6G IoT Tracking- and Machine Learning-Enhanced Blockchained Supply Chain Management

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper is very verbose. Please make it concise.
Please add more detailed results. Also, increase the size of the font in the figure legend.
Figure 1 can have a more relevant representation. Figures 2 and 3 are not readable.
The difference between blockchains and decentralized systems is not clear. Kindly make that clear in writing.

Author Response

See the attachment for the reviewing comments, thank you very much.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The scope of the paper must be reformulated.

The authors should update the whole paper, presenting it as a study for comparison between two ML forecast tools, applied to modern supply chain management.

However, if the authors want to keep the object of the study as it is presented in the title, abstract, and Introduction (which is very comprehensive and well-written), you should add more material (experiment and text) to show the relationship between the existing section 4 (simulations) and both 6G IoT Tracking and Blockchain.

Further comments are in the attached document.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

See the attachment for the reviewing comments, thank you very much.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

1. Highlight the contribution of the study in the penultimate paragraph under the Introduction section.

2. Does there exist any imbalance in the dataset? If so, how these imbalance  situation is handled?

3. It is suggested that apart from Accuracy, the authors should considered other performance metrics (e.g., f1-score, Jaccard score, etc) to judge the performance of the estimator.

4. Discuss the limitation of the study in a separate section 

 5. The future scope of the study should be written in a a separate paragraph under the Conclusion section.

Author Response

See the attachment for the reviewing comments, thank you very much.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The comments embedded in the attached document.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment for the reply to the comments, thank you very much.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf