Next Article in Journal
Scientific Papers by Developmental Biologists in Japan
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling Podocyte Ontogeny and Podocytopathies with the Zebrafish
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JDB
Volume 11
Issue 1
10.3390/jdb11010010
jdb-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Vitro Comparison of Sex-Specific Splicing Efficiencies of fem Pre-mRNA under Monoallelic and Heteroallelic Conditions of csd, a Master Sex-Determining Gene in the Honeybee

by
Yukihiro Suzuki
1,
Takafumi Yamada
2 and
Masataka G. Suzuki
3,*
1
INTERSTELLAR Inc., 301 Unico A, 3-4 Nisshin-cho, Kawasaki-ku, Kawasaki 210-0024, Kanagawa, Japan
2
YAMADA-KUN’S Bee Farm, 95 Ochino, Mugegawa, Seki 501-2602, Gifu, Japan
3
Division of Biological Sciences, Department of Integrated Biosciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 302 Bioscience-Bldg, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa 277-8562, Chiba, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Dev. Biol. 2023, 11(1), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb11010010
Submission received: 11 February 2023 / Revised: 5 March 2023 / Accepted: 8 March 2023 / Published: 10 March 2023
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The sexual fate of honeybees is determined by the complementary sex determination (CSD) model: heterozygosity at a single locus (the CSD locus) determines femaleness, while hemizygosity or homozygosity at the CSD locus determines maleness. The csd gene encodes a splicing factor that regulates sex-specific splicing of the downstream target gene feminizer (fem), which is required for femaleness. The female mode of fem splicing occurs only when csd is present in the heteroallelic condition. To gain insights into how Csd proteins are only activated under the heterozygous allelic composition, we developed an in vitro assay system to evaluate the activity of Csd proteins. Consistent with the CSD model, the co-expression of two csd alleles, both of which lack splicing activity under the single-allele condition, restored the splicing activity that governs the female mode of fem splicing. RNA immunoprecipitation quantitative PCR analyses demonstrated that the CSD protein was specifically enriched in several exonic regions in the fem pre-mRNA, and enrichment in exons 3a and 5 was significantly greater under the heterozygous allelic composition than the single-allelic condition. However, in most cases csd expression under the monoallelic condition was capable of inducing the female mode of fem splicing contrary to the conventional CSD model. In contrast, repression of the male mode of fem splicing was predominant under heteroallelic conditions. These results were reproduced by real-time PCR of endogenous fem expression in female and male pupae. These findings strongly suggest that the heteroallelic composition of csd may be more important for the repression of the male splicing mode than for the induction of the female splicing mode of the fem gene.

1. Introduction

Animals that exploit sexual reproduction have evolved diverse sex determination mechanisms. For example, in most mammals sex determination is achieved using the XY-type mode, depending on the presence of the sex-determining region Y (Sry) gene on the Y chromosome [1]. The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster also has X and Y chromosomes, but its sex is not determined by the presence of the Y chromosome [2]. Instead, the collective concentration of several X chromosome-encoded signal element (XES) proteins determines the active state of the Sex-lethal (Sxl) gene, which sits at the top of the sex determination cascade [3,4]. A sufficient amount of XSE is supplied only when the animal has two X chromosomes, leading to female sexual development. In contrast to mammals and Drosophila, the silkworm (Bombyx mori) has a sex chromosome composition in which females are ZW and males are ZZ, and individuals with the W chromosome differentiate into females [5]. The W chromosome-specific gene feminizer (Fem) produces Piwi-interacting RNA, which suppresses the expression of downstream male differentiation genes, leading to female development [6]. Thus, existing sex determination modes are diverse; however, in all of these species, the sex chromosome serves as a sex determination signal.
In contrast, hymenopteran insects do not have sex chromosomes that play a role in sex determination [7]. In these species, haploids hatched from unfertilized eggs become males, and diploids derived from fertilized eggs become females, but diploid males also occur at a low frequency. Whiting (1943) succeeded in creating a diploid male derived from a fertilized egg by inbreeding a Habrobracon species [8]. Based on the occurrence rate of diploid males, he proposed a model for sex determination called complementary sex determination (CSD). In this model, heterozygosity at a single locus (the CSD locus) determines femaleness in diploid individuals, while haploid individuals are hemizygous or homozygous for the CSD locus and thus develop into males [8]. The CSD model has been demonstrated in 33 hymenopteran species to date. Based on the frequency of diploid males, 9 Csd alleles have been estimated in Habrobracon juglandis [9], 19 in Apis mellifera [10], and approximately 50 in Athalia rosae [11].
The CSD locus was first molecularly identified in Apis mellifera [12]. Since then, 15 different csd alleles have been identified [13]. Sequence comparisons among csd alleles demonstrated that synonymous and non-synonymous substitutions occur at approximately the same rate, suggesting that this gene is neutrally evolving [14]. The knockdown of csd expression by RNA interference showed that a heterozygous allelic composition encodes a functional product that initiates female development, while a hemi- or homozygous allelic composition produces a nonfunctional product that leads to male development by default [12,15]. Beye et al. (2003) hypothesized that only a combination of polypeptides from different alleles yields an active heteromeric protein complex.
csd regulates sex-specific splicing of the downstream target gene fem, which is required for femaleness [15,16]. The female mode of fem splicing occurs only when csd is present in the heteroallelic condition. The female form of the Fem protein is active and induces female development [15,16]. In the absence of Csd protein activity in males, fem pre-mRNA is spliced into the male form, which includes male-specific exons (exons 3 to 5) with an intervening stop codon. The male form of Fem is inactive and leads to male development. As in other dipteran insects, the protein product of the transformer-2 gene (Am-tra2) is essential for female-specific splicing of the fem pre-mRNA [17]. Nissen et al. postulated that the Am-Tra2 protein may act in combination with heteroallelic Csd proteins to mediate female fem splicing by binding to fem pre-mRNAs. However, the mechanism by which Csd proteins become active only when csd occurs in the heteroallelic composition remains unknown.
To identify this mechanism, we developed an in vitro assay system to evaluate the activity of Csd proteins. In the present study, the activity of Csd encoded by different alleles was quantitatively compared using that system. Our results demonstrate that Csd can induce the female mode of fem splicing even under single-allele conditions. Csd induced the female mode of fem splicing under heterozygous allelic conditions, but induced both the male and female modes of fem splicing in most cases under single-allele conditions. Based on these findings, we propose a new model for sex determination in honeybees.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Genomic DNA Extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted from adult honeybees, Apis mellifera, which were collected from the field at the University of Tokyo Kashiwa Campus (5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan) around July 2016 according to a protocol reported previously [18].

2.2. RNA Extraction and RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from three adult females and from BmN cells using ISOGEN (Nippon Gene) reagent, as described previously [19]. Poly(A)+ RNA was further purified from the total RNA extracted from BmN cells using the Magnosphere UltraPure mRNA Purification Kit (TaKaRa), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA synthesis was performed according to a previously described protocol [19]. The resulting cDNA was subjected to PCR using KOD-FX (Toyobo) polymerase according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The primer sequences and PCR conditions utilized in this study are listed in Table 1. The PCR products were analyzed on a 2% agarose gel and visualized with ethidium bromide.

2.3. Plasmid Construction

PCR amplification of the fem genomic sequence was accomplished using genomic DNA extracted from a single adult honeybee as a template. Initially, a 4973-bp fem gene fragment containing exons 2–6 was amplified by PCR using the primers 5′-CAT GGC GCG CCT AAC CTA AAA CAA GAT TTG CAG-3′ and 5′-CAT GTC GAC TGA TTT TTC AAT ATT TAC AGC-3′. The amplified DNA was cloned into the Asc I and Sal I sites immediately downstream of the Bombyx mori cytoplasmic actin 3 promoter in pBmA3 [20] using the In-Fusion HD Cloning Kit (Takara Bio Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, thereby creating the fem minigene. The full-length open reading frame (ORF) of csd was amplified using the primers CsdBamF1 (5′-CGG GAT CCC ATG AAA CGA AAT ATA TCA AAT TAT TC-3′) and CsdHindR1 (5′-CCC AAG CTT CAT TGA TGC GTA GGT CCA AAT C-3′), with cDNA prepared from adult females as a template. The resulting product was digested at the BamH I and Hind III sites, introduced using the CsdBamF1 and CsdHindR1 primers, and then inserted into the corresponding site of the pIEx1 vector (Novagen) to generate a plasmid for the expression of the Csd protein. The full-length ORF encoding the Am-Tra2 protein was obtained by PCR amplification using the primers Atra2NcoF (5′-CAT CCA TGG CAA TGA GTG ACA TTG AGC GAA G-3′) and Amtra2BamR (5′-CAT GGA TCC TTA ATA TCG ACG TGG TGA ATA AG-3′), with cDNA prepared from adult females as a template. The resulting product was digested at the Nco I and BamH I sites, introduced using the Atra2NcoF and Amtra2BamR primers, and then inserted into the corresponding site of the pIEx1 vector to create a plasmid for the expression of Am-Tra2. The nucleotide sequences of the resulting constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing.

2.4. DNA Transfection of Cells

The fem minigene (1 μg) was transfected into BmN cells established from the ovaries of the silkworm B. mori [19], with or without 1 μg plasmid DNA containing Csd protein-coding cDNA or Am-Tra2 protein-coding cDNA according to a protocol described previously [20]. Poly(A)+ RNA was isolated 48 h after transfection, as described above, and then subjected to cDNA synthesis according to a previously described protocol [20]. The female and male modes of fem splicing were detected by PCR using KOD-FX (Toyobo) polymerase according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The primer sequences and PCR conditions are listed in Table 1. All PCR products were analyzed on a 2% agarose gel and visualized with ethidium bromide.

2.5. Quantitative RT-PCR

Quantitative RT-PCR was performed according to a protocol published previously [20], using the primers listed in Table 2. Primers ArEF-1qF and ArEF-1qR, which specifically amplify the elongation factor-1α (EF-1α) gene in Apis mellifera, were used as the standard for quantification by PCR. The threshold cycle (CT) value was normalized to that of the EF-1α gene using Multiple RQ software (Takara Bio Inc., Kusatsu, Japan). We checked the dissociation curves of qPCR products to confirm that the primer sets did not produce off-target products. The expression of the target of interest (TOI) gene (female type fem [fem-F] and csd) was determined relative to a reference gene (EF-1α) over six qPCR runs. Finally, the level of the fem-F transcript relative to the csd gene was estimated in each group. The primer sequences are shown in Table 2.

2.6. RNA Immunoprecipitation qPCR (RIP-qPCR) Analysis

The full-length ORFs of the indicated csd alleles (csd2-3 and csd3-1) were artificially synthesized using by Eurofin Genomics (Tokyo, Japan). The synthesized DNA fragments were inserted into the Nco I and BamH I sites in the pIEx-1 vector (Novagen) to create a plasmid for the expression of either CSD2-3 or CSD3-1 protein. The nucleotide sequence encoding V5-tag (GKPIPNPLLGLDST), which was linked to the 5’ end of the ORF of the indicated csd alleles, was also artificially synthesized as described above. The resulting DNA fragment was inserted into the Nco I and BamH I sites in the pIEx-1 vector (Novagen) to create a plasmid for the expression of either V5-CSD2-3 or V5-CSD3-1 protein. The nucleotide sequences of the resulting constructs were confirmed using DNA sequencing. BmN cells were transfected with the fem minigene, together with plasmids that expressed CSD2-3, CSD3-1, V5-CSD2-3, and V5-CSD3-1 proteins in the indicated combinations. BmN cells transfected with the fem minigene and the empty vector (pIEx-1) served as negative controls. Three days after transfection, the cells were harvested and whole cell lysates were prepared according to a previously described protocol [21,22]. Then, 20 μL of Dynabeads Protein G (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) was incubated with 3.5 μg of anti-V5 tag antibody (ProteinTech Group, Rosemont, IL, USA) at room temperature for 10 min with gentle agitations. The resulting Dynabeads were incubated with cell lysate containing 400 μg of proteins at 4 °C for 1 h on a rotating wheel to prepare RIP samples. Negative control RIP samples were prepared using Dynabeads coupled with Normal Rabbit IgG (Fujifilm Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Pellets were washed five times with lysis buffer [23], and dissolved in 500 μL of ISOGEN during the last wash. RNA was isolated as described above, resuspended in 20 μL of RNase-free water, and treated with TURBO DNase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To quantify the amount of target sequence in the immunoprecipitated RNA/protein complexes, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed as described above. The primer sequences are shown in Table 2.

3. Results

3.1. Acquisition of csd Alleles

The csd gene is a paralog of fem, which is an ortholog of the transformer (tra) gene [11]. tra is a conserved upstream component of the insect sex determination cascade that induces female development by regulating the sex-specific alternative splicing of downstream targets such as doublesex (dsx) [24,25]. As the silkworm does not have a tra ortholog, cultured cells established from silkworm tissues have been used to evaluate the function of tra in various animal species [20,21,26]. Therefore, in this study we aimed to assess the effect of Csd proteins on fem splicing using a previously established in vitro splicing assay system in cultured silkworm cells [20,21,26].
The csd alleles analyzed here were acquired from wild females (workers) of the honeybee, Apis mellifera, collected while flying around the University of Tokyo Kashiwa Campus in 2016. From those bees, we successfully obtained nine alleles, each of which encodes a different amino acid sequence. The alignment of the amino acid sequences of the Csd proteins encoded by each allele revealed mutations including amino acid substitutions and deletions at specific positions within the N-terminal region, the arginine- and serine-rich (RS) domain, the hypervariable region, and the proline-rich region (Figure 1a). To visualize the differences among these Csd proteins, mutations held by two representative alleles (csd2-3 and csd2-6) were defined as type A and type B, and the remaining alleles were classified by examining whether the mutations found at each amino acid position aligned with type A or type B (Figure 1b). For example, the Csd protein encoded by the csd3-1 allele consists of the same amino acid sequence as the Csd protein encoded by the csd2-3 allele, except for a mutation at amino acid position 336. For the strong expression of the Csd proteins in cultured silkworm cells, cDNA fragments containing ORFs derived from the respective csd alleles were incorporated into the pIEx-1 vector, which was designed to allow protein expression in cultured insect cells.

3.2. Heterogeneous Expression of Csd Proteins Induces Female-Specific Splicing of the fem Minigene

fem pre-mRNA exhibits sex-associated differences in splicing between exons 3 and 6. Female-specific fem splicing occurs between the splice donor site, located in the middle of exon 3, and the 5′ splice acceptor site of exon 6 (Figure 2a) [13]. To test whether our in vitro splicing assay system can reproduce the sex-specific splicing of fem pre-mRNA, the splicing pattern of the fem minigene was investigated by RT-PCR in the presence or absence of the Csd protein. For this purpose, the fem minigene, which contains genomic DNA encompassing exons 2 to 6 of fem (Figure 2b), was co-transfected with an expression vector encoding the Csd protein and the Am-Tra2 expression vector into BmN cells. The csd alleles used in these experiments were csd2-6 and csd5-4.
To avoid the detection of contaminating plasmid DNA in total RNA samples and to allow independent quantification of sex-specific splicing isoforms of the fem mRNAs, we designed primers that specifically anneal to the female-specific and male-specific fem transcripts (Figure 2b). RT-PCR analysis using these primers revealed that the female mode of fem splicing occurred when cells were transfected with both the Csd2-6 and Csd5-4 expression vectors (Figure 2c, lane 2). The same results were obtained when cDNA prepared from a female (=heterozygous for the csd allele) pupa was subjected to the same RT-PCR analysis (Figure 2c, lane 5). In addition to the female mode of fem splicing, the male splicing was observed when cells were transfected with a single Csd expression vector (Figure 2c, lanes 3 and 4). The same results were obtained by RT-PCR using cDNA prepared from a male (=hemizygous for the csd allele) pupa (Figure 2c, lane 6). On the other hand, no amplified products were observed in the negative control cells, into which the fem minigene was co-transfected with an empty vector instead of the Csd expression vector (Figure 2c, lane 1). These results demonstrated that our in vitro splicing assay system reproduced the endogenous sex-specific splicing regulation of fem pre-mRNA.

3.3. Csd Induces the Female Mode of Fem Splicing under Single-Allele Conditions

A previous study indicated that the female mode of fem splicing occurs only when csd is present in the heteroallelic condition [15]. Contrary to this finding, our RT-PCR analysis demonstrated that the female mode of fem splicing was observed even when the fem minigene was co-transfected with a single Csd expression vector (Figure 2c, lanes 3 and 4). The female mode of fem splicing was also observed in the male pupa that should be hemizygous for the csd allele (Figure 2c, lane 6). In our in vitro assay system, 1 μg of a single Csd expression vector was used for each assay. Thus, the amount of the Csd expression vector under the heteroallelic condition was twice as high as that under the single-allele condition, because two different Csd expression vectors were transfected into cells in the former case. This difference in the amount of transfected DNA may have led to a difference in the efficiency of fem splicing. To examine this possibility, we investigated the dose effect of Csd expression vectors on fem splicing. As shown in Figure 2d, transfection of 125, 250 and 500 ng Csd2-6 expression vector led to the female mode of fem splicing (Figure 2d, lanes 1 to 3), suggesting that at least 125 ng vector was required to induce the female mode of fem splicing. Similar results were obtained with the Csd5-4 expression vector (Figure 2d, lanes 4 to 6). Only the female fem splicing was observed when Csd2-6 and Csd5-4 expression vectors were transfected simultaneously, even though the amount of each vector was half that of that in the single allelic conditions (Figure 2d, lanes 7 to 9). These results suggest that no additive effects on the induction of female-mode fem splicing occurred among different csd alleles.
To assess whether Csd derived from a single allele can reproducibly induce female splicing, all csd alleles acquired in this study were subjected to in vitro analysis. As shown in Figure 3a, seven of the nine examined alleles induced the female mode of fem splicing. These results strongly suggest that Csd can induce the female mode of fem splicing, even under single-allele conditions. On the other hand, no amplification product was observed in cells transfected either with the Csd2-3 or Csd3-1 expression vectors (Figure 3a, upper panel, lane 1 and lane 3). These splicing defects could be attributed to the amino acid sequences of the protein products, as the sequences of these two alleles were identical aside from one amino acid residue at position 336 (described as H4 in Figure 1a). Interestingly, the splicing activity that leads to the female mode of fem splicing was fully restored when these two alleles were expressed simultaneously (Figure 3b, upper panel, lane 7). The female mode of fem splicing was also observed when cells were transfected with Csd expression vectors in all heteroallelic compositions examined (Figure 3b, upper panel). However, the male mode of fem splicing was observed even in several heteroallelic compositions (Figure 3b lower panel, allelic compositions 2-3/2-6, 3-2/3-7, 2-3/3-1, and 2-3/3-2).
These results suggest that heteroallelic conditions are not necessary to induce the female mode of fem splicing. However, it is possible that the efficiency of splicing may be greater under the heteroallelic than single-allele condition. To test this hypothesis, the level of female type transcript produced from the fem minigene was quantified and compared between these two conditions by qRT-PCR. The relative levels of female type fem transcript varied significantly among csd alleles (Figure 3c). In most cases, Csd expression in the heteroallelic composition yielded similar levels of the female-type transcript to the cells that expressed Csd2-6, Csd3-2, and Csd3-7 in the single-allele condition (Figure 3c). Only two heteroallelic compositions showed significantly higher levels of female-mode fem splicing than the single-allele condition (Figure 3c; allelic compositions Csd2-3/Csd2-6 and Csd2-3/Csd3-7). These results strongly suggest that the heteroallelic composition of csd is not necessary for improving the efficiency of female-mode fem splicing. However, the level of the female type fem transcript in heteroallelic compositions was significantly higher than that in monoallelic conditions, when all the data were integrated and compared between the two groups (Figure 3d).

3.4. Csd Protein Specifically Enriches fem Pre-mRNA Even under Monoallelic Conditions

The above results strongly suggest that the heteroallelic composition of csd is not necessary to induce the female mode of fem splicing, and that the efficiency of fem splicing is similar between monoallelic and heteroallelic conditions. To validate the results, we assessed the interaction between Csd proteins and fem pre-mRNA, and compared the efficiency of RNA-protein complex formation between monoallelic and heteroallelic conditions.
Nissen et al. (2012) postulated that the Am-Tra2 protein may act in combination with heteroallelic Csd proteins to mediate female fem splicing by binding to fem pre-mRNAs [17]. In D. melanogaster, Tra and Tra2 proteins induce female-specific splicing of dsx by binding to repetitive cis-elements, called dsxREs, that present on female-specific exons of dsx [27,28]. Comparative sequence analyses of A. mellifera dsx and Nasonia vitripennis dsx revealed the presence of (U/G)GAAGAU(U/A) repeats, clustered on a short sequence stretch in female-specific exons [29]. Bertossa et al. (2009) suggested that repeats of this consensus sequence may constitute recognition sites for the factors activating female-specific splicing in hymenopteran species [29]. We searched for the core sequence (GAAGAU) of the putative female-specific splicing factor-binding sites in the fem pre-mRNA sequence, and found that the fem pre-mRNA had five GAAGAU sites (described as e2, e3a, e3b, e5, and i5 in Figure 4a). A comparison of nucleotide sequences flanking these five sites with the 14-nt consensus sequence identified previously [29] revealed that 11-nt of the 14-nt consensus sequences were identical to e3a and e5 (Figure 4b). RIP-qPCR analysis was performed to examine whether Csd proteins interacted with the fem pre-mRNA through these five sites. csd2-3 and csd3-1 were subjected to the analysis because the female mode of fem splicing was observed only when these two alleles were expressed under heteroallelic conditions (Figure 3a,b). Since we had not prepared an antibody against Csd, we produced Csd fused to the V5 tag and immunoprecipitated Csd-RNA complexes with anti-V5 tag antibodies (see Materials and Methods). Then, the RNA was extracted and the enrichment of V5 tag-fusion protein on the fem pre-mRNA was quantified using qRT-PCR with primers that specifically amplified regions containing the five GAAGAU sites (Figure 4a). The exonic sequence of exon 3a was almost identical to that of exon 5, and we could not design primers that allowed discrimination between exons 3a and 5. The highest level of protein enrichment on exonic regions containing e3a and e5 sites was observed when cells were transfected with Csd2-3 expression vector together with Csd3-1 expression vector (heteroallelic composition) (Figure 4c). Although single allelic expression of Csd2-3 and Csd3-1 decreased the level of protein enrichment in the same region, enrichment was still significantly higher than in cells transfected with the empty vector. These results suggested that heteroallelic expression of the Csd protein may allow for interaction between Csd protein and fem pre-mRNA, leading to the female mode of fem splicing. However, contrary to the hypotheses of Beye et al. (2003) [12] and Nissen et al. (2012) [17], the formation of heteromeric Csd protein complexes seemed unnecessary for Csd-fem pre-mRNA interaction, because a sufficient level of Csd enrichment was observed in monoallelic conditions. Significant enrichment was also observed on the exonic region containing e2 site when cells were transfected either with Csd2-3 or Csd3-1 expression vector (Figure 4c). Heteroallelic expression of Csd alleles caused no significant enrichment in the same region. An interaction between the Csd protein and the fem pre-mRNA was observed regardless of whether the Csd expression was under monoallelic or heteroallelic conditions, consistent with the observation that the female mode of fem splicing occurred even under single allele conditions. In addition, the fact that Csd2-3 and Csd3-1 could interact with fem pre-mRNA despite a lack of fem splicing activity (Figure 2a,c) indicated that the interaction between Csd and fem pre-mRNA may not be directly involved in the female mode of fem splicing.

4. Discussion

To molecularly characterize the function of Csd, which is responsible for CSD in honeybees, we developed an in vitro assay system to evaluate the splicing activity of Csd proteins (Figure 2). In the present study, we used this system and found that csd expression in the monoallelic condition was capable of inducing the female mode of fem splicing (Figure 2 and Figure 3). The efficiency of female-mode fem splicing was similar between single-allele and heteroallelic conditions (Figure 3c). Interactions between Csd protein and fem pre-mRNA were observed regardless of whether the Csd expression was monoallelic or heteroallelic (Figure 3c). The most striking difference between monoallelic and heteroallelic Csd expression was the occurrence (or not) of the male mode of fem splicing (Figure 3a,b). The male mode of fem splicing was generally observed only under monoallelic conditions (Figure 3a). Consistent with our findings, RT-PCR analysis in a previous report indicated the presence of both fem-F and fem-M transcripts in haploid male embryos [17]. These findings are in contrast to a previous report that Csd proteins are activated only when csd occurs in the heteroallelic composition, leading to female development via the induction of female-mode fem splicing [13,15]. One possible explanation for this discrepancy is that the male form of the Fem protein may play a role in promoting male development. Alternatively, the male-specific isoform of Fem may act as a dominant negative regulator of the female Fem isoform, which is required for femaleness, thus leading to male development. fem has been identified as a tra ortholog in A. mellifera [13]. The splicing patterns of tra transcripts characterized to date in holometabolous insects indicate sexual dimorphism, with only the female-specific splicing variant encoding a functional protein, while the male-specific splicing variant yields truncated or nonfunctional protein products lacking significant domains [30] (Figure 5a). The male-mode fem transcript produces a truncated version of Fem in A. mellifera due to the inclusion of exons containing an intervening stop codon [13]. However, in contrast to the male Tra proteins in other holometabolous insects, the male isoform of Fem in A. mellifera contains an RS domain, which mediates protein–protein interactions and regulates the recognition of specific splice sites [31] (Figure 5a). Thus, the male isoform of Fem may have some function in male development in the honeybee. This hypothesis is supported by the previous finding that Am-Tra2 plays a positive role in inducing the male mode of fem splicing [17].
If the male isoform of Fem has functions in male development, then csd expression under heteroallelic conditions would be more important for repressing the male mode of splicing than for inducing the female mode of splicing. Beye et al. (2003) hypothesized that only the combination of polypeptides from different alleles yields an active heteromeric protein complex, as most of the allelic polymorphism in the Csd amino acid sequence exists within the C-terminal region, which contains the RS and proline-rich domains [12]. RS domains and proline-rich regions have protein binding capacity [32,33], suggesting that differences in the amino acid sequences of these regions may affect the protein−protein interactions involved in splicing regulation. Csd2-3 and Csd3-1 were capable of interacting with fem pre-mRNA under monoallelic conditions despite a lack of fem splicing activity (Figure 4c). This suggests that the functional difference between monoallelic and heteroallelic Csd proteins was not due to the ability to bind to the fem pre-mRNA, but rather to the ability to interact with factors required for regulating sex-specific fem splicing. Further research is needed to clarify whether monoallelic and heteroallelic Csd proteins show differences in protein profiles interacting with Csd.
In several heteroallelic compositions the male mode of fem splicing was observed, as was the case under single-allele conditions (Figure 3b, allelic compositions 2-3/2-6, 3-2/3-7, 2-3/3-1, and 2-3/3-2). If our hypothesis is true, then individuals carrying these alleles will develop into males or intersex animals despite possessing the csd gene in the heteroallelic condition. In such cases, the resulting males would be diploid. However, diploid males do not participate in reproduction, as they are usually eaten by adult female worker honeybees during the larval stage [35,36]. As a consequence, it is not possible to find diploid males that are heterozygous for csd in nature.
In the present study, we identified two csd alleles (csd2-3 and csd3-1) that lacked the capacity to splice fem pre-mRNA into the female form (Figure 3a). The alignment of the amino acid sequences of Csd proteins revealed that four amino acid residues were common to both the csd2-3 and csd3-1 alleles and differed from other alleles, all of which were located in the RS domain (Figure 1a,b). This difference may underlie the loss of splicing activity. However, the same amino acid substitutions were observed in the csd3-7 allele, which showed relatively strong activity for inducing female-mode fem splicing (Figure 1a and Figure 3c). One possible explanation for this discrepancy is that three amino acid residues near the N-terminal region (amino acid positions 69, 73, and 115) in the csd3-7 allele differ from the sequences of csd2-3 and csd3-1 (Figure 1a,b). The N-terminal region of Csd may include some unknown domains that are capable of complementing the function of the RS domain. The amino acid substitutions specifically observed in the csd3-7 allele may enhance this complementary activity, thereby restoring the loss of function of the RS domain.
As described above, csd2-3 and csd3-1 showed no splicing activity under the single-allele condition (Figure 3a,c). Nevertheless, co-expression of these two alleles fully restored the splicing activity that governs the female mode of fem splicing (Figure 3b,c). A single amino acid sequence polymorphism between these two alleles was found within the hypervariable region (H4 in Figure 1a), which has been identified previously [12]. Beye et al. (2003) reported that most amino acid differences characterizing the various alleles of this gene are found in the hypervariable region located between the RS domain and proline-rich region. However, whether these differences have functional significance remains unknown. Our results suggest that amino acid sequence polymorphisms in the hypervariable region may play an important role in restoring splicing activity when csd alleles with serious defects are present in a heterozygous individual. The heteroallelic expression of Csd2-3 and Csd3-1 slightly increased the relative Csd protein enrichment level on the fem pre-mRNA; this increase may help to restore the splicing activity. Although the details of the mechanism underlying this restoration are unknown at present, our findings provide important clues for understanding the function of the hypervariable region.

5. Conclusions

To gain insights into how Csd proteins are activated only under the heterozygous allelic composition, we developed an in vitro assay system to evaluate the activity of Csd proteins. By using this system, the splicing activity of Csd encoded by different alleles was quantitatively compared. Contrary to the conventional model as described above, most of the examined csd alleles were able to induce the female mode of fem splicing, even under monoallelic conditions. Moreover, our results clearly showed that a heterozygous allelic condition is critical for repressing the male mode of fem splicing, rather than for inducing female-specific fem splicing. These results were reproduced by RT-PCR analysis of endogenous fem expression in female and male pupae. These findings strongly suggest that the heteroallelic composition of csd may be more important for the repression of the male splicing mode than for the induction of the female splicing mode of the fem gene. In contrast to the male Tra proteins in other holometabolous insects, the male isoform of Fem in A. mellifera is relatively larger and contains a functionally important domain, RS domain (Figure 5). Thus, the male isoform of Fem may have some function in male development in the honeybee. Based on these findings, we propose a new model for sex determination in honeybees, where csd expression under heteroallelic conditions would be important for repressing the male mode of fem splicing to ensure the female development. Our hypothesis is supported by the previous finding that both females and males produce presumably functional Tra protein isoforms that include the functionally important domains in several hemimetabolous insects [37]. fem in the honeybee might still partially retain the ancestral state of the tra gene.

Author Contributions

Y.S. performed the in vitro assays of the splicing ability of each csd allele examined in this study. T.Y. reared honeybees and performed the sexing of the honeybee pupae subject to RT-PCR analysis. M.G.S. performed RIP-qPCR analysis and RT-PCR expression analysis with female and male pupae. Y.S. and M.G.S. conceived and designed this study. All authors discussed the data and helped in the preparation of the manuscript. Y.S. and M.G.S. wrote the manuscript, with intellectual input from all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) 20H02996 and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas 20H04919.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The BmN cell lines used in this study are continuously passaged at the Laboratory of Bio-resource Regulation, Department of Integrated Biosciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo. The male and female pupae of honeybees examined in this study is continuously reared at the YAMADA-KUN’S Bee Farm. All data obtained or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the laboratory members for their cooperation in capturing and collecting the honeybees.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kashimada, K.; Koopman, P. Sry: The master switch in mammalian sex determination. Development 2010, 137, 3921–3930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Bridges, C.B. Triploid intersexes in Drosophila melanogaster. Science 1921, 16, 252–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Erickson, J.W.; Quintero, J.J. Indirect effects of ploidy suggest X chromosome dose, not the X:A ratio, signals sex in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5, e332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Lu, H.; Kozhina, E.; Mahadevaraju, S.; Yang, D.; Avila, F.W.; Erickson, J.W. Maternal Groucho and bHLH repressors amplify the dose-sensitive X chromosome signal in Drosophila sex determination. Dev. Biol. 2008, 323, 248–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Hashimoto, H. The role of the W-chromosome in the sex determination of Bombyx mori. Jpn. J. Genet. 1933, 8, 245–247. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kiuchi, T.; Koga, H.; Kawamoto, M.; Shoji, K.; Sakai, H.; Arai, Y.; Ishihara, G.; Kawaoka, S.; Sugano, S.; Shimada, T.; et al. A single female-specific piRNA is the primary determiner of sex in the silkworm. Nature 2014, 509, 633–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Cook, M. Sex determination in the hymenoptera: A review of models and evidence. Heredity 1993, 71, 421–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Whiting, P.W. Multiple alleles in complementary sex determination of Habrobracon. Genetics 1943, 28, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Whiting, P.W. Genetics of Habrobracon. Adv. Genet. 1961, 10, 295–348. [Google Scholar]
  10. Adams, J.; Rothman, E.D.; Kerr, W.E.; Paulino, Z.L. Estimation of the number of sex alleles and queen matings from diploid male frequencies in a population of Apis mellifera. Genetics 1977, 86, 583–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Naito, T.; Suzuki, H. Sex determination in the sawfly, Athalia rosae ruficornis (Hymenoptera): Occurrence of triploid males. J. Hered. 1991, 82, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Beye, M.; Hasselmann, M.; Fondrk, M.K.; Page, R.E.; Omholt, S.W. The gene csd is the primary signal for sexual development in the honeybee and encodes an SR-type protein. Cell 2003, 114, 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Hasselmann, M.; Gempe, T.; Schiøtt, M.; Nunes-Silva, C.G.; Otte, M.; Beye, M. Evidence for the evolutionary nascence of a novel sex determination pathway in honeybees. Nature 2008, 454, 519–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Koch, V.; Nissen, I.; Schmitt, B.D.; Beye, M. Independent evolutionary origin of fem paralogous genes and complementary sex determination in hymenopteran insects. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e91883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Gempe, T.; Hasselmann, M.; Schiøtt, M.; Hause, G.; Otte, M.; Beye, M. Sex determination in honeybees: Two separate mechanisms induce and maintain the female pathway. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7, e1000222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. McAfee, A.; Pettis, J.S.; Tarpy, D.R.; Foster, L.J. Feminizer and doublesex knock-outs cause honey bees to switch sexes. PLoS Biol. 2019, 17, e30002562019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Nissen, I.; Müller, M.; Beye, M. The Am-tra2 gene is an essential regulator of female splice regulation at two levels of the sex determination hierarchy of the honeybee. Genetics 2012, 192, 1015–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Wagamitsu, S.; Takase, D.; Aoki, F.; Suzuki, M.G. Identification of the Doublesex protein binding sites that activate expression of lozenge in the female genital disc in Drosophila melanogaster. Mech. Dev. 2017, 143, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Maeda, S. A plaque assay and cloning of Bombyx mori nuclear polyhedrosis virus. J. Sericult. Sci. 1984, 53, 547–548. [Google Scholar]
  20. Suzuki, M.G.; Suzuki, K.; Aoki, F.; Ajimura, M. Effect of RNAi-mediated knockdown of the Bombyx mori transformer-2 gene on the sex-specific splicing of Bmdsx pre-mRNA. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2012, 56, 693–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Tanaka, A.; Aoki, F.; Suzuki, M.G. Conserved domains in Transformer protein act complementary to regulate sex-specific splicing of its own pre-mRNA. Sex Dev. 2018, 12, 189–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yuzawa, T.; Matsuoka, M.; Sumitani, M.; Aoki, F.; Sezutsu, H.; Suzuki, M.G. Transgenic and knockout analyses of Masculinizer and doublesex illuminated the unique functions of doublesex in germ cell sexual development of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. BMC Dev. Biol. 2020, 20, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Esnault, S.; Malter, J.S. Hyaluronic acid or TNF-alpha plus fibronectin triggers granulocyte macrophage-colony-stimulating factor mRNA stabilization in eosinophils yet engages differential intracellular pathways and mRNA binding proteins. J. Immunol. 2003, 171, 6780–6787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Gempe, T.; Beye, M. Function and evolution of sex determination mechanisms, genes and pathways in insects. BioEssays 2011, 33, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Hoshijima, K.; Inoue, K.; Higuchi, I.; Sakamoto, H.; Shimura, Y. Control of doublesex alternative splicing by transformer and transformer-2 in Drosophila. Science 1991, 252, 833–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Suzuki, M.G.; Kobayashi, S.; Aoki, F. Male-specific splicing of the silkworm Imp gene is maintained by an autoregulatory mechanism. Mech. Dev. 2014, 131, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hedley, M.L.; Maniatis, T. Sex-specific splicing and polyadenylation of dsx pre-mRNA requires a sequence that binds specifically to tra-2 protein in vitro. Cell 1991, 65, 579–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Heinrichs, V.; Ryner, L.C.; Baker, B.S. Regulation of sex-specific selection of fruitless 5′ splice sites by transformer and transformer-2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1998, 18, 450–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Bertossa, R.C.; van de Zande, L.; Beukeboom, L.W. The Fruitless gene in Nasonia displays complex sex-specific splicing and contains new zinc finger domains. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2009, 26, 1557–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Bopp, D.; Saccone, G.; Beye, M. Sex determination in insects: Variations on a common theme. Sex Dev. 2014, 8, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Manley, J.L.; Tacke, R. SR proteins and splicing control. Genes Dev. 1996, 10, 569–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Graveley, B.R. Sorting out the complexity of SR protein functions. RNA 2000, 6, 1197–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Kay, B.K.; Williamson, M.P.; Sudol, M. The importance of being proline: The interaction of proline-rich motifs in signaling proteins with their cognate domains. FASEB J. 2000, 14, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hediger, M.; Henggeler, C.; Meier, N.; Perez, R.; Saccone, G.; Bopp, D. Molecular characterization of the key switch F provides a basis for understanding the rapid divergence of the sex-determining pathway in the housefly. Genetics 2010, 184, 155–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Woyke, J. What happens to diploid drone larvae in a honey bee colony? J. Apic. Res. 1963, 2, 73–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Santomauro, G.; Oldham, N.; Boland, W.; Enbels, W. Cannibalism of diploid drone larvae in the honey bee (Apis mellifera) is released by odd pattern of cuticular substances. J. Apic. Res. 2004, 43, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wexler, J.; Delaney, E.K.; Belles, X.; Schal, C.; Wada-Katsumata, A.; Amicucci, M.J.; Kopp, A. Hemimetabolous insects elucidate the origin of sexual development via alternative splicing. Elife 2019, 8, e47490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jdb 11 00010 g001 550
Figure 1. Variations in the amino acid sequences encoded by csd alleles identified in this study. (a) Alignment of the amino acid sequences in regions with interallelic polymorphisms among the alleles. Both the N-terminal region and proline-rich regions contain three amino acid substitutions (N1–N3 and P1–P3). Seven amino acid substitutions (R1–R5, R7, and R8) and a substitution of two consecutive amino acid residues (R6) were found within the RS domain. Various mutations were observed within the hypervariable region (R1–R8). (b) Classification of alleles based on the polymorphisms in their amino acid sequences. The mutations observed at the indicated positions (N1–N3, R1–R8, H1–H6, and P1–P3) in csd2-3 and csd2-6 were defined as types A and B, respectively. Polymorphisms that did not belong to either type A or B are classified as type C.
Figure 1. Variations in the amino acid sequences encoded by csd alleles identified in this study. (a) Alignment of the amino acid sequences in regions with interallelic polymorphisms among the alleles. Both the N-terminal region and proline-rich regions contain three amino acid substitutions (N1–N3 and P1–P3). Seven amino acid substitutions (R1–R5, R7, and R8) and a substitution of two consecutive amino acid residues (R6) were found within the RS domain. Various mutations were observed within the hypervariable region (R1–R8). (b) Classification of alleles based on the polymorphisms in their amino acid sequences. The mutations observed at the indicated positions (N1–N3, R1–R8, H1–H6, and P1–P3) in csd2-3 and csd2-6 were defined as types A and B, respectively. Polymorphisms that did not belong to either type A or B are classified as type C.
Jdb 11 00010 g001
Jdb 11 00010 g002 550
Figure 2. The in vitro assay system developed in this study for evaluating the splicing activity of Csd proteins. (a) Schematic diagram of sex-differential splicing of the fem gene reported by Hasselmann et al. (2008) [13]. Boxes represent exons. Introns are indicated by lines. The number in each box represents the exon number. Exons shown with gray boxes are male-specific exons. (b) Upper panel shows a schematic diagram of the fem minigene construct used for assessing the splicing activity of Csd protein in BmN cells. The filled arrow represents the promoter, consisting of a promoter sequence of the Bombyx mori actin 3 gene (A3pro), used for inducing transcription of the fem minigene. Lower panel shows a female-specific fem transcript (fem-F) and a male-specific transcript (fem-M) produced by the two splicing modes. Arrows indicate the approximate position and direction of primers used for RT-PCR to detect the male and female splicing modes. (c) The fem minigene was co-transfected into BmN cells with a plasmid expressing the indicated csd allele. The Am-tra2 expression vector was also transfected in all cases. The female and male modes of fem splicing (fem-F and fem-M, respectively) were detected by RT-PCR using the primers illustrated in (b). The expression of csd and Am-tra2 transfected into BmN cells was confirmed by RT-PCR. (d) The indicated amount of Csd expressing plasmid was transfected to examine the dose effect of the plasmid DNA on fem splicing. The RT-PCR conditions described in (c) were used to detect the female and male modes of fem splicing. The amplification products were separated on a 2% agarose gel and visualized using ethidium bromide.
Figure 2. The in vitro assay system developed in this study for evaluating the splicing activity of Csd proteins. (a) Schematic diagram of sex-differential splicing of the fem gene reported by Hasselmann et al. (2008) [13]. Boxes represent exons. Introns are indicated by lines. The number in each box represents the exon number. Exons shown with gray boxes are male-specific exons. (b) Upper panel shows a schematic diagram of the fem minigene construct used for assessing the splicing activity of Csd protein in BmN cells. The filled arrow represents the promoter, consisting of a promoter sequence of the Bombyx mori actin 3 gene (A3pro), used for inducing transcription of the fem minigene. Lower panel shows a female-specific fem transcript (fem-F) and a male-specific transcript (fem-M) produced by the two splicing modes. Arrows indicate the approximate position and direction of primers used for RT-PCR to detect the male and female splicing modes. (c) The fem minigene was co-transfected into BmN cells with a plasmid expressing the indicated csd allele. The Am-tra2 expression vector was also transfected in all cases. The female and male modes of fem splicing (fem-F and fem-M, respectively) were detected by RT-PCR using the primers illustrated in (b). The expression of csd and Am-tra2 transfected into BmN cells was confirmed by RT-PCR. (d) The indicated amount of Csd expressing plasmid was transfected to examine the dose effect of the plasmid DNA on fem splicing. The RT-PCR conditions described in (c) were used to detect the female and male modes of fem splicing. The amplification products were separated on a 2% agarose gel and visualized using ethidium bromide.
Jdb 11 00010 g002
Jdb 11 00010 g003 550
Figure 3. Splicing patterns of the fem minigene under single-allele and heteroallelic conditions. (a) All csd alleles acquired in this study were subjected to the analysis described in Figure 2. (b) Two different csd alleles in the indicated combinations were transfected into BmN cells with the fem minigene to recreate a heteroallelic condition. RT-PCR analysis was performed as described in Figure 2. The csd alleles lacking fem pre-mRNA splicing activity are shown in red. (c) The level of female-type fem transcript produced from the fem minigene relative to the csd expression level was compared between the monoallelic and heteroallelic conditions using qRT-PCR (Materials and Methods). The values obtained from each sample, and their distributions, are represented by box-and-whisker plots. Error bars are standard deviation. Different letters indicate statistically significant group differences (i.e., “a” is significantly different from “b” and “c”, etc.). “bd” means significantly different from groups other than b and d (i.e., not significantly different from groups b and d), and “bcd” means significantly different from groups other than b, c, and d (in other words, not significantly different from groups b, c, and d). There were six qPCR runs per experimental group; the Kruskal–Wallis test was followed by the Dunn–Bonferroni post hoc test, p < 0.001. (d) All single-allele and heteroallelic values indicated in (c) were integrated and statistically compared between the two groups. The values obtained for each sample, and their distributions, are represented by box-and-whisker plots. Error bars are standard deviation. ** p < 0.01 (Mann–Whitney U test).
Figure 3. Splicing patterns of the fem minigene under single-allele and heteroallelic conditions. (a) All csd alleles acquired in this study were subjected to the analysis described in Figure 2. (b) Two different csd alleles in the indicated combinations were transfected into BmN cells with the fem minigene to recreate a heteroallelic condition. RT-PCR analysis was performed as described in Figure 2. The csd alleles lacking fem pre-mRNA splicing activity are shown in red. (c) The level of female-type fem transcript produced from the fem minigene relative to the csd expression level was compared between the monoallelic and heteroallelic conditions using qRT-PCR (Materials and Methods). The values obtained from each sample, and their distributions, are represented by box-and-whisker plots. Error bars are standard deviation. Different letters indicate statistically significant group differences (i.e., “a” is significantly different from “b” and “c”, etc.). “bd” means significantly different from groups other than b and d (i.e., not significantly different from groups b and d), and “bcd” means significantly different from groups other than b, c, and d (in other words, not significantly different from groups b, c, and d). There were six qPCR runs per experimental group; the Kruskal–Wallis test was followed by the Dunn–Bonferroni post hoc test, p < 0.001. (d) All single-allele and heteroallelic values indicated in (c) were integrated and statistically compared between the two groups. The values obtained for each sample, and their distributions, are represented by box-and-whisker plots. Error bars are standard deviation. ** p < 0.01 (Mann–Whitney U test).
Jdb 11 00010 g003
Jdb 11 00010 g004 550
Figure 4. Csd protein is specifically enriched in the region containing putative binding sites for sex-specific splicing factors in the fem pre-mRNA. (a) Approximate positions of the putative binding sites for sex-specific splicing factors are indicated by vertical arrows (e2, e3a, e3b, e5, and i5). The distribution of qRT-PCR amplicons used in the RIP-qPCR analysis in (c) is denoted by colored horizontal lines. (b) Sequence comparison between each putative sex-specific splicing factor-binding site found in the fem pre-mRNA and the 14-nt consensus sequence described previously [29]. The number of matches is indicated on the right of each sequence. (c) The fem minigene was co-transfected into BmN cells together with Csd expression vectors (Csd2-3 and Csd3-1) in the indicated manner. RNA/V5 tag-fusion protein complexes were immunoprecipitated, and enrichment of the V5 tag-fusion protein on the fem pre-mRNA was quantified using qRT-PCR with primers that specifically amplified each region, as illustrated in (a). The relative enrichment was defined as the level of qPCR product amplified from samples relative to the samples precipitated using a negative control antibody (anti-rabbit IgG antibody). The values obtained from each group, and their distributions, are represented by box-and-whisker plots. There were six qPCR runs; * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 compared to the negative control group (Csd2-3- and Csd3-1-; cells transfected with empty vectors) in each region. One-way ANOVA was performed, with the Bonferroni post hoc test applied for multiple comparisons. N.D.: not detected.
Figure 4. Csd protein is specifically enriched in the region containing putative binding sites for sex-specific splicing factors in the fem pre-mRNA. (a) Approximate positions of the putative binding sites for sex-specific splicing factors are indicated by vertical arrows (e2, e3a, e3b, e5, and i5). The distribution of qRT-PCR amplicons used in the RIP-qPCR analysis in (c) is denoted by colored horizontal lines. (b) Sequence comparison between each putative sex-specific splicing factor-binding site found in the fem pre-mRNA and the 14-nt consensus sequence described previously [29]. The number of matches is indicated on the right of each sequence. (c) The fem minigene was co-transfected into BmN cells together with Csd expression vectors (Csd2-3 and Csd3-1) in the indicated manner. RNA/V5 tag-fusion protein complexes were immunoprecipitated, and enrichment of the V5 tag-fusion protein on the fem pre-mRNA was quantified using qRT-PCR with primers that specifically amplified each region, as illustrated in (a). The relative enrichment was defined as the level of qPCR product amplified from samples relative to the samples precipitated using a negative control antibody (anti-rabbit IgG antibody). The values obtained from each group, and their distributions, are represented by box-and-whisker plots. There were six qPCR runs; * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 compared to the negative control group (Csd2-3- and Csd3-1-; cells transfected with empty vectors) in each region. One-way ANOVA was performed, with the Bonferroni post hoc test applied for multiple comparisons. N.D.: not detected.
Jdb 11 00010 g004
Jdb 11 00010 g005 550
Figure 5. A unique feature of the male isoform of Fem in A. mellifera and its plausible function in males based on this study. (a) Schematic alignment of the male and female isoforms of Tra and its orthologous protein Fem. Arginine- and serine-rich domains (RS1 and RS2) are indicated in red; Tra-CAM domains (CAM), which are found in all Tra proteins except those of Drosophila melanogaster [34], are shown in green; and proline-rich domains (P-rich) are indicated with blue boxes. Gray boxes represent male-specific regions. Amino acid sequences of the female isoforms in the indicated organisms refer to ABU68668.1 in Apis mellifera, JQ857102 in Tribolium castaneum, XP_020714997.1 in Ceratitis capitata, and AAF49441.1 in Drosophila melanogaster. Amino acid sequences of the male isoforms refer to ABU68669.1 in A. mellifera, JQ857104 and JQ857103 in T. castaneum, AAM88675.1 and AAM88674.1 in C. capitata, and AAX53589.1 in D. melanogaster. (b) Schematic diagram of a novel CSD model proposed in this study. CSD proteins preferentially bind to the cis-regulatory elements on the exons 3a and 5 in the fem pre-mRNA under both heteroallelic and monoallelic conditions. The male-mode of the fem splicing is repressed only when csd is present in the heteroallelic condition, resulting in the production of FEM-F. FEM-F induces the female-specific splicing of the A. mellifera dsx (Amdsx) gene, yielding the female-isoform of AmDSX protein (AmDSXF). AmDSXF promotes female development. On the other hand, both male and female-modes of the fem splicing occur when individuals are hemizygous or homozygous for the CSD locus. The resulting FEM-M acts as a dominant negative regulator of FEM-F, thus leading to male development through the production of the male isoform of AmDSX protein (AmDSXM) that is produced by the default splicing of Amdsx pre-mRNA.
Figure 5. A unique feature of the male isoform of Fem in A. mellifera and its plausible function in males based on this study. (a) Schematic alignment of the male and female isoforms of Tra and its orthologous protein Fem. Arginine- and serine-rich domains (RS1 and RS2) are indicated in red; Tra-CAM domains (CAM), which are found in all Tra proteins except those of Drosophila melanogaster [34], are shown in green; and proline-rich domains (P-rich) are indicated with blue boxes. Gray boxes represent male-specific regions. Amino acid sequences of the female isoforms in the indicated organisms refer to ABU68668.1 in Apis mellifera, JQ857102 in Tribolium castaneum, XP_020714997.1 in Ceratitis capitata, and AAF49441.1 in Drosophila melanogaster. Amino acid sequences of the male isoforms refer to ABU68669.1 in A. mellifera, JQ857104 and JQ857103 in T. castaneum, AAM88675.1 and AAM88674.1 in C. capitata, and AAX53589.1 in D. melanogaster. (b) Schematic diagram of a novel CSD model proposed in this study. CSD proteins preferentially bind to the cis-regulatory elements on the exons 3a and 5 in the fem pre-mRNA under both heteroallelic and monoallelic conditions. The male-mode of the fem splicing is repressed only when csd is present in the heteroallelic condition, resulting in the production of FEM-F. FEM-F induces the female-specific splicing of the A. mellifera dsx (Amdsx) gene, yielding the female-isoform of AmDSX protein (AmDSXF). AmDSXF promotes female development. On the other hand, both male and female-modes of the fem splicing occur when individuals are hemizygous or homozygous for the CSD locus. The resulting FEM-M acts as a dominant negative regulator of FEM-F, thus leading to male development through the production of the male isoform of AmDSX protein (AmDSXM) that is produced by the default splicing of Amdsx pre-mRNA.
Jdb 11 00010 g005
Table
Table 1. Primer sequences and PCR conditions used for RT-PCR.
Table 1. Primer sequences and PCR conditions used for RT-PCR.
GenePrimersSequenceDenaturationAnnealingElongationN° Cycles
fem-FfemFF1ACATTTATATTATCTGAAAAATTAG98 °C57 °C68 °C35
femFR1GCTTAGATCCTTCTCCCGTTC10 s30 s30 s
fem-MfemMF1ATTAGAATCTTCAGATGGTAC98 °C57 °C68 °C35
femMR1TATGTAAAATTTAATATATTGCAC10 s30 s30 s
csdcsdF1ATGAAACGAAATATATCAAATTATTC98 °C55 °C68 °C30
csdR1TCATTGATGCGTAGGTCCAAATC10 s30 s90 s
Amtra-2Amtra2FCAATGAGTGACATTGAGCGAAG98 °C55 °C68 °C30
Amtra2RTTAATATCGACGTGGTGAATAAG10 s30 s60 s
N° Cycles indicates number of cycles.
Table
Table 2. Primer sequences used for RIP-qPCR.
Table 2. Primer sequences used for RIP-qPCR.
TargetPrimersSequence
e2FemRIPF0TTAGACAATCACGCAGTGAAGATAG
FemRIPR0CCCGTTCTTGTTGTATCATCCATTC
e3a and e5FemRIPF1GGACCAGAAGATACTCAAGTTAGTGC
FemRIPR1CCCGTTCTTCTTTTGAGCATCACAT
e3bFemRIPF2TCAGCAGAACTCGTCAAAATGTATGT
FemRIPR2GAAACAGGCCCGGAATGCAAAAG
i5FemRIPF3ACAGAACTCATCATTGAAGATTGAC
FemRIPR3TTAAATATAATTGGCGAGTTTTTGC
EF-1αArEF-1qFTCTGTCGTGGCATCTTGAGC
ArEF-1qFTCTCCTGGGCTTCCTTCTCA
fem-FfemFqF1AACATTTATATTATCTGAAAAATTAG
femFqR1GCTTAGATCCTTCTCCCGTTC
csdcsdqF1ATGAAACGAAATATATCAAATTATTC
csdqR1TCATTGATGCGTAGGTCCAAATC
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Suzuki, Y.; Yamada, T.; Suzuki, M.G. In Vitro Comparison of Sex-Specific Splicing Efficiencies of fem Pre-mRNA under Monoallelic and Heteroallelic Conditions of csd, a Master Sex-Determining Gene in the Honeybee. J. Dev. Biol. 2023, 11, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb11010010

AMA Style

Suzuki Y, Yamada T, Suzuki MG. In Vitro Comparison of Sex-Specific Splicing Efficiencies of fem Pre-mRNA under Monoallelic and Heteroallelic Conditions of csd, a Master Sex-Determining Gene in the Honeybee. Journal of Developmental Biology. 2023; 11(1):10. https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb11010010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Suzuki, Yukihiro, Takafumi Yamada, and Masataka G. Suzuki. 2023. "In Vitro Comparison of Sex-Specific Splicing Efficiencies of fem Pre-mRNA under Monoallelic and Heteroallelic Conditions of csd, a Master Sex-Determining Gene in the Honeybee" Journal of Developmental Biology 11, no. 1: 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb11010010

APA Style

Suzuki, Y., Yamada, T., & Suzuki, M. G. (2023). In Vitro Comparison of Sex-Specific Splicing Efficiencies of fem Pre-mRNA under Monoallelic and Heteroallelic Conditions of csd, a Master Sex-Determining Gene in the Honeybee. Journal of Developmental Biology, 11(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb11010010

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop