Next Article in Journal
Consumer Behavior, Skin Phototype, Sunscreens, and Tools for Photoprotection: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Antioxidant, Anti-Lipid Peroxidation, Antiglycation, Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Tyrosinase Properties of Dendrobium sulcatum Lindl
Previous Article in Journal
Post-Instrumentation Dentinal Microcracks Induced by Two NiTi Rotary Systems with Increased Super Elasticity and Shape Memory: A MicroCT Comparative and Methodological Ex Vivo Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biochemical Properties and Cosmetic Uses of Commiphora myrrha and Boswellia serrata
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Low-Molecular-Weight Gels as Smart Materials for the Enhancement of Antioxidants Activity

by Aneta Ácsová Toronyi 1,*, Demetra Giuri 2,*, Silvia Martiniakova 1 and Claudia Tomasini 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Submission received: 24 January 2023 / Revised: 10 February 2023 / Accepted: 18 February 2023 / Published: 21 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Active Substances and Bioavailability in Cosmetics)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

„Low-Molecular-Weight Gels as Smart Materials for the Enhancement of Antioxidants Activity” - Comments

Comments:

1.      The title of the article corresponds to the content of the paper.

2.      The aim of the paper is clearly stated.

3.      In the manuscript Authors used : "we expanded”, „we prepared” etc. Authors should use the passive voice in the manuscript.

For example: “In this work we compared the antioxidant activity of two types of antioxidants both 84 in solutions and in supramolecular gels”. It should be changed into: “In this work the antioxidant activity of two types of antioxidants both 84 in solutions and in supramolecular gels were compared”. I recommend to use passive voice in your manuscript.

4.      The research methodologies used and the apparatus used are not objectionable.

5.      The topic of the work is interesting and up-to-date. This is indicated by the current literature cited by the authors.

After taking into account the comments, I recommend the article for publication after minor revision.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Pls see the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

 

The material and methods need further investigation, for example, the detection of antioxidant capacity by ORAC—Oxygen Radical Absorption Capacity; HORAC—Hydroxyl Radical Antioxidant Capacity; TRAP—Total Peroxyl Radical Trapping Antioxidant Parameter

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

accept

 

Back to TopTop