Next Article in Journal
Performance and Biomechanics in the Flight Period of Ski Jumping: Influence of Ski Attitude
Next Article in Special Issue
Environmental Factors Affecting Feather Taphonomy
Previous Article in Journal
IL-10 Producing Regulatory B Cells Mediated Protection against Murine Malaria Pathogenesis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preservation and Taphonomy of Fossil Insects from the Earliest Eocene of Denmark
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Chemistry and Analysis of Organic Compounds in Dinosaurs

Biology 2022, 11(5), 670; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11050670
by Mariam Tahoun 1, Marianne Engeser 2, Vigneshwaran Namasivayam 1, Paul Martin Sander 3 and Christa E. Müller 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Biology 2022, 11(5), 670; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11050670
Submission received: 20 March 2022 / Revised: 12 April 2022 / Accepted: 22 April 2022 / Published: 27 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Paleontology in the 21st Century)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear authors. I found your review paper appealing and well-written. I have only some minor comments/suggestions (see annotated PDF attached). 

Sincerely, 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors, 

I have read your ordained overview of the state-of-art regarding the organic chemistry of dinosaur fossils. I suggest revising your manuscript by looking at the suggestions included in the attached edited manuscript file. In particular, pay special attention to the Abstract and Introduction. In addition, please do not forget to format the paper according to the MDPI formatting rules, and be sure to include Table 3 in the revised version of your paper. 

The reviewer

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

see attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

This manuscript is so well done in its clear writing, careful scholarship, and thorough documentation, that I have very little to add or critique. There are only two minor edit changes that have to be done. The first one is located in line 306, where a punctuation mark is repeated. The other edit change is located in lines 744 and 745, instead of table 5, it should be table 4.

I recommend publication of the paper after the minor changes are done.

Author Response

Thank you. We have corrected the errors as indicated.

Back to TopTop