Next Article in Journal
Mapping Urban Spatial Structure Based on POI (Point of Interest) Data: A Case Study of the Central City of Lanzhou, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Combining Satellite Remote Sensing and Climate Data in Species Distribution Models to Improve the Conservation of Iberian White Oaks (Quercus L.)
Previous Article in Journal
Open Geospatial Software and Data: A Review of the Current State and A Perspective into the Future
Previous Article in Special Issue
Urban Ecological Corridor Network Construction: An Integration of the Least Cost Path Model and the InVEST Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

GIS-Based Assessment of Habitat Networks for Conservation Planning in Kas-Kekova Protected Area (Turkey)

1
Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, General Directorate for Protection of Natural Assets, Cankaya, 06530 Ankara, Turkey
2
Department of Geomatics Engineering, Konya Technical University, 42075 Konya, Turkey
3
Department of Geomatics Engineering, Hacettepe University, 06800 Ankara, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9(2), 91; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020091
Submission received: 23 December 2019 / Revised: 19 January 2020 / Accepted: 27 January 2020 / Published: 1 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of GIS for Biodiversity Research)

Abstract

The determination of protected area (PA) boundaries and the level of restrictions is very important for sustainable conservation, and such decisions must involve biodiversity data and assessment. In a PA, the consensus of the government and the locals is crucial to ensure protection–use balance. The PA restrictions constrain legal human activities, and the boundary determination and the restrictions should be based on various scientific analyses to achieve consensus. In this study, a GIS-based approach is proposed to utilize the biodiversity data for efficient conservation and land use planning in Kas-Kekova PA, which is among the most important PAs in Turkey. Spatial analysis methods, i.e., kernel density estimation, natural breaks classification and integrated density index, were performed for the assessment of the habitat networks using georeferenced biodiversity datasets, and the results were evaluated with respect to the actual land use data and the land ownership pattern. The developed spatial analysis approach is efficient to produce the conservation base maps required for regional land use planning, for defining sustainable conservation strategies, and to provide a widely accepted base for land use planning and biodiversity monitoring in the PA; although careful investigations and expert opinions are still required for data deficient areas.
Keywords: Conservation planning; Aichi target 11; protected area network; geographical information systems; kernel density estimation; Kas-Kekova Turkey Conservation planning; Aichi target 11; protected area network; geographical information systems; kernel density estimation; Kas-Kekova Turkey

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tezel, D.; Inam, S.; Kocaman, S. GIS-Based Assessment of Habitat Networks for Conservation Planning in Kas-Kekova Protected Area (Turkey). ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020091

AMA Style

Tezel D, Inam S, Kocaman S. GIS-Based Assessment of Habitat Networks for Conservation Planning in Kas-Kekova Protected Area (Turkey). ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2020; 9(2):91. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020091

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tezel, Dilek, Saban Inam, and Sultan Kocaman. 2020. "GIS-Based Assessment of Habitat Networks for Conservation Planning in Kas-Kekova Protected Area (Turkey)" ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 9, no. 2: 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020091

APA Style

Tezel, D., Inam, S., & Kocaman, S. (2020). GIS-Based Assessment of Habitat Networks for Conservation Planning in Kas-Kekova Protected Area (Turkey). ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(2), 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020091

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop