Next Article in Journal
The Mean ApoC1 Serum Level in Postoperative Samples from Neurosurgical Patients Is Lower than in Preoperative Samples and during Chemotherapy
Next Article in Special Issue
Common Ground between Biological Rhythms and Forensics
Previous Article in Journal
Approaches in Gene Coexpression Analysis in Eukaryotes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Efficiency of the Adjusted Binary Classification (ABC) Approach in Osteometric Sex Estimation: A Comparative Study of Different Linear Machine Learning Algorithms and Training Sample Sizes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 11
Issue 7
10.3390/biology11071020
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Post-Mortem Interval of Human Skeletal Remains Estimated with Handheld NIR Spectrometry

by
Verena Maria Schmidt
1,†,
Philipp Zelger
2,†,
Claudia Wöss
1,†,
Christian Wolfgang Huck
3,
Rohit Arora
4,
Etienne Bechtel
5,
Andreas Stahl
5,
Andrea Brunner
6,
Bettina Zelger
6,
Michael Schirmer
7,
Walter Rabl
1 and
Johannes Dominikus Pallua
4,*
1
Institute of Forensic Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Muellerstraße 44, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
2
University Clinic for Hearing, Voice and Speech Disorders, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
3
Institute of Analytical Chemistry and Radiochemistry, University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
4
University Hospital for Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
5
Spectral Engines GmbH, Weißkirchener Straße 2-6, 61449 Steinbach, Germany
6
Institute of Pathology, Neuropathology, and Molecular Pathology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Muellerstrasse 44, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
7
Department of Internal Medicine, Clinic II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biology 2022, 11(7), 1020; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11071020
Submission received: 6 June 2022 / Revised: 30 June 2022 / Accepted: 4 July 2022 / Published: 6 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Forensic Anthropology: New Methodological and Theoretical Perspectives in Forensic Human Skeletal Identification and Methods)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Handheld NIR spectrometry represents a non-destructive method to estimate post-mortem interval with a short sample-preparation time. Based on a deep-learning technique for post-mortem interval approach (ranging from 1 day up to 2000 years) an estimation of post-mortem interval with an accuracy of almost 100% in bones is possible.

Abstract

Estimating the post-mortem interval (PMI) of human skeletal remains is a critical issue of forensic analysis, with important limitations such as sample preparation and practicability. In this work, NIR spectroscopy (NIRONE® Sensor X; Spectral Engines, 61449, Germany) was applied to estimate the PMI of 104 human bone samples between 1 day and 2000 years. Reflectance data were repeatedly collected from eight independent spectrometers between 1950 and 1550 nm with a spectral resolution of 14 nm and a step size of 2 nm, each from the external and internal bone. An Artificial Neural Network was used to analyze the 66,560 distinct diagnostic spectra, and clearly distinguished between forensic and archaeological bone material: the classification accuracies for PMIs of 0–2 weeks, 2 weeks–6 months, 6 months–1 year, 1 year–10 years, and >100 years were 0.90, 0.94, 0.94, 0.93, and 1.00, respectively. PMI of archaeological bones could be determined with an accuracy of 100%, demonstrating the adequate predictive performance of the model. Applying a handheld NIR spectrometer to estimate the PMI of human skeletal remains is rapid and extends the repertoire of forensic analyses as a distinct, novel approach.

1. Introduction

Accurate and rapid identification of human remains often depends on the post-mortem interval (PMI). The PMI must be rapidly determined to identify whether skeletal human remains are of archaeological interest or forensically relevant. Especially recent skeletal remains not older than a few decades are of significant interest to law enforcement [1,2,3]. Depending on the legal system of each country, the time it takes for a case to be relevant varies, for example, with 15 years in Portugal and 50 years in Germany [4,5,6,7]. In skeletal remains, the PMI can be difficult to estimate following the decomposition of soft tissues.
Despite considerable research, there is still no definitive method for estimating the PMI of skeletal remains [8]. The difficulties arise from the complex degradation processes, referring to chemical, physical, and biological processes that occur between bones and the environment where they are located [4]. The type of degradation is not well understood [9], but different parts of the bone have different characteristics and chemical compositions. The organic phase of the bone consists of collagen, lipids, and proteins, which are found within the medullary part. The cortical part of the bone contains organic elements and minerals, including magnesium and hydroxyapatite crystals. Therefore, a portion of the cortex is inorganic and surrounded by the organic phase [10,11]. Degradation is affected by both internal and external factors [4,10]. Internal factors include age, diseases, and diet [10]. External factors include the environment and the characteristics of the soil where the body is buried.
The PMI is typically determined from skeletal remains using morphological analysis, a time-related degradation estimation of other discoveries such as clothing and personal items, or chemical and physical examination [12,13]. Despite its less objective nature, this method involves measuring the external changes in bones [14]. Observing the presence or absence of ligamentous structures and the rate at which fats and other organic matter leaches out, the bones themselves can explain the time since death [15]. The forensic field has proliferated as a branch of analytical chemistry [9]. Several studies focus on bones’ chemical and physical changes after death and the varied factors affecting the diagenetic process [16,17,18]. So far, techniques applied to determine the time elapsed since death of skeletal remains include histological examination [19,20,21], reaction with a mineral acid, reaction with benzidine, nitrogen loss [22], proteomics [23,24,25,26], metabarcoding [27,28], degradation of lipids, remnants of fat-transgression [29], high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry [30], UV-Vis spectroscopic methods [11,31,32,33,34], radioisotope measurements [27,35,36,37], luminol chemiluminescent reaction [3,36,38,39,40], X-ray diffraction [10,41,42], micro-computed tomography [42], and infrared (IR) spectroscopy [4,8,9,33,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. Some of these methods are destructive, others lack objectivity.
Therefore, objective methods such as near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy have the potential for more rapid and accurate estimations of PMI. NIR spectroscopy is optical absorption spectroscopy situated between the visible and mid-infrared region, covering a wavelength range between 780 and 2500 nm. NIR spectra result from fundamental vibrations and overtones of hydrogen bonds such as O-H, C-H, and N-H, enabling quick analysis for a wide range of materials with many different physicochemical parameters and the chemical composition. Many physicochemical parameters can be analyzed quantitatively using NIR spectroscopy, such as particle size, hardness, dissolution rate, compaction force, and water content [53,54,55]. It is a rapid technique for recording a spectrum within only a few seconds. A NIR spectrometer consists of the radiation source, wavelength selector, interferometer, and detector, interfaced with optics, which are available both as benchtop spectrometers for use in laboratories and as autonomous spectrometers used on-site.
NIR spectroscopy’s physical principles make it suitable for miniaturization, and NIR spectrometers have achieved outstanding advances when available in compact technology. Commonly accepted classification of the deployability of the instrumentation distinguishes the transportable, ‘suitcase-type’ and handheld spectrometers. Using state-of-the-art handheld spectrometers for PMI research might provide a valuable extension to conventional ways. In the past decade, the emergence of handheld spectrometers marked a significant turning point in the evolution of the practical applications of NIR spectroscopy. The most recent years have now led to an emerging new class of spectrometers, which are miniaturized, reaching a weight lower than 100 g, with ultra-miniaturized sensors that are compact enough to be built directly into a smartphone device. The miniaturization of sensors has enabled a broader array of NIR spectroscopy applications [56].
Still, several concerns have been raised regarding miniaturized spectrometers, as the new technologies incorporated into handheld devices are much less uniform. The compact technologies show different performances, sometimes with narrower spectral regions or lower resolution. Therefore, data are needed for specific demands. This work focuses on a thorough systematic evaluation of the PMI estimation of human skeletal remains with a handheld spectrometer for NIR spectroscopy. The aim is to assess the potential value of these handheld NIR spectrometers for estimating the PMI.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Ethical Considerations

Recent forensic bone samples (n = 99) were routinely collected for molecular genetic identification purposes during an autopsy at the University Institute of Forensic Medicine, and archaeological bone samples from medieval times were collected from European excavation sites (n = 5). The bone samples with 0–2 weeks PMI (class 1, n = 32), 2 weeks–6 months PMI (class 2, n = 46), 6 months–1 year PMI (class 3, n = 11), 1 year–10 years PMI (class 4, n = 10), and >100 years PMI (class 5, n = 5) were obtained from 16 female and 88 male human remains. The class intervals were based and adjusted according to the time frames used in the §57 of the Austrian criminal code [57]. Classification of PMI was based on investigations by the police and forensic needs before NIR spectrometry. In the case of uncertain conventional estimation of PMIs, the average result was used for classification. Typical anthropological methods (e.g., pelvic bone, skull characteristics [12,58]) and DNA typing were routinely assessed for sex estimation (data not shown). The diaphysis of the femur of forensic and archaeological bone samples was used for analyses. Using a hand saw, one half transversal section was cut from each bone with a thickness of about 7 mm. The cutting planes were cleaned from periost and bone marrow and dried for a few days at room temperature. NIR spectrometry was applied for this study before additional forensic analyses.
The study was conducted according to the ICH-GCP guidelines and the declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was obtained from the local ethics commission (EK: 1357/2021).

2.2. Measurement System

The measurements were performed using a “LabScan” setup of eight devices with NIR detectors (NIRONE® Sensor S2.0; Spectral Engines, 61449 Steinbach, Germany), minimizing variations due to the technical setting. The eight sensors are placed in mechanical holders in this setup and linked via USB hubs to a computer for data storage.
The measurements of the NIR devices are based on a relative calibration process, which is different from the classical benchtop devices, evaluating each sensor’s “response function” along the wavelength axis. Before using the NIR devices, reference material is measured, which acts as an optimal reflector and provides access to the specific response function of each sensor in its wavelength regime.
Overall, each sample was measured 40 times in the range of 1950 to 1550 nm wavelength. After these 40 measurements, each sample was moved to the next detector, as shown in Figure 1. This step was repeated another seven times to assess the statistical fluctuations from the hardware production and the measurement process itself. A second round was then performed for the internal bones. Thus, optimal parameter space coverage was achieved for the deep-learning approach. A dataset of 66,560 measurements was created.

2.3. Data Preparation

Since the individual devices are not calibrated to produce a transferable signal output, the spectral data from each instrument is divided by its reference measurement. The result describes the reflectance of the respective sample. Additionally, the design of the devices does not ensure a reproducible signal height due to potential differences in the sample placement. Therefore, the data needed to be normalized, which was done with a “Standard Normal Variate” (SNV) to evaluate the relative differences along the wavelength axis, making measurements between different devices comparable.
In the last step, the data are filtered by multiple algorithms to ensure high-quality data. Measurement errors, such as the movement of the device while measuring, can produce recognizable artifacts that can be removed automatically with a very high level of confidence.

2.4. Model Creation

An Artificial Neural Network (ANN) was chosen to evaluate the spectral data. Neural networks, especially deep neural networks, can learn complex correlations in data sets and outperform traditional machine learning approaches on various tasks. In this work, the input data consists of an n-dimensional data vector that represents the reflection spectra recorded by the NIR devices. The network consists of several fully connected layers intercepted by dropout layers and regularization layers to prevent overfitting. A controlled data split was performed to avoid cross-correlations between training and test datasets and to avoid biases in the evaluation metrics. Slight label weight adjustments were used to address the asymmetry between output classes and reduce prediction biases correlated to over/undersampling of certain age classes due to sample availability.
In Figure 2, a schematic illustration of the workflow is presented. As an initial step of the given workflow, a recording and preprocessing step was implemented by measuring reference spectra, spectra, and calibration. The next step is to divide the dataset into their respective age classes. The labeled spectra (according to the age classes) are then divided into a training and test set according to the age classes. The training set is used to train and refine the ANN. The test set is used to evaluate the predictive abilities of the ANN.

3. Results

Measured human skeletal remains are summarized in Table 1.

3.1. Optimization of the Measurement Location

Optimizing the measurement location of a sample for NIR experiments is essential to obtaining high-quality results. The model proved to be invariant to the sample spot and robust enough to be applied to all spots and sides of the bone sample. For this purpose, all samples were measured from the external and internal bone. The effects of the measurement location on spectra are illustrated in Figure 3. It can be demonstrated that there is no detrimental effect of the beam focus settings on the spectral shape. In total, 66,560 measurements from the external and internal bones were analyzed. The results show that the spectra taken from the internal and external samples cannot be distinguished by their respective spectra.

3.2. Classification of Post-Mortem Interval

The spectra obtained by NIR spectrometry provide a high dimension of chemical information, demonstrating the sample’s molecular fingerprint and observing different structures or mechanisms linked to the PMI. Figure 4A shows the mean spectra of the five age classes, revealing PMI class-specific profiles from 1950 to 1550 nm. Prominent spectral features are peaks at 1800 and 1600 nm.

3.3. Confusion Matrix of Classification Results

Figure 4B shows the classification result as a confusion matrix. The diagonal elements of such a confusion matrix represent the percentage of correctly classified elements. The bright diagonal elements of the confusion matrix represent the percentage of correctly classified elements, with an accuracy ranging between 100% for the archeological samples (fifth class) and 90% for samples with a PMI between 0 and 2 weeks (first class). In total, 13 elements were classified with a PMI of “some weeks”, which allows an assignment to two classes. Unfortunately, all information was not available in the set of samples analyzed. Samples were included with often undefined PMI descriptions (9 samples with PMI of uncertain number of less than 6 weeks, and 2 samples with uncertain PMI of less than 10 years), different find spots (e.g., forest, flat, buried, water), and thermal alterations (plane crash = 3 and apartment fire = 1).

3.4. Practicability of Handheld NIR Spectrometry

NIR measures the composition of a sample based on the absorption of infrared radiation by vibrational transitions in covalent bonds. This method represents a rapid and non-contact technique without the requirement of additional sample preparation or extractions. The combination of 8 handheld devices can be considered a small desktop device. However, each single device combined with ANN software developed according to this study can be used as a handheld device, which can be used independently from a desk. Using the handheld NIR spectrometer and a mobile software application takes only seconds to estimate the PMI of human skeletal remains (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

There is a need for forensic anthropologists and pathologists to continue investigating precise methods for PMI estimation of skeletal remains [56]. This study aimed to evaluate the suitability of handheld NIR spectrometry to produce distinct and diagnostic spectra distinguishing between forensic and archaeological bone material. Therefore, handheld NIR spectrometry measurements and a deep-learning approach to correlate the PMI with the detected spectral properties were used. Optimization of the measurement location presented no difference between the external and internal bones. The main focus of this study was the training of an ANN that allows for the estimation of the PMI of human bones with an NIR Handheld Spectrometer. An exact assignment to chemical compounds cannot be made because the incoming infrared light excites every state that matches its energy. Such states can be a single atom or molecule energy levels, vibrational or rotational states, but also vibrational or rotational states of complex molecules or lattice vibrations in general. The presented smooth spectrum, without any distinct peak leads, does not allow for the extraction of distinct molecule spectra. The spectra between the first four and the fifth class vary to such an extent in amplitude and shape, as shown in Figure 4A, that the distinction between the first four and the fifth class could even be made without a machine learning approach. This indicates that the limited number of samples did not impose a limitation on the results of this study. Additionally, the gender imbalance between the samples most likely does not lead to a bias in the results. This observation is also demonstrated in [59], that the inter-gender variation is much bigger than the gender difference for most bone-related parameters.
As shown in a confusion matrix (Figure 5), ANN classification results clearly distinguish between forensic and archaeological samples. The machine learning approach allows for the extraction of intrinsic information from spectra without knowing what information one is looking for. The neural network learns the features of the data and extracts the required information to form a decision on the age classes. The learned feature extraction capabilities of the network are encoded in the weights of the network. The neural network forms an abstract representation of the data. Those weights and the derived representations do not present themselves in terms of wavenumbers or similar terms. The result shows a perfect classification of samples for the fifth class (archaeological samples) and the lowest accuracy (90%) for the first class. The age uncertainty of the first-class results in a blurring of the class boundary between the first and second classes, e.g., a bone with a determined age of 14 (±1) days puts the dataset in both the first and the second classes. The same problem can be found analogously in the first temporal elements of the second class. There are some elements classified with “some weeks”, which, within the error, allows an assignment to both classes. This also explains the lowest but still above 90% accuracy in the classification of this first class. A limitation of this study is that samples with a PMI between 10 and 100 years were not available. The classification results might be explained by the differences in the chemical composition of bones. Differences in degradation and environmental effects might also explain the observed differences between the bones with different PMI. The classification results suggest that differences in the chemical composition of bones are responsible for the observed differences in NIR spectra.
The positive results of this study indicate that this method is accurate in differentiating between skeletal remains with a PMI of less than 10 years and historical samples older than 100 years. This differentiation is crucial for forensic medicine, as further operating procedures change dramatically if the skeletal remain is a historical sample without forensic interest. The non-invasive nature of this analysis ensures the sample’s integrity before other analyses. Traditional methodologies are less objective, more expensive and time-consuming, and require specialized operators and instrumentation [60]. Overall, the immediate environment of skeletal remains induces specific degradation processes related to the PMI. NIR spectrometry appears to objectify the results of these degradation processes. Further research into specific types of environments with well-defined PMIs will be necessary to improve NIR spectrometry’s accuracy further. Comparing these data with data from vibrational spectroscopic analyses of bones, taxonomic identification, preservation mechanisms, diagenetic and thermal alteration pathways, and chemical composition [61] will improve our understating of PMI, especially during the first days.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrates the potential of NIR spectroscopy coupled with a deep-learning approach as a means of rapid PMI classification of human bone samples. This approach can distinguish between forensic and archaeological human bone samples. The study highlighted the potential usefulness of the technique as a new, portable technique as more accessible instruments appear on the market. Further optimization of this technique could lead to significant advances in the area. Potential applications include distinguishing between human and animal bone fragments, on complete bones, or even on bones still in situ.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.M.S., P.Z., C.W., M.S., W.R. and J.D.P.; methodology, E.B., A.S. and J.D.P.; software, E.B and A.S.; validation, J.D.P., P.Z., E.B. and A.S.; formal analysis, J.D.P., P.Z., M.S., E.B. and A.S.; investigation, V.M.S., C.W. and J.D.P.; resources, R.A., A.B., B.Z. and J.D.P.; data curation, J.D.P., P.Z., E.B. and A.S; writing—original draft preparation, V.M.S., P.Z., C.W., C.W.H., R.A., E.B., A.S., A.B., B.Z., M.S., W.R. and J.D.P.; writing—review and editing, V.M.S., P.Z., C.W., C.W.H., R.A., E.B., A.S., A.B., B.Z., M.S., W.R. and J.D.P.; supervision, J.D.P.; project administration, J.D.P.; funding acquisition, R.A. and J.D.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Medical Universität of Innsbruck (EK: 1357/2021, date of approval: 29 November 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Richard Scheithauer, head of the Institute of Forensic Medicine (Medical University of Innsbruck), and Lukas Schiffer, Spectral Engines GmbH, for their ongoing support. Additionally, the authors thank Jan Cemper-Kiesslich from the Institute of Forensic Medicine (University of Salzburg) and Harald Stadler head of the Institute of Archeology (University of Innsbruck), for the medieval bone samples. We also owe thanks to Mario Grubhofer and Nina Neumeister from the Institute of Forensic Medicine (Medical University Innsbruck) and Clemens Unterwurzacher from University Hospital for Orthopaedics and Traumatology (Medical University of Innsbruck) for their technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. Etienne Bechtel and Andreas Stahl are employed by Spectral Engines GmbH, Weißkirchener Straße 2-6, 61449 Steinbach.

References

  1. Knight, B.; Lauder, I. Methods of dating skeletal remains. Hum. Biol. 1969, 41, 322–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Knight, B.; Lauder, I. Practical methods of dating skeletal remains: A preliminary study. Med. Sci. Law 1967, 7, 205–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Introna, F., Jr.; Di Vella, G.; Campobasso, C.P. Determination of postmortem interval from old skeletal remains by image analysis of luminol test results. J. Forensic Sci. 1999, 44, 535–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Ortiz-Herrero, L.; Uribe, B.; Armas, L.H.; Alonso, M.L.; Sarmiento, A.; Irurita, J.; Alonso, R.M.; Maguregui, M.I.; Etxeberria, F.; Bartolome, L. Estimation of the post-mortem interval of human skeletal remains using Raman spectroscopy and chemometrics. Forensic Sci. Int. 2021, 329, 111087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sterzik, V.; Holz, F.; Ohlwärther, T.E.N.; Thali, M.; Birngruber, C.G. Estimating the postmortem interval of human skeletal remains by analyzing their fluorescence at 365 and 490 nm. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2018, 132, 933–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ohlwärther, T.E.N.; Holz, F.; Heidorn, F.; Verhoff, M.A.; Birngruber, C.G. Rechtsmedizinische Begutachtung von Knochenfunden am Gießener Institut für Rechtsmedizin. Rechtsmedizin 2022, 32, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Verhoff, M.A.; Heyne, M.; Kreutz, K.; Ramsthaler, F. Liegezeiteingrenzung anhand postmortaler Verletzungen. Rechtsmedizin 2009, 19, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nagy, G.; Lorand, T.; Patonai, Z.; Montsko, G.; Bajnoczky, I.; Marcsik, A.; Mark, L. Analysis of pathological and non-pathological human skeletal remains by FT-IR spectroscopy. Forensic Sci. Int. 2008, 175, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. McLaughlin, G.; Lednev, I.K. Potential application of Raman spectroscopy for determining burial duration of skeletal remains. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2011, 401, 2511–2518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Prieto-Castelló, M.J.; Hernández del Rincón, J.P.; Pérez-Sirvent, C.; Álvarez-Jiménez, P.; Pérez-Cárceles, M.D.; Osuna, E.; Luna, A. Application of biochemical and X-ray diffraction analyses to establish the postmortem interval. Forensic Sci. Int. 2007, 172, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Boaks, A.; Siwek, D.; Mortazavi, F. The temporal degradation of bone collagen: A histochemical approach. Forensic Sci. Int. 2014, 240, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Krogman, W.M.; Iscan, M.Y. The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine; CC Thomas Springfield: Springfield, IL, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  13. Blau, S.; Ubelaker, D.H. Handbook of Forensic Anthropology and Archaeology; Left Coast Press: Walnut Creek, CA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  14. Berg, S. The determination of bone age. In Methods of Forensic Science; Interscience: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1963; Volume 2, pp. 231–252. [Google Scholar]
  15. Behrensmeyer, A.K. Taphonomic and ecologic information from bone weathering. Paleobiology 1978, 4, 150–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Hare, P. Organic geochemistry of bone and its relation to the survival of bone in the natural environment. Foss. Mak. Vertebr. Taphon. Paleoecol. 1988, 69, 208–222. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gordon, C.C.; Buikstra, J.E. Soil pH, bone preservation, and sampling bias at mortuary sites. Am. Antiq. 1981, 46, 566–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Piepenbrink, H. Two examples of biogenous dead bone decomposition and their consequences for taphonomic interpretation. J. Archaeol. Sci. 1986, 13, 417–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dollerup, E. Chemical analyses and microradiographic investigations on bone biopsies from cases of osteoporosis and osteomalacia as compared with normal. Part I. Calcium, phophorus and nitrogen content of normal and osteoporotic human bone. In Bone and Booth; The Macmillan Company: New York, NY, USA, 1964; Volume 399, pp. 399–404. [Google Scholar]
  20. Schultz, M. Microscopic investigation of excavated skeletal remains: A contribution to paleopathology and forensic medicine. In Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1997; pp. 201–222. [Google Scholar]
  21. Yoshino, M.; Kimijima, T.; Miyasaka, S.; Sato, H.; Seta, S. Microscopical study on estimation of time since death in skeletal remains. Forensic Sci. Int. 1991, 49, 143–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chibnall, A.; Rees, M.; Williams, E. The total nitrogen content of egg albumin and other proteins. Biochem. J. 1943, 37, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Camps, F.E.; Cameron, J.M.; Lanham, D.J. Practical Forensic Medicine; Hutchinson: Paris, France, 1971. [Google Scholar]
  24. Cattaneo, C.; Gelsthorpe, K.; Phillips, P.; Sokol, R.J. Reliable identification of human albumin in ancient bone using ELISA and monoclonal antibodies. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1992, 87, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Procopio, N.; Williams, A.; Chamberlain, A.T.; Buckley, M. Forensic proteomics for the evaluation of the post-mortem decay in bones. J. Proteom. 2018, 177, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Prieto-Bonete, G.; Pérez-Cárceles, M.D.; Maurandi-López, A.; Pérez-Martínez, C.; Luna, A. Association between protein profile and postmortem interval in human bone remains. J. Proteom. 2019, 192, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Szelecz, I.; Lösch, S.; Seppey, C.V.W.; Lara, E.; Singer, D.; Sorge, F.; Tschui, J.; Perotti, M.A.; Mitchell, E.A.D. Comparative analysis of bones, mites, soil chemistry, nematodes and soil micro-eukaryotes from a suspected homicide to estimate the post-mortem interval. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Procopio, N.; Ghignone, S.; Williams, A.; Chamberlain, A.; Mello, A.; Buckley, M. Metabarcoding to investigate changes in soil microbial communities within forensic burial contexts. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2019, 39, 73–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Castellano, M.A.; Villanueva, E.C.; von Frenckel, R. Estimating the date of bone remains: A multivariate study. J. Forensic Sci. 1984, 29, 527–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Pérez-Martínez, C.; Pérez-Cárceles, M.D.; Legaz, I.; Prieto-Bonete, G.; Luna, A. Quantification of nitrogenous bases, DNA and Collagen type I for the estimation of the postmortem interval in bone remains. Forensic Sci. Int. 2017, 281, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Taylor, R.E.; Suchey, J.M.; Payen, L.A.; Slota, P.J., Jr. The use of radiocarbon (14C) to identify human skeletal materials of forensic science interest. J. Forensic Sci. 1989, 34, 1196–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kanz, F.; Reiter, C.; Risser, D.U. Citrate Content of Bone for Time Since Death Estimation: Results from Burials with Different Physical Characteristics and Known PMI. J. Forensic Sci. 2014, 59, 613–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Schwarcz, H.P.; Agur, K.; Jantz, L.M. A New Method for Determination of Postmortem Interval: Citrate Content of Bone*. J. Forensic Sci. 2010, 55, 1516–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sterzik, V.; Jung, T.; Jellinghaus, K.; Bohnert, M. Estimating the postmortem interval of human skeletal remains by analyzing their optical behavior. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2016, 130, 1557–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Swift, B. Dating human skeletal remains: Investigating the viability of measuring the equilibrium between 210Po and 210Pb as a means of estimating the post-mortem interval. Forensic Sci. Int. 1998, 98, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cappella, A.; Gibelli, D.; Muccino, E.; Scarpulla, V.; Cerutti, E.; Caruso, V.; Sguazza, E.; Mazzarelli, D.; Cattaneo, C. The comparative performance of PMI estimation in skeletal remains by three methods (C-14, luminol test and OHI): Analysis of 20 cases. Int. J. Leg. Med. 2018, 132, 1215–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Maclaughlin-Black, S.M.; Herd, R.J.; Willson, K.; Myers, M.; West, I.E. Strontium-90 as an indicator of time since death: A pilot investigation. Forensic Sci. Int. 1992, 57, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ramsthaler, F.; Kreutz, K.; Zipp, K.; Verhoff, M.A. Dating skeletal remains with luminol-chemiluminescence. Validity, intra- and interobserver error. Forensic Sci. Int. 2009, 187, 47–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Sarabia, J.; Pérez-Martínez, C.; Hernández del Rincón, J.P.; Luna, A. Study of chemiluminescence measured by luminometry and its application in the estimation of postmortem interval of bone remains. Leg. Med. 2018, 33, 32–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ramsthaler, F.; Ebach, S.C.; Birngruber, C.G.; Verhoff, M.A. Postmortem interval of skeletal remains through the detection of intraosseal hemin traces. A comparison of UV-fluorescence, luminol, Hexagon-OBTI®, and Combur® tests. Forensic Sci. Int. 2011, 209, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Piga, G.; Malgosa, A.; Thompson, T.; Enzo, S. A new calibration of the XRD technique for the study of archaeological burned human remains. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2008, 35, 2171–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Longato, S.; Woss, C.; Hatzer-Grubwieser, P.; Bauer, C.; Parson, W.; Unterberger, S.H.; Kuhn, V.; Pemberger, N.; Pallua, A.K.; Recheis, W.; et al. Post-mortem interval estimation of human skeletal remains by micro-computed tomography, mid-infrared microscopic imaging and energy dispersive X-ray mapping. Anal. Methods 2015, 7, 2917–2927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Surovell, T.A.; Stiner, M.C. Standardizing infra-red measures of bone mineral crystallinity: An experimental approach. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2001, 28, 633–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Thompson, T.; Islam, M.; Piduru, K.; Marcel, A. An investigation into the internal and external variables acting on crystallinity index using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy on unaltered and burned bone. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2011, 299, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gourion-Arsiquaud, S.; Faibish, D.; Myers, E.; Spevak, L.; Compston, J.; Hodsman, A.; Shane, E.; Recker, R.R.; Boskey, E.R.; Boskey, A.L. Use of FTIR spectroscopic imaging to identify parameters associated with fragility fracture. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2009, 24, 1565–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Thompson, T.; Gauthier, M.; Islam, M. The application of a new method of Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy to the analysis of burned bone. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2009, 36, 910–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Pucéat, E.; Reynard, B.; Lécuyer, C. Can crystallinity be used to determine the degree of chemical alteration of biogenic apatites? Chem. Geol. 2004, 205, 83–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Patonai, Z.; Maasz, G.; Avar, P.; Schmidt, J.; Lorand, T.; Bajnoczky, I.; Mark, L. Novel dating method to distinguish between forensic and archeological human skeletal remains by bone mineralization indexes. Int. J. Legal Med. 2013, 127, 529–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Verhoff, M.A.; Kreutz, K.; Jopp, E.; Kettner, M. Forensische Anthropologie im 21. Jahrhundert. Rechtsmedizin 2013, 23, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, H.; Zha, S.; Fang, R.; Wei, X.; Fan, S.; Wang, Z. Estimation of the late postmortem interval using FTIR spectroscopy and chemometrics in human skeletal remains. Forensic Sci. Int. 2017, 281, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Creagh, D.; Cameron, A. Estimating the Post-Mortem Interval of skeletonized remains: The use of Infrared spectroscopy and Raman spectro-microscopy. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2017, 137, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Woess, C.; Unterberger, S.H.; Roider, C.; Ritsch-Marte, M.; Pemberger, N.; Cemper-Kiesslich, J.; Hatzer-Grubwieser, P.; Parson, W.; Pallua, J.D. Assessing various Infrared (IR) microscopic imaging techniques for post-mortem interval evaluation of human skeletal remains. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0174552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Jamrogiewicz, M. Application of the near-infrared spectroscopy in the pharmaceutical technology. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2012, 66, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bec, K.B.; Grabska, J.; Huck, C.W. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Bio-Applications. Molecules 2020, 25, 2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bec, K.B.; Grabska, J.; Huck, C.W. NIR spectroscopy of natural medicines supported by novel instrumentation and methods for data analysis and interpretation. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2021, 193, 113686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Bec, K.B.; Grabska, J.; Huck, C.W. Principles and Applications of Miniaturized Near-Infrared (NIR) Spectrometers. Chemistry 2021, 27, 1514–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Books, D.G.R.L. Strafgesetzbuch von Österreich; Books on Demand: Nordstedt, Germany, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  58. Bass, W.M. Human Osteology: A Laboratory and Field Manual of the Human Skeleton; Missouri Archaeological Society Springfield: Springfield, MO, USA, 1971. [Google Scholar]
  59. Macdonald, H.M.; Nishiyama, K.K.; Kang, J.; Hanley, D.A.; Boyd, S.K. Age-related patterns of trabecular and cortical bone loss differ between sexes and skeletal sites: A population-based HR-pQCT study. J. Bone Miner. Res. Off. J. Am. Soc. Bone Miner. Res. 2011, 26, 50–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Cascant, M.M.; Rubio, S.; Gallello, G.; Pastor, A.; Garrigues, S.; Guardia, M.d.l. Burned bones forensic investigations employing near infrared spectroscopy. Vib. Spectrosc. 2017, 90, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Power, A.C.; Chapman, J.; Chandra, S.; Roberts, J.J.; Cozzolino, D. Illuminating the flesh of bone identification—An application of near infrared spectroscopy. Vib. Spectrosc. 2018, 98, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biology 11 01020 g001 550
Figure 1. LabScan system of eight NIR detectors. Each cycle includes 40 spectra. Each sample was measured with each detector. A total of 66 560 measurements were obtained.
Figure 1. LabScan system of eight NIR detectors. Each cycle includes 40 spectra. Each sample was measured with each detector. A total of 66 560 measurements were obtained.
Biology 11 01020 g001
Biology 11 01020 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the study approach: the procedure was based on extracting hyperspectral NIR information by utilizing a deep-learning-based model applying ANN.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the study approach: the procedure was based on extracting hyperspectral NIR information by utilizing a deep-learning-based model applying ANN.
Biology 11 01020 g002
Biology 11 01020 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of measurement location on spectra quality. NIR spectra from human bone samples measured externally and the internally, displayed in the range from 1950 to 1550 nm.
Figure 3. Effects of measurement location on spectra quality. NIR spectra from human bone samples measured externally and the internally, displayed in the range from 1950 to 1550 nm.
Biology 11 01020 g003
Biology 11 01020 g004 550
Figure 4. (A) Mean spectra are shown for the five different age classes: class 1 with PMI of 0–2 weeks (blue line; n = 32), class 2 with PMI of 2 weeks–6 months (red line; n = 46), class 3 with PMI of 6 months–1 year (orange line; n = 11), class 4 with PMI of 1–10 years (green line; n = 10), and class 5 with PMI of >100 years (black line; n = 5). (B) The confusion matrix of ANN classification shows classification accuracies between 0.90 and 1.
Figure 4. (A) Mean spectra are shown for the five different age classes: class 1 with PMI of 0–2 weeks (blue line; n = 32), class 2 with PMI of 2 weeks–6 months (red line; n = 46), class 3 with PMI of 6 months–1 year (orange line; n = 11), class 4 with PMI of 1–10 years (green line; n = 10), and class 5 with PMI of >100 years (black line; n = 5). (B) The confusion matrix of ANN classification shows classification accuracies between 0.90 and 1.
Biology 11 01020 g004
Biology 11 01020 g005 550
Figure 5. Workflow for NIR-based analysis of spectra. After a single data collection with the extraction of typical spectra, the spectra are analyzed by the ANN software to assign the predicted age class to the input data with high accuracy of almost 100%.
Figure 5. Workflow for NIR-based analysis of spectra. After a single data collection with the extraction of typical spectra, the spectra are analyzed by the ANN software to assign the predicted age class to the input data with high accuracy of almost 100%.
Biology 11 01020 g005
Table
Table 1. Anthropological properties and discovery of the measured human skeletal remains.
Table 1. Anthropological properties and discovery of the measured human skeletal remains.
PMI0–2 Weeks2 Weeks–6 Months6 Months–1 Year1 Year–10 Years>100 Years
flat2534500
flat bathtub10000
plane crash40000
drowned28110
forest03370
forest hut00010
mountain01110
soil00001
Σ324611105
median age615952.949n.a
mean age58.4461.9857.544.28n.a
STD age16.9513.8120.7410.70n.a
not identified age0013n.a
female39211
male2939992
not identified sex00002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Schmidt, V.M.; Zelger, P.; Wöss, C.; Huck, C.W.; Arora, R.; Bechtel, E.; Stahl, A.; Brunner, A.; Zelger, B.; Schirmer, M.; et al. Post-Mortem Interval of Human Skeletal Remains Estimated with Handheld NIR Spectrometry. Biology 2022, 11, 1020. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11071020

AMA Style

Schmidt VM, Zelger P, Wöss C, Huck CW, Arora R, Bechtel E, Stahl A, Brunner A, Zelger B, Schirmer M, et al. Post-Mortem Interval of Human Skeletal Remains Estimated with Handheld NIR Spectrometry. Biology. 2022; 11(7):1020. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11071020

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schmidt, Verena Maria, Philipp Zelger, Claudia Wöss, Christian Wolfgang Huck, Rohit Arora, Etienne Bechtel, Andreas Stahl, Andrea Brunner, Bettina Zelger, Michael Schirmer, and et al. 2022. "Post-Mortem Interval of Human Skeletal Remains Estimated with Handheld NIR Spectrometry" Biology 11, no. 7: 1020. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11071020

APA Style

Schmidt, V. M., Zelger, P., Wöss, C., Huck, C. W., Arora, R., Bechtel, E., Stahl, A., Brunner, A., Zelger, B., Schirmer, M., Rabl, W., & Pallua, J. D. (2022). Post-Mortem Interval of Human Skeletal Remains Estimated with Handheld NIR Spectrometry. Biology, 11(7), 1020. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11071020

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop