Green Information Systems—A Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature from 2000 to 2023
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Data Collection
2.2. Research Methods and Tools
3. Results
3.1. Overall Research Overview
3.2. Impactful Journals, Authors, and Countries
3.3. Prolific and Impactful Documents
3.4. Trend Topics
- Ecology and environmental protection topics began to be primarily studied in the early part of the analysed period but persisted over time, with the median in 2001 and 2012, respectively.
- Information technology, innovation, management information systems, economics, environmental sustainability, and environmental impact topics gained prominence, especially during the period 2011–2017, highlighting interest in various aspects of green ISs, including technical, economic, and environmental considerations.
- Supply chain and design were in the spotlight between 2013 and 2018, with the median at the beginning of the period in 2014.
- Environmental technologies and resource-based views drew attention for a short period, approximately between 2012 and 2017.
- Energy utilization and efficiency and greenhouse gases are more specific issues associated with the development and use of hardware and software applications, and they were in focus during the period 2013–2020, indicating a growing interest in the correlation between digitalization and environmental issues.
- Sustainable development, environmental management, and competition are topics discussed more recently, in the period 2013–2020, with the median in 2017. Green ISs have thus been included in a broader topic of sustainable development from both economic and environmental perspectives.
- Behavioural research was associated with green ISs for a very short period, specifically 2016–2019.
- Climate change and green computing were among researchers’ concerns in the periods 2014 and 2015, respectively, and extended until 2021.
- Decision-making, information management, and information use drew attention around 2019, highlighting interest in a less technical aspect of ISs.
- IoT and decision theory complete the landscape of green IS research, being, alongside information management and information use, subjects that persist to the present.
3.5. Factorial Analysis
3.6. Thematic Analysis
3.7. Thematic Evolution from 2000–2012 to 2013–2023
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Seidel, S.; Chandra Kruse, L.; Székely, N.; Gau, M.; Stieger, D. Design principles for sensemaking support systems in environmental sustainability transformations. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2018, 27, 221–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Sun, Y.; Xing, C.; Liu, J.; He, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, G. Artificial intelligence powered large-scale renewable integrations in multi-energy systems for carbon neutrality transition: Challenges and future perspectives. Energy AI 2022, 10, 100195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tabor, D.P.; Roch, L.M.; Saikin, S.K.; Kreisbeck, C.; Sheberla, D.; Montoya, J.H.; Dwaraknath, S.; Aykol, M.; Ortiz, C.; Tribukait, H.; et al. Accelerating the discovery of materials for clean energy in the era of smart automation. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018, 3, 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maleki, R.; Asadnia, M.; Razmjou, A. Artificial Intelligence-Based Material Discovery for Clean Energy Future. Adv. Intell. Syst. 2022, 4, 2200073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Su, M. Integrating blockchain technology into the energy sector—From theory of blockchain to research and application of energy blockchain. Comput. Sci. Rev. 2020, 37, 100275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Necula, S. Assessing the Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Advancing Clean Energy Technologies in Europe: A Systematic Review. Energies 2023, 16, 7633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, M.; Sahu, G.P. Towards adoption of Green IS: A literature review using classification methodology. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 54, 102147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reich, R.H.; Ayan, J.; Alaerts, L.; Van Acker, K. Defining the goals of Product Passports by circular product strategies. Procedia CIRP 2023, 116, 257–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Huang, R. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on sustainable development goals—A survey. Environ. Res. 2021, 202, 111637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vailshery, L.S. Number of IoT Connected Devices Worldwide 2019–2023, with Forecasts to 2030. Statista Research Department. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1183457/iot-connected-devices-worldwide/ (accessed on 7 February 2024).
- Poleto, T.; Nepomuceno, T.C.; De Carvalho, V.D.; de Oliveira Friaes, L.C.; De Oliveira, R.C.; Figueiredo, C.J. Information Security Applications in Smart Cities: A Bibliometric Analysis of Emerging Research. Future Internet 2023, 15, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, X.; Wu, Y.; Niu, L.; Huang, L. Bibliometric Analysis of Health Technology Research: 1990–2020. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 9044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nguyen, H.S.; Danh, H.C.; Ma, Q.P.; Mesicek, J.; Hajnys, J.; Pagac, M.; Petru, J. A Bibliometrics Analysis of Medical Internet of Things for Modern Healthcare. Electronics 2023, 12, 4586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aria, M.; Cuccurullo, C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Informetr. 2017, 11, 959–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hirsch, J.E. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 16569–16572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Egghe, L. Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics 2006, 69, 131–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- von Bohlen und Halbach, O. How to judge a book by its cover? How useful are bibliometric indices for the evaluation of “scientific quality” or “scientific productivity”? Ann. Anat. 2011, 193, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gholami, R.; Sulaiman, A.B.; Ramayah, T.; Molla, A. Senior managers’ perception on green information systems (IS) adoption and environmental performance: Results from a field survey. Inf. Manag. 2013, 50, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, S.A.R.; Dong, Q. Impact of green supply chain management practices on firms’ performance: An empirical study from the perspective of Pakistan. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 16829–16844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gholami, R.; Watson, R.T.; Hasan, H.; Molla, A.; Bjorn-Andersen, N. Information systems solutions for environmental sustainability: How can we do more? J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2016, 17, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green, K.W.; Zelbst, P.J.; Bhadauria, V.S.; Meacham, J. Do environmental collaboration and monitoring enhance organizational performance? Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2012, 112, 186–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Jayaraman, V.; Paulraj, A.; Shang, K.C. Proactive environmental strategies and performance: Role of green supply chain processes and green product design in the Chinese high-tech industry. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2016, 54, 2136–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiefenbeck, V.; Goette, L.; Degen, K.; Tasic, V.; Fleisch, E.; Lalive, R.; Staake, T. Overcoming Salience Bias: How Real-Time Feedback Fosters Resource Conservation. Manag. Sci. 2018, 64, 1458–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rehman Khan, S.A.; Yu, Z. Assessing the eco-environmental performance: An PLS-SEM approach with practice-based view. Int. J. Logist. Res. 2021, 24, 303–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, S.A.; Godil, D.I.; Jabbour, C.J.; Shujaat, S.; Razzaq, A.; Yu, Z. Green data analytics, blockchain technology for sustainable development, and sustainable supply chain practices: Evidence from small and medium enterprises. Ann. Oper. Res. 2021, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- vom Brocke, J.; Watson, R.T.; Dwyer, C.; Elliot, S.; Melville, N. Green Information Systems: Directives for the IS Discipline. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2013, 33, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molla, A. GITAM: A Model for the Adoption of Green IT. In Proceedings of the 19th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Christchurch, Australia, 3–5 December 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y.; Pan, C.I.; Liao, H.T. Carbon Neutrality Policies and Technologies: A Scientometric Analysis of Social Science Disciplines. Front. Environ. Sci. 2021, 9, 761736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garfield, E. Historiographic Mapping of Knowledge Domains Literature. J. Inf. Sci. 2004, 30, 119–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parker, C.; Scheepers, R. Applying King et al.’s taxonomy to frame the IS discipline’s engagement in Green IS discourse. In Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Geelong, Australia, 3–5 December 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Ijab, M.T.; Molla, A.; Cooper, V.A. Theory of Practice-Based Analysis of Green Information Systems (Green IS) Use. In Proceedings of the 22nd Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Sydney, Australia, 30 November–2 December 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Scott, E.; McGibbon, C.; Mwalemba, G. Attempts to embed green values in the Information Systems curriculum: A case study in a South African setting. In Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Information Systems, Barcelona, Spain, 11–13 June 2020. [Google Scholar]
- McGibbon, C.; Van Belle, J.P. Integrating green information systems into the curriculum using a carbon footprinting case. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Management and Evaluation, Gdansk, Poland, 12–13 September 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Tushi, B.; Sedera, D.; Recker, J. Green IT segment analysis: An academic literature review. In Proceedings of the 20th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Savannah, GA, USA, 7–9 August 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Tooranloo, H.S.; Ashjerdi, S.R. Analyzing effective factors in Green information systems (ISs) adoption in health care centers using interpretive structural modeling. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Prod. Res. 2018, 29, 321–341. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Z.; Sun, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Cao, L. Employees’ collaborative use of green information systems for corporate sustainability: Motivation, effort and performance. Inf. Technol. Dev. 2017, 23, 486–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Warith, M.F. Assessment of Green IT/IS Within the Aviation Industry Using the Analytic Network Process Approach. Int. J. Hosp. Tour. Syst. 2019, 12, 13–24. [Google Scholar]
- McGibbon, C.; Van Belle, J.P. Integrating environmental sustainability issues into the curriculum through problem-based and project-based learning: A case study at the University of Cape Town. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2015, 16, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khor, K.S.; Thurasamy, R.; Ahmad, N.H.; Halim, H.A.; May-Chiun, L. Bridging the gap of green IT/IS and sustainable consumption. Glob. Bus. Rev. 2015, 16, 571–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oppong-Tawiah, D.; Webster, J.; Staples, S.; Cameron, A.F.; de Guinea, A.O. Encouraging sustainable energy use in the office with persuasive mobile information systems. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Information System, Auckland, New Zealand, 14–17 December 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Shevchuk, N.; Oinas-Kukkonen, H. Exploring green information systems and technologies as persuasive systems: A systematic review of applications in published research. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Information Systems, Dublin, Ireland, 11–14 December 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Bokolo, A. A Holistic Study on Green IT/IS Practices in ICT Departments of Collaborative Enterprise: A Managerial and Practitioners Perspective. Int. J. Soc. Ecol. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 11, 1–26. [Google Scholar]
- Hasan, H.; Meloche, J. Innovative ICT-mediated activities for people, profit and planet. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 2013, 16, 335–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seidel, S.; Bharati, P.; Fridgen, G.; Watson, R.T.; Albizri, A.; Boudreau, M.C.M.; Butler, T.; Kruse, L.C.; Guzman, I.; Karsten, H.; et al. The sustainability imperative in information systems research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2017, 40, 40–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Recker, J. Toward a design theory for green information systems. In Proceedings of the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kaloa, HI, USA, 5–8 January 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Muhammad, S.; Jusoh, Y.Y.; Din, J.; Nor, R.N. Green information systems design framework: A systematic literature review. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 2017, 95, 1338–1346. [Google Scholar]
- Reich, R.H.; Alaerts, L.; Van Acker, K. The Circular Economy as a requirement for smart information system designs. In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Workshop on Smart Circular Economy, Coral Bay, Pafos, Cyprus, 19–21 June 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, A.J.; Watson, R.T.; Boudreau, M.C.; Karahanna, E. Organizational adoption of green IS & IT: An institutional perspective. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 15–18 December 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Loeser, F. Green IT and Green IS: Definition of constructs and overview of current practices. In Proceedings of the 19th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Chicago, IL, USA, 15–17 August 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Radu, L.D. Green Information System for a Sustainable Enterprise. In Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Investments in the Green Economy; Andrei, J.V., Domenico, N., Eds.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2016; pp. 144–168. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.; Brooks, S.; Sarker, S. A Review of Green IS Research and Directions for Future Studies. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2015, 37, 395–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loock, C.M.; Landwehr, J.R.; Staake, T.; Fleisch, E.; Pentland, A.S. The influence of reference frame and population density on the effectiveness of social normative feedback on electricity consumption. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Information Systems, Orlando, FL, USA, 16–19 December 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt, N.H.; Erek, K.; Kolbe, L.M.; Zarnekow, R. Towards a Procedural Model for Sustainable Information Systems Management. In Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 5–8 January 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Goede, R. Sustainable business intelligence systems: Modelling for the future. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 2021, 38, 685–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valderrama, P.; Jiménez-Contreras, E.; Escabias, M.; Valderrama, M.J. Introducing a bibliometric index based on factor analysis. Scientometrics 2022, 127, 509–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spearman, C. ‘General intelligence’ objectively determined and measured. Am. J. Community Psychol. 1904, 15, 201–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cuccurullo, C.; Aria, M.; Sarto, F. Foundations and trends in performance management. A twenty-five years bibliometric analysis in business and public administration domains. Scientometrics 2016, 108, 595–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zampou, E.; Mourtos, I.; Pramatari, K.; Seidel, S. A design theory for energy and carbon management systems in the supply chain. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2022, 23, 329–371. [Google Scholar]
- Lawson, V.J.; Watson, R.T.; Ramaswamy, L. C-SenZ-IS: A customizable sensor IS model for energy efficient SaaS. In Proceedings of the 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, HI, USA, 5–8 January 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Pernici, B.; Ardagna, D.; Cappiello, C. Business process design: Towards service-based green information systems. In E-Government ICT Professionalism and Competences Service Science; Mazzeo, A., Bellini, R., Motta, G., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2008; pp. 195–203. [Google Scholar]
- Pejtersen, A.M. Design of ecological information systems for co-operative work. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, New York, NY, USA, 22–26 September 2008; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2000; Volume 44, pp. 583–586. [Google Scholar]
- Gottlieb, M.; Böhm, M.; Utesch, M.; Krcmar, H. Comparison of Reaction Times of a Visual and a Haptic Cue for Teaching Eco-Driving: An Experiment to Explore the Applicability of a Smartwatch. In Proceedings of the Challenges of the Digital Transformation in Education: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, Kos Island, Greece, 20 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Jung, D.; Schaule, E.; Weinhardt, C. Goal framing in smart charging—Increasing BEV users’ charging flexibility with digital nudges. In Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems: Information Systems for a Sharing Society, Stockholm, Sweden, 8–14 June 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Wacker, A.; Jurisch, M.; Jin, J.; Wolf, P.; Krcmar, H. Identifying Main User Groups for Green IS–An Empirical Study of Electric Vehicles in China. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Information Systems “Building a Better World Through Information Systems”, Auckland, New Zealand, 14–17 December 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Hwang, P.W.; Chen, C.H.; Chang, Y.J. A study on energy strategy of a plant factory using sustainable energy combined with computational fluid dynamics simulation: An innovative practice of green information systems. In Proceedings of the Computing Conference, London, UK, 18–20 July 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Kristoffer, R. Heterogeneities and complexities in IS design—Still a need to juxtapose organizational elements and design related ideas? In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group (CHISIG) of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction: Design—Interaction—Participation, Brisbane, Australia, 22–26 November 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Howard, G.R.; Lubbe, S.; Huisman, M. Green IS framework for environmental sustainability: A grounded theory approach in the South African banking sector. Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci. 2014, 5, 2462–2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brauer, B.; Kolbe, L. Towards IS-enabled Sustainable Communities–A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda. In Proceedings of the 22nd Americas Conference on Information Systems, San Diego, CA, USA, 11–14 August 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Moro, A.; Holzer, A. A framework to predict consumption sustainability levels of individuals. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dalvi-Esfahani, M.; Ramayah, T.; Nilashi, M. Modelling upper echelons’ behavioural drivers of Green IT/IS adoption using an integrated Interpretive Structural Modelling–Analytic Network Process approach. Telemat. Inform. 2017, 34, 583–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, F.; Ashfaq, M.; Begum, S.; Ali, A. How “Green” thinking and altruism translate into purchasing intentions for electronics products: The intrinsic-extrinsic motivation mechanism. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2020, 24, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esfahani, M.D.; Rahman, A.A. An integrative framework to understand the influence of morality on green is adoption: A theoretical perspective. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 2016, 88, 337–349. [Google Scholar]
- Bokolo, A.; Abdul Majid, M.; Romli, A. Case based reasoning for green information systems infusion and assimilation among IT professionals in university campuses. Sci. Iran. 2019, 26, 127–135. [Google Scholar]
- Mishra, A.; Yazici, A.; Mishra, D. Green information technology/information system education: Curriculum views. Tech. Technol. Educ. Manag. 2012, 7, 679–686. [Google Scholar]
- McDaniel, S.; Rylander, D. Strategic green marketing. J. Consum. Mark. 1993, 10, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vaccaro, V.L. B2B green marketing and innovation theory for competitive advantage. J. Syst. Inf. Technol. 2014, 11, 315–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, D. The adoption of green information technology and information systems: An evidence from corporate social responsibility. In Proceedings of the 18th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Chengdu, China, 24–28 June 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Nanath, K.; Pillai, R.R. The influence of green is practices on competitive advantage: Mediation role of green innovation performance. Inf. Syst. Manag. 2017, 34, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nishant, R.; Teo, T.S.; Goh, M. Sustainable information systems: Does it matter? In Proceedings of the 17th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, Nanchang, China, 9–12 July 2023.
- Wu, Z.; Yang, Z.; Sun, J.; Zou, Y. Alignment between Enterprise Green Supply Chain and Green Information System: An Analysis of Four Cases. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Bangkok, Thailand, 16–19 December 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Wungkana, F.; Siagian, H.; Tarigan, Z. The influence of eco-design, green information systems, green manufacturing, and green purchasing on manufacturing performance. Int. J. Data Netw. Sci. 2023, 7, 1054–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Curry, E.; Hasan, S.; Herstand, M.; O’Riain, S. An entity-centric approach to green information systems. In Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Information Systems—ICT and Sustainable Service Development, Helsinki, Finland, 9–11 June 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Curry, E.; Donnellan, B. Sustainable information systems and green metrics. In Harnessing Green IT: Principles and Practices; Murugesan, S., Gangadharan, G.R., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2012; pp. 167–198. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, H.M.; Kazman, R. Architecting ultra-large-scale green information systems. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Green and Sustainable Software, Zurich, Switzerland, 3 June 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, A.H. A model for environmentally sustainable information systems development. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2009, 49, 114–121. [Google Scholar]
- Houy, C.; Reiter, M.; Fettke, P.; Loos, P.; Hoesch-Klohe, K.; Ghose, A. Advancing business process technology for humanity: Opportunities and challenges of green BPM for sustainable business activities. In Green Business Process Management: Towards the Sustainable Enterprise; vom Brocke, J., Seidel, S., Recker, J., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2012; pp. 75–92. [Google Scholar]
- de Camargo Fiorini, P.; Jabbour, C.J. Information systems and sustainable supply chain management towards a more sustainable society: Where we are and where we are going. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2017, 37, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.; Sun, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y. Perceived fit between green IS and green SCM: Does it matter? Inf. Manag. 2019, 56, 103154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.; Sun, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y. Peas and carrots just because they are green? Operational fit between green supply chain management and green information system. Inf. Syst. Front. 2018, 20, 627–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sugathan, S.K.; Dominic, D.D.; Ramayah, T.; Ratnam, K.A. The associating factors and outcomes of green supply chain management implementation–from the technological and non-technological perspectives. In New Contributions in Information Systems and Technologies; Rocha, A., Correia, A., Costanzo, S., Reis, L., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 491–501. [Google Scholar]
- Cobo, M.J.; López-Herrera, A.G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F. Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2011, 62, 1382–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Necula, S.C.; Păvăloaia, V.D. AI-Driven Recommendations: A Systematic Review of the State of the Art in E-Commerce. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 5531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aria, M.; Misuraca, M.; Spano, M. Mapping the evolution of social research and data science on 30 years of Social Indicators Research. Soc. Indic. Res. 2020, 149, 803–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cobo, M.J.; López-Herrera, A.G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F. An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. J. Informetr. 2011, 5, 146–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mytton, D. Data centre water consumption. Clean Water 2021, 4, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Search Strategy | |
---|---|
Keywords | “green information system” OR “ecological information system” OR “sustainable information system” OR “clean information system” |
Database | Scopus |
Inclusion criteria | Search within the title, keywords, and abstract of the following document types: articles, conference papers, book chapters, reviews |
Exclusion criteria | Conference review, book, editorial, note, duplicate |
Period explored | 2000–2023 |
Language | English |
Description | Results |
---|---|
MAIN INFORMATION ABOUT DATA | |
Timespan | 2000:2023 |
Sources (journals, books, etc.) | 229 |
Documents | 318 |
Annual growth rate % | 8.48 |
Document average age | 7.64 |
Average citations per doc | 16.76 |
References | 15,334 |
DOCUMENT CONTENTS | |
Keywords plus (ID) | 1661 |
Author’s keywords (DE) | 887 |
AUTHORS | |
Authors | 704 |
Authors of single-authored docs | 41 |
AUTHORS COLLABORATION | |
Single-authored docs | 50 |
Co-authors per Doc | 3.02 |
International co-authorships % | 21.38 |
DOCUMENT TYPES | |
Article | 147 |
Book chapter | 18 |
Conference paper | 140 |
Review | 13 |
Journal | Total Citations | h-Index | g-Index | m-Index | No. of Publications |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Information and Management | 359 | 2 | 3 | 0.167 | 3 |
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 240 | 1 | 2 | 0.125 | 2 |
Communications of the Association for Information Systems | 228 | 5 | 8 | 0.417 | 8 |
Industrial Management and Data Systems | 193 | 2 | 2 | 0.154 | 2 |
Journal of the Association for Information Systems | 171 | 2 | 2 | 0.222 | 2 |
Information Systems Frontiers | 168 | 4 | 4 | 0.333 | 4 |
Information Systems Journal | 148 | 3 | 3 | 0.333 | 3 |
International Journal of Production Research | 144 | 1 | 1 | 0.111 | 1 |
Management Science | 137 | 1 | 1 | 0.143 | 1 |
International Journal of Information Management | 130 | 3 | 4 | 0.375 | 4 |
Author | No. of Articles | Total Citations | Research Topics Related to Green IS |
---|---|---|---|
Molla A. | 11 | 840 | social enterprise, environmental strategies, data centres, environmental performance, organizational motivations, environmental enterprise systems, green IS practices |
Sun J. | 10 | 166 | green supply chain, green culture and innovation, digital innovation, corporate sustainability, employees’ green behaviour |
Zhang Y. | 10 | 245 | green supply chain, corporate sustainability, green culture and innovation, employees’ green behaviour |
Yang Z. | 10 | 166 | green supply chain, digital innovation, corporate sustainability, green culture and innovation |
Wang Y. | 7 | 164 | green supply chain, digital innovation, corporate sustainability, green culture and innovation |
Corbett J. | 6 | 71 | strategies, machine learning, education, corporate sustainability, persuasive systems, smart grid |
Kolbe L.M. | 6 | 90 | sustainable communities, GHG emissions, sustainable information system management |
Kranz J. | 6 | 88 | pro-environmental behaviour, leadership, logistics, greenhouse emission |
Bokolo A. | 6 | 134 | green IS practices, green IS diffusion, education, corporate ecological responsibility, organizational performance |
McGibbon C. | 6 | 68 | education, green building, key drivers of green IS |
Country | No. of Articles | Total Citations | Int. Co-Authorship |
---|---|---|---|
Germany | 152 | 280 | 7.2% |
USA | 117 | 348 | 3.1% |
China | 79 | 741 | 7.2% |
Australia | 74 | 357 | 4.1% |
Malaysia | 41 | 240 | 2.8% |
Indonesia | 38 | 39 | 2.2% |
South Africa | 32 | 66 | 1.9% |
India | 30 | 71 | 3.1% |
United Kingdom | 29 | - | 1.6% |
Pakistan | 28 | 64 | 1.3% |
Article | Research Topics Related to Green IS | Global Citation Score |
---|---|---|
[18] | Green IS adoption, environmental performance, personality traits, institutional theory, coercive and mimetic pressure | 336 |
[19] | Green supply chain practices, organizational performance, eco-design processes, environmental performance | 239 |
[20] | Climate change, design science, IoT, green IS barriers | 161 |
[21] | Green supply chain management practices, organizational performance, environmental performance, environmental collaboration and monitoring | 153 |
[22] | Green product design, green supply chain processes, green purchasing and manufacturing, economic and environmental performance | 144 |
[23] | Energy conservation, decision-making, water conservation, environmental behaviour, behavioural changes, real-time feedback, policy intervention | 137 |
[24] | Green supply chain practices, competitive advantage, internal environment management, economic, environmental, and organizational performance | 121 |
[25] | Blockchain technology, sustainable and green supply chain, big data analytics, organizational performance, operational, environmental, and economic performance | 116 |
[26] | Business transformation, energy informatics, future development of IS discipline | 109 |
[27] | Green IT, corporate social responsibility, drivers of green IT, green IT readiness, green IT context | 101 |
Cluster | Callon Centrality | Callon Density | Rank Centrality | Rank Density | Cluster Frequency |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
sustainable development | 5.04 | 25.92 | 9 | 5 | 621 |
systems analysis | 0.13 | 33.22 | 3 | 8 | 37 |
ecology | 0.73 | 35.33 | 6 | 9 | 44 |
commerce | 0.56 | 24.21 | 4 | 3 | 23 |
innovation | 0.60 | 18.06 | 5 | 1 | 12 |
SCM | 2.14 | 29.04 | 8 | 6 | 109 |
sustainability | 0.89 | 30.23 | 7 | 7 | 73 |
developing countries | 0.10 | 20.00 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
information services | 0.00 | 25.00 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
From (2000–2012) | To (2013–2023) | Words | Weighted Inclusion Index | Inclusion Index | Stability Index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
management information systems | sustainable development | management information systems | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.01 |
design | sustainable development | design; design science | 0.75 | 0.33 | 0.01 |
information management | sustainable development | information management; environmental monitoring | 0.75 | 0.33 | 0.01 |
sustainable development | sustainable development | sustainable development; environmental sustainability; environmental impact; carbon dioxide; energy utilization; information use; global warming; research agenda | 0.66 | 0.06 | 0.01 |
business operation | motivation | business operation | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.05 |
business operation | sustainable development | sustainable business | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.01 |
health care | sustainable development | human-computer interaction; systems analysis | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.01 |
business process | environmental management | competition; green SCM | 0.38 | 0.25 | 0.03 |
ecology | sustainable development | ecology | 0.38 | 0.20 | 0.01 |
energy efficiency | sustainable development | energy efficiency | 0.38 | 0.33 | 0.01 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Radu, L.-D.; Popescul, D. Green Information Systems—A Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature from 2000 to 2023. Electronics 2024, 13, 1329. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13071329
Radu L-D, Popescul D. Green Information Systems—A Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature from 2000 to 2023. Electronics. 2024; 13(7):1329. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13071329
Chicago/Turabian StyleRadu, Laura-Diana, and Daniela Popescul. 2024. "Green Information Systems—A Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature from 2000 to 2023" Electronics 13, no. 7: 1329. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13071329
APA StyleRadu, L. -D., & Popescul, D. (2024). Green Information Systems—A Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature from 2000 to 2023. Electronics, 13(7), 1329. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13071329