Crop Wild Relatives (CWRs) Threatened and Endemic to Italy: Urgent Actions for Protection and Use
1
CIHEAM, Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Bari, Via Ceglie 9, 70010 Valenzano, Italy
2
Department of Biology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Via Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2022, 11(2), 193; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11020193
Submission received: 16 December 2021
/
Revised: 21 January 2022
/
Accepted: 24 January 2022
/
Published: 26 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Linking Biodiversity and Cultural Diversity: New Approaches for Fostering the Sustainable Use of Natural Resources)
Simple Summary
Crop wild relatives (CWRs) are wild plants with an indirect use derived from their relatively close genetic relationship to a crop and have contributed to crop domestication for millennia. Nowadays, due to human overexploitation of plants and other environmental resources, they are threatened and hence need protection to guarantee plant evolution and food supply for the future of human generations. This concept is especially true for endemic CWRs, which have a greater risk of genetic erosion and/or extinction and need more urgent, specific targeted actions. In this study, the Italian threatened and endemic CWRs, often exclusive of one administrative region, are discussed based on the Annex I Priority crops of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA, FAO).
Abstract
An updated overview of the 29 threatened crop wild relatives (CWRs) endemic to Italy is presented, namely: Arrhenatherum elatius subsp. nebrodense, Barbarea rupicola, Brassica baldensis, Brassica glabrescens, Brassica macrocarpa, Brassica rupestris subsp. hispida, Brassica rupestris subsp. rupestris, Brassica tardarae, Brassicatrichocarpa, Brassica tyrrhena, Brassica villosa subsp. bivonana, Brassica villosa subsp. brevisiliqua, Brassica villosa subsp. drepanensis, Brassica villosa subsp. tineoi, Brassica villosa subsp. villosa, Daucus broteroi, Daucus carota subsp. rupestris, Daucus nebrodensis, Diplotaxis scaposa, Festuca centroapenninica, Lathyrus apenninus, Lathyrus odoratus, Malus crescimannoi, Phalaris arundinacea subsp. rotgesii, Vicia brulloi, Vicia consentina, Vicia giacominiana, Vicia ochroleuca subsp. ochroleuca, Vicia tenuifolia subsp. elegans. Data concerning geographical distribution, ecology (including plant communities and habitats of the Directive 92/43/EEC), genetics (chromosome number, breeding system, and/or the existence of gene pools), threat status at the national and international level (Red Lists), key plant properties, and in situ and ex situ conservation were analyzed and shown. At present, most of the listed endemic CWRs, 23 out of 29, have no gene pool at all, so they are CWRs only according to the taxon group and not according to the gene pool concept. In addition, there is a serious lack of data on the ex situ conservation in gene banks, with 16 species identified as high priority (HP) while 22 taxa have high priority (A) for in situ conservation. With the aim of their protection, conservation, and valorization, specific and urgent actions are recommended.
Keywords:
endemism; gene pool; geographic distribution; threats; valorization
