Next Article in Journal
Audio Pre-Processing and Beamforming Implementation on Embedded Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Enhanced Satellite Analytics for Mussel Platform Census Using a Machine-Learning Based Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Millimeter-Wave GaN High-Power Amplifier MMIC Design Guideline Considering a Source via Effect
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of a Spike-Annealed HfO2 Gate Dielectric Layer on the On-Resistance and Interface Quality of AlGaN/GaN High-Electron-Mobility Transistors

1
Department of Intelligent Semiconductors, Soongsil University, Seoul 06978, Republic of Korea
2
School of Electronic Engineering, Soongsil University, Seoul 06938, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this study.
Current affiliation: Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA.
Electronics 2024, 13(14), 2783; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142783
Submission received: 10 June 2024 / Revised: 8 July 2024 / Accepted: 11 July 2024 / Published: 15 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges, Innovation and Future Perspectives of GaN Technology)

Abstract

:
Various high-k dielectrics have been proposed for AlGaN/GaN MOSHEMTs for gate leakage and drain-current collapse suppression. Hafnium oxide (HfO2) is particularly interesting because of its large bandgap, high dielectric constant, and ferroelectricity under specific phase and doping conditions. However, defects and surface scattering caused by HfO2 dissimilarity and degraded HfO2/GaN interface quality still leave the challenge of reducing the SS and Ron. In this study, we investigated the effects of the first spike-annealed HfO2 (6 nm) layer, compared with the conventional ALD-HfO2 (6 nm) layer in the HfO2 bilayer gate dielectric structure on AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. Both devices exhibit negligible hysteresis and near-ideal (~60 mV/dec) subthreshold slopes of more than three orders of magnitude. The device with the first annealed HfO2 layer exhibited a reduced Ron with notably less gate bias dependency and enhanced output current. On the other hand, the capacitance–voltage and conductance methods revealed that the border and interface trap densities of the device were inferior to those of the conventional HfO2 layer. The trade-off between enhanced electrical performance and oxide traps is discussed based on these results.

1. Introduction

Gallium nitride (GaN)-based high-electron-mobility transistors (HEMTs) have emerged as compelling candidates for high-power and radio frequency (RF) applications, leveraging their superior attributes, including their high electron mobility and robust breakdown fields. III-Nitrides (InN, GaN, and AlN) have been previously investigated for their intrinsic spontaneous polarization and piezoelectricity, augmenting the appeal of GaN-based HEMTs [1,2,3]. These distinctive material characteristics have propelled extensive research and commercialization efforts, leading to the widespread adoption of AlGaN/GaN-based HEMTs in high-frequency and high-power applications [4,5,6,7]. Over the past two decades, AlGaN/GaN-based HEMTs have gained increased attention and commercialization by harnessing the exceptional intrinsic material properties of III nitrides [8,9,10].
Despite the many advantages of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs, suppressing gate leakage and isolating an AlGaN surface from the surrounding environment remain challenging when optimizing the performance of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs [11,12,13]. To overcome the shortcomings of conventional AlGaN/GaN HEMTs, a metal-oxide semiconductor (MOS) AlGaN/GaN HEMT has been proposed and investigated. The dielectric layer not only prevents gate leakage but also isolates the AlGaN surface from the surrounding environment, promoting reliability [14,15]. Since the introduction of the AlGaN/GaN MOS-HEMT structure, many studies have searched for promising building materials. Notably, high-k dielectric materials have the potential to increase physical thickness, owing to their high dielectric constants, and reduce the tunneling leakage current [16,17,18,19]. Among high-k dielectric materials, HfO2 is particularly attractive because of its unique characteristics. It is well known that HfO2 not only possesses a high dielectric constant, but also induces ferroelectricity under specific conditions, in which the implementation of a dopant or annealing at high temperatures is applied [20,21,22,23].
The current collapse and low switching speed of AlGaN/GaN MOS-HEMTs, determined by the poor subthreshold slope (SS) and high on-resistance (Ron), significantly impact its power efficiency degradation [7,24,25]. Although harnessing HfO2 in AlGaN/GaN MOS-HEMTs is promising for mitigating the aforementioned problems, defects, and surface scattering caused by HfO2 dissimilarity, and host materials still present the challenge of reducing the SS and Ron [15,26]. Consequently, the requirement for the introduction of additional steps to enhance the interface quality of HfO2/AlGaN results in the exploitation of the spiking annealing process [12]. As previously reported, the spiking annealing process enables the device to have a low SS and a simple fabrication process. Nevertheless, owing to a thick HfO2 layer of ~60 nm and a non-optimized fabrication process, spike-annealed HfO2-based AlGaN/GaN MOS-HEMTs are responsible for the low drain current and high Ron [21].
In this study, we investigated the effects of the first annealed HfO2 (6 nm) layer compared to the conventional ALD-HfO2 (6 nm) layer in the HfO2 bilayer gate dielectric structure on AlGaN/GaN HEMTs. Spike annealing was conducted on the first HfO2 layer, and a capping HfO2 (10 nm) layer was formed to suppress gate leakage into the gate electrode. The transfer length method (TLM) and direct-current (DC) characterizations were conducted to compare the channel conductivity and electrical performance. Furthermore, the conventional frequency-dependent capacitance–voltage was measured to compare the hysteretic behavior and border traps. Finally, the conductance method was employed to evaluate the interface traps in both bilayers with AlGaN, and the interface trap density and trap lifetime were extracted and compared.

2. Device Fabrication and Characterization

Figure 1a shows a cross-sectional schematic of the fabricated AlGaN/GaN MOSHEMT, with an HfO2 bilayer. The AlGaN/GaN heterostructure was grown via metal–organic vapor deposition (MOCVD) on a 2 in silicon substrate. The structure consists of a 3 nm GaN cap layer, 25 nm Al0.26Ga0.74N barrier, 1 nm AlN interlayer, 2 μmm GaN channel layer, and 1 μmm buffer layer. The room temperature Hall mobility and sheet carrier concentration were >1300 cm2/Vs and ~1013 cm−2, respectively. The fabrication began with mesa isolation via an inductively coupled plasma reactive ion etching (ICP-RIE) system using mixed BCl3/Cl2 gas. For ohmic contact, a Ti/Al/Ni/Au metal stack was deposited through e-beam evaporation and annealed using a rapid thermal annealing system at 830 °C for 30 s in an N2 environment. Subsequently, 6 nm of HfO2 was deposited via atomic layer deposition (ALD) with a tetrakis (ethylmethylamino) hafnium (TEMAH) precursor and ozone reactants at a stage temperature of 350 °C [27]. Then, thermal annealing at 650 °C for 30 s in an N2 environment was conducted to improve the interface [18,28,29]. This additional annealing was not performed on the other control devices. To minimize gate leakage through the grain boundaries of the 6 nm HfO2 layer, an additional 10 nm thick HfO2 dielectric layer was deposited under the same ALD conditions. No final passivation layer was applied on top of the HfO2 layer. ICP-RIE was conducted to open the S/D contacts. Finally, a Ni/Au gate electrode was deposited using an e-beam evaporation system. The gate length, channel length, and channel width were 8, 35, and 120 μm, respectively. Figure 1b shows the main steps of the fabrication process. All electrical measurements were conducted using a semiconductor parameter analyzer with a pre-amp (Keithley-4200A-SCS). An HP4284A LCR meter was used to characterize the capacitance and conductance.

3. Results and Discussion

TLM measurements were conducted to compare the contact resistance (Rc) of the S/D metal scheme, as well as the sheet resistance (Rsh) of devices A and NA. The total resistance (R) for variable gap spacings between 4 and 10 µm was calculated from the IDSVDS curves shown in Figure 2a,b for devices A and NA, respectively. Subsequently, Rc, Rsh, and contact resistivity (ρc) were extracted from the slopes and y-intercepts of a linear fit on the results, as shown in Figure 2c,d. The Rsh of device A decreased from 783 to 544 Ω/□,compared with that of device NA, while its Rc increased from 3.01 to 3.41 Ω·mm. The high-temperature annealing process induced the polycrystallization of the HfO2 layer (6 nm), and generated additional charges within the layer, resulting in an increased carrier density in the 2DEG channel. Therefore, the channel conductivity improved, and Rsh decreased for device A.
Further direct comparison was conducted based on the transfer and output characteristics. Device A exhibited an overall improvement in device performance, with a lower Rsh in the channel layer. Figure 3a,b show the bidirectional IDSVGS transfer curves for the log and linear scales at VDS = 1 and 10 V, respectively. Negligible hysteresis was observed for both devices A and NA, and the gate leakage was well suppressed for both VDS = 1 and 10 V during the sweep. The peak field–effect mobility of devices NA and A was estimated to be 1252 cm2/V·s and 1401 cm2/V·s, respectively, at VDS = 1V. Using a linear extrapolation method at the forward sweep, Vth of −3.92 V and −3.74 V was extracted at VDS = 1 V and 10 V, respectively, for device NA. In the case of device A, the Vth of −4.26 V and −4.01 V was extracted at VDS = 1 V and 10 V, respectively. The transfer curves of device A shifted in a negative direction compared to those of device NA due to the increase in the electron density of 2DEG. Also, Ron was reduced, which is particularly advantageous for power-switching applications. The amount of Vth shift was approximately −0.3 V for both VDS = 1 and 10 V. This result stems from the generation of positive fixed charges after the annealing process of the 6 nm HfO2 layer [30,31]. To further investigate the electrical characteristics of both devices, the SS was extracted using the following equation:
S S = V G S log I D S   .
Figure 3c,d show the SS in the forward and reverse sweeps for both devices, exhibiting near 60 mV/dec, which is referred to as the Boltzmann limit, owing to the abrupt interface between the AlGaN and the 6 nm thick HfO2 layer [12]. For both devices, nearly 60 mV/dec SS was maintained for more than three orders of magnitude of IDS during the sweep. Figure 3e shows the output characteristic of devices A and NA measured for VGS ranging between −6 and 1 V with a 1 V step. Device A exhibited higher output currents than device NA for the same gate bias. In addition, the on-resistance (Ron) for variable VGS was extracted from the measured output curves to compare the Ron characteristics, as shown in Figure 3f. Initially, the Ron of device NA decreased as VGS increased, because of the channel conductivity enhancement. As VGS further increased, Ron saturated to a particular value, indicating that Ron was mainly limited by the resistance of the drift region. In contrast, device A exhibited a lower Ron, with negligible variation in the measured VGS range, owing to the enhanced channel conductivity, as observed earlier from the reduced Rsh, as well as negatively shifted VTH. These results show that spike-annealing can enhance electrical performance, such as lower Ron, which could contribute to high performance and low static power dissipation in RF applications. However, because charge trapping effects within different layers of the AlGaN/GaN HEMT structure can affect RF performance [32], further investigation of the interface quality of the HfO2/AlGaN interface is needed.
Figure 4a,b show the frequency-dependent capacitance–voltage (CV) curves of devices A and NA for comparison with the HfO2/AlGaN interface. A typical two-step response in the CV curves corresponding to 2DEG at the AlGaN/GaN interface and electrons accumulated at the AlGaN/HfO2 bilayer interface was observed. The first slope, which was formed by the AlGaN/GaN interface, exhibited a similar quality. Compared with device NA, device A exhibited a less dispersed oxide capacitance (Cox) at the second slope, owing to the further crystallization of the HfO2 layer (6 nm) after the annealing process. Figure 4c shows a comparison of the extracted Cox from the second slopes for a frequency range of 1 kHz to 1 MHz; the Cox of device A shows less frequency dependency. Based on the extracted Cox and amount of flat band voltage shift (ΔV) for device A, the calculated border trap densities (Nit) are presented in Figure 4d. Device A exhibits a higher Nit than device NA because of the oxide defects, including interface traps at the second HfO2 (6 nm)/HfO2 (10 nm) interface. During double-voltage sweeps, a high positive gate bias induces the capture and release of electrons by the traps at the second interface, owing to the increased dipole-induced band bending, which functions as an active trap [33]. The HfO2 bilayer of device A had a higher dipole density at the interface than the homogeneous HfO2 bilayer of device NA [23,30].
Subsequently, the conductance method was adopted to further investigate the interface traps at the first and second interfaces. The conductance method is based on measuring the normalized equivalent parallel conductance (Gp) of a MOS capacitor as a function of gate bias voltage and frequency, and it is extensively used to determine interface trap density (Dit) [34]. The AC conductance (Gm) and capacitance (Cm) from the CV measurements were used to calculate the normalized equivalent parallel conductance (Gp) as follows:
G P ω = ω G m C o x 2 G m 2 + ω 2 ( C o x 2 C m ) 2 ,
where Cox is the oxide capacitance and w is the angular frequency [19]. Figure 5a,b show the extracted Gp as a function of w for the first slope, while Figure 5c,d show the Gp corresponding to the second slope. Clearly, the Gp extracted from the second slope exhibits a discrepancy between devices A and NA. Device A shows a larger variation in the conductance peak, indicating electron trapping and detrapping at the AlGaN/HfO2 bilayer interface. The interface trap time constant (τT) and Dit were respectively determined by fitting the following equations to the Gp/w curves:
τ T = 1 ω = ( σ T N C ν T ) 1 e x p E C E T k T ,
D i t = G p ω p e a k × 1 + ( ω τ T ) 2 × 1 q ω τ T .
Figure 6a shows the calculated Dit as a function of ΔE, which is the difference between trap level energy (ET) and the conduction band energy (EC) [19]. Both devices exhibit a similar trend of shallow trap density corresponding to the AlGaN/GaN interface [15,23]. However, device A had a higher deep-trap density than device NA, indicating a higher trap density at the AlGaN/HfO2 bilayer induced by the additional annealing process [23]. Figure 6b shows the extracted shallow trap τT from the AlGaN/GaN interface; no discrepancies were observed between the two devices. However, the deep-trap density τT from the AlGaN/HfO2 bilayer exhibits a clear discrepancy; τT from device A is three times shorter than that from device NA for the studied VGS range, as shown in Figure 6c. The trap lifetime at the second interface of device A was shorter than that of device NA, which is attributed to the larger Dit of device A [19]. Since the highly crystallized HfO2 layer induced by spike-annealing increases the leakage current through the materials, more carriers in device A can penetrate the insulator from 2DEG and increase trapping probability. Consequently, the deep-trap density for device A is larger than device NA. Moreover, the increased dipole-induced band bending at the HfO2 interfaces in device A contributes to the activation of additional trap states [33], further shortening the trap lifetime. Although device A exhibits a superior static electrical performance, its increased trap density and shorter trap lifetime indicate that transient responses, including dynamic Ron, could be more affected by charge trapping effects in comparison with device NA. This result highlights the importance of optimizing the annealing process to balance both static and dynamic characteristics for switching applications [35]. Time constant and trap density can be changed by annealing processes, and thus they could be controlled by optimizing the conditions of spike-annealing [36].

4. Conclusions

In summary, we investigated a spike-annealed HfO2 (6 nm)/HfO2 (10 nm) bilayer gate dielectric for an AlGaN/GaN HEMT and compared it with a conventional HfO2 (6 nm)/HfO2 (10 nm) bilayer. Both devices exhibited negligible hysteresis and near-ideal (~60 mV/dec) SS for more than three orders of magnitude of IDS during the gate sweep, which is attributed to the high-quality AlGaN/HfO2 interface. According to the TLM analysis results, the annealed first HfO2 layer increased the carrier density in the 2DEG channel, and thus decreased Rsh from 783 to 544 Ω/□. Consequently, the device with the first annealed HfO2 layer exhibited a notably reduced Ron, with less gate bias dependency and enhanced output current compared with the conventional ALD-HfO2 layer. Unlike the enhanced overall electrical performance, the border trap density of the device with the first annealed HfO2 layer was determined to be inferior, owing to the increased dipole-induced band bending, which functions as an active trap, at the second HfO2 (6 nm)/HfO2 (10 nm) interface. Moreover, a higher interface trap density and shorter trap lifetime were verified using the conductance method. These results show that the first crystallized HfO2 (6 nm) layer, obtained via annealing, can enhance the channel conductivity, and other aspects of electrical performance. Further research on bilayer gate dielectric structures for AlGaN/GaN HEMTs is needed to avoid compromising the interface quality.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.L., J.Y., G.Y.; methodology, G.L., J.Y., M.J.Y., S.Y.; investigation, G.L., J.Y., M.J.Y., S.Y., G.Y.; data curation, G.L., J.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, G.L., J.Y., G.Y.; writing—review and editing, G.L., G.Y.; supervision, G.Y.; project administration, G.Y.; funding acquisition, G.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by KIAT (P0012451) and by a KEIT grant (RS-2022-00154729) funded by the Korea Government (MOTIE).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Authors appreciate Yeonsoo Jung for helping with the characterization.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Zhang, M.; Kong, Y.; Zhou, J.; Xue, F.; Li, L.; Jiang, W.; Hao, L.; Luo, W.; Zeng, H. Polarization and Interface Charge Coupling in Ferroelectric/AlGaN/GaN Heterostructure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 112902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yang, S.; Tang, Z.; Hua, M.; Zhang, Z.; Wei, J.; Lu, Y.; Chen, K.J. Investigation of SiNx and AlN Passivation for AlGaN/GaN High-Electron-Mobility Transistors: Role of Interface Traps and Polarization Charges. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 2020, 8, 358–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hashizume, T.; Nishiguchi, K.; Kaneki, S.; Kuzmik, J.; Yatabe, Z. State of the Art on Gate Insulation and Surface Passivation for GaN-Based Power HEMTs. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process 2018, 78, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ochi, R.; Maeda, E.; Nabatame, T.; Shiozaki, K.; Sato, T.; Hashizume, T. Gate Controllability of HfSiOx/AlGaN/GaN MOS High-Electron-Mobility Transistor. AIP Adv. 2020, 10, 065215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jones, E.A.; Wang, F.F.; Costinett, D. Review of Commercial GaN Power Devices and GaN-Based Converter Design Challenges. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top Power Electron. 2016, 4, 707–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Amano, H.; Baines, Y.; Beam, E.; Borga, M.; Bouchet, T.; Chalker, P.R.; Charles, M.; Chen, K.J.; Chowdhury, N.; Chu, R.; et al. The 2018 GaN Power Electronics Roadmap. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2018, 51, 163001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Saito, W.; Takada, Y.; Kuraguchi, M.; Tsuda, K.; Omura, I.; Ogura, T.; Ohashi, H. High Breakdown Voltage AlGaN-GaN Power-HEMT Design and High Current Density Switching Behavior. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2003, 50, 2528–2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Asahara, R.; Nozaki, M.; Yamada, T.; Ito, J.; Nakazawa, S.; Ishida, M.; Ueda, T.; Yoshigoe, A.; Hosoi, T.; Shimura, T.; et al. Effect of Nitrogen Incorporation into Al-Based Gate Insulators in AlON/AlGaN/GaN Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Structures. Appl. Phys. Express 2016, 9, 101002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ren, B.; Liao, M.; Sumiya, M.; Li, J.; Wang, L.; Liu, X.; Koide, Y.; Sang, L. Layered Boron Nitride Enabling High-Performance AlGaN/GaN High Electron Mobility Transistor. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 829, 154542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hoo Teo, K.; Zhang, Y.; Chowdhury, N.; Rakheja, S.; Ma, R.; Xie, Q.; Yagyu, E.; Yamanaka, K.; Li, K.; Palacios, T. Emerging GaN Technologies for Power, RF, Digital, and Quantum Computing Applications: Recent Advances and Prospects. J. Appl. Phys. 2021, 130, 160902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, S.; Liu, X.; Wei, K.; Huang, S.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, G.; Yuan, T.; Wang, X.; et al. Suppression of Gate Leakage Current in Ka-Band AlGaN/GaN HEMT with 5-Nm SiN Gate Dielectric Grown by Plasma-Enhanced ALD. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2021, 68, 49–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yeom, M.J.; Yang, J.Y.; Lee, C.H.; Heo, J.; Chung, R.B.K.; Yoo, G. Low Subthreshold Slope AlGaN/GaN MOS-HEMT with Spike-Annealed HfO2 Gate Dielectric. Micromachines 2021, 12, 1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fontserè, A.; Pérez-Tomás, A.; Godignon, P.; Millán, J.; De Vleeschouwer, H.; Parsey, J.M.; Moens, P. Wafer Scale and Reliability Investigation of Thin HfO2. AlGaN/GaN MIS-HEMTs. Microelectron. Reliab. 2012, 52, 2220–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chatterjee, S.; Kuo, Y.; Lu, J.; Tewg, J.Y.; Majhi, P. Electrical Reliability Aspects of HfO2 High-k Gate Dielectrics with TaN Metal Gate Electrodes under Constant Voltage Stress. Microelectron. Reliab. 2006, 46, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lu, X.; Yu, K.; Jiang, H.; Zhang, A.; Lau, K.M. Study of Interface Traps in AlGaN/GaN MISHEMTs Using LPCVD SiNx as Gate Dielectric. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2017, 64, 824–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nishimura, T.; Xu, L.; Shibayama, S.; Yajima, T.; Migita, S.; Toriumi, A. Ferroelectricity of Nondoped Thin HfO2 Films in TiN/HfO2/TiN Stacks. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2016, 55, 08PB01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cai, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, W.; Wen, H.; Mitrovic, I.Z.; Zhao, C. Effect of High-k Passivation Layer on High Voltage Properties of GaN Metal-Insulator-Semiconductor Devices. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 95642–95649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ando, Y.; Kaneki, S.; Hashizume, T. Improved Operation Stability of Al2O3/AlGaN/GaN MOS High-Electron-Mobility Transistors Grown on GaN Substrates. Appl. Phys. Express 2019, 12, 024002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lee, C.H.; Yang, J.Y.; Heo, J.; Yoo, G. Graded Crystalline HfO Gate Dielectric Layer for High-k/Ge MOS Gate Stack. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 2021, 9, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sang, X.; Grimley, E.D.; Schenk, T.; Schroeder, U.; Lebeau, J.M. On the Structural Origins of Ferroelectricity in HfO2 Thin Films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 162905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Masten, H.N.; Phillips, J.D.; Peterson, R.L. Effects of High Temperature Annealing on the Atomic Layer Deposited HfO2/β-Ga2O3(010) Interface. J. Appl. Phys. 2022, 131, 035106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shen, J.; Zhang, C.Y.; Xu, T.T.; Jiang, A.N.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Wang, S.; Chen, Q. Hysteresis-Free HfO2 Film Grown by Atomic Layer Deposition at Low Temperature. Thin Solid Films 2011, 519, 7723–7726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, J.Y.; Ma, J.; Lee, C.H.; Yoo, G. Polycrystalline/Amorphous HfO2 Bilayer Structure as a Gate Dielectric for β-Ga2O3MOS Capacitors. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2021, 68, 1011–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kim, J.G.; Lee, J.H.; Kang, D.M.; Lee, J.H. Improvement of Dynamic On-Resistance in GaN-Based Devices with a High-Quality In Situ SiN Passivation Layer. Micromachines 2023, 14, 1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kuzuhara, M.; Tokuda, H. Low-Loss and High-Voltage III-Nitride Transistors for Power Switching Applications. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2015, 62, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Stoklas, R.; Gregušová, D.; Hasenöhrl, S.; Brytavskyi, E.; Ťapajna, M.; Fröhlich, K.; Haščík; Gregor, M.; Kuzmík, J. Characterization of Interface States in AlGaN/GaN Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Heterostructure Field-Effect Transistors with HfO2 Gate Dielectric Grown by Atomic Layer Deposition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 461, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, L.; Zhang, L.; Sun, Y.; Wang, Y.; Gan, Z. Ohmic Contact Characteristic of Ti/Al/Ni/Au on AlGaN. In Proceedings of the 2019 20th International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology, ICEPT 2019, Hong Kong, China, 12–15 August 2019. [Google Scholar]
  28. Güneş, B.; Ghobadi, A.; Odabasi, O.; Bütün, B.; Özbay, E. Improved Drain Lag by Reduced Surface Current in GaN HEMT via an Ultrathin HfO2 Blanket Layer. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2023, 38, 065002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Choi, W.; Seok, O.; Ryu, H.; Cha, H.Y.; Seo, K.S. High-Voltage and Low-Leakage-Current Gate Recessed Normally-Off GaN MIS-HEMTs with Dual Gate Insulator Employing PEALD-SiNx/RF-Sputtered- HfO2. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2014, 35, 175–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, E.; Tung, Y.T.; Xiao, Z.R.; Shen, T.M.; Wu, J.; Diaz, C.H. Ab initio study of dipole-induced threshold voltage shift in HfO 2/Al2O3/(100) Si. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Workshop on Computational Electronics, IWCE 2014, Paris, France, 3–6 June 2014. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kang, H.Y.; Yeom, M.J.; Yang, J.Y.; Choi, Y.; Lee, J.; Park, C.; Yoo, G.; Kyu Chung, R.B. Epitaxial κ-Ga2O3/GaN Heterostructure for High Electron-Mobility Transistors. Mater. Today Phys. 2023, 31, 101002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gibiino, G.P.; Angelotti, A.M.; Santarelli, A.; Florian, C. Microwave Characterization of Trapping Effects in 100-nm GaN-on-Si HEMT Technology. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2019, 29, 604–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jin, F.-Y.; Chang, T.-C.; Lin, C.-Y.; Liao, J.-C.; Ciou, F.-M.; Lin, Y.-S.; Hung, W.-C.; Chang, K.-C.; Lin, Y.-H.; Chang, Y.-C.; et al. Abnormal Positive Bias Temperature Instability Induced by Dipole Doped N-Type MOSCAP. IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. 2019, 7, 897–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Schroder, D.K. Semiconductor Material and Device Characterization, 3rd ed.; Wiley-IEEE Press: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; ISBN 978-0-471-73906-7. [Google Scholar]
  35. Alemanno, A.; Anngelotti, A.M.; Gibiino, G.P.; Santarelli, A.; Sangiorgi, E.; Florian, C. A Reconfigurable Setup for the On-Wafer Characterization of the Dynamic RON of 600 V GaN Switches at Variable Operating Regimes. Electronics 2023, 12, 1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jun, L.; Zhao, S.L.; Mi, M.H.; Hou, B.; Yang, X.L.; Zhang, J.C.; Ma, X.H.; Hao, Y. Trap states induced by reactive ion etching in AlGaN/GaN high-electron-mobility transistors. Chin. Phys. B 2015, 24, 117305. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Cross-sectional schematic of the fabricated AlGaN/GaN MOS-HEMT with 6 nm/10 nm HfO2 bilayer. (b) Summarized fabrication process steps.
Figure 1. (a) Cross-sectional schematic of the fabricated AlGaN/GaN MOS-HEMT with 6 nm/10 nm HfO2 bilayer. (b) Summarized fabrication process steps.
Electronics 13 02783 g001
Figure 2. The IDS vs. VDS curves of (a) NA and (b) A device measured at TLM patterns with variable gap spacing from 4 to 10 μm. Rc, Rsh, and ρc for (c) NA and (d) device A, calculated based on the total resistance vs. gap spacing.
Figure 2. The IDS vs. VDS curves of (a) NA and (b) A device measured at TLM patterns with variable gap spacing from 4 to 10 μm. Rc, Rsh, and ρc for (c) NA and (d) device A, calculated based on the total resistance vs. gap spacing.
Electronics 13 02783 g002
Figure 3. Bidirectional IDS vs. VGS transfer curves in a (a) log and (b) linear scale. Extracted subthreshold slope (SS) for the (c) NA and (d) A device in forward (triangular) and reverse (square) directions at VDS = 1, 10 V, exhibiting near 60 mV/dec. (e) The output IDS vs. VDS curves for the VGS range of −6 V~1 V of the A and NA device. (f) Extracted on-resistance (Ron) as a function of VGS.
Figure 3. Bidirectional IDS vs. VGS transfer curves in a (a) log and (b) linear scale. Extracted subthreshold slope (SS) for the (c) NA and (d) A device in forward (triangular) and reverse (square) directions at VDS = 1, 10 V, exhibiting near 60 mV/dec. (e) The output IDS vs. VDS curves for the VGS range of −6 V~1 V of the A and NA device. (f) Extracted on-resistance (Ron) as a function of VGS.
Electronics 13 02783 g003
Figure 4. Frequency-dependent bidirectional capacitance–voltage (C-V) curves of devices (a) NA and (b) A for variable frequency ranges of 1 kHz~1 MHz. (c) Comparison of extracted Cox as a function of frequency. Cox was extracted at VG = 5.5 V. (d) The calculated border trap density (NT) using the specified equation on the plot.
Figure 4. Frequency-dependent bidirectional capacitance–voltage (C-V) curves of devices (a) NA and (b) A for variable frequency ranges of 1 kHz~1 MHz. (c) Comparison of extracted Cox as a function of frequency. Cox was extracted at VG = 5.5 V. (d) The calculated border trap density (NT) using the specified equation on the plot.
Electronics 13 02783 g004
Figure 5. Gp/ω as a function of measurement angular frequency (ω) obtained at various VG, extracted from the first slope for (a) NA and (b) A device. Gp/ω versus ω plots obtained from the second slope for (c) NA and (d) A device.
Figure 5. Gp/ω as a function of measurement angular frequency (ω) obtained at various VG, extracted from the first slope for (a) NA and (b) A device. Gp/ω versus ω plots obtained from the second slope for (c) NA and (d) A device.
Electronics 13 02783 g005
Figure 6. (a) Obtained Dit versus ΔE (EcEt) curves of AlGaN/GaN and AlGaN/HfO2 interfaces using the conductance method. Extracted interface trap time constants for the (b) AlGaN/GaN and (c) AlGaN/HfO2 interfaces extracted from the first and second slope, respectively.
Figure 6. (a) Obtained Dit versus ΔE (EcEt) curves of AlGaN/GaN and AlGaN/HfO2 interfaces using the conductance method. Extracted interface trap time constants for the (b) AlGaN/GaN and (c) AlGaN/HfO2 interfaces extracted from the first and second slope, respectively.
Electronics 13 02783 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, G.; Yang, J.; Yeom, M.J.; Yoon, S.; Yoo, G. Effects of a Spike-Annealed HfO2 Gate Dielectric Layer on the On-Resistance and Interface Quality of AlGaN/GaN High-Electron-Mobility Transistors. Electronics 2024, 13, 2783. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142783

AMA Style

Lee G, Yang J, Yeom MJ, Yoon S, Yoo G. Effects of a Spike-Annealed HfO2 Gate Dielectric Layer on the On-Resistance and Interface Quality of AlGaN/GaN High-Electron-Mobility Transistors. Electronics. 2024; 13(14):2783. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142783

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Gyuhyung, Jeongyong Yang, Min Jae Yeom, Sisung Yoon, and Geonwook Yoo. 2024. "Effects of a Spike-Annealed HfO2 Gate Dielectric Layer on the On-Resistance and Interface Quality of AlGaN/GaN High-Electron-Mobility Transistors" Electronics 13, no. 14: 2783. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142783

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop