Next Article in Journal
A Novel Power Distribution Strategy and Its Online Implementation for Hybrid Energy Storage Systems of Electric Vehicles
Previous Article in Journal
Distributed Deep Neural-Network-Based Middleware for Cyber-Attacks Detection in Smart IoT Ecosystem: A Novel Framework and Performance Evaluation Approach
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Self-Calibration Method of Noncontact AC Voltage Measurement

Electronics 2023, 12(2), 300; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12020300
by Wenbin Zhang 1, Ran Wei 2, Aerduoni Jiu 3,*, Kang Cheng 2, Yonglong Yang 1 and Chunguang Suo 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Electronics 2023, 12(2), 300; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12020300
Submission received: 15 December 2022 / Revised: 28 December 2022 / Accepted: 2 January 2023 / Published: 6 January 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this paper, a self-calibration method for non-contact AC voltage measurement has been presented.

The paper seems to be interesting but, in my opinion, the quality of the presentation is too low. In details, Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, and 10 are difficult to understand since they lack of node names and differentiations between conductive layers (capacitance plates).

I suggest a massive revision of the aforementioned images, using colors, legends, and, where possible, 3D color drawings. Without these preliminary changes, the manuscript cannot be revised properly.

Below some detailed indications for the Authors to improve the manuscript readability. Just the firsts 4 images are considered as examples, but the revisions from Authors have to consider all the abovementioned Figures.

1. In Fig. 1, I think that V0 is Vx.

2. In Fig. 2, the Transmission Line Ideal Model seems to be a coaxial cable, but it's not. I think it should be a structure similar to a triaxial cable.

3. In Fig. 3, where are the capacitances involved in the calculations?

4. In Fig. 4, it is impossible to understand how the probe is placed.

Conclusively, I recommand for the presented paper major revision.

Author Response

Thank you for reviewing our manuscript,please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

1. There is no quantitative performance reported in the abstract.

2. What are the required specification of the amplifier? refer to the analog circuit in Figure 10. 

Author Response

Thank you for reviewing our manuscript,please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

thanks for properly revising the manuscript. The calculations and experiment performed are now correctly explained.

Back to TopTop