Simulating the Dispersion of the Energy Flux Density of the Electromagnetic Field Generated by Antennas for Mobile Communications
, Birute Strukcinskiene 4, Rimantas Stukas 1, Donatas Austys 1, Jacek Caban 5,*, Marcin Bogucki 5, Aurelija Sidlauskiene 1, Vaiva Seleviciene 6,7, Artūras Kilikevičius 3, Jonas Matijošius 3,*, Kristina Kilikevičienė 3 and Darius Vainorius 3
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The authors improved the description of their work. In my opinion, the manuscript would by of interest for specialists in the telecommunications.
Author Response
Dear Reviewer,
Thank you very much for Your reviews and remarks of our article. We have prepared a re-submitted revised version of the article. We hope that the article made an adjustment in Your remarks.
We appreciate your time to review our article. Thank you, no doubt, the quality of this study has improved and your comments provided us with an opportunity for a deeper analysis of the problem being solved, what we will continue to research in the future.
Authors
Reviewer 2 Report
All the raised concerns have been addressed. The manuscript could be accepted in present form after minor spell and grammar check.
Author Response
Dera Reviewer,
Thank you very much for Your reviews and remarks of our article. We have prepared a re-submitted revised version of the article. We hope that the article made an adjustment in Your remarks.
We appreciate your time to review our article. Thank you, no doubt, the quality of this study has improved and your comments provided us with an opportunity for a deeper analysis of the problem being solved, what we will continue to research in the future.
In addition, minor spell and grammar were checked.
Authors
Reviewer 3 Report
In this manuscript the Energy Flux Density of the Electromagnetic Field Generated by Mobile Antennas is investigated. This is good work, which can be accepted after some minor modifications, which listed as follows:
1- Specific absorption rate (SAR) parameter should be briefly discussed and explained.
2- References are not cited in numerical order. For example, ref [28] cited before ref [27].
3- Line 191 is only a dot sign “.”.
4- Equations (1),(9), (10), (11),(12) (13) were not cited in the text.
5- In Line 211 “Equation 2–8 show….”, should be replaced with Equations 2-8.
6- To have better understanding add measurement scale in Figs 8-11. And also provide occupied area of snapshot.
7- Add explanations about measurement device and measurement Field Meter. Provide some picture of measurement setup
8- Is Daytime and Nighttime has different effect on the result?
9- The references are too old. Add some new references.
10- What is the application of equations 1 to 14 in the results of your work?
11- Is this possible to provide Statistical distribution of the energy flux density levels for different distances?
Author Response
Dear Reviewer,
Thank you very much for Your reviews and remarks of our article. We have prepared a re-submitted revised version of the article. We hope that the article made an adjustment in Your remarks.
We appreciate your time to review our article. Thank you, no doubt, the quality of this study has improved and your comments provided us with an opportunity for a deeper analysis of the problem being solved, what we will continue to research in the future.
We have endeavored to meet your expectations for Your advice.
Authors
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
