pseudo-response regulator genes TOC1 and PRR5 in the circadian clock-controlled Circuitry in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008, 49, 201–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Salomé, P.A.; McClung, C.R. PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR 7 and 9 are partially redundant genes essential for the temperature responsiveness of the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 791–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. McWatters, H.G.; Kolmos, E.; Hall, A.; Doyle, M.R.; Amasino, R.M.; Gyula, P.; Nagy, F.; Millar, A.J.; Davis, S.J. ELF4 is required for oscillatory properties of the circadian clock. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Anwer, M.U.; Boikoglou, E.; Herrero, E.; Hallstein, M.; Davis, A.M.; James, G.V.; Nagy, F.; Davis, S.J. Natural variation reveals that intracellular distribution of ELF3 protein is associated with function in the circadian clock. eLife 2014, 3, e02206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Edwards, K.D.; Akman, O.E.; Knox, K.; Lumsden, P.J.; Thomson, A.W.; Brown, P.E.; Pokhilko, A.; Kozma-Bognar, L.; Nagy, F.; Rand, D.A.; et al. Quantitative analysis of regulatory flexibility under changing environmental conditions. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2010, 6, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Nakamichi, N.; Kita, M.; Ito, S.; Yamashino, T.; Mizuno, T. PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATORS, PRR9, PRR7 and PRR5, together play essential roles close to the circadian clock of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005, 46, 686–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Pagliarini, S.; Korobeinikov, A. A mathematical model of marine bacteriophage evolution. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2018, 5, 171661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Niwa, Y.; Matsuo, T.; Onai, K.; Kato, D.; Tachikawa, M.; Ishiura, M. Phase-resetting mechanism of the circadian clock in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 13666–13671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Schmal, C.; Myung, J.; Herzel, H.; Bordyugov, G. A theoretical study on seasonality. Front. Neurol. 2015, 6, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Lopez, L.; Fasano, C.; Perrella, G.; Facella, P. Cryptochromes and the circadian clock: The story of a very complex relationship in a spinning world. Genes 2021, 12, 672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hogewoning, S.W.; Trouwborst, G.; Maljaars, H.; Poorter, H.; van Ieperen, W.; Harbinson, J. Blue light dose-responses of leaf photosynthesis, morphology, and chemical composition of cucumis sativus grown under different combinations of red and blue light. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, 3107–3117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nimmo, H.G. Entrainment of Arabidopsis roots to the light:dark cycle by light piping: Light piping entrains roots. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 1742–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Guerriero, M.L.; Pokhilko, A.; Fernández, A.P.; Halliday, K.J.; Millar, A.J.; Hillston, J. Stochastic properties of the plant circadian clock. J. R. Soc. Interface 2012, 9, 744–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Guerriero, M.L.; Akman, O.E.; van Ooijen, G. Stochastic models of cellular circadian rhythms in plants help to understand the impact of noise on robustness and clock structure. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Song, Y.H.; Kubota, A.; Kwon, M.S.; Covington, M.F.; Lee, N.; Taagen, E.R.; Cintrón, D.L.; Hwang, D.Y.; Akiyama, R.; Hodge, S.K.; et al. Molecular basis of flowering under natural long-day conditions in Arabidopsis. Nat. Plants 2018, 4, 824–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Balcerowicz, M. PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTORS at the interface of light and temperature signalling. Physiol. Plant. 2020, 169, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Hiltbrunner, A. Phytochromes: Methods and Protocols, 1st ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 179–190. [Google Scholar]
  67. Hoops, S.; Hontecillas, R.; Abedi, V.; Leber, A.; Philipson, C.; Carbo, A.; Bassaganya-Riera, J. Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs) Based Modeling. In Computational Immunology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 63–78. [Google Scholar]
  68. Leloup, J.C.; Goldbeter, A. Modeling the mammalian circadian clock: Sensitivity analysis and multiplicity of oscillatory mechanisms. J. Theor. Biol. 2004, 230, 541–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. MacGregor, D.R.; Gould, P.; Foreman, J.; Griffiths, J.; Bird, S.; Page, R.; Stewart, K.; Steel, G.; Young, J.; Paszkiewicz, K.; et al. HIGH EXPRESSION OF OSMOTICALLY RESPONSIVE GENES1 is required for circadian periodicity through the promotion of nucleo-cytoplasmic MRNA export in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2013, 25, 4391–4404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Zhang, R.; Gonze, D.; Hou, X.; You, X.; Goldbeter, A. A computational model for the cold response pathway in plants. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 591073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hairer, E.; Lubich, C.; Wanner, G. Geometric Numerical Integration: Structure-Preserving Algorithms for Ordinary Differential Equations, 2nd ed.; Springer Series in Computational Mathematics; Springer: Berlin, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 27–50. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Schematic red-light-responsive circadian network in Arabidopsis. The genes in one box have similar expression profiles, regulators, targets, and defects in loss-of-function mutant lines. Solid lines with blunt ends indicate that genes function as repressors in the negative-feedback loops. Dotted lines and arrows indicate genes acting as activators in the regulatory network. The lightning and moon symbols represent light and darkness, respectively. CL (CCA1/LHY) and P97 (PRR9/PRR7) are morning-peaking genes, and the rest are afternoon-peaking or night-peaking genes. The dotted lines indicate regulatory relationships only under red light.
Figure 1. Schematic red-light-responsive circadian network in Arabidopsis. The genes in one box have similar expression profiles, regulators, targets, and defects in loss-of-function mutant lines. Solid lines with blunt ends indicate that genes function as repressors in the negative-feedback loops. Dotted lines and arrows indicate genes acting as activators in the regulatory network. The lightning and moon symbols represent light and darkness, respectively. CL (CCA1/LHY) and P97 (PRR9/PRR7) are morning-peaking genes, and the rest are afternoon-peaking or night-peaking genes. The dotted lines indicate regulatory relationships only under red light.
Biology 11 01479 g001
Figure 2. The expression profiles of the core circadian element CCA1 under constant red light (RR). Wild-type (WT) and mutant lines were entrained for 120 h under white-light/dark cycles. (A) The WT lines were transferred into RR at ZT0. (B) The WT lines were transferred into RR at ZT12. (C) The elf4 mutant lines were transferred into RR at ZT0. The basic parameters are shown in Supplementary Table S2. In the elf4 mutant simulation, the maximum synthesis rate in white light ( v 4 L ) and red light ( v 4 R ) of EL mRNA are respective 0.294 and 2.63 versus 1.47 and 6.1 in WT. The grey and red bars represent darkness and red-light treatment, respectively. The black solid lines and the blue circles indicate simulated expression (Sim.) and experimental data (Exp.), respectively. Transcript levels are means ± SD for n = 8~26 clusters of Arabidopsis plants in 3~6 biological replicates.
Figure 2. The expression profiles of the core circadian element CCA1 under constant red light (RR). Wild-type (WT) and mutant lines were entrained for 120 h under white-light/dark cycles. (A) The WT lines were transferred into RR at ZT0. (B) The WT lines were transferred into RR at ZT12. (C) The elf4 mutant lines were transferred into RR at ZT0. The basic parameters are shown in Supplementary Table S2. In the elf4 mutant simulation, the maximum synthesis rate in white light ( v 4 L ) and red light ( v 4 R ) of EL mRNA are respective 0.294 and 2.63 versus 1.47 and 6.1 in WT. The grey and red bars represent darkness and red-light treatment, respectively. The black solid lines and the blue circles indicate simulated expression (Sim.) and experimental data (Exp.), respectively. Transcript levels are means ± SD for n = 8~26 clusters of Arabidopsis plants in 3~6 biological replicates.
Biology 11 01479 g002
Figure 3. Phase shift validation. (A) WT lines were first entrained in continuous darkness; then, a red-light pulse was imposed for 1 h at an indicated time within 24 h. (B) WT lines were first exposed to constant red light with a 2 h dark shock at an indicated time. Black dots denote the simulated PRC (Sim.), and blue triangle and dotted line denote the experimental PRC (Exp.). Phase shift values are means ± SD in three biological replicates.
Figure 3. Phase shift validation. (A) WT lines were first entrained in continuous darkness; then, a red-light pulse was imposed for 1 h at an indicated time within 24 h. (B) WT lines were first exposed to constant red light with a 2 h dark shock at an indicated time. Black dots denote the simulated PRC (Sim.), and blue triangle and dotted line denote the experimental PRC (Exp.). Phase shift values are means ± SD in three biological replicates.
Biology 11 01479 g003
Figure 4. The red-light-mediated induction of CCA1 in WT, TOC1-OX, toc1-mu, ELF4-OX, and elf4-mu. (A) The simulated expression of CL mRNA in WT, TOC1-OX, and toc1-mu. (B) The simulated expression of CL mRNA in WT, ELF4-OX, and elf4-mu. In the experiments, plants maintained for 5 days in the dark were treated for 1 h with red-light stimulation (RL; 40 μmol m−2 s−1) followed by 1 h dark exposure. Transcript levels were simulated in WT with the following basic parameters: TOC1-OX (the synthesis rate v 3 was doubled), toc1-mu (the synthesis rate v 3 was halved), ELF4-OX (the synthesis rates v 4 L and v 4 R were doubled), and elf4-mu (the synthesis rates v 4 L and v 4 R were halved). WT, TOC1-OX, toc1-mu, ELF4-OX, and elf4-mu indicate the wild type, the overexpression of TOC1, the toc1 mutant, the overexpression of ELF4, and the elf4 mutant, respectively.
Figure 4. The red-light-mediated induction of CCA1 in WT, TOC1-OX, toc1-mu, ELF4-OX, and elf4-mu. (A) The simulated expression of CL mRNA in WT, TOC1-OX, and toc1-mu. (B) The simulated expression of CL mRNA in WT, ELF4-OX, and elf4-mu. In the experiments, plants maintained for 5 days in the dark were treated for 1 h with red-light stimulation (RL; 40 μmol m−2 s−1) followed by 1 h dark exposure. Transcript levels were simulated in WT with the following basic parameters: TOC1-OX (the synthesis rate v 3 was doubled), toc1-mu (the synthesis rate v 3 was halved), ELF4-OX (the synthesis rates v 4 L and v 4 R were doubled), and elf4-mu (the synthesis rates v 4 L and v 4 R were halved). WT, TOC1-OX, toc1-mu, ELF4-OX, and elf4-mu indicate the wild type, the overexpression of TOC1, the toc1 mutant, the overexpression of ELF4, and the elf4 mutant, respectively.
Biology 11 01479 g004
Figure 5. The temporal evolution of circadian clock in free-running period. The WT lines were entrained in white-light/dark cycles (12 h light/12 h dark) for 5 d, and then, transferred to 24 h constant light on day 5. (A) The WT lines were transferred into RR at ZT0. (B) The WT lines were transferred into LL at ZT0. (C) The WT lines were transferred into DD at ZT12. The grey, red, and white bands represent subjective continuous darkness (DD), constant red light (RR), and constant white light (LL), respectively. The solid and dashed lines represent the simulated transcript levels of CL (CCA1/LHY) and P51 (PRR5/TOC1) under different free-running conditions. All values are normalized to their respective maxima.
Figure 5. The temporal evolution of circadian clock in free-running period. The WT lines were entrained in white-light/dark cycles (12 h light/12 h dark) for 5 d, and then, transferred to 24 h constant light on day 5. (A) The WT lines were transferred into RR at ZT0. (B) The WT lines were transferred into LL at ZT0. (C) The WT lines were transferred into DD at ZT12. The grey, red, and white bands represent subjective continuous darkness (DD), constant red light (RR), and constant white light (LL), respectively. The solid and dashed lines represent the simulated transcript levels of CL (CCA1/LHY) and P51 (PRR5/TOC1) under different free-running conditions. All values are normalized to their respective maxima.
Biology 11 01479 g005
Figure 6. Different dynamic behaviors of the clock elements CL and P51 under red-light cycles in comparison with those under white-light cycles. The simulated expression profiles of CL (CCA1/LHY) and P51 (PRR5/TOC1) mRNA on (A) short days (8 h light/16 h dark), (B) intermediate-light-length days (12 h light/12 h dark), and (C) long days (16 h light/8 h dark). R, L, and D indicate red light, white light, and dark, respectively. The solid and dashed lines represent the simulated transcript levels of CL (CCA1/LHY) and P51 (PRR5/TOC1), respectively. All values were normalized to their respective maxima.
Figure 6. Different dynamic behaviors of the clock elements CL and P51 under red-light cycles in comparison with those under white-light cycles. The simulated expression profiles of CL (CCA1/LHY) and P51 (PRR5/TOC1) mRNA on (A) short days (8 h light/16 h dark), (B) intermediate-light-length days (12 h light/12 h dark), and (C) long days (16 h light/8 h dark). R, L, and D indicate red light, white light, and dark, respectively. The solid and dashed lines represent the simulated transcript levels of CL (CCA1/LHY) and P51 (PRR5/TOC1), respectively. All values were normalized to their respective maxima.
Biology 11 01479 g006
Figure 7. Expression of clock genes in loss-of-function mutants under either white-light/dark or red-light/dark cycles. Simulated mRNA levels in various clock mutants (dashed lines) and their respective wild types (solid lines) under red-light cycles (RD, red lines) and white-light cycles (LD, black lines). (A) Simulated PRR5/TOC1 expression in the cca1/LHY double mutant. (B) CCA1/LHY expression in the prr9/prr7 single mutant. (C) Simulated CCA1/LHY expression in the prr5/toc1 single mutant. (D) Simulated CCA1/LHY expression in the elf4/lux single mutant. The grey and white bars represent darkness and light (white light (L) or red light (R)) treatments, respectively.
Figure 7. Expression of clock genes in loss-of-function mutants under either white-light/dark or red-light/dark cycles. Simulated mRNA levels in various clock mutants (dashed lines) and their respective wild types (solid lines) under red-light cycles (RD, red lines) and white-light cycles (LD, black lines). (A) Simulated PRR5/TOC1 expression in the cca1/LHY double mutant. (B) CCA1/LHY expression in the prr9/prr7 single mutant. (C) Simulated CCA1/LHY expression in the prr5/toc1 single mutant. (D) Simulated CCA1/LHY expression in the elf4/lux single mutant. The grey and white bars represent darkness and light (white light (L) or red light (R)) treatments, respectively.
Biology 11 01479 g007
Figure 8. CCA1/LHY and PRR5/TOC1 expression profiles and phase shifts under different red-light/dark photoperiods. (A,B) The time courses of respective CL (CCA1/LHY) and P51 (PRR5/TOC1) transcription levels under red-light photoperiods ranging from 3 to 21 h at intervals of 3 h. The system had been entrained to 12 h white-light/12 h dark cycles for 5 days, transferring into red light. (C,D) The corresponding phase shifts of CL (CCA1/LHY) and P51 (PRR5/TOC1), respectively. The grey and white bars represent darkness and red-light treatment, respectively.
Figure 8. CCA1/LHY and PRR5/TOC1 expression profiles and phase shifts under different red-light/dark photoperiods. (A,B) The time courses of respective CL (CCA1/LHY) and P51 (PRR5/TOC1) transcription levels under red-light photoperiods ranging from 3 to 21 h at intervals of 3 h. The system had been entrained to 12 h white-light/12 h dark cycles for 5 days, transferring into red light. (C,D) The corresponding phase shifts of CL (CCA1/LHY) and P51 (PRR5/TOC1), respectively. The grey and white bars represent darkness and red-light treatment, respectively.
Biology 11 01479 g008
Figure 9. Simulated expression of CCA1 transcript under various red/white and white/red cycles in 12 h light interval with fixed 12 h darkness. The advanced red-light input (A) and advanced white-light input (B) were entrained to different red-light/white-light/dark photoperiods, where red light ranged from 3 to 12 h in increments of 3 h. R:L = 3:9 (red vertical dashed lines in panel (A) and L:R = 3:9 (red vertical dashed lines in panel (B) represent 3 h red light/9 h white light/12 h dark and 3 h white light/9 h red light/12 h dark in a diurnal cycle. R:L = 6:6 (yellow vertical dashed lines in panel (A) and L:R = 6:6 (yellow vertical dashed lines in panel (B) represent 6 h red light/6 h white light/12 h dark and 6 h white light/6 h red light/12 h dark in a diurnal cycle. R:L = 9:3 (green vertical dashed lines in panel (A) and L:R = 9:3 (green vertical dashed lines in panel (B) represent 9 h red light/3 h white light/12 h dark and 9 h white light/3 h red light/12 h dark in a diurnal cycle. R:L = 12:0 (blue vertical dashed lines in panel (A) and L:R = 12:0 (blue vertical dashed lines in panel (B) represent 12 h red light/12 h dark and 12 h white light/12 h dark in a diurnal cycle.
Figure 9. Simulated expression of CCA1 transcript under various red/white and white/red cycles in 12 h light interval with fixed 12 h darkness. The advanced red-light input (A) and advanced white-light input (B) were entrained to different red-light/white-light/dark photoperiods, where red light ranged from 3 to 12 h in increments of 3 h. R:L = 3:9 (red vertical dashed lines in panel (A) and L:R = 3:9 (red vertical dashed lines in panel (B) represent 3 h red light/9 h white light/12 h dark and 3 h white light/9 h red light/12 h dark in a diurnal cycle. R:L = 6:6 (yellow vertical dashed lines in panel (A) and L:R = 6:6 (yellow vertical dashed lines in panel (B) represent 6 h red light/6 h white light/12 h dark and 6 h white light/6 h red light/12 h dark in a diurnal cycle. R:L = 9:3 (green vertical dashed lines in panel (A) and L:R = 9:3 (green vertical dashed lines in panel (B) represent 9 h red light/3 h white light/12 h dark and 9 h white light/3 h red light/12 h dark in a diurnal cycle. R:L = 12:0 (blue vertical dashed lines in panel (A) and L:R = 12:0 (blue vertical dashed lines in panel (B) represent 12 h red light/12 h dark and 12 h white light/12 h dark in a diurnal cycle.
Biology 11 01479 g009
Figure 10. Phase-response curves measured under red-light pulses of various lengths. (A) The model was entrained under white-light/dark cycles (12 h light/12 h dark) for 5 days, then released to a red-light pulse at an indicated time. Each dot represents a pulse at an indicated time. (B) The minimum length of red-light pulse length required for producing an observable phase shift.
Figure 10. Phase-response curves measured under red-light pulses of various lengths. (A) The model was entrained under white-light/dark cycles (12 h light/12 h dark) for 5 days, then released to a red-light pulse at an indicated time. Each dot represents a pulse at an indicated time. (B) The minimum length of red-light pulse length required for producing an observable phase shift.
Biology 11 01479 g010
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, T.; Shui, Y.; Wu, Y.; Hou, X.; You, X. Red Light Resets the Expression Pattern, Phase, and Period of the Circadian Clock in Plants: A Computational Approach. Biology 2022, 11, 1479. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11101479

AMA Style

Huang T, Shui Y, Wu Y, Hou X, You X. Red Light Resets the Expression Pattern, Phase, and Period of the Circadian Clock in Plants: A Computational Approach. Biology. 2022; 11(10):1479. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11101479

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Ting, Yao Shui, Yue Wu, Xilin Hou, and Xiong You. 2022. "Red Light Resets the Expression Pattern, Phase, and Period of the Circadian Clock in Plants: A Computational Approach" Biology 11, no. 10: 1479. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11101479

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop