2. Almost Right Primary Ideals
Definition 1. Let R be a ring.
- (1)
An ideal P of R is called a principally almost right primary ideal if, whenever A and B are (principal) ideals of R with and , then either or , for some . In the case that , then an almost right primary ideal is referred to as an almost prime ideal.
- (2)
An ideal P of R is called a principally almost nilary ideal if, whenever A and B are (principal) ideals of R with and , then either or , for some . In the case that , then a principally almost nilary ideal is referred to as a principally almost right primary ideal.
- (3)
A right ideal P of R is called a principally almost right primary right ideal if, whenever A and B are (principal) right ideals of R with and , then either or , for some .
Similar to in Definition 1, a principally almost left primary can be defined, a prime ideal is the right or left almost primary ideal, and every almost right or left primary ideal is an almost nilary ideal. In addition, an almost nilary ideal is an almost right or left primary ideal.
Example 1. (i) It is clear from Definition 1 that 0 is always an almost right primary (almost nilary) ideal; however, it is not a nilary or right primary ideal in general.
(ii) One can see that every prime, almost prime, right primary, and weakly right primary ideal is an almost right primary ideal. Hence, the concept of almost right primary ideals is a generalization of almost prime and weakly prime ideals, and, therefore, of prime ideals.
(iii) Every almost right primary ideal is an almost nilary ideal.
(iv) Let , where F is a field and . P is not a primary ideal since but and for all . However, P is an almost nilary ideal since it is a nilary ideal via [5]. (v) Example 2 provides an almost right primary ideal that is neither a nilary nor right primary ideal.
Proposition 1. Every (principally) weakly right primary ideal P of a ring R is a principally almost right primary ideal.
Proof. Suppose that and for any (principal) ideals A and B of R, then . Thus, either or , for some . □
Recall that an ideal P of a ring R is called a semiprime ideal, whenever implies for any ideal A of R.
Proposition 2. Let P be a semiprime ideal of a ring R, then P is an almost prime ideal if and only if P is an almost right primary (an almost nilary) ideal.
Proof. If P is an almost prime ideal, then clearly it is an almost right primary (an almost nilary) ideal. Conversely suppose that , and , for any ideals A and B of R. If , then there exists such that and, hence, for every . Thus, since P is a semiprime ideal. Then, ; by repeating the process, we can obtain and, hence, . □
Remark 1. Let R be a commutative ring with identity. An ideal P of R satisfying the condition in Definition 1 is an almost primary ideal; this is because for any a and b of R, with , we have , ; thus, either or . However, the converse does not hold in general. Our definition of an almost right primary ideal of a ring with identity is equivalent to the following condition (condition 4 in Theorem 1). For any . If and , then either or , for some . This is clearly different from the definition of an almost primary ideal of a commutative ring mentioned in the introduction.
Proposition 3. Let R be a ring with identity, and P be an ideal of R. Then P is an almost right primary right ideal if and only if P is an almost right primary ideal.
Proof. Let P be an almost right primary right ideal. Then, clearly, P is an almost right primary ideal. Conversely, suppose that , and , for right ideals A and B of R. then , and , for ideals and . Assume that , then , which is a contradiction. Thus, , and by we have either or , for some . □
Proposition 4. Let R be a ring with identity, and P be an ideal of R. Then P is an almost right primary left ideal if and only if P is an almost right primary ideal.
Proof. Similar to the proof of Proposition 3. □
Theorem 1. Let R be a ring with identity, and P be an ideal of R. Then the following statements are equivalent.
- (1)
P is a principally almost nilary ideal.
- (2)
For any . If and , then either or , for some .
- (3)
For any . If and , then either or , for some .
- (4)
For any . If and , then either or , for some .
Recall that when , then the proof also applies to an almost right primary ideal.
Proof. Suppose that and then , ; thus, either or and, hence, either or for some .
Let , such that and , then and , thus by either or for some and, hence, or .
Let , such that , . Then, and , and by we are done.
Let , such that and , then and , hence, by (4), either or , for some . Thus, either or . If then , and by Lemma 1 we obtain for some . If , then for some . □
Proposition 5. Let R be a ring with identity, and let P be an ideal of R, such that is the right primary ideal. Then the ideal P is a principally almost nilary ideal if and only if, for any ideals, A and B of R, with and , it is the case that either or .
Proof. Suppose that P is a principally almost nilary ideal. For any ideals, A or B of R, suppose that and . If then there exists , such that and, thus, for all . For any , . If then either , which is a contradiction, or for some . Thus, for all and, hence, . On the other hand, if , then by assumption we have .
Conversely, suppose that and , then by assumption, either or , thus by Lemma 1, either or for some . □
Remark 2. Observe that in Proposition 5, the mentioned condition always implies that the ideal P is principally almost nilary ideal.
Proposition 6. Let P be an ideal of a ring R.
- (1)
If is a principally right primary (principally nilary) ideal, then P is a principally right primary (principally nilary) ideal and, hence, a principally almost right primary (principally almost nilary) ideal.
- (2)
If , i.e., , and is an almost right primary (almost nilary) ideal, then so is P.
Proof. For any principal ideals, A and B of R, suppose that , then , thus either ( for some ) or for some . Thus, by Lemma 1, either () for some or for some . Hence, P is a principally right primary (principally nilary) ideal.
For any ideals, A and B of R, suppose that and , then and and, thus, either () or for some , and since , then by Lemma 1, either () or for some . □
Theorem 2. Let R be the ring with identity, and P be an ideal of R. Then the following statements are equivalent.
- (1)
P is a principally almost nilary ideal.
- (2)
For all . Either or , and either or .
Proof. Let . For any , we have , thus .
If , then and, hence, , thus . Since , we have .
If , then by (1) either for some , which implies that (a contradiction). Or , which means , hence .
Similar to the previous proof, the validity of the other relationship can be proven.
Suppose that , such that and for all , for some principal ideals, A and B of R, then we prove that . Let . Then, we have , which implies . By either or . If , then by Lemma 1 for some (a contradiction). Therefore, . Consequently, .
Let
. Then,
, and so
. By
, we obtain
, because
. Thus,
, which implies that
. Finally, we have
which completes the proof. □
Theorem 3. Let R be a ring with identity, and P be an almost right primary ideal of R. Then for all , the following holds.
- (1)
Either or .
- (2)
Either or .
Proof. Similar to the proof of the above theorem. □
Theorem 4. Let R be a ring, I be an ideal of R. Let P be an ideal of R, such that . If P is an almost right primary ideal of R then is an almost right primary ideal of .
Proof. Suppose that and for ideals in . Assume that and for some ideals and . Then, and , which implies that and . So, either or , for some . If , then and, hence, . Or . □
Theorem 5. Let R be a ring, and P be an ideal of R. Then P is an almost right primary ideal of R if and only if is a weakly right primary ideal of .
Proof. Suppose that P is an almost right primary ideal. Let be ideals of , such that . Thus, there exist ideals and of R, such that and =. Therefore, , thus . By assumption, we have that either or , for some since . This implies that either or .
For the converse, suppose that
are ideals of
R, such that
and
. Then,
=
,
are ideals of
. Note that,
and
. Thus,
and by assumption, either
or
, for some
. Consequently,
or
. □
Theorem 6. Let I be an almost right primary ideal of a ring R. If is a weakly right primary ideal of , then there exists an almost right primary ideal P of R with , such that .
Proof. It is clear that where P is an ideal of R with . Suppose that , , for any ideals, A and B of R. Obviously, .
If , then either or , for some .
If , then , and since is a weakly right primary ideal, then either or for some ; thus, either or . Hence, P is an almost right primary ideal. □
Theorem 7. Let f: be a ring epimorphism, and P be an almost right primary ideal of R, such that . Then is an almost right primary ideal of S.
Proof. Suppose that and for any ideals of S. Then, the inverse images and of and , respectively, are ideals of R containing the kernel of f. Since f is an epimorphism, then and . Then, we have:
and . Thus, and .
By assumption, either or , for some . If , then , and if , then . □
Corollary 1. Let be a ring epimorphism, and B be an ideal of S, such that is an almost right primary ideal of R. Then, B is an almost right primary ideal of S.
Proof. Since the inverse image of any ideal of S is an ideal of R containing , the proof follows from Theorem 7. □
Theorem 8. Let be a ring epimorphism, and P be an ideal of R, such that . If is an almost right primary ideal of S, then P is an almost right primary ideal of R.
Proof. Suppose that and for any ideals of R. Then, . Assume that , then , which is a contradiction. Hence, . Since is an almost right primary ideal of S, then either or , for some . Thus, either or . □
Corollary 2. Let be a ring epimorphism and B be an almost right primary ideal of S, such that . Then, is an almost right primary ideal of R.
Proof. Let . Then, P is an almost right primary ideal of R by Theorem 8, since and is an almost right primary ideal of S. □
As in Theorems 4, 7, and 8, the almost nilary version can be proven analogously, and we obtain the following theorems.
Theorem 9. Let R be a ring, I be an ideal of R. Let P be an ideal of R, such that . If P is an almost nilary ideal of R, then is an almost nilary ideal of .
Theorem 10. Let f: be a ring epimorphism and P be an almost nilary ideal of R, such that . Then is an almost nilary ideal of S.
Theorem 11. Let be a ring epimorphism, and P be an ideal of R, such that . If is an almost nilary ideal of S, then P is an almost nilary ideal of R.
In the next Theorem, we show the analogy between the right primary and almost right primary.
Theorem 12. Let R be the ring with identity, and P be an ideal of R, such that for any . Then P is the right primary ideal if and only if P is a principally almost right primary ideal.
Proof. Suppose that P is the right primary ideal. Then clearly P is a principally almost right primary ideal.
For the converse implication, assume that the principally almost right primary ideal
P is not the right primary ideal. Then, there exist principal ideals,
A or
B of
R, such that
with
and
, for every
, so by Lemma 1,
. Hence, by assumption, we obtain
. Let
and
Then, for any
, we have:
If
, then
. This implies that
and, thus,
. This contradicts with
. If
, then since
P is a principally almost right primary ideal, we either have
or
, for some
, which implies either
or
, respectively (a contradiction). □
Corollary 3. Let R be the ring and P be an ideal of R, such that . Then P is a weakly right primary ideal if and only if P is an almost right primary ideal.
Proof. If P is a weakly right primary, then P is an almost right primary ideal.
Now suppose that P is an almost right primary ideal. Let A and B be any ideals of R, such that . Then . Thus, we are done. □
The next result is a consequence of Corollary 3.
Corollary 4. Let R be the ring, such that , and let P be an ideal of R. Then P is a weakly right primary ideal if and only if P is an almost right primary ideal.
Proposition 7. Let be a local ring, and let P be an ideal of R, such that . Then P is an almost right primary ideal.
Proof. Let A and B be ideals of R. Then, and . Thus, , which yields that P is an almost right primary ideal. □
3. Decomposable Rings
Definition 2. A ring R is called decomposable if for some nontrivial rings and .
It is well known that if the rings
are with identities, then any ideal of
has the form
, where
I and
J are ideals of
and
, respectively. If
I is an ideal of
, then
, and
, for any ideal
J of
. Theorem 6 in [
11] states that an ideal
of the direct product of commutative rings
R,
S is prime if and only if
has the form
where
P is a prime ideal of
R or
where
Q is a prime ideal of
S. In the following, we show that this theorem is just a special property from a more general case.
Lemma 2. Let R and S be any rings with identities. An ideal of is prime if and only if has the form where P is a prime ideal of R or where Q is a prime ideal of S.
Proof. Suppose that is a prime ideal of where P, Q are ideals of R, S, respectively. Then , then either , which implies or , which implies . The rest of the proof (that the ideal P of () is prime) is straightforward.
Can be easily verified. □
Lemma 3. Let R and S be any rings with identities. Let be an ideal of . Then .
Proof. where for every
(
),
is a prime ideal of
R (
S) containing
I. Thus
Thus, , where each is a prime ideal of containing by Lemma 2. Hence, □
Now we are ready to characterize the forms of almost right primary ideals of decomposable rings. Recall that Lemma 8 (2) of [
11] states that if
Q is a primary ideal of
with
where
R,
S are commutative rings, then either
where
is a primary ideal of
R or
, where
is a primary ideal of
S. However the same characteristic is not quite true of the almost right primary ideals, as we shall see below.
Theorem 13. Let and be any rings, and P be an ideal of . Then the following statements are equivalent.
- (1)
P is a principally almost right primary ideal of .
- (2)
is a principally almost right primary ideal of .
Proof. Let
, and
where
are principal ideals of
, and
are principal ideals of
. Then,
and
. Thus,
and
. Hence, by
either
or
. This implies that either
or
. Hence, either
or
for some
, by Lemma 1.
Let be principal ideals of , such that and . Then and . Thus, by either or , which implies that either or , for some . □
Remark 3. As a modification of Theorem 13, one can easily show that if P is an ideal of , then P is a principally almost right primary ideal of if and only if is a principally almost right primary ideal of .
Corollary 5. Let for the rings . If for some , is a principally almost primary ideal of , then is a principally almost right primary ideal of R.
Theorem 14. Let P be an ideal of , where and are rings with identities. If is a principally almost right primary ideal of R, where I, J are proper ideals of and , respectively. Then P is the idempotent ideal.
Proof. If both
I and
J are idempotent then
P is idempotent. Thus, assume that either ideal
I or
J is not idempotent, without loss of generality, assume that
I is not an idempotent ideal of
. Then, there exists an element
. Thus,
and
. Therefore,
Now assume that .
Thus, , which is a contradiction. Therefore, . On the other hand, . Because the ideal is a principally almost right primary ideal, and , are principal ideals generated by and of , , respectively, we have that either or . Hence, either or , which yields a contradiction. Thus, I must be idempotent; hence, P is an idempotent ideal. □
Theorem 15. Let P be an ideal of , where and are rings with identities. Then P is a principally almost right primary ideal of R if and only if it has one of the following forms.
- (1)
, where I is a principally almost right primary ideal of .
- (2)
, where J is a principally almost right primary ideal of .
- (3)
, where I and J are idempotent ideals of and , respectively.
Proof. We come up with the proof by Theorem 13, Remark 3, Theorem 14, and the fact that every idempotent ideal is an almost right primary ideal. □
Example 2. Let , where S is any ring with identity. Let I and J be any nonzero idempotent ideals of S, such that . The ideal is an almost right primary ideal as a consequence of the fact that P is idempotent. However, by Lemma 2, the ideal is not prime ideal. Moreover, since , and , for all , then P is neither a nilary nor the right primary ideal.
Theorem 16. Let R and S be any rings with identities. Let be an ideal of . If is a principally almost right primary ideal of , then it is an idempotent ideal.
Proof. Suppose that is a principally almost right primary ideal for any ideals I, J, of R, S, respectively. Then by Theorem 15, we have three cases.
- (1)
If where A is a principally almost right primary ideal of R then by Lemma 3 we obtain , which is a contradiction since is proper of the ring S.
- (2)
If , where B is a principally almost right primary ideal of S then by Lemma 3, we obtain (a contradiction).
- (3)
If , where A, B are idempotent ideals of R and S, respectively, then by Lemma 3, we obtain and , which are idempotent ideals and, hence, so is P.
□
Proposition 8. Let and be rings with identities. If every ideal of and is a product of a principally almost right primary ideal, then every ideal of is a product of a principally almost right primary ideal.
Proof. Let I and J be ideals of and , respectively, and and for principally almost right primary ideals and , and let P be an ideal of . Then P must have one of the following three forms by Theorem 15.
- (1)
- (2)
- (3)
Finally, if
, then
In all cases, we obtain a product of principally almost right primary ideals of R due to Theorem 15. □
4. Fully Almost Right Primary Rings
Definition 3. A ring in which every ideal is a principally almost right primary ideal is called a fully (principally) almost right primary ring.
Note that every fully prime ring (fully weakly prime ring, fully idempotent ring, fully almost prime, fully weakly right primary ) is a fully almost right primary ring.
The next result is a consequence of Corollary 3.
Corollary 6. Let R be a ring, such that for every ideal P of R. Then, R is a fully almost right primary ring if and only if R is a fully weakly right primary ring.
Remark 4. Corollary 4 suggests that the assumption of Corollary 6 can be replaced by .
Corollary 7. Every local ring with is a fully almost right primary ring.
Proof. For any ideal P of R, we have that . Thus, P is an almost right primary ideal by Proposition 7. □
Theorem 17. Let R be a ring, and I be an ideal of R. If R is a fully almost right primary ring, so is .
Proof. Suppose is an ideal of . Then, there exists an ideal of R, such that . Clearly, P is an almost right primary ideal of R. Hence, by Theorem 4, is an almost right primary ideal of . □
Theorem 18. Let be a ring epimorphism. If R is a fully almost right primary ring, so is S.
Proof. Let P be an ideal of S. Then is an almost right primary ideal of R. Then, by Theorem 7, is an almost right primary ideal of S. □
Theorem 19. Let be a ring epimorphism, such that , for any ideal I of R. If S is a fully almost right primary ring, so is R.
Proof. Let P be an ideal of R. Then, is an almost right primary ideal of the fully almost right primary ring S. Hence, by Theorem 8, P is an almost right primary ideal of R. □
Remark 5. The nilary version of Theorems 17, 18, and 19, can be obtained by using the Theorems 9, 10, and 11 respectively.
Note that every fully idempotent ring is a fully almost right primary ring. However, the converse does not hold in general. In the following theorem, we show that the equivalence holds in direct product rings.
Theorem 20. Let , where , are rings with identities. Then the following statements are equivalent.
- (1)
R is a fully idempotent ring.
- (2)
R is a fully principally almost right primary ring.
Proof. Clear.
Assume that P is an ideal of R, which is not idempotent. Then by Theorem 15, we have three cases for the form of P.
Case 1.
, where
I is a principally almost right primary ideal of
. Then
I is not an idempotent ideal of
. So there exists an element
, which yields that
and
. Hence,
Thus
and
Since is an almost principally right primary ideal, then either or , for some . This implies that either or , which is a contradiction. So I must be idempotent.
Case 2. where J is a principally almost right primary ideal of . Similar to the proof of case , one can see that J must be idempotent.
Case 3. , where I and J are idempotent ideals of and , respectively. Clearly, P is an idempotent ideal of R. □
Corollary 8. Let and be rings with identities. Then the following statements are equivalent.
- (1)
is a fully principally almost right primary ring.
- (2)
and are fully idempotent rings.
Theorem 21. Let for the rings . If R is a fully principally almost right primary ring, then so is for every .
Proof. Let
be the projective epimorphism, where
for all
. Then,
is a fully principally almost right primary ring for all
, by Theorem 18. □
Remark 6. Theorem 15 shows that the converse of Theorem 21 is not true in general, in other words, the direct product of a fully almost right primary ring does not need to be a fully principally almost right primary ring. The following corollary gives a special case, such that the direct product of a fully principally almost right primary ring is a fully principally almost right primary ring.
Corollary 9. If a ring R is a fully principally almost right primary ring, then so are the rings , where and are any comaximal ideals of R.
Proof. and are fully principally almost right primary rings by Theorem 17. Now, by the epimorphism , defined as , the proof is complete by Theorem 18. □