1. Introduction
Since L.A. Zadeh introduced the notion of a fuzzy set in 1965 [
1,
2], its applications have covered a wide spectrum of fields of mathematics: from fuzzy logic [
3,
4] to fuzzy differential equations [
5,
6] through fuzzy control theory [
7,
8], fuzzy optimization theory [
9,
10,
11,
12], fuzzy analysis [
13,
14] or dynamical systems [
15,
16].
In the framework of classical analysis, Arzelà–Ascoli
-type theorems are a powerful tool in the applications of function spaces. Thus, these kinds of theorems have potential applications of interest in the fuzzy context. In essence, given a function space
endowed with a topology
, the aim is to characterize compact subsets of
. For example, the classical Arzelà–Ascoli theorem states that a subset
K of the space of all real-valued continuous functions on the unit interval equipped with the unifom topology is compact if and only if
K is closed, bounded and equicontinuous. Actually, given a uniform space
Y, an Arzelà–Ascoli-type theorem characterizes compactness in the function space
by means of equicontinuity plus
natural conditions. In fuzzy analysis, examples of this situation are the Arzelà–Ascoli-type theorems presented in [
17]: the authors characterize compact subsets of
, the space of all continuous functions from a Tychonoff space
X into the space of real (compact) fuzzy numbers (endowed with the supremum distance) where
is the topology of the uniform convergence on the members of a cover
. The characterization is obtained in terms of equicontinuity
plus fuzzy conditions.
Following this pattern, our goal is to obtain a fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem on space of all continuous functions from Tychonoff space X into the fuzzy sets u of , which are upper semi-continuous, and the support of u is a bounded set in endowed with the endograph metric. The function space will be equipped with the topology of uniform convergence on the members of some covers of X. Taking advantage of the fact that , the set of all fuzzy numbers, endowed with the endograph metric , is a closed subset of , we establish the corresponding ones for .
2. Preliminaries
We deal with fuzzy sets on , i.e., functions from into the unit interval . As usual, the symbol stands for the family of all fuzzy sets on .
For each
, let
denote the
-cut of
u, i.e.,
where, as usual, the symbol
stands for the closure of a subset
A of
. Notice that
is the support of
u. We will now consider the subset
of
of all fuzzy sets
u, which are upper semi-continuous, and
is a bounded set in
equipped with the endograph metric
. It is worth noting that, if
, then
is a closed bounded subset of
. Consequently, it is a compact set. This implies that for all
,
is compact as well: indeed, since
u is upper semi-continuous,
is closed; the result now follows from the fact that
.
In order to introduce the endograph metric, we first need to define the
Hausdorff metric H on the set
of all nonempty compact subsets of
. To do this, given
, consider
where
d stands for the Euclidean metric on
. Now, the Hausdorff metric
H is defined as
for all
.
Given
, the endograph of
u is defined as
and the endograph metric
is defined by using the Hausdorff metric
H:
The endograph metric was introduced by Kloeden in the family of all semi-continuous fuzzy sets by means of the so-called
extended Hausdorff distance (See [
18] for details. See also [
19].).
Given a Tychonoff space,
X, we will present Arzelà–Ascoli-type theorems on the function space
where
is the topology of uniform convergence on members of special covers
of
X. It is worth remarking that the space
is a Tychonoff space: indeed, the family of all subsets
of
of the form
for all
and all
, is a subbase for a (Hausdorff) uniformity
on the function space
, which induces the topology
. The closure of a subset
S in the
topology will be denoted by
Recall that space X is a -space if every real-valued continuous function that is continuous on the compact sets is continuous on the whole X. It is a well-known fact that it is possible to replace real-valued by into any Tychonoff space. In particular, we can replace real-valued by into . Wpace X is pseudocompact if every real-valued continuous function on X is bounded. Equivalently, any locally finite sequence of pairwise disjoint open sets in X is finite. Our main results establish that our fuzzy version of Arzelà–Ascoli theorem is satisfied when: (1) X is a -space and is endowed with the compact open topology, and (2) X is pseudocompact and is equipped with the uniform topology. Moreover, the converse of (2) is also valid. The results also apply in the case of fuzzy numbers.
Our terminology and notation are standard. For instance,
stands for the set of natural numbers and
means the restriction of a function
f to a subset
A. We denote by
the product space of
m copies of the reals. The symbol
(respectively,
stands for the set of all continuous functions from
X into
(respectively, into
Notice that we obtain
, the topology of the pointwise convergence, by taking
the cover of
X consisting of its points or, equivalently, of all its finite subsets. If
, then we obtain the topology,
, of uniform convergence on
X. The cover
k of all compact subsets of a topological space
X induces the so-called compact-open topology on
denoted by
. It is worth noting that the pointwise convergence topology on the set of all functions from
X into
coincides with the product topology on
. This is equivalent to considering
on
when
X is endowed with the discrete topology. Throughout the whole paper,
space means a
Tychonoff space. For notions that are not explicitly defined here, the reader might consult [
20].
3. Results
Given subset
and
, we define
Our starting point is the following theorem by H. Huang:
Theorem 1 ([
21], Theorem 8.6).
Subset is relatively compact if and only if the following hold: - (i)
For each , is a bounded subset in ;
- (ii)
Given sequence , there exists and a subsequence, of , such that
A fuzzy set
is called a
fuzzy number if it is normal; that is, there exists
such that
, and
u is
fuzzy convex, that is,
for all
and
. The set of all fuzzy numbers is denoted by
. It is worth noting that
is a closed subset of
: indeed, for each
, it suffices to consider the fuzzy set defined by the characteristic function of
. Moreover, it is well known that
is a closed subspace of
(see, for example, [
21], p. 79). Thus, the following result is a straightforward consequence of Theorem 1.
Theorem 2. Subset is relatively compact if and only if the following hold:
- (i)
For each , is a bounded subset in ;
- (ii)
Given sequence , there exists and a subsequence, of , such that
With Theorem 1 in mind, we prove a version of Arzelà–Ascoli theorem when working with the endograph metric on . First, some definitions:
Definition 1. Subset is said to be pointwise level bounded if is bounded in for all and all .
Definition 2. Subset is said to be pointwise-approached to zero if satisfies condition (ii) of Theorem 1 for all .
Recall that is equicontinuous if for each and each , there is a neighborhood V of x such that for all and all .
The function space is said to satisfy the weak fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem if each -closed, pointwise-level-bounded, equicontinuous, and pointwise-approached-to-zero subset of is -compact. If the converse is also valid, then we say that satisfies the fuzzy Arzelà-Ascoli theorem.
We need the following:
Theorem 3. For any space X, a subset of is -relatively compact if and only if the following two conditions are satisfied:
- (i)
is pointwise-level-bounded.
- (ii)
is pointwise-approached to zero.
Proof. To prove necessity, consider the -compact subset of . The projection map defined for all , as is continuous so that is a compact subset of . It suffices now to apply Theorem 1. For sufficiency, assume that satisfies conditions (i)–(ii). Using Theorem 1, for each , the set is relatively compact in . Thus, is -compact. The result now follows from the fact that the -closure of is included in C. □
We now address the weak fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem. Let denote the cover of X whose members are the pseudocompact subsets of X. We have:
Theorem 4. If is a cover of a space X, then satisfies the weak fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
Proof. Let
be a
-closed, pointwise-level-bounded, equicontinuous, pointwise-approached-to-zero subset of
. The previous theorem tells us that
is compact. Consider now the pseudocompact subset
. Using Theorem 7.14 and Theorem 7.15 in [
22], the evaluation mapping
is a continuous function. Let
be a net in
converging to the function
. Since
is a cover of
X, we have
. Therefore,
-converges to
. Define now the following real-valued continuous function:
being compact, the product space
is pseudocompact ([
20], Theorem 3.10.26). Therefore, by a lemma of Frolík ([
23], Lemma 1.3), the function
G from
into the reals defined as
for all
, is continuous. Thus,
converges to
. In other words, we have just proved that
converges to
This means that
converges uniformly to
on
P. Since
P is an arbitrary member of the cover
, we have just proved that
-converges to
. This fact implies that the inclusion map from
into
is continuous so that
is
-compact. The result now follows from the fact that the
-closure of
is included in its
-closure. □
Throughout what follows, we shall freely use without explicit mention the elementary fact that, being closed in , the function space is closed in . Thus, we have
Corollary 1. Let X be a space. If α is a cover of X with , then satisfies the weak fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
Next, we will present an example of a function space that satisfies the weak fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem but fails to satisfy the fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem. Given a product space
, let
denote the natural injection
The map is a homeomorphism. We denote by the Stone–Čech compactification of a space Z.
Example 1. Let
be two pseudocompact spaces such that
is not pseudocompact. According to Proposition 1.12 in [
24], there exists a continuous function
f on
that admits a separately continuous extension to
. According to Proposition 1 in [
25], the closure, say
, of
in
is compact. Suppose now that
is equicontinuous for a compatible metric on
. As in Theorem 4, the evaluation map
e from
into
is continuous. Since
,
f is a continuous function. This contradiction shows that the compact set
is not equicontinuous.
As a straightforward consequence of the previous example, we obtain
Theorem 5. If a metric space contains a closed copy of the reals, then there exists a pseudocompact space Y such that contains a compact subset that is not equicontinuous.
Corollary 2. There exists a pseudocompact space X such that (respectively, ) does not satisy the fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
Remark 1. It is clear that we can replace metric space by uniform space in Theorem 5.
We now turn our attention to the fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem. We say that a space X is a -space if a real-valued function (equivalently, a function into a Tychonoff space) is continuous whenever its restriction to any pseudocompact subset of X is continuous.
Theorem 6. If X is a -space, then satisfies the fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
Proof. According to Theorem 4, we only need to prove that a compact subset
of
is
-closed, pointwise-level-bounded, pointwise-approached to zero and equicontinuous. To do this, consider
and the evaluation map
Since
induces the topology of uniform convergence on
P, a standard argument by using triangle inequality shows that
is continuous. Now, since the product of a compact space and a
-space is a
-space ([
26]), the evaluation map from
into
is continuous. Thus,
is equicontinuous ([
22], Theorem 7.19, Theorem 7.20). Since
, the results now follows from Theorem 3. □
Corollary 3. If X is a -space, then satisfies the fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
Recall that space S is said to be locally pseudocompact (respectively, locally compact) if every has a pseudocompact (respectively, compact) neighborhood.
Corollary 4. If X is a locally pseudocompact space, then (respectively, ) satisfies the fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
Corollary 5. If X is a locally compact space, then (respectively, ) satisfies the fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
An argument similar to the one used in Theorem 6 yields
Theorem 7. If X is a -space, then (respectively, ) satisfies the fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
Corollary 6. If X is a locally compact space, then (respectively, ) satisfies the fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
Corollary 7. If X is a compact space, then (respectively, ) satisfies the fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
This last result can be improved by characterizing spaces
X such that the topology of uniform convergence
on
satisfies the fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem. If
X is a pseudocompact space, we will use the notion that
is metrizable. Indeed, the set of the form
is a subbase for a uniformity
on
inducing the uniform convergence topology
. Thus, the uniformity
has a countable base, and, consequently, it is metrizable (see, e.g., [
20], Theorem 8.1.12).
Theorem 8. For a space X, the following conditions are equivalent:
- (i)
X is pseudocompact.
- (ii)
satisfies fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
- (iii)
satisfies the weak fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
Proof. (1)⟹(2) follows from Theorem 6 and (2)⟹(3) is obvious. We show (3)⟹(1). We take advantage of the fact that
and, a posteriori,
contains a (closed) copy of the reals. Suppose that
X is not pseudocompact. Then, we can find an infinite sequence
of pairwise disjoint open sets that is locally finite. For each
, pick
.
X being a Tychonoff space, there exists a continuous function
from
X into the reals such that
and
. It is clear that the sequence
pointwise-converges to the zero function. Thus,
is relatively
- compact. Since the
-closure of our sequence is contained in its
-closure, Theorem 3 tells us that the
-closure of
is pointwise-level-bounded and pointwise-approached to zero. We shall prove that the
-closure of
is equicontinuous. Notice that, since
, it suffices to prove that the sequence
is equicontinuous (see [
20], Theorem 7.14). Let
. Since all the functions
vanish outside
and the sequence
is locally finite, it is an easy matter to prove that
is equicontinuous at
x. Assume now that there is
with
. Given
, there exists a neighborhood
such that
for all
. The results now follows from the fact that
for all
. We conclude the proof by showing that the
-closure of
is not
-compact. Taking into account that the topology
is metrizable and our sequence pointwise-converges to zero, it suffices to prove that any subsequence of
does not converge to zero. But this fact is a straightforward consequence of the definition of
for each
. The proof is complete. □
Corollary 8. For a space X, the following conditions are equivalent:
- (i)
X is pseudocompact.
- (ii)
satisfies fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
- (iii)
satisfies the weak fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.
With each compact space being pseudocompact, the implication (1)⟹(2) of the previous theorem implies Corollary 7.
We close the paper with some applications of the previous results. In the outstanding paper [
23], Frolík introduced the class
of all pseudocompact spaces
X such that the product space
is also pseudocompact for every pseudocompact space
Y. Noble [
27], later, showed that
is closed by taking arbitrary products. Moreover, by a result of Tkachenko [
28], every pseudocompact topological group belongs to
(see also [
29]). Thus, we have
Corollary 9. If is an arbitrary product of pseudocompact spaces in class (in particular, if X is an arbitray product of pseudocompact groups), then X satisfies Theorem 8 and Corollary 8.
-spaces play an important role in funcional analysis. A special class of this kind of spaces comprises
-pseudocompact spaces. Noble showed [
30] that an arbitrary product of
-pseudocompact spaces is a
-pseudocompact space as well. Therefore, we have
Corollary 10. If is an arbitrary product of -pseudocompact spaces, then the following conditions hold:
- (i)
X satisfies Theorem 8 and Corollary 8.
- (ii)
and satisfy fuzzy Arzelà–Ascoli theorem.