Next Article in Journal
Interactions between the Entomopathogenic Fungus Metarhizium anisopliae ICIPE 20 and the Endoparasitoid Dolichogenidea gelechiidivoris, and Implications for Combined Biocontrol of Tuta absoluta
Next Article in Special Issue
Didecyldimethylammonium Chloride- and Polyhexamethylene Guanidine-Resistant Bacteria Isolated from Fecal Sludge and Their Potential Use in Biological Products for the Detoxification of Biocide-Contaminated Wastewater Prior to Conventional Biological Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
p53: From Fundamental Biology to Clinical Applications in Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Isolation, Physiological Characterization, and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Fast-Growing Bacteria from the Sea-Affected Temporary Meltwater Ponds in the Thala Hills Oasis (Enderby Land, East Antarctica)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Distribution and Prevalence of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes of Turfgrass at Golf Courses in China

1
College of Agro-Grassland Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
2
Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2022, 11(9), 1322; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11091322
Submission received: 10 June 2022 / Revised: 25 August 2022 / Accepted: 2 September 2022 / Published: 6 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbial Diversity and Microbial Resistance)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs) are one of the most important pests to cause infectious diseases on turfgrass. Numerous studies have been conducted on PPNs associated with turfgrass worldwide. However, little published research is available on PPNs associated with turfgrass in China. Information on the occurrence, distribution, diversity, and dominant species of PPNs associated with turfgrass in different regions of China is limited, making it challenging to design suitable management practices for control. In this study, we assessed morphological characteristics and utilized molecular methods to identify PPNs from turfgrass soil samples. The purpose of this study was to determine the species, distribution, incidence, and diversity of PPNs associated with turfgrass at golf courses in North, East, and South China (NC, EC, and SC, respectively). The results provide valuable information for the management of PPNs on turfgrass in China.

Abstract

We sampled 127 turfgrass soil samples from 33 golf courses in NC, EC, and SC for plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs). PPNs were extracted from soil samples using the shallow dish method and were identified at the genus or species levels with a combination of morphological and molecular methods. The results revealed 41 species of nematode belonging to 20 genera and 10 families. Nine genera are new records of PPNs associated with turfgrass in China. The PPNs show strong geographical distributions. Of the 20 genera, Helicotylenchus, Paratrichodorus, Hoplolaimus, Meloidogyne, Hemicriconemoides, and Mesocriconema showed higher infestation and frequency, and most of these genera had numbers in soil samples above established damage thresholds. Four golf courses had soil samples with PPNs > 30%, indicating the potential for nematode damage. The biodiversity indices H’, SR, J’, λ, and H2 showed significant differences among different regions and turfgrass species; H’, SR, J’, and H2 were significantly higher in EC than in NC and SC, while λ was lowest in EC. Creeping bentgrass had the highest H’, SR, J’, and H2 and the lowest λ in comparison with seashore paspalum and hybrid bermudagrass. These findings provide baseline information on the occurrence of turfgrass-associated PPNs in China, and have important implications for the effective management of PPNs causing damage on turfgrass.

1. Introduction

Turfgrasses are widely planted in courtyard, urban, and athletic fields, serving important functions in beautifying the environment, preventing soil erosion, purifying the air, and providing safe surfaces for recreational activities [1]. However, the health of turfgrass is frequently threatened by diverse abiotic and biotic factors, especially at golf courses with high maintenance [2]. Plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs) are one of the most important biotic factors causing turfgrass disease. They mainly damage the roots by limiting root development and increasing root susceptibility to other soilborne pathogens, such as fungi, bacteria, and viruses [3]. It is difficult to accurately diagnose problems caused by nematodes because the aboveground symptoms caused by nematodes are often delayed, diverse, and relatively nonspecific [4]. The aboveground turf may display wilting, chlorosis, or patchiness when the belowground roots are attacked by nematodes [5,6]. These symptoms are often misdiagnosed as caused by other pathogenic or opportunistic microorganisms. Numerous studies have been conducted on PPNs associated with turfgrass worldwide [7]. However, limited published research is available for PPNs associated with turfgrass in the southern region of China [8]. Additional studies are needed to gain a better understanding of nematode impacts on turfgrass in China, and can provide valuable information for managing high quality turfgrass.
The species of PPNs on turfgrass are diverse and different across regions and countries. Twenty-nine species of PPNs belonging to 22 genera in 15 families have been found to be associated with bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera), and zoysiagrass (Zoysia japonica) in North Carolina and South Carolina [9]. Helicotylenchus sp., Mesocriconema sp., Hoplolaimus sp., Tylenchorhynchus sp., Belonolaimus longicaudatus, Meloidogyne sp., and Paratrichodorus sp. were the most prevalent and abundant species in the local golf courses [7]. In Belgium, over 50 species/taxa of PPNs belonging to 23 genera in 9 families have been recorded on turfgrass [10]. Helicotylenchus pseudorobustus and Meloidogyne naasi were the most prevalent nematodes. Twenty-eight species/taxa belonging to 16 genera in 12 families of PPNs were found at 13 golf courses in Korea [11], with Helicotylenchus microlobus, Mesocriconema nebraskense, Tylenchorhynchus claytoni, Mesocriconema sp., and Meloidogyne graminicola the most prevalent species in all management zones [11]. Twenty-three nematode genera are known to be associated with turfgrasses in Australia [12]. In China, a recent survey identified Helicotylenchus sp., Mesocriconema sp., Meloidogyne sp., Hemicriconemoides sp., Xiphinema sp., Pratylenchus sp., Hoplolaimus sp., Paratrichodorus sp., Filenchus sp., and Ogma sp. at golf courses in Guangdong [8]. The dominant species were Mesocriconema xenoplax and Meloidogyne graminis. Helicotylenchus dihystera, Mesocriconema xenoplax, Hoplolaimus sp., Paratrichodorus sp., Filenchus sp., and Ogma sp. in this new record of PPNs associated with turfgrasses in China [8].
Although there are diverse species of PPNs associated with turfgrasses [12], and multiple species are generally present at a particular location, this does not necessarily mean that infested turfgrass exhibits signs or symptoms of nematode damage [12]. Most nematodes only cause visible damage when the population is very high and the turfgrass is stressed. PPNs vary in their virulence, and different PPNs have different damage thresholds [13]. Nevertheless, nematodes consistently cause severe damage, and the most damaging PPNs on turfgrasses may vary across different regions and countries [6,13]. The sting nematode, Belonolaimus longicaudatus, is considered the most damaging PPN on bermudagrass in the southeast United States, while the root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) pose a serious threat to turfgrasses in the southern United States [14,15]. The southern sting nematode (Ibipora lolii) is by far the most destructive nematode of turfgrasses in Australia [6]. The damage threshold for B. longicaudatus on turfgrasses is considered to be less than 25 nematodes/100 mL soil, and the damage threshold for I. lolii is likely to be similar to B. longicaudatus [16,17,18]. Until recently, information on the occurrence, distribution, diversity, and dominant species of PPNs associated with turfgrass in different regions of China has been limited, making it challenging to design suitable management practices for control.
In this study, we assessed morphological characteristics and utilized molecular methods to identify PPNs from turfgrass soil samples. The purpose of this study was to determine the species, distribution, incidence, and diversity of PPNs associated with turfgrass from golf courses in North, East, and South China (NC, EC, and SC, respectively). The results provide valuable information for the management of PPNs on turfgrass in China.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

Numerous studies on turfgrass-associated PPNs have focused on turfgrass soil [6,7]. In order to effectively compare the results in the current study with those in previous studies, soil samples were collected from creeping bentgrass, Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.), hybrid bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon × C. transvaalensis), and seashore paspalum (Paspalum vaginatum) at 33 golf courses in NC, EC, and SC during the period from November 2020 to October 2021 (Table 1). The sampling time varied in different regions due to differing periods of time with extensive turfgrass damage in these regions. All sampled golf courses were constructed with sandy soil and were equipped with standard irrigation and drainage systems. Creeping bentgrass and Kentucky bluegrass turf were seeded, while hybrid bermudagrass and seashore paspalum turf were transplanted. There were 5, 14, and 14 golf courses sampled in NC, EC, and SC, respectively (Figure 1), and a total of 12, 52, and 63 soil samples were collected in NC, EC, and SC. Areas with symptoms of turfgrass damage (stunted growth, less dense turf stands, shoot chlorosis, root discolor) were preferred during sampling. Usually, 15–20 soil cores (5 cm in diameter and 15 cm in depth) were collected and merged into one composite soil sample per location (fairway or green). However, if multiple fairways or greens at one golf course showed different symptoms (based on the observation and experience of golf course superintendents), multiple composite samples per golf course were collected. Meanwhile, at least one symptomatic sample and one adjacent apparently healthy sample were collected from 18 golf courses in order to compare the relationship between health status and nematode density. Samples were placed in plastic bags, immediately transported back to the laboratory with ice bags, and stored at 4 °C before analysis to minimize changes in nematode populations [19]. Table 1 summarizes the detailed information on the collected samples. The disease symptoms, turfgrass species, sampling date, and management zone were recorded. In total, one hundred and twenty-seven samples were collected and processed for nematode identification.

2.2. Nematode Extraction and Identification

Samples consisting of multiple cores of turf were gently mixed to break the cores before extraction; 100 cm3 of soil mixture for each sample was used for nematode extraction. Nematodes were extracted from soil samples using the shallow dish method [20,21].
Nematodes were identified to the genus level, and to the species level if possible, based on morphological characteristics; adult females of PPN species were hand-picked and processed to glycerin for identification. The data were recorded as the number of nematodes per 100 cm3 of soil. Nematodes were counted under a stereomicroscope (OLYMPUS DP80) in both larval and adult stages, and morphological identification was carried out under an optical microscope (OLYMPUS DP80). Individual nematodes (mainly mature females) representing each genus or species were picked, killed by heating, and fixed as temporary slide specimens for observation [9]. Nematodes were identified according to the classification system of Goodey (1963) [22] and the books Plant Nematology and Taxonomy of Plant Nematodes [23,24]. The body length, head, lip area, stylet, medium bulb, tail, reproductive system, and digestive system of nematodes were the key points used for morphological identification [25].
Molecular identification was a complementary option when it was difficult to identify nematodes to the genus or species level by morphological characteristics. Meanwhile, in order to confirm the accuracy of morphological identification, all nematodes showing morphological differences were further identified by the molecular method. DNA was extracted by the freeze–thaw method [26]; 28S LSU D2-D3 partial fragment sequence was amplified with the forward primer D2A (5′-ACAAGTACCGTGAGGGAAAGTTG-3′) and the reverse primer D3B (5′-TCGGAAGGAACCAGCTACTA-3′) [27], while 18S SSU partial fragment sequence was amplified with the forward primer 18S965 (5′-GGCGATCAGATACCGCCCTAGTT-3′) and the reverse primer 18S1573R (5′-TACAAAGGGCAGGGACGTAAT-3′) [28]. PCR amplification was conducted in a final volume of 25 μL: 1 μL of template DNA, 2 μL of each primer (10 μM), 12.5 μL of 2 × Taq Master Mix (Tsingke Biotech Co. Ltd., Nanjing, China), and 7.5 μL ddH2O. Amplification was performed with the following parameters: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 4 min followed by 37 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 56 °C for 40 s, extension at 72 °C for 1 min, and a final elongation step at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were purified and sent to Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd. for sequencing. Each sequence was blasted using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (blastn) at NCBI. Nematodes were identified to the genus or species levels with the combinations of morphological and molecular methods described above.

2.3. Data Analysis

The main nematode genera in each region were selected according to the criteria of abundance greater than 1. The dominance of PPNs was expressed as the percentage of the number of PPNs in the total number of nematodes. The prevalence of PPNs was analyzed based on infestation, frequency, abundance, max individuals per 100 cm3 of soil, and percentage of samples above damage threshold. Golf course infestation was defined as the number of courses having a particular nematode species divided by the total number of courses in this region, and was expressed as a percentage. Frequency and abundance were calculated according to Sawadogo and Thio (2009) [29]:
Frequency (%) = P/T × 100
Abundance = lg [(ni/P) + 1]
T = total number of samples
P = number of positive samples
ni = number of nematodes in genus i
At the same time, the damage threshold was defined as the number of nematodes required to cause economic damage on a given turfgrass species based on findings from Nelson (1995) [30] and Stirling (2021) [6]. Several diversity indices were calculated following Yeates and Bird (1994) [31]:
Shannon Weaver   diversity   H = i = 1 s p i ln p i
Richness SR = (s − 1) ln N
Evenness J′ = H′/H′ max
Simpson s   dominance   λ = i = 1 s p i 2
Diversity   H 2 = ln λ
s = number of taxa (species) in the sample
N = total number of nematodes identified in the sample
p i = proportion   of   individuals   of   genus   i   in   the   total   population
Hmax = ln s
The Shannon–Weaver diversity (H′) is commonly used to assess diversity; however, as it may be dominated by the most abundant taxa or the overall number of taxa, both evenness and richness were calculated as well. Simpson’s dominance measure (λ) is used to assess dominance, and its loge transformation offers an alternative measure of diversity (H2) [31].
Differences in the diversity indices were analyzed by Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05) in IBM SPSS Statistics Version 23.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Classification and Distribution of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes

Forty-one species of PPNs in twenty genera of ten families from four orders were identified in the 127 soil samples collected from 33 golf courses in NC, EC, and SC. Nematodes in the order Tylenchida accounted for the largest proportion, including the genii Helicotylenchus, Hoplolaimus, Rotylenchulus, Filenchus, Discotylenchus, Ecphyadophora, Labrys, Criconemoides, Mesocriconema, Hemicycliophora, Hemicriconemoides, Tylenchorhynchus, Hirschmanniella, Ditylenchus, Meloidogyne and Heterodera. The remaining three orders (Triplonchida, Dorylaimida, Aphelenchida) contained four genera (Paratrichodorus, Xiphinema, Paralongidorus, Aphelenchoides). Detailed information on the classification of PPNs is shown in Table 2.
Of the 41 species of PPNs, only one species (Filenchus sp.) was found in all three regions (NC, EC, and SC), appearing at ten golf courses, while thirteen species were found in two regions. A total of seven, thirteen, and seven species of PPNs were found exclusively in NC, EC, or SC, respectively. Ditylenchus dipsaci, Mesocriconema sp., Hemicriconemoides sp., Meloidogyne graminis, Helicotylenchus sp., Helicotylenchus microlobus, Helicotylenchus dihystera, Filenchus sp., Paratrichodorus minor, and Xiphinema ifacolum were found to be associated with at least two turfgrass species, while the rest species of PPNs were exclusively found to be associated with specific turfgrass species (Table 2).

3.2. Prevalence of the Main PPNs

Table 3 shows the specific information on the infestation, frequency, abundance, and damage threshold of the main PPN genera (abundance > 1) at golf courses. There were two, six, and five genera of PPNs with abundance > 1 in NC, EC, and SC, respectively. Helicotylenchus species were found in all sampling regions (the data in EC are not shown in the table because the abundance was less than 1), with high infestation, frequency, and abundance in NC and SC; 33.33% of the samples from SC had Helicotylenchus above the damage threshold. In EC, Paratrichodorus had the highest infestation (64.29%) and the highest frequency (59.62%); the proportion of soil samples with Paratrichodorus above the damage threshold accounted for 9.68%. Xiphinema had the second highest infestation rate in EC, with an infestation, frequency, and abundance of 42.86%, 23.08%, and 1.86, respectively, and the number of samples above the damage threshold accounted for 8.33%. Meloidogyne had a low infestation rate (21.43% in EC and 16.67% in SC), with high abundance (1.61 in EC and 1.37 in SC). The proportion of samples above the damage threshold was 28.57% in EC and 12.5% in SC.

3.3. PPNs and Soil Health

This research revealed that the density of PPNs in turfgrass soil is directly reflected in soil health; the dominance of PPNs in healthy soil was generally lower than 30% [32,33]. In this study, the density and dominance of PPNs in healthy and problematic samples were compared (Table 4) in order to better identify the potential issues caused by PPNs on turfgrass. Of the eighteen golf courses investigated, four revealed dominance of PPNs higher than 30%, while the density and dominance of problematic samples in three golf courses (Nanjing Sun Island, Shenzhen Sand River, and Shanghai Tomson) were higher than those of healthy samples. In samples from Shanqin Bay golf course, the dominance of PPNs in healthy and problematic samples was 61.70% and 50.12%, respectively, significantly higher than 30%. Meanwhile, the density of PPNs in healthy samples was significantly higher than that in problematic samples from this golf course. Of the other fourteen golf courses with dominance of PPNs lower than 30%, the density and dominance of PPNs in healthy samples in Nanjing Zhongshan (H: 24.69%, P: 15.31%), Shanghai Links (H: 10.83%, P: 3.86%), Anhui Huangshan Pine (H: 9.33%, P: 4.18%), and Shenzhou Peninsula (H: 14.86%, P: 3.50%) golf courses were higher than those in problematic samples, while the other golf courses had similar dominance of PPNs in both healthy and problematic samples; the density of PPNs was consistently higher in problematic samples at these golf courses.

3.4. Nematode Diversity

The indices H’, SR, J’, λ, and H2, which reflect the biodiversity of PPNs, showed significant differences at golf courses in NC, EC, and SC (Table 5). H’, SR, J’, and H2 were significantly higher in EC than in NC and SC, while λ was lowest in EC. H’, J’, and H2 were lowest and λ was highest in SC. The impact of turfgrass species on the biodiversity indices of PPNs are presented in Table 6. H’, SR, J’, λ, and H2 showed significant differences among the three species of turfgrass. H’, SR, J’, and H2 were significantly higher in creeping bentgrass than in seashore paspalum and hybrid bermudagrass, while λ was lowest in creeping bentgrass. H’, J’, and H2 were lowest and λ was highest in seashore paspalum.

4. Discussion

There is a lack of systematic research on PPNs on turfgrass at golf courses in China, as previous studies have often been limited to certain regions [8,34,35]. This study expanded the scope of investigations to a country-wide scale. In total, 41 species of PPNs from 20 genera were identified in 127 soil samples collected from 33 golf courses in NC, EC, and SC. It has previously been reported that a total of 15 nematode genera are associated with turfgrass in Guangdong, China [8], and 73% of these were documented in the current study as well. Ditylenchus, Hemicycliophora, Heterodera, Rotylenchulus, Hirschmanniella, Discotylenchus, Ecphyadophora, Labrys, and Paralongidorus were the newly recorded nematode genera on turfgrass in China. These results reveal a high diversity of PPNs associated with turfgrasses at golf courses in China.
Of the 41 species identified in this study, only one species (Filenchus spp.) was detected in all three regions (NC, EC, and SC), with most species exhibiting strong regional distributions. For example, Tylenchorhynchus annulatus, Criconemoides annulatus, and Heterodera avenae were only found in NC, Ditylenchus destructor and Meloidogyne incognita were only found in EC, and Helicotylenchus indicus and Aphelenchoides pseudogoodeyi were only found in SC. Similar regional distributions of turfgrass associated-PPNs have been observed in other countries [10,29,34,35,36,37,38,39].
Previous studies have shown that the nematode genera Belonolaimus, Mesocriconema, Helicotylenchus, Hemicycliophora, Hoplolaimus, Paratrichodorus, Pratylenchus, Meloidogyne, Trichodorus, Tylenchorhynchus, and Xiphinema are associated with turfgrasses [40,41,42]. Similar results were revealed in this study as well. Table 3 shows the nematode genera with abundance greater than 1, which can potentially cause damage to turfgrass. The turfgrass-associated genera Helicotylenchus, Paratrichodorus, Hoplolaimus, Meloidogyne, Hemicriconemoides, and Mesocriconema showed high infestation and frequency in this study, and most of these genera had numbers in soil samples above the damage threshold. For example, Helicotylenchus was widely distributed with a high infestation rate in NC and SC, and the number of Helicotylenchus in a soil sample from Shanqin Bay golf course significantly exceeded the damage threshold [13]. Meloidogyne has been reported to cause great economic losses and severely damage the root system of turfgrass [43,44], and was found to exceed the damage threshold in soil samples from Shenzhen Sand River golf course [13]. In this study, we found that more genera appeared to cause damage on turfgrass in EC and SC compared to NC, and the number of nematode genera (abundance > 1) did not exceed the damage threshold in NC. This is reasonable, as the EC and SC regions have increased rainfall, soil moisture, and humidity profiles, and several nematode genera showed a clear trend of increasing prevalence in humid regions compared to dry regions [17,29]. These results suggest that close attention should be paid to those nematode genera with high abundance in order to prevent severe damage to turfgrass in China, especially in EC and SC.
Beginning in the late 1980s, nematodes have been used as an indicator of overall soil health [45]. In this study, we compared the density and dominance of PPNs in healthy and problematic soil samples in order to better understand potential problems caused by nematodes. However, for most of the investigated golf courses the soil samples had PPNs with dominance less than 30%, which indicated that the problematic soils and turfgrasses from these golf courses were unlikely to be caused by PPNs. Only four golf courses had soil samples in which dominance of PPNs was more than 30%, and three of them showed density and dominance of PPNs that were higher in problematic soil than in healthy soil. Moreover, four golf courses (Nanjing Sun Island, Shenzhen Sand River, Shanghai Tomson, and Wanning Shanqin Bay) were documented as having nematode problems according to communications with their respective golf course superintendents, which indicates that the density and dominance indices are valuable for nematode problem diagnosis. At present, definitive diagnosis of problems caused by nematodes is challenging because the symptoms of nematode damage are relatively nonspecific [5,6]. Monitoring the density and dominance of PPNs in healthy and problematic turfgrass soil can help to better ascertain the impact of nematodes on total plant health.
H’, SR, J’, λ, and H2 are important indices for describing biodiversity and analyzing the impact of different factors on the species distribution of PPNs [7,46]. In our study, all the indices were significantly different among different regions and turfgrass species, similar to the results observed in previous studies [7]. This reveals the effect of different habitats (including turfgrass species and geographical regions) on the diversity of nematode species in turfgrass ecosystems. In this study, soil samples from golf courses in SC and seashore paspalum had the lowest H’, J’, and H2 values, indicating a lower diversity of species and a potentially higher risk of nematode issues. Seashore paspalum, a warm season turfgrass, is widely planted in SC and is reported to be more susceptible to sources of biotic stress (e.g., pathogenic fungi) than other turfgrass species, which is consistent with the findings in this study [47]. Further investigation is needed in order to monitor the progress of nematode impacts on seashore paspalum.
During our survey of PPNs on turfgrass, we found that the soil samples from Jinji Lake and Suzhou Taihu golf course contained higher proportions of predatory nematodes, while PPNs were often found in lower proportions. This finding suggests that the presence of predatory nematodes may influence the propagation of PPNs. Predatory nematodes have been suggested as potential biocontrol materials for nematode diseases in a few previous studies [48,49]. However, very little confirmed evidence has shown that they play a vital role in mitigating the damage caused by PPNs. While the roles of predatory nematodes (including as bacterivores, fungivores, and omnivores) need to be further investigated, they may help better control problems caused by PPNs and improve overall soil health [50].

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, a total of 41 species of PPNs belonging to 20 genera and 10 families were found to be associated with different species of turfgrasses at golf courses in NC, EC, and SC; of these, nine genera are new records of PPNs associated with turfgrass in China. This study revealed the distribution and prevalence of PPNs on turfgrass at golf courses in China, highlighting the most prevalent genera associated with lowered soil health and turf damage. The results suggest that comparing the density and dominance indices in healthy and problematic soil samples may help to accurately assess the deleterious impacts caused by PPNs. The biodiversity indices of PPNs were significantly different among different regions and turfgrass species, indicating differential risk of nematode issues in these regions or on different species of turfgrass. This study can provide baseline information on the occurrence of turfgrass-associated PPNs in China, and the results have important implications for the management of PPNs on turfgrass in China. However, certain the indices, especially density and dominance, need to be interpreted carefully, as they are based on single samples and lack reproducibility. Further research is needed, and sampling throughout the season should be considered, along with increased sampling at single golf courses, allowing much stronger conclusions to be drawn.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology and resources, J.H. and Y.D.; data curation and formal analysis, Y.D. and P.J.; writing and original draft preparation, Y.D. and H.Z.; writing, review, and editing, J.H. and K.L.; supervision and funding acquisition, J.H. and Z.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Syngenta Crop Protection.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Qing Xue in the Plant Nematology Laboratory of Nanjing Agricultural University for technical support; we thank Qinghua Xu and Haozhi Xu from Syngenta Crop Protection for work deployment; we thank Syngenta Crop Protection for financial support of this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Uddin, M.K.; Juraimi, A.S. Salinity Tolerance Turfgrass: History and Prospects. Sci. World J. 2013, 2013, 409413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Stowell, L.J.; Gelernter, W.D. Diagnosis of turfgrass diseases. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2001, 39, 135–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Smiley, R.W.; Dernoeden, P.H.; Clarke, B.B. Compendium of Turfgrass Diseases, 2nd ed.; American Phytopathological Society: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  4. Stackhouse, T.; Martinez-Espinoza, A.D.; Ali, M.E. Turfgrass disease diagnosis: Past, present, and future. Plants 2020, 9, 1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jordan, K.; Mitkowski, N. Population dynamics of plant-parasitic nematodes in golf course greens turf in southern New England. Plant Dis. 2006, 90, 501–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Stirling, G.; Stirling, A.; Eden, L. Plant-parasitic nematodes on turfgrass in Queensland, Australia, and biosecurity issues associated with the interstate transfer and eradication of southern sting nematode (Ibipora lolii). Australas. Plant Pathol. 2021, 50, 695–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zeng, Y.S.; Ye, W.; Martin, S.B.; Tredway, L. Diversity and occurrence of plant-parasitic nematodes associated with golf course turfgrasses in North and South Carolina, USA. Nematology 2012, 44, 337–347. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, X.G. Identification of Parasitic Nematodes on Golf Course Turfgrasses in Guangdong. Ph.D. Thesis, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Guangzhou, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zeng, Y.S.; Ye, W.; Tredway, L.; Martin, S.; Martin, M. Taxonomy and morphology of plant-parasitic nematodes associated with turfgrasses in North and South Carolina, USA. Zootaxa 2012, 3452, 1–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vandenbossche, B.; Viaene, N.; Sutter, N.; Maes, M.; Karssen, G.; Bert, W. Diversity and incidence of plant-parasitic nematodes in Belgian turfgrass. Nematology 2011, 13, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mwamula, A.O.; Lee, D.W. Occurrence of plant-parasitic nematodes of turfgrass in Korea. Plant Pathol. J. 2021, 37, 446–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mcleod, R.W.; Reay, F.; Smyth, J. Plant Nematodes of Australia Listed by Plant and by Genes; NSW Agriculture: Orange, Australia, 1995.
  13. LaMondia, J.; Wick, R.L.; Mitkowski, N. Plant parasitic nematodes of New England: Connecticut, Massachusetts and Rhode Island. Sustainability in plant and crop protection. In Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Sustainable Agriculture of North America; Subbotin, S., Chitambar, J., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  14. Crow, W.T.; Habteweld, A.W.; Bean, T. Mist chamber extraction for improved diagnosis of Meloidogyne spp. from golf course bermudagrass. J. Nematol. 2020, 52, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lucas, L.T. Population dynamics of Belonolaimus longicaudatus and Criconemella ornata and growth response of bermudagrass and overseeded grasses on golf greens following treatment with nematicides. J. Nematol. 1982, 14, 358–363. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Buckley, R.J.; Koppenhöfer, A.M.; Crow, W.T. Integrated approach to nematode management in turfgrass. Plant Pest Advis. 2008, 14, 4–7. [Google Scholar]
  17. Crow, W.T. Nematode management for golf courses in Florida. EDIS 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ruscoe, P.E.; Stirling, G.R. Southern sting nematode (Ibipora lolii), a serious pest of turf grasses in Australia. A review of what can be learnt from research on Belonolaimus longicaudatus, a closely related pest of turfgrass and many crops in the United States. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2020, 49, 493–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Barker, K.R.; Nusbaum, C.J.; Nelson, L.A. Effects of storage temperature and extraction procedure on recovery of plant-parasitic nematodes from field soils. J. Nematol. 1969, 1, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Whitehead, A.G.; Hemming, J. A comparison of some quantitative methods of extracting small vermiform nematodes from soil. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1965, 55, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mao, X.F.; Li, H.X.; Chen, X.Y. Extraction efficiency of soil nematodes by different methods. Chin. J. Ecol. 2004, 23, 149–151. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chitwood, B.G. Soil and freshwater nematodes. Science 1963, 144, 721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Perry, R.N.; Moens, M. Plant Nematology; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  24. Xie, H. Taxonomy of Plant Nematodes, 2nd ed.; Higher Education Press: Beijing, China, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  25. Antoinette, S.; Mariette, M.; Denberg, E. Nematode Morphology and Classification; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  26. Rong, W.T.; Wang, J.C.; Liu, P.; Lin, Y.; Guo, J.Z.; Huang, G.M.; Sun, J.H. Research on DNA extraction methods from a single nematode. Acta Agric. Boreali-Sin. 2014, 29, 127–132. [Google Scholar]
  27. Nunn, G.B. Nematode molecular evolution: An Investigation of Evolutionary Patterns Among Nematodes Based upon DNA Sequences. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mullin, P.; Harris, T.; Powers, T. Phylogenetic relationships of Nygolaimina and Dorylaimina (Nematoda: Dorylaimida) inferred from small subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. J. Nematol. 2005, 7, 59–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sawadogo, A.; Thio, B.; Kiemde, S.; Drabo, I.; Dabire, C.L.; Ouedraogo, J.T.; Mullens, T.R.; Ehlers, J.D.; Roberts, P.A. Distribution and prevalence of parasitic nematodes of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in Burkina Faso. J. Nematol. 2009, 41, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Nelson, E. Nematode disorders of turfgrasses: How important are they? Turf Grass Trends 1995, 4, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yeates, G.W.; Bird, A.F. Some observations on the influence of agricultural practices on the nematode faunae of some South Australian soils. Fundam. Appl. Nematol. 1994, 17, 133–145. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ekschmitt, K.; Bakonyi, G.; Bongers, M.; Bongers, T.; Boström, S.; Dogan, H.; Harrison, A.; Nagy, P.; O’Donnell, A.G.; Papatheodorou, E.M.; et al. Nematode community structure as indicator of soil functioning in European grassland soils. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2001, 37, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gautier, M. Nematodes in fruit tree nurseries. Arboric. Fruit. 1975, 252, 17–25. [Google Scholar]
  34. Fang, Y.S.; Zhuo, K.; Gao, J.S.; Wang, X.Y. Preliminary survey and identification of grass carpey nematode in Guangzhou region. Pratacultural Sci. 2003, 20, 37–42. [Google Scholar]
  35. Wei, Y.J. Investigation and identification of species of parasitic nematodes in grass in Huaian region. J. Anhui Agric. Sci. 2006, 34, 3413. [Google Scholar]
  36. Bond, J.P.; Mcgawley, E.C.; Hoy, J.W. Distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes on sugarcane in Louisiana and efficacy of nematicides. J. Nematol. 2000, 32, 493–501. [Google Scholar]
  37. Simard, L.; Bélair, G.; Powers, T.O.; Tremblay, N.; Dionne, J. Incidence and population density of plant-parasitic nematodes on golf courses in Ontario and Québec, Canada. J. Nematol. 2008, 40, 241–251. [Google Scholar]
  38. Liang, L.L.; Liu, Q.Z.; Xie, N.; Li, X.Y.; Yang, D.; Bian, Y.; Xie, D.Y. Nematode trophic group structure in wilted turf soil and its regulation factors. Acta Agric. Zhejiangensis 2011, 23, 948–954. [Google Scholar]
  39. Liu, Q.Z.; Liang, L.L.; Yang, D.; Bian, Y.; Zhou, H.Y.; Xie, D.Y. Analysis of community characteristics of nematodes in turf soil of Yongfeng virescence region in Beijing. Acta Pratacultural Sci. 2009, 18, 136–141. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lucas, L.T.; Blake, C.T.; Barker, K.R. Nematodes associated with bentgrass and bermudagrass golf greens in North Carolina. Plant Dis. Report. 1974, 58, 822–824. [Google Scholar]
  41. Sikora, E.J.; Guertal, E.A.; Bowen, K.L. Plant-parasitic nematodes associated with hybrid bermudagrass and creeping bentgrass putting greens in Alabama. Nematropica 2001, 31, 301–306. [Google Scholar]
  42. Walker, N.R.; Goad, C.L.; Zhang, H.; Martin, D.L. Factors associated with populations of plant-parasitic nematodes in bentgrass putting greens in Oklahoma. Plant Dis. 2002, 86, 764–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Janati, S.; Houari, A.; Wifaya, A.; Essarioui, A.; Mimouni, A.; Hormatallah, A.; Sbaghi, M.; Dababat, A.; Mokrini, F. Occurrence of the root-knot nematode species in vegetable crops in Souss region of Morocco. Plant Pathol. J. 2018, 34, 308–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ye, W.; Zeng, Y.; Kerns, J.P. Molecular characterisation and diagnosis of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) from turfgrasses in North Carolina, USA. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Neher, D.A. Role of nematodes in soil health and their use as indicators. J. Nematol. 2001, 33, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Popovici, I.; Ciobanu, M. Diversity and distribution of nematode communities in grasslands from Romania in relation to vegetation and soil characteristics. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2000, 14, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, W.; Nan, Z.B.; Tian, P.; Hu, M.J.; Gao, Z.Y.; Li, M.; Liu, G.D. Microdochium paspali, a new species causing seashore paspalum disease in southern China. Mycologia 2015, 107, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Allan-Perkins, E.; Manter, D.K.; Wick, R.L.; Ebdon, S.; Jung, G. Nematode communities on putting greens, fairways, and roughs of organic and conventional cool-season golf courses. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 121, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kostenko, O.; Duyts, H.; Grootemaat, S.; De Deyn, G.B.; Bezemer, T.M. Plant diversity and identity effects on predatory nematodes and their prey. Ecol. Evol. 2015, 5, 836–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Neher, D.A. Ecology of plant and free-living nematodes in natural and agricultural soil. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2010, 48, 371–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The distributions of the thirty-three sampled golf courses in North, East, and South China.
Figure 1. The distributions of the thirty-three sampled golf courses in North, East, and South China.
Biology 11 01322 g001
Table 1. Detailed information on turfgrass soil samples collected from different regions of China.
Table 1. Detailed information on turfgrass soil samples collected from different regions of China.
RegionSampling DateGolf CourseTurfgrass SpeciesNo. of Samples
NCJuly 2021Beijing QinghewanCreeping bentgrass2
July 2021Beijing LaffitteCreeping bentgrass2
August 2021Beijing YuyangCreeping bentgrass4
October 2021Beijing CBDCreeping bentgrass2
October 2021Shaanxi Yulin DesertKentucky bluegrass2
ECMay 2021Nantong Xiao Yang KouCreeping bentgrass, Seashore paspalum2
July 2021Nanjing Sun IslandCreeping bentgrass6
August 2021Nanjing ZhongshanCreeping bentgrass2
July 2021Suzhou TaihuCreeping bentgrass8
July 2021Taicang East SeaCreeping bentgrass2
July 2021Suzhou Jinji LakeCreeping bentgrass6
September 2021Changzhou KingswanCreeping bentgrass5
September 2021Suzhou ShuangshanCreeping bentgrass4
May 2021Huzhou HotspringCreeping bentgrass3
July 2021Haining Lake HillCreeping bentgrass2
July 2021Shanghai Sino-BayCreeping bentgrass4
August 2021Shanghai LinksCreeping bentgrass2
August 2021Shanghai TomsonCreeping bentgrass2
September 2021Huangshan PineHybrid bermudagrass4
SCNovember 2020Hainan MeilanHybrid bermudagrass4
November 2020Hainan MeilangwanSeashore paspalum5
November 2020Hainan West CoastSeashore paspalum6
November 2020Hainan MeishiHybrid bermudagrass4
November 2020Hainan Mission HillsHybrid bermudagrass4
November 2020Haikou Three MilesHybrid bermudagrass7
November 2020Boao Asia BBSHybrid bermudagrass, Seashore paspalum4
November 2020Qionghai White Stone Hot SpringSeashore paspalum2
July 2021Shenzhou PeninsulaSeashore paspalum4
November 2020Sanya Blue BaySeashore paspalum6
July 2021Wanning Shanqin BaySeashore paspalum4
September 2021Sanya LuhuitouHybrid bermudagrass3
September 2021Guangdong ChaoshanCreeping bentgrass2
October 2021Shenzhen Sand RiverHybrid bermudagrass, Seashore paspalum8
Table 2. The classification and distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes in North, South, and East China.
Table 2. The classification and distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes in North, South, and East China.
OrderNematode ClassificationRegionGolf CourseTurfgrass SpeciesNo. of Courses
Order Tylenchida, family Anguinidae -
1Ditylenchus spp.ECNanjing ZhongshanCreeping bentgrass1
2Ditylenchus destructorECSuzhou TaihuCreeping bentgrass1
3Ditylenchus dipsaciECHuzhou Hotspring, Shanghai Sino-Bay, Shanghai LinksCreeping bentgrass3
SCWanning Shanqin Bay, Hainan Mission HillsHybrid bermudagrass, Seashore Paspalum2
4Ditylenchus cf. microdensNCShaanxi Yulin DesertKentucky bluegrass1
Order Tylenchida, family Belonolaimidae -
5Tylenchorhynchus annulatusNCBeijing LaffitteCreeping bentgrass1
Order Tylenchida, family Criconematidae -
6Criconemoides annulatusNCBeijing LaffitteCreeping bentgrass1
7Mesocriconema spp.NCShaanxi Yulin DesertKentucky bluegrass1
SCHaikou Three Miles, Guangdong Chaoshan, Shenzhen Sand RiverCreeping bentgrass, Seashore Paspalum, Hybrid bermudagrass3
8Mesocriconema curvatumNCBeijing Laffitte, Beijing YuyangCreeping bentgrass2
9HemicycliophoraconidaNCShaanxi Yulin DesertKentucky bluegrass1
10Hemicriconemoides spp.ECNantong Xiao Yang KouCreeping bentgrass1
SCHainan West Coast, Wanning Shanqin Bay, Shenzhou Peninsula, Sanya Luhuitou, Haikou Meilangwan, Hainan Mission HillsSeashore Paspalum, Hybrid bermudagrass6
Order Tylenchida, family Heteroderidae -
11Heterodera avenaeNCBeijing CBDCreeping bentgrass1
12Meloidogyne graminisECChangzhou Kingswan, Nanjing ZhongshanCreeping bentgrass2
SCShenzhen Sand RiverHybrid bermudagrass, Seashore Paspalum1
13Meloidogyne incognitaECSuzhou Jinji LakeCreeping bentgrass1
Order Tylenchida, family Hoplolaimidae -
14Helicotylenchus spp.ECSuzhou Jinji Lake, Suzhou Shuangshan, Shanghai Sino-Bay, Huangshan PineCreeping bentgrass, Hybrid bermudagrass4
SCHaikou Meishi, Haikou Meilangwan, Boao Asia BBS, Qionghai White Stone Hot SpringHybrid bermudagrass, Seashore Paspalum4
15Helicotylenchus microlobusNCBeijing Qinghewan, Beijing LaffitteCreeping bentgrass2
SCHainan Mission Hills, Haikou Three Miles, Haikou Meilan, Wanning Shanqin BayHybrid bermudagrass, Seashore Paspalum4
16Helicotylenchus digitiformisECNantong Xiao Yang KouCreeping bentgrass1
17Helicotylenchus dihysteraNCBeijing YuyangCreeping bentgrass1
SCShenzhou Peninsula, Hainan West Coast, Guangdong ChaoshanHybrid bermudagrass, Seashore Paspalum3
18Helicotylenchus paraplatyurusSCHainan Mission HillsHybrid bermudagrass1
19Helicotylenchus pseudorobustusNCBeijing CBDCreeping bentgrass1
SCHainan West CoastSeashore Paspalum1
20Helicotylenchus rotundicaudaECNantong Xiao Yang KouCreeping bentgrass1
21Helicotylenchus indicusSCShenzhen Sand RiverHybrid bermudagrass, Seashore Paspalum1
22Hoplolaimus columbusECSuzhou Jinji Lake, Nanjing Zhongshan, Shanghai Sino-Bay, Links, Shanghai TomsonCreeping bentgrass5
SCHainan West Coast, Guangdong ChaoshanSeashore Paspalum, Creeping bentgrass2
23Rotylenchulus spp.SCHaikou Three MilesHybrid bermudagrass1
Order Tylenchida, family Pratylenchidae -
24HirschmanniellaoryzaeECHuzhou HotspringCreeping bentgrass1
Order Tylenchida, family Tylenchidae -
25Filenchus spp.NCBeijing Qinghewan, Beijing YuyangCreeping bentgrass2
ECSuzhou Jinji Lake, Suzhou ShuangshanCreeping bentgrass2
SCHainan Meilan, Haikou Meilangwan, Haikou Meishi, Hainan West Coast, Haikou Three Miles, Qionghai White Stone Hot SpringHybrid bermudagrass, Seashore Paspalum6
26Filenchus discrepansECSuzhou Taihu, Taicang East SeaCreeping bentgrass2
27Filenchus misellusECHuangshan PineHybrid bermudagrass1
28Discotylenchus spp.NCBeijing CBDCreeping bentgrass1
ECShanghai TomsonCreeping bentgrass1
29Ecphyadophora quadralataECSuzhou TaihuCreeping bentgrass1
30LabryskhuzestanensisSCShenzhou PeninsulaSeashore Paspalum1
31Labrys chinensisSCWanning Shanqin BaySeashore Paspalum1
Order Triplonchida, family Trichodoridae
32Paratrichodorus porosusNCBeijing QinghewanCreeping bentgrass1
33Paratrichodorus minorECSuzhou Taihu, Suzhou Jinji Lake, Suzhou Shuangshan, Changzhou Kingswan, Nanjing Sun Island, Nantong Xiao Yang Kou, Shanghai Sino-Bay, Huangshan PineCreeping bentgrass, Seashore Paspalum, Hybrid bermudagrass8
Order Dorylaimida, family Longidoridae -
34Xiphinema spp.ECHuangshan PineHybrid bermudagrass1
SCBoao Asia BBSHybrid bermudagrass, Seashore Paspalum1
35Xiphinema nuragicumECSuzhou Jinji Lake, Nanjing Sun Island, Nanjing Zhongshan, Shanghai TomsonCreeping bentgrass4
36Xiphinema hunanienseECNanjing Sun IslandCreeping bentgrass1
37Xiphinema insigneECShanghai Sino-BayCreeping bentgrass1
38Xiphinema ifacolumECShanghai Sino-Bay, Nanjing ZhongshanCreeping bentgrass2
SCShenzhen Sand RiverHybrid bermudagrass, Seashore Paspalum1
39Paralongidorus koreanensisSCShenzhen Sand RiverHybrid bermudagrass1
Order Aphelenchida, family Aphelenchoididae -
40Aphelenchoides pseudogoodeyiSCHainan Mission Hills, Boao Asia BBSHybrid bermudagrass, Seashore Paspalum2
41Aphelenchoides bicaudatusECShanghai Sino-Bay, Shanghai TomsonCreeping bentgrass2
SCGuangdong ChaoshanCreeping bentgrass1
NC: North China; EC: East China; SC: South China.
Table 3. The infestation, frequency, abundance, and damage threshold of the main nematode genera in golf courses.
Table 3. The infestation, frequency, abundance, and damage threshold of the main nematode genera in golf courses.
Region 1Genus 2Infestation (%) 3Frequency (%)AbundanceMax (Individuals/100 cm3 of Soil)Damage Threshold 4 Samples above Threshold (%) 5
NCHelicotylenchus80.0075.001.89215600-
Mesocriconema60.0041.671.1648--
ECFilenchus35.7121.151.65392--
Paratrichodorus64.2959.621.36103809.68
Xiphinema42.8623.081.863282008.33
Hoplolaimus35.7123.081.47135150-
Ditylenchus35.7115.381.88315--
Meloidogyne21.4313.461.6110310028.57
SCHelicotylenchus83.3378.262.55290060033.33
Hemicriconemoides66.6747.831.0525--
Labrys33.3317.391.2045--
Mesocriconema33.3330.431.2981--
Meloidogyne16.6734.781.3710510012.5
1 NC: North China, EC: East China, SC: South China. 2 Nematode genera were selected according to the criteria of abundance greater than 1. 3 The infestation was defined as the number of golf courses having a particular nematode species divided by the total number of courses in this region, and is expressed as a percentage. 4 The damage threshold was defined as the number of nematodes required to cause economic damage on turfgrass, as suggested by Nelson (1995) and Stirling (2021). 5 Samples above threshold was defined as the percentage of samples above damage threshold in a specific region.
Table 4. Density and dominance of plant parasitic nematodes in healthy and problematic samples.
Table 4. Density and dominance of plant parasitic nematodes in healthy and problematic samples.
Golf CourseHealth Status 1Plant-Parasitic Nematodes Density (Individuals/100 cm3 of Soil)Dominance (%) 2
Beijing QinghewanH182.98
P332.78
Beijing LaffitteH575.55
P1146.04
Beijing YuyangH9814.16
P8917.87
Beijing CBDH21727.78
P11228.43
Suzhou Jinji LakeH192.64
P6610.87
Suzhou TaihuH40027.61
P32228.10
Changzhou KingswanH1128.85
P676.73
Nanjing Sun IslandH655.31
P33341.73
Nanjing ZhongshanH24124.69
P12215.31
Shaanxi Yulin DesertH276.05
P9118.80
Shanghai Sino-BayH1155.67
P12712.10
Shanghai LinksH13710.83
P593.86
Shanghai TomsonH266.88
P12731.91
Anhui Huangshan PineH679.33
P324.18
Shenzhou PeninsulaH8214.86
P223.50
Wanning Shanqin BayH290061.70
P42350.12
Sanya LuhuitouH52.76
P1910.86
Shenzhen Sand RiverH822.22
P10865.85
1 H: healthy sample, P: problematic sample. Samples with symptoms of turfgrass damage (stunted growth, less dense turf stands, shoot chlorosis, and root discolor) were defined as problematic samples, while samples that did not show any symptoms were defined as healthy samples. 2 Dominance (%)is expressed as the percentage of the number of plant-parasitic nematodes in the total number of nematodes.
Table 5. Diversity of plant-parasitic nematodes in North, South, and East China.
Table 5. Diversity of plant-parasitic nematodes in North, South, and East China.
RegionNumber of CoursesDiversity H’ 1Richness SR 2Evenness J’ 3Dominance λ 4Diversity H2 5
NC50.93 ± 0.01 b 660.98 ± 0.16 c0.41 ± 0.04 b0.62 ± 0.02 b0.48 ± 0.02 b
EC141.92 ± 0.01 a89.56 ± 0.31 a0.77 ± 0.05 a0.17 ± 0.01 c1.77 ± 0.05 a
SC60.42 ± 0.02 c88.36 ± 0.19 b0.18 ± 0.03 c0.85 ± 0.03 a0.17 ± 0.03 c
1 Diversity H’ = i = 1 s p i ln p i , p i = proportion of individuals of taxa i in the total population. H’ is commonly used to assess diversity, however, it may be dominated by the most abundant taxa or the overall number of taxa. 2 Richness SR = (s − 1) ln N, where s = the number of taxa (species) in the sample and N = the total number of nematodes identified in the sample. 3 Evenness J’ = H’/H’ max, where H’ max = ln s. 4 Dominance, λ = i = 1 s p i 2 is used to assess nematode dominance. 5 Diversity, H2 = − ln λ, is an alternative measure of diversity. 6 Differences in the listed items were analyzed by Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05). Different letters in a column in a group indicate significant differences between samples.
Table 6. Effect of turfgrass species on plant-parasitic nematode diversity in North, South, and East China 1.
Table 6. Effect of turfgrass species on plant-parasitic nematode diversity in North, South, and East China 1.
Turfgrass SpeciesNumber of SamplesDiversity H’Richness SREvenness J’Dominance λDiversity H2
Creeping bentgrass572.13 ± 0.02 a 2124.72 ± 2.15 a0.77 ± 0.04 a0.14 ± 0.02 c1.97 ± 0.03 a
Seashore paspalum170.21 ± 0.02 c79.06 ± 0.97 b0.09 ± 0.01 c0.93 ± 0.02 a0.07 ± 0.01 c
Hybrid bermudagrass131.36 ± 0.03 b42.89 ± 1.16 c0.65 ± 0.04 b0.33 ± 0.04 b1.11 ± 0.05 b
1 The definitions of the indices in this table are as shown in Table 5. 2 Differences in the listed items were analyzed by Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05). Different letters in a column in a group indicate significant differences between samples.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dong, Y.; Jin, P.; Zhang, H.; Hu, J.; Lamour, K.; Yang, Z. Distribution and Prevalence of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes of Turfgrass at Golf Courses in China. Biology 2022, 11, 1322. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11091322

AMA Style

Dong Y, Jin P, Zhang H, Hu J, Lamour K, Yang Z. Distribution and Prevalence of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes of Turfgrass at Golf Courses in China. Biology. 2022; 11(9):1322. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11091322

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dong, Yinglu, Peiyuan Jin, Huangwei Zhang, Jian Hu, Kurt Lamour, and Zhimin Yang. 2022. "Distribution and Prevalence of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes of Turfgrass at Golf Courses in China" Biology 11, no. 9: 1322. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11091322

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop