Next Article in Journal
Dermatological Changes during Menopause and HRT: What to Expect?
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of a Ready-to-Use Oxyresveratrol-Enriched Extract from Artocarpus lakoocha Roxb. Using Greener Solvents and Deep Eutectic Solvents for a Whitening Agent
Previous Article in Journal
The Scenario of Clays and Clay Minerals Use in Cosmetics/Dermocosmetics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Formulation of Dermato-Cosmetic Products Using Sanguisorba minor Scop. Extract with Powerful Antioxidant Capacities

by
Alexandra-Cristina Tocai (Moţoc)
1,
Adriana Ramona Memete
2,
Mariana Ganea
3,*,
Laura Graţiela Vicaș
3,
Octavia Dorina Gligor
4 and
Simona Ioana Vicas
1,2,*
1
Doctoral School of Biomedical Science, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania
2
Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Environmental Protection, University of Oradea, 410048 Oradea, Romania
3
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 410028 Oradea, Romania
4
Faculty of Pharmacy, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 8 Victor Babes Street, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cosmetics 2024, 11(1), 8; https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics11010008
Submission received: 9 December 2023 / Revised: 4 January 2024 / Accepted: 9 January 2024 / Published: 11 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Sources for Cosmetic Ingredients: Challenges and Innovations)

Abstract

:
There has been a significant increase in the use of botanical resources for the formulation of topical products designed for medicinal and cosmetic applications. Sanguisorba minor Scop., a botanical species, exhibits a variety of properties and has significant potential for applications in the field of cosmetics. The aim of this study was to formulate topical preparations, incorporating an extract derived from the plant S. minor Scop. comprising a combination of roots, leaves, and flowers. In the initial phase, a total of seven combinations were prepared using extracts derived from the roots, leaves, and flowers of S. minor Scop. (v/v/v). These combinations were subsequently subjected to evaluation for their antioxidant capacity using four distinct methods: 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC), and Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC). An extract of plant organs in a ratio of 1:2:1 (v/v/v), which had a strong antioxidant capacity and demonstrated synergistic effects according to the DPPH, TEAC, and CUPRAC assays (with values of 1.58 ± 0.1, 1.18 ± 0.09, and 1.07 ± 0.07, respectively), was selected for inclusion in three dermato-cosmetic products (hydrogel, emulgel, and cream). All the prepared preparations were evaluated in terms of topical formulation attributes and organoleptic characteristics. The testing of dermato-cosmetic products included assessments of their topical formulation properties and organoleptic characteristics. The hydrogel, emulgel, and cream exhibited varying degrees of stretchability. In addition, a study was carried out to assess the in vitro release of polyphenols from the cosmetic formulations using a Franz diffusion cell system. The results showed that the emulgel containing the extract of S. minor Scop. had the highest and most significant release of polyphenols, with a release rate of 84.39 ± 1.01%. This was followed by the hydrogel and cream, which had release percentages of 80.52 ± 0.89 and 75.88 ± 0.88, respectively, over an 8 h period. Thus, for the first time in the literature, a topical cosmetic product with high antioxidant potential containing S. minor Scop. extract was developed and optimized.

1. Introduction

A cosmetic or toiletry that penetrates deeply enough into the skin barrier to be beneficial to the skin’s structure and function is called cosmeceutical [1].
Cosmeceuticals are a combination of cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. Cosmeceuticals contain biologically active ingredients and are marketed as having medical or drug-like properties [2]. In the current context, cosmeceuticals are considered a subclass within cosmetic or drug categories. In Europe and Japan, cosmeceuticals are considered subclasses of cosmetics; however, in the US, they are considered subclasses of drugs [3]. The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) as well as the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act (FPLA) are the two most important laws related to cosmetics sold in the United States. Cosmetics are regulated by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) under these laws. Other than color additives, cosmetic products and ingredients do not need FDA approval before they go on the market, but laws and regulations apply to cosmetics on the market in interstate commerce [4]. In the European Union, Regulation (EC) no. 1223/2009 offers no clear definition or regulation for cosmeceuticals. Cosmeceuticals are products between cosmetics and pharmaceuticals [5].
In recent years, natural cosmetic products have become more common due to their therapeutic benefits [6]. Sanguisorba officinalis L. is recognized as the most extensively distributed and researched species within the Sanguisorba genus. Nevertheless, Sanguisorba minor Scop. is now attracting interest due to its various beneficial effects on human health [7,8,9]. In general, S. minor Scop. is thought to possess curative properties due to its active components such as flavonoids, tannins, and phenolic acids [7,8], which may have therapeutic implications for wound healing and skin dermatitis.
S. minor Scop., which belongs to the family of Rosaceae, is a perennial plant that commonly grows in most parts of Europe, North Africa, Asia, and America [7,8,10,11,12,13,14]. Species of S. minor Scop. have been used in folk medicine for their diuretic, digestive, appetite-stimulating, and fever-relieving properties in infusions and tinctures [7,15,16,17]. According to Nordborg, S. minor Scop. grows at moist, cool altitudes and in subtropical to temperate climates [18]. As it prefers slightly dry calcareous soil with limestone rock on top or well-drained soil, S. minor Scop. can thrive in soils that are low in nutrients [18,19,20,21,22,23]. It has cold properties, tastes bitter and sour, and is non-toxic and fragrance-free [8,13].
Sanguisorba minor Scop. has been used as a food ingredient because young leaves are edible and available all year round. The herb has a nutty flavor with a cucumber undertone [7,8,13,14].
Generally, the biological activities of S. minor Scop. have not been investigated extensively. However, according to the literature, S. minor Scop. exhibits antioxidant [16,24,25,26,27], antiulcerogenic [17,28], antitumor [29], antimicrobial [10,11,12], neuroprotective [25,30], and anti-inflammatory activities [31,32]. There is a lack of particular knowledge regarding the use of S. minor Scop. for the treatment of skin diseases. However, it has been noticed that the roots of S. officinalis L. have shown efficacy in treating conditions such as urticaria, eczema, allergic dermatitis, and burns [8,33,34,35,36].
The presence of tannins, flavonoids, phenolic acids, and fatty acids in S. minor Scop. has been highlighted in phytochemical analyses. According to the findings of our previous study [7], the primary constituents identified in S. minor Scop. using HPLC–DAD-MS (ESI+) were punicalagin gallate and caffeic acid-glucoside in the roots; ellagic acid hexoside, catechin, B-type (epi) catechin dimer (isomer 1), quercetin-glucuronide, and kaempferol-glucuronide in the leaves; and 2,3-Hexahydroxydiphenoyl-glucose, sanguiin H-10 derivative, sanguiin H-1, quercetin-glucoside, and p-Coumaroylquinic acid in the flowers.
The utilization of creams derived from synthetic sources in the cosmetics industry has been associated with detrimental effects on the skin and the occurrence of allergic reactions. In light of these concerns, the development of pharmaceutical formulations derived from natural sources, commonly referred to as “green cosmeceuticals”, has emerged as a promising alternative. These eco-friendly products have demonstrated positive effects on the environment and human health while also exhibiting a reduced incidence of adverse reactions [37]. Antioxidants provide a dual purpose in various topical cosmetic formulations. Antioxidants protect products from potential oxidation processes. Furthermore, active antioxidant compounds present in cosmetic formulations have the ability to prevent damage to the skin from oxidative damage induced by UV radiation and the aging process [38]. Topically applying cosmetic products containing antioxidants can enhance the skin’s innate defense mechanisms. Antioxidants play a crucial role in preserving skin health by protecting the skin from oxidative stress and effectively mitigating negative effects when applied topically [39,40].
The objective of our research was to find an extract with a potent antioxidant capacity by combining extracts from the roots, leaves, and flowers of S. minor Scop. in different ratios. This was done to find an extract that could be successfully integrated into various dermato-cosmetic formulations. Thus, three different care products, namely, cream, hydrogel, and emulgel, were developed to include an extract obtained from S. minor Scop. All the acquired products were subjected to evaluations from both physico-chemical and organoleptic perspectives. In addition, the release of polyphenols from all three dermato-cosmetic products was evaluated via in vitro investigations employing a Franz diffusion cell. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no reported cases in the specialized literature or by the cosmetic industry of skincare products containing S. minor Scop. extract up to now. Another aspect of novelty is a thorough examination of the combinations of extracts from the organs of the S. minor Scop. plant from the perspective of antioxidant capacity, given that these medicinal plants are typically used either whole or only as an organ for inclusion in cosmetic products.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

Mango butter, beeswax, olive emulsifier, vegetable glycerin, tocopherol, and fragard were purchased from Ellemental Oradea, Romania; carbomer and triethanolamine were purchased from Vitamar Import-Export S.R.L., Bucharest, Romania; and ethanol was purchased from Merck, Darmstadt, Germany. All of the ingredients came with a quality certificate. The distilled water was obtained in the private laboratories with a GFL/205458 type 2008 distiller.
The DPPH (2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl), Trolox (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid), and ABTS (2,2-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6 sulfonic acid) were procured from Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, United States, while the 2,4,6-tris (2-pyridyl)-S-triazine (TPTZ) was procured from Fluka Chemicals, Buchs, Switzerland. The neocuproine was procured from Carl Roth Karlsruhe, Germany. All other reagents were of analytical grade.
A six-cell Franz diffusion system (Microette-Hanson system, model 57-6AS9, Copley Scientific Ltd., Nottingham, UK) was used.

2.2. Plant Material

S. minor Scop. was collected in May 2022 from Bucea village, Cluj country, situated between 46°96′30″ N and 22°68′05″ E. At 648 m altitude, Bucea village has a hilly and meadowy relief. S. minor Scop. plants were identified by the Department of Pharmaceutical Botany at the University of Oradea. Specimens of S. minor Scop. were kept in the Herbarium of the Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Oradea, Romania, and registered in the NYBG Steere Herbarium under the code Uop 05 367-S. minor Scop. After the harvesting process, the roots, leaves, and flowers were cleansed using distilled water and subsequently dried in the absence of light for a duration of 21 days at room temperature. Before their application, the dried organs of S. minor Scop. were ground up using a coffee grinder (Heinner HCG-150SS, Bucharest, Romania). The powder obtained from the leaves and flowers was passed through a pharmaceutical sieve (no. I) with a mesh size of 5600 µm, while the powder from the roots was passed through a pharmaceutical sieve (no. II) with a mesh size of 4000 µm, according to the Romanian Pharmacopoeia, Edition X and European Pharmacopoeia 11.0 EDQM [41,42]. Subsequently, each sample was individually stored in an airtight, brown container.

2.3. Extraction Procedure

The bioactive compounds from the organs of S. minor Scop., such as the roots, leaves, and flowers, were extracted using a 70% ethanol solution. The extraction was performed using a ratio of 1 part of the plant material to 10 parts of the solvent (weight/volume). The mixture was then allowed to macerate for a period of 7 days. Subsequently, the mixtures were centrifuged (using a NÜVE NF 200 Centrifuge, Ankara, Turkey) at 5000 rpm for 20 min. A rotary evaporator was used to remove ethanol from the extracts (Heidolph laborota 4010, Schwabach, Germany) [43]. The samples were labeled as SMR to indicate S. minor Scop. roots, SML to denote S. minor Scop. leaves, and SMF to represent S. minor Scop. flowers. Table 1 shows the ratios (v/v/v) used in the extracts as well as the sample codings in order to produce diverse combinations involving roots, leaves, and flowers.

2.4. Development of the Cosmetic Formulations

The products were formulated and prepared according to Table 2 in the laboratory of a pharmacy. The cream was formed by mixing the oil phase, water phase, actives, and excipients, while the hydrogel and emulgel were formed when a gelling agent was added to the water phase and then continued with the actives or oil phase (in the case of emulgel) and excipients, as shown in Table 2.
All preparations were formulated with natural ingredients, according to our own protocol. All of the cosmetic formulations were formulated and prepared in the laboratory of a pharmacy and the experimental design of preparing the cream (C_SM), hydrogel (H_SM), and emulgel (E_SM) is shown in Figure 1.
The C_SM was prepared using the following protocol: the ingredients, including mango butter, beeswax, and Olliva emulsifier, were heated to a temperature of 80 °C in a heat-resistant glass that was placed in a water bath. The mixture was stirred moderately during the heating process. Separately, in another heat-resistant glass, the distilled water was heated together with the ethanol extract from S. minor Scop. up to a temperature of 80 °C. At the temperature of 80 °C, the distilled water together with the extract of S. minor Scop. was added to the main preparation vessel and kept under homogenization and vigorous stirring for 5–10 min, without cooling, until a homogeneous emulsion was obtained. After obtaining the emulsion, glycerin was gradually added. The emulsion that was obtained was cooled to a temperature of 30 °C, with moderate stirring. After the composition had cooled, fragard and tocopherol were incorporated and thoroughly mixed until a uniform mixture was achieved.
The cream was uniformly mixed and vigorously stirred for a duration of 5 min while it underwent the cooling process. The cream was later recovered in the original packaging in accordance with the established protocol (Figure 1).
The H_SM was prepared via the following instructions: carbopol was dispersed within a solution containing glycerin and water. The mixing process was extended to achieve improved dispersion. Following a 24 h period of being left at room temperature, the mixture underwent analysis. When the carbopol hydration process was completed, TEA (triethanolamine) dispersed in a mixture of ethyl alcohol and water was added in small amounts and kept under continuous stirring until the gel became clear. To the extract of S. minor Scop., fragard and tocopherol were added one by one under continuous stirring and then the rest of the water was added. The H_SM was later recovered in the original packaging in accordance with the established protocol (Figure 1).
The following steps were taken to prepare the E_SM. The emulgel was formed through the dispersion of carbopol in a solution containing glycerin and water. The mixing process was prolonged for better dispersion. We allowed the mixture to remain at room temperature for a total of 24 h. Upon completing the carbopol hydration process, small amounts of TEA were introduced into a solution consisting of water and ethanol under continuous stirring until the gel achieved clarity. In parallel, the mango butter, beeswax, and Olliva emulsifier were melted and the composition was slowly mixed by adding the S. minor Scop. extract and, when the composition had cooled down, the tocopherol, fragard, and rest of the water were added. The E_SM was later recovered in the original packaging in accordance with the established protocol (Figure 1).
Each individual ingredient possessed specific features, which are described in more detail in Table 3.
An extensive literature review revealed mango butter’s antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties, indicating its complementary use as a therapeutic or protective medicine [44]. Mango butter contains tocopherols, which reduce wrinkles and roughness of the skin, while its repairing and protecting properties allow it to be used in sensitive skin care products [44]. In addition to its antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties, beeswax is generally nonirritating and does not cause acne [46]. In contrast, glycerin increases skin hydration by acting as a humectant and skin protector [49]. Since tocopherol (vitamin E) contains antioxidant properties, topical applications have become popular treatments for a variety of skin disorders. The presence of tocopherol in formulas will improve emollient properties and reduce inflammation, which can be useful for people with sensitive or acne-prone skin [54].

2.5. Antioxidant Capacity

2.5.1. DPPH (2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl)

The antioxidant capacity of the ethanolic extract of S. minor Scop. obtained by the DPPH method was determined according to Brand-Williams et al. [55], with small modifications [56]. An amount of the sample (0.1 mL) was mixed with 2.9 mL of a DPPH 80 μM solution and kept in the dark for exactly 30 min, after which, the absorbances were monitored at 517 nm using the UV spectrophotometer-mini-1240 UV-VIS (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). The determination of the % inhibition of DPPH by the samples was carried out according to Equation (1):
DPPH (%) = [(A0 − A1)/A0] × 100;
where A0 represents the absorbance read at 517 nm in the case of the blank (sample with only DPPH solution and solvent) and A1 represents the absorbance read at 517 nm in the case of the ethanolic extract from S. minor (Scop.).
The antioxidant capacity of S. minor (Scop.) extracts was expressed in mmol TE/mL. This result was determined using a calibration curve that was generated by testing various concentrations of Trolox, ranging from 60 to 1000 mM. The equation of the calibration curve was y = 970.07x + 0.6222 and R2 = 0.998.

2.5.2. FRAP (Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power Assay)

The antioxidant capacity of the roots, leaves, and flowers of S. minor Scop. Was obtained by the FRAP method following Benzie and Strain [57], with a few modifications [9]. Thus, briefly, 2 mL of distilled water, 0.1 mL of extract/standard solution, and 0.5 mL of working FRAP solution were added to a test tube. The samples in the test tubes were vortexes and were allowed to react for 1 h in the dark at room temperature, after which, the absorbance was measured at 595 nm using the Shimadzu mini-UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Tokyo, Japan). A calibration curve was made against Trolox solutions of different concentrations (within the 0.06–1 mM range), the regression equations being y = 14019x + 0.0163 and R2 = 0.9969. Results were expressed as µmol Trolox equivalents (TE)/mL.

2.5.3. TEAC (Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity)

The antioxidant capacity of the roots, leaves, and flowers of S. minor Scop. obtained by the TEAC method was determined according to Arnao et al. [58], with minor modifications. In an Eppendorf tube, 10 µL of Trolox standard or sample was homogenized with 1 mL of diluted ABTS solution at 30 °C and vortexed for 30 s. After vortexing, the contents were transferred to the spectrophotometric cuvette and the absorbance was read exactly 1 min after the addition of the ABTS reagent. The TEAC value was determined from the calibration curve against Trolox (percent decolorization vs. Trolox concentration) over a concentration range between 0–0.5 mM, having the regression equation y = 171.47x + 8.2807 and R2 = 0.9989. The results obtained were expressed in μmol Trolox equivalent (TE)/mL.

2.5.4. CUPRAC (Cupric Reducing Antioxidant Capacity)

The CUPRAC method, as described by Apak et al. [59], involves the use of a 1 mL copper (II) chloride solution (1 × 10−2 M), 1 mL neocuproine (2.9-dimethyl-1, 10-phenanthroline) alcoholic solution (7.5 × 10−3 M), 1 mL ammonium acetate aqueous buffer (pH 7), and 100 μL S. minor Scop. extract, followed by water to make the final volume 4.1 mL. After the samples were left in the dark for 30 min, the absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a Shimadzu spectrophotometer mini UV-Vis (Tokyo, Japan), with the regression equation y = 3.8571x + 0.0034. Results were expressed in μmol Trolox equivalent (TE)/mL based on the regression equations y = 3.8571x + 0.0034 and R2 = 0.999 obtained from the calibration curve with Trolox as a standard.

2.5.5. Determination of the Synergistic Effects (SEs) of S. minor Scop. Extract Mixtures

Using the following equation (Equation (2)), we calculated the synergistic effects (SEs) between individual extracts (roots, leaves, and flowers) and their combinations, as shown in Table 1:
SEs = E x p e r i m e n t a l   v a l u e T h e o r e t i c a l   v a l u e
The experimental values were derived from the results of antioxidant assays performed with combined extracts, while the theoretical value was calculated by taking into account the ratios of the individual extracts. The following interpretation of the results was made: SEs > 1 are synergistic effects, SEs = 1 are additive effects, and SEs < 1 are antagonistic effects [60,61].

2.6. Physico–Chemical Parameter Determinations

2.6.1. Organoleptic Characteristics

Physico-chemical testing of the dermato-cosmetic formulas was performed to evaluate their physical properties, color, texture, phase separation, homogeneity, and fragrance [60]. The consistency and presence of coarse particles were checked by pressing a small amount of cream between the thumb and index finger. In addition, phase separation, immediate skin feel, and skin absorption were also evaluated [6].

2.6.2. Determination of pH

The pH was determined potentiometrically, according to the Romanian Pharmacopoeia [42], using a portable digital pH meter (InoLab pH 720, WTW—Wissenschaftlich Technische Werkstätten, Burladingen, Germany). In total, 5 g of sample was added to 20 mL of distilled water previously heated to 37 ± 2 °C and vigorously stirred for 1 min. After cooling, the dispersion was filtered and the pH of the filtrate was determined. Each determination was performed in triplicate.

2.6.3. Density

The relative density was determined using a pycnometer according to the European Pharmacopoeia, Edition 7.

2.6.4. Accelerated Stability Study

The creams were placed in glass containers and covered with aluminum foil for protection against light. Stability at thermostating for a minimum of 8 h at 4 °C and 40 °C was carried out according to the Romanian Pharmacopoeia, 10th Edition [42].

2.6.5. Determination of Moisture and Volatile Substances

For the determination of moisture and volatile substances, g% gravimetric analysis was used. This procedure involves weighing a portion of the sample in an aluminum weighing pan and heating it in an oven at 110 ± 5 °C for 1 h on a single occasion. The total volatile material is the difference in weight of the sample before and after heating [42].

2.6.6. Determination of Type of Cream (Dilution Test)

When the creams were diluted with water, oil in water (O/W)-type creams showed good miscibility, while water in oil (W/O)-type creams showed poor miscibility [6].

2.7. Spreadability Study

The spreadability study was determined by means of an Ojeda–Arbussa extensometer [62]. The extensometer consisted of two overlapping square glass plates. Under the lower plate, there was graph paper with two perpendicular lines that intersected in the center of the plate, where a circle with a diameter of approximately 1 cm was drawn [63]. Briefly, 1 g of the sample was placed on the lower plate of the extensometer, next to the central circle. The upper plate was overlapped at intervals of 1 min and weights from 50 to 500 g were added. The diameters of the formed circles were read each time. The weight and surface reading data are shown in Table S1, Supplementary Materials. The areas of the circles (πr2) were then calculated.

2.8. In Vitro Polyphenol Release from Topical Dermato-Cosmetic Formulas

Evaluation of the in vitro release of polyphenols from topical preparations containing S. minor Scop. extract was performed using a six-cell Franz diffusion system with synthetic membranes (Microette-Hanson system, model 57-6AS9, Copley Scientific Ltd., Nottingham, UK) with a surface of diffusion of 1.767 cm2 and a volume of 6.5 mL for the receiver chamber. The receptor chamber in each diffusion cell was filled with a phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) mixed with 30% freshly prepared ethanol. Synthetic membranes (Tuffryn®, PALL Life Sciences HT-450, lot T72556, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) made of polysulfone with a diameter of 25 mm and a pore size of 0.45 μm were hydrated by immersion in the receptor medium for 30 min before use and then mounted between the donor and acceptor compartments of the Franz diffusion cell.
Each sample was brought into the diffusion cell capsule at a weight of approximately 0.500 g. The system was maintained at 32 ± 1 °C and the receptor medium was continuously stirred (600 rpm) using a magnetic stirrer to avoid diffusion layer effects. A 0.5 mL sample of the receptor solution was collected at different intervals of time (15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 8 h, 12 h, and 24 h) to measure the total amount of polyphenols using the Folin–Ciocalteu method. In order to ensure an even volume (6.5 mL) throughout the experiment, a new receptor medium was introduced at the specified intervals instead of using the extracted sample [64,65]. To determine the polyphenol content, the protocol involved combining 0.1 mL samples taken at various time intervals with 1.7 mL of distilled water and 0.2 mL of freshly diluted Folin Ciocâlteu reagent (1:10, v/v). The solution was agitated vigorously and, subsequently, 1 mL of a sodium carbonate solution with a concentration of 7.5% was introduced. The specimens were stored at room temperature in the absence of light for a duration of 2 h. Subsequently, the optical density was determined at a wavelength of 765 nm using a Shimatzu mini UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Tokyo, Japan). The total phenolic content was estimated from the calibration curve obtained from different concentrations of gallic acid (0.1–0.5 mg/mL) and expressed as gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/mL (y = 27.637x + 0.0069 and R2 = 0.9994). The percentage of polyphenol extract released was determined at each time interval, considering the initial quantity of polyphenols present in products according to Gavra et al. [66].

2.9. Sensory Evaluation of Dermato-Cosmetic Products

The sensory analysis was conducted by a group of 23 women and 17 men of various age groups (6 individuals aged 18–30, 16 aged 31–44, 12 aged 45–50, and 6 aged 51–60). Out of these, 29 participants were from urban areas and 11 were from rural areas. The sensory evaluation was performed at a post-secondary school in Oradea, Romania, that specializes in health education. The participants were offered six dermato-cosmetic samples, each containing approximately 10 mL of the product. These samples were stored in transparent glass containers labeled with random numbers. The volunteers proceeded to apply the formulations to their hands. Plain water and paper towels were provided for rinsing the skin between samples. The volunteers were asked to complete a questionnaire assessing the intensity of sensory properties using a scale from 0 to 10 (where 0 represents “none” and 10 represents “extremely strong”) in two sessions over the course of a month. The list contained 7 descriptors or attributes commonly used to characterize cosmeceutical formulations: 3 appearance attributes (color, odor, texture) and 4 skin parameters (feel on the skin, rapidity of skin penetration, persistence of odor on skin, overall evaluation of indexes). Finally, participants were asked to rate their overall liking of the product on a 10-point scale to see which of the samples they preferred.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Every assay was carried out in triplicate, and the analytical data are shown as the mean value ± standard deviation (SD). Tukey’s multiple comparison tests (one-way ANOVA) were used to analyze the data at a p < 0.05 significance level.

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of the Combinations of Plant Tissues Belonging to the S. minor Scop. Plant from the Point of View of Antioxidant Capacity

Table 4 presents results related to the antioxidant capacity of the extracts derived from the roots (SMR), leaves (SML), and flowers (SMF) of S. minor Scop., as well as the combinations of them. Table 4 clearly demonstrates that the root extract exhibited the greatest antioxidant capacity as determined by the DPPH, TEAC, and CUPRAC methods. Conversely, the antioxidant capacity of the S. minor’s Scop. leaves and flowers varied depending on the method used. Leaves exhibited a greater antioxidant capacity than flowers when evaluated using the DPPH and FRAP methods. According to the results of the TEAC and CUPRAC methods, the flowers exhibited a greater antioxidant capacity than the leaves. Following the combinations of the roots, leaves, and flowers of S. minor Scop., the combined extracts showed varying effects on antioxidant capacity. Four in vitro methods were employed to assess the antioxidant capacity of extracts derived from the combination of root, leaf, and flower extracts of S. minor Scop. The cumulative antioxidant effect (SE) of these mixtures was also assessed, demonstrating the efficacy of the combinations. In the DPPH test, there were no significant differences observed between the samples, except for a significant difference between the 2:1:2 and 1:2:2 samples. The 2:1:2 sample provided the highest value (66.62 ± 3.37 mmol TE/mL) while the 1:2:2 sample obtained the lowest value (43.67 ± 4.71 mmol TE/mL) after completing the DPPH test (Table 4). Conversely, the 2:1:1 sample exhibited additive effects in relation to antioxidant capacity, while the other samples demonstrated synergistic effects. A synergistic effect was observed when combining extracts in four samples (2:1:2, 1:2:1, 1:2:2, and 1:1:2) during the TEAC test and three samples (2:1:1, 2:2:1, and 1:2:1) during the CUPRAC test. Sample 1:2:1 exhibited a synergistic effect in all tested methods, except for the FRAP method. This can be attributed to the distinct composition of the bioactive compounds found in the plant tissues of S. minor Scop. [12] as well as the different mechanisms employed by the tested methods [67].

3.2. Physico-Chimic Characteristics

The organoleptic characteristics of creams are shown in Table 5. For each cosmetic product, C_SM, H_SM, E_SM, and control samples made without S. minor Scop. extract were labeled as CTRLC_M-control cream, CTRLH_M-control hydrogel, and CTRLE_M-control emulgel.
The dermato-cosmetic products containing S. minor Scop. extract exhibited noticeable differences compared to the control samples. The hydrogel exhibited a distinct color, while the control appeared lacking in color. Regarding the emulgel, the color remained consistent, while, for the cream, the control was white and the cream itself had a slightly lighter yellow color. The dermato-cosmetic products containing S. minor Scop. extract exhibited a unique smell derived from this plant, whereas the control products lacked any fragrance. The overall appearance exhibited homogeneity, with no detectable phase separation, and the average pH of all cosmetic formulations was considered adequate.
Considering the organoleptic properties, color was the distinguishing feature among the six samples, along with variations in texture. The difference was evident, as shown in Figure 2. The physico-chemical characteristics of the different cosmetic forms varied. H_SM, for example, exhibited a gel-like consistency that demonstrated rapid absorption into the skin. This gel had a moisture content exceeding 90% and was formulated as a water-in-oil (W/O) emulsion. On the other hand, E_SM was an emulsion with a milky appearance that was absorbed by the skin in less than a minute. It had a moisture level above 70% and was formulated as an oil-in-water (O/W) emulsion. Lastly, C_SM was a homogeneous cream that took approximately 2 min to penetrate the skin. It had a humidity level exceeding 40% and was also formulated as an oil-in-water (O/W) emulsion.

3.3. The Spreadability of the Cosmetic Formulations

The results of the calculation of the radius of the surfaces of the circles of the cosmetic formulations are shown in Table 6.
Based on the obtained results, the spreadability increased with the increase of added weights. Also, the larger the surfaces, the better the spreading capacity of the topical preparations. The spreading capacity, influenced by the presence of the hydroalcoholic extract obtained from the S. minor Scop. plant, was highest in descending order in H_SM, E_SM, and C_SM.

3.4. Release Studies

The gradual release of polyphenols was observed in all tested dermato-cosmetic formulas, with a direct correlation with the duration of time (ranging from 1 to 8 h). Subsequently, the quantity of polyphenols reached a constant level. Figure 3 shows the gradual release of polyphenols from dermato-cosmetic formulations within an interval of 24 h. The penetration of topically administered natural substances, along with the bioavailability and action of the pharmaceutical form, is influenced by three key factors: the skin, the active substances, and the vehicle.
From Figure 3, it can be observed that after 4 h, the release percentages of phenolic compounds from the cosmetic formulations based on S. minor Scop. were over 49%. After 8 h of testing, it was noted that the yield of phenolic compounds from the cosmetic formulations exceeded 75%. In summary, the emulgel formulation that contained the S. minor Scop. extract exhibited the highest yield, reaching 91.77 ± 1.11%. There was a statistically significant difference observed between the three cosmetic formulations at all tested time points (Figure 3). The emulgel exhibited the highest capacity for releasing polyphenols from the incorporated extract, followed by the hydrogel and cream. After 12 h, the release percentage of the cosmetic formulations exceeded 78%. This suggests that all of these formulations can be effectively used as natural products with antioxidant properties.

3.5. Sensory Characterization of S. minor Scop. Dermato-Cosmetic Products

A sensory test was performed to evaluate the degree of acceptability of the dermato-cosmetic formulations (C_SM, H_SM, and E_SM) by the volunteers, and the results can be observed in Figure 4. In addition to its antioxidant activity, the ethanolic extract was incorporated into different cosmetic formulations to contribute aromatic properties. Differences were noted with respect to both color and texture. Sensory analysis was performed to highlight consumer preferences regarding products that contain S. minor Scop. extract. Three control samples (CTRLC_M, CTRLH_M, CTRLE_M) containing no S. minor Scop. extract were used as references. The attributes tested in the case of samples CTRLC_M, C_SM, CTRLH_M, H_SM, CTRLE_M, and E_SM were color, smell, texture, sensation upon entering the skin, rapidity of entering the skin, persistence of the smell, and overall analysis.
The group that performed the sensory analysis was made up of 23 women and 17 men of different ages (6 people between 18 and 30 years old, 16 people between 31 and 44 years old, 12 people between 45 and 50 years old, and 6 people between 51 and 60 years old), in which 29 people came from an urban environment and 11 people came from a rural environment.
Sensory characterization confirms which properties most influence consumer acceptance. All the volunteers thought that the tested products had a good spread on the skin, but many preferred H_SM for its texture, speed of entering the skin, color, and pleasant fragrance. After H_SM, the preference was for C_SM, with high values for texture, sensation upon entering the skin, and persistence of the smell. The participants were also asked about the optimal time of day to administer the cream/hydrogel/emulgel containing S. minor Scop. extract. The majority stated that they use these cosmetic products in the morning. When asked about the usefulness of these products and their future intentions, they expressed a positive response.

4. Discussion

The current study focuses on the characterization and investigation of Sanguisorba minor Scop., a plant that receives limited attention in the existing literature. However, many beneficial pharmaceutical effects such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial activities have been noticed during traditional applications [12,16,32]. This study is original because it involves extracting components from various tissues of the S. minor Scop. plant, specifically, the root, leaves, and flowers, and creating different combinations of these extracts. The extracts were subsequently assessed for their antioxidant capacity in order to identify the extract with the most powerful antioxidant potency. Antioxidants have the capacity to neutralize the harmful effects of oxidative damage caused by free radicals, thereby preventing or reducing the harm caused by reactive oxygen and reactive nitrogen species.
In our previous study [12], we highlighted that S. minor Scop. is a valuable source of bioactive compounds, particularly tannins. Among the plant’s organs, the roots and leaves contain the highest concentrations of these compounds. The leaves and flowers of the plant contain flavanols and flavonols, with quercetin-glucuronide being the predominant compound in the leaves. These compounds are well known for their powerful antioxidant properties.
The methods used to determine the antioxidant capacity in vitro can be classified into three groups based on their mechanism of action. The first group involves an assay that depends on single electron transfer (SET). The second group involves an assay that centers on hydrogen atom transfer (HAT). The third group involves an assay that measures the ability of samples to remove reactive oxygen species or reactive nitrogen species, such as superoxide anion radicals, hydroxyl radicals, singlet oxygen, peroxynitrite, and hydrogen peroxide. The SET-reaction-based methods include the TEAC, FRAP, CUPRAC, DPPH, and TEAC techniques [68]. The most commonly used methods for evaluating the antioxidant capacity of medicinal plants are SET-mechanism-based approaches [69].
The products, which varied in the proportions of bee pollen and Aronia, showed complex properties and demonstrated strong antioxidant effects. These effects were particularly notable due to the synergistic or additional impact of the combined antioxidants. Tirla et al. [61] observed a significant synergistic effect when using a 1:2 (v/v) ratio of chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa) extract to pollen.
In the case of antiradical activity, mixtures of natural flavonoids are commonly used to scavenge almost all types of free radicals and reactive oxygen species (ROS). Flavonoids inhibit the generation of ROS and prevent further skin aging by inhibiting multiple factors that cause ROS generation. For example, the flavonoids derived from green tea leaves/seeds and wine grape leaves and oligomers of these compounds are particularly effective at protecting the skin from free radicals [70,71,72]. Flavonoids in Bauhinia variegata L. prove to have antioxidant properties against oxidative damage by neutralizing radicals, binding iron, and decreasing power [73]. The major bioactive molecules from the fruits of Aesculus indica (Wall. Ex Cambess.) are quercetin and mandelic acid, which have notable antioxidant properties to reduce oxidative stress caused by reactive oxygen species [74]. Pinus cembra L. bark extract shows a better ability to scavenge free radicals than needle extract, and its phytochemical compounds contain more total phenolics and flavonoids than needle extract [75]. Sarkar and Mandal utilized scavenging assays for ROS to examine the antioxidant properties of hydroalcoholic extracts from Cajanus cajan and other Indian medicinal plants. They found a positive correlation between flavonoid and phenolic content in the studied plants and higher antioxidant activity [76]. Consequently, S. minor Scop. presents a significant amount of phenols and flavonoids and possesses antioxidant activity [9,12].
Plants that contain high levels of antioxidants may be able to provide treatment for UV-induced oxidative damage to the skin [66]. The use of antioxidants from natural sources may offer new possibilities for the treatment and prevention of UV-mediated diseases [66,77,78]. From our previous studies, the antioxidant activity of S. minor Scop. roots, leaves, and flowers was evaluated, as well as the total polyphenol and flavonoid contents [9,12]. In addition to protecting against UV radiation, polyphenols reduce inflammation and are strong antioxidants [3,79]. There are flavonoids and tannins that have antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties [80,81]. Punicalagin gallate and quercetin-glucuronide are two well-known, potent antioxidant compounds; they provide protection from oxidative stress [12,13,82] and are present in S. minor Scop. roots, leaves, and flowers. There has been an increasing interest in antioxidant compounds because they represent a promising alternative to UV-protecting cosmetic products [83,84]. In this context, phenolic compounds play a crucial role since they are readily available and widely distributed among S. minor Scop plants.
Yun et al. [85] formulated a cream with ziyuglycoside I isolated from Sanguisorba officinalis L. and examined the protective effects of the skin cream against UVB-induced hairless mice. This cream had precautionary roles in UVB-induced skin damage such as MMP-2 expression (matrix metalloproteinase), MMP-9 expression (matrix metalloproteinase), IL-1β expression, and photoaging in mice. Mlozi et al. [66] formulated herbal creams from methanolic leaf extracts of Tephrosia vogelii for their antifungal and antibacterial properties [86]. In another study carried out on topical formulations containing Rosa canina extract, it was found that the formulations had antioxidant properties due to the presence of quercetin and its derivative quercetin-3-O-glucuronide, which inhibit ROS overproduction and offer chemoprotection for mitochondrial function through antioxidative action. These creams were highly useful due to their bioactive contents, which included flavonoids, terpenes, tannins, and terpenoids [66,85,86].
By combining an extract from Ocimum basilicum and Trifolium pratense, Antonescu et al. [87] created a herbal hydrogel whose efficacy in healing wounds was evaluated through an in vivo test on an animal model as well as an assay based on a scratch test. In vitro tests showed that hydrogel formulations with Ocimum basilicum and Trifolium pratense extracts at a concentration of 50 µg/mL completely recovered the dermal fibroblast monolayer. Following 13 days of treatment with the hydrogel, wound contraction time was improved and healing was complete. Also, this hydrogel was tested on a patient with Psoriasis vulgaris; his skin lesions were remitted and his psychological condition was also improved by the reduction in itching.
In another study, Lin et al. [88] developed a herbal hydrogel based on green tea, Zingiber officinale Rosc, Phyllanthus emblica, and salicylic acid. The gel was tested in vivo for its anti-inflammatory properties and effectiveness in controlling sebum secretion. It was found that polymer-based hydrogels with good mechanical properties, rheological characteristics, and surface morphologies were retained around injured skin, and their microstructures allowed cells to colonize the gel, thus supporting wound healing. Dejeu et al. [64] used caffeic acid for the rheological behavior of carbopol hydrogels and observed that the higher the amount of carbopol used in the formulation of the hydrogels, the greater the release of caffeic acid from the liposomes in the hydrogels over a longer period. Thus, Zagórska-Dziok et al. [89] developed various types of extracts from Cornus mas L. into hydrogel matrices, thereby obtaining efficient antioxidant properties and positive effects on the viability of skin cells in vitro. For cosmetic purposes, Pinto et al. [90] used different percentages of hydro-alcoholic Castanea sativa Bur extracts in a hydrogel base, with 50% of the extracts being chosen because of their high total phenols and flavonoid contents and antioxidant capacity, as well as their technological properties, which made them suitable for skin application. With the growing interest in hydrogels based on herbal extracts, the developed formulations may gain significant traction in the cosmetics industry. In one study, the efficacy of the topical application of an Ocimum basilicum emulgel exhibited the highest percentage of wound contraction, similar to the commercially available silver sulfadiazine cream [91]. An emulgel formulation containing 20% green tea extract and 5% rose oil showed a significantly higher hydration effect on human skin by enhancing the skin barrier function [92]. Emulgel shows better stability than other transdermal preparations; for example, creams show breaking or phase inversion and ointments show rancidity [93].
The application of Franz diffusion cells for evaluating skin permeability is now recognized as a prominent research instrument, offering supplementary insights into the interconnections between the skin and the products being tested. Typically, Franz diffusion cells have been used with excised human or animal skin [94]; however, a more convenient alternative is to utilize synthetic membranes. Synthetic membranes, which come in various forms, are employed in drug diffusion studies or analyses of active compounds in products due to their ability to mimic the properties of skin. Typical membranes include polysulfone, silicone, and cellulose [95]. This study employed a polysulfone-based membrane to detect the in vitro release of polyphenols from three dermato-cosmetic products containing S. minor Scop. extract. As in our study, the emulgel formulation that contained the extract of S. minor Scop. exhibited the highest yield from the release study. Emulgels have been less extensively studied in comparison to creams or hydrogels. However, our study found that the release percentage from emulgels, when using the cell Franz diffusion system, was the most efficient. One study investigated [65] the effects of combining Taraxaci folium and Matricariae flos plant extracts in different ratios. The aim was to create a mucoadhesive polymeric film that would have beneficial properties for treating acute gingivitis. The release of bioactive compounds from mucoadhesive films has been shown utilizing polysulfone membranes in the Franz cell apparatus. The results indicated a gradual release of the phytocomplex from the mucoadhesive film. Another study [64] utilized a Franz diffusion cell system to assess the release of caffeic acid from hydrogels based on carbopol. The porous polysulfone membrane, specifically designed for Franz cell testing, facilitated the diffusion of caffeic acid, which was released from carbopol-based hydrogels. The experiment found that hydrogels with a 0.5% concentration of carbopol released cafeic acid at percentages ranging from 87.69% to 89.27% within the first 8 h. Hydrogels with twice the amount of carbopol released cafeic acid at percentages between 84.98% and 86.29% within the first 12 h.
Research findings by Pinto et al. [90] also suggest that hydrogels with Castanea sativa hydroalcoholic extracts have the highest antioxidant activity compared to formulations without the extract. A study by Zosimidou et al. [96] also found that antioxidant measurements based on sea buckthorn oil enhanced the antioxidant activity of emulsions up to seven times compared to emulsions without buckthorn oil.

5. Conclusions

Testing the antioxidant capacity of combinations of the organs of the S. minor Scop. plant demonstrated that the ethanolic extract derived from a combination of roots, leaves, and flowers shows a significant antioxidant capacity and exhibits a synergistic effect. Thus, three cosmetic formulations (cream, hydrogel, and emulgel) were developed based on a 1:2:1 (v:v:v) ethanolic extract obtained from the organs of S. minor Scop. The hydrogel demonstrated the highest level of stretchability compared to the other two formulations that were tested. From the point of view of the release of phenolic compounds from the cosmetic formulations, the best result was obtained in the case of the emulgel. Through the sensory evaluation, the hydrogel and cream with S. minor Scop. extract were appreciated as cosmetic forms from the perspectives of color, smell, texture, sensation of entering the skin, speed of entering the skin, and persistence of the smell on the hand. In light of these results, we investigated the potential use of an extract with strong antioxidant properties from S. minor Scop. plant tissues in three distinct cosmetic formulations. The results obtained strongly support the recommendation to utilize S. minor Scop. as a source of biomolecules with antioxidant effects for the development of topical cosmetic products in both oil-in-water and water-in-oil formulations.
These findings provide opportunities for additional research on assessing anti-aging characteristics for the development of alternative cosmetic formulations, including hand creams, face creams, facial serums, and facial masks. Additional research is necessary to assess the safety of gels and creams, which should include laboratory experiments investigating the viability and toxicity of cells in vitro. In vivo testing, including patch tests and sensitization studies, is also essential.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cosmetics11010008/s1: Table S1. The surfaces of the initial circles.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.I.V. and A.-C.T.; methodology, A.R.M.; validation, M.G., O.D.G. and L.G.V.; formal analysis, M.G.; investigation, A.-C.T. and S.I.V.; resources, M.G., L.G.V. and S.I.V.; data curation, L.G.V.; writing—original draft preparation, A.-C.T. and S.I.V.; writing—review and editing, A.-C.T. and S.I.V.; visualization, A.-C.T. and S.I.V.; supervision, A.-C.T. and S.I.V.; project administration, M.G.; funding acquisition, S.I.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the University of Oradea through the grant competition “Excellent scientific research related to the priority fields with the goal of technology transfer: INO-TRANSFER-UO”, project number 309/21.12.2021.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical approval was unnecessary as our study focused on the use of natural dermato-cosmetic formulations as topical products, which are non-pharmaceutical and do not necessitate a doctor’s prescription.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Morganti, P.; Morganti, G.; Coltelli, M.-B. Natural Polymers and Cosmeceuticals for a Healthy and Circular Life: The Examples of Chitin, Chitosan, and Lignin. Cosmetics 2023, 10, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nanjwade, B.K. Development of cosmeceuticals. World J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 6, 643–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pandey, K.B.; Rizvi, S.I. Plant Polyphenols as Dietary Antioxidants in Human Health and Disease. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2009, 2, 270–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA Authority Over Cosmetics: How Cosmetics Are Not FDA-Approved, but Are FDA-Regulated. 2022. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetics-laws-regulations/fda-authority-over-cosmetics-how-cosmetics-are-not-fda-approved-are-fda-regulated (accessed on 16 November 2023).
  5. Frazão, D.F.; Martins-Gomes, C.; Steck, J.L.; Keller, J.; Delgado, F.; Gonçalves, J.C.; Bunzel, M.; Pintado, C.M.B.S.; Díaz, T.S.; Silva, A.M. Labdanum Resin from Cistus ladanifer L.: A Natural and Sustainable Ingredient for Skin Care Cosmetics with Relevant Cosmeceutical Bioactivities. Plants 2022, 11, 1477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Springer, A.; Ziegler, H.; Bach, K. The Influence of Antioxidant Plant Extracts on the Oxidation of O/W Emulsions. Cosmetics 2023, 10, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhao, Z.; He, X.; Zhang, Q.; Wei, X.; Huang, L.; Fang, J.C.; Wang, X.; Zhao, M.; Bai, Y.; Zheng, X. Traditional Uses, Chemical Constituents and Biological Activities of Plants from the Genus Sanguisorba L. Am. J. Chin. Med. 2017, 45, 199–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhou, P.; Li, J.; Chen, Q.; Wang, L.; Yang, J.; Wu, A.; Jiang, N.; Liu, Y.; Chen, J.; Zou, W.; et al. A Comprehensive Review of Genus Sanguisorba: Traditional Uses, Chemical Constituents and Medical Applications. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 750165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tocai, A.C.; Memete, A.R.; Vicaş, S.; Burescu, P. Antioxidant capacity of Sanguisorba officinalis L. and Sanguisorba minor Scop. Nat. Resour. Sustain. Dev. 2021, 11, 121–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Finimundy, T.C.; Karkanis, A.; Fernandes, Â.; Petropoulos, S.A.; Calhelha, R.; Petrović, J.; Soković, M.; Rosa, E.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Bioactive properties of Sanguisorba minor L. cultivated in central Greece under different fertilization regimes. Food Chem. 2020, 327, 127043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Karkanis, A.C.; Fernandes, Â.; Vaz, J.; Petropoulos, S.; Georgiou, E.; Ciric, A.; Sokovic, M.; Oludemi, T.; Barros, L.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Chemical composition and bioactive properties of Sanguisorba minor Scop. under Mediterranean growing conditions. Food Funct. 2019, 10, 1340–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tocai (Moţoc), A.-C.; Ranga, F.; Teodorescu, A.G.; Pallag, A.; Vlad, A.M.; Bandici, L.; Vicas, S.I. Evaluation of Polyphenolic Composition and Antimicrobial Properties of Sanguisorba officinalis L. and Sanguisorba minor Scop. Plants 2022, 11, 3561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tocai (Moţoc), A.C.; Kokeric, T.; Tripon, S.; Barbu-Tudoran, L.; Barjaktarevic, A.; Cupara, S.; Vicas, S.I. Sanguisorba minor Scop.: An Overview of Its Phytochemistry and Biological Effects. Plants 2023, 12, 2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Karkanis, A.; Vellios, E.; Thomaidis, T.; Bilalis, D.; Efthimiadou, A.; Travlos, I. Phytochemistry and Biological Properties of Burnet Weed (Sanguisorba spp.): A Review. Not. Sci. Biol. 2014, 6, 395–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ceccanti, C.; Landi, M.; Incrocci, L.; Pardossi, A.; Venturi, F.; Taglieri, I.; Ferroni, G.; Guidi, L. Comparison of Three Domestications and Wild-Harvested Plants for Nutraceutical Properties and Sensory Profiles in Five Wild Edible Herbs: Is Domestication Possible? Foods 2020, 9, 1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cirovic, T.; Barjaktarevic, A.; Cupara, S.; Mitic, V.; Nikolic, J.; Jovanovic, V.S. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity of Sanguisorba minor L. Extracts. Serbian J. Exp. Clin. Res. 2022, 23, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gürbüz, I.; Özkan, A.M.; Yesilada, E.; Kutsal, O. Anti-ulcerogenic activity of some plants used in folk medicine of Pinarbasi (Kayseri, Turkey). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 101, 313–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Nordborg, G. Sanguisorba L., Sarcopoterium Spach and Bencomia Webb et Berth: Delimitation and Subdivision of the Genera; Almqvist & Wiksell: Stockholm, Sweden, 1966; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ceccanti, C.; Landi, M.; Rocchetti, G.; Miras Moreno, M.B.; Lucini, L.; Incrocci, L.; Pardossi, A.; Guidi, L. Hydroponically Grown Sanguisorba minor Scop.: Effects of Cut and Storage on Fresh-Cut Produce. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Calone, R.; Bregaglio, S.; Sanoubar, R.; Noli, E.; Lambertini, C.; Barbanti, L. Physiological Adaptation to Water Salinity in Six Wild Halophytes Suitable for Mediterranean Agriculture. Plants 2021, 10, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Çöçü, S.; Khawar, K.M.; Sancak, C.; Özcan, S.; Bornman, C.H.; Gülbitti-Onarici, S. Plant regeneration in vitro from immature embryos of lesser burnet (Sanguisorba minor Scop.). S. Afr. J. Bot. 2003, 69, 446–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Farmahini Farahani, A.; Tavili, A.; Azarnivand, H.; Jafari, A. Effect of priming and nano particles application on seedling emergence, establishment, growth and physiological characteristics of Sanguisorba minor Scop. and Agropyron intermedium (Host) P. Beauv forage species under drought stress in natural field. Rangeland 2022, 16, 236–255. [Google Scholar]
  23. Torres, C.D.; Magnin, A.; Sabatier, S.; Puntieri, J.G.; Caraglio, Y. Assessing coordinated intra-specific variation in root/shoot traits in two herbaceous species based on architecture and ontogeny. Folia Geobot. 2022, 57, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Romojaro, A.; Botella, M.Á.; Obón, C.; Pretel, M.T. Nutritional and antioxidant properties of wild edible plants and their use as potential ingredients in the modern diet. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 64, 944–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ferreira, A.; Proença, C.; Serralheiro, M.L.M.; Araújo, M.E.M. The in vitro screening for acetylcholinesterase inhibition and antioxidant activity of medicinal plants from Portugal. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2006, 108, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lenzi, A.; Orlandini, A.; Bulgari, R.; Ferrante, A.; Bruschi, P. Antioxidant and Mineral Composition of Three Wild Leafy Species: A Comparison Between Microgreens and Baby Greens. Foods 2019, 8, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Vanzani, P.; Rossetto, M.; De Marco, V.; Sacchetti, L.E.; Paoletti, M.G.; Rigo, A. Wild Mediterranean Plants as Traditional Food: A Valuable Source of Antioxidants. J. Food Sci. 2011, 76, C46–C51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Borrelli, F.; Izzo, A.A. The plant kingdom as a source of anti-ulcer remedies. Phytother. Res. 2000, 14, 581–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cuccioloni, M.; Bonfili, L.; Mozzicafreddo, M.; Cecarini, V.; Eleuteri, A.M.; Angeletti, M. Sanguisorba minor extract suppresses plasmin-mediated mechanisms of cancer cell migration. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA-Gen. Subj. 2012, 1820, 1027–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hosseini, Z.; Mansouritorghabeh, F.; Kakhki, F.S.H.; Hosseini, M.; Rakhshandeh, H.; Hosseini, A.; Hasanpour, M.; Iranshahi, M.; Rajabian, A. Effect of Sanguisorba minor on scopolamine-induced memory loss in rat: Involvement of oxidative stress and acetylcholinesterase. Metab. Brain Dis. 2022, 37, 473–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cirovic, T.; Barjaktarevic, A.; Ninkovic, M.; Bauer, R.; Nikles, S.; Brankovic, S.; Markovic, M.; Stankov Jovanovic, V.; Ilic, M.; Milovanovic, O.; et al. Biological activities of Sanguisorba minor L. extracts-in vitro and in vivo evaluations. Acta Pol. Pharm.-Drug Res. 2020, 77, 745–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Arihan, O.; Özbek, H.; Özkan, A.G. Anti-inflammatory effects of Sanguisorba minor Scop. subsp. muricata (Spach) Briq. and Cirsium libanoticum DC. subsp. lycaonicum (Boiss. & Heldr.) Davis & Parris in rat. East. J. Med. 2015, 20, 81–85. [Google Scholar]
  33. Byun, N.-Y.; Cho, J.-H.; Yim, S.-H. Correlation between antioxidant activity and anti-wrinkle effect of ethanol extracts of Sanguisorba officinalis L. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 41, 791–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kim, S.; Oh, S.; Noh, H.; Ji, S.; Lee, S.; Koo, J.; Choi, C.; Jhun, H. In Vitro Antioxidant and Anti-Propionibacterium acnes Activities of Cold Water, Hot Water, and Methanol Extracts, and Their Respective Ethyl Acetate Fractions, from Sanguisorba officinalis L. Roots. Molecules 2018, 23, 3001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Park, K.H.; Koh, D.; Kim, K.; Park, J.; Lim, Y. Antiallergic activity of a disaccharide isolated from Sanguisorba officinalis. Phytother. Res. 2004, 18, 658–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Park, S.; Kim, D.S.; Kang, S.; Shin, B.K. Synergistic topical application of salt-processed Phellodendron amurense and Sanguisorba officinalis Linne alleviates atopic dermatitis symptoms by reducing levels of immunoglobulin E and pro-inflammatory cytokines in NC/Nga mice. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 12, 7657–7664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tan, P.L.; Rajagopal, M.; Chinnappan, S.; Selvaraja, M.; Leong, M.Y.; Tan, L.F.; Yap, V.L. Formulation and Physicochemical Evaluation of Green Cosmeceutical Herbal Face Cream Containing Standardized Mangosteen Peel Extract. Cosmetics 2022, 9, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vukašinović, M.; Pantelić, I.; Savić, S.; Cekić, N.; Vukašinović Sekulić, M.; Antić Stanković, J.; Božić, D.D.; Tošić, A.; Tamburić, S.; Savić, S.D. Development of a “Green” Emulsion with a Milk Protein Hydrolysate: An Evaluation of Rheology, Texture, In Vitro Bioactivity, and Safety. Cosmetics 2023, 10, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dini, I. Contribution of Nanoscience Research in Antioxidants Delivery Used in Nutricosmetic Sector. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Gianeti, M.; Maia Campos, P. Efficacy Evaluation of a Multifunctional Cosmetic Formulation: The Benefits of a Combination of Active Antioxidant Substances. Molecules 2014, 19, 18268–18282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Council of Europe. European Pharmacopoeia, 11th ed.; European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare–EDQM Council of Europe: Strasbourg, France, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  42. Comisia de Coordonare a Farmacopeei Române. Farmacopeea Română, Ediția X; Editura Medicală: Bucharest, Romania, 2018; ISBN 978-973-39-0888-3. [Google Scholar]
  43. Vicas, S.I.; Cavalu, S.; Laslo, V.; Tocai, M.; Costea, T.O.; Moldovan, L. Growth, Photosynthetic Pigments, Phenolic, Glucosinolates Content and Antioxidant Capacity of Broccoli Sprouts in Response to Nanoselenium Particles Supply. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 2019, 47, 821–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Patravale, V.; Mandawgade, S. Formulation and evaluation of exotic fat based cosmeceuticals for skin repair. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2008, 70, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ingredient Sanguisorba minor Extract. Available online: https://cosmileeurope.eu/ro/inci/ingredient/ (accessed on 23 August 2023).
  46. Nong, Y.; Maloh, J.; Natarelli, N.; Gunt, H.B.; Tristani, E.; Sivamani, R.K. A review of the use of beeswax in skincare. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2023, 22, 2166–2173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Danila, E.; Albu Kaya, M.G.; Ghica, M.V.; Bunea, A.-M.; Popa, L.; Kaya, D.A.; Ozturk, S.; Marin, M.-M.; Dinu-Pirvu, C.-E.; Anuta, V. Formulation and characterization of anti-aging cosmetic emulsions based on collagen hydrolysate and caffeine. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advanced Materials and Systems, Bucharest, Romania, 1–3 October 2020; INCDTP-Leather and Footwear Research Institute (ICPI): Bucharest, Romania, 2020; pp. 139–144. [Google Scholar]
  48. Water. Available online: https://www.cosmeticsinfo.org/ingredients/water/ (accessed on 23 August 2023).
  49. Becker, L.C.; Bergfeld, W.F.; Belsito, D.V.; Hill, R.A.; Klaassen, C.D.; Liebler, D.C.; Marks, J.G.; Shank, R.C.; Slaga, T.J.; Snyder, P.W.; et al. Safety Assessment of Glycerin as Used in Cosmetics. Int. J. Toxicol. 2019, 38, 6S–22S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Singh, S.; Chauhan, S.B.; Gupta, C.; Singh, I.; Gupta, A.; Sharma, S.; Kawish, S.M.; Rahman, S.; Iqbal, M. Design and Characterization of Citronella Oil-Loaded Micro-Emulgel for the Treatment of Candida Albicans Infection. Gels 2023, 9, 799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Shen, J.; Jiao, W.; Chen, Z.; Wang, C.; Song, X.; Ma, L.; Tang, Z.; Yan, W.; Xie, H.; Yuan, B.; et al. Injectable multifunctional chitosan/dextran-based hydrogel accelerates wound healing in combined radiation and burn injury. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 316, 121024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Fiume, M.M.; Bergfeld, W.F.; Belsito, D.V.; Hill, R.A.; Klaassen, C.D.; Liebler, D.C.; Marks, J.G.; Shank, R.C.; Slaga, T.J.; Snyder, P.W.; et al. Safety Assessment of Tocopherols and Tocotrienols as Used in Cosmetics. Int. J. Toxicol. 2018, 37, 61S–94S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fragard, Natural Cosmetic Preservative. Available online: https://www.ellemental.com/860-fragard-natural-cosmetic-preservative.html?ssa_query=fragard (accessed on 23 August 2023).
  54. Keen, M.; Hassan, I. Vitamin E in dermatology. Indian Dermatol. Online J. 2016, 7, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, M.E.; Berset, C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 28, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Vicas, S.I.; Teusdea, A.C.; Carbunar, M.; Socaci, S.A.; Socaciu, C. Glucosinolates Profile and Antioxidant Capacity of Romanian Brassica Vegetables Obtained by Organic and Conventional Agricultural Practices. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2013, 68, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Benzie, I.F.F.; Strain, J.J. The Ferric Reducing Ability of Plasma (FRAP) as a Measure of “Antioxidant Power”: The FRAP Assay. Anal. Biochem. 1996, 239, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Arnao, M.B.; Cano, A.; Acosta, M. The hydrophilic and lipophilic contribution to total antioxidant activity. Food Chem. 2001, 73, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Apak, R.; Güçlü, K.; Özyürek, M.; Karademir, S.E. Novel Total Antioxidant Capacity Index for Dietary Polyphenols and Vitamins C and E, Using Their Cupric Ion Reducing Capability in the Presence of Neocuproine: CUPRAC Method. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 7970–7981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ranjbar Nedamani, E.; Sadeghi Mahoonak, A.; Ghorbani, M.; Kashaninejad, M. Evaluation of antioxidant interactions in combined extracts of green tea (Camellia sinensis), rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis) and oak fruit (Quercus branti). J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 4565–4571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tirla, A.; Timar, A.V.; Becze, A.; Memete, A.R.; Vicas, S.I.; Popoviciu, M.S.; Cavalu, S. Designing New Sport Supplements Based on Aronia melanocarpa and Bee Pollen to Enhance Antioxidant Capacity and Nutritional Value. Molecules 2023, 28, 6944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Neculai, A.-M.; Stanciu, G.; Lepădatu, A.C.; Cima, L.-M.; Mititelu, M.; Neacșu, S.M. Development of New Dermato-Cosmetic Therapeutic Formulas with Extracts of Vinca minor L. Plants from the Dobrogea Region. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Leucuţa, S.; Achim, M.; Tomuta, A.; Iovanov, R. Tehnologie Farmaceutica Industriala, 2nd ed.; Editura Medicala Universitara Iuliu Hatieganu: Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2010; ISBN 978-973-693-371-4. [Google Scholar]
  64. Dejeu, I.L.; Vicaș, L.G.; Vlaia, L.L.; Jurca, T.; Mureșan, M.E.; Pallag, A.; Coneac, G.H.; Olariu, I.V.; Muț, A.M.; Bodea, A.S.; et al. Study for Evaluation of Hydrogels after the Incorporation of Liposomes Embedded with Caffeic Acid. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Neagu, O.M.; Ghitea, T.; Marian, E.; Vlase, L.; Vlase, A.-M.; Ciavoi, G.; Fehér, P.; Pallag, A.; Bácskay, I.; Nemes, D.; et al. Formulation and Characterization of Mucoadhesive Polymeric Films Containing Extracts of Taraxaci Folium and Matricariae Flos. Molecules 2023, 28, 4002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Gavra, D.I.; Endres, L.; Pető, Á.; Józsa, L.; Fehér, P.; Ujhelyi, Z.; Pallag, A.; Marian, E.; Vicas, L.G.; Ghitea, T.C.; et al. In Vitro and Human Pilot Studies of Different Topical Formulations Containing Rosa Species for the Treatment of Psoriasis. Molecules 2022, 27, 5499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Christodoulou, M.C.; Orellana Palacios, J.C.; Hesami, G.; Jafarzadeh, S.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Domínguez, R.; Moreno, A.; Hadidi, M. Spectrophotometric Methods for Measurement of Antioxidant Activity in Food and Pharmaceuticals. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Gulcin, İ. Antioxidants and antioxidant methods: An updated overview. Arch. Toxicol. 2020, 94, 651–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chaves, N.; Santiago, A.; Alías, J.C. Quantification of the Antioxidant Activity of Plant Extracts: Analysis of Sensitivity and Hierarchization Based on the Method Used. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hoang, H.T.; Moon, J.-Y.; Lee, Y.-C. Natural Antioxidants from Plant Extracts in Skincare Cosmetics: Recent Applications, Challenges and Perspectives. Cosmetics 2021, 8, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H. Therapeutic Potential of Phenolic Compounds in Medicinal Plants—Natural Health Products for Human Health. Molecules 2023, 28, 1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Silva, S.A.M.E.; Michniak-Kohn, B.; Leonardi, G.R. An overview about oxidation in clinical practice of skin aging. An. Bras. Dermatol. 2017, 92, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Mishra, A.; Sharma, A.K.; Kumar, S.; Saxena, A.K.; Pandey, A.K. Bauhinia variegata Leaf Extracts Exhibit Considerable Antibacterial, Antioxidant, and Anticancer Activities. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 915436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Zahoor, M.; Shafiq, S.; Ullah, H.; Sadiq, A.; Ullah, F. Isolation of quercetin and mandelic acid from Aesculus indica fruit and their biological activities. BMC Biochem. 2018, 19, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Apetrei, C.L.; Tuchilus, C.; Aprotosoaie, A.C.; Oprea, A.; Malterud, K.E.; Miron, A. Chemical, Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Investigations of Pinus cembra L. Bark and Needles. Molecules 2011, 16, 7773–7788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Tungmunnithum, D.; Hano, C. Cosmetic Potential of Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp: Botanical Data, Traditional Uses, Phytochemistry and Biological Activities. Cosmetics 2020, 7, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Fehér, P.; Ujhelyi, Z.; Váradi, J.; Fenyvesi, F.; Róka, E.; Juhász, B.; Varga, B.; Bombicz, M.; Priksz, D.; Bácskay, I.; et al. Efficacy of Pre- and Post-Treatment by Topical Formulations Containing Dissolved and Suspended Silybum marianum against UVB-Induced Oxidative Stress in Guinea Pig and on HaCaT Keratinocytes. Molecules 2016, 21, 1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Elena, O.B.; Maria, N.A.; Michael, S.Z.; Natalia, B.D.; Alexander, I.B.; Ivan, I.K. Dermatologic gels spreadability measuring methods comparative study. Int. J. Appl. Pharm. 2022, 14, 164–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hano, C.; Tungmunnithum, D. Plant Polyphenols, More than Just Simple Natural Antioxidants: Oxidative Stress, Aging and Age-Related Diseases. Medicines 2020, 7, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Pietta, P.-G. Flavonoids as Antioxidants. J. Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 1035–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Panche, A.N.; Diwan, A.D.; Chandra, S.R. Flavonoids: An overview. J. Nutr. Sci. 2016, 5, e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chaudhari, S.M.; Patel, K.Y.; Badole, S.L. Punica granatum (Pomegranate Fruit). In Polyphenols in Human Health and Disease; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 1393–1400. ISBN 978-0-12-398456-2. [Google Scholar]
  83. Olejnik, A.; Nowak, I. Atomic force microscopy analysis of synthetic membranes applied in release studies. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 355, 686–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Nichols, J.A.; Katiyar, S.K. Skin photoprotection by natural polyphenols: Anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and DNA repair mechanisms. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2010, 302, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Yun, M.-Y.; Bae, E.-Y.; Lee, S.-W.; Yim, S.-H.; Ly, S.-Y.; Choi, H.-J. Anti-photoaging effect of skin cream manufactured with ziyuglycoside I isolated from Sanguisorba officinalis on ultraviolet B-induced hairless mice. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2019, 83, 1197–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Mlozi, S.H.; Mmongoyo, J.A.; Chacha, M.N. In vitro evaluation of the herbal cream formulation from methanolic leaf extracts of Tephrosia vogelii Hook.f for topical application. Clin. Phytosci. 2023, 9, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Antonescu (Mintaș), I.A.; Antonescu, A.; Miere (Groza), F.; Fritea, L.; Teușdea, A.C.; Vicaș, L.; Vicaș, S.I.; Brihan, I.; Domuța, M.; Zdrinca, M.; et al. Evaluation of Wound Healing Potential of Novel Hydrogel Based on Ocimum basilicum and Trifolium pratense Extracts. Processes 2021, 9, 2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Lin, Y.-Y.; Lu, S.-H.; Gao, R.; Kuo, C.-H.; Chung, W.-H.; Lien, W.-C.; Wu, C.-C.; Diao, Y.; Wang, H.-M.D. A Novel Biocompatible Herbal Extract-Loaded Hydrogel for Acne Treatment and Repair. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 2021, 5598291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zagórska-Dziok, M.; Ziemlewska, A.; Mokrzyńska, A.; Nizioł-Łukaszewska, Z.; Wójciak, M.; Sowa, I. Evaluation of the Biological Activity of Hydrogel with Cornus mas L. Extract and Its Potential Use in Dermatology and Cosmetology. Molecules 2023, 28, 7384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Pinto, D.; Braga, N.; Rodrigues, F.; Oliveira, M. Castanea sativa Bur: An Undervalued By-Product but a Promising Cosmetic Ingredient. Cosmetics 2017, 4, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ali Khan, B.; Ullah, S.; Khan, M.K.; Alshahrani, S.M.; Braga, V.A. Formulation and evaluation of Ocimum basilicum-based emulgel for wound healing using animal model. Saudi Pharm. J. 2020, 28, 1842–1850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Yapar, E.A.; Ýnal, Ö.; Erdal, M.S. Design and in vivo evaluation of emulgel formulations including green tea extract and rose oil. Acta Pharm. 2013, 63, 531–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Talat, M.; Zaman, M.; Khan, R.; Jamshaid, M.; Akhtar, M.; Mirza, A.Z. Emulgel: An effective drug delivery system. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2021, 47, 1193–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Supe, S.; Takudage, P. Methods for evaluating penetration of drug into the skin: A review. Skin Res. Technol. 2021, 27, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ng, S.-F.; Rouse, J.; Sanderson, D.; Eccleston, G. A Comparative Study of Transmembrane Diffusion and Permeation of Ibuprofen across Synthetic Membranes Using Franz Diffusion Cells. Pharmaceutics 2010, 2, 209–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zosimidou, S.S.; Vouvoudi, E.C.; Tsagkalias, I.S.; Lykidou, S.S.; Nikolaidis, N.F. Preparation of Cosmetic Emulsions Containing Hippophae Oil Isolated by Various Methods: Study of Their Antioxidant, Sun-Blocking and Physicochemical Properties. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The design of cosmeceutical products: (a) C_SM-cream with S. minor Scop. extract; (b) H_SM-hydrogel with S. minor Scop. extract; (c) E_SM-emulgel with S. minor Scop. extract.
Figure 1. The design of cosmeceutical products: (a) C_SM-cream with S. minor Scop. extract; (b) H_SM-hydrogel with S. minor Scop. extract; (c) E_SM-emulgel with S. minor Scop. extract.
Cosmetics 11 00008 g001
Figure 2. Elaborated dermato-cosmetic preparations: (a) CTRLH_M (hydrogel control without S. minor Scop. extract); (b) H_SM (hydrogel with S. minor Scop. extract); (c) CTRLE_M (emulgel control without S. minor Scop. extract); (d) E_SM (emulgel with S. minor Scop. extract); (e) CTRLC_M (cream control without S. minor Scop. extract); (f) C_SM (cream with S. minor Scop. extract).
Figure 2. Elaborated dermato-cosmetic preparations: (a) CTRLH_M (hydrogel control without S. minor Scop. extract); (b) H_SM (hydrogel with S. minor Scop. extract); (c) CTRLE_M (emulgel control without S. minor Scop. extract); (d) E_SM (emulgel with S. minor Scop. extract); (e) CTRLC_M (cream control without S. minor Scop. extract); (f) C_SM (cream with S. minor Scop. extract).
Cosmetics 11 00008 g002
Figure 3. Percentage of total polyphenols released over time (h) from dermato-cosmetic products containing S. minor Scop. extract. Cream—C_SM (green), hydrogel—H_SM (red), and emulgel—E_SM (blue). The error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean values derived from three repeated tests. Different lowercase letters represent statistical significance between dermato-cosmetic formulations (p < 0.05, Tukey’s multiple comparison test).
Figure 3. Percentage of total polyphenols released over time (h) from dermato-cosmetic products containing S. minor Scop. extract. Cream—C_SM (green), hydrogel—H_SM (red), and emulgel—E_SM (blue). The error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean values derived from three repeated tests. Different lowercase letters represent statistical significance between dermato-cosmetic formulations (p < 0.05, Tukey’s multiple comparison test).
Cosmetics 11 00008 g003
Figure 4. The effects of sensory evaluations of cosmeceutical formulations: CTRLC_M (cream control without S. minor Scop. extract); C_SM (cream with S. minor Scop. extract); H_SM (hydrogel with S. minor Scop. extract); CTRLH_M (hydrogel control without S. minor Scop. extract); E_SM (emulgel with S. minor Scop. extract); CTRLE_M (emulgel control without S. minor Scop. extract).
Figure 4. The effects of sensory evaluations of cosmeceutical formulations: CTRLC_M (cream control without S. minor Scop. extract); C_SM (cream with S. minor Scop. extract); H_SM (hydrogel with S. minor Scop. extract); CTRLH_M (hydrogel control without S. minor Scop. extract); E_SM (emulgel with S. minor Scop. extract); CTRLE_M (emulgel control without S. minor Scop. extract).
Cosmetics 11 00008 g004
Table 1. The combinations used for S. minor Scop. extracts and an explanation of their codifications.
Table 1. The combinations used for S. minor Scop. extracts and an explanation of their codifications.
Codification SamplesCodification Explanation
1:1:1Equal parts of roots, leaves, and flowers of S. minor Scop. (v/v/v)
2:1:1The ratio of roots, leaves, and flowers of S. minor Scop. was 2:1:1 (v/v/v)
2:2:1The ratio of the roots, leaves, and flowers of S. minor Scop. was 2:2:1 (v/v/v)
2:1:2The ratio of the roots, leaves, and flowers of S. minor Scop. was 2:1:2 (v/v/v)
1:2:1The ratio of the roots, leaves, and flowers of S. minor Scop. was 1:2:1 (v/v/v)
1:2:2The ratio of the roots, leaves, and flowers of S. minor Scop. was 1:2:2 (v/v/v)
1:1:2The ratio of the roots, leaves, and flowers of S. minor Scop. was 1:1:2 (v/v/v)
Table 2. The quantities of components employed in the formulation of three cosmetic formulations.
Table 2. The quantities of components employed in the formulation of three cosmetic formulations.
ComponentsCream (g)Hydrogel (g)Emulgel (g)
Mango butter7.50-7.50
Extract of S. minor Scop. *1.001.001.00
Purified beeswax2.00-2.00
Olliva emulsifier3.00-3.00
Vegetable glycerin3.403.403.40
Carbomer 940-1.001.00
TEA (triethanolamine)-1.001.00
Tocopherol0.500.500.50
Fragard0.600.600.60
Distilled water82.0092.5080.00
* Each cosmetic formulation contained 1 mL of liquid extract of S. minor Scop in a ratio of 1:2:1 (v/v/v).
Table 3. The functions of each ingredient in the emulsions that were prepared.
Table 3. The functions of each ingredient in the emulsions that were prepared.
IngredientsFunctionsReference
Mango butterSkin protector, emollient, moisturizer[44]
Sanguisorba minorAntioxidant[45]
BeeswaxNatural emulsifier, humectant, antimicrobial[46]
Olliva emulsifierBiodegradable surfactant/emulsifier[47]
WaterSolvent[48]
GlycerinHumectant, skin protector, solvent, viscosity controller[49]
Carbopol 940Emulsifier, stabilizer, suspender, thickener, gelling agent[50]
TriethanolamineSurface-active agent[51]
TocopherolAntioxidant[52]
FragardPreservative, antimicrobial[53]
Table 4. The antioxidant capacity and synergistic effects (SEs) of extract mixtures from the organs of S. minor Scop.
Table 4. The antioxidant capacity and synergistic effects (SEs) of extract mixtures from the organs of S. minor Scop.
SamplesSMRSMLSMF1:1:12:1:12:2:12:1:21:2:11:2:21:1:2
Tests
DPPH
(mmol TE/mL)
90.87 ± 13.07 A18.66 ± 2.76 B9.16 ± 0.89 C55.59 ± 1.75 a56.68 ± 12.26 a51.97 ± 5.77 a66.62 ± 3.37 a,b54.36 ± 3.46 a43.67 ± 4.71 a,c55.05 ± 9.77 a
SEs---1.42 ± 0.43 a (synergistic) 1.08 ± 0.23 a (additional)1.14 ± 0.13 a
(synergistic)
1.52 ± 0.08 a (synergistic) 1.58 ± 0.10 a (synergistic)1.49 ± 0.16 a (synergistic) 1.72 ± 0.31 a (synergistic)
FRAP
(µmol TE/mL)
8.31 ± 0.30 A8.88 ± 0.01 B8.65 ± 0.08 A,B51.0 ± 4.05 a54.23 ± 5.62 a45.15 ± 6.81 ab56.44 ± 0.62 a45.81 ± 0.99 a36.72 ± 3.74 b49.49 ± 7.64 a
SEs---0.61 ± 0.05 a (antagonistic)0.65 ± 0.07 a (antagonistic)0.54 ± 0.08 ab (antagonistic)0.68 ± 0.01 a (antagonistic)0.55 ± 0.01 a (antagonistic)0.44 ± 0.05 b (antagonistic)0.60 ± 0.09 a (antagonistic)
TEAC
(µmol TE/mL)
3.26 ± 0.17 A1.28 ± 0.09 B1.58 ± 0.27 B1.23 ± 0.05 b2.26 ± 0.16 a1.35 ± 1.12 b3.09 ± 0.89 a2.18 ± 0.16 a1.94 ± 0.16 a2.97 ± 0.05 a
SEs---0.60 ± 0.03 b
(antagonistic)
0.97 ± 0.07 a
(additional)
0.63 ± 0.53 b
(antagonistic)
1.41 ± 0.41 a
(synergistic)
1.18 ± 0.09 a
(synergistic)
1.08 ± 0.09 a
(synergistic)
1.54 ± 0.03 a
(synergistic)
CUPRAC
(µmol TE/mL)
182.10 ± 3.14 A71.54 ± 1.29 C126.29 ± 4.44 B136.56 ± 10.34 a153.99 ± 29.94 a139.49 ± 2.40 a141.06 ± 0.18 a121.06 ± 0.18 ab103.68 ± 13.12 b127.07 ± 4.43 a
SEs---1.05 ± 0.08 a (additional)1.10 ± 0.21 a (synergistic)1.11 ± 0.02 a (synergistic)1.02 ± 0.00 a (additional)1.07 ± 0.07 a (synergistic)0.89 ± 0.11 a (antagonistic)1.00 ± 0.03 a (additional)
Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). The coding of the samples from S. minor Scop. organs (root, leaves, and flowers) is provided in Table 1. SMR—root extract, SML—leaf extract, and SMF—flower extract of S. minor Scop. SEs—synergistic effects, where SEs > 1 are synergistic effects, SEs = 1 are additional effects, and SEs < 1 are antagonistic effects. Different lowercase letters represent statistical significance between combined samples within the same antioxidant test (p < 0.05, Tukey’s multiple comparison test). Different uppercase letters represent statistical significance between organ samples (roots, SMR; leaves, SML; flowers, SMF) within the same antioxidant test (p < 0.05, Tukey’s multiple comparison test).
Table 5. Physico-chemical characteristics of dermato-cosmetic formulations.
Table 5. Physico-chemical characteristics of dermato-cosmetic formulations.
Physico-Chemical CharacteristicsCTRLH_MH_SMCTRLE_ME_SMCTRLC_M C_SM
Overall appearanceSolid, homogeneousSolid, homogeneousSolid, homogeneousSolid, homogeneousSolid, homogeneousSolid, homogeneous
FragranceOdorlessCharacteristicOdorlessCharacteristicOdorlessCharacteristic
ColorColorlessLight orangeWhiteWhiteWhiteCream-colored
Physical appearanceTranslucent gel, viscous consistencyTranslucent gel, viscous consistencyEmulsion with a milky, homogeneous appearanceEmulsion with a milky, homogeneous appearanceOpaque, homogeneousOpaque, homogeneous
TextureViscousViscousSmooth, creamySmooth, creamySmooth, creamySmooth, creamy
ConsistencyGoodGoodGoodGoodGoodGood
Phase separationNoNoNoNoNoNo
Immediate sensation on the skinQuickly penetrated the skin without a greasy filmQuickly penetrated the skin without a greasy filmQuickly penetrated the skin without a greasy filmQuickly penetrated the skin without a greasy filmSome greasiness was observed and no grittinessQuickly penetrated the skin without a greasy film
AbsorptionLess than 1 minLess than 1 minLess than 1 minLess than 1 min1–2 min1–2 min
pH (22.5 °C)pH = 7.49 ± 0.07 apH = 7.50 ± 0.03 apH = 7.00 ± 0.03 bpH = 7.12 ± 0.04 bpH = 7.55 ± 0.02 apH = 6.17 ± 0.03 c
Density (g/cm3)1.10 ± 0.04 a1.13 ± 0.03 a1.11 ± 0.03 a1.16 ± 0.02 a0.95 ± 0.03 b1.02 ± 0.03 b
Moisture and volatile substances (g%)90.15 ± 1.07 b95.04 ± 0.04 a78.12 ± 0.05 c78.37 ± 0.05 c24.80 ± 0.03 e43.32 ± 0.04 d
Determination of solubilityMethyl alcohol: partially soluble
Warm water: soluble
Petroleum ether: soluble
Methyl alcohol: partially soluble
Warm water: soluble
Petroleum ether: soluble
Methyl alcohol: partially soluble
Warm water: soluble
Petroleum ether: soluble
Methyl alcohol: partially soluble
Warm water: soluble
Petroleum ether: soluble
Methyl alcohol: soluble
Warm water: soluble
Petroleum ether: insoluble
Methyl alcohol: soluble
Warm water: soluble
Petroleum ether: insoluble
Determination of stability during thermostatingStable, without phase separationStable, without phase separationStable, without phase separationStable, without phase separation Stable, without phase separationStable, without phase separation
Determination of the type of emulsionW/OW/OO/WO/WO/WO/W
CTRLH_M—hydrogel control without S. minor Scop. extract; H_SM—hydrogel with S. minor Scop. extract; CTRLE_M—emulgel control without S. minor Scop. extract; E_SM—emulgel with S. minor Scop. extract; CTRLC_M—cream control without S. minor Scop. extract; C_SM—cream with S. minor Scop. extract; O/W—oil-in-water base; W/O—water-in-oil base. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Different lowercase letters represent statistical significance between dermato-cosmetic formulations within the same line (p < 0.05, Tukey’s multiple comparison test).
Table 6. The circle surfaces from the investigated dermato-cosmetic samples.
Table 6. The circle surfaces from the investigated dermato-cosmetic samples.
Weight (g)Stretching Capacity Results (cm2)
C_SME_SMH_SM
07.11 ± 0.47 b3.16 ± 0.12 c12.62 ± 1.05 a
509.12 ± 0.94 b3.81 ± 0.37 c15.23 ± 1.45 a
10010.17 ± 0.92 b5.31 ± 0.32 c19.65 ± 1.03 a
15011.89 ± 1.11 b7.08 ± 0.62 c19.62 ± 0.93 a
20013.50 ± 0.82 b12.58 ± 1.03 b21.25 ± 1.73 a
25015.23 ± 1.84 b13.90 ± 1.35 b22.90 ± 1.92 a
30016.63 ± 1.05 b19.67 ± 1.44 b24.62 ± 2.04 a
35018.11 ± 1.12 c21.23 ± 1.95 b26.40 ± 1.82 a
40019.62 ± 1.54 b24.59 ± 2.04 a28.28 ± 1.92 a
45021.25 ± 2.04 b28.28 ± 2.73 a28.26 ± 2.13 a
50022.91 ± 1.82 b30.19 ± 2.02 a28.27 ± 2.67 a
Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Different lowercase letters represent statistical significance between dermato-cosmetic formulations within the same line (p < 0.05, Tukey’s multiple comparison test). C_SM—cream with S. minor Scop. extract; E_SM—emulgel with S. minor Scop. extract; H_SM—hydrogel with S. minor Scop. extract.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tocai, A.-C.; Memete, A.R.; Ganea, M.; Vicaș, L.G.; Gligor, O.D.; Vicas, S.I. The Formulation of Dermato-Cosmetic Products Using Sanguisorba minor Scop. Extract with Powerful Antioxidant Capacities. Cosmetics 2024, 11, 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics11010008

AMA Style

Tocai A-C, Memete AR, Ganea M, Vicaș LG, Gligor OD, Vicas SI. The Formulation of Dermato-Cosmetic Products Using Sanguisorba minor Scop. Extract with Powerful Antioxidant Capacities. Cosmetics. 2024; 11(1):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics11010008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tocai (Moţoc), Alexandra-Cristina, Adriana Ramona Memete, Mariana Ganea, Laura Graţiela Vicaș, Octavia Dorina Gligor, and Simona Ioana Vicas. 2024. "The Formulation of Dermato-Cosmetic Products Using Sanguisorba minor Scop. Extract with Powerful Antioxidant Capacities" Cosmetics 11, no. 1: 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics11010008

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop