Mobile Cadastral Application with Open-Source Software in Colombia
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methodology
- Study of the current situation in the country, based on background information, examining existing data and collecting additional related information. Simultaneously, a bibliographic study is conducted, including national and international references, as well as a review of existing regulations in Colombia.
- Needs assessment and initial application design proposal.
- Qualitative social research, involving consultations with experts. Improvements are proposed throughout the design and development process.
- Architectural design and prototype development.
- Initial testing, with field trials conducted in Spain.
- Results and discussion.
- Conclusions.
2.1. Background—Initial Information, Collected Data, and Bibliographic Study
- CONPES 3859 of 2016: policy for the adoption and implementation of a multi-purpose rural–urban cadastre [49].
- CONPES 3958 of 2019: strategy for implementing the public policy on multi-purpose cadastres [50].
- Joint Resolution SNR N° 04218 and IGAC N° 499 of 2020: adoption of the Extended Cadastre-Registry Model of LADM_COL [51].
- Decree 148 of 2020: partial regulation of Articles 79, 80, 81, and 82 of Law 1955 of 2019, and partial modification of Title 2, Part 2, Book 2 of Decree 1170 of 2015 [52].
- Crowdsourcing: Crowdsourcing [53] refers to the practice of obtaining ideas, services, or work through the collaboration of a large group of people, often via the Internet [11,12]. This methodology is widely used across various fields, particularly in government and citizen participation functions, where websites or applications are employed to engage citizens in the creation of public policies, or the resolution of social problems [54,55]. Today, crowdsourcing has become a key tool in numerous sectors, leveraging collective knowledge and community skills to solve problems, innovate, or create [14].
- Fit-for-Purpose (FFP): The Fit-for-Purpose concept is used across various fields to describe systems or solutions, designed or adapted specifically to meet their intended purpose effectively [56]. In engineering, a Fit-for-Purpose system, or product, meets necessary requirements without excessive complexity or cost, maintaining a balance between quality, efficiency, and price [57,58,59,60]. In legislation, it refers to rules or regulations tailored to specific circumstances to achieve objectives without unnecessary restrictions. In project management, it denotes whether projects meet their objectives in terms of quality, timelines, and resources [18]. Specifically, in land administration and territorial planning, Fit-for-Purpose refers to systems that are efficient, accessible, and suitable for local needs, even if they do not meet advanced technical standards [61,62,63]. This approach is widely adopted in developing countries to formalise land ownership quickly and affordably [9,11,12,16,17,28,57,64].
2.2. Needs Assesment and Design Proposal
2.3. Qualitative Social Research
Socio-Demographic Characteristics, Previous Experiences, and Knowledge
2.4. Developed Prototype—Architecture
Description of the Use of the Developed Prototype
2.5. Developed Prototype Tests in Spain
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Prindex; Nizalov, D.; Langdown, I.; Childress, M.; Locke, A.; Kolodiazhnyi, I.; Burak, A. Comparative Report: Global Security of Property Rights the 2nd PRINDEX—Assessment of Perceived Tenure Security for Land and Housing Property from 108 Countries. PRINDEX 2024, 2, 1–70. [Google Scholar]
- Mesa de Conversaciones. Acuerdo Final para la Terminación del Conflicto y la Construcción de una Paz Estable y Duradera; 2018; Volume 2, pp. 1–189. Available online: https://www.jep.gov.co/Documents/Acuerdo%20Final/Acuerdo%20Final.pdf (accessed on 11 January 2025).
- Fernández-Osorio, A.E.; Pachón Pinzón, R.d.P.P. Perspectives in Colombia: Characterizing the 2016 Peace Agreement with the FARC. Rev. Relac. Int. Estrateg. Y Segur. 2019, 14, 31–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Femenia-Ribera, C.; Mora-Navarro, G.; Avendaño Arias, J.; Arcediano Rey, J. Comparando El Sistema de Administración Del Territorio Entre España y Colombia. Mapping 2024, 33, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williamson, I.; Enemark, S.; Wallace, J.; Rajabifard, A. Land Administration for Sustainable Development. Redlands: ESRI. FIG Congr. 2010, 2010, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Serrano, J.A.S. Inequality in the Distribution of Land in Colombia: Main Obstacle to a Lasting and Democratic Peace. An. Geogr. Univ. Complut. 2018, 38, 409–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cabrera Suárez, L.A. Evolución de Los Modelos Jurídicos Aplicados En La Formalización de La Propiedad Rural, En Particular En El Proceso de Titulación de Baldíos Rurales En Colombia. DIXI 2019, 20, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Camacho, C.; Toledo, M. Land Formalization: Key to Agricultural Productivity in Colombia 2024. Available online: https://www.caf.com/en/blog/land-formalization-key-to-agricultural-productivity-in-colombia/ (accessed on 11 January 2025).
- Koeva, M.; Crommelinck, S.; Stöker, C.; Crompvoets, J.; Ho, S.; Buntinx, I.; Schwering, A.; Chipofya, M.; Jan, S.; Zein, T.; et al. Its4land—Developing Innovative Geospatial Tools for Fit-for-Purpose Land Rights Mapping. Coordinates 2018, 14, 31–38. [Google Scholar]
- Shankar Panday, U.; Chhatkuli, R.; Joshi, J.R.; Deuja, J.; Antonio, D.; Enemark, S. Securing Land Rights for All through Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration Approach: The Case of Nepal. Land 2021, 10, 744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aditya, T.; Maria-Unger, E.; vd Berg, C.; Bennett, R.; Saers, P.; Syahid, H.L.; Erwan, D.; Wits, T.; Widjajanti, N.; Santosa, P.B.; et al. Participatory Land Administration in Indonesia: Quality and Usability Assessment. Land 2020, 9, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gkeli, M.; Apostolopoulos, K.; Mourafetis, G.; Ioannidis, C.; Potsiou, C. Crowdsourcing and Mobile Services for a Fit-For-Purpose Cadastre in Greece. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation of the Environment (RSCy2016), Paphos, Cyprus, 4–8 April 2016; Themistocleous, K., Hadjimitsis, D.G., Michaelides, S., Papadavid, G., Eds.; SPIE: Washington, DC, USA, 2016; Volume 9688, p. 968817. [Google Scholar]
- Basiouka, S.; Potsiou, C. The Volunteered Geographic Onformation in Cadastre: Perspectives and Citizens’ Motivations Over Potential Participation in Mapping. GeoJournal 2014, 79, 343–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Apostolopoulos, K.; Geli, M.; Petrelli, P.; Potsiou, C.; Ioannidis, C. A New Model for Cadastral Surveying Using Crowdsourcing. Surv. Rev. 2018, 50, 122–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mourafetis, G.; Potsiou, C. IT Services and Crowdsourcing in Support of the Hellenic Cadastre: Advanced Citizen Participation and Crowdsourcing in the Official Property Registration Process. ISPRS Int. J. Geoinf. 2020, 9, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mekking, S.; Kougblenou, D.V.; Kossou, F.G. Fit-For-Purpose Upscaling Land Administration—A Case Study from Benin. Land 2021, 10, 440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams-Wynn, C. Applying the Fit-For-Purpose Land Administration Concept to South Africa. Land 2021, 10, 602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halim, N.Z.A.; Chan, K.L. SmartKADASTER Interactive Portal (SKiP), Is It Fit-For-Purpose? IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 540, 012025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CCASAT UPV Proyecto MetaTierras Colombia. Available online: https://metatierrascol.upvusig.car.upv.es/home (accessed on 20 November 2024).
- UPV Universitat Politècnica de València, UPV, Spain. Available online: http://www.upv.es (accessed on 19 November 2024).
- FFF Fundación Forjando Futuros, FFF, Colombia. Available online: https://www.forjandofuturos.org (accessed on 20 November 2024).
- Enemark, S.; Bell, K.C.; Lemmen, C.; McLaren, R. Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration; FIG Publication 60: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2014; ISBN 9788792853103. [Google Scholar]
- Koeva, M.; Bennett, R.; Persello, C. Remote Sensing for Land Administration 2.0. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 4359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mora-Navarro, G.; Femenia-Ribera, C.; Velilla Torres, J.M.; Martinez-Llario, J. Geographical Data and Metadata on Land Administration in Spain. Land 2022, 11, 1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verdu-Candela, A.; Femenia-Ribera, C.; Mora-Navarro, G.; Sierra-Requena, R. Implementation of Web Map Services for Old Cadastral Maps. ISPRS Int. J. Geoinf. 2023, 12, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koeva, M.; Gasuku, O.; Lengoiboni, M.; Asiama, K.; Bennett, R.M.; Potel, J.; Zevenbergen, J. Remote Sensing for Property Valuation: A Data Source Comparison in Support of Fair Land Taxation in Rwanda. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, M.A.; Stubkjær, E. A Review of Methodologies Used in Research on Cadastral Development. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2002, 26, 403–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Todorovski, D.; Salazar, R.; Jacome, G.; Mclaren, R.; Lemmen, C. Assessment of Land Administration in Ecuador Based on the Fit-For-Purpose Approach. Land 2021, 10, 862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muthama, D.M.; Barry, M.; Ballantyne, B. Improving Land Tenure Administration Effectiveness in a Post-Conflict Peri-Urban Mombasa Settlement. Urban Forum. 2020, 31, 237–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdullah, N.M.; Omar, A.H.; Yaakob, O. Today’s Problem, Tomorrow’s Solutions: Lay Theory Explanations of Marine Space Stakeholder Management in the Malaysian Context. Mar. Policy 2016, 73, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chekole, S.D.; de Vries, W.T.; Durán-Díaz, P.; Shibeshi, G.B. Performance Evaluation of the Urban Cadastral System in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Land 2020, 9, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hull, S.; Liversage, H.; Rizzo, M.P.; Evtimov, V. An Overview of Frontier Technologies for Land Tenure: How to Avoid the Hype and Focus on What Matters. Land 2022, 11, 1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okembo, C.; Lemmen, C.; Kuria, D.; Zevenbergen, J. Developing an Adapted Land Administration Domain Model Profile for Kenya. Land Use Policy 2022, 117, 106087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velilla Torres, J.M. Pruebas de Inscripción de Representaciones Gráficas en España, y Estudio y Creación de Herramientas Técnicas para la Aplicación del LADM en Colombia; Universidad Politécnica de Valencia: Valencia, Spain, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- IGAC Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi—IGAC, Colombia. Available online: https://www.igac.gov.co/ (accessed on 11 January 2025).
- ANT Agencia Nacional de Tierras—ANT, Colombia. Available online: https://www.ant.gov.co/ (accessed on 8 October 2024).
- SNR Superintendencia de Notariado y Registro—SNR, Colombia. Available online: https://www.supernotariado.gov.co/ (accessed on 8 October 2024).
- Presidencia de Colombia; Banco Mundial; Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo; Kadaster Internacional de los Paises Bajos en Colombia; Secretaría de Estado para Asuntos Económicos de la Confederación Suiza (SECO); Agencia de Estados Unidos para el Desarrollo Internacional (USAID) en Colombia. Catastro Multipropósito Como Herramienta de Construcción de Paz; Consejeria Presidencial Para La Gestion Y El Cumplimiento: Bogotá, Colombia, 2021. Available online: https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/277107597/Catastro_Multiprop_sito.pdf (accessed on 11 January 2025).
- Realtech LTDA GeoLand. Available online: https://geoland.com.co/app/ (accessed on 20 November 2024).
- Kadaster Internacional de los Países Bajos en Colombia Land in Peace, Tierra En Paz. Available online: https://tierraenpaz.com/ (accessed on 20 November 2024).
- Molendijk, M. Métodos Alternativos Para Una Rápida y Efectiva Administración de La Tierra En Escenarios de Construcción de Paz. Rev. Ing. 2018, 46, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rocha, L.A.; Ortiz Dávila, A.E.; Suárez, E. Introducción de Metodologías Participativas en la Modernización de la Administración de Tierras en Colombia Acercando la Tecnología a la Comunidad. Iber. J. Inf. Syst. Technol. 2019, E17, 775–786. [Google Scholar]
- Becerra, L.; Molendijk, M.; Porras, N.; Spijkers, P.; Reydon, B.; Morales, J. Fit-For-Purpose Applications in Colombia: Defining Land Boundary Conflicts between Indigenous Sikuani and Neighbouring Settler Farmers. Land 2021, 10, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rocha, L.A.; Montoya, J.; Ortiz, A. Quality Assurance for Spatial Data Collected in Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration Approaches in Colombia. Land 2021, 10, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Núcleo de Investigación de Datos Espaciales—NIDE Metodología “Fit for Purpose”—FFP “Ajustado al Propósito”; Cartilla, Proyecto de investigación; Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas: Bogotá, Colombia, 2019.
- Swiss Tierras Colombia; Embajada de Suiza en Colombia Cooperación Económica y Desarrollo (SECO). Proyecto Swiss Tierras. Available online: https://www.eda.admin.ch/deza/es/home/paises/colombia.html/content/dezaprojects/SECO/en/2013/UR00631/phase2 (accessed on 11 January 2025).
- Swiss Tierras Colombia; Catastro Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi, Git Lab. Repositorio Oficial Del Modelo de Datos LADM-COL. Available online: https://gitlab-ladm-col.igac.gov.co/root/LADM_COL (accessed on 11 January 2025).
- Swiss Tierras; Embajada de Suiza en Colombia Cooperación Económica y Desarrollo (SECO); Git Hub, Git Hub 2020; Repositorio de Versionado Del Modelo LADM-COL. Available online: https://github.com/SwissTierrasColombia/LADM_COL (accessed on 11 January 2025).
- Santos Calderón, J.M.; Cristo Bustos, J.F.; Cárdenas Santamaría, M.; Londoño Ulloa, J.E.; Villegas Echeverri, C.; Iragorri Valencia, L.A.; Gaviria Uribe, A.; Obregón, L.; Germán Arce Zapata, C.; Lacouture Pinedo, M.C.; et al. Política Para la Adopción e Implementación de un Catastro Multipropósito Rural-Urbano. In Consejo Nacional de Política Económica y Social—CONPES 3859; CONPES: Bogotá, Colombia, 2016; pp. 1–86. [Google Scholar]
- Lucía, M.; Blanco, R.; Patricia, N.; Castañeda, G.; Holmes, C.; García, T.; Barrera, A.C.; María, G.; Restrepo, B.; Nieto, G.B.; et al. Estrategia Para la Implementación de la Política Pública de Catastro Multipropósito. In Consejo Nacional de Política Económica y Social—CONPES 3958; CONPES: Bogotá, Colombia, 2019; pp. 1–79. [Google Scholar]
- Resolución Conjunta, Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi No. 499 Superintendencia de Notariado y Registro No. 04218: “Por la cual se Adopta el Modelo Extendido de Catastro Registro del Modelo LADM_COL”; Superintendencia de Notariado y Registro, Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi: Barranquilla, Colombia, 2020.
- Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística—DANE. DANE—Decreto 148 de 2020: “Por el cual se Reglamentan Parcialmente los Artículos 79, 80, 81 y 82 de la Ley 1955 de 2019 y se Modifica Parcialmente el Título 2 de la Parte 2 del Libro 2 del Decreto 1170 de 2015; DANE: Bogotá, Colombia, 2020; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
- Heipke, C. Crowdsourcing Geospatial Data. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2010, 65, 550–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ekpodessi, S.G.N.; Nakamura, H. Impact of Insecure Land Tenure on Sustainable Agricultural Development: A Case Study of Agricultural Lands in the Republic of Benin, West Africa. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Estellés-Arolas, E.; González-Ladrón-de-Guevara, F. Towards an Integrated Crowdsourcing Definition. J. Inf. Sci. 2012, 38, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Enemark, S.; Mclaren, R.; Lemmen, C. Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration—Providing Secure Land Rights at Scale. Land 2021, 10, 972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Metaferia, M.T.; Bennett, R.M.; Alemie, B.K.; Koeva, M. Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration and the Framework for Effective Land Administration: Synthesis of Contemporary Experiences. Land 2023, 12, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koeva, M.; Humayun, M.I.; Timm, C.; Stöcker, C.; Crommelinck, S.; Chipofya, M.; Bennett, R.; Zevenbergen, J. Geospatial Tool and Geocloud Platform Innovations: A Fit-For-Purpose Land Administration Assessment. Land 2021, 10, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taiwo, I.O.; Ibitoye, M.O.; Oladejo, S.O.; Koeva, M. Fitness of Multi-Resolution Remotely Sensed Data for Cadastral Mapping in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 3670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taiwo, I.O.; Ibitoye, O.M.; Oladejo, S.O. Comparison Between Aerial Imagery and Conventional Cadastral Mapping Methods in Ekiti State Nigeria; Towards a Fit-For-Purpose Approach. Surv. Rev. 2024, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casiano Flores, C.; Tan, E.; Buntinx, I.; Crompvoets, J.; Stöcker, C.; Zevenbergen, J. Governance Assessment of the UAVs Iimplementation in Rwanda Under the Fit-For-Purpose Land Administration Approach. Land Use Policy 2020, 99, 104725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chigbu, U.E.; Bendzko, T.; Mabakeng, M.R.; Kuusaana, E.D.; Tutu, D.O. Fit-For-Purpose Land Administration from Theory to Practice: Three Demonstrative Case Studies of Local Land Administration Initiatives in Africa. Land 2021, 10, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bennett, R.M.; Koeva, M.; Asiama, K. Review of Remote Sensing for Land Administration: Origins, Debates, and Selected Cases. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 4198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Metaferia, M.T.; Bennett, R.M.; Alemie, B.K.; Koeva, M. Furthering Automatic Feature Extraction for Fit-For-Purpose Cadastral Updating: Cases from Peri-Urban Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 4155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forjando Futuros Foundation MetaTierras, Una Aplicación Móvil Para Avanzar En La Reforma Agraria. Available online: https://www.forjandofuturos.org/metatierras-una-aplicacion-movil-para-avanzar-en-la-reforma-agraria/ (accessed on 24 September 2024).
- Stöcker, C.; Nex, F.; Koeva, M.; Gerke, M. High-Quality Uav-Based Orthophotos for Cadastral Mapping: Guidance for Optimal Flight Configurations. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas. Available online: https://www.udistrital.edu.co/inicio (accessed on 11 January 2025).
- Mora-Navarro, G. MetaTierras Colombia Web. Available online: https://metatierrascol.upvusig.car.upv.es/ (accessed on 24 September 2024).
- Mwamba, G.; Mony, V.; Mbugua, S. Architectural Review of Client-Server Models. Int. J. Sci. Res. Eng. Trends 2024, 10, 2395–2566. [Google Scholar]
- Rossi, B.; Russo, B.; Succi, G. Adoption of Free/Libre Open Source Software in Public Organizations: Factors of Impact. Inf. Technol. People 2012, 25, 156–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sánchez, V.R.; Ayuso, P.N.; Galindo, J.A.; Benavides, D. Open Source Adoption Factors—A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 94594–94609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fuggetta, A. Open Source Software—An Evaluation. J. Syst. Softw. 2003, 66, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mora-Navarro, G. MetaTierras Web. Available online: https://github.com/joamona/metatierrascol-web (accessed on 24 September 2024).
- Mora-Navarro, G.; Terevinto Charquero, D. MetaTierras App. Available online: https://github.com/joamona/metatierrascol-app (accessed on 24 September 2024).
- Plan Nacional de Ortofotografía Aérea (PNOA). Available online: https://pnoa.ign.es/ (accessed on 11 January 2025).
- Jurdak, R.; Corke, P.; Cotillon, A.; Dharman, D.; Crossman, C.; Salagnac, G. Energy-Efficient Localization: GPS Duty Cycling with Radio Ranging. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 2013, 9, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Congreso de Colombia. Plan Nacional de Desarrollo de Colombia 2022–2026; Gobierno de Colombia: Bogota, Colombia, 2023; pp. 33–43. [Google Scholar]
Name | Surname | Position | LA Experience in Colombia (Years) |
---|---|---|---|
Adriana Marcela | Muñoz Vásquez | National Land Environment Commissioner | 24 |
Diego | Carrero Barón | IGAC Deputy Director General | 9 |
Gerardo | Vega | Land Claim Defender | 32 |
Jaime Alberto | Duarte Castro | Coordinator of the Aqueduct and Sewage Cadastre of Panama | 20 |
José Agustín | Wilches Gómez | President of the Colombian Chamber of Topography, and Entrepreneur | 30 |
Leonardo | Cardona | Colombian Consulting and Engineering (Company) | 7 |
Luz Angela | Rocha | Researcher and lecturer in the Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas [67] | 22 |
Oscar | Mahecha | Legal representative of the Oversight Office of the Colombian Chamber of Topography | 30 |
Ruth Elena | Acuña | President of the Permanent Technical Commission of Geomatics of the Colombian Society of Engineers | 30 |
Wilson | Pérez | National Land Environment Commissioner | 12 |
Total Participants | Age Range | Average Age | Gender Distribution | Educational Level | Average Experience | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Men | Women | Master’s Degree | Ph.D. | ||||
10 | 35–67 | 56.3 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 21.6 |
FFP Implementation | MetaTierras Project Design | |
---|---|---|
Advantages | - Facilitates local involvement - Streamlines cadastral processes - Positive impact on the population’s perception of the cadastre - Increasing confidence in cadastral processes | - Interest in learning and testing the tool - Ability to integrate with existing processes |
Challenges | - Training of users and technicians - Providing greater confidence and rigour | - Improve the accuracy with which it operates |
Implications | - Technical: Integration with existing processes - Educational: Staff training - Political: Long-term cadastral planning - Social: Outreach strategies | |
Recommendations | - Test in different contexts - Technical capacity building in communities |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Published by MDPI on behalf of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Mora-Navarro, G.; Femenia-Ribera, C.; Terol, E.; Quiza-Neuto, C. Mobile Cadastral Application with Open-Source Software in Colombia. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2025, 14, 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14030096
Mora-Navarro G, Femenia-Ribera C, Terol E, Quiza-Neuto C. Mobile Cadastral Application with Open-Source Software in Colombia. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2025; 14(3):96. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14030096
Chicago/Turabian StyleMora-Navarro, Gaspar, Carmen Femenia-Ribera, Enric Terol, and Cristhian Quiza-Neuto. 2025. "Mobile Cadastral Application with Open-Source Software in Colombia" ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 14, no. 3: 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14030096
APA StyleMora-Navarro, G., Femenia-Ribera, C., Terol, E., & Quiza-Neuto, C. (2025). Mobile Cadastral Application with Open-Source Software in Colombia. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 14(3), 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14030096