Next Article in Journal
Principal Attitudes towards Out-of-Field Teaching Assignments and Professional Learning Needs
Previous Article in Journal
Non-Formal Education for the Inclusion of Unaccompanied Migrant Children in Italy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

An Evaluation of the Experimental Science Teaching Program for Primary Education from the Teachers’ Perspective: An Educational Design Research Journey

by
Patrícia Christine Silva
1,*,
Ana Valente Rodrigues
1 and
Paulo Nuno Vicente
2
1
Laboratório Aberto de Educação em Ciências (LEduC), Centro de Investigação em Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores, Departamento de Educação e Psicologia, Universidade de Aveiro, 3810-198 Aveiro, Portugal
2
Department of Communication, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 1069 Lisboa, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(7), 782; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070782
Submission received: 5 June 2024 / Revised: 8 July 2024 / Accepted: 12 July 2024 / Published: 17 July 2024

Abstract

The concerns about ensuring scientific literacy for all are underpinned by international recommendations from organizations such as the UN and the OECD for science education. They advocate for science education from a contextualized, sequential, systematic, and active perspective on the students’ learning process, starting from the early years of schooling. It is based on these pedagogical principles that the research project the “Experimental Science Teaching Program” (PEEC) was founded. This article aims to disseminate an evaluation of the PEEC for primary education, which includes a science teaching curriculum proposal, teaching activities and resources (e.g., digital games), and assessment record instruments for learning. This program was developed using an Educational Design Research methodological approach based on iterative cycles, with the collaboration of a multidisciplinary team (e.g., teachers, researchers, and children). For a final evaluation of the PEEC components, we consulted the ten participating teachers through a questionnaire survey one year after the end of their official collaboration. The main results highlight the relevance and appropriateness of the proposals presented for the targeted age group and the assumptions and objectives of science education in terms of the curriculum, teaching resources, and digital assessment games. Teachers also mentioned continuing to use the PEEC resources after their participation in this study. These results underscore the need to expand and promote projects of this nature to contribute to more practical science education in Portugal and, consequently, to increase children’s levels of scientific literacy.
Keywords: science teaching; educational design research; educational resources; primary education science teaching; educational design research; educational resources; primary education

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Silva, P.C.; Rodrigues, A.V.; Vicente, P.N. An Evaluation of the Experimental Science Teaching Program for Primary Education from the Teachers’ Perspective: An Educational Design Research Journey. Educ. Sci. 2024, 14, 782. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070782

AMA Style

Silva PC, Rodrigues AV, Vicente PN. An Evaluation of the Experimental Science Teaching Program for Primary Education from the Teachers’ Perspective: An Educational Design Research Journey. Education Sciences. 2024; 14(7):782. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070782

Chicago/Turabian Style

Silva, Patrícia Christine, Ana Valente Rodrigues, and Paulo Nuno Vicente. 2024. "An Evaluation of the Experimental Science Teaching Program for Primary Education from the Teachers’ Perspective: An Educational Design Research Journey" Education Sciences 14, no. 7: 782. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070782

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop