1. Introduction
Ladder graphs can be used for image segmentation, where the task is to partition an image into distinct regions based on their characteristics. Graph labeling can be employed to assign labels to the vertices or edges of a ladder graph, representing the image pixels or their relationships. Ladder graphs with labeled edges can model the adjacency of pixels in an image, and the labels can represent attributes such as color, intensity, or texture. Image segmentation using ladder graphs and graph labeling can have applications in computer vision, medical imaging, and image analysis for engineering tasks such as object recognition, image understanding, and pattern recognition. Graph labeling can be applied to represent different characteristics of the sensor nodes or the links between them, such as node locations, sensing capabilities, or communication strengths. Labeled ladder graphs can help in designing efficient routing algorithms, optimizing network performance, and managing sensor networks for various applications, including environmental monitoring, smart grids, and industrial automation. Also, ladder graphs with graph labeling can be employed in VLSI design, where complex digital circuits are implemented on integrated circuits. Graph labeling can represent the characteristics of circuit components, such as gates, flip-flops, or interconnects, and their relationships in the circuit. Labeled ladder graphs can be used for tasks such as circuit optimization, layout generation, and logic synthesis, enabling engineers to design and optimize VLSI circuits for various applications, including microprocessors, digital signal processing, and communication systems. Ladder graphs with graph labeling can be utilized in bioinformatics, which is the application of computational techniques to analyze biological data. Graph labeling can represent biological entities, such as DNA sequences, protein interactions, or metabolic pathways, and their relationships in a biological system. Labeled ladder graphs can be used for tasks such as gene expression analysis, protein–protein interaction prediction, and metabolic pathway reconstruction, helping researchers in understanding biological processes and designing bio-informatics algorithms for biological data analysis. Moreover, it can be employed in social network analysis, which involves studying the relationships between individuals in a social network. Graph labeling can represent the attributes or characteristics of individuals, such as age, gender, occupation, or interests, and the relationships between them, such as friendships, collaborations, or influence. Labeled ladder graphs can be used for tasks such as community detection, sentiment analysis, and information diffusion analysis in social networks, enabling researchers to gain insights into social structures, behaviors, and dynamics.
We adhere to the notations and terminology in [
1,
2]. The ladder graph
is defined with
, where
is a path containing
n nodes and
is a two-vertex complete graph. The slanting ladder
is a graph created by combining the paths
and
with
. The triangular ladder
for
is a graph formed by merging two pathways using
and
by combining the edges
and
We include [
3] for an in-depth investigation of graph labeling. The authors discussed the FRSM for the line graphs of
and
in [
4].
average assignments and
face labelings for generalised prism are described in [
5,
6], respectively. In [
7,
8], Alanazi et al. talked about the classical meanness of the double-sided step graph. The super
-edge-anti magic total characteristics of graphs have been highlighted by Dafik Slamin et al. in [
9]. In [
10], Moussa and Badr demonstrated the odd gracefulness of ladder graphs. The authors of [
11,
12] stressed the importance of the edge even graceful labeling. Deb and Limaye talked about the elegant labelings of triangular snakes in [
13], and Diefenderfer et al. examined the prime vertex labelings of various graph families in [
14]. We highlighted some results in ladder graphs according to the
F-centroidal meanness property, which was inspired by such remarkable investigation into the subject of
F-centroidal mean graph assignments in [
15,
16]. If a function
is an injective vertex assignment in
and inductive edge assignment function
in
is expressed as a graph with
q edges, defined as
then the function is referred to as
F-centroidal mean labeling. This is known as the
F-centroidal mean criterion. With regard to our criteria,
Figure 1 highlights the
F-centroidal mean labeling of cycle
. The node and link assignment sets of
are
and
. After the assignments of
, it obeys the conditions for
F-centroidal mean requirements.
2. Main Results
Based on the definition of the F-centroidal mean requirement, the injective node assignment is and the generated bijective link assignment is ; we will discuss the F-centroidal meanness of the graphs ladder, slanting ladder, triangular ladder, , for , double-sided step ladder, , and diamond ladder.
Theorem 1. The ladder graph permits the F-centroidal mean requirement for .
Proof. Let and be the vertices of the ladder graph .
Then, the following description of
is provided.
After that, the generated line assignment
is accomplished.
As a result, the graph permits the F-centroidal mean requirement. □
Theorem 2. The slanting ladder graph permits the F-centroidal mean requirement for .
Proof. Let the vertex set of be and the edge set of .
Then, the following description of
is provided.
After that, the generated line assignment
is accomplished.
As a result, the graph permits the F-centroidal mean requirement. □
Theorem 3. The triangular ladder graph permits the F-centroidal mean requirement for .
Proof Let be the vertex set of .
Then, the following description of
is provided.
After that, the generated line assignment
is accomplished.
As a result, the graph permits the F-centroidal mean requirement. □
Theorem 4. The graph permits the F-centroidal mean requirement for and .
Proof. Let and be the vertices of the triangular ladder Let m represent the number of nodes in the graph . Let and be the pendant vertices attached at each and , respectively, for .
Assume that
Then, the following description of
is provided.
After that, the generated line assignment
is accomplished.
Then, the following description of
is provided.
After that, the generated line assignment
is accomplished.
As a result, the graph permits the F-centroidal mean requirement.
Figure 2 demonstrates the assignment of nodes and links of
based on the
F-centroidal mean criterion.
An F-centroidal mean labeling of for is thus obtained. □
Theorem 5. The graph permits the F-centroidal mean requirement for and .
Proof. Let and be the vertices of the slanting ladder
Then, the following description of
is provided.
After that, the generated line assignment
is accomplished.
Then, the following description of
is provided.
After that, the generated line assignment
is accomplished.
As a result, the graph permits the F-centroidal mean requirement. □
Theorem 6. The double-sided step ladder graph permits the F-centroidal mean requirement for .
Proof. Let , be the vertices of the double-sided step ladder graph .
Assume that
Then, the following description of
is provided.
After that, the generated line assignment
is accomplished.
For
the graph
is a cycle
and its
F-centroidal meanness is shown in
Figure 1.
As a result, the graph permits the F-centroidal mean requirement. □
Theorem 7. The graph permits the F-centroidal mean requirement for
Proof Let and be the vertex set and edge set of the graph
Then, the following description of is provided.
After that, the generated line assignment is accomplished.
As a result, the graph permits the F-centroidal mean requirement. □
Theorem 8. The diamond ladder graph permits the F-centroidal mean requirement for any
Proof. Let and
Then, the following description of
is provided.
After that, the generated line assignment
is accomplished.
As a result, the graph permits the F-centroidal mean requirement. □