Next Article in Journal
Effect of Pond-Based Rice Floating Bed on the Microbial Community Structure and Quality of Water in Pond of Mandarin Fish Fed Using Artificial Diet
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Prenatal Dexamethasone Treatment and Post-Weaning Moderate Fructose Intake on Synaptic Plasticity and Behavior in Adult Male Wistar Rat Offspring
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evidence of Potential Anammox Activities from Rice Paddy Soils in Microaerobic and Anaerobic Conditions

by
Anamika Khanal
1,
Hyung-Geun Song
1,
Yu-Sung Cho
1,
Seo-Yeon Yang
1,
Won-Seok Kim
2,
Alpana Joshi
3,4,
Jiho Min
5 and
Ji-Hoon Lee
1,4,6,*
1
Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea
2
Division of Advanced Nuclear Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang 37673, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Agriculture Technology & Agri-Informatics, Shobhit Institute of Engineering & Technology, Meerut 250110, India
4
Department of Bioenvironmental Chemistry, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea
5
School of Chemical Engineering, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea
6
Institute of Agricultural Science & Technology, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2024, 13(7), 548; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13070548
Submission received: 12 June 2024 / Revised: 15 July 2024 / Accepted: 17 July 2024 / Published: 19 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Microbiology)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Anammox microorganisms are beneficial for use in wastewater treatment reactors. However, the application is limited due to the slow growth, high sensitivity, and the lack of a pure culture. To expand the sources of anammox bacteria, we used terrestrial soils from rice paddy fields to enrich and detect the anammox bacteria. This approach revealed potential anammox activities in both microaerobic and anaerobic soil conditions.

Abstract

Anammox, a reaction in which microorganisms oxidize ammonia under anaerobic conditions, is used in the industry to remove ammonium from wastewater in an environmentally friendly manner. This process does not produce intermediate products such as nitrite or nitrate, which can act as secondary pollutants in soil and water environments. For industrial applications, anammox bacteria should be obtained from the environment and cultivated. Anammox bacteria generally exhibit a slow growth rate and may not produce a large number of cells due to their anaerobic metabolism. Additionally, their habitats appear to be limited to specific environments, such as oxidation-reduction transition zones. Consequently, most of the anammox bacteria that are used or studied originate from marine environments. In this study, anammox bacterial evidence was found in rice paddy soil and cultured under various conditions of aerobic, microaerobic, and anaerobic batch incubations to determine whether enrichment was possible. The anammox-specific gene (hzsA) and microbial community analyses were performed on the incubated soils. Although it was not easy to enrich anammox bacteria due to co-occurrence of denitrification and nitrification based on the chemistry data, potential existence of anammox bacteria was assumed in the terrestrial paddy soil environment. For potential industrial uses, anammox bacteria could be searched for in rice paddy soils by applying optimal enrichment conditions.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Due to high nitrogen input to terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems from human activities such as the application of industrial nitrogen-based fertilizers, contamination with inorganic nitrogen compounds has been found and is an important issue in the agricultural and freshwater environments [1,2]. Highly accumulated inorganic nitrogen in the environment can be a serious pollution source and directly and/or indirectly influence human health [3,4]. For drinking water and wastewater treatments, nitrogen removal has been a central topic and microbial transformations of nitrogen compounds have been applied for the removal of inorganic nitrogen compounds [5,6,7]. Microorganisms transform nitrogen compounds via redox reactions including nitrification, denitrification, dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonia (DNRA), anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox), etc. [8,9,10]. In conventional wastewater treatment systems, the removal of nitrogen compounds is mainly achieved via microbial nitrification and denitrification processes. In general, ammonium in wastewater is oxidized to nitrite and nitrate by ammonium-oxidizing bacteria and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria. Then nitrate is anaerobically reduced to dinitrogen gas by denitrifying bacteria. Since the discovery of the anammox reaction [11], which is the anaerobic oxidation of ammonium and nitrite to dinitrogen gas, technologies using anammox reaction have been widely applied for nitrogen removal from wastewater treatment bioreactors [12,13,14]. For the full-scale bioreactors to treat wastewater using anammox reactions, enrichment or large-scale incubation of the bacterial cells would be one of the major issues, due to the known slow growth and high sensitivity of anammox bacteria [15,16,17]. Anammox microorganisms are highly sensitive to environmental factors and have a long doubling time of 2–3 weeks, resulting in an extended start-up period. These challenges hinder the large-scale application of anammox technology. The slow growth rate and high sensitivity of anammox bacteria, coupled with the absence of a pure culture, present significant obstacles to their efficient enrichment [18]. Consequently, developing effective techniques for enriching anammox bacteria is of considerable theoretical and practical importance [19].
Most cultures of anammox bacteria were enriched from sludges and marine origins using sequencing batch reactors (SBRs) [20]; however, anammox activities and molecular evidence have been repeatedly reported from terrestrial environments including rice paddy soils [21]. To expand the sources of anammox microorganisms for various applications, it is essential to explore enrichment possibilities from less-studied environmental media. In this study, we investigated suitable conditions for anammox enrichment from rice paddy soils. To simplify anammox enrichment using batch incubations without a sequencing batch reactor (SBR), we conducted several batch incubations and compared various conditions for anammox enrichment, focusing on the presence of oxygen, by incubating rice paddy soils in growth media with NO2 and NH4+ under microaerobic and anaerobic conditions. Our goal was to develop effective anammox enrichment methods and compare three different experimental setups to identify the optimal conditions for enrichment using rice paddy sediments. Throughout the experiments, we monitored specific genes and microbial community structures over time to observe enhanced enrichment of anammox microorganisms in the three different incubation types. This study explored strategies to enrich and/or accelerate the activity of anammox bacteria using natural soil samples rather than activated sludges from wastewater treatment bioreactors.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Setups

2.1.1. Experiment 1: Anaerobic Batch

Rice paddy soil (156 g) collected from approximately 20–30 cm depth of a local rice field (Figure S1A) was inoculated to 1 L of the anammox medium, composed of (per liter) 350 mg NaHCO3, 6 mg KH2PO4, 12 mg MgSO4·7H2O, 48 mg CaCl2·2H2O, 2 g HEPES, 69 mg NaNO2, 66.07 mg (NH4)2SO4, 1 mL trace element solution I, and 1 mL trace element solution II (Figure S1B). The trace element solution I was composed of (per L) 5 g EDTA and 5 g FeSO4·7H2O and the trace element solution II included (per L) 0.43 g ZnSO4·7H2O, 0.24 g CoCl2·6H2O, 0.99 g MnCl2·4H2O, 0.25 g CuSO4·5H2O, 0.22 g NaMoO4·2H2O, 0.19 g NiCl2·6H2O, 0.21 g Na2SeO4·10H2O, and 0.014 g H3BO3. The medium-containing 2-L Wheaton bottle was purged with 100% N2 gas for both the headspace and the solution at least for 30 min and was sealed with a chlorobutyl-isoprene rubber stopper. All the soil samples were sampled from the rice paddy field site, located inside the Rural Development Administration, Jeonju, South Korea (latitude 35°49′42.4″ N and longitude 127°02′38.4″ E; Figure S1A) [22]. The flow chart of this study is presented in Figure 1.
The slurry samples were analyzed for concentrations of nitrite, nitrate, and ammonium. Nitrate concentration was measured via the cadmium reduction method using Hach NitraVer 5 reagent (Loveland, CO, USA) at a wavelength of 400 nm and nitrite concentration was measured via the diazotization method using Hach NitriVer 3 reagent (Loveland, CO, USA) at 507 nm. Ammonium concentration was measured via the Nessler method using Hach Ammonia-Nitrogen reagent (Loveland, CO, USA) at 425 nm.
The gene copy number of the hydrazine synthase subunit A, hzsA gene, which is one of the central enzymes for anammox reactions [23], was monitored via quantitative PCR analysis using the Bio-Rad CFX Connect Real-Time System (Hercules, CA, USA) during the incubation period. A standard curve of hzsA gene was prepared for absolute amount gene copy number analysis. The DNA was inserted into a plasmid, quantified, and measured for generating a standard curve presenting the correlation between the Cq values and the number of gene copies. The primer set of hzsA_382F and hzsA_1857R used for this analysis is presented in Table S1.
Bacterial community structures of the soils were monitored using bacterial 16S rRNA gene amplicons analyzed via Illumina MiSeq (San Diego, CA, USA) along with the incubation times at 1 day, 15 days, and 56 days. Soil genomic DNA was extracted from 0.25 g soil for each sample using a DNeasy PowerSoil kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and three individual tubes were pooled into one sample. The genomic DNAs were subjected to PCR using 341F and 805R primers to amplify the v3–v4 region of 16S rRNA gene for the predicted length of 428 bp, and adapters and indices were attached to the gene fragments by the library preparation procedures for the Illumina MiSeq sequencing. Paired-end sequencing (250 bp × 2) was performed, and the raw data of the DNA sequence (fastq) were analyzed using Mothur version 1.44.3 [24]. The data analysis was performed with a series of procedures including constructing contigs and quality controls such as removing sequencing errors, chimeric sequences using VSEARCH, and nonbacterial reads. Sequences were aligned using the Silva database (v. 132) [25], and clustered to operational taxonomic unit (OTU) via 3% dissimilarity. Taxa were assigned and classified using the RDP database [26].

2.1.2. Experiment 2: Microaerobic Column Batch

To mimic a submerged rice paddy field, the same paddy soil (30 g) was added to the anammox medium (100 mL) contained in a 100-mL column type cylinder to let the oxygen gradient develop naturally along with the depth (Figure S1C). The soils were subsampled aseptically at the depths of 3 cm and 7 cm by using 10-mL serological pipettes for up to 80 days. For anammox activity, concentrations of ammonium and nitrite were analyzed along with the incubation times, and certain genes specific for nitrification and anammox were monitored via quantitative PCR analysis. Along with the hzsA gene, amoA and nxrB genes, encoding ammonium monooxygenase [27] and nitrite oxidoreductase [28], respectively, were monitored with incubation time for their absolute copy numbers. The primer sets for the amoA and nxrB genes are shown in Table S1.

2.1.3. Experiment 3: Comparison of Aerobic and Anaerobic Incubations

To compare the development of anammox bacteria in the rice paddy soils between aerobic and anaerobic conditions, the same soils were incubated in the anammox media under aerobic and anaerobic conditions in two individual 1 L bottles (Figure S1D). Each 50 g of paddy soil was added to 90 mL of anammox medium; one culture was prepared aerobically, and the other culture was prepared anaerobically by purging with 100% N2. The sediment samples were collected from both the cultures at day 0 and day 30. Concentrations of nitrite and ammonia were analyzed to detect potential anammox reaction. Together with the hzsA gene, bacterial 16S rRNA gene was quantitatively analyzed for its absolute copy numbers to compare the ratios of anammox bacteria to total bacteria. The primer set of 16S rRNA gene (27F and 519R) is listed in Table S1. Also, to compare the aerobic and anaerobic enrichment incubations, bacterial community structures of both soils were analyzed via Illumina MiSeq sequencing of v3–v4 regions of 16S rRNA gene. The sequenced data were deposited at NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) with the BioProject accession numbers of PRJNA1060457 and PRJNA1062134.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Anaerobic Batch Culture of the Rice Paddy Soil (Experiment 1)

To examine whether anammox bacteria can be enriched from the paddy soil in anaerobically prepared batch culture, the soil was incubated anaerobically in the anammox medium for approximately 4 months. The pH of the soil batch was stable during the whole period of the incubation (Figure 2A). Concentrations of nitrite and nitrate decreased to almost below detection from the initial 0.85 mM and 2.5 mM, respectively after 29 days, and ammonia decreased gradually from the initial 0.86 mM to 0.63 mM by 90 days with a rebound up to 0.78 mM by 109 days (Figure 2A). The overall anammox reaction usually consumes ammonium and nitrite at a 1:1 ratio, resulting in dinitrogen [11]. However, in this incubation, nitrite consumption (0.85 mM) was three times larger than ammonium consumption (0.23 mM) (Figure 2A). This may not be only due to anammox reaction but possibly the denitrification reaction included as well in the soils/sediments. Probably the nitrate consumption (2.5 mM) indicated the presence of denitrification, which also reduces nitrite. The gene encoding hydrazine synthase subunit A, hzsA, which is one of the central enzymes for anammox reactions, was quantitated from the incubation soils via quantitative PCR (Figure 2B). The hydrazine synthase (HZS) combines ammonium (NH4+) with nitric oxide (NO) to generate hydrazine (N2H4), which is eventually oxidized to dinitrogen gas (N2) by hydrazine dehydrogenase [29]. The absolute copy number of the hzsA gene per gram of soil increased by nearly double to 9.0 × 105 genes/g after 15 days of incubation from the initial 4.5 × 105 genes/g and maintained approximately 7.0 × 105 genes/g for the rest of the incubation period (Figure 2B). A decrease in the amounts of anammox-specific hzsA gene and nitrite used as an electron acceptor along with the gradual decrease in ammonia indicated potential enrichment of anammox bacteria from the anaerobic batch culture of the soil.
To compare the bacterial community changes in the anaerobic batch by time of culture, the 16S rRNA gene of the culture samples on days 1 (BR_D01), 15 (BR_D15), and 56 (BR_D56) was analyzed via MiSeq sequencing. At each time point two soil suspension samples (_a and _b) were prepared (a total of six samples), and genomic DNAs were extracted, followed by the gene library preparation for the Miseq sequencing. Data processing including contig assembly, quality controls, chimera removal using Mothur-moduled Vsearch [30], and nonbacterial sequence removal was performed by using Mothur, resulting in a reduction of sequence numbers from the initial 959,826 to the total final reads of 162,907 with the total OTU number of 13,497.
The smallest sequence number from the BR_D56_a was used for normalization of all the samples for alpha-diversity analysis (Table S2). The Good’s coverage values ranged from 0.90 to 0.93 among the six samples, suggesting that approximately more than 90% of the indigenous bacteria were sequenced. The OTU number and Chao1 index showed gradual decreases with the incubation time, though the differences were not large, indicating an overall decrease in species number along with time (Table S2). The diversity indices of Shannon and inverse Simpson showed rather complicated patterns of decreases at 15 days and then increases at 56 days (Table S2). Since these indices represent species evenness as well as species richness, some of dominant bacteria became relatively evenly enriched, less skewed with the incubation progressed.
From the bar chart of relative sequence abundance, the dominant phyla Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, Proteobacteria, Parcubacteria, Actinobacteria, and Firmicutes showed noticeable variations during the incubation time at the points of day 1, 15 days, and 56 days (Figure 3A and Figure S2). The communities of day 15 and day 56 were distinctively separated with distant groups via the dendrogram using Bray–Curtis dissimilarity in the heatmap (Figure S2), suggesting changes in the communities over time. The phylum Planctomycetes to which anammox bacteria belong appeared up to 0.5–0.9% of each sample.
The most abundant 50 genera among the total 337 were used for the sequence abundance-based heatmap with dendrograms using the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity (Figure 3B). A few genera including unclassified Anaerolineaceae, unclassified Gp1, unclassified Gp3, unclassified Parcubacteria, unclassified Chloroflexi, unclassified Acidobacteria Gp3, and unclassified Rhizobiales accounted for a large proportion of the bacterial communities across the samples (Figure 3B and Figure S3). As in the phylum level heatmap, the communities of day 15 and day 56 were grouped separately in the genus level heatmap (Figure 3B). In particular, the genus Tepidisphaera belonging to the phylum Planctomycetes was ranked 28th among 337 genera (Figure S3). Since little is known about this genus and its function with only one species [31], a potential linkage with the anammox reaction can be considered.
Distances among the samples were calculated based on the Yue and Clayton’s dissimilarity and analyzed for nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) (Figure 3C). The formed clusters of the two replicate samples at each time point indicate the changes in microbial communities over time.

3.2. Microaerobic Column Batch (Experiment 2)

In a sedimentary environment submerged in water such as paddy soil, there is a big difference in the dissolved oxygen concentration in the shallow (a few centimeters) and deep (tens of centimeters) sedimentary soils, and accordingly there is a big difference in the oxidation/reduction potential. Therefore, it can be expected that nitrifying bacteria that oxidize ammonia aerobically act in the shallow depth of sedimentary soil, and the nitrite (NO2) generated from the nitrification reaction can be used as the electron acceptor for anammox bacteria, anaerobically oxidizing NH4+ at deeper soils. Since nitrite, which is essential for anammox reaction, exists in a transient state in the environment, nitrifying bacteria may induce anammox reaction.
To mimic aqueous sedimentary environments such as streams and riverbeds, the previously anammox-enriched paddy soils were submerged in the column-type of freshwater media with natural oxygen gradient over the depth (Figure S1C). The pH, nitrite (NO2), and ammonium (NH4+) were monitored over time (Figure 4A). A decrease in pH was observed as the culture progressed, which was presumed to be due to the production of NO2 and NO3 via nitrification and/or oxidation of NH4+ provided in the culture medium at the initial concentration of 0.5 mM. Nitrite concentration decreased along with ammonia, which may be the result of denitrification and/or anammox reaction (Figure 4A). Specific genes mediating the reactions of nitrification and anammox were detected over time and along with the depths (Figure 4B–D). Nitrification is characterized mostly by two-step reactions using amoA gene encoding ammonia monooxygenase subunit A, which oxidizes ammonia to nitrite, and nxrB gene encoding the beta subunit of nitrite oxidoreductase, which oxidizes nitrite to nitrate. Absolute gene copy number of amoA in the unit soil increased at a depth of 3 cm only in the early period (20 days), whereas it increased gradually toward the latter part of the reaction (60 days) at a depth of 7 cm (Figure 4B). This might suggest that ammonia oxidation to nitrite increased in the sediment more actively in the deeper sediment at 7 cm, which was consistent with the decrease in ammonia in the media (Figure 4A). Similarly, the nxrB gene also showed a gradual increase in the sediment, but more actively in the upper parts at 3 cm, indicating oxidation of nitrite to nitrate, concomitantly with oxidation of ammonia (Figure 4C). On the contrary, at the depth of 7 cm, there was not much increase in nxrB, which may suggest nitrite utilization not by aerobic nitrification, but potentially by anaerobic reaction of anammox. The hzsA gene, which is a subunit of the hydrazine synthase, representing a unique phylogenetic marker for anammox bacteria, was found to exist across the depths, despite relatively low absolute amounts in both the depths compared to amoA and nxrB genes (Figure 4D).

3.3. Comparison of Aerobic and Anaerobic Incubations (Experiment 3)

To compare the development of anammox bacteria in the rice paddy soils between aerobic and anaerobic conditions, the same soils were incubated in the anammox media under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. It was found that the initial amounts of nitrite were mostly consumed by 30 days in both the aerobic (AES) and anaerobic (ANS) incubations (Figure 5A), whereas ammonium decreases were minor compared to the nitrite decreases in both the conditions. This may suggest that denitrification was dominant rather than nitrification and/or anammox in both the AES and ANS incubations.
From the same incubations, bacterial 16S rRNA gene and hzsA gene were quantitatively analyzed. The initial number of 16S rRNA gene (1.51 × 1010 ± 2.70 × 109 copy/g soil) decreased to 1.14 × 1010 ± 2.11 × 109 copy/g soil and 8.02 × 109 ± 1.92 × 109 copy/g both in the AES and ANS, respectively, after 30 days of incubation (Figure 5B). The hzsA gene also showed a similar tendency to the 16S rRNA gene, and the gene copy numbers were reduced from the initial number of 3.98 × 105 ± 1.10 × 105 copy/g soil to 3.57 × 105 ± 1.14 × 105 copy/g soil and 1.68 × 105 ± 2.75 × 104 copy/g soil, respectively, for the AES and ANS at 30 days (Figure 5B). Although the absolute amounts of the genes decreased over time, the ratios of hzsA gene to 16S rRNA gene increased over time, from the initial 4.02 to 5.95 and 5.51, respectively, for the AES and ANS (Table S3). The decrease in bacterial abundances inferred by 16S rRNA gene copies was probably due to the incubation conditions without continuous feeding or added organic materials. However, as the incubations progressed, the ratios of hzsA gene increased, indicating that conditions were changing favorably for anammox rather than many types of heterotrophs. The aerobic incubation, AES showed a higher ratio of hzsA gene rather than the anaerobic incubation, ANS, which may suggest that the gradual consumption of dissolved oxygen may have developed a microaerobic or oxic-anoxic transition zone, probably favored by anammox, in the AES incubation. The oxygen in the initial atmosphere and the medium of the AES incubation may have been consumed over time, and a microaerobic environment would have been created as it progressed. Although it was difficult to estimate the anammox response using only the chemistry data of nitrite, ammonium, etc., the presence of anammox bacteria could be estimated to some extent due to the relative increase in the anammox-specific gene. Also, the chemistry data could be explained by combined reactions of anammox and (de)nitrification, specifically at the redox boundary.
The bacterial community was analyzed for the initial soil (ACT00), aerobic soil at 30 days (AES30), and anaerobic soil at 30 days (ANS30) by amplifying bacterial 16S rRNA gene v4 region using the Illumina MiSeq System. The final sequence read was 37,384 for the whole three samples, and the total number of OTUs was 4442. Looking at the diversity indices of bacterial communities, the observed species (or OTU) and Chao1 index, indicating the species richness or number of species, showed a larger decrease in the aerobic soil than the anaerobic soil (Table S4). Shannon and inverse Simpson indices, indicating both species abundance and evenness, decreased similarly with the OTU numbers and Chao1 index.
The whole bacterial community across the samples was classified into 24 phyla (Figure S4A). The major phyla included Chloroflexi, Acidobacteria, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, etc., (Figure S4B) and phylum Planctomycetes, to which anammox bacteria belong, occupied approximately 2% of the sequence abundances (2.1%, 1.7%, and 1.9%, respectively, for ACT00, AES30, and ANS30). Phyla Chloroflexi and Proteobacteria increased rather in the aerobic incubation (AES30) than ANS30, and in the phylum Chloroflexi, there are many types of phototrophs, possibly suggesting paddy soil conditions.
The bacterial communities indicated a total of 268 genera, with 20 genera showing ratios of 1% or more in individual samples (Figure S5). Two genera of unclassified Bacteria and unclassified Anaerolineaceae occupied approximately 41–42% of each sample. The family Anaerolineaceae was reported in aquatic sediments and anaerobic digesters as fermenters [32], which may be characteristic for long-term anaerobic incubation. There was no significant difference in taxa between the samples at genus level. Among phylum Plactomycetes, a taxon, classified as Planctomycetaceae_unclassified which was not classified below the family, showed the highest sequence abundance ratios at genus level (0.66%, 0.77%, and 0.54%, respectively, for ACT00, AES30, and ANS30). A total of nine genera of Planctomycetes were identified, including three taxa not classified below certain levels: Phycisphaerae_unclassified, Phycisphaera, Tepidisphaera, Planctomycetes_unclassified, Aquisphaera, Gemmata, Pirellula, Planctomycetaceae_unclassified, and Zavarzinella. However, no known anammox bacterium was identified from the sequences.
Analyzing the time-series chemistry data of the microaerobic column incubation, the nxrB gene, which encodes the beta-subunit of nitrite oxidoreductase, showed an increase over time compared to the amoA gene at a depth of 3 cm (Figure 4B,C). Additionally, at this depth, the hzsA gene remained relatively stable compared to its levels at a depth of 7 cm (Figure 4D). The anammox reaction requires nitrite as the electron acceptor, with nitrite being reduced to nitric oxide via nitrate reductase (NirS) in the anammox process [33]. However, nitrite reduction can also occur via nitrite oxidoreductase [28]. Therefore, the simultaneous increase and/or stable levels of the nxrB and hzsA genes at the 3 cm depth may strongly indicate anammox activity.
Based on these results, anammox activity was more prominent in the microaerobic depth than in the deeper anaerobic conditions. This could be because nitrite is more readily available in microaerobic conditions due to the activity of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, such as the aerobic nitrifier Nitrosomonas, whereas nitrification does not occur under anaerobic conditions, where anammox bacteria compete for nitrite with denitrifying bacteria. Studies have shown that the combination of partial nitrification and anammox creates optimal conditions for anammox bacteria growth, facilitating enhanced nitrogen removal from municipal wastewater [34,35]. In such redox (anoxic/oxic) transition zones, the presence of substrates like nitrite can support the growth of anammox bacteria.
In Experiment 1, nitrite concentration was nearly depleted after one month, coinciding with an increase in the anammox-specific gene hzsA (Figure 2). We speculated that anammox activity would manifest within one month and thus compared aerobic and anaerobic incubations over this time frame in Experiment 3. Although the microbial communities were not directly comparable due to different sampling times, there were shared abundances of certain taxa at the phylum level, including Chloroflexi, Acidobacteria, Parcubacteria, and Actinobacteria, etc. (Figure 3 and Figure S4). Furthermore, both 16S amplicon sequencing analyses detected the phylum Planctomycetes, suggesting the potential presence of anammox microorganisms.

4. Conclusions

Although we could not confirm the anammox reaction with chemistry data, based on the chemistry data and the bacterial specific functional genes, we could speculate reactions of not only anammox bacteria but also denitrifying bacteria and nitrifying bacteria in the paddy soils. It might be difficult to completely rule out the anammox reaction with only physicochemical data. The increase in the ratio of the hydrazine synthetase gene compared to the 16S rRNA gene may suggest evidence for an active but minor reaction of anammox bacteria in the paddy soils. Also, there may be the potential for anammox bacteria presence in the unclassified Planctomycetes identified in the bacterial communities.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology13070548/s1, Table S1. Primer sequences used in this study; Table S2. Alpha-diversity of the microbial communities from the anaerobic batch incubation (Experiment 1); Table S3. Ratios of hzsA gene to 16S rRNA gene from the compared aerobic and anaerobic incubations (Experiment 3); Table S4. Alpha-diversity of the microbial communities from the compared aerobic and anaerobic incubations (Experiment 3); Figure S1. Anammox enrichment batches using rice paddy soils from Rural Development Administration field, Jeonju, South Korea (A). (B) Experiment 1—anaerobic incubation, (C) Experiment 2—microaerobic column incubation, (D) Experiment 3—compared aerobic and anaerobic incubations; Figure S2. Heatmap of the sequence abundance at the phylum level for the anaerobic incubation (Experiment 1). Vertical and horizontal dendrograms based on the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity; Figure S3. Relative sequence abundance of the top 30 genera for the anaerobic incubation (Experiment 1); Figure S4. Relative sequence abundance (A) and its heatmap (B) of phyla from the compared aerobic and anaerobic incubations (Experiment 3); Figure S5. Relative sequence abundance (A) and its heatmap (B) of top 20 genera from the compared aerobic and anaerobic incubations (Experiment 3). References [36,37,38,39,40] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.-H.L. and A.K.; methodology, A.K., H.-G.S., Y.-S.C. and S.-Y.Y.; formal analysis, A.K., H.-G.S., Y.-S.C. and S.-Y.Y.; data curation, J.-H.L. and A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, J.-H.L., A.K. and A.J.; writing—review and editing, J.-H.L., W.-S.K., J.M. and A.J.; project administration, H.-G.S., Y.-S.C. and S.-Y.Y.; funding acquisition, J.-H.L. and W.-S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2016R1D1A3B01012231) and in part this work was supported by the Technology Innovation Program (Alchemist project, 20025639) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE, Korea).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Raw sequence data generated for this study are available at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) with the BioProject accession numbers of PRJNA1060457 and PRJNA1062134.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ahmed, M.; Rauf, M.; Mukhtar, Z.; Saeed, N.A. Excessive use of nitrogenous fertilizers: An unawareness causing serious threats to environment and human health. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 26983–26987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ibrahim, K.A.; Naz, M.Y.; Shukrullah, S.; Sulaiman, S.A.; Ghaffar, A.; AbdEl-Salam, N.M. Nitrogen pollution impact and remediation through low cost starch based biodegradable polymers. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Liu, M.; Shang, F.; Lu, X.; Huang, X.; Song, Y.; Liu, B.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, X.; Cao, J.; Xu, T.; et al. Unexpected response of nitrogen deposition to nitrogen oxide controls and implications for land carbon sink. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mosley, O.E.; Gios, E.; Close, M.; Weaver, L.; Daughney, C.; Handley, K.M. Nitrogen cycling and microbial cooperation in the terrestrial subsurface. ISME J. 2022, 16, 2561–2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jia, H.; Yuan, Q. Removal of nitrogen from wastewater using microalgae and microalgae–bacteria consortia. Cogent Environ. Sci. 2016, 2, 1275089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rajta, A.; Bhatia, R.; Setia, H.; Pathania, P. Role of heterotrophic aerobic denitrifying bacteria in nitrate removal from wastewater. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 128, 1261–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zhou, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Zhu, J.; Li, C.; Chen, G. A comprehensive review on wastewater nitrogen removal and its recovery processes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kraft, B.; Tegetmeyer, H.E.; Sharma, R.; Klotz, M.G.; Ferdelman, T.G.; Hettich, R.L.; Geelhoed, J.S.; Strous, M. The environmental controls that govern the end product of bacterial nitrate respiration. Science 2014, 345, 676–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kuypers, M.M.M.; Marchant, H.K.; Kartal, B. The microbial nitrogen-cycling network. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 16, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Seruga, P.; Krzywonos, M.; Pyżanowska, J.; Urbanowska, A.; Pawlak-Kruczek, H.; Niedźwiecki, Ł. Removal of ammonia from the municipal waste treatment effluents using natural minerals. Molecules 2019, 24, 3633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. van de Graaf, A.A.; de Bruijn, P.; Robertson, L.A.; Jetten, M.S.M.; Kuenen, J.G. Autotrophic growth of anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing micro-organisms in a fluidized bed reactor. Microbiology 1996, 142, 2187–2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Date, Y.; Isaka, K.; Ikuta, H.; Sumino, T.; Kaneko, N.; Yoshie, S.; Tsuneda, S.; Inamori, Y. Microbial diversity of anammox bacteria enriched from different types of seed sludge in an anaerobic continuous-feeding cultivation reactor. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2009, 107, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Du, R.; Horn, H.; Cao, S. Maximizing anammox in mainstream wastewater treatment: An integrated nitrite producing approach. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 468, 143696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fan, N.-S.; Bai, Y.-H.; Wu, J.; Zhang, Q.; Fu, J.-J.; Zhou, W.-L.; Huang, B.-C.; Jin, R.-C. A two-stage anammox process for the advanced treatment of high-strength ammonium wastewater: Microbial community and nitrogen transformation. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 261, 121148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fu, Y.; Wen, X.; Huang, J.; Sun, D.; Jin, L. Advances in the efficient enrichment of anammox bacteria. Water 2023, 15, 2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kuenen, J.G. Anammox bacteria: From discovery to application. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Niederdorfer, R.; Hausherr, D.; Palomo, A.; Wei, J.; Magyar, P.; Smets, B.F.; Joss, A.; Bürgmann, H. Temperature modulates stress response in mainstream anammox reactors. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Liu, L.; Hu, M.; Wang, C.; Qi, W.; Peng, Y. Enrichment of anammox bacteria using anammox sludge as a primer combined with ordinary activated sludge. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ren, Z.-Q.; Wang, H.; Zhang, L.-G.; Du, X.-N.; Huang, B.-C.; Jin, R.-C. A review of anammox-based nitrogen removal technology: From microbial diversity to engineering applications. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 363, 127896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lu, Y.; Natarajan, G.; Nguyen, T.Q.N.; Thi, S.S.; Arumugam, K.; Seviour, T.; Williams, R.B.H.; Wuertz, S.; Law, Y. Controlling anammox speciation and biofilm attachment strategy using N-biotransformation intermediates and organic carbon levels. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 21720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Khanal, A.; Lee, J.-H. Functional diversity and abundance of nitrogen cycle-related genes in paddy soil. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2020, 63, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Khanal, A.; Lee, S.; Lee, J.-H. Detection and potential abundances of anammox bacteria in the paddy soil. Korean J. Environ. Agric. 2020, 39, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kartal, B.; Keltjens, J.T. Anammox biochemistry: A tale of heme c proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2016, 41, 998–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Schloss, P.D.; Westcott, S.L.; Ryabin, T.; Hall, J.R.; Hartmann, M.; Hollister, E.B.; Lesniewski, R.A.; Oakley, B.B.; Parks, D.H.; Robinson, C.J.; et al. Introducing mothur: Open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 7537–7541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Quast, C.; Pruesse, E.; Yilmaz, P.; Gerken, J.; Schweer, T.; Yarza, P.; Peplies, J.; Glockner, F.O. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, D590–D596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, Q.; Garrity, G.M.; Tiedje, J.M.; Cole, J.R. Naïve Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 5261–5267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hatzenpichler, R. Diversity, physiology, and niche differentiation of ammonia-oxidizing archaea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 7501–7510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Pester, M.; Maixner, F.; Berry, D.; Rattei, T.; Koch, H.; Lücker, S.; Nowka, B.; Richter, A.; Spieck, E.; Lebedeva, E.; et al. NxrB encoding the beta subunit of nitrite oxidoreductase as functional and phylogenetic marker for nitrite-oxidizing Nitrospira. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 3055–3071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Wang, Y.; Ma, X.; Zhou, S.; Lin, X.; Ma, B.; Park, H.-D.; Yan, Y. Expression of the nirS, hzsA, and hdh genes in response to nitrite shock and recovery in Candidatus Kuenenia stuttgartiensis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 6940–6947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rognes, T.; Flouri, T.; Nichols, B.; Quince, C.; Mahé, F. VSEARCH: A versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 2016, 4, e2584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kovaleva, O.L.; Merkel, A.Y.; Novikov, A.A.; Baslerov, R.V.; Toshchakov, S.V.; Bonch-Osmolovskaya, E.A. Tepidisphaera mucosa gen. nov., sp. nov., a moderately thermophilic member of the class Phycisphaerae in the phylum Planctomycetes, and proposal of a new family, Tepidisphaeraceae fam. nov., and a new order, Tepidisphaerales ord. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 549–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. McIlroy, S.J.; Kirkegaard, R.H.; Dueholm, M.S.; Fernando, E.; Karst, S.M.; Albertsen, M.; Nielsen, P.H. Culture-independent analyses reveal novel Anaerolineaceae as abundant primary fermenters in anaerobic digesters treating waste activated sludge. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. van Niftrik, L.; Geerts, W.J.C.; van Donselaar, E.G.; Humbel, B.M.; Webb, R.I.; Fuerst, J.A.; Verkleij, A.J.; Jetten, M.S.M.; Strous, M. Linking ultrastructure and function in four genera of anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing bacteria: Cell plan, glycogen storage, and localization of cytochrome c proteins. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 708–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, Z.; Wu, Y.; Wang, C.; Cai, T.; Li, X.; Wu, P. Mainstream anammox driven by micro-oxygen nitrification and partial denitrification using step-feed for advanced nitrogen removal from municipal wastewater. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 378, 134544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hou, X.H.; Li, X.Y.; Zhu, X.R.; Li, W.Y.; Kao, C.K.; Peng, Y.Z. Advanced nitrogen removal from municipal wastewater through partial nitrification-denitrification coupled with anammox in step-feed continuous system. Bioresour. Technol. 2024, 391, 129967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Brunk, C.F.; Avaniss-Aghajani, E.; Brunk, C.A. A computer analysis of primer and probe hybridization potential with bacterial small-subunit rRNA sequences. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62, 872–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Harhangi, H.R.; Le Roy, M.; van Alen, T.; Hu, B.L.; Groen, J.; Kartal, B.; Tringe, S.G.; Quan, Z.X.; Jetten, M.S.; Op den Camp, H.J. Hydrazine synthase, a unique phylomarker with which to study the presence and biodiversity of anammox bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 752–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Herlemann, D.P.R.; Labrenz, M.; Jürgens, K.; Bertilsson, S.; Waniek, J.J.; Andersson, A.F. Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. ISME J. 2011, 5, 1571–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Lücker, S.; Wagner, M.; Maixner, F.; Pelletier, E.; Koch, H.; Vacherie, B.; Rattei, T.; Damsté, J.S.S.; Spieck, E.; Le Paslier, D.; et al. A Nitrospira metagenome illuminates the physiology and evolution of globally important nitrite-oxidizing bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 13479–13484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rotthauwe, J.H.; Witzel, K.P.; Liesack, W. The ammonia monooxygenase structural gene amoA as a functional marker: Molecular fine-scale analysis of natural ammonia-oxidizing populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 4704–4712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flow chart of this study including the different incubation schemes.
Figure 1. Flow chart of this study including the different incubation schemes.
Biology 13 00548 g001
Figure 2. Anaerobic batch incubation. (A) Concentrations of nitrite, nitrate, and ammonium. (B) Absolute copy numbers of hzsA gene during the incubation period.
Figure 2. Anaerobic batch incubation. (A) Concentrations of nitrite, nitrate, and ammonium. (B) Absolute copy numbers of hzsA gene during the incubation period.
Biology 13 00548 g002
Figure 3. Anaerobic batch incubation. (A) Relative sequence abundance at phylum level over selected time points. (B) Sequence abundance-based heatmap with dendrograms using the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. (C) Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) of distances among the samples based on Yue and Clayton’s dissimilarity.
Figure 3. Anaerobic batch incubation. (A) Relative sequence abundance at phylum level over selected time points. (B) Sequence abundance-based heatmap with dendrograms using the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. (C) Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) of distances among the samples based on Yue and Clayton’s dissimilarity.
Biology 13 00548 g003
Figure 4. Microaerobic column batch incubation. (A) Chemistry data during the incubation period. (BD) Absolute gene copy numbers of amoA, nxrB, and hzsA gene, respectively, at the sediment depths of 3 cm and 7 cm.
Figure 4. Microaerobic column batch incubation. (A) Chemistry data during the incubation period. (BD) Absolute gene copy numbers of amoA, nxrB, and hzsA gene, respectively, at the sediment depths of 3 cm and 7 cm.
Biology 13 00548 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of short-term incubations. (A) Concentrations of nitrite and ammonium, and (B) absolute gene copy numbers of 16S rRNA gene and hzsA gene from the compared aerobic and anaerobic incubations for selected times.
Figure 5. Comparison of short-term incubations. (A) Concentrations of nitrite and ammonium, and (B) absolute gene copy numbers of 16S rRNA gene and hzsA gene from the compared aerobic and anaerobic incubations for selected times.
Biology 13 00548 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khanal, A.; Song, H.-G.; Cho, Y.-S.; Yang, S.-Y.; Kim, W.-S.; Joshi, A.; Min, J.; Lee, J.-H. Evidence of Potential Anammox Activities from Rice Paddy Soils in Microaerobic and Anaerobic Conditions. Biology 2024, 13, 548. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13070548

AMA Style

Khanal A, Song H-G, Cho Y-S, Yang S-Y, Kim W-S, Joshi A, Min J, Lee J-H. Evidence of Potential Anammox Activities from Rice Paddy Soils in Microaerobic and Anaerobic Conditions. Biology. 2024; 13(7):548. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13070548

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khanal, Anamika, Hyung-Geun Song, Yu-Sung Cho, Seo-Yeon Yang, Won-Seok Kim, Alpana Joshi, Jiho Min, and Ji-Hoon Lee. 2024. "Evidence of Potential Anammox Activities from Rice Paddy Soils in Microaerobic and Anaerobic Conditions" Biology 13, no. 7: 548. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13070548

APA Style

Khanal, A., Song, H. -G., Cho, Y. -S., Yang, S. -Y., Kim, W. -S., Joshi, A., Min, J., & Lee, J. -H. (2024). Evidence of Potential Anammox Activities from Rice Paddy Soils in Microaerobic and Anaerobic Conditions. Biology, 13(7), 548. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13070548

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop