Next Article in Journal
The Naval Postgraduate School’s Department of Systems Engineering Approach to Mission Engineering Education through Capstone Projects
Next Article in Special Issue
TRIZ for Digital Systems Engineering: New Characteristics and Principles Redefined
Previous Article in Journal
Theory in Emancipative Action: Aligning Action Research in Information Systems Education with Critical Social Research in Information Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Trends in Occurrences of Systems Engineering Topics in Literature
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Agent-Based Simulation of Hardware-Intensive Design Teams Using the Function–Behavior–Structure Framework

by Mitch Bott 1,* and Bryan Mesmer 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Submission received: 25 June 2019 / Revised: 19 July 2019 / Accepted: 22 July 2019 / Published: 24 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Collection Systems Engineering)

Round  1

Reviewer 1 Report

Waterfall process is seldom used for software development anymore in my experience - even of significant size. While this is an interesting study, maybe spiral development would have been a better choice, or a follow-on study.


A somewhat related work that might warrant citation is: COMPLEX SYSTEM SIMULATION: AGENT-BASED MODELING AND SYSTEM DYNAMICS https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7274/719e02853b6323720f47f4b486c47258812b.pdf


Line 104. There references might appear more consistently if they were [32,33] instead of current formatting.

Line 127. Consider replacing "already" with "existing"

Line 148. Replace "is" with "in"

Line 172. You organize your teams with 2-4 submodules. Did you do any sensitivity testing to understand what the impact would be if this was exceeded?

Figure 3 and 4. These appear somewhat fuzzy. Can you provide a higher fidelity graphic to make them easier to read?

Line 459. Link to Table 1 is corrupt


Overall, this is one of the best written and presented papers I have reviewed in the past two years across several journals.

Author Response

Please see attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Reference missing page 13.

Author Response

Please see attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Interesting approach is presented, A bit more extensive literature review, and the simulation data and code should be provided for reproducibility

Other minor comments


LINE NR  - COMMENT

48.  literature review section is very very short, should be expanded or pointers added to existing literature review


64.  when FBS is first mentioned, the reference is missing (altough Gero is mentioned later in the sentence no reference is given)


FIG 1 , and other figures - source? (if the author is the source of these diagrams, ok)


93.  waterfall is sequential, not concurrent activities


409.  Justification for the nine total design variables, why were these chosen?


Author Response

Please see attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop