Next Article in Journal
Match Running Performance in UEFA Champions League: Is There a Worthwhile Association with Team Achievement?
Next Article in Special Issue
Four New Pale-Spored Species of Xylaria (Xylariaceae, Xylariales) with a Key to Worldwide Species on Fallen Fruits and Seeds
Previous Article in Journal
ITRAQ-Based Proteomic Analysis of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Spikes in Response to Tilletia controversa Kühn and Tilletia foetida Kühn Infection, Causal Organisms of Dwarf Bunt and Common Bunt of Wheat
Previous Article in Special Issue
Apothecial Ancestry, Evolution, and Re-Evolution in Thelebolales (Leotiomycetes, Fungi)
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Phylogenetic Analysis Reveals Four New Species of Otidea from China

Biology 2022, 11(6), 866; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11060866
by Yu-Yan Xu 1,†, Ming-Qi Zhu 2,†, Ning Mao 1, Li Fan 1,* and Xiao-Ye Shen 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Biology 2022, 11(6), 866; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11060866
Submission received: 25 April 2022 / Revised: 2 June 2022 / Accepted: 3 June 2022 / Published: 6 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Studies on Species Diversity and Phylogeny of Ascomycota (Fungi))

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors

The description of four new species of Otidea from China using morphological and molecular data, presented by the authors seems interesting to me. The manuscript overall is good. The content of the paper could be published in Biology. In the manuscript, I pointed out a few minor corrections.

Best regards

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Dear Authors,

Please find herewith my review comments on the manuscript. However, some grammar errors must be corrected. Additionally, please correct the reference style in line with the journal guidelines.

Kind regards

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

I accept the changes that have been made in accordance with my previous suggestions.

Author Response

We appreciate the insightful comments by the anonymous reviewer, which greatly improved the manuscript.

Reviewer 3 Report

Dear authors,

I reviewed this manuscript before and most of my suggestions are considered. However, there are a few issues I would like to be addressed in this version. 

Thank you

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for your comments and constructive suggestions concerning our manuscript. We have made corrections that we hope meet with approval. All the corrections and changes are marked in blue in the revised manuscript.

Thank you.

Back to TopTop