Next Article in Journal
Adaptively Periodic I/O Scheduling for Concurrent HPC Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Electroencephalogram Signals for Detecting Confused Students in Online Education Platforms with Probability-Based Features
Previous Article in Journal
Digital Taste in Mulsemedia Augmented Reality: Perspective on Developments and Challenges
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification of the Factors That Influence University Learning with Low-Code/No-Code Artificial Intelligence Techniques
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Building and Using Multiple Stacks of Models for the Classification of Learners and Custom Recommending of Quizzes

Electronics 2022, 11(9), 1316; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11091316
by Marian Cristian Mihăescu *, Paul Ştefan Popescu and Mihai Lucian Mocanu
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Electronics 2022, 11(9), 1316; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11091316
Submission received: 25 March 2022 / Revised: 14 April 2022 / Accepted: 18 April 2022 / Published: 21 April 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The writing of the paper needs a lot of improvement in terms of grammar, spelling, and presentations. The paper needs careful English polishing since there are many typos and poorly written sentences.

Some examples are as the following:

*     Check the usage of the commas carefully.

*     Check the articles including "a", "an" and "the".

*      Check the required and unneeded blank spaces.

- the final part of the abstract is not attractive

-introduction you can present better novelty of your work

-literature analysis can be improved

-conclusions please report only relevant information

-please check all text to see grammatical errors

-Avoid repetitions. I can see several repetitions at different places in this paper. Thorough proofreading is required.

-There is no scope for future research. A clear direction for future research is required.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you for your kind feedback, please check the revised version.

 

Thank you,

Cristian Mihaescu

 

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript is well written, it adds new informations to international literature. It could be published in the present form.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you for your kind feedback.

At a new read, we have spotted a few small issues, so we attach the revised version.

Thank you,

Cristian Mihaescu

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop