Next Article in Journal
Principal Solutions of Recurrence Relations and Irrationality Questions in Number Theory
Next Article in Special Issue
Statistical and Ideal Convergences in Topology
Previous Article in Journal
Challenges and Opportunities for Education Systems with the Current Movement toward Digitalization at the Time of COVID-19
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pre-Hausdorffness and Hausdorffness in Quantale-Valued Gauge Spaces
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Endograph Metric and a Version of the Arzelà–Ascoli Theorem for Fuzzy Sets

Institut de Matemàtiques i Applicacions de Castelló (IMAC), Universitat Jaume I de Castelló, Av. Vicent Sos Baynat s/n, 12071 Castelló de la Plana, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2023, 11(2), 260; https://doi.org/10.3390/math11020260
Submission received: 30 November 2022 / Revised: 27 December 2022 / Accepted: 29 December 2022 / Published: 4 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Progress in General Topology and Its Applications)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we provide several Arzelà–Ascoli-type results on the space of all continuous functions from a Tychonoff space X into the fuzzy sets of R n , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) , which are upper semi-continuous and have bounded support endowed with the endograph metric. Namely, we obtain positive results when X is considered to be a k r -space and C ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) is endowed with the compact open topology, as well as when we assume that X is pseudocompact and C ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) is equipped with the uniform topology.
MSC:
03E72; 54A40; 46S40

1. Introduction

Since L.A. Zadeh introduced the notion of a fuzzy set in 1965 [1,2], its applications have covered a wide spectrum of fields of mathematics: from fuzzy logic [3,4] to fuzzy differential equations [5,6] through fuzzy control theory [7,8], fuzzy optimization theory [9,10,11,12], fuzzy analysis [13,14] or dynamical systems [15,16].
In the framework of classical analysis, Arzelà–Ascoli -type theorems are a powerful tool in the applications of function spaces. Thus, these kinds of theorems have potential applications of interest in the fuzzy context. In essence, given a function space F ( X , Y ) endowed with a topology τ , the aim is to characterize compact subsets of F ( X , Y ) . For example, the classical Arzelà–Ascoli theorem states that a subset K of the space of all real-valued continuous functions on the unit interval equipped with the unifom topology is compact if and only if K is closed, bounded and equicontinuous. Actually, given a uniform space Y, an Arzelà–Ascoli-type theorem characterizes compactness in the function space C ( X , Y ) by means of equicontinuity plus natural conditions. In fuzzy analysis, examples of this situation are the Arzelà–Ascoli-type theorems presented in [17]: the authors characterize compact subsets of C τ α ( X , ( E 1 , d ) ) , the space of all continuous functions from a Tychonoff space X into the space of real (compact) fuzzy numbers (endowed with the supremum distance) where τ α is the topology of the uniform convergence on the members of a cover α . The characterization is obtained in terms of equicontinuity plus fuzzy conditions.
Following this pattern, our goal is to obtain a fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem on space C ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) of all continuous functions from Tychonoff space X into the fuzzy sets u of R n , which are upper semi-continuous, and the support of u is a bounded set in R n endowed with the endograph metric. The function space C ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) will be equipped with the topology of uniform convergence on the members of some covers of X. Taking advantage of the fact that E n , the set of all fuzzy numbers, endowed with the endograph metric H e n d , is a closed subset of ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) , we establish the corresponding ones for C ( X , ( E n , H e n d ) ) .

2. Preliminaries

We deal with fuzzy sets on R n , i.e., functions from R n into the unit interval [ 0 , 1 ] . As usual, the symbol F ( R n ) stands for the family of all fuzzy sets on R n .
For each u F ( R n ) , let [ u ] α denote the α -cut of u, i.e.,
[ u ] α = { x R n u ( x ) α } , α ( 0 , 1 ] , cl R n { x R n u ( x ) > 0 } , α = 0 .
where, as usual, the symbol cl R n ( A ) stands for the closure of a subset A of R n . Notice that [ u ] 0 is the support of u. We will now consider the subset F U S C B ( R n ) of F ( R n ) of all fuzzy sets u, which are upper semi-continuous, and [ u ] 0 is a bounded set in R n equipped with the endograph metric H e n d . It is worth noting that, if u F U S C B ( R n ) , then [ u ] 0 is a closed bounded subset of R n . Consequently, it is a compact set. This implies that for all α [ 0 , 1 ] , [ u ] α is compact as well: indeed, since u is upper semi-continuous, [ u ] α is closed; the result now follows from the fact that [ u ] α [ u ] 0 .
In order to introduce the endograph metric, we first need to define the Hausdorff metric H on the set K ( R n ) of all nonempty compact subsets of R n . To do this, given A , B K ( R n ) , consider
D ( A , B ) = sup a A d ( a , B ) = sup a A inf b B d ( a , b ) ,
where d stands for the Euclidean metric on R n . Now, the Hausdorff metric H is defined as
H ( K 1 , K 2 ) = max { D ( K 1 , K 2 ) , D ( K 2 , K 1 ) }
for all K 1 , K 2 K ( R n ) .
Given u F ( R n ) , the endograph of u is defined as
end u = { ( x , t ) R n × [ 0 , 1 ] u ( x ) t } .
and the endograph metric H e n d is defined by using the Hausdorff metric H:
H e n d ( u , v ) = H ( end u , end v ) .
The endograph metric was introduced by Kloeden in the family of all semi-continuous fuzzy sets by means of the so-called extended Hausdorff distance (See [18] for details. See also [19].).
Given a Tychonoff space, X, we will present Arzelà–Ascoli-type theorems on the function space C τ α ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) where τ α is the topology of uniform convergence on members of special covers α of X. It is worth remarking that the space C τ α ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) is a Tychonoff space: indeed, the family of all subsets U ( A , ε ) of C ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) × C ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) of the form
{ ( f , g ) C ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) × C ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) sup a A H e n d ( f ( a ) , g ( a ) ) < ε } ,
for all A α and all ε > 0 , is a subbase for a (Hausdorff) uniformity U α on the function space C ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) , which induces the topology τ α . The closure of a subset S in the τ α topology will be denoted by cl τ α A .
Recall that space X is a k r -space if every real-valued continuous function that is continuous on the compact sets is continuous on the whole X. It is a well-known fact that it is possible to replace real-valued by into any Tychonoff space. In particular, we can replace real-valued by into ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) . Wpace X is pseudocompact if every real-valued continuous function on X is bounded. Equivalently, any locally finite sequence of pairwise disjoint open sets in X is finite. Our main results establish that our fuzzy version of Arzelà–Ascoli theorem is satisfied when: (1) X is a k r -space and C ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) is endowed with the compact open topology, and (2) X is pseudocompact and C ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) is equipped with the uniform topology. Moreover, the converse of (2) is also valid. The results also apply in the case of fuzzy numbers.
Our terminology and notation are standard. For instance, N stands for the set of natural numbers and f | A means the restriction of a function f to a subset A. We denote by R m the product space of m copies of the reals. The symbol C ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) (respectively, C ( X , ( E n , H e n d ) ) stands for the set of all continuous functions from X into ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) (respectively, into ( E n , H e n d ) ) . Notice that we obtain τ p , the topology of the pointwise convergence, by taking α the cover of X consisting of its points or, equivalently, of all its finite subsets. If α = { X } , then we obtain the topology, τ u , of uniform convergence on X. The cover k of all compact subsets of a topological space X induces the so-called compact-open topology on C ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) denoted by τ c o . It is worth noting that the pointwise convergence topology on the set of all functions from X into F U S C B ( R n ) coincides with the product topology on ( F U S C B ( R n ) X . This is equivalent to considering τ p on C ( X , F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) when X is endowed with the discrete topology. Throughout the whole paper, space means a Tychonoff space. For notions that are not explicitly defined here, the reader might consult [20].

3. Results

Given subset B F U S C B ( R n ) and α ( 0 , 1 ] , we define
B ( α ) = u B [ u ] α .
Our starting point is the following theorem by H. Huang:
Theorem 1
([21], Theorem 8.6). Subset B ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) is relatively compact if and only if the following hold:
(i)
For each α ( 0 , 1 ] , B ( α ) is a bounded subset in R n ;
(ii)
Given sequence { u n } n = 1 B , there exists r ( 0 , 1 ] and a subsequence, { u n k } k = 1 of { u n } n = 1 B , such that lim k [ u n k ] r = 0 .
A fuzzy set u F U S C B ( R n ) is called a fuzzy number if it is normal; that is, there exists x R n such that u ( x ) = 1 , and u is fuzzy convex, that is, u ( λ x + ( 1 λ ) y ) min { u ( x ) , u ( y ) } for all x , y R n and λ [ 0 , 1 ] . The set of all fuzzy numbers is denoted by E n . It is worth noting that R n is a closed subset of ( E n , H e n d ) : indeed, for each x R n , it suffices to consider the fuzzy set defined by the characteristic function of { x } . Moreover, it is well known that ( E n , H e n d ) is a closed subspace of ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) (see, for example, [21], p. 79). Thus, the following result is a straightforward consequence of Theorem 1.
Theorem 2.
Subset B ( E n , H e n d ) is relatively compact if and only if the following hold:
(i)
For each α [ 0 , 1 ] , B ( α ) is a bounded subset in R n ;
(ii)
Given sequence { u n } n = 1 B , there exists r ( 0 , 1 ] and a subsequence, { u n k } k = 1 of { u n } n = 1 B , such that lim k [ u n k ] r = 0 .
With Theorem 1 in mind, we prove a version of Arzelà–Ascoli theorem when working with the endograph metric on F U S C B ( R n ) . First, some definitions:
Definition 1.
Subset  M C ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) )  is said to be pointwise level bounded if  { f ( x ) ( α ) f M }  is bounded in  R n  for all  x X  and all  α ( 0 , 1 ] .
Definition 2.
Subset  M C ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) )  is said to be pointwise-approached to zero if  { f ( x ) f M }  satisfies condition (ii) of Theorem 1 for all  x X .
Recall that M C ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) is equicontinuous if for each x X and each ε > 0 , there is a neighborhood V of x such that H e n d ( f i ( y ) , f i ( x ) ) < ε for all y V and all f M .
The function space C τ ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) is said to satisfy the weak fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem if each τ -closed, pointwise-level-bounded, equicontinuous, and pointwise-approached-to-zero subset of C τ ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) is τ -compact. If the converse is also valid, then we say that C τ ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) satisfies the fuzzy Arzelà-Ascoli theorem.
We need the following:
Theorem 3.
For any space X, a subset M of ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) X is τ p -relatively compact if and only if the following two conditions are satisfied:
(i)
M is pointwise-level-bounded.
(ii)
M is pointwise-approached to zero.
Proof. 
To prove necessity, consider the τ p -compact subset M of ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) X . The projection map π x : M ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) defined for all x X , as π x ( f ) = f ( x ) is continuous so that f ( x ) : f M is a compact subset of ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) . It suffices now to apply Theorem 1. For sufficiency, assume that M satisfies conditions (i)–(ii). Using Theorem 1, for each x X , the set { f ( x ) f M } is relatively compact in ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) . Thus, C = cl τ p x X { f ( x ) f M } is τ p -compact. The result now follows from the fact that the τ p -closure of M is included in C. □
We now address the weak fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem. Let ρ denote the cover of X whose members are the pseudocompact subsets of X. We have:
Theorem 4.
If α ρ is a cover of a space X, then C τ α ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) satisfies the weak fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
Proof. 
Let K be a τ p -closed, pointwise-level-bounded, equicontinuous, pointwise-approached-to-zero subset of C τ α ( X , F U S C B ( R n , H e n d ) ) . The previous theorem tells us that cl τ p K is compact. Consider now the pseudocompact subset P α . Using Theorem 7.14 and Theorem 7.15 in [22], the evaluation mapping
e : cl τ p K × P ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ( f , x ) f ( x )
is a continuous function. Let { f i } i I be a net in C τ α ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) converging to the function f 0 . Since α is a cover of X, we have τ α τ p . Therefore, { f i } i I τ p -converges to f 0 . Define now the following real-valued continuous function:
ϕ : cl τ p K × P ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) R ( f , x ) f ( x ) H e n d ( f ( x ) , f 0 ( x ) )
cl τ p K being compact, the product space cl τ p K × P is pseudocompact ([20], Theorem 3.10.26). Therefore, by a lemma of Frolík ([23], Lemma 1.3), the function G from cl τ p K into the reals defined as
G ( f ) = sup x P ϕ ( f , x ) = sup x P H e n d ( f ( x ) , f 0 ( x ) ) ,
for all f c l τ p K , is continuous. Thus, G ( f i ) converges to G ( f 0 ) . In other words, we have just proved that sup x P H e n d ( f i ( x ) , f 0 ( x ) ) converges to sup x P H e n d ( f 0 ( x ) , f 0 ( x ) ) = 0 . This means that { f i } i I converges uniformly to f 0 on P. Since P is an arbitrary member of the cover α , we have just proved that { f i } i I τ α -converges to f 0 . This fact implies that the inclusion map from cl τ p K into C τ α ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) is continuous so that c l τ p K is τ α -compact. The result now follows from the fact that the τ α -closure of K is included in its τ p -closure. □
Throughout what follows, we shall freely use without explicit mention the elementary fact that, being ( E 1 , H e n d ) closed in ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) , the function space C ( X , ( E 1 , H e n d ) ) is closed in C τ α ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) . Thus, we have
Corollary 1.
Let X be a space. If α is a cover of X with α ρ , then C τ α ( X , ( E 1 , H e n d ) ) satisfies the weak fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
Next, we will present an example of a function space that satisfies the weak fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem but fails to satisfy the fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem. Given a product space X × Y , let ϕ X denote the natural injection
ϕ X : ( R ) X 1 × X 2 ( R X 2 ) X 1 .
The map ϕ X is a homeomorphism. We denote by β ( Z ) the Stone–Čech compactification of a space Z.
Example 1.
Let X , Y be two pseudocompact spaces such that X × Y is not pseudocompact. According to Proposition 1.12 in [24], there exists a continuous function f on X × Y that admits a separately continuous extension to β ( X ) × β ( Y ) . According to Proposition 1 in [25], the closure, say K , of ϕ X 1 ( f ) in C p ( X 2 ) is compact. Suppose now that K is equicontinuous for a compatible metric on R . As in Theorem 4, the evaluation map e from K × X 2 into R is continuous. Since f = e ( ϕ X 1 ( f ) × id X ) , f is a continuous function. This contradiction shows that the compact set K is not equicontinuous.
As a straightforward consequence of the previous example, we obtain
Theorem 5.
If a metric space ( X , d ) contains a closed copy of the reals, then there exists a pseudocompact space Y such that C p ( Y , ( X , d ) ) contains a compact subset that is not equicontinuous.
Corollary 2.
There exists a pseudocompact space X such that C τ p ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) (respectively, C p ( X , ( E 1 , H e n d ) ) ) does not satisy the fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
Remark 1.
It is clear that we can replace metric space by uniform space in Theorem 5.
We now turn our attention to the fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem. We say that a space X is a ρ r -space if a real-valued function (equivalently, a function into a Tychonoff space) is continuous whenever its restriction to any pseudocompact subset of X is continuous.
Theorem 6.
If X is a ρ r -space, then C τ ρ ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) satisfies the fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
Proof. 
According to Theorem 4, we only need to prove that a compact subset K of C τ ρ ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) is τ ρ -closed, pointwise-level-bounded, pointwise-approached to zero and equicontinuous. To do this, consider P ρ and the evaluation map
e P : K × P ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ( f , x ) f ( x )
Since τ ρ induces the topology of uniform convergence on P, a standard argument by using triangle inequality shows that e P is continuous. Now, since the product of a compact space and a ρ r -space is a ρ r -space ([26]), the evaluation map from K × X into ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) is continuous. Thus, K is equicontinuous ([22], Theorem 7.19, Theorem 7.20). Since τ α τ p , the results now follows from Theorem 3. □
Corollary 3.
If X is a ρ r -space, then C τ ρ ( X , ( E n , H e n d ) ) satisfies the fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
Recall that space S is said to be locally pseudocompact (respectively, locally compact) if every x X has a pseudocompact (respectively, compact) neighborhood.
Corollary 4.
If X is a locally pseudocompact space, then C τ ρ ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) (respectively, C τ ρ ( X , ( E n , H e n d ) ) ) satisfies the fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
Corollary 5.
If X is a locally compact space, then C τ c o ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) (respectively, C τ c o ( X , ( E n , H e n d ) ) ) satisfies the fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
An argument similar to the one used in Theorem 6 yields
Theorem 7.
If X is a k r -space, then C τ c o ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) (respectively, C τ c o ( X , ( E n , H e n d ) ) ) satisfies the fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
Corollary 6.
If X is a locally compact space, then C τ c o ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) (respectively, C τ ρ ( X , ( E n , H e n d ) ) ) satisfies the fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
Corollary 7.
If X is a compact space, then C τ u ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) (respectively, C τ u ( X , ( E n , H e n d ) ) ) satisfies the fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
This last result can be improved by characterizing spaces X such that the topology of uniform convergence τ u on C ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) satisfies the fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem. If X is a pseudocompact space, we will use the notion that C τ u ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) is metrizable. Indeed, the set of the form
( f , g ) C ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) × C ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) sup a P H e n d ( f ( a ) , g ( a ) ) < 1 n ,
is a subbase for a uniformity U on C ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) inducing the uniform convergence topology τ u . Thus, the uniformity U has a countable base, and, consequently, it is metrizable (see, e.g., [20], Theorem 8.1.12).
Theorem 8.
For a space X, the following conditions are equivalent:
(i)
X is pseudocompact.
(ii)
C τ u ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) satisfies fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
(iii)
C τ u ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) satisfies the weak fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
Proof. 
(1)⟹(2) follows from Theorem 6 and (2)⟹(3) is obvious. We show (3)⟹(1). We take advantage of the fact that ( E 1 , H e n d ) and, a posteriori, ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) contains a (closed) copy of the reals. Suppose that X is not pseudocompact. Then, we can find an infinite sequence { U n } n = 1 of pairwise disjoint open sets that is locally finite. For each n N , pick x n U n . X being a Tychonoff space, there exists a continuous function f n from X into the reals such that f n | X \ U n 0 and f n ( x n ) = n . It is clear that the sequence { f n } n = 1 pointwise-converges to the zero function. Thus, { f n } n = 1 is relatively τ p - compact. Since the τ u -closure of our sequence is contained in its τ p -closure, Theorem 3 tells us that the τ u -closure of { f n } n = 1 is pointwise-level-bounded and pointwise-approached to zero. We shall prove that the τ u -closure of { f n } n = 1 is equicontinuous. Notice that, since τ u τ p , it suffices to prove that the sequence { f n } n = 1 is equicontinuous (see [20], Theorem 7.14). Let x X . Since all the functions f n vanish outside n = 1 U n and the sequence { U n } n = 1 is locally finite, it is an easy matter to prove that { f n } n = 1 is equicontinuous at x. Assume now that there is n N with x U n . Given ε > 0 , there exists a neighborhood W U n such that H e n d ( f ( y ) , f ( x ) ) < ε for all y W . The results now follows from the fact that f m | X \ U n 0 for all m n . We conclude the proof by showing that the τ u -closure of { f n } n = 1 is not τ u -compact. Taking into account that the topology τ u is metrizable and our sequence pointwise-converges to zero, it suffices to prove that any subsequence of { f n } n = 1 does not converge to zero. But this fact is a straightforward consequence of the definition of f n for each n N . The proof is complete. □
Corollary 8.
For a space X, the following conditions are equivalent:
(i)
X is pseudocompact.
(ii)
C τ u ( X , ( E 1 , H e n d ) ) satisfies fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
(iii)
C τ u ( X , ( E 1 , H e n d ) ) satisfies the weak fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
With each compact space being pseudocompact, the implication (1)⟹(2) of the previous theorem implies Corollary 7.
We close the paper with some applications of the previous results. In the outstanding paper [23], Frolík introduced the class B of all pseudocompact spaces X such that the product space X × Y is also pseudocompact for every pseudocompact space Y. Noble [27], later, showed that B is closed by taking arbitrary products. Moreover, by a result of Tkachenko [28], every pseudocompact topological group belongs to B (see also [29]). Thus, we have
Corollary 9.
If X = i I X i is an arbitrary product of pseudocompact spaces in class B (in particular, if X is an arbitray product of pseudocompact groups), then X satisfies Theorem 8 and Corollary 8.
k r -spaces play an important role in funcional analysis. A special class of this kind of spaces comprises k r -pseudocompact spaces. Noble showed [30] that an arbitrary product of k r -pseudocompact spaces is a k r -pseudocompact space as well. Therefore, we have
Corollary 10.
If X = i I X i is an arbitrary product of k r -pseudocompact spaces, then the following conditions hold:
(i)
X satisfies Theorem 8 and Corollary 8.
(ii)
C τ c o ( X , ( F U S C B ( R n ) , H e n d ) ) and C τ c o ( X , ( E 1 , H e n d ) ) satisfy fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.

4. Conclusions

In classical analysis, Arzelà–Ascoli-type theorem characterizes compactness in function spaces. The aim of this manuscript is to investigate a fuzzy-type Arzelà–Ascoli theorem. The authors introduce weak fuzzy Arzelà-Ascoli theorem and fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem, and provide several sufficient conditions for a function space to satisfy (weak) fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem. Using a counterexample, it is shown that weak fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem is not equivalent to fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem, and it is proved that the function space in question satisfies (weak) fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem if and only if X is pseudocompact. Some applications of these results are also given. Our results are expected to be applied in future research in fields such as fuzzy differential equations and optimization theory.

Author Contributions

J.J.F., S.M. and M.S. contributed equally in writing this article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Research supported by Spanish AEI Project PID2019-106529GB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zadeh, L.A. Fuzzy Sets. Inf. Control 1965, 8, 338–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Zadeh, L.A. Fuzzy sets and systems. In Proceedings of the Symposium on System Theory; Polytechnic Press of Polytechnic Inst. of Brooklyn: Bronklyn, NY, USA, 1965; pp. 9–37. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dombi, J.; Jónás, T. Generalizing the sigmoid function using continuous-valued logic. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2022, 449, 79–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zand, B.; Ghaderi, P.; Amini, F. Structural system identification via syncronization technique and fuzzy logic. Mat. Comput. Simul. 2023, 203, 174–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Khan, A.; Shafqat, R.; Azmat, U.K. Existence results of fuzzy delay impulsive fractional differential equations by fixed point theory approach. J. Funct. Spaces 2022, 13, 4123949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, Y.; Liu, B. Residual analysis and parameter estimation of uncertain differential equations. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak. 2022, 21, 513–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hao, S.; Xue, H.; Pan, Y. Adaptive fuzzy dual-performance fault-tolerant control for interconnected nonlinear systems. Internat. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process 2021, 35, 1685–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Song, A.; Rai, J.N. Stability analysis of fractional order fuzzy cellular neural nerworks with leakage delay and time varying delays. Chin. J. Phys. 2021, 73, 589–599. [Google Scholar]
  9. Agarwal, D.; Singh, P. Riemman integrability based optimality criteria for fractional optimization problems with fuzzy parameters. Optim. Control. Appl. Methods 2022, 43, 722–739. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hosseini, A.; Pishvaee, M.S. Capacity reliability under uncertainty in transportation networks: An optimization framework and stability assessment methodology. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak. 2022, 21, 479–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, L.; Qin, X. Strong convergence theorems for solving pseudo-monotone variational inequality problems and applications. Optimization 2022, 71, 3603–3626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Khan, V.A.; Makharesh, A.A.H.; Alshlool, K.M.A.S.; Abdullah, S.A.A. On spaces of intuitionistic fuzzy Zweier lacunary ideal convergence of sequences. Commun. Optim. Theory 2018, 10. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wu, C.; Gong, Z. On Hestock integral of fuzzy-number-valued functions (I). Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2001, 120, 523–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wu, C.X.; Wu, C. Some notes on the supremum and infimum of the set of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1999, 103, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Daniel, J.; Sánchez, I.; Sanchis, M. Transitivity in Fuzzy Hyperspaces. Mathematics 2020, 8, 1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Najariyan, M. Pariz, Naser, Stability and controllability of fuzzy singular dynamical systems. J. Franklin Inst. 2022, 359, 8171–8187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Font, J.J.; Sanchis, D.; Sanchis, M. Completness, metrizability and compactness in spaces of fuzzy-number-valued functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2018, 353, 124–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kloeden, P.E. Compact supported endographs and fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1980, 4, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, Z.; Zhang, L. The topological structure of fuzzy sets with endograph metric. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2009, 160, 2937–2946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Engelking, R. General Topology, 2nd ed.; Sigma Series in Pure Mathematics; Heldermann Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1989; Volume 6. [Google Scholar]
  21. Huang, H. Characterizations of endograph metric and Γ-convergence on fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2018, 350, 55–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kelley, J.L. General Topology; D. van Nostrand Company Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1955. [Google Scholar]
  23. Frolík, Z. Topological product of two pseudocompact spaces. Czechoslov. Math. J. 1960, 10, 339–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Reznichenko, E. Extension of functions defined on products of pseudocompact spaces and continuity of the inverse in pseudocompact groups. Top. Appl. 1994, 59, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Reznichenko, E. Functions on products of pseudocompact spaces. Top. Appl. 2022, 307, 107935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Blasco, J.L. On the product of two br-spaces and the class B of Frolík. Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 1982, 40, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Noble, N. Countably compact and pseudo-compact products. Czechoslov. Math. J. 1969, 19, 390–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tkačenko, M.G. Compactness type properties in topological groups. Czechoslov. Math. J. 1988, 38, 324–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Comfort, W.W.; Ross, K.A. Pseudocompactness and uniform continuity in topological groups. Pacific J. Math. 1966, 16, 483–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Noble, N. The continuity of functions on Cartesian products. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 1970, 149, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Font, J.J.; Macario, S.; Sanchis, M. Endograph Metric and a Version of the Arzelà–Ascoli Theorem for Fuzzy Sets. Mathematics 2023, 11, 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11020260

AMA Style

Font JJ, Macario S, Sanchis M. Endograph Metric and a Version of the Arzelà–Ascoli Theorem for Fuzzy Sets. Mathematics. 2023; 11(2):260. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11020260

Chicago/Turabian Style

Font, Juan J., Sergio Macario, and Manuel Sanchis. 2023. "Endograph Metric and a Version of the Arzelà–Ascoli Theorem for Fuzzy Sets" Mathematics 11, no. 2: 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11020260

APA Style

Font, J. J., Macario, S., & Sanchis, M. (2023). Endograph Metric and a Version of the Arzelà–Ascoli Theorem for Fuzzy Sets. Mathematics, 11(2), 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11020260

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop