Key Factors Influencing Elderly Persons’ Willingness to Rent Assistive Devices via a Product Service System
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background
2.1. Product Service System
2.2. Attitude toward AD Use
2.3. Assistive Device Rental
3. Research Methodology
3.1. Study Design and Sampling Method
3.2. Research Instruments and Assessment of Validity and Reliability
3.3. Research Process
4. Analysis of Results
4.1. Data Analysis
4.2. Results
4.2.1. Demographic Variables and Current Status of AD Use
4.2.2. Attitude toward AD Rental
4.2.3. Key Features of AD Rentals
4.2.4. Differences between Demographic Variables and Attitudes toward AD Rental
4.2.5. Difference between Demographic Variables and Key Features of AD Rental
4.3. Empirical Analysis
4.3.1. Correlation Analysis on Experimental Variables
4.3.2. Significance Test of Logistic Regression Model
4.3.3. Determining Variables for AD Rental Behaviors
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions and Recommendations
6.1. Conclusions
6.2. Suggestions for Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- United Nations. World Population Ageing 2019; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- National Development Council-Population Projections for the R.O.C. (Taiwan). National Development Council. Available online: https://reurl.cc/9Xd2MV (accessed on 2 July 2020).
- Cook, A.M.; Hussey, S.M. Assistive Technology: Principles and Practice, 2nd ed.; Mosby Inc.: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Hsu, T.K.; Liu, W.C.; Hu, M.H. Consumer Behavior Analysis of Assistive Device Rental Service: The Caregiver Perspective. J. Long-Term Care 2013, 17, 229–245. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, C.C. The Study of Service Innovation on Business Model of Assistive Rental Industry. Master’s Thesis, National Chung Hsing University, Taichun city, Taiwan, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, M.H.; Hsu, T.K.; Liu, W.C. Supply and Demands of Assistive Device Rental Service: An Ecological Analysis. J. Long-Term Care 2013, 17, 247–266. [Google Scholar]
- Gaiardelli, P.; Resta, B.; Martinez, V.; Pinto, R.; Albores, P. A Classification Model for Product-Service Offerings. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 66, 507–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neely, A. Exploring the Financial Consequences of The Servitization of Manufacturing. Oper. Manag. Res. 2008, 1, 103–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kowalkowski, C.; Windahl, C.; Kindström, D.; Gebauer, H. What Service Transition? Rethinking Established Assumptions about Manufacturers’ Service-Led Growth Strategies. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2008, 45, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mont, O. Clarifying the Concept of Product Service System. J. Clean. Prod. 2002, 10, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuhlenkötter, B.; Wilkens, U.; Bender, B.; Abramovici, M.; Süsse, T.; Göbel, J.; Herzog, M.; Lenkenhoff, K. New Perspectives for Generating Smart PSS Solutions–Life Cycle. Methodol. Transform. 2017, 64, 217–222. [Google Scholar]
- Sassanelli, C.; Pezzotta, G.; Pirola, F.; Rossi, M.; Terzi, S. The PSS Design Guru Methodology: Guidelines and Rules Generation to Enhance PSS Detailed Design. J. Des. Res. 2019, 17, 125–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.A.; Mittal, S.; West, S.; Wuest, T. Review on Upgradability—A Product Lifetime Extension Strategy in The Context of Product Service Systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 204, 1154–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mathieu, V. Service Strategies Within the Manufacturing Sector: Benefits, Costs and Partnership. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 2001, 12, 451–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shih, H.T. A Study of Green Design in Baby Strollers with Product Service System Standpoint. Master’s Thesis, Da-Yeh University, Changhua, Taiwan, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Manzini, E.; Vezzoli, C. Product Service Systems and Sustainability: Opportunities for Sustainable Solutions. J. Des. Res. 2002, 1, 4–5. [Google Scholar]
- Goedkoop, M.; van Haler, C.; Te Riele, H.; Rommers, P. Product Service-Systems, Ecological and Economic Basics; Report for Dutch Ministries of Environment (VR0M) and Economic Affairs (EZ): Hague, The Netherlands, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Mont, O. What is Behind Meagre Attempts to Sustainable Consumption? Institutional and Product-Service System Perspective. In Proceedings of the International Workshop, Driving Forces of and Barriers to Sustainable Consumption, Leeds, UK, 30–31 March 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, Z.L.; Wang, W.J.; Lin, J.X. A Strategy of Improve Resource Efficiency under Product Service System; Environmental Protection Administration: Taipei City, Taiwan, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Tukker, A. Eight Types of Product-Service System: Eight Ways to Sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2004, 13, 246–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.Y.; Wu, Y.; Hsieh, W.Z. Design Thinking Oriented Sustainable Product Service System. J. Adv. Eng. 2019, 14, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Tasaki, T.; Hashimoto, S.; Moriguchi, Y. A Quantitative Method to Evaluate the Level of Material Use in Lease/Reuse Systems of Electrical and Electronic Equipment. J. Clean. Prod. 2006, 14, 1519–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brezet, H. Product-Service Substitution: Examples and Cases from the Netherlands; Funktionsförsäljning-Product-Service System: Stockholm, Sweden, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Fujimoto, J.; Umeda, Y.; Tamura, T.; Tomiyama, T.F. Development of Service-Oriented Products Based on the Inverse Manufacturing Concept. Env. Sci Technol 2003, 37, 5398–5406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- ELIMA Report; Environmental Life Cycle Information Management and Acquisition for Consumer Products: Stoke-on-trent, UK, 2005.
- Ulaga, W.; Reinartz, W. Hybrid Offerings: How Manufacturing Firms Combine Goods and Services Successfully. J. Mark. 2011, 75, 5–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maeda, T. Life Cycle Assessment of Internet Connection Services. NTT Tech. Rev. 2005, 3, 32–34. [Google Scholar]
- Fiksel, J.; Wapman, K. How to Design for Environment and Minimize Life Cycle Cost. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2–4 May 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Leonard, L. Design for Environment. Plast. Des. Forum 1991, 4, 25–32. [Google Scholar]
- Henstock, M.E. Design for Recyclability. Conserv. Recycl. 1990, 4, 253–254. [Google Scholar]
- Alting, L. Life Cycle Design. Concurr. Eng. 1991, 1, 19–27. [Google Scholar]
- Ishii, K.; Eubanks, C.F.; Marco, P.D. Design for Product Retirement and Material Life-Cycle. Mater. Des. 1994, 15, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boothroyd, G.; Alting, L. Design for Assembly and Disassembly. Keynote Pap. Ann. CIRP 1992, 41, 625–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jovane, F.; Alting, L.; Armillotta, A.; Eversheim, W.; Feldmann, K.; Seliger, G.; Roth, N. A Key Issue in Product Life Cycle: Disassembly. Ann. CIRP 1993, 42, 651–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H. Design for Supply Chain Management: Concepts and Examples; Working Paper; Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Stanford University: Stanford, CA, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Li, G.M. The Implementing Method and Strategy for Reliability Technology; Corporate Synergy Development Center: Taipei City, Taiwan, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Paschou, T.; Rapaccini, M.; Adrodegari, F.; Saccani, N. Competences in Digital Servitization: A New Framework. In Proceedings of the XXIII Summer School “Francesco Turco”—Industrial Systems Engineering, Palermo, Italy, 12–14 September 2018; pp. 381–387. [Google Scholar]
- Pirola, F.; Boucher, X.; Wiesner, S.; Pezzotta, G. Digital Technologies in Product-Service Systems: A Literature Review and A Research Agenda. Comput. Industry 2020, 123, 103301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aminzadeh, F.; Edwards, N. Factors associated with cane use among community dwelling older adults. Public Health Nurs. 2000, 17, 474–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogers, J.C.; Holm, M.B. Assistive technology device use in patients with rheumatic disease: A literature review. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 1992, 46, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gitlin, L.N.; Luborsky, M.R.; Schemm, R.L. Emerging Concerns of Older stroke Patients About Assistive Device Use. Gerontologist 1998, 38, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Louise-Bender Pape, T.; Kim, J.; Weiner, B. The Shaping of Individual Meanings Assigned to Assistive Technology: A Review of Personal Factors. Disabil. Rehabil. 2002, 24, 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, H.J. The Impact of Smart Medical Trends on the Development of Taiwan’s Medical Materials Industry. Taiwan Econ. Res. Mon. 2019, 42, 117–127. [Google Scholar]
- Board of Science and Technology. Research and Development of Assistive Technology and Industrial Development; Executive Yuan: Taipei City, Taiwan, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Sung, M.H.; Wang, B.J.; Yu, W.H. The Construction and Evaluation of a Computerized System on Wheelchair Selection. Spec. Educ. Q. 2004, 90, 32–38. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, W.Y. Application of the Taiwanese Version of Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology to People Using Wheeled Mobility Device. Master’s Thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Tu, J.C.; Lin, K.C.; Ho, Y.J. Emotional Factors of Mobility Aids from Senior Lifestyle Standpoint. J. Des. Stud. 2016, 1, 57–76. [Google Scholar]
- Li, C.J. Effectiveness and It’s Correlated Factors of Using Assistive Technology at Homes: Examples of Wheeled Mobile Devices. Master’s Thesis, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Fu, L.Q.; Wang, G.S. Service Design and Product Service System. Ind. Des. 2016, 5, 63–64. [Google Scholar]
- Bernardini, O.; Galli, R. Dematerialization: Long-Term Trends in the Intensity of Use of Materials and Energy. Futures 1993, 25, 431–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmidt, D.M.; Braun, F.; Schenkl, S.A.; Mörtl, M. Interview study: How can Product-Service Systems increase customer acceptance of innovations? CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2016, 15, 82–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tukker, A.; Tischner, U. Product-Services as A Research Field: Past, Present and Future. Reflections from A Decade of Research. J. Clean. Prod. 2006, 14, 1552–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demers, L.; Weiss-Lambrou, R.; Ska, B. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): An overview and recent progress. Technol. Disabil. 2002, 14, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L. Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed.; Prentice Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, S.Y. Statistical Analysis Guidebook Using SPSS, 2nd ed.; Flag: Taipei City, Taiwan, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Bocken, N.; Short, S.; Rana, P.; Evans, S. A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 65, 42–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Catulli, M. What uncertainty? Further insight into why consumers might be distrustful of product service system. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2012, 23, 780–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edbring, E.G.; Lehner, M.; Mont, O. Exploring consumer attitudes to alternative models of consumption: Motivations and barriers. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 123, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baines, T.; Lightfoot, H.; Evans, S.; Neely, A.; Greenough, R.; Peppard, J.; Roy, R.; Shehab, E.; Braganza, A.; Tiwari, A.; et al. State-of-the-art in product-service systems. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. 2007, 221, 1543–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hertwich, E. Life-Cycle Approaches to Sustainable Consumption. In Proceedings of the Workshop Proceedings, Laxenburg, Austria, 22 November 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Mont, O. Editorial for the special issue of the Journal of Cleaner Production on Product Service Systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2003, 11, 815–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SusProNet Report; Sustainable Product Service-Systems: Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
- Huang, C.L. The Study of Assistive Device Recycling or Rental Service Intentions: Taiwanese Medical Instrument Firms’ Perspective. Master’s Thesis, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Setayesh, S.; Anna, W.; Leila, B. Business model innovation for sustainability: An investigation of consumers’ willingness to adopt productservice systems. J. Glob. Sch. Mark. Sci. 2020, 30, 274–290. [Google Scholar]
Item |
---|
1. I will rent a high-quality and high-priced AD. |
2. I may switch to an AD depending on the progression of my disease. |
3. Rented ADs offer a wider variety. |
4. I may get an AD that fits my requirement and will choose to rent one. |
5. The purchased AD is a waste when no longer needed. |
6. AD rentals by a company/physical store provide a sense of security. |
7. I would rent an AD from a place that offers services across the country. |
8. I find the maintenance of the rented AD convenient. |
9. I think is it inexpensive to purchase an AD. |
10. I want to use a brand-new AD. |
11. The rented AD lacks the sense of being one’s personal possession. |
12. The rented AD is not clean enough. |
Dimension | Item |
---|---|
Price | 1. Is the rented AD subsidized by the government? |
2. Is the price of the rented high or low? | |
3. Does the rented AD belong to a renowned brand? | |
Sensory | 4. What is the size of the rented AD? |
5. Is the rented AD trending in the market? | |
6. What is the product weight of the rented AD? | |
7. What are the materials used in the rented AD? | |
8. What is the color of the rented AD? | |
9. What are the design features of the rented AD? | |
Practicability | 10. Is the rented AD easy to use? |
11. Is the rented AD adjustable? | |
12. Is the rented AD durable? | |
13. What are the economic benefits of the rented AD? | |
14. Is the rented AD is comfortable to use? | |
15. Is the rented AD safe and sturdy? | |
Service | 16. Does the rental company offer home delivery services? |
17. Does the company offer efficient maintenance services? | |
18. Does the company offer follow-up services? | |
19. What are the other professional services provided? |
Item | n | M ± SD | t | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | male | 61 | 3.55 ± 0.378 | 0.323 |
women | 68 | 3.53 ± 0.426 | ||
Marital status | married | 6 | 3.13 ± 0.556 | −2.576 ** |
unmarried | 122 | 3.56 ± 0.387 | ||
Current status of AD use | yes | 24 | 3.57 ± 0.452 | 0.366 |
no | 105 | 3.53 ± 0.393 | ||
Rent ADs in the future. | willingness | 101 | 3.59 ± 0.363 | 3.090 ** |
unwilling | 28 | 3.34 ± 0.456 |
Item | df | SS | MS | F |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age | 4 | 0.594 | 0.149 | 0.914 |
Education level | 3 | 0.277 | 0.092 | 0.564 |
Occupation | 11 | 0.544 | 0.049 | 0.286 |
Monthly income | 4 | 0.362 | 0.091 | 0.550 |
Education level | 2 | 0.164 | 0.082 | 0.500 |
Dimension | Item | n | M ± SD | t | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Price | Gender | male | 61 | 4.00 ± 0.664 | 0.203 |
women | 68 | 3.98 ± 0.701 | |||
Marital status | married | 6 | 3.39 ± 0.828 | −2.256 * | |
unmarried | 122 | 4.02 ± 0.664 | |||
Current status of AD use | yes | 24 | 4.03 ± 0.573 | 0.323 | |
no | 105 | 3.98 ± 0.706 | |||
Rent ADs in the future. | willingness | 101 | 4.09 ± 0.628 | 3.240 | |
unwilling | 28 | 3.63 ± 0.755 | |||
Sensory | Gender | male | 61 | 3.73 ± 0.709 | 0.517 |
women | 68 | 3.65 ± 0.605 | |||
Marital status | married | 6 | 3.47 ± 0.414 | −0.833 | |
unmarried | 122 | 3.70 ± 0.663 | |||
Current status of AD use | yes | 24 | 3.67 ± 0.553 | 0.135 | |
no | 105 | 3.69 ± 0.678 | |||
Rent ADs in the future. | willingness | 101 | 3.79 ± 0.653 | 3.451 *** | |
unwilling | 28 | 3.33 ± 0.524 | |||
Practicability | Gender | male | 61 | 4.13 ± 0.766 | 0.719 |
women | 68 | 4.08 ± 0.652 | |||
Marital status | married | 6 | 4.06 ± 0.712 | −0.174 | |
unmarried | 122 | 4.11 ± 0.708 | |||
Current status of AD use | yes | 24 | 4.15 ± 0.643 | 0.316 | |
no | 105 | 4.10 ± 0.722 | |||
Rent ADs in the future. | willingness | 101 | 4.26 ± 0.621 | 5.039 *** | |
unwilling | 28 | 3.56 ± 0.736 | |||
Service | Gender | male | 61 | 4.23 ± 0.702 | 0.912 |
women | 68 | 4.22 ± 0.634 | |||
Marital status | married | 6 | 4.33 ± 0.817 | 0.401 | |
unmarried | 122 | 4.22 ± 0.660 | |||
Current status of AD use | yes | 24 | 4.06 ± 0.677 | −1.346 | |
no | 105 | 4.26 ± 0.660 | |||
Rent ADs in the future. | willingness | 101 | 4.32 ± 0.621 | 3.104 ** | |
unwilling | 28 | 3.89 ± 0.718 |
Dimension | Item | df | SS | MS | F |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Price | Age | 4 | 3.169 | 0.792 | 1.746 |
Education level | 3 | 0.514 | 0.171 | 0.364 | |
Occupation | 11 | 9.805 | 0.891 | 2.102 * | |
Monthly income | 4 | 2.290 | 0.572 | 1.242 | |
Residential area | 2 | 1.301 | 0.650 | 1.410 | |
Sensory | Age | 4 | 4.146 | 1.037 | 2.537 * |
Education level | 3 | 0.808 | 0.269 | 0.623 | |
Occupation | 11 | 4.929 | 0.448 | 1.051 | |
Monthly income | 4 | 0.649 | 0.162 | 0.371 | |
Residential area | 2 | 2.890 | 1.445 | 3.506 * | |
Practicability | Age | 4 | 1.449 | 0.362 | 0.721 |
Education level | 3 | 2.618 | 0.873 | 1.784 | |
Occupation | 11 | 3.871 | 0.352 | 0.687 | |
Monthly income | 4 | 1.873 | 0.468 | 0.938 | |
Residential area | 2 | 2.585 | 1.293 | 2.661 | |
Service | Age | 4 | 0.369 | 0.092 | 0.204 |
Education level | 3 | 1.606 | 0.535 | 1.218 | |
Occupation | 11 | 3.770 | 0.343 | 0.760 | |
Monthly income | 4 | 1.646 | 0.411 | 0.929 | |
Residential area | 2 | 1.283 | 0.642 | 1.463 |
Dimension | Item | n | M ± SD | Scheffé’s Post Hoc Comparison | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Price | Occupation | 1. military, public, teaching | 15 | 4.22 ± 0.430 | 10 > 8 > 3 > 7 > 1 > 5 > 11 > 9 > 4 > 6 > 2 > 12 |
2. electronics | 2 | 3.00 ± 0.000 | |||
3. financial | 1 | 4.33 | |||
4. service | 9 | 3.67 ± 0.624 | |||
5. medical | 1 | 4.00 | |||
6. manufacturing | 4 | 3.67 ± 0.609 | |||
7. design | 1 | 4.33 | |||
8. traditional | 18 | 4.37 ± 0.656 | |||
9. housekeeping | 35 | 3.86 ± 0.701 | |||
10. retail industry | 5 | 4.47 ± 0.447 | |||
11. unemployed/retired | 37 | 3.94 ± 0.706 | |||
12. other sectors | 1 | 3.00 | |||
Sensory | Age | 1. aged 65–70 | 65 | 3.68 ± 0.594 | n.s |
2. aged 71–75 | 35 | 3.48 ± 0.614 | |||
3. aged 76–80 | 14 | 4.01 ± 0.681 | |||
4. aged 81–85 | 12 | 4.00 ± 0.775 | |||
5. aged 85 and over | 3 | 3.67 ± 01.154 | |||
Residential area | 1. northern region | 44 | 3.88 ± 0.766 | 1 > 2 | |
2. central region | 57 | 3.54 ± 0.585 | |||
3. southern region | 28 | 3.71 ± 0.529 |
Price | Sensory | Practicability | Service | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Price | 0.736 ** | 0.428 ** | 0.487 ** | |
Sensory | 0.736 ** | 0.506 ** | 0.485 ** | |
Practicability | 0.428 ** | 0.506 ** | 0.715 ** | |
Service | 0.487 ** | 0.485 ** | 0.715 ** |
−2 Log Likelihood | Cox and Snell’s R2 | Nagelkerke’s R2 |
---|---|---|
109.213 | 0.181 | 0.279 |
Hosmer–Lemeshow test | ||
χ2 | df | significant |
8.295 | 8 | 0.405 |
Key Features of AD Rental Dimensions | B | S.E. | Wald | d.f. | Sig | Exp(B) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Price | −0.435 | 0.498 | 0.764 | 1 | 0.382 | 0.647 |
sensory | −0.466 | 0.596 | 0.612 | 1 | 0.434 | 0.627 |
practicability | −1.473 | 0.482 | 9.320 | 1 | 0.002 | 0.229 |
service | 0.308 | 0.504 | 0.374 | 1 | 0.541 | 1.361 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chang, H.-T.; Tu, J.-C.; Liu, Y.-P.; Kao, T.-F. Key Factors Influencing Elderly Persons’ Willingness to Rent Assistive Devices via a Product Service System. Systems 2022, 10, 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10040113
Chang H-T, Tu J-C, Liu Y-P, Kao T-F. Key Factors Influencing Elderly Persons’ Willingness to Rent Assistive Devices via a Product Service System. Systems. 2022; 10(4):113. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10040113
Chicago/Turabian StyleChang, Hsing-Tzu, Jui-Che Tu, Yen-Pei Liu, and Tsai-Feng Kao. 2022. "Key Factors Influencing Elderly Persons’ Willingness to Rent Assistive Devices via a Product Service System" Systems 10, no. 4: 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10040113
APA StyleChang, H. -T., Tu, J. -C., Liu, Y. -P., & Kao, T. -F. (2022). Key Factors Influencing Elderly Persons’ Willingness to Rent Assistive Devices via a Product Service System. Systems, 10(4), 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems10040113