Skip to Content
You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
  • 3.2
    Impact Factor
  • 6.7
    CiteScore
  • 35 days
    Submission to First Decision
  • 3 days
    Acceptance to Publication

ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information

ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information (IJGI) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal on geo-information, published monthly online. It is the official journal of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS). Society members receive discounts on the article processing charges.
  • Open Access— free for readers, with article processing charges (APC) paid by authors or their institutions.
  • High Visibility: indexed within Scopus, SCIE (Web of Science), GeoRef, PubAg, dblp, Astrophysics Data System, Inspec, and other databases.
  • Journal Rank: JCR - Q2 (Geography, Physical) / CiteScore - Q1 (Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous))
  • Rapid Publication: manuscripts are peer-reviewed and a first decision is provided to authors approximately 34.9 days after submission; acceptance to publication is undertaken in 2.9 days (median values for papers published in this journal in the first half of 2026).
  • Rejection Rate: a rejection rate of 74% in 2025.
  • Recognition of Reviewers: Reviewers whose reports are timely and of high quality receive an APC discount voucher for a future publication in an MDPI journal. Become a reviewer.

Get Alerted

Add your email address to receive forthcoming issues of this journal.

All Articles (6,241)

  • Article
  • Open Access

Accurate vessel trajectory prediction in complex nearshore waters remains challenging because local traffic patterns are highly heterogeneous and similar observed trajectories may lead to different future route continuations. Although historical Automatic Identification System (AIS) archives contain valuable evidence of previous vessel movements, such information is typically absorbed into model parameters rather than explicitly accessed during prediction. To address this limitation, this study proposes a spatially constrained memory-augmented framework for vessel trajectory prediction. An extensible key–value memory bank is constructed from paired representations of historical past and future trajectory segments. During prediction, geographically relevant candidates are first identified through spatial filtering, and the most similar historical trajectories are retrieved in the learned representation space. The corresponding future representations are then selectively aggregated with the current observed trajectory representation through an attention mechanism conditioned to generate the future trajectory. Experiments on AIS trajectories from the Pearl River Delta and adjacent coastal waters show that the proposed model consistently outperforms baselines over 60, 120, and 180 min horizons, with particularly clear improvements over the long short-term memory (LSTM) prediction backbone without historical trajectory fusion. Ablation results further confirm the effectiveness of spatially constrained retrieval and attention-based memory fusion, particularly for longer-horizon prediction.

ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf.

11 November 2026

Workflow of memory-augmented trajectory prediction after data processing.
  • Article
  • Open Access

Geospatial data contains abundant temporal, spatial, and attribute information related to geographic entities, serving as a critical foundation for the development of new quality productive forces. Achieving effective semantic representation of geographic features is a key prerequisite for enabling intelligent data analysis and application. Spatial relationships are an essential semantic characteristic of geographic features and are among the most commonly introduced characteristics for representation learning in recent studies. However, current research primarily focuses on point-based features (such as POIs) or on converting line and polygon features into point features, leading to inaccuracies in representing spatial proximity between features, which in turn affects the representation outcomes. In this paper, a feature unit delineation method based on geometric shapes is proposed to better construct the proximity relationship graph between features. It enriches the semantic features of feature units using a large language model and trains an edge optimization model to refine the graph structure. Building upon iGCL, a semantic representation learning model for geographic features is constructed. Finally, using Xiamen Island and Nanchang City as study areas, experimental datasets are built by integrating OSM and Amap (Gaode) POI data. The performance of the proposed model is validated and compared with other models through three tasks: semantic overlap calculation, node classification, and node clustering. The results show that the feature representations obtained by the proposed model achieve the best performance across all tasks, fully demonstrating its effectiveness and superiority in geographic feature representation learning, thereby providing a foundation for subsequent intelligent geographic feature tasks.

ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf.

11 November 2026

Framework of the method.
  • Review
  • Open Access

Location-based services (LBS) have traditionally helped users answer questions such as where to go or what is nearby. With the emergence of large language model (LLM)-based agents, LBS are beginning to move toward understanding open-ended goals, coordinating spatial tasks, and supporting decisions about what to do and how to do it. This review refers to LBS that integrate such agentic capabilities into location-dependent service processes as Agentic LBS. To systematically characterize the current state of Agentic LBS and identify directions for future research, we conducted a scoping review and proposed an Autonomy–Innovation–Experience (A-I-E) framework as its analytical lens. Following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), we searched the ACM Digital Library, Web of Science, and Scopus for peer-reviewed, English-language journal articles and conference papers published between 2021 and 2026. The search identified 228 records. After removing 21 duplicates, 207 records underwent screening, and 27 studies were included in the final review. The included studies were systematically charted and analyzed through descriptive mapping and qualitative coding to characterize their application directions, autonomy levels, innovation patterns, and user-experience implications. The results show that: (1) Agentic LBS research remains concentrated at lower autonomy levels, with 23 of the 27 studies (85.18%) classified as L1–L2 and four as L3; nevertheless, the emergence of L3 systems indicates a gradual movement toward more complex task planning and coordination. (2) LLM-based agents are expanding LBS beyond location-based information retrieval toward more personalized, context-aware, and task-oriented service delivery. (3) Reported user-experience benefits are concentrated in usability, accessibility, personalization, and task efficiency, whereas evidence concerning trust, user control, privacy, safety, and long-term use remains limited. (4) By synthesizing these findings across autonomy, innovation, and experience, this review proposes a future-oriented conceptual framework for understanding the emerging trajectory of Agentic LBS.

ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf.

10 November 2026

Research flow chart.
  • Article
  • Open Access

Driving simulation needs labeled 3D scenes, but mobile mapping system (MMS) light detection and ranging (LiDAR) is often delivered unclassified, without point-wise labels for training. We present a training-free pipeline that transfers the semantics of a vector high-definition (HD) map, the Korean precision road map, onto MMS LiDAR and outputs a labeled 0.5 m voxel scene, and we analyze what limits its accuracy. Each voxel takes the label of the nearest map feature whose category-specific radius and elevation window it satisfies, with elevations measured from a ground model built from the map’s 3D vertices. The pipeline needs no training data but requires a 3D vector map. On an expressway interchange, the ground model reached a median error of 6.6 cm, on par with inverse-distance weighting (IDW), triangulated irregular network (TIN), and local-plane interpolation. A blind, stratified random sample of 695 cells and a blind review of all 91 output objects showed that 98.0% [95.8, 99.5] of the output voxels are static solid structure and 73% [63, 81] of the objects are the mapped facility; the cell-level macro-F1 over six categories was 0.44 [0.39, 0.52] (guardrail 0.73, tunnel 0.94, sign 0.14). Errors were concentrated: four tunnel-mounted signals labeled the tunnel ceiling, and the radii of signs and posts captured roadside vegetation. The results show where map-based labels are reliable for simulation and which map content needs treatment.

ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf.

9 November 2026

Workflow. The map vertices give the ground model and the LiDAR gives the voxels; each cell takes the nearest map feature among the categories whose radius rc and elevation window (Equation (4)) it satisfies; if there is none, the cell stays unknown. Vehicle and retention filters and object grouping follow. Parallelograms are data; no model is trained or used. HD, high-definition; SHP, shapefile; MMS, mobile mapping system; LiDAR, light detection and ranging; ROI, region of interest.

Highly Accessed Articles

News & Conferences

Latest Issues

Open for Submission

Journal Sections

XFacebookLinkedIn
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. - ISSN 2220-9964