Next Article in Journal
Quantitative Aspect of Bacillus subtilis σB Regulatory Network—A Computational Simulation
Next Article in Special Issue
The Feeding Behaviour of Gall Midge Larvae and Its Implications for Biocontrol of the Giant Reed: Insights from Stable Isotope Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
KRS-Net: A Classification Approach Based on Deep Learning for Koi with High Similarity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Isotopic Niche Analysis of Long-Finned Pilot Whales (Globicephala melas edwardii) in Aotearoa New Zealand Waters
 
 
Communication
Peer-Review Record

Forensic Application of Stable Isotopes to Distinguish between Wild and Captive Turtles

Biology 2022, 11(12), 1728; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11121728
by John B. Hopkins III 1,*, Cheryl A. Frederick 1, Derek Yorks 2, Erik Pollock 3 and Matthew W. H. Chatfield 4
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Biology 2022, 11(12), 1728; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11121728
Submission received: 1 November 2022 / Revised: 22 November 2022 / Accepted: 25 November 2022 / Published: 29 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Stable Isotope Analysis in Ecology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript titled “Forensic application of stable isotopes to distinguish between 2 wild and captive turtles” describes the application of stable isotopes to reduce wildlife tracking and mitigate biodiversity loss. The well-written manuscript provides novel research that highlights the potential use of stable isotopes to distinguish between wild and captive turtles from differences in diet to assist law enforcement. I think the manuscript is suitable for publication, but I suggest the authors consider my suggestions embedded within the pdf. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

See attached...

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

   The authors conducted very interesting studies using stable isotope analysis to distinguish wild and captive turtles. It is a good application of stable isotope analysis. The major thing I would suggest improving is to add detailed description of methods, including instrument, column, analysis temperature on EA and IRMS (isotope ratio mass spectrometry), and sample preparation for each run.

 

1.      The description for experimental section of stable isotope analysis is not sufficient. Please address the instrument information and method, such as temperature, column, and flow rate.

2.      Please describe how to prepare the samples for sample analysis on the instrument and how much for each run.

3.      Normally, the δ13C value of the samples should be determined with a standard deviation 0.5. Please check if the data analysis is within this range.

4.      It looks like the isotope ratio is greater in captive turtles or some other species than wild ones due to a high-quality animal diet. Does that mean the wild animals’ diet are lack of nutrients?

5.      Besides diet, could be other factors involved in the data difference, such as activity frequency?

6.      Did the authors perform duplicates or triplicates analysis for the precision purpose?

 

Author Response

See attached...

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop