Next Article in Journal
Eulerian-Eulerian Modeling of the Features of Mean and Fluctuational Flow Structure and Dispersed Phase Motion in Axisymmetric Round Two-Phase Jets
Next Article in Special Issue
Robust H Performance Analysis of Uncertain Large-Scale Networked Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Core-EP Monotonicity Characterizations for Property-n Matrices
Previous Article in Special Issue
Solution-Space-Reduction-Based Evidence Theory Method for Stiffness Evaluation of Air Springs with Epistemic Uncertainty
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Uncertainty Analysis and Optimization Modeling with Application to Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Review

1
School of Management, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China
2
Institute of Uncertain Systems, Huanggang Normal University, Huanggang 438000, China
3
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 44221, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2023, 11(11), 2530; https://doi.org/10.3390/math11112530
Submission received: 17 April 2023 / Revised: 25 May 2023 / Accepted: 29 May 2023 / Published: 31 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Uncertainty Analysis, Decision Making and Optimization)

Abstract

:
In recent years, there have been frequent cases of impact on the stable development of supply chain economy caused by uncertain events such as COVID-19 and extreme weather events. The creation, management, and impact coping techniques of the supply chain economy now face wholly novel requirements as a result of the escalating level of global uncertainty. Although a significant literature applies uncertainty analysis and optimization modeling (UAO) to study supply chain management (SCM) under uncertainty, there is a lack of systematic literature review and research classification. Therefore, in this paper, 121 articles published in 44 international academic journals between 2015 and 2022 are extracted from the Web of Science database and reviewed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Bibliometric analysis and CiteSpace software are used to identify current developments in the field and to summarize research characteristics and hot topics. The selected published articles are classified and analyzed by author name, year of publication, application area, country, research purposes, modeling methods, research gaps and contributions, research results, and journals to comprehensively review and evaluate the SCM in the application of UAO. We find that UAO is widely used in SCM under uncertainty, especially in the field of decision-making, where it is common practice to abstractly model the decision problem to obtain scientific decision results. This study hopes to provide an important and valuable reference for future research on SCM under uncertainty. Future research could combine uncertainty theory with supply chain management segments (e.g., emergency management, resilience management, and security management), behavioral factors, big data technologies, artificial intelligence, etc.

1. Introduction

The demand generated by an increasingly competitive global economy has led to a widespread interest in supply chain (SC) and supply chain management (SCM). The exploding growth of the global economy, driven by the internet, technological innovation, and demand, has evolved the SC into a complex heterogeneous grouping [1]. SCM has evolved towards globalization, sustainability, and resilience based on the wider domestic and international environment. According to the Council of SCM Professionals, SCM comprises the full range of planned and managed sourcing and procurement, transformation, and logistics management operations [2]. In addition, it most often involves the coordination of alliances with network partners, which may include suppliers, promoters, external service providers, and customers. In essence, SCM is the co-ordination of the management of supply and demand within and between companies [2]. While SCM has always been the foundation of business, currently, it is more important than ever as a marker of business success [3,4]. In order to live and thrive in the quickly evolving, technologically driven business environment of today, businesses must manage their SCs effectively and adjust as necessary.
The growing awareness of the importance of SCM has generated substantial literature. This literature focuses on how to manage a global supply chain (GSC) (e.g., [5]), sustainability management of supply chain (e.g., [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]), closed-loop supply chain (e.g., [13]), risk management (RM) (e.g., [14,15,16]), and disruption recovery (DR) (e.g., [17]). Within the research stream of SCM globalization, Koberg and Longoni [5] provided a comprehensive analysis of the crucial components of sustainable management in GSC. Through a literature review, they identify two key elements of sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) in GSCs: the structural dimension of GSCs, i.e., SSCM configuration, and the relational dimension of GSCs, i.e., SSCM governance mechanisms. In the context of tariffs and price premiums, Chen et al. [18] analyzed the sourcing decisions of global manufacturers who maintain production sites in a competitive environment and sell their products in domestic and international markets.
There has been a considerable amount of research on SSCM. Silvestre [4] explored how SC sustainability can be implemented and managed in a developing and emerging economic environment. The paper argues that SCs in developing and emerging economies face additional sustainability challenges due to institutional weaknesses and highly variable business environments, which increase the level of complexity and uncertainty. Farooque et al. [6] classified terms related to SC sustainability and provided a unified definition of SC sustainability management. Jia et al. [7] reviewed 55 articles published between 2000 and 2019, identifying four themes in soy SSCM: drivers, global value chain management, consequences, and potential barriers. Nilsson and Goransson [8] identified, categorized, and evaluated the importance of key factors in achieving SSC innovation through a systematic review and analysis of the relevant sustainable supply chain (SSC) innovation literature. Calmon et al. [9] analyzed sustainable business strategies for innovative durable goods distributors serving customers in the supply chain, including pricing issues and distribution issues.
Risk management plays a critical role in the effective operation of SCs under various uncertainties. Numerous scholars have contributed to defining, operationalizing, and mitigating risks and SC disruptions brought on by risks over the years by concentrating on supply chain risk management (SCRM) [14]. Ho et al. [14] provided a new definition of SC risk and SCRM and proposed five common risks present in SCs based on a review and synthesis of 224 papers published in SCRM from 2003 to 2013, including macro risk, demand risk, manufacturing risk, supply risk, and infrastructure risk. Ivanov et al. [17] addressed different disruption risks and recovery measures, and the research streams of different quantitative methods and application areas are structured and classified. Behzadi et al. [15] conducted a comprehensive review of the literature on the agricultural SCRM model, identifying robustness and resilience as two key techniques for managing risk. Huang et al. [19] provided an in-depth look at how downstream purchasers work with upstream suppliers to improve accountability and reduce risk.
The COVID-19 outbreak has increased SC uncertainty for companies. Due to the dynamic and imprecise nature of COVID-19 growth, there are not enough data to adequately estimate the probability distribution of the unknown parameters [20]. In order to better cope with emergencies, companies need to grasp SC uncertainty and implement supply chain resilience management to enhance SC resilience. Abouee-Mehrizi et al. [21] considered the data-driven inventory management of a single, periodically reviewed perishable product (e.g., platelets) with zero lead time and random demand under unit residual shelf-life uncertainty. Li and Mizuno [22] studied the problem of cycle review, joint dynamic pricing, and inventory in a dual-channel SC where demand is stochastic, and price is sensitive. Niu et al. [23] examined the manufacturing or purchasing decisions of retailers under uncertain production quantities. Niu and Shen [24] proposed a programmatic model of two competing SCs to examine the question of whether manufacturers would invest in process innovation considering knowledge spillovers, absorptive capacity, and innovation uncertainty. Saberi et al. [25] modeled the interaction between firms in a heterogeneous SC under uncertainty in the price of carbon permits and carbon demand. Zhao et al. [26] investigated the recovery strategies of SC firms under uncertain demand.
In recent years, various studies have been conducted that combine different theories and methods in various areas of SCM for a systematic review. For example, quantitative method combined with empirical study [17] and structural equation modeling [27]. Guo and He [28] argued that game modeling is the most common method used in research to achieve supply chain optimization of platform services. Global supply chains face serious challenges, and uncertainties are widespread in the supply chain management process. Conventional optimization models assume that the input data are accurate, but this approach does not take into account the quality and feasibility of the model as affected by data uncertainty. In reality, the uncertainty of the parameters may affect the feasibility of the resulting solution, rendering the optimal solution meaningless in practice. However, if the effect of uncertain parameters is over-considered, the decision will often result in the decision-maker not obtaining a satisfactory value of the objective function. Therefore, the decision-maker wants to find a solution that is optimal without the influence of uncertainty parameters. In order to provide a more reasonable and accurate description of the uncertainty problem, uncertainty optimization is gradually gaining attention in the academic community. The research on SCM on the basis of uncertainty analysis and optimization modeling (UAO) is of great importance due to the different levels of uncertainty that are faced. Therefore, a review of published articles about SCM using the method of UAO is necessary to provide a comprehensive perspective for the next generation of applying UAO to the study of SCM. In this review study, we provide a systematic review and classification of articles published between 2015 and 2022 that consider UAO in the field of SCM research. Research publications prior to 2015 are excluded from this review because we aim to provide a new overview of recent trends related to the above-mentioned scope of research, and there are fewer articles that combine uncertainty and supply chain management for research prior to 2015. In addition, 2015 saw an increase in adverse factors and uncertainties in world economic performance following the low growth of world industrial production, the continued downturn in trade, and the increased turbulence in financial markets.
Most of the current literature reviewed in the most relevant fields combines supply chain risk management or a specific type of supply chain with uncertainty, and less of the literature has reviewed the uncertainty as well as its solutions in each segment of supply chain management from the perspective of the whole supply chain management. The purpose of this study is to present the application of UAO in SCM and the outlook of its future application direction in the field of the supply chain. This paper bridges this research gap and reviews the literature on optimization modeling as a method to solve uncertainty problems in supply chain management. This study attempts to address the following questions: (1) What are the main uncertainties in supply chain management? (2) What is the status of previous literature on the use of optimization modeling to solve uncertainty in supply chain management? (3) How are the three types of uncertainty methods applied in different areas of the supply chain?
Figure 1 illustrates the research framework of this paper. In terms of analysis, this study carefully and systematically searched research papers involving UAO in SC published from 2015 to 2022, categorized and summarized them for analysis, and then assessed the future research potential of UAO. The top dashed boxes denote the research methodology, while the three solid boxes in the center, linked by thick black arrows, represent the primary research content at various stages.
The rest of the article is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present the theory of UAO and its development. The literature search process and the research analysis methods used in this paper are briefly summarized in Section 3. In Section 4 and Section 5, all selected articles are summarized and reviewed according to different criteria. Section 6 and Section 7 describe the research findings, conclusions, future directions, and limitations.

2. The Evolution of Uncertainty Analysis and Optimization Modeling

As the intersection of combinatorial optimization and uncertainty theory, uncertain network optimization problems have been a hot topic of research. The shortest route problem, minimum spanning tree problem, and other common network optimization issues come in a wide variety. Numerous researchers have been motivated to model network optimization issues mathematically by these appealing challenges [29,30]. When the sample size is too small or when there is no population for calculating a probability distribution, we must enlist the assistance of subject-matter experts in order to determine their level of confidence that each event will occur [31]. Although the probability is one of the theories most commonly used by scholars and practitioners to model uncertainty and subsequently explore the principles inherent in random occurrences, it may not be adequate to address all types of uncertainty associated with unique human beliefs. However, it may not be adequate for addressing virtually all types of uncertainty, especially those associated with unique human beliefs, as it may lead to counterintuitive results [32]. In order to distinguish it from randomness, this phenomenon is called uncertainty [33]. To better deal with this uncertainty, Liu [34] proposed uncertainty theory, which thus became a branch of mathematics to model uncertainty through trustworthiness. Zhou et al. [35] analyzed a review of 1004 journal papers in the field of uncertainty from 2008 to 2019 to derive seven key sub-fields of uncertainty theory and their research potential. The study finds a linear growth trend in the literature of uncertainty theory, involving an extensive network of 1000 scholars published in 300 journals worldwide, indicating the growing attractiveness of uncertainty theory and its gradual expansion of academic influence.
Mathematical models typically explain engineering problems, and in order to solve these models, it is often assumed that the parameters in the mathematical models are deterministic. However, in practical applications, many parameters are difficult to obtain accurately, leading to uncertainty in the parameters. The response of the theoretical analysis may differ considerably from the actual situation because of uncertain parameters. Consideration of uncertainty in design optimization enhances the design solution’s dependability and durability. UAO can be dated back to the 1950s [36,37], and research in this area has proliferated since then [38].
Based on different theories, uncertainty methods can be classified into three categories, as follows:
(1) Uncertainty programming based on probability theory. Probability theory, a branch of mathematics, deals with the analysis of random phenomena. A random phenomenon is such an objective phenomenon that when one observes it, the result obtained cannot be predetermined, but is only one of many possible outcomes. The outcome of a random event cannot be determined before it occurs. However, it may be any one of several possible outcomes. The actual outcome is considered to be determined by chance. The keyword for uncertainty programming based on probability theory is random.
(2) Uncertainty programming based on fuzzy set theory. Fuzzy set theory is a research method that deals with problems related to fuzzy, subjective, and imprecise judgments, which quantifies linguistic aspects of available data and preferences for individual or group decisions. This method treats the object to be examined and the fuzzy concepts reflecting it as a certain fuzzy set, establishes an appropriate affiliation function, and analyzes the fuzzy object through the relevant operations and transformations of the fuzzy set. Fuzzy set theory is based on fuzzy mathematics to study phenomena related to non-exactness. The keyword for uncertainty programming based on fuzzy set theory is fuzzy.
(3) Uncertainty programming based on uncertainty theory. Expert confidence-based data are concerned with the subjective judgments of different experts about the likelihood of an uncertain event occurring. Such judgments are different from the random sampling studied in classical statistics. Therefore, it is not appropriate to directly adopt the framework of classical statistics for statistical inference. Liu [34] proposed an uncertainty theory to build a basis for solving the analysis problem of such data. The theory introduces uncertain variables to portray uncertain phenomena by establishing a new axiomatic system, which mainly includes uncertainty measures, uncertain variables and their distributions, and inverse distributions and applications. The keyword of uncertainty planning based on uncertainty theory is uncertain.
The difference between these three uncertainty approaches is that both probability theory and uncertainty theory try to model the degree of human beliefs, the former using possibility measurement tools and the latter using uncertainty measurement tools [39]. Nevertheless, the fuzzy theory, on the other hand, considers that the degree of belief is a subjective probability or a fuzzy set.

3. Research Methodology

In our retrospective study, combined with the visualization tool CiteSpace and bibliometric analysis, we complete the three main steps of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), including literature search, article eligibility, data extraction, and summarization. CiteSpace presents the structure, patterns, and distribution of scientific knowledge in a visual way, and this software is now widely used to analyze changes in research hotspots and trends. PRISMA is a set of standard specifications established for the quality of systematic reviews and is applicable to analyses of published papers using primary data sources, with the aim of improving the objectivity and consistency of systematic reviews.

3.1. Literature Search

In this phase, we demonstrate the use of UAO in SCM using the well-known database Web of Science (WoS). The database is chosen for several reasons. First, it meets the two core quality criteria for literature databases required in leading literature review approaches, such as those of Tranfield et al. [40] and Fink [41]. (1) The scope of the database is consistent with our study design and questions. WoS provides access to over 22,000 journals from all major publishers. This is probably the broadest range of high-quality scientific journals of any database [42]. In addition, it is one of the most complete and most cited reference databases in the field of supply chain management [43]. (2) This data is compiled in a database that can be searched in a consistent manner using Boolean operators to construct customized search strings. Thus, we can provide a consistent set of literature covering the topics of supply chain management and uncertainty in the present paper. Second, the database is widely considered to be the standard and most widely used tool for generating citation data for scientific research and other evaluation purposes [44], and bibliometric studies frequently use the Web of Science as their data source [45]. Finally, Wang and Waltman [46] compared the data coverage of WoS, Scopus, and Google Scholar, respectively. The results of the study showed that the journal classification system of WoS is more accurate and, therefore, superior to the other systems. Consistent with Xu et al. [47] and Saini et al. [48], the authors rely on WoS because it guarantees standardization, credibility, and high-quality publications and ensures the quality of the analyzed papers. Searching by topic “supply chain management” and “uncertainty”, restricting the paper type to “review literature”, “SCM”, “sustainable SCM”, “supply chain network design (SCND)”, “emergency network optimization”, “logistics network optimization”, “SCN disruption”, and “closed-loop SCM” appear more frequently in the titles. The literature search, therefore, uses these seven keywords (specifically examining the period of COVID-19 when studying supply chain disruption), as well as uncertainty and optimization modeling, to gather the available literature for the period 2015–2022. According to our strategic search, a total of 6591 academic papers are extracted. The following stage is looking for duplicate papers with redundant information, reducing the number to the remaining 275 documents. After that, we exclude irrelevant papers, leaving 153 papers after filtering by title and abstract. We add 18 classic papers for reference, keeping just the final 171 potentially pertinent publications for review (see Figure 2). In this paper, each article is reviewed according to Amstar entries in the final step of the literature search to determine the final articles used for this review paper.

3.2. Article Eligibility

In order to qualify, we independently review the entire text of each paper that was taken from the previous step in this review process. We carefully select the pertinent items for which consensus has been established in the last step. Literature that considers uncertainty in SCM or has applied UAO is selected, excluding unpublished working papers, editor’s notes, master’s theses, doctoral dissertations, textbooks, and non-English papers. Previous studies considered other approaches to SCM, such as quantitative analysis, so in this step, we also exclude these studies. Finally, we select 121 articles related to UAO methods in SCM that meet the inclusion criteria from 44 international academic journals from 2015 to 2022. We use CiteSpace software to analyze the keyword, and author of the de-duplicated articles, as shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively.

3.3. Data Extraction and Summarizing

A total of 121 papers are reviewed and distilled in the literature as the final step of our methodology. In the subsequent analysis, all chosen articles are classified into different categories, including general SCM, sustainable SCM, SCND, emergency network optimization, logistics network optimization, closed-loop SCM, and SCN disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic period (see Table 1). In addition, the literature is synthesized and evaluated according to a variety of standards, such as authors’ names, year of publication, application areas, countries, research objectives, modeling methods, research gaps and contributions, research results, and journals in which they appear. Moreover, we consider this review article to be meticulously crafted and a thorough resource on the application of the UAO to SCM. Therefore, we need to go through the article in its entirety and conduct a more in-depth study with more details in order to fully analyze the application of UAO in the field of SCM. Although the selection process is time consuming, it allows us to identify the most appropriate publications.

4. Distribution of Articles by Journal, Year of Publication, and Nationality of Authors

4.1. Distribution of Articles by Journal

The distribution of selected articles by journal is presented in Table 2. The articles related to UAO and SCM issues are selected from 44 different international academic journals in the Web of Science database. As shown in Table 2, Computers & Industrial Engineering and Journal of Cleaner Production tie for the top ranking with 11 papers among the 44 journals. The finding also indicates that these two journals contribute more to the application of UAO in SCM. International Journal of Production Research ranks second with 10 papers. Annals of Operations Research, in addition, ranked third with eight articles. Among the other journal rankings, Omega, an international journal with seven published papers ranks fourth, and Soft Computing has six published papers tied for fifth place. Table 2 demonstrates the distribution of other selected literature.

4.2. Distribution of Articles by Year of Publication

In recent years, the use of UAO in SCM has been increasing. There has been a long-standing historical growth rate of UAO in SCM concerns. Based on the frequency of distribution by year of publication, Figure 5 depicts the pertinent evidence. The results show that the amount of literature on UAO applications in SCM has increased from 2015 to 2022. The results in this section indicate that 4 articles in 2015 had references to UAO, and 14 articles did so in 2017. In 2018 and 2019, each year had 12 articles on UAO and SCM, a minor decrease from 2017. Starting in 2019, the number of studies on UAO and SCM will increase annually. In addition, the number of papers published between 2020 and 2021 increased from 15 to 30 in one year. This shows that UAO is currently being used by researchers in different areas of SCM and that this number is expected to increase in the coming years.

4.3. Distribution of Papers by Nationality of Authors

We also provide the findings from the analysis of the writers’ nationalities. Table 3 lists authors using UAO in SCM from 20 different countries, which are shown in Figure 6. The most published papers are from China (49.18%), followed by Iran (18.03%). The study found that Chinese authors are more interested in research on UAO and SCM, especially in recent years.

5. Publication Areas Classification

Pishvaee et al. [49] proposed a RO model to deal with the inherent uncertainty of the input data for the CLSCND problem. Initially, a deterministic mixed-integer linear programming model for CLSCND is developed. The robust equivalent of the mixed-integer linear programming model is then demonstrated using the most recent extensions of RO theory. Finally, in order to evaluate the robustness of the solutions derived from the new RO model, they are compared with some implementations of the deterministic mixed integer linear programming model under different test problems. Lalmazloumian et al. [50] also developed a robust mixed integer linear programming model to study the agile manufacturing firm in a make-to-order production environment for the supply chain planning problem and used a scenario-based RO approach to absorb the effects of uncertain parameters and variables. Shabani and Sowlati [51] put forward a hybrid multi-stage SO-RO model for maximizing the SC of a forest biomass power plant with uncertainty. Zokaee et al. [52] addressed the uncertainty in demand, supply capacity, and key cost data. A RO model for SSND is proposed to minimize the total SC cost to determine the optimal siting and allocation strategy.
In this era of black swans, events such as the “car core shortage” and the “shipping shutdown” have overturned many traditional SCM concepts and “uncertainty” has become an element that has to be considered when designing SCs. Uncertainty is not a concept that has only emerged in recent years. The term “VUCA”, i.e., Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, and Ambiguous, which emerged in the 1990s, refers to uncertainty, which has become the norm in SCM due to the high number of unexpected events, high demand for volatility, and high demand for agile response. Klibi et al. [53] reviewed the optimization models proposed in the literature. They state that the model developed should strike a balance between realism and manageability or solvability, using data available in typical real-world situations.
Today’s world is increasingly characterized by VUCA, i.e., instability, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity. The uncertainty faced by SCs is increasing, and SCs are facing more and more unexpected risks, which can easily lead to SC disruptions [54]. The industry is increasingly concerned with SC safety and security, is committed to dealing with uncertainty in a variety of ways to enhance the SC’s resilience, and has conducted extensive research on this topic using UAO methods. For example, Saghaei et al. [55] constructed a two-stage stochastic mixed integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) model incorporating opportunity constraints to minimize the total cost of woody biomass power generation in a four-stage integrated bioenergy SC that allows the supply chain to remain resilient in the presence of disruptions. Razavi et al. [56] modeled the crisis response management phase using a multi-objective mathematical model under conditions of uncertainty. Uncertain data generated under disaster conditions are treated with a RO methodology. In light of this, a hybrid solution method based on a genetic algorithm and multiple-choice objective planning is proposed. Foroozesh et al. [57] designed new multi-objective mixed-integer linear programming models for multi-product, multi-cycle, multimodal G-elastic SCs by proposing new strategies to minimize the impact of disruptions. Subsequently, using credibility measures and affiliation functions of generalized interval type II fuzzy variables, a new robust possibility planning strategy is suggested to respond with facility supply capacity, customer demand, transportation cost, and CO2 emission issues.
We grouped and combined articles that considered both UAO and SCM into seven different application areas, including general SCM, sustainable SCM, closed-loop SCM, SCND, emergency network optimization, logistics network optimization, and SCN disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic. In the next sections, all selected articles are summarized and reviewed according to different criteria, including author name, uncertainty conditions, research objectives, modeling methods, research gaps and contributions, and research results.

5.1. Distribution Papers Based on General SCM

In a highly competitive and changing market environment, there are many uncertainties in SCM. In fact, there are three main types of uncertainty in the SC: supply uncertainty, cost uncertainty, and demand uncertainty.
Among the articles in this field selected for this study, Refs. [27,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73] applied uncertainty methods based on uncertainty theory. For example, Liu et al. [49,50] studied the supply risk from suppliers. In their paper published in 2020, they investigated the optimal decision choice of a retailer when the primary supplier faces supply uncertainty, and the output of the alternate supplier is infinite or uncertain [58]. Subsequently, in 2021, a brand-new idea known as the channel supply risk level (SRL) was put forth to measure the channel supply risk that arises from supply uncertainty [59]. To explore the impact of environmental uncertainty on decision-makers’ behavior, Farham-Nia and Ghaffari-Hadigheh [65] described the demand function as a price-dependent, service-dependent, and channel-dependent uncertainty function to investigate the optimal pricing decision for SCs with dual distribution channels in centralized and decentralized decision systems. Ke et al. [70] proposed uncertainty measures to deal with these artificial degrees of trust and used three uncertainty planning models to derive how channel members should make pricing decisions under three power structures.
Refs. [74,75] applied the uncertainty method based on probability theory. Zhao et al. [74] studied supply chain coordination based on incomplete contracts by using production costs as a random variable. Ma et al. [75] looked at the distribution of substitutable goods to the same market with a pricing decision dilemma by two risk-sensitive makers in an uncertain environment using a shared dominant and risk-neutral retailer.
Based on the above literature and previous studies, Table 4 shows the results of the value distribution of UAO based on the authors’ names, uncertainty conditions, research objectives, modeling methods, research gaps and contributions, and research results. The finding in this table indicates that 19 papers applied the UAO method in the general SCM, and most of them used confidence levels for uncertainty analysis and decision modeling. The information for all articles published in the field of general SCM is included in Table 4.

5.2. Distribution Papers Based on Sustainable SCM

The most common definition of SSCM is the process of managing SCM activities while considering environmental, economic, and social challenges to advance the long-term financial objectives of specific enterprises and their SCs [76]. Green SCs are closely related to environmental issues in SSC, and many scholars have studied the optimization of Green SCs in an uncertain environment.
Among the articles in this field selected for this study, Refs. [77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85] applied uncertainty methods based on uncertainty theory. For example, Shen [79] studied a two-level Green SC network in an uncertain environment where the market base, customer demand, production cost, and sensitivity to price are assumed to be uncertain variables. A food SSC network that considered the three facets of sustainability (economic, social, and environmental) was designed by Krishnan et al. [82] using an integrated resilient multi-objective optimization model while considering the perishability of the food SC, the valuing of food waste, and the uncertainty of supply.
Refs. [85,86,87,88] applied an uncertainty method based on fuzzy set theory. In these, Zhang et al. [85] focused on social aspects, the effectiveness of relief efforts, and financial costs. For the problem of designing a sustainable last-mile relief network in the face of partial probabilistic uncertainty, a multi-objective distributed RO model is designed. For the pharmaceutical SCND problem in uncertain environments, Zahiri et al. [86] came up with a new multi-objective integrated sustainable-resilient mixed integer linear programming model.
Refs. [89,90,91] applied uncertainty method based on probability theory. To study the impact of uncertainty on decision variables in SSCs, Shen [89] developed a multi-objective opportunity constraint model under uncertainty scenarios. Jabbarzadeh et al. [90] put forward a delayed strategy with the RO model for efficient Green SC planning. Kazancoglu et al. [91] examined the reactivity of sustainable GSCs during the COVID-19 pandemic while concentrating on the resilience of sustainable (GSCs) to prevent disruptions brought on by epidemics like COVID-19.
For the literature cited above and previous articles, Table 5 displays the results of the significant distribution of UAO based on author name, uncertainty condition, research purpose, modeling methods, research gap and contribution, and research results. This table reveals that 16 articles utilized the UAO approach in the SSCM. Table 5 provides additional information on the articles published in the SSCM field.

5.3. Distribution Papers Based on Supply Chain Network Design

SCND is one of the most critical planning problems in SCM. SCND under uncertainty has received considerable attention from both theoretical and practical communities in recent years [92]. To design SCN under uncertainty, numerical optimization processes based on SC objectives often consider single or multiple objectives. In this section, we address UAO in SCND in terms of mathematical models, solution approaches, and optimization techniques, mainly including SCND problems with continuous stochastic parameters, risk measures in the context of SCND, RO in the context of SCND, fuzzy mathematical planning in SCND environment, and SCND optimization methods with interruptions.
Among the articles in this field selected for this study, Govindan et al. [92] explored existing optimization techniques for dealing with uncertainty, such as recourse-based stochastic programming, risk-averse stochastic programming, robust optimization, and fuzzy mathematical programming in terms of mathematical modeling and solution approaches.
Refs. [93,94,95,96,97,98] applied uncertainty method based on uncertainty theory. For example, Tirkolaee et al. [94] attempted to optimally a multilevel blood SC under uncertainty in demand, capacity, and blood disposal rates. Yan and Ji [96] developed an uncertainty planning model to design a three-level SCN with disruption risk, where disruptions are considered uncertain events. There are also studies that consider both stochastic planning and RO methods.
Refs. [99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106] applied uncertainty method based on fuzzy set theory. In these, Salehi et al. [103] used the optimization approach to design a resilient and sustainable bioenergy supply network based on the uncertainty of bioenergy demand and the disturbance of biorefineries. Yang and Liu [98] studied the SCND problem under uncertainty, where both customer demand and transportation cost are characterized by fuzzy variables with known likelihood distributions.
Refs. [107,108,109,110,111] applied uncertainty method based on probability theory. For the SCND problem under uncertainty, Yang and Liu [109] constructed a new equilibrium optimization method. The approach uses probability and likelihood distributions to describe the unknown transportation costs and client demand, respectively.
Based on the above discussion, Table 6 shows the results of the significant distribution of UAO based on author names, uncertainty conditions, research objectives, modeling methods, research gaps and contributions, and research results. The result provided in this table indicates that 21 previous studies used UAO in the area of SCND. The information in Table 6 pertains to articles published in the field of SCND.

5.4. Distribution Papers Based on Emergency Network Optimization

Emergency SCM is the process of planning and executing the efficient and cost-effective transportation of supplies (including food, water, medicine, etc.) from the place of production to the disaster zone for effective distribution and application to the affected population in the face of disasters and uncertain environments. Emergency SCM is a vital component of the emergency management system for public health emergencies and the prerequisite for constructing a flawless emergency management system.
Among the articles in this field selected for this study, Refs. [112,113,114,115,116,117,118] applied uncertainty method based on uncertainty theory. For example, Li et al. [112] employed uncertainty planning methods to deal with the medical material dispatching problem in emergency events. Zhang et al. [116] investigated the site-routing issue for a sustainable multi-depot emergency facility. Using uncertainty theory, an uncertain multi-objective emergency response site-route planning model that considers travel time, emergency response costs, and CO2 emissions is developed.
Refs. [119,120,121] applied uncertainty method based on fuzzy set theory. In these, Wang and Sun [119] established a multi-cycle homogeneous procurement optimization model under uncertainty to obtain optimal emergency supply deployment. Zhu et al. [121] put forward a collaborative optimization model based on a comprehensive evaluation framework for emergency supply suppliers using interval type-II fuzzy sets for the uncertainty and fuzziness of disaster relief information.
Refs. [122,123,124,125,126] applied uncertainty method based on probability theory. Vaezi et al. [123] investigated the design of emergency networks for railroad hazardous materials transportation under uncertainty and proposed a two-stage stochastic planning model to determine the storage locations of response facilities and equipment packages. Song et al. [125] investigated the SC operation of rescue equipment in disaster relief under demand uncertainty. The goal is to minimize total and peak delays in product delivery within a multi-period plan.
Based on the above literature and previous papers, Table 7 provides valuable information about UAO based on the authors’ names, uncertainty conditions, research objectives, modeling methods, research gaps and contributions, and research results. The result of Table 7 shows that 14 scholars have conducted research on UAO in the field of emergency network optimization in the past. Table 7 provides some highlights of published research in the area of emergency network optimization.

5.5. Distribution Papers Based on Logistics Network Optimization

Logistics network optimization plays a crucial role in modern logistics planning and SCND [127]. Logistics managers may greatly increase the effectiveness of the overall freight transportation system and more effectively and promptly meet the needs of their clients with the help of well-designed transportation and logistics networks. Many scholars have studied issues related to logistics network optimization, including sustainable logistics network design issues, RL network design, collaborative logistics network design], and transportation problems.
Among the articles in this field selected for this study, Refs. [128,129,130,131,132,133] applied uncertainty method based on uncertainty theory. For example, Govindan and Golizadeh [128] studied the robust network design of a sustainable, resilient RL network based on big data using end-of-life vehicles as an example. Chen et al. [131] examined a class of uncertain two-particle solid transportation problems, where supply demand, transportation capacity, transportation cost, and transportation time are considered uncertain variables. Based on the two types of methods for ordering uncertain variables, an expectation value objective planning model and an opportunity-constrained objective planning model for the two-particle solids transportation problem are developed, respectively.
Refs. [134,135,136,137] applied uncertainty method based on fuzzy set theory. In these, a new scenario-based resilient bi-objective optimization model for logistics networks was developed by Sun et al. [133]. It incorporates the placement of medical facilities, the transfer of casualties, and the distribution of aid materials while taking triage into account. Gupta et al. [137] explored the multi-objective optimization of a multi-product SCN logistics problem in an intuitionistic fuzzy environment to optimally obtain the best distribution order for products from different sources and destinations.
Refs. [138,139,140,141,142] applied uncertainty method based on probability theory. In order to help decision-makers select the best collaborative logistics network design option under uncertainty, Xu et al. [140] suggested a general two-stage quantitative methodology. Jiang et al. [141] investigated the problem of designing regional multi-modal logistics networks with CO2 reduction targets and uncertain demand in the context of urban cluster development.
Based on the above literature and previous papers, Table 8 shows valuable information about the UAO model based on the authors’ names, uncertainty conditions, research objectives, modeling methods, research gaps and contributions, and research results. The result of Table 8 shows that 15 papers have studied UAO in the field of logistics network optimization in the past. Table 8 provides some highlights of the published research in the area of logistics network optimization.

5.6. Distribution Papers Based on Closed-Loop SCM

CLSCM refers to all forward logistics in the SC (e.g., material procurement, production, and distribution) and RL in collecting and disposing of returned (used or unused) products and/or product components to ensure socioeconomic and ecologically sustainable recovery [143]. In the last decade, CLSCM has attracted considerable attention from industry and academia.
Among the articles in this field selected for this study, Refs. [144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151] applied uncertainty method based on uncertainty theory. For example, Goltsos et al. [144] and Peng et al. [145] conducted review studies of the literature related to CLSC and uncertainty. Goltsos et al. [144] conducted a systematic review of the literature in the field of CLSC dynamics in uncertain environments, which investigates how material and information fluxes interact over time in the various supply chain components for remanufacturing. Peng et al. [145] reviewed earlier research on uncertainty in the fundamental properties of CLSCs, examined the factors that contribute to uncertainty at different stages of production and chose the most effective methods to measure its effects.
Refs. [152,153,154] applied uncertainty method based on fuzzy set theory. In these, Kisomi et al. [152] built an integrated mathematical planning model based on RO theory to address the uncertain environment in these two problems. Considering global factors such as exchange rates and tariffs, Amin and Baki [154] developed a mathematical model of a CLSC. The model is a mixed integer linear programming model with several objectives and uncertain demand. SC integration and supplier selection are two important strategic decision problems in SCM.
Refs. [155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162] applied the uncertainty method based on probability theory. Gholizadeh et al. [156] studied a multi-layered CLSC for a disposable appliance recycling network, using discrete stochastic situations with uncertainty in demand and cost parameters. Dutta et al. [160] constructed a recycling framework using buy-back offers at the retailer level. For the purpose of helping to meet the minimum recycling requirements established by legislators and reduce the overall cost of the integrated system, the suggested recycling framework is combined with a multi-period CLSC optimization model with uncertain demand and capacity to determine the best recycling price to offer to consumers.
Based on the above statements about the field of CLSCM, Table 9 provides valuable information about the UAO method based on the authors’ names, uncertainty conditions, research objectives, modeling methods, research gaps and contributions, and research results. The result of Table 9 demonstrates that 19 scholars have applied UAO in CLSCM research in the past. Some of the key points from the published studies in the area of CLSCM are presented in Table 9.

5.7. Distribution Papers Based on Supply Chain Network Disruption during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Public emergencies have a significant impact on SCs, and the COVID-19 pandemic led to a huge impact and influence on economic trade in countries around the world. The issue of SC disruptions once again became a global concern. Scholars have studied SC disruptions in the context of the epidemic, and extensive research has been conducted into coping strategies for SCs.
Among the articles in this field selected for this study, Refs. [163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172] applied uncertainty methods based on uncertainty theory. For example, in a two-supplier-one-retailer SC setting, Gupta et al. [164] studied the impact of supply capacity disruption times on pricing decisions for alternative products. They derived optimal pricing strategies and order levels that considered both disruption times and product substitution. Rahman et al. [170] examined a consistent set of strategies and recovery plans to minimize costs and maximize the availability of necessary items to cope with GSC disruptions.
Ref. [173] applied an uncertainty method based on fuzzy set theory. In order to observe the elasticity of economic sectors and rank them using three predefined categories, Kan et al. [173] proposed using a new fuzzy method, VIKORSort.
Refs. [174,175,176,177,178,179,180] applied uncertainty methods based on probability theory. A two-layer optimization model was created by Timonina-Farkas et al. [174] that took demand uncertainty and production disruptions into account. This model took into account how opportunity limitations and dual probability service level demand affected the connection between demand distribution and production disruptions. Optimization models that consider production uncertainty and enable the identification of elasticity strategies are essential to mitigate SC disruptions. Liu et al. [176] investigated a new disruption propagation management problem for a multilevel SC with a limited intervention budget. The goal was to reduce the risk of interruption as determined by the SC’s target participants’ likelihood of disturbance.
Based on current literature and previously published articles on SCN disruption during COVID-19, Table 10 shows the significant distribution of authors’ names, uncertainty conditions, research objectives, modeling method, research gaps and contributions, and UAO of research results. As can be observed from the table, 18 scholars have applied the UAO approach in the past in their studies of SCN disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic. Table 10 provides some highlights of published research in the area of SCN disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic.

6. Findings and Discussions

Our findings show that UAO is an effective decision-making tool when faced with SCM uncertainties, such as uncertainty in demand and uncertainty in costs. Combined with the fact that companies often try to make optimal decisions that satisfy as many objectives as possible, the current environment is characterized by a variety of uncertainties. The UAO approach is frequently utilized in SCM because it can easily handle multi-objective function problems with unclear parameters, which is undoubtedly an appealing characteristic for most researchers. The UAO approach is used to find the best solution when complexity and uncertainty are present. Once the ideal answer has been found, it is converted into suggestions for management decisions.
In addition, the main sources of uncertainty in SCM are supply and demand uncertainty, cost uncertainty, and supply chain disruption risk, and decision-makers often need to make optimal decisions under these uncertainties. According to the results of this review, UAO frequently models the decision problem abstractly before utilizing the appropriate optimization techniques to solve it. This practice is carried out in order to produce scientific decision results in the field of decision-making in SCM. Among the three methods of uncertainty modeling for an optimal solution, RO is the most widely used in SCM, followed by SO.
The construction of RO models has been proposed in the literature, such as characterizing the risk due to uncertainty with confidence in the uncertainty theory. Therefore, future research can extend the results of these models to study supply chain risk contingency management under unexpected contingencies in order to assess risks more effectively and make optimal decisions more quickly. In addition, the literature has used RO models, multi-objective opportunity constraint models recognized uncertainty modeling paradigms, and multi-objective particle swarm optimization solution methods that can only optimize algorithms to solve decision-making problems in SSC. In the future, the conventional paradigm of uncertainty modeling can be combined with big data and algorithms to study green modern digital intelligence SCM in uncertain environments.
Moreover, transportation problems under uncertainty have been studied in the literature, and the expected value model and chance-constrained programming model have been constructed. Future research can combine these models with transportation-related big data to study the optimal design of logistics networks. The SC disruption problem during the COVID-19 pandemic has also been studied in the literature, and various optimization models have been constructed to enhance SC resilience and mitigate SC disruption. After the SC crisis caused by COVID-19, the EU focused its industrial policy on increasing the SC resilience of industrial chains. We should keep an eye on the latest developments in EU industrial policy, analyze and assess any potential effects on China’s SC and industrial chain, plan appropriate responses, and intensify efforts to build resilient SC and industrial chain policies. Therefore, future research can be conducted in the direction of SC resilience management under the impact of a global epidemic. In addition, the theme of promoting high-quality development should be adopted, and efforts should be made to improve the resilience and safety of industrial chains and SCs, as pointed out in the report of the 20th National Congress. Therefore, an important research direction is also the SC safety management of industrial chains under unexpected emergency events. There is also some literature that utilizes the UAO approach in order to obtain the maximization of SC performance based on economic, environmental, social, and other sustainability indicators. In this regard, similar studies can be conducted to consider maximizing SC performance from different perspectives, while UAO can be applied together with some other complex methods, such as game theory. In addition, uncertainty in the attitudes of SC members toward risk has been studied in the literature. In addition to the uncertainty of the external environment, there is also a large amount of uncertainty in the behavior of SC members, such as overconfidence and risk aversion, so UAO can be applied to study the SCM based on behavioral factors in an uncertain environment.

7. Conclusions and Recommendations

Whether it is due to the increase of uncertainty in the external environment, such as natural disasters, political impact, or major public health events, or the increase of uncertainty in the internal environment, such as product quality, lack of capacity, etc., all lead to the increase of uncertainty in supply chain management, and how to effectively deal with and reduce losses after the occurrence of uncertainty in supply chain management is a key challenge for relevant companies. It is a key challenge for the enterprises concerned to deal with the supply chain management uncertainty effectively and reduce the loss after it occurs. By reviewing the literature on the application of UAO in various areas of supply chain management, we provide scholars and practitioners with understanding, decision ideas and insights and future directions on the effective implementation of UAO in SCM under uncertainty.
We tried to classify these papers into the following seven application areas: general SCM, sustainable SCM, SCND, emergency network optimization, logistics network optimization, CLSCM, and SC disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results show that 19 papers apply the UAO approach to general SCM, and 15 studies used the UAO approach in sustainable SCM. In addition, 20 papers applied the UAO approach in the area of CLSCM. A further result shows that 18 studies of papers related to the UAO approach have been conducted in the area of SC disruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, 20, 15 and 15 papers have applied the UAO approach in the areas of SCND, emergency network optimization, and logistics network optimization, respectively. In the above literature, the main sources of uncertainty are as follows: (1) uncertainty in demand due to factors such as fierce market competition and variable consumer demand makes it difficult for supply chain companies to obtain full information about the market demand, (2) supply-side uncertainty due to uncertainty in supplier supply quality, quantity, and extended delivery time, and (3) operating cost uncertainty, risk uncertainty, and disruption uncertainty are caused by various internal and external environmental factors. This study only addresses the literature that uses the UAO method for the management of different SCs and different aspects of SCM. Therefore, other methods can be considered for further research in the application of SCM.
In terms of journal distribution, Computers & Industrial Engineering and Journal of Cleaner Production tie for first place with 11 articles, and Annals of Operations Research ranks third with nine articles related to UAO methodology and SCM. In terms of ethnicity-based classification, there are 20 ethnicities and countries applying the UAO approach to SCM issues. Finally, among SCM, Chinese scholars published the most contributions of UAO-related papers, followed by Iran.
The findings of the study indicate that the UAO method is appropriate for resolving uncertainty in SCM. By merging the academic literature on SCM under uncertainty and reviewing the outcomes of UAO research in many application domains, we obtain a better knowledge of both the specific results and the solution to uncertainty problems in SCM. These results are intended to contribute to SCM and UAO literature and to assist academic researchers and managers in SCM areas where uncertainty exists to make optimal decisions in SCM through modeling and optimal resolution of uncertainty.
The theoretical contributions of this paper are to complement the existing literature by demonstrating the application of the UAO approach to SCM and to validate the applicability and importance of the uncertainty model optimization approach in the field of supply chain management. By summarizing the application of UAO in the seven areas of supply chain management subdivided in this paper, an overview of UAO research in these areas is derived, with relatively more research applying UAO methods in the areas of general SCM, CLSCM, and SCND. Many unexpected events, high demand volatility, and high demand for agile response have become the norm in supply chain management. Supply chain uncertainty optimization enables supply chains to operate as planned. The practical contributions of this paper are to provide a reference for researchers in this research direction of uncertainty and supply chain management in the future by reviewing the literature on the use of uncertainty optimization models to solve uncertainty problems in supply chain management, which in turn enlightens decision-makers to better solve a series of uncertainty problems in SCM, improve the efficiency of decision-making, and keep the supply chain stable.
Like with any study, this article contains some limitations that can be considered in future investigations. These limitations can provide opportunities and suggestions for future research. First, this study divided the 121 articles into seven application areas. We recommend that future research reviews papers in different subfields of these categories. Second, this paper reviews the application of UAO in various areas of SCM and identifies the most used UAO and its solution methods for SCM uncertainty problem solving, mainly the three more traditional optimization modeling solution paradigms of SO, chance constraint, and RO. In this regard, it is recommended that other number-wise techniques be used in future research for modeling solution optimization analysis of uncertainty problems in SCM. Third, the data were collected from journals, and the literature does not include textbooks, PhD and MSc theses and dissertations, or unpublished papers on UAO methods and SCM. As a result, information for future studies can be gathered from these sources, and the results can then be compared with the findings and reports of previous research. Fourth, the paper presents the selection and summary of articles by different publishers in the Web of Science. However, it is possible that some of the relevant outlets are still outside the scope of this study. Therefore, the evaluation of papers that were not part of the present study should be the subject of future research. Fifth, this research reviews numerous journal articles that describe the use of the UAO methodology to supply management concerns. Nevertheless, this review does not include recently published book-length approaches. Finally, this paper classifies papers based on seven different areas of SCM rather than different uncertainty analysis modeling optimization solution methods, so the classification of papers based on the UAO approach needs further study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.C. and J.P.; formal analysis, L.C., T.D., J.P. and D.R.; funding acquisition, L.C. and J.P.; investigation, T.D.; methodology, L.C. and T.D.; project administration, L.C. and D.R.; resources, J.P.; software, T.D.; supervision, L.C., J.P. and D.R.; validation, L.C. and J.P.; visualization, L.C.; writing—original draft, T.D.; writing—review and editing, L.C., T.D., J.P. and D.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by research grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 72102171 and 61873108), the National Statistical Science Research Project of China (No. 2022LY058), and the Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Foundation, the Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (No. 21YJC630006).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, L.; Nan, G.; Liu, Q.; Peng, J.; Ming, J. How do consumer fairness concerns affect an e-commerce platform’s choice of selling scheme? J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2022, 17, 1075–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Janvier-James, A.M. A new introduction to supply chains and SCM: Definitions and theories perspective. Int. Bus. Res. 2012, 5, 194–207. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen, L.; Dong, T.; Nan, G.; Xiao, Q.; Xu, M.; Ming, J. Impact of the introduction of marketplace channel on e-tailer’s logistics service strategy. Manag. Decis. Econ. 2023, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Silvestre, B.S. Sustainable SCM in emerging economies: Environmental turbulence, institutional voids and sustainability trajectories. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015, 167, 156–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Koberg, E.; Longoni, A. A systematic review of sustainable SCM in global supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 207, 1084–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Farooque, M.; Zhang, A.; Thürer, M.; Qu, T.; Huisingh, D. Circular SCM: A definition and structured literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 228, 882–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jia, F.; Peng, S.; Green, J.; Koh, L.; Chen, X. Soybean SCM and sustainability: A systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 255, 120254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nilsson, F.; Göransson, M. Critical factors for the realization of sustainable supply chain innovations-model development based on a systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 296, 126471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Calmon, A.P.; Jue-Rajasingh, D.; Romero, G.; Stenson, J. Operational strategies for distributing durable goods in the base of the pyramid. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2022, 24, 1887–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alsaedi, B.S.; Alamri, O.A.; Jayaswal, M.K.; Mittal, M. A sustainable green supply chain model with carbon emissions for defective items under learning in a fuzzy environment. Mathematics 2023, 11, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, L.; Nan, G.; Li, M.; Feng, B.; Liu, Q. Manufacturer’s online selling strategies under spillovers from online to offline sales. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2023, 74, 157–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Song, L.; Xin, Q.; Chen, H.; Liao, L.; Chen, Z. Optimal decision-making of retailer-Led dual-channel green supply chain with fairness concerns under government subsidies. Mathematics 2023, 11, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xu, H.; Gao, K.; Chi, Y.; Chen, Y.; Peng, R. Interactive impacts of overconfidence and competitive preference on closed-loop supply chain performance. Mathematics 2022, 10, 4334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ho, W.; Zheng, T.; Yildiz, H.; Talluri, S. Supply chain risk management: A literature review. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2015, 53, 5031–5069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Behzadi, G.; O’Sullivan, M.J.; Olsen, T.L.; Zhang, A. Agribusiness supply chain risk management: A review of quantitative decision models. Omega 2018, 79, 21–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wei, X.; Rao, C.; Xiao, X.; Chen, L.; Goh, M. Risk assessment of cardiovascular disease based on SOLSSA-CatBoost model. Expert Syst. Appl. 2023, 219, 119648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ivanov, D.; Dolgui, A.; Sokolov, B.; Ivanova, M. Literature review on disruption recovery in the supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2017, 55, 6158–6174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, H.; Yang, B.; Li, Z.; Pan, C. Transnational corporation’ localization procurement strategies under tax policies and uncertain operation risks: Delegation or control. J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comp. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, L.; Song, J.S.; Swinney, R. Managing social responsibility in multitier supply chains. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2022, 24, 2843–2862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zarrinpoor, N. A sustainable medical waste management system design in the face of uncertainty and risk during COVID-19. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abouee-Mehrizi, H.; Mirjalili, M.; Sarhangian, V. Data-driven platelet inventory management under uncertainty in the remaining shelf life of units. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2022, 31, 3914–3932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, M.; Mizuno, S. Dynamic pricing and inventory management of a dual-channel supply chain under different power structures. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2022, 303, 273–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Niu, B.; Bao, J.; Cao, B. Retailer’s make-or-buy decision for remanufactured products under in-house yield uncertainty. Omega 2022, 110, 102627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Niu, W.; Shen, H. Investment in process innovation in supply chains with knowledge spillovers under innovation uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2022, 302, 1128–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Saberi, S.; Liu, Z.; Besik, D. Strategic decision for capacity portfolio in supply chain network considering emission permit price and demand uncertainty. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 374, 133797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhao, Y.; Zhou, H.; Leus, R. Recovery from demand disruption: Two-stage financing strategy for a capital-constrained supply chain under uncertainty. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2022, 303, 699–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mardani, A.; Kannan, D.; Hooker, R.E.; Ozkul, S.; Alrasheedi, M.; Tirkolaee, E.B. Evaluation of green and sustainable SCM using structural equation modelling: A systematic review of the state of the art literature and recommendations for future research. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 249, 119383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Guo, X.; He, Y. Mathematical modeling and optimization of platform service supply chains: A literature review. Mathematics 2022, 10, 4307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Peng, J.; Zhang, B.; Chen, L.; Li, H. A survey on uncertain graph and uncertain network optimization. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak. 2023, forthcoming. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rao, C.; Huang, Q.; Chen, L.; Goh, M.; Hu, Z. Forecasting the carbon emissions in Hubei Province under the background of carbon neutrality: A novel STIRPAT extended model with ridge regression and scenario analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 57460–57480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rao, C.; Gao, Y. Evaluation mechanism design for the development level of urban-rural integration based on an improved TOPSIS method. Mathematics 2022, 10, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, B. Uncertain set theory and uncertain inference rule with application to uncertain control. J. Uncertain Syst. 2010, 4, 83–98. [Google Scholar]
  33. Liu, B. Why is there a need for uncertainty theory. J. Uncertain Syst. 2012, 6, 3–10. [Google Scholar]
  34. Liu, B. Uncertainty Theory; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhou, J.; Jiang, Y.; Pantelous, A.A.; Dai, W. A systematic review of uncertainty theory with the use of scientometrical method. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dantzig, G.B. Linear programming under uncertainty. Manag. Sci. 1955, 1, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Freund, R.J. The introduction of risk into a programming model. Econometrica 1956, 24, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gorissen, B.L.; Yanıkoğlu, İ.; Hertog, D. A practical guide to RO. Omega 2015, 53, 124–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cheng, L.; Rao, C.; Chen, L. Multidimensional knapsack problem based on uncertain measure. Scientia Iranica Trans. E Ind. Eng. 2017, 24, 2527–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tranfield, D.; Denyer, D.; Smart, P. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br. J. Manag. 2003, 14, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fink, A. Conducting Research Literature Reviews. From the Internet to Paper, 3rd ed.; SAGE: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sauer, P.C.; Seuring, S. Sustainable supply chain management for minerals. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 151, 235–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Auler, D.P.; Teixeira, R.; Nardi, V. Food safety as a field in supply chain management studies: A systematic literature review. Int. Food Agribus. Manag. Rev. 2017, 20, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, Y.; Jin, Q.; Fang, H.; Lei, H.; Hu, J.; Wu, Y.; Wan, Y. Analytic network process: Academic insights and perspectives analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 235, 1276–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, Q.; Waltman, L. Large-scale analysis of the accuracy of the journal classification systems of Web of Science and Scopus. J. Informetr. 2016, 10, 347–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yadav, N.; Luthra, S.; Garg, D. Blockchain technology for sustainable supply chains: A network cluster analysis and future research propositions. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 64779–64799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xu, S.; Zhang, X.; Feng, L.; Yang, W. Disruption risks in supply chain management: A literature review based on bibliometric analysis. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 3508–3526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Saini, N.; Singhania, M.; Yadav, M.P.; Hasan, M.; Abedin, M.Z. Non-financial disclosures and sustainable development: A scientometric analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 381, 135173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Pishvaee, M.S.; Rabbani, M.; Torabi, S.A. A RO approach to closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. Appl. Math. Model. 2011, 35, 637–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lalmazloumian, M.; Wong, K.Y.; Govindan, K.; Kannan, D. A RO model for agile and build-to-order supply chain planning under uncertainties. Ann. Oper. Res. 2016, 240, 435–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shabani, N.; Sowlati, T. A hybrid multi-stage SO-RO model for maximizing the supply chain of a forest-based biomass power plant considering uncertainties. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 3285–3293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zokaee, S.; Jabbarzadeh, A.; Fahimnia, B.; Sadjadi, S.J. Robust supply chain network design: An optimization model with real world application. Ann. Oper. Res. 2017, 257, 15–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Klibi, W.; Martel, A.; Guitouni, A. The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks: A critical review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2010, 203, 283–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gao, Y.; Feng, Z.; Zhang, S. Managing supply chain resilience in the era of VUCA. Front. Eng. Manag. 2021, 8, 465–470. [Google Scholar]
  55. Saghaei, M.; Ghaderi, H.; Soleimani, H. Design and optimization of biomass electricity supply chain with uncertainty in material quality, availability and market demand. Energy 2020, 197, 117165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Razavi, N.; Gholizadeh, H.; Nayeri, S.; Ashrafi, T.A. A RO model of the field hospitals in the sustainable blood supply chain in crisis logistics. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2021, 72, 2804–2828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Foroozesh, N.; Karimi, B.; Mousavi, S.M. Green-resilient supply chain network design for perishable products considering route risk and horizontal collaboration under robust interval-valued type-2 fuzzy uncertainty: A case study in food industry. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 307, 114470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Liu, Z.; Xu, G.; Zhou, C.; Chen, H. Retailer’s decision selection with dual supply uncertainties under different reliability levels of serving the market. RAIRO-Oper. Res. 2020, 54, 883–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liu, Z.; Zhou, C.; Wang, G. Optimal order strategy for channels under different supply risk levels. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2021, 40, 4811–4833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Liu, Z.; Zhao, R.; Liu, X.; Chen, L. Contract designing for a supply chain with uncertain information based on confidence level. Appl. Soft Comput. 2017, 56, 617–631. [Google Scholar]
  61. Liu, Z.; Zhou, C.; Chen, H.; Zhao, R. Impact of cost uncertainty on supply chain competition under different confidence levels. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 2021, 28, 1465–1504. [Google Scholar]
  62. Chen, H.; Yan, Y.; Ma, N.; Yang, L. Coopetition strategy and pricing timing in an outsourcing supply chain with uncertain operation risks. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 2018, 27, 979–993. [Google Scholar]
  63. Chen, H.; Yan, Y.; Liu, Z.; Xing, T. Effect of risk attitude on outsourcing leadership preferences with demand uncertainty. Soft Comput. 2018, 22, 5263–5278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Liu, Z.; Gao, R.; Zhou, C.; Ma, N. Two-period pricing and strategy choice for a supply chain with dual uncertain information under different profit risk levels. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2019, 136, 173–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Farham-Nia, S.; Ghaffari-Hadigheh, A. Optimal pricing strategy in uncertain dual distribution channel with retail services. J. Model. Manag. 2021, 16, 1746–5664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Liu, Z.; Zhou, C.; Liu, J.; Zhou, X. Revelation for green product operation strategy of a retailer under different reliability levels of servicing the market. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, 160, 107594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Chen, L.; Peng, J.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, R. Pricing and effort decisions for a supply chain with uncertain information. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2017, 55, 264–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chen, H.; Wang, X.; Liu, Z.; Zhao, R. Impact of risk levels on optimal selling to heterogeneous retailers under dual uncertainties. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2017, 8, 727–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Huang, H.; Ke, H. Pricing decision problem for substitutable products based on uncertainty theory. J. Intell. Manuf. 2017, 28, 503–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ke, H.; Wu, Y.; Huang, H. Competitive pricing and remanufacturing problem in an uncertain closed-loop supply chain with risk-sensitive retailers. Asia-Pac. J. Oper. Res. 2018, 35, 1850003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chen, H.; Yan, Y.; Ma, N.; Liu, J. Effects of risk attitudes and investment spillover on supplier encroachment. Soft Comput. 2020, 24, 2395–2416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chen, H.; Hao, Y.; Yan, Y. The introduction strategy of the emerging online marketplace considering risk attitude and channel power. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 2020, 49, 470–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ke, H.; Huang, H.; Gao, X. Pricing decision problem in dual-channel supply chain based on experts’ belief degrees. Soft Comput. 2018, 22, 5683–5698. [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhao, S.; Zhang, J.; Cheng, T.C.E. Coordinating supply chains with uncertain production cost by incomplete contracts. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2022, 60, 1386–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ma, W.; Cheng, R.; Ke, H.; Zhao, Z. Optimal pricing decision for supply chains with risk sensitivity and human estimation. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 2019, 10, 1717–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Al-Odeh, M.; Smallwood, J. Sustainable SCM: Literature review, trends, and framework. Int. J. Comput. Eng. Manag. 2012, 15, 85–90. [Google Scholar]
  77. Gao, R.; Zhang, Z. Analysis of green supply chain considering green degree and sales effort with uncertain demand. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2020, 38, 4247–4264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ma, N.; Gao, R.; Wang, X.; Li, P. Green supply chain analysis under cost sharing contract with uncertain information based on confidence level. Soft Comput. 2020, 24, 2617–2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Shen, J. Uncertain two-echelon green supply chain models based on revenue sharing contract. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 2021, 12, 2059–2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Gao, R.; Zhao, Z. Green supply chain analysis considering extended warranty with uncertain factors based on confidence level. J. Ambient. Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Eskandari-Khanghahi, M.; Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R.; Taleizadeh, A.A.; Amin, S.H. Designing and optimizing a sustainable supply chain network for a blood platelet bank under uncertainty. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2018, 71, 236–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Krishnan, R.; Arshinder, K.; Agarwal, R. RO of sustainable food supply chain network considering food waste valorization and supply uncertainty. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2022, 171, 108499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Belhadi, A.; Kamble, S.S.; Mani, V.; Venkatesh, V.G.; Shi, Y. Behavioral mechanisms influencing sustainable supply chain governance decision-making from a dyadic buyer-supplier perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2021, 236, 108136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ahmed, W.; Sarkar, B. Impact of carbon emissions in a sustainable SCM for a second generation biofuel. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 186, 807–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhang, P.; Liu, Y.; Yang, G.; Zhang, G. A multi-objective distributionally robust model for sustainable last mile relief network design problem. Ann. Oper. Res. 2022, 309, 689–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zahiri, B.; Zhuang, J.; Mohammadi, M. Toward an integrated sustainable-resilient supply chain: A pharmaceutical case study. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2017, 103, 109–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Pei, H.; Liu, Y.; Li, H. Robust pricing for a dual-channel green supply chain under fuzzy demand ambiguity. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 2022, 31, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Fazli-Khalaf, M.; Naderi, B.; Mohammadi, M.; Pishvaee, M.S. The design of a resilient and sustainable maximal covering closed-loop supply chain network under hybrid uncertainties: A case study in tire industry. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 23, 9949–9973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Shen, J. An uncertain sustainable supply chain network. Appl. Math. Comput. 2020, 378, 125213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Jabbarzadeh, A.; Haughton, M.; Pourmehdi, F. A RO model for efficient and green supply chain planning with postponement strategy. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019, 214, 266–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kazancoglu, I.; Ozbiltekin-Pala, M.; Mangla, S.K.; Kazancoglu, Y.; Jabeen, F. Role of flexibility, agility and responsiveness for sustainable supply chain resilience during COVID-19. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 362, 132431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Govindan, K.; Fattahi, M.; Keyvanshokooh, E. Supply chain network design under uncertainty: A comprehensive review and future research directions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2017, 263, 108–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Tan, Y.; Ji, X.; Yan, S. New models of supply chain network design by different decision criteria under hybrid uncertainties. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2019, 10, 2843–2853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Tirkolaee, E.B.; Golpîra, H.; Javanmardan, A.; Maihami, R. A socio-economic optimization model for blood supply chain network design during the COVID-19 pandemic: An interactive possibilistic programming approach for a real case study. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 2023, 85, 101439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Dehghani, E.; Jabalameli, M.S.; Jabbarzadeh, A. Robust design and optimization of solar photovoltaic supply chain in an uncertain environment. Energy 2018, 142, 139–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Yan, S.; Ji, X. Supply chain network design under the risk of uncertain disruptions. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 1724–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Peng, J.; Chen, L.; Zhang, B. Transportation planning for sustainable supply chain network using big data technology. Inf. Sci. 2022, 609, 781–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Diabat, A.; Jabbarzadeh, A.; Khosrojerdi, A. A perishable product supply chain network design problem with reliability and disruption considerations. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019, 212, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Yang, G.; Liu, Y.; Yang, K. Multi-objective biogeography-based optimization for supply chain network design under uncertainty. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2015, 85, 144–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ghahremani-Nahr, J.; Kian, R.; Sabet, E. A robust fuzzy mathematical programming model for the closed-loop supply chain network design and a whale optimization solution algorithm. Expert Syst. Appl. 2019, 116, 444–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Tavana, M.; Kian, H.; Nasr, A.K.; Govindan, K.; Mina, H. A comprehensive framework for sustainable closed-loop supply chain network design. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 332, 129777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Hosseini-Motlagh, S.M.; Samani, M.R.G.; Shahbazbegian, V. Innovative strategy to design a mixed resilient-sustainable electricity supply chain network under uncertainty. Appl. Energy 2020, 280, 115921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Salehi, S.; Mehrjerdi, Y.Z.; Sadegheih, A.; Hosseini-Nasab, H. Designing a resilient and sustainable biomass supply chain network through the optimization approach under uncertainty and the disruption. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 359, 131741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Yang, G.; Liu, Y. Designing fuzzy supply chain network problem by mean-risk optimization method. J. Intell. Manuf. 2015, 26, 447–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Dotoli, M.; Epicoco, N.; Falagario, M. A fuzzy technique for supply chain network design with quantity discounts. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2017, 55, 1862–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Farrokh, M.; Azar, A.; Jandaghi, G.; Ahmadi, E. A novel robust fuzzy SO for closed loop supply chain network design under hybrid uncertainty. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2018, 341, 69–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Lim, M.K.; Mak, H.Y.; Shen, Z.J.M. Agility and proximity considerations in supply chain design. Manag. Sci. 2017, 63, 1026–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Cheng, X.; Yang, G.; Fan, L. Global supply chain network design problem with rules of origin and limited import quotas. Kybernetes 2019, 48, 930–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Yang, G.; Liu, Y. Optimizing an equilibrium supply chain network design problem by an improved hybrid biogeography based optimization algorithm. Appl. Soft Comput. 2017, 58, 657–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ghomi-Avili, M.; Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R.; Jalali Naeini, S.G.; Jabbarzadeh, A. Competitive green supply chain network design model considering inventory decisions under uncertainty: A real case of a filter company. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2021, 59, 4248–4267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Hosseini-Motlagh, S.M.; Samani, M.R.G.; Abbasi-Saadi, F. Strategic optimization of wheat supply chain network under uncertainty: A real case study. Oper. Res. 2021, 21, 1487–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Li, H.; Peng, J.; Li, S.; Su, C. Dispatching medical supplies in emergency events via uncertain programming. J. Intell. Manuf. 2017, 28, 549–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Dalal, J.; Üster, H. Combining worst case and average case considerations in an integrated emergency response network design problem. Transp. Sci. 2018, 52, 171–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Rahmani, D. Designing a robust and dynamic network for the emergency blood supply chain with the risk of disruptions. Ann. Oper. Res. 2019, 283, 613–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Zhang, B.; Peng, J.; Li, S. Covering location problem of emergency service facilities in an uncertain environment. Appl. Math. Model. 2017, 51, 429–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Zhang, B.; Li, H.; Li, S.; Peng, J. Sustainable multi-depot emergency facilities location-routing problem with uncertain information. Appl. Math. Comput. 2018, 333, 506–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Boutilier, J.J.; Chan, T.C. Ambulance emergency response optimization in developing countries. Oper. Res. 2020, 68, 1315–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Zhang, L.; Lu, J.; Yang, Z. Dynamic optimization of emergency resource scheduling in a large-scale maritime oil spill accident. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, 152, 107028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Wang, Y.; Sun, B. Multiperiod optimal emergency material allocation considering road network damage and risk under uncertain conditions. Oper. Res. 2022, 22, 2173–2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Yu, G. Emergency relief network design under ambiguous demands: A distributionally RO approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 2022, 208, 118139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zhu, J.; Shi, Y.; Venkatesh, V.G.; Islam, S.; Hou, Z.; Arisian, S. Dynamic collaborative optimization for disaster relief supply chains under information ambiguity. Ann. Oper. Res. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Fazli-Khalaf, M.; Khalilpourazari, S.; Mohammadi, M. Mixed robust possibilistic flexible chance constraint optimization model for emergency blood supply chain network design. Ann. Oper. Res. 2019, 283, 1079–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Vaezi, A.; Dalal, J.; Verma, M. Designing emergency response network for rail hazmat shipments under uncertainties: Optimization model and case study. Saf. Sci. 2021, 141, 105332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Liu, K.; Li, Q.; Zhang, Z.H. Distributionally RO of an emergency medical service station location and sizing problem with joint chance constraints. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 2019, 119, 79–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Song, J.M.; Chen, W.; Lei, L. Supply chain flexibility and operations optimisation under demand uncertainty: A case in disaster relief. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 3699–3713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Ke, G. Managing reliable emergency logistics for hazardous materials: A two-stage RO approach. Comput. Oper. Res. 2022, 138, 105557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Altiparmak, F.; Gen, M.; Lin, L.; Paksoy, T. A genetic algorithm approach for multi-objective optimization of supply chain networks. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2006, 51, 196–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Govindan, K.; Gholizadeh, H. Robust network design for sustainable-resilient RL network using big data: A case study of end-of-life vehicles. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2021, 149, 102279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Yang, L.; Liu, P.; Li, S.; Gao, Y.; Ralescu, D.A. Reduction methods of type-2 uncertain variables and their applications to solid transportation problem. Inf. Sci. 2015, 291, 204–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zhang, B.; Peng, J.; Li, S.; Chen, L. Fixed charge solid transportation problem in uncertain environment and its algorithm. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2016, 102, 186–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Chen, L.; Peng, J.; Zhang, B. Uncertain goal programming models for bicriteria solid transportation problem. Appl. Soft Comput. 2017, 51, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Shen, J.; Zhu, K. An uncertain two-echelon fixed charge transportation problem. Soft Comput. 2020, 24, 3529–3541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Sun, H.; Li, J.; Wang, T.; Xue, Y. A novel scenario-based robust bi-objective optimization model for humanitarian logistics network under risk of disruptions. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2022, 157, 102578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Hashemi, S.E. A fuzzy multi-objective optimization model for a sustainable RL network design of municipal waste-collecting considering the reduction of emissions. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 318, 128577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Gong, H.; Zhang, Z.H. Benders decomposition for the distributionally RO of pricing and RL network design in remanufacturing systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2022, 297, 496–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Du, J.; Yu, L.; Li, X. Fuzzy multi-objective chance-constrained programming model for hazardous materials transportation. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 2016, 44, 286–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Gupta, S.; Haq, A.; Ali, I.; Sarkar, B. Significance of multi-objective optimization in logistics problem for multi-product supply chain network under the intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Complex Intell. Syst. 2021, 7, 2119–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Yang, C.; Chen, J. Robust design for a multi-echelon regional construction and demolition waste RL network based on decision Maker’s conservative attitude. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 273, 121909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Shahparvari, S.; Soleimani, H.; Govindan, K.; Bodaghi, B.; Fard, M.; Jafari, H. Closing the loop: Redesigning sustainable RL network in uncertain supply chains. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, 157, 107093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Xu, X.F.; Hao, J.; Deng, Y.R.; Wang, Y. Design optimization of resource combination for collaborative logistics network under uncertainty. Appl. Soft Comput. 2017, 56, 684–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Jiang, J.; Zhang, D.; Meng, Q.; Liu, Y. Regional multimodal logistics network design considering demand uncertainty and CO2 emission reduction target: A system-optimization approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 248, 119304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Gao, Y.; Yang, L.; Li, S. Uncertain models on railway transportation planning problem. Appl. Math. Model. 2016, 40, 4921–4934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Kumar, N.R.; Kumar, R.S. Closed loop SCM and RL—A literature review. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 2013, 6, 445–468. [Google Scholar]
  144. Goltsos, T.E.; Ponte, B.; Wang, S.; Liu, Y.; Naim, M.M.; Syntetos, A.A. The boomerang returns? Accounting for the impact of uncertainties on the dynamics of remanufacturing systems. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 7361–7394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Peng, H.; Shen, N.; Liao, H.; Xue, H.; Wang, Q. Uncertainty factors, methods, and solutions of closed-loop supply chain—A review for current situation and future prospects. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 254, 120032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Kim, J.; Do Chung, B.; Kang, Y.; Jeong, B. RO model for closed-loop supply chain planning under RL flow and demand uncertainty. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 196, 1314–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Abdolazimi, O.; Bahrami, F.; Shishebori, D.; Ardakani, M.A. A multi-objective closed-loop supply chain network design problem under parameter uncertainty: Comparison of exact methods. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2022, 24, 10768–10802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Yan, G.; Ni, Y.; Yang, X. Pricing and recovery in a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain under uncertain environment. Soft Comput. 2021, 25, 13679–13694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Yan, G.; Song, Q.; Ni, Y.; Yang, X. Pricing, carbon emission reduction and recycling decisions in a closed-loop supply chain under uncertain environment. J. Ind. Manag. Optim. 2022, 19, 224–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Marcos, J.T.; Scheller, C.; Godina, R.; Spengler, T.S.; Carvalho, H. Sources of uncertainty in the closed-loop supply chain of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles. Clean. Logist. Supply Chain 2021, 1, 100006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Kisomi, M.S.; Solimanpur, M.; Doniavi, A. An integrated supply chain model and procurement management under uncertainty: A set-based RO methodology. Appl. Math. Model. 2016, 40, 7928–7947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R.; Sadri, S.; Pourmohammad-Zia, N.; Mohammadi, M. A hybrid fuzzy approach for the closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2015, 28, 2811–2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Gholamian, N.; Mahdavi, I.; Mahdavi-Amiri, N.; Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. Hybridization of an interactive fuzzy methodology with a lexicographic min-max approach for optimizing a multi-period multi-product multi-echelon sustainable closed-loop supply chain network. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, 158, 107282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Amin, S.H.; Baki, F. A facility location model for global closed-loop supply chain network design. Appl. Math. Model. 2017, 41, 316–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Ghomi-Avili, M.; Khosrojerdi, A.; Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. A multi-objective model for the closed-loop supply chain network design with a price-dependent demand, shortage and disruption. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2019, 36, 5261–5272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Gholizadeh, H.; Tajdin, A.; Javadian, N. A closed-loop supply chain RO for disposable appliances. Neural Comput. Appl. 2020, 32, 3967–3985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Krug, Z.; Guillaume, R.; Battaïa, O. Exploring the opportunities in establishing a closed-loop supply chain under uncertainty. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2021, 59, 1606–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Ghasemzadeh, Z.; Sadeghieh, A.; Shishebori, D. A stochastic multi-objective closed-loop global supply chain concerning waste management: A case study of the tire industry. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 23, 5794–5821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Xu, Z.; Pokharel, S.; Elomri, A. An eco-friendly closed-loop supply chain facing demand and carbon price uncertainty. Ann. Oper. Res. 2022, 320, 1041–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Dutta, P.; Das, D.; Schultmann, F.; Fröhling, M. Design and planning of a closed-loop supply chain with three way recovery and buy-back offer. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 135, 604–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Liao, H.; Zhang, Q.; Shen, N.; Nie, Y.; Li, L. Coordination between forward and reverse production streams for maximum profitability. Omega 2021, 104, 102444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Gaur, J.; Amini, M.; Rao, A.K. The impact of supply chain disruption on the closed-loop supply chain profit: A study of sourcing policies. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 5380–5400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. El Baz, J.; Ruel, S. Can supply chain risk management practices mitigate the disruption impacts on supply chains’ resilience and robustness? Evidence from an empirical survey in a COVID-19 outbreak era. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2021, 233, 107972. [Google Scholar]
  164. Gupta, V.; Ivanov, D.; Choi, T.M. Competitive pricing of substitute products under supply disruption. Omega 2021, 101, 102279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Dohale, V.; Ambilkar, P.; Gunasekaran, A.; Bilolikar, V. Examining the barriers to operationalization of humanitarian supply chains: Lessons learned from COVID-19 crisis. Ann. Oper. Res. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Dohmen, A.E.; Merrick, J.R.; Saunders, L.W.; Stank, T.P.; Goldsby, T.J. When preemptive risk mitigation is insufficient: The effectiveness of continuity and resilience techniques during COVID-19. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2023, 32, 1529–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Ghadir, A.H.; Vandchali, H.R.; Fallah, M.; Tirkolaee, E.B. Evaluating the impacts of COVID-19 outbreak on supply chain risks by modified failure mode and effects analysis: A case study in an automotive company. Ann. Oper. Res. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Ramani, V.; Ghosh, D.; Sodhi, M.S. Understanding systemic disruption from the Covid-19-induced semiconductor shortage for the auto industry. Omega 2022, 113, 102720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Kähkönen, A.K.; Evangelista, P.; Hallikas, J.; Immonen, M.; Lintukangas, K. COVID-19 as a trigger for dynamic capability development and supply chain resilience improvement. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2023, 61, 2696–2715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Rahman, T.; Taghikhah, F.; Paul, S.K.; Shukla, N.; Agarwal, R. An agent-based model for supply chain recovery in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, 158, 107401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Singh, S.; Kumar, R.; Panchal, R.; Tiwari, M.K. Impact of COVID-19 on logistics systems and disruptions in food supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2021, 59, 1993–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Rozhkov, M.; Ivanov, D.; Blackhurst, J.; Nair, A. Adapting supply chain operations in anticipation of and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Omega 2022, 110, 102635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Khan, J.; Ishizaka, A.; Mangla, S.K. Assessing risk of supply chain disruption due to COVID-19 with fuzzy VIKORSort. Ann. Oper. Res. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Timonina-Farkas, A.; Glogg, R.Y.; Seifert, R.W. Limiting the impact of supply chain disruptions in the face of distributional uncertainty in demand. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2022, 31, 3788–3805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Sundarakani, B.; Pereira, V.; Ishizaka, A. Robust facility location decisions for resilient sustainable supply chain performance in the face of disruptions. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2021, 32, 357–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Liu, M.; Liu, Z.; Chu, F.; Dolgui, A.; Chu, C.; Zheng, F. An optimization approach for multi-echelon supply chain viability with disruption risk minimization. Omega 2022, 112, 102683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Chen, J.; Wang, H.; Zhong, R.Y. A supply chain disruption recovery strategy considering product change under COVID-19. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 60, 920–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Mohammed, A.; Naghshineh, B.; Spiegler, V.; Carvalho, H. Conceptualising a supply and demand resilience methodology: A hybrid DEMATEL-TOPSIS-possibilistic multi-objective optimization approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, 160, 107589. [Google Scholar]
  179. Sawik, T. Stochastic optimization of supply chain resilience under ripple effect: A COVID-19 pandemic related study. Omega 2022, 109, 102596. [Google Scholar]
  180. Vali-Siar, M.M.; Roghanian, E. Sustainable, resilient and responsive mixed supply chain network design under hybrid uncertainty with considering COVID-19 pandemic disruption. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2022, 30, 278–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Framework diagram of the paper.
Figure 1. Framework diagram of the paper.
Mathematics 11 02530 g001
Figure 2. Study flowchart for the identification, screening, and inclusion of articles.
Figure 2. Study flowchart for the identification, screening, and inclusion of articles.
Mathematics 11 02530 g002
Figure 3. Keyword co-citation networks.
Figure 3. Keyword co-citation networks.
Mathematics 11 02530 g003
Figure 4. Author co-citation networks.
Figure 4. Author co-citation networks.
Mathematics 11 02530 g004
Figure 5. Distribution of articles by year of publication.
Figure 5. Distribution of articles by year of publication.
Mathematics 11 02530 g005
Figure 6. Country co-citation networks.
Figure 6. Country co-citation networks.
Mathematics 11 02530 g006
Table 1. Distribution of papers based on application areas.
Table 1. Distribution of papers based on application areas.
Application AreasNumber of PaperPercentage (%)
General SCM1915.57
SSCM1512.30
SCND2016.39
Emergency network optimization1512.30
Logistics network optimization1512.30
CLSCM2016.39
SCN disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic1814.75
Total121100
Table 2. Distribute of papers based on the name of journals.
Table 2. Distribute of papers based on the name of journals.
Name of JournalFrequency of PublicationPercentage
(%)
Computers & Industrial Engineering119.02
Journal of Cleaner Production119.02
International Journal of Production Research108.19
Annals of Operations Research86.55
Omega75.73
Soft Computing64.91
Applied Mathematical Modeling43.28
Applied Soft Computing43.28
International Journal of Production Economics43.28
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing43.28
Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems43.28
Environment, Development, and Sustainability32.46
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing32.46
Operational Research32.46
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review32.46
European Journal of Operational Research21.64
Expert Systems with Applications21.64
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems21.64
Information Sciences21.64
International Journal of General Systems21.64
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics21.64
Production and Operations Management21.64
Applied Mathematics and Computation21.64
Applied Energy10.82
Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research10.82
Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain10.82
Complex & Intelligent Systems10.82
Computers & Operations Research10.82
Energy10.82
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence10.82
Fuzzy Sets and Systems10.82
International Transactions in Operational Research 10.82
Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization10.82
Journal of Manufacturing Systems10.82
Journal of Modeling in Management 10.82
Kybernetes10.82
Management Science 10.82
Neural Computing and Application10.82
RAIRO-Operation Research10.82
Safety Science10.82
Socio-Economic Planning Sciences10.82
The International Journal of Logistics Management10.82
Transportation Science10.82
Sustainable Production and Consumption10.82
Total121100
Table 3. Distribution of papers based on the nationality of authors.
Table 3. Distribution of papers based on the nationality of authors.
Name of CountryNumber of PublicationsPercentage (%)
China6049.18
Iran2218.03
India97.38
Canada54.09
USA43.28
Australia32.46
Korea32.46
France21.64
Morocco21.64
Turkey21.64
Russia10.82
Denmark10.82
Dubai10.82
Finland10.82
Germany10.82
Iceland10.82
Italy10.82
Oman10.82
Portugal10.82
UK10.82
Total121100
Table 4. Distribution papers based on general SCM.
Table 4. Distribution papers based on general SCM.
Author(s)UncertaintyStudy PurposeModeling/MethodResearch Gap and ContributionResults and Outcomes
Liu et al. [58]SupplyThe retailer’s optimal decision selection problem under uncertaintyProfit maximization model for participants based on benchmark confidence levelThe reliability of uncertain supply is recommended to be characterized by reliability level for service market (RLSM)For different RLSMs, the retailer does not choose a mixed strategy
Liu et al. [59]SupplyThe ordering strategies of integrated and decentralized SCs under different SC constraintsConfidence-based decision rule to assess the uncertain supply of two channelsTo quantify the supply risk caused by channel supply uncertainty, a channel supply risk level is proposedThe ideal ordering method is directly impacted by the differing trust costs for the two channels due to the distinct SC limitations
Liu et al. [60]Variable costContract design issues for two competing heterogeneous suppliers working with a common retailerConfidence-based contract design model for SC with uncertain informationA confidence-based decision rule is applied under incomplete demand informationThe inverse distribution and confidence level of external demand determine the optimal order quantity for the retailer
Liu et al. [61]CostUse uncertainty theory to portray uncertain information under different market structuresCompetitive models for integrated, hybrid and decentralized SCsRepresenting cost and retail price noise as uncertain variableswhen cost uncertainty increases or cost uncertainty in competitive chains decreases, chains should order more products
Chen et al. [62]Operational risk and uncertain demandThe impact of uncertain demand on original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and original design manufacturers (ODMs)Multi-stage model with external demand and product substitution degree as uncertain variablesThe impact of uncertain demand and different risk attitudes on business outsourcing is revealedWhen the OEM is sufficiently risk-averse, the party’s preference for pricing timing remains the same
Chen et al. [63]Degree of substitution and external demandHow risk attitudes affect outsourcing leadership preferences in uncertain demandUsing confidence level from uncertainty theory to portray the risk attitudesFocuses on the effect of risk attitudes of OEMs and their CCMs on leadership/following incentives When both OEMs and CCMs are willing to take the lead, wholesale prices and outsourcing to CCMs are relatively low
Liu et al. [64]Demand and product evaluationA two-stage pricing and strategy selection problem for an SC under uncertaintyProfit risk level is proposed to describe the profit risk under double uncertain informationThe introduction of decision-makers’ risk attitudes into two-stage dynamic pricingThe profits of supply chain participants increase with the level of supply chain profit risk
Farham-Nia and Ghaffari-Hadigheh [65]Environmental UncertaintyThe optimal pricing for SCs with dual distribution channels under centralized and decentralized decision systems Two-stage optimization, the Stackelberg game and the Bertrand-Nash gameCombine uncertainty theory with game theory for the pricing of SC distribution systemsIn both centralized and decentralized SCs where manufacturers predominate, retail services play a vital role
Liu et al. [66]DemandThe implementation of a green strategy by retailers in cooperation with suppliers under uncertaintyA model based on the profit risk level of retailers (PRLR) for different levels of service market reliabilityDecision-makers’ risky attitude is introduced into the green strategy implementation problemFor a specific PRLR, the ideal order quantity for a non-green (green) product is not exactly equal to its market demand
Chen et al. [67]Marketing cost and demandProblem of optimal sales for a provider providing the same good to two rival shopsUncertainty theory and game theory-based modelingThe cost of trust in retailers and the size of trust in the market in the SC are proposedThe higher the risk level, the lower the trust cost for the retailer
Chen et al. [68]Demand and manufacturing and sales effort costPricing and effort decision problems in SCs under uncertain informationGame models are developed based on the expectation criterionConsidering an SC with sales effort and price-dependent demandPricing and effort decisions are significantly impacted by how uncertain sales effort elasticity is
Huang and Ke [69]Manufacturing costs, selling costs, and demandThe pricing decision problem of substitutable products under different power structuresUncertainty theory and game theory-based modeling approachesA study of pricing decision problems based on uncertainty theoryIf the cost of goods sold is higher, consumers can enjoy lower prices in the face of powerful retailers
Ke et al. [70]Recycling costs, remanufacturing costs, and demandThe closed-loop SC pricing issue with two rival risk-averse retailers under uncertaintyThe objective function of a risk-sensitive retailer is described by an opportunity constraint functionHow the degree of parameter uncertainty affects channel members’ pricing and remanufacturing decisionsBoth stores will experience lesser profitability if either of the two retailers becomes more risk-averse
Chen et al. [71]Demand status and production costsSupplier encroachment is examined from SC members’ attitudes toward risk and upstream production investmentConfidence level is used to describe risk attitudeConsider the impact of supplier investment and uncertainties on reducing production costs and supplier encroachmentWhere upstream investment and spillover effects exist, suppliers and retailers can benefit from encroachment strategies at the same time
Chen et al. [72]Cost and demandStudy whether e-retailers and manufacturers can agree on the introduction of a marketplace channelManufacturers’ and e-tailers’ different risk aversions are described by the uncertain sales cost and confidence levelTo completely consider the uncertainty brought on both demand and cost, a new risk management method is presentedManufacturers and e-retailers are less willing to develop online markets as players become more risk-averse.
Ke et al. [73]Demand, costs, and market sizeThe pricing decision problem of a dual-channel SCUncertain two-level planning modelConsider the impact of the power structure and parameters uncertainty The existence of dominance will reduce the profitability of the entire SC
Chen et al. [27]Operational riskAddressing the choice of sourcing strategy for multinational companiesGame model of MNC and OEM under different sourcing structuresConsider the local sourcing strategies of multinational companies under tax policies and uncertain business risksAs MNCs become more risk-averse and non-refundable VAT rates increase, MNCs’ sourcing strategies will move from consignment to control and then back to consignment
Zhao et al. [74]Production costsThe effect of uncertain production costs on optimal decisions and expected profits under the centralized and decentralized decision-makingUncertainty is modeled using the scatter of the mean-holding distributionFor the first time, incomplete contracts are used for coordinationProduction cost uncertainty favors centralized supply chains
Ma et al. [75]MarketChoosing between two risk-sensitive manufacturers whose products are distributed to the same market by a single, dominant retailerOpportunity-constrained planning modelProvides some important management insights on how risk-averse managers of SMEs can manage risk in an uncertain market environmentThe impact of the risk sensitivity depends primarily on estimated demand, and manufacturing costs vary with the risk sensitivity level
Table 5. Distribution papers based on sustainable SCM.
Table 5. Distribution papers based on sustainable SCM.
Author(s)UncertaintyStudy PurposeModeling/MethodResearch Gap and ContributionResults and Outcomes
Gao and Zhang [77]DemandPricing, greenness and sales effort decisions in green SCs under demand uncertaintyExpected value modelProvides some management insights into pricing, greenness and sales effort decisions for an SC under uncertain demandGreenness factor and sales effort factor have a positive effect on pricing, greenness and sales effort
Ma et al. [78]Shipping costs, demand and return ratesThe design of a multi-scenario CLSCN under uncertainty conditions and a robust mean CVaR criterionA new distributed RO model for multi-product, multi-stage CLSCNThe model uses a flexible network allocation strategyThe model can effectively balance the expected cost and CVaR
Shen [79]Market base, demand, price sensitivityThe problem of a two-level green SC network under an uncertain environmentA retailer-led bargaining expectation game model under revenue-sharing contractsConsider joining a revenue-sharing pact to better coordinate the green SC networkRevenue-sharing contracts significantly increase greening and reduce retail prices
Gao and Zhao [80]Product requirementsSolving the green SC pricing problem under uncertainty considering extended warranty servicesConfidence-based decision rulesThe study provides some management perspectives on the greening of the two-stage green SC, extended warranty service levels and pricing issuesThe cost-sharing ratio is positively impacted by the extended warranty service cost rate and the greening investment factor
Eskandari-Khanghahi et al. [81]Environmental uncertaintyImprove the blood supply chain while taking the network’s overall social and environmental impact into accountMulti-period mixed integer SCND modelIntegrate sustainability into the decision-making processThe proposed solution algorithm obtains acceptable solutions in almost all cases
Krishnan et al. [82]Supply uncertaintyStudying Robust Optimization of Sustainable Food Supply Chain Networks with Food Waste Valorization and Supply UncertaintyIntegrated robust multi-objective optimization modelProviding a robust MOMILP model to that simultaneously considers economic, environmental and social sustainability dimensionsThe results of robust optimization models can help decision-makers to make extra efforts to address uncertainty
Belhadi et al. [83]Sustainable performance of supply chain partnersThe behavioral tendencies of supply and demand sides under complexity and uncertaintyA theoretical framework based on three behavioral motivatorsImproved the discussion of sustainable governance by offering a comprehensive understanding of behavioral factorsPositive relationship experiences help increase trust
Ahmed and Sarkar [84]Resource consumption, residual biomass production in agricultural regions and market center demandDevelop a supply chain model to minimize the total cost to meet the uncertain demand at the center of the marketThe model is built by making these parameters uncertain and expressing them as fuzzy numbersThe proposed sustainable distribution of second-generation biofuel supply chains enables decision-makers to minimize the total cost and carbon emissionsModel is feasible for second-generation biofuel supply chain design under uncertainty
Zhang et al. [85]Five types of uncertainty in the last mile networkSolve last-mile relief network design problemsMulti-objective distributed RO modelEstablished the equitable distribution of disaster relief networksThe difficulty of designing the last-mile disaster assistance network incorporates sustainability, resilience, and reliability
Zahiri et al. [86]Environmental uncertaintyA sustainable and resilient pharmaceutical SCN integration design approach for multi-stage planning in an uncertain environmentA new fuzzy possibility-random programming methodA new multi-stage pharmaceutical network design is proposed that includes strategic and tactical decisionsWhere fixed costs exceed variable costs, increasing the number of distribution centers will result in an increase in total costs
Pei et al. [87]Demand with vague uncertaintyThe dual-channel green SC pricing decision problem with market size uncertaintyRobust pricing game modelCombining RO and game theory applied to the pricing decision problem of a dual-channel green SCA direct channel is not always lucrative for manufacturers but always advantageous for retailers when market is uncertain
Fazli-Khalaf et al. [88]Uncertainty of unexpected eventsDesigning a sustainable and resilient CLSCN through real-life case studiesA new hybrid fuzzy possibility flexible programming methodA method to achieve network resilience by extending the effective demand coverage plan is proposedThe objective function assessing greenness is primarily influenced by the network’s decentralization and tire supply chain cost
Shen [89]Costs, environmental impact and social benefitsThe impact of uncertainty on SC sustainability and how to develop optimal SC strategies under uncertaintyMulti-objective opportunity constraint modelOn the basis of binary mapping patterns and variable-length chromosomal coding, an effective mixed integer genetic algorithm is developedDecision-makers should think about using greater resources to cope with uncertainty in the system when confidence levels are high
Jabbarzadeh et al. [90]DemandThe impact of decision-makers’ risk appetite and deferral strategies on the trade-off between economic and environmental goalsBi-objective RO modelIncorporates delay strategies into SC planningDeferral strategies can provide ongoing cost savings to the SC
Kazancoglu et al. [91]Uncertainty due to unexpected eventsFocus on the resilience of sustainable GSCs to avoid disruptions caused by pandemicsPartial least squares (PLS) modelExplain the connections between a few concepts in the context of power transition theory and dynamic capacitiesSC flexibility directly affects agility
Table 6. Distribution papers based on supply chain network design.
Table 6. Distribution papers based on supply chain network design.
Author(s)UncertaintyStudy PurposeModeling/MethodResearch Gap and ContributionResults and Outcomes
Govindan et al. [92]Uncertain environmentA review of research on RL network design and SCM in uncertain environmentsStochastic planning, risk-averse stochastic planning, RO, and fuzzy mathematical planningSCM aspects and optimization techniques in the field of supply chain and reverse logistics (RL) network design under uncertaintySolving reliable and resilient SCN under the risk of disruption will be a promising future research direction
Tan et al. [93]Retailer demand and operating costsA new model for SCND based on different decision criteria under mixed uncertaintyExpectation cost minimization model, β-cost minimization model, opportunity metric maximization modelThree models of the SCND problem under mixed uncertainty environment are developedDifferent decision criteria can result in significantly different SCNDs
Tirkolaee et al. [94]Demand, volume, and blood disposal ratesOptimally configure a multi-echelon blood SC network under uncertaintyBi-objective mixed integer linear programming modelA new fuzzy optimization model was introduced to determine the optimal blood SCND variablesThe approach used can handle both the bi-objective nature of the model and the uncertainty
Dehghani et al. [95]Uncertain environmentDesign and planning photovoltaic cell supply chain (PVSC) under uncertaintyData envelopment analysis (DEA) and a two-stage approach to RO modelsA two-stage optimization method based on DEA and RO model is proposed to integrate the strategic and tactical decisions of PVSCThe mean and standard deviation of the proposed robust model are better when the electricity demand shortfall is within the acceptable range
Yan and Ji [96]Interruption uncertaintyDesigning a three-tier SCN with risk of disruptionUncertain nonlinear mixed integer programming modelProposed a combination of multi-backup and cross-echelon transport strategiesLagrangian relaxation algorithm for solving linearized models and genetic algorithm for solving simplified models are proposed
Peng et al. [97]Information uncertainty in big dataThe study of SCN’s retail optimization and transportation planning under uncertaintyUncertainty optimization models under different carbon control policiesUncertainty theory is used to deal with uncertainty in big data informationCap-and-trade regulations can aid businesses in cutting expenditures overall and carbon emissions
Diabat et al. [98]Interruption uncertaintyStudy the problem of designing a network of perishable SC for reliability and disruptionBi-objective RO modelFills the gap from the SCND perspective on the impact of disruptions on the timely and cost-effective delivery of perishable products during disastersAs base models and communication issues increase, the time to deliver products to customers becomes longer
Yang et al. [99]Shipping costs and customer demandSolving multi-objective SCND problems under uncertaintyTwo-stage optimization approachCombining the approximation method and multi-objective biogeography-based optimization methodThe main benefits of using the proposed multi-objective optimization approach can help companies reduce costs
Ghahremani-Nahr et al. [100]Demand, return rates, transportation costs, raw material prices and shortage Designing facility siting/distribution models under s uncertaintyMixed integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) modelA new WHALE optimization algorithm is proposed for the model built is the NP-hard modelThe algorithm can find the approximate optimal solution in a reasonable computation time
Tavana et al. [101]DemandDesigning sustainable CLSC networksMulti-objective mixed integer linear programming (MOMILP) modelDeveloped an integrated MOMILP model for designing and optimizing sustainable CLSC networksThe proposed model has validity and logical performance
Hosseini-Motlagh et al. [102]Electricity demandStudying uncertainty in the design of resilient and sustainable power SCNMulti-objective RO modelA new fuzzy robustness method is proposedThe proposed multi-objective framework achieves increased resilience and CSR
Salehi et al. [103]Bio-energy demandDesigning a resilient and sustainable bio-energy supply networkMulti-criteria decision-making methodA single-objective model that considers resilience and sustainability indicatorsThe proposed model has important applications in improving the performance of biomass SC
Yang and Liu [104]Shipping costs and customer demandStudy the SCND problem under uncertaintyTwo-stage mean-risk fuzzy optimization methodA new two-stage average risk SCND problem is proposedLarger gains were obtained by solving the two-stage mean-risk SCND problem
Dotoli et al. [105]Uncertain environmentResearch on the SCND method under uncertaintyFuzzy linear integer programming modelAn SCND approach is proposed to maximize the overall efficiency of the SCN under uncertainty, considering possible price discountsThe proposed approach allows for solving the SCND problem of make-to-order production
Farrokh et al. [106]Mixed uncertaintyRO framework for CLSCND using robust method under mixed uncertaintyMixed integer programming modelA new robust fuzzy SO by extending the RO method to a fuzzy scenario-based SO modelThe model is better at reducing the total variability as the optimal robustness measure
Lim et al. [107]DemandDesign a responsive SCN considering the agility of the systemProgrammatic modeling approachA programmatic modeling approach is used to study the optimal network design problem under two inventory-sharing modelsWhen the agility dimensions are jointly optimized, it is optimal to allocate more distribution centers (DCS) and each DCS to handle smaller demand volumes when the cost per unit of shortage penalty increases
Cheng et al. [108]Shipping costs and customer demandDiscuss the influence of international factors on siting decisionsTransformation of the model into a mixed integer programming using the sample approximation methodAn uncertain global SCND model with rules of origin (ROOS) and finite import quota is proposedROOs and limited import quotas can affect the optimal choice of factory and distribution center locations
Yang and Liu [109]Shipping costs and customer demandStudy of equilibrium SCND under uncertaintyThe optimization model introduces combined service level constraints and cost-risk level constraintsA new method is proposed for dealing with plausibility constraints based on dominance sets and valid inequalitiesThe corresponding plausibility-constrained planning of the initial equilibrium SCND model is developed
Ghomi-Avili et al. [110]DemandDesigning a green competitive CLSC network considering demand uncertainty under disruption riskRobust two-layer modelBridging the research gap in the design of competitive CLSCN in mixed uncertainty environmentsPercentage of total loss requirements is reduced by reducing the risk of disruption
Hosseini-Motlagh et al. [111]Supply, demand, costs and climateOptimizing the total cost of wheat SCNDRobust modelThe proposed mathematical model considers the various dimension, seeking to minimize the total cost of the networkRobust models yield better results at all levels of perturbation and reliability
Table 7. Distribution papers based on emergency network optimization.
Table 7. Distribution papers based on emergency network optimization.
Author(s)UncertaintyStudy PurposeModeling/MethodResearch Gap and ContributionResults and Outcomes
Li et al. [112]Demand and runtimeHandling medical supplies dispatch in emergenciesUncertain planning methodsIntroducing uncertainty planning as a new tool for dealing with real-world uncertaintiesThe designed algorithm has good robustness to the parameters set in the genetic algorithm
Dalal and Üster [113]The location and intensity of the disasterA challenge in designing emergency response networks that incorporates the relief (supply) and evacuation (demand) sidesStochastic planning frameworkDecision models with data uncertainty are treated with SO and RO by weighting the relevant cost componentsThe impact of changing parameters on shelter siting decisions depends on the variability between potential demand and scenarios
Rahmani [114]Demand uncertainty and disruption riskStudy of dynamic emergency blood network design issuesRO methodCapture the relationship between disruption and changes in blood demandDiscrete-continuous hybrid approach solved the disruption and uncertainty
Zhang et al. [115]Response time and node requirementsApplication of uncertainty theory to study the siting of emergency service facilities under uncertaintyUncertain site-set coverage model, ( α , β )-maximum coverage siting model, and α-opportunity maximum coverage siting modelModels further improve the ability to model and solve emergency services facility siting problems under uncertaintyThe relationship between the ( α , β )-maximum coverage siting model and the α-opportunity maximum coverage siting model is given
Zhang et al. [116]Trip times, emergency response costs and CO2Sustainable multi-warehouse emergency facility siting-routing problems with uncertain informationMulti-objective emergency response site-selection path planning modelA hybrid intelligent algorithm is designed considering real-time, economy and CO2 emissionSolved the problem of siting paths for sustainable multi-bank emergency facilities with uncertain information
Boutilier and Chan [117]Travel timeOptimizing the location and routing of emergency response vehiclesRO methodThe model offers a broad foundation for travel time uncertainty based on edgesIn comparison to typical ambulance vehicles, a fleet of miniature ambulances could perform substantially better
Zhang et al. [118]Time-varying demand, and the state of the associated transport networkProvide a new optimization model to provide by balancing response capacity and total response costDynamic multi-objective
triage distribution location path model
Considers the interrelationship between the decision-making environment and emergency responseThe model supports a practical emergency response to large-scale oil spill incidents
Wang and Sun [119]Fuzzy random information, road network destruction and other uncertaintiesDevelopment of a risk metric for multi-cycle material allocation and road rehabilitation under uncertaintyOptimization model for multi-cycle homogeneous procurement under uncertaintyA risk measure for path transportation risk and road network rehabilitation risk during multi-cycle emergency material deployment is designedThe proposed risk measurement method can effectively measure the multi-cycle transportation risk and route rehabilitation risk
Zhang et al. [120]DemandDesign emergency relief networks for responding to disasters under uncertaintyDistributed RO (DRO) modelUncertainty requirements are described by fuzzy sets based on mean, mean absolute deviation and support setsThe out-of-sample performance of the proposed DRO model is better
Zhu et al. [121]Relief informationEvaluation of emergency supplies suppliers to optimize logistics operationsA collaborative optimization modelA dynamic collaborative decision-making model based on interval binary trapezoidal fuzzy set EMR is proposedThe proposed optimization method can optimize the emergency material plan
Fazli-Khalaf et al. [122]Practical applicationsDesigning a blood SCN for emergenciesRobust possibility flexible chance constraint planning (RPFCCP) and possibility flexible chance constraint planning (PFCCP) modelsConsiders laboratories and hospitals in the blood SCN to design the most efficient blood SCThe PFCCP model can handle the uncertainty of the objective function parameters and constraints more effectively
Vaezi et al. [123]Hazardous material eventsIdentify storage locations for response facilities and kitsTwo-stage SO modelFor the first time, the unique characteristics of hazardous railroad materials transportation are incorporated into academic research incidentsDecisions on the design of strategic emergency response networks based primarily on empirical evidence will compromise the network’s efficacy
Liu et al. [124]Uncertainties inherent in medical services (EMS) systemsAssist disaster relief planners with the construction of long-term EMS systemsA distributed robust modelThe study represents the first time that DRO has addressed the location and size of an EMS station The DRM obtains higher reliability in terms of the performance of the solution method
Song et al. [125]DemandThe SC operation of rescue equipment in disaster relief in the context of a practical applicationOptimization model to minimize the total delay in delivering rescue kitsThe impact of different SC flexibility on SC demand satisfaction is examinedIncreased SC flexibility can significantly reduce delays in the delivery of relief tools
Ke et al. [126]Possible disruptions to emergency facilities and road linksThe impact of possible system disruptions on the performance of hazardous materials emergency logistics systemsTwo mixed integer programming models are developed using a two-stage RO approachFirst attempt to incorporate multi-facility, multi-link random interruptions into system developmentDetermine emergency response facilities’ locations and their capacities for a variety of scenarios quickly
Table 8. Distribution papers based on logistics network optimization.
Table 8. Distribution papers based on logistics network optimization.
Author(s)UncertaintyStudy PurposeModeling/MethodResearch Gap and ContributionResults and Outcomes
Govindan and Gholizadeh [128]Location uncertainTo study the physical and uncertain locations where information between RL facilities has big data characteristicsRobust model optimizationRecycling technology options and reuse concepts for end-of-life vehicle RL and their corresponding social impactsOrganizational cost savings can be achieved by optimally planning the center’s capabilities
Yang et al. [129]Multiple UncertaintiesStudy of type II uncertain variable approximation method and their application to the solid transport problemApproximate expectation value model with opportunity constraintGive a definition of type II uncertainty variables by introducing a generalized uncertainty measureThe suggested method converts the mathematical model into a reduced expectation value model with chance limitations
Zhang et al. [130]Supply, demand, transportation capacity, direct and fixed costsStudy the problem of transporting fixed-charge solids under uncertain conditionsExpected value, time-constrained planning, and metric opportunity planning modelsA hybrid intelligent algorithm for solving near-optimal solutions is proposedUncertainty theory is an effective method for dealing with uncertain parameters
Chen et al. [131]Supply, demand, transportation capacity, transportation costs and transportation timeStudy of an uncertain class of two-particle solid transport problemsExpectation value objective planning model and opportunity-constrained objective planning modelThe total transportation cost and total transportation time are consideredThe expected value and opportunity-constrained models can be transformed into corresponding deterministic equivalence models, respectively
Shen and Zhu [132]Demand, supply, availability, fixed costs, and transport volumesA class of two-level fixed charge transport problems under uncertainty to maximize total profitExpected value, opportunity constraint, and measured opportunity modelsConsidering more realistic and important factorsThe suggested technique is effective in finding a close-to-ideal solution
Sun et al. [133]The risk of disruptionOptimize the humanitarian logistics networkRobust scenario-based bi-objective optimization modelThe possibility of medical facilities being disrupted in crisis scenarios is consideredMore casualties can be accommodated in open temporary hospitals and medical facilities
Hashemi [134]Uncertain environmentIntegrated design of multi-objective models for RL networks using fuzzy mathematical planningMixed integer linear programming modelSimultaneously use two meta-heuristics and compare the resultsThe swarm algorithm is better able to explore and extract feasible solutions for the region and obtain near-optimal answers
Gong and Zhang [135]The quality of earningsA pricing and RL network design problem with return quality uncertaintyDistributionally robust risk aversion modelThe first use of price-dependent fuzzy degree sets to describe quality uncertaintyThe robust distribution model can effectively hedge against high uncertainties
Du et al. [136]Fuzzy environmentStudy of hazardous materials transportation to minimize risk to life, travel time and fuel consumptionFuzzy multi-objective planning modelA fuzzy multi-objective planning model for the transportation of hazardous chemicalsThe model is valid, and the hybrid intelligence algorithm is stable and convergent for large-scale problems
Gupta et al. [137]Intuitive blurred environmentObtain the best distribution order for products Fuzzy goal planning (FGP) methodThe company to follow a structured approach to shipping and distributing orders from multiple sources to destinationsThe results obtained give the optimal quantities to be transported from different sources to different destinations
Yang and Chen [138]SupplyArguing that the robustness of RL network can be improved and modeled for decision-making by acquiring facility capacityRO methodA new RO model is proposedThe model can adjust the robustness of the RL network
Shahparvari et al. [139]Uncertain SCRedesigning sustainable RL network in uncertain SCRobust stochastic optimization modelA sustainable RL optimization model is developed for minimizing carbon emissionsDetermine the optimal flow of products by using chance constrained robust
Xu et al. [140]Discrete uncertaintyInvestigation of a novel approach to solve CLNDOP resource combination problems with discrete uncertainty (DU-CLNDOP)Expectation value model with robust constraintsA generic two-stage decision framework is proposed to solve DU-CLNDOPAllows decision-makers to select the best CLN design option in uncertain situations
Jiang et al. [141]DemandDesign of regional multimodal logistics networks with CO2 reduction targets and uncertain demandTunable RO methodA new two-layer planning model is developedThe proposed method is an effective way to solve the problem of designing regional multimodal logistics networks with uncertain demand
Gao et al. [142]Fixed charges and transportation costsThe design of a frequency service network in a rail freight system with uncertain fixed and transport costsBudget constraint model and possibility constraint modelUncertain variables are introduced in the rail freight model to describe transportation costs and fixed chargesAn algorithm for calculating the distribution function is proposed
Table 9. Distribution papers based on closed-loop SCM.
Table 9. Distribution papers based on closed-loop SCM.
Author(s)UncertaintyStudy PurposeModeling/MethodResearch Gap and ContributionResults and Outcomes
Goltsos et al. [144]Demand, and control uncertaintyA systematic review of developments in the field of CLSCs in the literatureForecasting, collection, inventory and production control provide ways to reduce uncertaintyConsidering the practical challenges faced by SC managers, and suggesting avenues for future researchPresent a structured review of the current state of knowledge in the CLSC field
Peng et al. [145]UncertaintiesTo study the characteristics of CLSC with previously inherent uncertaintiesIntegrating uncertainty factors, methods and solutions into one analytical frameworkAnalyze the root causes of different uncertainties and their impact on productionUncertainty factors in RL/CLSC are identified
Kim et al. [146]RL and demandDevelop a CLSC planning modelMixed integer optimization model and robust correspondence modelThe offsetting effect of different uncertainties is foundCollectors with low uncertainty have a positive impact on profits
Abdolazimi et al. [147]Demand, returns and on-time deliveryProvide a model for developing and improving forward SC and improving overall SC performance under uncertaintyMixed integer linear programming modelConsidering uncertainty, supplier selection and the quality of the final product delivered to the customerSupply chain modeling in terms of uncertainty and product quality to select the best supplier
Yan et al. [148]The cost of manufacturing sales, retailer sales costs, etcStudy pricing and recycling strategies in a CLSC consisting of manufacturers, retailers, and third-party recycling centersDecentralized pricing modelA pricing and recycling decision model for CLSC with different recycling channels in an uncertain environmentThe recovery rates of all models remain constant
Yan et al. [149]Costs, demand, manufacturers’ total carbon emissions, and the amount of recycled productResearch in CLSC pricing and recovery decision problemsDecentralized game modelUsing game theory, three decentralized pricing models based on uncertainty theory are discussedWhen the variance of the retailer’s cost of goods sold increases, the retailer can charge a higher markup price
Marcos et al. [150]Supply, demand, control uncertainty, and environmental uncertaintyIdentification of uncertainty in CLSC management of automotive lithiumion batteriesUncertainties in CLSC in qualitative and quantitative formEnable practitioners to develop a design and management approach for CLSC of lithiumion batteries for electric vehiclesEnvironmental uncertainty, in addition to closed-loop control and supply system uncertainty
Kisomi et al. [151]Uncertain environment for SC and supplier selectionResearch on SC integration and procurement management under uncertaintyIntegrated mathematical planning model based on RO theoryCombining supplier selection with quantity discounting and CLSC network designEnough to provide robust and stable solutions to overcome the inherent uncertainty of inexact parameters, thus saving significant costs
Tavakkoli-Moghaddam et al. [152]Demand, cost factors, transit time and capacity constraintsDesigning bidirectional facility networks in logistics networks under uncertaintyFuzzy possibility planning and fuzzy multi-objective planningInclusion of supplier selection procedures where different levels of quality existMinimizes total costs as well as total defect, waste, and pollution generation rates
Gholamian et al. [153]Some key parameters in the SCSolving a multi-product, multi-cycle, multi-stage, large-scale sustainable CLSC modelFuzzy multi-stage, multi-level, multi-objective mixed integer nonlinear programming (MOMINLP) modelFor the fuzzy MOMINLP problem, a new interactive fuzzy planning method is proposedThe proposed fuzzy method is more effective than other available methods
Amin and Baki [154]DemandMathematical model of CLSC network considering global factors such as exchange rates and tariffsMulti-objective mixed integer linear programming modelThe model considers global factors in the CLSCExchange rates and tariffs play an important role in the global CLSC network
Ghomi-Avili et al. [155]Interruption riskBuild an optimization model to design a CLSCNMulti-objective modelConsider disruption risk and uncertainty and investigate lateral transit strategiesA company can save money by increasing the use of lateral transfer strategies and collecting products returned from customers
Gholizadeh et al. [156]Demand and costsMaximize the value of returned products in the reverse network and manufactured products in the forward networkCombination of genetic algorithm and ROThe proposed genetic algorithm is slightly different from other algorithms in the literatureThe model can effectively solve the problem of one-time appliance CLSCN
Krug et al. [157]Demand, the amount of returned products and the time required to reprocess themHelp managers better assess risks and opportunities while determining SC designTwo-stage multi-cycle mixed integer planningThis paper introduces the R* criterion for the CLSC design problem, which assumes that decision-makers are pessimistic in the danger zone and optimistic in the opportunity zone to distinguish between danger and opportunityThe use of the R* criterion allows for better exploration of the opportunity domain without losing robustness control
Ghasemzadeh et al. [158]Demand and returnsDevelop a mathematical model of the tire SC in order to simultaneously consider the most practical factorsMixed integer linear programming modelDeveloped a CLSCND formula that includes demand uncertainty and product return ratesThe optimal CLSCND can be very different in terms of global factors
Xu et al. [159]Demand and carbon pricesDesigning a CLSC in a multi-cycle planning environment under a carbon trading mechanismTwo-stage stochastic modelThe modeling strategy suggested in this study enables businesses to base their carbon trading decisions on the quantity of carbon creditsStochastic models generate networks with capacity redundancy and can science changes in customer demand and carbon prices
Dutta et al. [160]Demand and capacityPropose a recycling framework using a buy-back strategy at the retailer levelMulti-cycle CLSC optimization modelProvides a proactive mitigation strategy for disruptions caused by manufacturing facility capacity uncertaintyThere is a trade-off between the additional benefits generated by remanufacturing and the cost of acquiring the old product
Liao et al. [161]Acquisition rates and market demandUse collaboration between forward and reverse production streams to balance uncertain sourcing rates and market demandOptimization modelConsider the rate of return and market demand are both stochastic and independent of each otherDespite low processing costs, remanufactured products do not necessarily mean greater cost efficiency
Gaur et al. [162]Risks in the supply chainCompare the impact of single versus multiple sources of new and modified products on SC profitability under potential SCDMINLP modelThe new product demand dynamics are explicitly considered when building the multi-source CLSC modelMultiple sources yield higher total profit compared to a single source
Table 10. Distribution papers based on supply chain network disruption during COVID-19.
Table 10. Distribution papers based on supply chain network disruption during COVID-19.
Author(s)UncertaintyStudy PurposeModeling/MethodResearch Gap and ContributionResults and Outcomes
El Baz and Ruel [163]SC riskAnalyzing how SCRM functions in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak to reduce the effects of disruptions on SC robustness and resilienceStructural equation modelThe findings help identify key processes that companies may deploy to improve the resilience and robustness of their SCExplains how SCRM practices work as mediators and the crucial part they play in fostering SC resilience and robustness
Gupta et al. [164]Supply interruptionThe impact of supply disruptions on the ability to time alternative product pricing decisions for two suppliers in a retailer supply chain settingNash and Stackelberg game modelHelps explain the pricing behavior of firms under supply disruptions and provides recommendations for improving their operationsThe number of orders affecting the supplier depends on the price leader
Dohale et al. [165]Disruptive SC risks caused by natural or man-made activitiesIdentifying key operationalized barriers to the humanitarian supply chain (HSC) in India during the COVID-19 pandemicExplanatory structural model (ISM) by merging neutrosophic methodsFirst research work to identify and analyze key barriers to HSC operation during COVID-19 in IndiaThe most critical barriers during the COVID-19 outbreak are unlike other disruptions
Dohmen et al. [166]SC disruptionObserve and find strategies to better understand disruptionsExperimental design and discrete-event simulationImprove service and inventory performance during COVID-19 disruptionDecision changes have a greater impact on business continuity
Ghadir et al. [167]SC riskExploring the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on SC riskTo assess the discovered SCRs, a better failure mode and impacts analysis is proposedA reliable multi-attribute decision method is proposed for evaluating the weight vector of the current SCR caused by the COVID-19 outbreakDiscussed how the COVID-19 outbreak affects SC risk as well as what the key SCRs are for the COVID-19 pandemic
Ramani et al. [168]SC disruptionExplores how disruptions begin, propagate, and persistLinear programming-based SC planning modelA programmatic analytical model was developed to illustrate how disruptions propagate over timeInteraction of external shocks and reactions of different participants in the SC prolong disruptions in the SC
Kähkönen et al. [169]SC riskAnalyzing the impact of COVID-19 on capacity development and SC resilience improvement in the medical device industryDynamic capability view as a theoretical frameworkProvides empirical evidence and theoretical insights into the impact of large-scale SC disruptions on firms’ dynamic capabilities and their impact on SC resilienceThe impact of COVID-19 on a company’s upstream SC can affect a company’s ability to seize opportunities or eliminate threats
Rahman et al. [170]SC disruptionReview a consistent strategy and recovery plan to minimize costs and maximize the availability of necessary items to respond to global SC disruptionsAgent-based modeling approachDemonstrated how simulation-based methodologies can analyze and predict the impact of pandemic situations on SCs using simulation modeling softwareBy minimizing risk response time and maximizing production capacity, thereby reducing financial shocks to the business
Singh et al. [171]SC disruptionPropose an action plan to address disruptions in the supply due to the pandemicSimulation model of a public distribution system (PDS) networkSimulation models can help create a resilient food SC that adapts to changes in demandThe consolidation of warehouses helps to achieve demand fulfillment from alternate warehouses in the event of an outage at the assigned warehouse
Rozhkov et al. [172]Uncertainty in the COVID-19 pandemicTo study the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the proactive mediationSimulation model based on analytical model of perishable goods inventory controlThe model combines three levels, which are not common in the operations management literatureTwo-stage SC exhibit higher vulnerability in case of disruptions
Khan et al. [173]SC disruptionObserve the resilience of the economic sector and perform ranking using three predefined classesA novel approach to fuzzy VIKORNo studies classify economic sectors based on SC disruptionsRank the economic sectors based on severe, moderate, and low disruptions
Timonina-Farkas et al. [174]Uncertainty in disruptions and demand distributionStudy the impact of limiting SC disruptions under uncertainty in demand allocationTwo-layer stochastic optimization model with chance constraintsAn efficient numerical solution scheme combining a robust scenario reduction method and a customized Benders decomposition process is proposedIn the case of disruptions following a peak in demand, the optimality gap can be closed if the service level is reduced
Sundarakani et al. [175]Cost and fulfillment, trade uncertainty, the risk of environmental trade-offExamine the question of building or shifting distribution centers in the GSC in the face of uncertaintyRO and mixed integer linear programming (ROMILP)For the first time, the sustainability dimension of global logistics corridors is examined and investigated from the perspective of global container transportAlong the planned global logistics corridor, the system offers optimality for all tested market situations
Liu et al. [176]Disruption riskThe investigation of a novel interruption propagation control issue in multi-echelon SC interventions with constrained fundingMixed integer nonlinear programming modelA new multi-level supply chain survival problem with a limited intervention budget is investigatedThe proposed model allows for minimizing the risk of disruption with a limited intervention budget
Chen et al. [177]SC disruptionSC disruption recovery strategy motivated by changing the original product type is proposedMixed integer linear programming modelStudy the special case of supply chain disruptions during a pandemic, and develop a disruption recovery strategyThe proposed disruption recovery strategy effectively reduces manufacturers’ profit losses due to late deliveries and order cancellations
Mohammed et al. [178]SC riskA real-life case study of a manufacturing company motivated by changes in supply and demand to improve its SCRHybrid integrated multi-attribute decision-possibility bi-objective planning model (MADM-PBOPM)First time to combine a flexible supplier selection (RSS) approach with demand variation through the development of MADM-PBOPMThe developed methodology can potentially be used to build SC that are resilient to supply disruptions and demand uncertainty
Sawik [179]Interruption riskSolving ripple optimization problems in SC operationsMulti-combination methods and scenario-based stochastic mixed integer programming modelsDeveloped a scenario-based stochastic mixed-integer programming formulationSuccessfully used to mitigate the effects of multi-regional pandemic disturbances and ripple responses
Vali-Siar and Roghanian [180]SC disruptionResearch on the design of hybrid open and CLSCN with responsiveness, resilience, and sustainabilityRobust-stochastic hybrid optimization methodsThe model can be used as an effective tool for designing SSC and their related decisionsUsing a resilience strategy at the same time delivers the best results for SC objectives
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, L.; Dong, T.; Peng, J.; Ralescu, D. Uncertainty Analysis and Optimization Modeling with Application to Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Review. Mathematics 2023, 11, 2530. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11112530

AMA Style

Chen L, Dong T, Peng J, Ralescu D. Uncertainty Analysis and Optimization Modeling with Application to Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Review. Mathematics. 2023; 11(11):2530. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11112530

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Lin, Ting Dong, Jin Peng, and Dan Ralescu. 2023. "Uncertainty Analysis and Optimization Modeling with Application to Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Review" Mathematics 11, no. 11: 2530. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11112530

APA Style

Chen, L., Dong, T., Peng, J., & Ralescu, D. (2023). Uncertainty Analysis and Optimization Modeling with Application to Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Review. Mathematics, 11(11), 2530. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11112530

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop