Next Issue
Volume 3, September
Previous Issue
Volume 3, March
 
 

Systems, Volume 3, Issue 2 (June 2015) – 3 articles , Pages 27-61

  • Issues are regarded as officially published after their release is announced to the table of contents alert mailing list.
  • You may sign up for e-mail alerts to receive table of contents of newly released issues.
  • PDF is the official format for papers published in both, html and pdf forms. To view the papers in pdf format, click on the "PDF Full-text" link, and use the free Adobe Reader to open them.
Order results
Result details
Section
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
159 KiB  
Editorial
Introduction to the Special Issue “Dynamic Decision-Making in Controlled Experiments”
by Andreas Größler and Hendrik Stouten
Systems 2015, 3(2), 60-61; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems3020060 - 18 Jun 2015
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 4202
Abstract
While research so far has mostly focused on static (one-shot) decisions, it is obvious that many (or even most) crucial real-life decisions are dynamic. [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dynamic Decision Making in Controlled Experiments)
682 KiB  
Article
Integration of Standardized Management Systems: A Dilemma?
by Manuel Ferreira Rebelo, Gilberto Santos and Rui Silva
Systems 2015, 3(2), 45-59; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems3020045 - 02 Jun 2015
Cited by 46 | Viewed by 10231
Abstract
The growing proliferation of management systems standards (MSSs), and their individualized implementation, is a real problem faced by organizations. On the other hand, MSSs are aimed at improving efficiency and effectiveness of organizational responses in order to satisfy the requirements, needs and expectations [...] Read more.
The growing proliferation of management systems standards (MSSs), and their individualized implementation, is a real problem faced by organizations. On the other hand, MSSs are aimed at improving efficiency and effectiveness of organizational responses in order to satisfy the requirements, needs and expectations of the stakeholders. Each organization has its own identity and this is an issue that cannot be neglected; hence, two possible approaches can be attended. First, continue with the implementation of individualized management systems (MSs); or, integrate the several MSSs versus related MSs into an integrated management system (IMS). Therefore, in this context, organizations are faced with a dilemma, as a result of the increasing proliferation and diversity of MSSs. This paper takes into account the knowledge gained through a case study conducted in the context of a Portuguese company and unveils some of the advantages and disadvantages of integration. A methodology is also proposed and presented to support organizations in developing and structuring the integration process of their individualized MSs, and consequently minimize problems that are generators of inefficiencies, value destruction and loss of competitiveness. The obtained results provide relevant information that can support Top Management decision in solving that dilemma and consequently promote a successful integration, including a better control of business risks associated to MSSs requirements and enhancing sustainable performance, considering the context in which organizations operate. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

1580 KiB  
Article
An Integrated Architecture, Methods and Some Tools for Enhancing Sustainable Enterprises and Systems
by Paul G. Ranky
Systems 2015, 3(2), 27-44; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems3020027 - 04 May 2015
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 7911
Abstract
Sustainability and, in particular, green sustainability are very complex subjects, because they typically include several integrated sub-systems. Many of these contain dynamically changing objects and variables, which are often difficult to measure and calibrate. Green sustainability means waste reduction and optimization with a [...] Read more.
Sustainability and, in particular, green sustainability are very complex subjects, because they typically include several integrated sub-systems. Many of these contain dynamically changing objects and variables, which are often difficult to measure and calibrate. Green sustainability means waste reduction and optimization with a non-toxic process focus that can be maintained over time, for a very long time. Furthermore, it means the ability of an ecosystem to maintain ecological processes and functions, biological diversity and productivity over time. Sustainable, green engineering design, manufacturing, demanufacturing and re-engineering are changing every aspect of our lives. In this paper, we offer an overview, a systems engineering framework, as well as some methodology and concrete results. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Previous Issue
Next Issue
Back to TopTop