A Cybercartographic Atlas of the Sky: Cybercartography, Interdisciplinary and Collaborative Work among the Pa Ipai Indigenous Families from Baja California, Mexico
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
I would suggest to elaborate more on the concept of Interdisciplinary and its instrumentation, as one of the key development lines of your methodology.
Your work could be improved by numbering the main sections of the article and introducing a scheme that helps better organize the description of the atlas. My advice is to avoid repetition and to revise image reference and source.
Moderate English changes are required. Look for comments in the pdf provided.
Please consider removing the fifth stage of the Atlas creation process, given that the information provided is confusing and does not add to the value of the entire exercise.
In general, the discussion and conclusion are consistent with the paper objective.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Point 1 I would suggest to elaborate more on the concept of Interdisciplinary and its instrumentation, as one of the key development lines of your methodology.
Response 1: I have modified the methodology, introducing a section about the interdisciplinary work carried out.
Point 2: Your work could be improved by numbering the main sections of the article and introducing a scheme that helps better organize the description of the atlas. My advice is to avoid repetition and to revise image reference and source.
Response 2: I have listed the main sections of the article. I also made an explanatory scheme of the descriptive part of the atlas. I removed the repeated images and placed the font of the main drawing.
Point 3: Moderate English changes are required. Look for comments in the pdf provided.
Response 3: I have made all the changes.
Point 4: Please consider removing the fifth stage of the Atlas creation process, given that the information provided is confusing and does not add to the value of the entire exercise.
Response 4: I have eliminated the fifth stage of the atlas.
Point 5: In general, the discussion and conclusion are consistent with the paper objective.
Response 5: Thank you very much for the comments.
Reviewer 2 Report
Cybercartography should be used and not Cyber- cartography or Cyber cartography.
Maybe use a Taylor quote for definition of Cybercartography rather than paraphrasing (note:
This paper shows a conscientious effort to include details regarding the research process.
Maybe some background on mapping with Indigenous Peoples in addition to discussion of research on the Pa Ipai (where cartography has its own colonial history and critical cartographies seek to transform this legacy)
Author Response
Point 1: Cybercartography should be used and not Cyber- cartography or Cyber cartography.
Response 1: I have substituted in the whole manuscript Cyber-cartography for Cybercartography.
Point 2: Maybe use a Taylor quote for definition of Cybercartography rather than paraphrasing (note:
Response 2: I have quoted the definition.
Point 3: This paper shows a conscientious effort to include details regarding the research process.
Response 3: Thank you very much.
Point 4: Maybe some background on mapping with Indigenous Peoples in addition to discussion of research on the Pa Ipai (where cartography has its own colonial history and critical cartographies seek to transform this legacy).
Response 4: I have added background on mapping with indigenous people.
Finally, I have modified what has been suggested in the commentaries of the PDF document.
Reviewer 3 Report
There are a few typos in the text the ones I have found are highlighted in yellow in the attached version of the manuscript.
1) There is no mention of Image 2 in the body of the manuscript.
2) There is no mention of Image 3 in the body of the manuscript.
3) There is no mention of Image 4 in the body of the manuscript.
4) There is a jump from Image 4 to Image 9 (it should be 5), not mentioned in the body of the manuscript as well.
5) There is no mention of Image 10 (it should be 6), in the body of the manuscript.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
There are a few typos in the text the ones I have found are highlighted in yellow in the attached version of the manuscript.
Point 1) There is no mention of Image 2 in the body of the manuscript.
Response 1) Now I mentioned it in the text.
Point 2) There is no mention of Image 3 in the body of the manuscript.
Response 2) Now I mentioned it in the text.
Point 3) There is no mention of Image 4 in the body of the manuscript.
Response 3). Now I mentioned it in the text.
Point 4) There is a jump from Image 4 to Image 9 (it should be 5), not mentioned in the body of the manuscript as well.
Response 4) I corrected this jump
Point 5) There is no mention of Image 10 (it should be 6), in the body of the manuscript.
Response 5) I corrected this mistake.
