Next Article in Journal
Advances in Regenerative and Reconstructive Medicine in the Prevention and Treatment of Bone Infections
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Probiotic Supplementation on Body Weight, Growth Performance, Immune Function, Intestinal Microbiota and Metabolites in Fallow Deer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Paternal Mitochondrial DNA Leakage in Natural Populations of Large-Scale Loach, Paramisgurnus dabryanus

1
College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy, Zhengzhou 450046, China
2
College of Fisheries, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
3
Agronomy and Life Science Department, Zhaotong University, Zhaotong 657000, China
4
Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biology 2024, 13(8), 604; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13080604
Submission received: 17 July 2024 / Revised: 2 August 2024 / Accepted: 8 August 2024 / Published: 10 August 2024

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Mitochondrial DNA is generally thought to strictly follow maternal inheritance, meaning that vertebrates have just one type of mitochondrial DNA haplotype. However, a very interesting phenomenon occurs in a fish species, Paramisgurnus dabryanus (P. dabryanus), regarding the presence of two distinct mitochondria in one individual. Phylogenetic analysis suggested that interspecific hybridization may occur between P. dabryanus and Misgurnus anguillicaudatus, leading to the transfer of mitochondrial DNA from the father to their offspring. The investigation of natural populations across regions demonstrated that this species commonly possesses two types of mitochondria. Furthermore, qPCR analysis suggested that type I plays a major role. The results of this study help us better understand how animal mitochondrial DNA can differ due to paternal contribution, giving us useful ideas about how mitochondrial genomes evolve and are passed down.

Abstract

Animal mitochondrial DNA is usually considered to comply with strict maternal inheritance, and only one mitochondrial DNA haplotype exists in an individual. However, mitochondrial heteroplasmy, the occurrence of more than one mitochondrial haplotype, has recently been reported in some animals, such as mice, mussels, and birds. This study conducted extensive field surveys to obtain representative samples to investigate the existence of paternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in natural fish populations. Evidence of paternal mitochondrial DNA leakage of P. dabryanus was discovered using high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatics methods. Two distinct mitochondrial haplotypes (16,569 bp for haplotype I and 16,646 bp for haplotype II) were observed, differing by 18.83% in nucleotide sequence. Phylogenetic analysis suggests divergence between these haplotypes and potential interspecific hybridization with M. anguillicaudatus, leading to paternal leakage. In natural populations of P. dabryanus along the Yangtze River, both haplotypes are present, with Type I being dominant (75% copy number). Expression analysis shows that Type I has higher expression levels of ND3 and ND6 genes compared to Type II, suggesting Type I’s primary role. This discovery of a species with two mitochondrial types provides a model for studying paternal leakage heterogeneity and insights into mitochondrial genome evolution and inheritance.

1. Introduction

Mitochondria are important organelles in eukaryotes that provide energy for cellular processes [1]. The mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is the extranuclear genetic material independent of the replication control of nuclear DNA. According to the prevailing consensus, mitochondria originated from α-proteobacteria. Most of the genes in the ancestral bacterial genome during evolution were lost or transferred to the nucleus, leaving only the compact mtDNA molecule [2]. Thus, in sexual reproduction, mitochondria and mtDNA are normally inherited exclusively from the mother (maternally inherited) [3], enabling genealogical researchers to trace maternal lineage far back in time. Combining with its small size (generally 15–20 kb), high copy number, and higher mutation rate (compared to nuclear genes), mtDNA has thus been transformed as a crucial molecular tool widely used in early species identification (i.e., DNA barcoding) and phylogenetic reconstruction studies [4,5].
Mitochondrial heteroplasmy, i.e., the occurrence of more than one mitochondrial haplotype, has been demonstrated in a broad range of species, both vertebrates and invertebrates [6,7,8]. Mitochondrial heteroplasmy can be generated by somatic mutations within an individual or heteroplasmy of the oocytes [7,9], including length or site variation, i.e., the presence of different mtDNA lengths or different nucleotide orders, respectively, in the same cell. While site heteroplasmy is rare, length heteroplasmy, the occurrence of different size variants due to variable numbers of tandem repeats in the noncoding control region [10,11], is frequent in natural populations. Such length variation is thought to have arisen through slipped strand mispairing during replication [12].
In addition, heteroplasmy can also be generated by paternal leakage of mtDNA, where paternal mitochondrial DNA is not always eliminated during egg fertilization [13]. Male mitochondrial DNA inheritance has been discovered in Plymouth Rock chickens [14]. There is also evidence suggesting rare instances of male mitochondrial inheritance in certain mammalian species. Specifically, there are documented occurrences in mice [15], although the mitochondria inherited from the male were ultimately rejected. This phenomenon has also been observed in sheep [16] and, in rare cases, humans [17,18]. Doubly uniparental inheritance of mtDNA is observed in bivalve mollusks. In those species, females have only one type of mtDNA (F), whereas males have F-type mtDNA in their somatic cells but M-type mtDNA (which can be as much as 30% divergent) in germline cells [19]. Paternally inherited mitochondria have additionally been reported in some insects, such as fruit flies [20], honeybees [21], and periodical cicadas [22]. Moreover, paternal leakage has so far been well-documented within hybrid zones of intersecting species or populations in sea turtles [23], birds [24], and insects [25]. Currently, paternal inheritance of mtDNA has not been reported in natural fish populations except in artificially hybridized species under laboratory conditions [26,27].
Large-scale loach, P. dabryanus (Cobitidae, Cypriniformes), is a small freshwater teleost that inhabits the muddy bottom of creeks, ponds, wetlands, and paddy fields. Through high-throughput sequencing, phylogenetic analysis, and field investigation of natural populations, we showed evidence of paternal mtDNA leakage in natural populations of large-scale loach, P. dabryanus, by sequencing the entire mitochondrial genomes. We found two distinct mitochondria coexist in one individual. By reconstructing the phylogenetic relationship of the Cobitoidea fishes, we found that these two mitochondrial haplotypes belong to separate, divergent species groups. The one haplotype (Type I) considered as the type itself of P. dabryanus clusters with Misgurnus nikolskyi and Misgurnus mohoity, while the other (type II) clusters closely with M. anguillicaudatus. Interestingly, this phenomenon of dual mitochondrial inheritance is prevalent in the natural population of this species with higher copies of type I. These results indicate the occurrence of interspecific hybridization and paternal mtDNA leakage between M. anguillicaudatus and P. dabryanus in nature and the retention of dual mtDNA in the offspring.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Animals

Healthy P. dabryanus were collected from various populations in the upper, middle, and lower reaches of the Yangtze River basin, China, including Erhai (ER,14 individuals, 21.0–33.3 g), Dongting Lake (DT, 15 individuals, 22.5–35.5 g), Honghu Lake (HH, 15 individuals, 18.0–31.0 g), Liangzi Lake (LZ, 17 individuals, 20.2–32.1 g), and Taihu Lake (TH, 20 individuals, 19.6–28.4 g). Loach species was identified according to Chen and Zhu [28].

2.2. RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

The total RNA from various tissues of healthy P. dabryanus was extracted using the TRIZol reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentrations of the total RNA were carried out by NanoDropND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA), and the integrity of tissue RNA was determined by agarose gel. After MS-222 anesthetized the fish, blood was drawn from the tail vein, and the tissues, including the brain, heart, fin, kidney, spleen, gut, gill, and skin, were collected. Genomic DNA was extracted using the standard phenol-chloroform method.

2.3. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Amplification and Sequencing

The mitogenomes of P. dabryanus were amplified using the long PCR method. Two fish-versatile primers (S-LA-16S-L+S-LA-16S-H) [29] were used to amplify the entire mitochondrial genome in a single reaction. The reaction was performed with 25 µL reaction volume containing 10 × LA PCR buffer II (Mg2+), 1.25 mM of dNTPs, 0.5 mM of each primer, 1.25 µL LA Taq polymerase (Takara, Beijing, China), and approximately 100 ng template DNA. The thermal cycle profile was pre-denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, followed by 30 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 68 °C for 16 min, and finally with 72 °C for 10 min. To further validate the sequence obtained above, two sets of other fish-versatile primers (S-LA-16S-L+H15149-CYB and L12321-Leu+S-LA-16S-H) were used to amplify the mitogenome of the same fish in two fragments of ~12 and ~7 kb. Unfortunately, a high level of nucleotide divergences was observed in the overlapping region of the two segments, making it impossible to reach the full target genome sequence. The sequence amplified using S-LA-16S-L+H15149-CYB was the same as a corresponding region with S-LA-16S-L+S-LA-16S-H (16S to Leu). However, the sequence amplified using L12321-Leu+S-LA-16S-H exhibited extensive divergence with the corresponding region (16S to Cytb) of S-LA-16S-L+S-LA-16S-H. Therefore, new primer pairs (P3F+P5R, 3.5 kb; P5F+P7R, 2.5 kb; P7F+P9R, 3 kb; P9F+P13-L, 5.5 kb) were designed to amplify the region of L12321-Leu+S-LA-16S-H, and the PCR conditions were the same as previously described. For distinguishing, this haplotype was designated as Type II, while the former was Type I. To determine whether the observed cases were random events, 30 fish from the same area were selected randomly for further examination.
The long PCR products were sequenced using a primer walking strategy with primer pairsP1-P18. These primers were designed based on sequence alignment of 26 mtDNA sequences of Cobitoidea species, retrieved from GeneBank (Table 1).
The standard PCR reaction was performed with a 10 µL reaction volume containing 7.7 μL of ddH2O, 0.1 µL of Taq polymerase (Takara), 1 µL of Taq buffer, 0.2 µL of dNTPs, 0.25 µL of each primer, and 0.5 µL of DNA template. Gradient PCR is performed, followed by agarose gel electrophoresis of the amplification products. Bands are visualized on a gel imaging system to determine the optimal annealing temperature for each primer design, with a clear and bright band indicating the best condition. The thermal cycle profile was pre-denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min, followed by 32 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 55–65 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 40 s, and finally with 72 °C for 5 min. The sequencing was conducted by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China) Co., Ltd.
For quantitative PCR (qPCR), amplification was performed with the specific primer pair targeting fin’s mitochondrial DNA ND3 and ND6 gene in a 10 µL reaction mix, which contained 5 µL of Hieff qPCR SYBR Green Master Mixv (No Rox) and 0.15 µL of each primer, DNA 2 µL, and PCR-grade water 2.7 µL. The reactions were carried out following the procedure: 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 41 cycles of 95 °C for 1 s, 55 °C for 10 s, and then 72 °C for 6 min. Table 2 lists the primer pairs used in this experiment. Mitochondrial DNA copies were calculated according to the standard curve, which was constructed based on a series of diluted plasmids containing the ND3 and ND6 genes and were expressed with copies per µL DNA (copies/µL DNA).

2.4. Gene Annotation and Sequence Analysis

The sequence fragments obtained were edited in the Seqmen program (DNAstar, Madison, WI, USA) for contig assembly to obtain the complete mitogenome sequences. DOGMA software was used to annotate protein-coding and ribosomal RNA genes and define their respective gene boundaries [30]. The tRNAs and their secondary structures were identified by tRNAscan-SE 1.21 software [31]. The putative origin of light strand replication (OriL), control region (CR), and conserved motifs were identified via sequence homology. Sequences were aligned using the Clustal W [32]. The numbers of polymorphic sites, nucleotide, and amino acid divergence between the two haplotypes were estimated with DnaSP v5.0 [33].
For the construction of the mitochondrial gene map of P. dabryanus, we employed the following processes: genes encoded on the heavy or light strands are shown outside or inside the circular gene map, respectively. The inner ring represents the GC content. Both mtDNA types of P. dabryanus possess a uniform gene arrangement and similar gene sizes. The figure was initially generated with pDRAW32 and subsequently modified manually.

2.5. Phylogenetic Analyses

To understand the genetic relatedness of these two haplotypes, the complete mitochondrial genome sequences of the two haplotypes in this study, together with previously reported mitogenome sequences of 26 Cobitoidea species as well as Danio rerio and Cyprinus carpio (outgroup) available from GenBank were used to perform phylogenetic analysis. The trees were constructed using the maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) methods, using MEGA version 5.0 and MrBayes 3.1.2 [34], respectively.
The jModelTest program [35] was used to determine the best-fitting models of nucleotide substitution. The Akanke’s Information Criterion (AIC) indicated that the GTR+I+G model is the most appropriate for each dataset. The following settings were applied in the BI analyses: the number of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) generations = three million, sampling frequency = 1000, and burn-in = 250. The robustness of the resultant ML tree was evaluated using bootstrap probabilities calculated from nonparametric bootstrap analyses with 500 pseudo-replications.
The COX2 genes of P. dabryanus from Erhai (EH), Dongting Lake (DT), Liangzi Lake (LZ), and Honghu Lake (HH) were obtained and sequenced to understand the phylogeny of mtDNA haplotypes. The phylogenetic tree of the COX2 gene of P. dabryanus was constructed using the Neighbor-joining (N-J) method in the MEGA 6.0 software.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

An unpaired Student’s t-test (Prism version 6.01; GraphPad) was used for the analysis of differences between mitochondrial DNA haplotype I and haplotype II copy numbers in the same tissue. p-values of 0.05 or less were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Mitogenome Organization and Composition

Two distinct mitochondrial haplotypes were sequenced from one P. dabryanus fish. The two mtDNAs exhibit typical vertebrate mitochondrial genomes with identical gene content and gene arrangement. They comprise a heavy chain (H-chain) and a light chain (L-chain); both of them share an identical gene composition and encode 37 genes in total, including 13 protein-coding genes, 22 tRNA genes, 2 rRNA (12S rRNA and 16S rRNA), and two major non-coding regions—the control region and the origin of light-strand replication (OriL). Except for the ND6 gene and eight tRNA genes (tRNAGln, tRNAAla, tRNAAsn, tRNACys, tRNATyr, tRNASer, tRNAGlu, and tRNAPro), the remaining 28 genes are all located on the heavy chain (Figure 1). However, the lengths of the complete genome were 16,569 bp and 16,646 bp for Type I and Type II, respectively; the Type II genome is 73 nucleotides longer than Type I. The most prominent difference is the presence of a 71-bp insertion consisting of the last 44 bp of COX2 and 27 bp of intergenic spacer following the COX2 gene, which was not found in Type I. After examining 30 samples, each product used was amplified using primer N7F+N9L primer as a template and then amplified using primer N8F+N8L primer; all can identify the presence of this segment.
Furthermore, the arrangement order, gene length, and the use of start and stop codons of all genes are highly similar. Apart from the control region, there are only 12 non-coding intergenic spacers, ranging from 1 to 27 bp in length. The largest intergenic spacer is 27 bp, located between the Type II tRNALys and 12S rRNA gene. Additionally, some adjacent genes overlap with the overlap length ranging from 1 to 10 bp. The longest overlap, 10 bp, occurs between the ATPase8 and ATPase6 genes. The total length of the 13 protein-coding genes in the mitochondrial genome of P. dabryanus ranges from 11,433 to 11,472 bp. Except for the COX1 gene, which starts with GTG as its start codon, the remaining 12 protein-coding genes initiate with ATG as their start codon. In Type I, the COX2, COX3, and Cytb protein-coding genes terminate with T, while the remaining 10 genes possess the typical complete stop codon TAA. In Type II, apart from the ND2, COX3, ND3, and Cytb genes that terminate with T and the ND4 gene that terminates with TA, the other eight protein-coding genes exhibit the typical complete stop codons TAA or TAG (Table 3).
Besides the large insertion leading to obviously longer in Type II, the two haplotype sequences exhibit high sequence divergences in all genes/regions, highest in the intergenic spacer (28.13%) and lowest in the tRNAs (3.85%); the overall nucleotide and amino acid divergence were 13.38% and 5.54%, respectively (Figure 2).

3.2. Phylogenetic Relationships

The ML and BI phylogenetic trees of complete mtDNA from the present two haplotypes and 28 Cobitoidea species were reconstructed and exhibited similar phylogenetic topologies (Figure 3). As expected, the species from Cobitinae, Balitornate, Nemacheilinae, and Botiinae were monophyletic and formed one clade, respectively, which is consistent with the phylogenetic studies based on the morphological data [36] and molecular biology [37]. However, the two mitochondria haplotypes of P. dabryanus fell into two divergent phylogenetic groups. Type I was clustered with M. nikolskyi and M. mohoity and then with the genus Koreocobitis. Contrarily, Type II was clustered with five-level ploidy M. anguillicaudatus, especially for tetraploids, which our laboratory sequenced, and then clustered with the genus Cobitis with high bootstrap supports (Bootstrap value = 100, BP = 1).

3.3. Investigation of Mitochondrial Heterogeneity in P. dabryanus from Different Regions

This study conducted an investigation into the natural populations of P. dabryanus in the Yangtze River System, the largest river system in China, to gain insights into the distribution and occurrence frequency of the two types of mitochondria in natural populations. Sampling sites covered various regions in the upper, middle, and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. A total of 81 samples were collected from 5 sampling sites, with the largest number, 20, from Taihu Lake (TH) and the smallest number, 12, from Liangzi Lake (LZ). Regions with significant differences in the COX2 gene between two haplotypic mitochondria were amplified utilizing previously screened stable primers. The detection results indicated that wild populations located in Erhai (EH) upstream, Liangzi Lake (LZ) midstream, Taihu Lake (TH) downstream, and two lakes connected to the main and tributary streams all contained two haplotypes. In simpler terms, despite significant habitat differences, natural populations in different regions are composed of fish with two haplotypes of mitochondria (Figure 4).
Phylogenetic analyses based on the COX2 gene revealed that natural populations in different regions are composed of fish with two haplotypes of mitochondria (Figure 5).

3.4. Tissue Distribution and Expression Analysis of Two Mitochondrial DNA Haplotypes

ND3 and ND6 proteins are crucial for the assembly and function of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHO) complex I (C I) of the mitochondrial electron transport chain that produces adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which is essential for life. Variants in ND3 and ND6 genes can cause severe functional defects in mitochondria. In this study, the mitochondrial DNA copy number was determined through the ND3 and ND6 genes. Overall, regardless of the mitochondrial copy number determined by the mitochondrial ND3 or ND6 gene, both Type I and Type II distributions were observed in 9 tissues, with the copy number of Type I being significantly (p < 0.001) higher than that of Type II. The contents of Type I and Type II in blood and spleen tissues were lower than those in other tissues, and the mitochondrial DNA copy numbers of both types were the lowest in the spleen. In the same tissue, the proportion of Type I copy number was as high as approximately 75% (Figure 6).
As shown in Figure 6, both mitochondrial DNA haplotypes are distributed in all tested tissues. This study conducted an expression analysis of mitochondrial genes ND3 and ND6 to investigate the functions of these two types of mitochondria. As illustrated in Figure 7, the ND3 and ND6 genes of Type I mitochondria are expressed in all tested tissues, with higher expression levels in heart and brain tissues compared to other tissues. The expression level in the heart is the highest, approximately more than three times that in the brain. However, no expression of ND3 and ND6 genes was detected in Type II haplotype across all tissues.

4. Discussion

Mitochondrial DNA is usually considered to comply with strict maternal inheritance, with only one mitochondrial DNA haplotype in vertebrates. Male mitochondrial DNA inheritance and doubly uniparental inheritance of mtDNA are observed in some animals. Here, we found that the phenomenon generally exists in a species of fish, paramisgurnus dabryanus, regarding the presence of two distinct complete mtDNA in one individual. We identified the complete mitochondrial genome length of P. dabryanus to be 16,569 bp (Type I) and 16,646 bp (Type II), respectively. It revealed that the gene composition and arrangement were consistent with typical vertebrate mitochondrial genomes, with Type I exhibiting a similar length to the two previously reported mitochondrial genomes of P. dabryanus [38,39]. However, Type II is reported for the first time, similar to M. anguillicaudatus. Only ATG and GTG were identified as start codons among the mitochondrial protein-coding genes of P. dabryanus, a phenomenon commonly observed in the mitochondrial DNA of other animals [40,41,42]. Among the 13 protein-coding genes in P. dabryanus, six genes terminated with complete stop codons (TAA and TAG), while the remaining genes terminated with T or TA. Incomplete stop codons may form complete stop codons through polyadenylation during mRNA processing [43]. The overall nucleotide and amino acid differences in the two haplotype sequences are beyond the range expected for conspecific mtDNA. Sequence divergence usually averages 1 to 3% within species, even though some can be as high as 10% [44]. For example, the overall mean divergence of four human mitochondrial genomes (Cambridge Reference Sequence [NC_001807], a Swedish [X93334], an African [D381112], and a Japanese [AB055387]) is 0.5%; the mean divergence for the 26 complete genomes of Drosophila simulans [45] is 1.6% [46]. Thus, the high levels of divergence at the interspecific level between the two haplotypes indicate that the heteroplasmy observed in these specimens is more likely due to leakage of paternal mitochondrial DNA rather than base substitutions or slipped strand mispairing, which mainly occurred in the noncoding control region.
Previous researchers showed that paternal leakage is often associated with hybrid zones [47], where the reproduction barriers between hybridizing species or populations may not be efficient at preventing paternal mtDNA inheritance [6]. Additionally, fertilization experiments in fruit flies and cattle showed that survival of paternal mitochondria might be higher in interspecific crosses than within-species mating because molecular recognition systems may be relaxed in such crosses [48,49]. P. dabryanus and Misgurnus anguillicaudatus are found sympatrically in most areas in China with similar morphological characters and nearly overlapping spawning seasons (March to October) [50]. Hybridization between P. dabryanus and M. anguillicaudatus has been identified at relatively high frequencies in wild populations [50]. Although P. dabryanus × M. anguillicaudatus hybrids may display reduced fecundity, leakage of mtDNA would be possible if the hybrids between P. dabryanus and M. anguillicaudatus were fertile because the F1 hybrids might backcross to their parental generation as shown in other loaches [51,52]. Thus, it seems reasonable to assume that the P. dabryanus fish employed in the present study resulted from interspecific hybridization between P. dabryanus and M. anguillicaudatus, and the heteroplasmy observed in these specimens is probably due to leakage of paternal mtDNA resulting from interspecific hybridization.
The Yangtze River is the first largest river in China and originate from the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Its mainstream and tributary flow through 11 provincial-level administrative units from west to east. The diverse climatic types, complex topographic features, and unique hydrological and aquatic environments of the Yangtze River have contributed to a rich variety of habitats. Assessing the evolutionary significance of paternal inheritance also necessitates understanding its frequency and consequences in natural populations [53]. Field population surveys have revealed that the wild populations throughout the Yangtze River basin are both of the dual-mitochondrial type. Increasing evidence suggests that paternal inheritance of mtDNA exists in various species, including mice [15], fish [26], ticks [54], and nematodes [6], but this phenomenon is typically observed only in laboratory or controlled settings. Consequently, the frequency of this phenomenon might have been underestimated, especially in natural populations. In contrast, this study investigated the natural populations of P. dabryanus in different basins of the Yangtze River system in China. All fish collected from representative upstream, midstream, and downstream regions possessed two mitochondrial types, indicating a 100% frequency of paternal leakage. It is acknowledged that as the sampling scope expands and the sample size increases, the observed frequency may decrease. Nevertheless, as previously mentioned, the frequency of paternal leakage could still be underestimated. This finding suggests that dual-mitochondrial populations occupy a relatively high frequency in wild populations and can be inherited stably.
Many copies of mtDNA are in one cell. In the homoplasmic state, a cell or a tissue has mtDNA of only one genotype, whereas, in a heteroplasmic state, there is not just one genotype [2]. In this study, we investigated the wild populations of P. dabryanus in 5 representative regions of the Yangtze River, encompassing a total of 81 fish, all of which contained two distinct mitochondrial types. To delve deeper into the distribution pattern of these two mitochondrial types within fish, we conducted qPCR analysis on wild populations of P. dabryanus collected at Liangzi Lake (LZ). The results revealed that, across all tissues sampled, except for the gonads, the copy number of mitochondrial Type I was significantly higher than that of Type II, with the highest ratio of copy numbers between the two types approximating 3:1. Regarding a single mitochondrial type, tissues other than blood and spleen exhibited higher copy numbers. Organs with high energy requirements, such as the heart and brain, have been proven to harbor high mtDNA copy numbers, whereas tissues like the spleen, which rely on an alternative metabolic pathway—glycolysis—tend to possess fewer mtDNA copies [55]. Notably, despite the presence of both mitochondrial DNA types in all fish, the Type II mitochondrial genes remained unexpressed. The regulation of mtDNA expression is highly complex, involving multiple layers of control. Apart from its own genes and regulatory elements, mitochondria rely on various nuclear genome products to fulfill important functions such as replication, transcription, and translation [2]. The big-scale loach (P. dabryanus) belongs to the Cypriniformes, Cobitidae, and Paramisgurnus genera and is known for its high survival rate, strong disease resistance, and rapid growth rate [56]. However, whether the emergence and stable inheritance of the two types of mitochondria are related to the strong adaptability of P. dabryanus remains to be further explored. Meanwhile, the mechanisms and significance of paternal leakage of animal mitochondrial DNA and the relationship between evolution and function deserve more attention.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the sequencing and phylogenetic analyses using the complete mtDNA sequences revealed two distinct mitochondrial haplotypes in one P. dabryanus fish. The two mtDNA sequences exhibit similar gene content and gene arrangement despite the fact that their primary DNA sequence has diverged by 13.376%. More importantly, phylogenetic analysis of the Cobitoidea indicated interspecific hybridization between P. dabryanus and M. anguillicaudatus in natural populations, and subsequently, mitochondrial DNA leakage occurred in their offspring. We investigated the natural populations across various regions of the Yangtze River and found that, despite significant habitat differences, these populations in the disparate regions are consistently composed of fish possessing two distinct haplotypes of mitochondria. Through this research, we have obtained detailed information about the complete sequence of the mitochondrial DNA genome of P. dabryanus and discovered possible clues for its paternal mitochondrial inheritance, which lays a foundation for further exploring the relationship between the structural heterogeneity and function of the mitochondria. In all, our findings provide a fish model for studying the heterogeneity of paternal leakage mitochondria and also offer valuable insights into the evolution and inheritance of mitochondrial genomes.

Author Contributions

Z.Q.: writing—original draft, visualization, and validation. J.S.: data curation, formal analysis, and investigation. Y.Y. (Yue Yu): methodology, investigation, and validation. G.Y.: investigation and validation. X.Z.: methodology, writing—review, and editing. Y.Y. (Yongyao Yu): funding acquisition, writing—review, editing, and supervision. Z.Q., J.S. and Y.Y. contributed equally to this work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32102831) to Y.Y. (Yongyao Yu).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All experimental protocols were performed in accordance with the guidelines and regulations established in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China. The protocols were approved by the Scientific Committee of Huazhong Agricultural University (permit number HZAUFI-2018-026).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for comments that help us to improve the quality of our paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ma, X.; Niu, M.; Ni, H.M.; Ding, W.X. Mitochondrial dynamics, quality control, and mtDNA in alcohol-associated liver disease and liver cancer. Hepatology 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gustafsson, C.M.; Falkenberg, M.; Larsson, N.-G. Maintenance and Expression of Mammalian Mitochondrial DNA. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2016, 85, 133–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bi, C.; Wang, L.; Fan, Y.; Yuan, B.; Alsolami, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, P.Y.; Huang, Y.; Yu, Y.; Izpisua Belmonte, J.C.; et al. Quantitative haplotype-resolved analysis of mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy in Human single oocytes, blastoids, and pluripotent stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, 3793–3805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Catanese, G.; Infante, C.; Manchado, M. Complete mitochondrial DNA sequences of the frigate tuna Auxis thazard and the bullet tuna Auxis rochei. DNA Seq. J. DNA Seq. Mapp. 2008, 19, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yue, G.H.; Liew, W.C.; Orban, L. The complete mitochondrial genome of a basal teleost, the Asian arowana (Scleropages formosus, Osteoglossidae). BMC Genom. 2006, 7, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hoolahan, A.H.; Blok, V.C.; Gibson, T.; Dowton, M. Paternal leakage of mitochondrial DNA in experimental crosses of populations of the potato cyst nematode Globodera pallida. Genetica 2011, 139, 1509–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Stewart, J.B.; Chinnery, P.F. Extreme heterogeneity of human mitochondrial DNA from organelles to populations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2021, 22, 106–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lee, J.; Willett, C.S.; Lopez, J. Frequent Paternal Mitochondrial Inheritance and Rapid Haplotype Frequency Shifts in Copepod Hybrids. J. Hered. 2022, 113, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Stewart, J.B.; Chinnery, P.F. The dynamics of mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy: Implications for human health and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2015, 16, 530–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lunt, D.H.; Whipple, L.E.; Hyman, B.C. Mitochondrial DNA variable number tandem repeats (VNTRs): Utility and problems in molecular ecology. Mol. Ecol. 1998, 7, 1441–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Moum, T.; Bakke, I. Mitochondrial control region structure and single site heteroplasmy in the razorbill (Alca torda; Aves). Curr. Genet. 2001, 39, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Densmore, L.D.; Wright, J.W.; Brown, W.M. Length variation and heteroplasmy are frequent in mitochondrial DNA from parthenogenetic and bisexual lizards (genus Cnemidophorus). Genetics 1985, 110, 689–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kvist, L.; Martens, J.; Nazarenko, A.A.; Orell, M. Paternal leakage of mitochondrial DNA in the great tit (Parus major). Mol. Biol. Evol. 2003, 20, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Alexander, M.; Ho, S.Y.; Molak, M.; Barnett, R.; Carlborg, Ö.; Dorshorst, B.; Honaker, C.; Besnier, F.; Wahlberg, P.; Dobney, K.; et al. Mitogenomic analysis of a 50-generation chicken pedigree reveals a rapid rate of mitochondrial evolution and evidence for paternal mtDNA inheritance. Biol. Lett. 2015, 11, 20150561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gyllensten, U.; Wharton, D.; Josefsson, A.; Wilson, A.C. Paternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA in mice. Nature 1991, 352, 255–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhao, X.; Li, N.; Guo, W.; Hu, X.; Liu, Z.; Gong, G.; Wang, A.; Feng, J.; Wu, C. Further evidence for paternal inheritance of mitochondrial DNA in the sheep (Ovis aries). Heredity 2004, 93, 399–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Luo, S.; Valencia, C.A.; Zhang, J.; Lee, N.C.; Slone, J.; Gui, B.; Wang, X.; Li, Z.; Dell, S.; Brown, J.; et al. Biparental Inheritance of Mitochondrial DNA in Humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 13039–13044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Singh, A.N. A105 family decoded: Discovery of genome-wide fingerprints for personalized genomic medicine. In Proceedings of the International Congress on Up Close & Personalized, Florence, Italy, 2–5 February 2012. [Google Scholar]
  19. Passamonti, M.; Ghiselli, F. Doubly uniparental inheritance: Two mitochondrial genomes, one precious model for organelle DNA inheritance and evolution. DNA Cell Biol. 2009, 28, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wolff, J.N.; Nafisinia, M.; Sutovsky, P.; Ballard, J.W. Paternal transmission of mitochondrial DNA as an integral part of mitochondrial inheritance in metapopulations of Drosophila simulans. Heredity 2013, 110, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Meusel, M.S.; Moritz, R.F. Transfer of paternal mitochondrial DNA during fertilization of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) eggs. Curr. Genet. 1993, 24, 539–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fontaine, K.M.; Cooley, J.R.; Simon, C. Evidence for paternal leakage in hybrid periodical cicadas (Hemiptera: Magicicada spp.). PLoS ONE 2007, 2, e892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Vilaça, S.T.; Maroso, F.; Lara, P.; de Thoisy, B.; Chevallier, D.; Arantes, L.S.; Santos, F.R.; Bertorelle, G.; Mazzoni, C.J. Evidence of backcross inviability and mitochondrial DNA paternal leakage in sea turtle hybrids. Mol. Ecol. 2023, 32, 628–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gandolfi, A.; Crestanello, B.; Fagotti, A.; Simoncelli, F.; Chiesa, S.; Girardi, M.; Giovagnoli, E.; Marangoni, C.; Di Rosa, I.; Lucentini, L. New Evidences of Mitochondrial DNA Heteroplasmy by Putative Paternal Leakage between the Rock Partridge (Alectoris graeca) and the Chukar Partridge (Alectoris chukar). PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Polovina, E.S.; Parakatselaki, M.E.; Ladoukakis, E.D. Paternal leakage of mitochondrial DNA and maternal inheritance of heteroplasmy in Drosophila hybrids. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, Y.; Sun, W.; Gu, Q.; Yao, J.; Tan, H.; Huang, X.; Qin, Q.; Tao, M.; Zhang, C.; Liu, S. Variations in the Mitochondrial Genome of a Goldfish-Like Hybrid [Koi Carp (♀) × Blunt Snout Bream (♂)] Indicate Paternal Leakage. Front. Genet. 2021, 11, 613520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wang, S.; Jiao, N.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, M.; Zhou, P.; Huang, X.; Hu, F.; Yang, C.; Shu, Y.; Li, W.; et al. Evidence for the paternal mitochondrial DNA in the crucian carp-like fish lineage with hybrid origin. Sci. China Life Sci. 2020, 63, 102–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Chen, J.Z.S. The subfamily classification of the Cobitidae fishes and their phylogenetic relationships. Acta Zootaxon. Sin. 1984, 9, 201–207. [Google Scholar]
  29. Miya, M.; Nishida, M. Use of mitogenomic information in teleostean molecular phylogenetics: A tree-based exploration under the maximum-parsimony optimality criterion. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2000, 17, 437–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wyman, S.K.; Jansen, R.K.; Boore, J.L. Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, 3252–3255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lowe, T.M.; Eddy, S.R. tRNAscan-SE: A program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Thompson, J.D.; Higgins, D.G.; Gibson, T.J. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 4673–4680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Librado, P.; Rozas, J. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1451–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Huelsenbeck, J.P.; Ronquist, F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 2001, 17, 754–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Posada, D. jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008, 25, 1253–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nalbant, T.T.; Bianco, P.G. The loaches of Iran and adjacent regions with description of six new species (Cobitoidea). Ital. J. Zool. 1998, 65, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tang, Q.; Liu, H.; Mayden, R.; Xiong, B. Comparison of evolutionary rates in the mitochondrial DNA cytochrome b gene and control region and their implications for phylogeny of the Cobitoidea (Teleostei: Cypriniformes). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2006, 39, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wang, Y.; Wang, W.; Song, W.; Huang, S.; Cao, X. The complete mitochondrial genome of natural Paramisgurnus dabryanus (Cypriniformes: Cobitidae). Mitochondrial DNA 2015, 26, 937–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dai, L.; Guo, B.; Chu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Huang, T. Complete mitochondrial genome of Paramisgurnus dabryanus. Mitochondrial DNA Part A DNA Mapp. Seq. Anal. 2016, 27, 1257–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Zhang, H.; Shen, K.; Feng, S.; Wang, C.; Xu, S. The complete mitochondrial genome of Platycephalus sp.1 (Teleostei, Platycephalidae) obtained by whole genome sequencing. Mitochondrial DNA. Part B Resour. 2021, 6, 1941–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bi, S.; Song, Y.; Liu, L.; Wan, J.; Zhou, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Liu, J. Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Piophila casei (Diptera: Piophilidae): Genome Description and Phylogenetic Implications. Genes 2023, 14, 883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kim, J.; Jeong, J.; Lee, S.; Nguyen, P.T.; Han, D.W.; Hettiarachchi, S.A.; Jo, E.; Kang, S.; Kim, I.C.; Kim, J.H. The complete mitochondrial genome of Gobionotothen gibberifrons (Perciformes, Nototheniidae). Mitochondrial DNA. Part B Resour. 2024, 9, 398–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Moritz, C.; Dowling, T.E.; Brown, W.M. Evolution of Animal Mitochondrial DNA: Relevance for Population Biology and Systematics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1987, 18, 269–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hoeh, W.R.; Blakley, K.H.; Brown, W.M. Heteroplasmy suggests limited biparental inheritance of Mytilus mitochondrial DNA. Science 1991, 251, 1488–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ballard, J.W. Sequential evolution of a symbiont inferred from the host: Wolbachia and Drosophila simulans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2004, 21, 428–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mizi, A.; Zouros, E.; Moschonas, N.; Rodakis, G.C. The complete maternal and paternal mitochondrial genomes of the Mediterranean mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis: Implications for the doubly uniparental inheritance mode of mtDNA. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2005, 22, 952–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Saville, B.J.; Kohli, Y.; Anderson, J.B. mtDNA recombination in a natural population. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 1331–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Sutovsky, P.; Moreno, R.D.; Ramalho-Santos, J.; Dominko, T.; Simerly, C.; Schatten, G. Ubiquitinated sperm mitochondria, selective proteolysis, and the regulation of mitochondrial inheritance in mammalian embryos. Biol. Reprod. 2000, 63, 582–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sherengul, W.; Kondo, R.; Matsuura, E.T. Analysis of paternal transmission of mitochondrial DNA in Drosophila. Genes Genet. Syst. 2006, 81, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. You, C.; Yu, X.; Tong, J. Detection of hybridization between two loach species (Paramisgurnus dabryanus and Misgurnus anguillicaudatus) in wild populations. Environ. Biol. Fishes 2009, 86, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kim, D.S.; Nam, Y.K.; Park, I.-S. Survival and karyological analysis of reciprocal diploid and triploid hybrids between mud loach (Misgurnus mizolepis) and pond loach (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus). Aquaculture 1995, 135, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nam, Y.K.; Park, I.-S.; Kim, D.S. Triploid hybridization of fast-growing transgenic mud loach Misgurnus mizolepis male to cyprinid loach Misgurnus anguillicaudatus female: The first performance study on growth and reproduction of transgenic polyploid hybrid fish. Aquaculture 2004, 231, 559–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wallace, D.C.; Chalkia, D. Mitochondrial DNA Genetics and the Heteroplasmy Conundrum in Evolution and Disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013, 5, a021220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Mastrantonio, V.; Latrofa, M.S.; Porretta, D.; Lia, R.P.; Parisi, A.; Iatta, R.; Dantas-Torres, F.; Otranto, D.; Urbanelli, S. Paternal leakage and mtDNA heteroplasmy in Rhipicephalus spp. ticks. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Li, B.; Kalinowski, P.; Kim, B.; Pauls, A.D.; Poburko, D. Emerging methods for and novel insights gained by absolute quantification of mitochondrial DNA copy number and its clinical applications. Pharmacol. Ther. 2022, 232, 107995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, Z.-R.; Li, S.-Y.; Zhang, Y.-Z.; Li, Y.-A.; Huo, H.-H.; Yu, C.-Q.; Zhou, Q.-B. Metabolomic and transcriptomic profiling reveals the effect of dietary protein and lipid levels on growth performance in loach (Paramisgurnus dabryanus). Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1236812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Gene map of P. dabryanus mitochondrial genome.
Figure 1. Gene map of P. dabryanus mitochondrial genome.
Biology 13 00604 g001
Figure 2. The nucleotide and amino acid divergence between the two mtDNA haplotypes were sequenced from one P. dabryanus fish. Note: The blue bars represent the nucleotide divergence; the red bars represent amino acid divergence.
Figure 2. The nucleotide and amino acid divergence between the two mtDNA haplotypes were sequenced from one P. dabryanus fish. Note: The blue bars represent the nucleotide divergence; the red bars represent amino acid divergence.
Biology 13 00604 g002
Figure 3. Phylogenetic analyses of the two mtDNA haplotypes sequenced from one P. dabryanus fish and the other 28 Cobitoidea species. Note: The phylogenetic analyses were conducted based on the complete mtDNA sequences with maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) methods. Numbers on the nodes represent support values inferred from ML (left) bootstrap and BI (right) probability analyses, respectively. * Represents the two mitochondrial haplotypes detected in this study.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic analyses of the two mtDNA haplotypes sequenced from one P. dabryanus fish and the other 28 Cobitoidea species. Note: The phylogenetic analyses were conducted based on the complete mtDNA sequences with maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) methods. Numbers on the nodes represent support values inferred from ML (left) bootstrap and BI (right) probability analyses, respectively. * Represents the two mitochondrial haplotypes detected in this study.
Biology 13 00604 g003
Figure 4. Investigation on mitochondrial heterogeneity of wild populations of P. dabryanus. Note: 1 represents Erhai (EH); 2 represents Dongting Lake (DT); 3 represents Honghu Lake (HH); 4 represents Liangzi Lake (LZ); 5 represents Taihu Lake (TH); Type I/Type II signifies the presence of two distinct mitochondrial haplotypes within a single fish.
Figure 4. Investigation on mitochondrial heterogeneity of wild populations of P. dabryanus. Note: 1 represents Erhai (EH); 2 represents Dongting Lake (DT); 3 represents Honghu Lake (HH); 4 represents Liangzi Lake (LZ); 5 represents Taihu Lake (TH); Type I/Type II signifies the presence of two distinct mitochondrial haplotypes within a single fish.
Biology 13 00604 g004
Figure 5. Phylogenetic analyses of the two mtDNA haplotypes sequenced from different regions. Note: The blue part represents Type I, and the red part represents Type II.
Figure 5. Phylogenetic analyses of the two mtDNA haplotypes sequenced from different regions. Note: The blue part represents Type I, and the red part represents Type II.
Biology 13 00604 g005
Figure 6. Mitochondrial DNA copy numbers and ratios in tissues. Note: (a) The copy number of ND3 gene (n = 10); (b) The ND3 copy numbers ration between Type I and Type II; (c) The copy number of ND6 gene (n = 6); (d) The ND6 copy numbers ration between Type I and Type II. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. Data are representative of three independent experiments (mean ± SEM).
Figure 6. Mitochondrial DNA copy numbers and ratios in tissues. Note: (a) The copy number of ND3 gene (n = 10); (b) The ND3 copy numbers ration between Type I and Type II; (c) The copy number of ND6 gene (n = 6); (d) The ND6 copy numbers ration between Type I and Type II. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. Data are representative of three independent experiments (mean ± SEM).
Biology 13 00604 g006
Figure 7. The relative expression of mitochondrial genes ND3 and ND6. Note: (a) The gel image of the ND3 gene; (b) The gel image of the ND6 gene; (c) The relative expression of mitochondrial gene ND3; (d) The relative expression of mitochondrial gene ND6. Note: He represents Heart; Br represents Brain; Ki represents Kidney; Sk represents Skin; Fi represents Fin; Gi represents Gill; Gu represents Spleen; Bl represents Blood.
Figure 7. The relative expression of mitochondrial genes ND3 and ND6. Note: (a) The gel image of the ND3 gene; (b) The gel image of the ND6 gene; (c) The relative expression of mitochondrial gene ND3; (d) The relative expression of mitochondrial gene ND6. Note: He represents Heart; Br represents Brain; Ki represents Kidney; Sk represents Skin; Fi represents Fin; Gi represents Gill; Gu represents Spleen; Bl represents Blood.
Biology 13 00604 g007
Table 1. PCR and sequencing primers designed for amplifying the mitochondrial genome of P. dabryanus.
Table 1. PCR and sequencing primers designed for amplifying the mitochondrial genome of P. dabryanus.
ForwardSequence (5′–3′)ReverseSequence (5′–3′)
Long PCR Primers
S-LA-16S-HTGCACCATTRGGATGTCCTGATCCAACATCS-LA-16S-LCGATTAAAGTCCTACGTGATCTGAGTTCAG
L12321-LeuGGTCTTAGGAACCAAAAACTCTTGGTGCAAH15149-CYBGGTGGCKCCTCAGAAGGACATTTGKCCTCA
P13-LCCAGCAATAATACTTCCTCAG
Internal Primers
P1FCACTGAAGATGCTAAGATGGP1RTCTCTGCCTGTTGTATGC
P2FTTACACCGAGAAGACATCCP2RCTCGTCTTGTAGGTGTATGC
P3FCAGTGACCACAAGTTCAACP3RGCATATTCAGCCAGGAAGA
P4FTCTCTAGCCTTGCCGTATAP4RGTTGATAGGATTAGACCTGTTG
P5FATAGCACAGCAGCATCACP5RGCAGTTCCAACCATTCCA
P6FAACTTAGACCAAGAGCCTTCP6RCACGAGTATCAACATCTATTCC
P7FACTGCCGTTCTTCTTCTACP7RAGCCTAAGTCCTCATAGTCA
P8FATAACCAYTCTGCCAYTTCP8RCGATTRATTAGTCAGCCTTG
P9FCGTTCCACTTGAGCACTTP9RATGGTCAGAAGAAGCAGAAT
P10FGTCTATTCATTCGTCCATTAGCP10RGCATTGTAGGAGATTGAGGTT
P11FAAGACCGTGGTTCAACTCP11RTGTGTTCGCTCGTAAGTG
P12FTGTTCACCTCTGACTACCTAP12RCATCTGCTCGTCCGTATC
P13FCATCCTGATAYATRCACTCTGACP13RCCAGCAAYAATACTTCCTCAG
P14FCTGGCATTCCTTCACATCTP14RTTCTTCAAGTCACTGGTCTC
P15FCTGCCACCACTAATCCTAAP15RGCTCACTCTAATGCCTTGT
P16FGCCACTATTCTACATCTACTCTP16RGCATAAGTCAACACCTACTG
P17FAACAAGGCATTAGAGTGAGP17RGTATGACAGCCAAGAGGT
P18FGATACCAGTAGAACATCCATP18RGCCCTCTTATCCCTAACTA
Table 2. Primers for mitochondrial heterogeneity and mitochondrial DNA copy numbers detection.
Table 2. Primers for mitochondrial heterogeneity and mitochondrial DNA copy numbers detection.
ForwardSequence (5′–3′)ReverseSequence (5′–3′)
Two Types of Mitochondrial Detection Primers
Test1-FACCCGTACTTATACTAAAACCTest1-RCGATGCCAATAGAACAGC
Test2-FCCGTACTTATACTAAAACCGTest2-RCAAGAAGATTATTAGGGAGG
Test3-FGCTAGAAATAGCAACTATGGTest3-RGGGAGGTGAGTAGTAGGG
Test4-FCGTTCCACTTGAGCACTTTest4-RATGGTCAGAAGAAGCAGAAT
Test5-FTATCGTCGCCATAGTCTCCATest5-RGTTTTAGTATAAGTACGGGTTTT
Test6-FCAACTATGGAAGAAGTTACATest6-RCAAGCAGGGTTAATAGGAAT
Test7-FTACTTTACATTATCGTCGCCTest7-RGTTTTAGTATAAGTACGGGTTTT
Test8-FTACTTTACATTATCGTCGCCTest8-RCTTCCATAGTTGCTATTTCT
Quantitative Real-Time PCR Primers
ND3-1FCCTTGGATCTGCTCGTTTND3-1RCCCTGAGCCCACTCGTAT
ND3-2FGATCTGCCCGATTACCATND3-2RCATTCATAAACCAAGCCTAA
ND6-1FTGGTTGCTGTGGCTTCTAND6-1RGCCAGAGCTGCCGAATAG
ND6-2FCTGGCCGCTGAACCATTTND6-2RCTCCTCGTAACATACTAAATTCC
The test represents primers for mitochondrial heterogeneity detection; ND3-1 represents primers for Type I mitochondrial DNA copy numbers detection; ND3-2 represents primers for Type II mitochondrial DNA copy numbers detection. The ND6 gene primers are the same.
Table 3. Characteristics of P. dabryanus Type I and Type II mitochondrial genomes.
Table 3. Characteristics of P. dabryanus Type I and Type II mitochondrial genomes.
Name of GeneLocationSize
(bp)
Start CodonStop CodonIntergenic NucleotidesStandNucleotide Divergence
IIII/III/III/III/III/III to II
tRNAPhe1–691–6969 0H0.05
12S rRNA70–102370–1022954/953 0H0.06
tRNAVal1024–10951023–109472 0H0.03
16S rRNA1096–27731095–27731678/1679 0H0.1
tRNALeu(UUR)2774–28482774–284875 1H0.01
ND12850–38242850–3824975ATGTAA7/6H0.17
tRNAIle3830–39013831–390272 −2H0.04
tRNAGln3900–39703901–397171 1L0
tRNAMet3972–40403973–404169 0H0.03
ND24041–50874042–50861047/1045ATGTAA/T--−2/0H0.17
tRNATrp5086–51555087–515670 2/1H0.08
tRNAAla5158–52265158–522669 1L0.04
tRNAAsn5228–53005228–530073 0L0.01
OriL5301–53305301–533030 0L0.1
tRNACys5331–53965331–539666 0L0.08
tRNATyr5397–54655397–546569 1L0.03
COX15467–70175467–70171551GTGTAA1H0.14
tRNASer(UCN)7019–70897019–708971 0/2L0.06
tRNAAsp7090–71617092–716372 3/13H0.07
COX27175–78657177–7911691/735ATGT--/TAA0/27H0.13
tRNALys7866–79417939–801476 1H0.03
ATPase87943–81108016–8183168ATGTAA0/−10H0.12
ATPase68101–87848174–8857684ATGTAA−1H0.15
COX38784–95678857–9640784ATGT--0H0.13
tRNAGly9568–96409641–971373 0H0.03
ND39641–99919714–10,062351/349ATGTAA/T--−1/0H0.17
tRNAArg9991–10,06010,063–10,13270 0H0.06
ND4L10,061–10,35710,133–10,429297ATGTAA−7H0.14
ND410,351–11,73310,423–11,8041383/1382ATGTAG/TA-−1/0H0.17
tRNAHis11,733–11,80111,805–11,87369 0H0
tRNASer(AGY)11,802–11,86911,874–11,94168 0/1H0.04
tRNALeu(CUN)11,871–11,94311,943–12,01573 0H0.01
ND511,944–13,78212,016–13,8541839ATGTAA/TAG−4H0.18
ND613,779–14,30013,851–14,372522ATGTAA0L0.17
tRNAGlu14,301–14,36914,373–14,44169 7/6L0
Cytb14,377–15,51714,448–15,5881141ATGT--0H0.15
tRNAThr15,518–15,58915,589–15,66072 −2H0.06
tRNAPro15,588–15,65715,659–15,72870 0L0.03
D-loop15,658–16,56915,729–16,646912/918 H0.14
T-- and TA- represent incomplete stop codons; positive numbers represent nucleotides that separate adjacent genes; negative numbers represent overlapping nucleotides; and 0 indicates that adjacent genes are exactly contiguous.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qi, Z.; Shi, J.; Yu, Y.; Yin, G.; Zhou, X.; Yu, Y. Paternal Mitochondrial DNA Leakage in Natural Populations of Large-Scale Loach, Paramisgurnus dabryanus. Biology 2024, 13, 604. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13080604

AMA Style

Qi Z, Shi J, Yu Y, Yin G, Zhou X, Yu Y. Paternal Mitochondrial DNA Leakage in Natural Populations of Large-Scale Loach, Paramisgurnus dabryanus. Biology. 2024; 13(8):604. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13080604

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qi, Zixin, Jiaoxu Shi, Yue Yu, Guangmei Yin, Xiaoyun Zhou, and Yongyao Yu. 2024. "Paternal Mitochondrial DNA Leakage in Natural Populations of Large-Scale Loach, Paramisgurnus dabryanus" Biology 13, no. 8: 604. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13080604

APA Style

Qi, Z., Shi, J., Yu, Y., Yin, G., Zhou, X., & Yu, Y. (2024). Paternal Mitochondrial DNA Leakage in Natural Populations of Large-Scale Loach, Paramisgurnus dabryanus. Biology, 13(8), 604. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13080604

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop