Next Article in Journal
Stability and Bifurcation Analysis in a Discrete Predator–Prey System of Leslie Type with Radio-Dependent Simplified Holling Type IV Functional Response
Previous Article in Journal
Classical 1-Absorbing Primary Submodules
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Ribbon Elements of the Quantum Double of Generalized Taft–Hopf Algebra

College of Mathematical Science, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225002, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2024, 12(12), 1802; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12121802
Submission received: 15 May 2024 / Revised: 5 June 2024 / Accepted: 7 June 2024 / Published: 10 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research in Pure and Applied Algebra)

Abstract

:
Let s, t be two positive integers and k be an algebraically closed field with char ( k ) s t . We show that the Drinfeld double D ( s t , t * c o p ) of generalized Taft–Hopf algebra s t , t * c o p has ribbon elements if and only if t is odd. Moreover, if s is even and t is odd, then D ( s t , t * c o p ) has two ribbon elements, and if both s and t are odd, then D ( s t , t * c o p ) has only one ribbon element. Finally, we compute explicitly all ribbon elements of D ( s t , t * c o p ) .

1. Introduction

The representation category of a quasi-triangular Hopf algebra is a braided tensor category. The braiding structure of a quasi-triangular Hopf algebra can supply a solution to the Yang–Baxter equation. Recently, great progress has been made in the research of the quasi-triangular Hopf algebra. Drinfeld [1] constructed a quasi-triangular Hopf algebra from a finite-dimensional Hopf algebra, i.e., the quantum double (or Drinfeld double) of a Hopf algebra. Ribbon Hopf algebra is a quasi-triangular Hopf algebra with a ribbon element. The finite-dimensional ribbon Hopf algebra plays an important role in constructing invariants of three-manifolds [2]. Thus, researchers have paid much attention to the question of when a quasi-triangular Hopf algebra has ribbon structures. In [3], Chen and Yang gave a necessary and sufficient condition for the Drinfeld double of a finite-dimensional Hopf superalgebra to have a ribbon element. Kauffman and Radford [4] gave a necessary and sufficient condition for the Drinfeld double of a finite-dimensional Hopf algebra to admit a ribbon structure, and they proved that ( D ( A n ( q ) ) , R ) is a ribbon Hopf algebra if and only if n is odd, where D ( A n ( q ) ) is the Drinfeld double of n 2 -dimensional Taft algebra A n ( q ) and R is the universal R -matrix of D ( A n ( q ) ) . In [5], Benkart and Biswal computed the ribbon element of ( D ( A n ( q ) ) , R ) explicitly when n is odd. In [6], Andruskiewitsch and Schneider constructed u ( D , 0 , 0 ) , which is a pointed Hopf algebra of the nilpotent type. In particular, if D = ( G , g s , χ , μ ) , u ( D , 0 , 0 ) is the generalized Taft–Hopf algebra denoted by s t , t * c o p . Burciu [7] provided a sufficient condition for the quantum double of u ( D , 0 , 0 ) to be a ribbon Hopf algebra. If χ ( g s ) = t is an odd that is coprime to three, then D ( s t , t * c o p ) is a ribbon Hopf algebra. Leduc and Ram [8] showed how the ribbon Hopf algebra structure on the Drinfeld–Jimbo quantum groups of types A, B, C, and D can be used to derive formulas giving explicit realizations of the irreducible representations of the Iwahori–Hecke algebras of type A and the Birman–Wenzl algebras. Centrone and Yasumura [9] extended the action of the n-th Taft–Hopf algebra H on A = k [ u ] with u n = β to the Drinfeld double D ( H ) . This is used to show that, for each H-action on A, there is a unique left H-comodule algebra structure on A such that A is a Yetter–Drinfeld algebra over H. Montgomery and Schneider [10] characterized the action of a Taft algebra H n on finite-dimensional algebras A that satisfy that every skew derivation is inner. Farsad [11] proved that the Drinfeld double D ( K n ) of Nichols–Hopf algebra K n is a ribbon Hopf algebra when n is even. Chang [12] provided the explicit expression of the ribbon elements of D ( K n ) .
In this paper, we give a sufficient and necessary condition for the Drinfeld double D ( s t , t * c o p ) of generalized Taft–Hopf algebra s t , t * c o p to have a ribbon structure. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we recall some definitions and notions and the structures of generalized Taft–Hopf algebra s t , t * c o p . In Section 3, we describe the Hopf algebra structure of ( s t , t * c o p ) * . In Section 4, we show that ( D ( s t , t * c o p ) , R ) have ribbon elements if and only if t is odd. Finally, we compute all ribbon elements of ( D ( s t , t * c o p ) , R ) .

2. Preliminaries

Throughout, we work over an algebraically closed field k with char ( k ) s t . Unless otherwise stated, all algebras and Hopf algebras are defined over k ; d i m and ⊗ denote d i m k and k , respectively. References [13,14,15] are basic references for the theory of Hopf algebras and quantum groups.
Let 0 q k . For any non-negative integer n, define ( n ) q by ( 0 ) q = 0 and ( n ) q = 1 + q + + q n 1 for n > 0 . Observe that ( n ) q = n when q = 1 and
( n ) q = q n 1 q 1
when q 1 . Define the q-factorial of n by
( n ) ! q = ( q n 1 ) ( q n 1 1 ) ( q 1 ) ( q 1 ) n
when n > 0 and q 1 . The q-binomial coefficients n i q are defined inductively as follows for 0 i n :
n 0 q = 1 = n n q , f o r n 0 ,
n i q = q i n 1 i q + n 1 i 1 q , f o r 0 < i < n .
It is well-known that n i q is a polynomial in q with integer coefficients and with the value at q = 1 equal to the usual binomial coefficient n i and that
n i q = ( n ) ! q ( i ) ! q ( n i ) ! q
when ( n 1 ) ! q 0 and 0 < i < n .
Next, we use the sigma notation: for x H , H being a coalgebra,
Δ ( x ) = x 1 x 2 .
Suppose that H is a bialgebra over k . The left and right H-module actions defined on H * by
< a p , b > = < p , b a > = < p b , a > ,
respectively, for a , b H and p H * give H * an A-bimodule structure. Likewise, the left and right H * -modules actions on H by
p a = a 1 < p , a 2 > , a p = < p , a 1 > a 2 ,
respectively, for p H * and a H give H a H * -bimodule structure.

2.1. Generalized Taft–Hopf Algebra

In this subsection, we recall the structure of generalized Taft–Hopf algebra s t , t * c o p .
Let s 2 , t 1 , and let p k be a primitive t-th root of unity. The generalized Taft–Hopf algebra s t , t * c o p is generated as an algebra by g and x subject to the following relations:
g s t = 1 , x t = 0 , x g = p g x .
The comultiplication Δ , counit ε , and antipode S are given, respectively, by
Δ ( x ) = x g + 1 x , ε ( x ) = 0 , S ( x ) = x g 1 ,
Δ ( g ) = g g , ε ( g ) = 1 , S ( g ) = g 1 = g s t 1 .
Note that dim ( s t , t * c o p ) = s t 2 , and s t , t * c o p has a k -basis { g i x j | 0 i s t 1 , 0 j t 1 } . In case s = 1 , then s t , t * c o p = t , t * c o p is the t 2 -dimensional Taft–Hopf algebra. For this reason, s t , t * c o p is called a generalized Taft algebra. For details, one can refer to [16]. In the following, we denote s t , t * c o p by T .

2.2. Ribbon Hopf Algebra

In this subsection, we recall the definition of the quasi-triangular Hopf algebra and ribbon Hopf algebra [5] (Section 3.1).
Definition 1. 
Let H be a Hopf algebra. If there exists an invertible element R H H , such that
R Δ ( x ) = Δ o p ( x ) R , f o r a l l x H , ( Δ i d ) R = R 13 R 23 , ( i d Δ ) R = R 13 R 12 ,
then H is called a quasi-triangular Hopf algebra. Here, Δ o p ( x ) has the tensor factors in Δ ( x ) interchanged, and R = i x i y i , R 12 = i x i y i 1 , R 13 = i x i 1 y i , R 23 = i 1 x i y i . Let R o p = i y i x i . For instance, both Radford–Hopf algebra and generalized Taft algebra are a quasi-triangular Hopf algebra.
We assume R = i x i y i as above and use the antipode S to define
u = i S ( y i ) x i H .
Then, the following expressions hold
u x u 1 = S 2 ( x ) f o r a l l x H a n d Δ ( u ) = ( R o p R ) 1 ( u u ) .
Definition 2. 
Let H be a quasi-triangular Hopf algebra. If there exists an invertible element v (the ribbon element) in the center of H such that
v 2 = u S ( u ) , S ( v ) = v , ε ( v ) = 1 , Δ ( v ) = ( R o p R ) 1 ( v v ) ,
where u is as in (1), then ( H , R , v ) is called a ribbon Hopf algebra. For example, a t 2 -dimensional Taft–Hopf algebra is a ribbon Hopf algebra (see [4]).

3. The Structure of T *

In this section, we describe the Hopf algebra structure of T * .
Let { g i x j ¯ | 0 i s t 1 , 0 j t 1 } be the basis of Hopf algebra T * such that g i x j ¯ ( g i x j ) = 1 and g i x j ¯ ( g i x j ) = 0 for ( i , j ) ( i , j ) , 0 i , i s t 1 , 0 j , j t 1 .
Lemma 1. 
Let 0 i , k s t 1 and 0 j , l t 1 . Then,
g i x j ¯ g k x l ¯ = 0 , if k i + j ( mod s t ) or l + j t , l + j j p g i x j + l ¯ , otherwise .
Proof. 
By the coalgebra structure of T , we have Δ ( g a x b ) = ( g a g a ) ( x g + 1 x ) b = u = 0 b b u p g a x b u g a + b u x u , where 0 a s t 1 , 0 b t 1 . If 0 i , k s t 1 , 0 j , l t 1 , then ( g i x j ¯ g k x l ¯ ) ( g a x b ) = u = 0 b b u p g i x j ¯ ( g a x b u ) g k x l ¯ ( g a + b u x u ) . Hence, ( g i x j ¯ g k x l ¯ ) ( g a x b ) 0 if and only if a = i , b = l + j , j + l < t a n d k i + j ( m o d s t ) . Obviously, ( g i x j ¯ g k x l ¯ ) ( g a x b ) = l + j j p .
Obviously, i = 0 s t 1 g i ¯ = ε is the identity of the algebra T * .
Let ω k be a primitive s t -th root of unity with ω s = p . Put α = i = 0 s t 1 ω i g i ¯ and β = i = 0 s t 1 g i x ¯ .
Lemma 2. 
T * is generated as an algebra by α and β.
Proof. 
Obviously, α , β T * . Let A be a subalgebra of T * generated by α and β . It follows from Lemma 1 that β j = ( j ) ! p ( x j ¯ + g x j ¯ + + g s t 1 x j ¯ ) , 1 j t 1 , and
α = 1 ¯ + ω g ¯ + ω 2 g 2 ¯ + + ω s t 1 g s t 1 ¯ , α 2 = 1 ¯ + ω 2 g ¯ + ω 4 g 2 ¯ + + ω 2 ( s t 1 ) g s t 1 ¯ , α s t 1 = 1 ¯ + ω s t 1 g ¯ + ω 2 ( s t 1 ) g 2 ¯ + + ω ( s t 1 ) ( s t 1 ) g s t 1 ¯ .
Then, we have
1 ( j ) ! p α β j = x j ¯ + ω g x j ¯ + ω 2 g 2 x j ¯ + + ω s t 1 g s t 1 x j ¯ , 1 ( j ) ! p α 2 β j = x j ¯ + ω 2 g x j ¯ + ω 4 g 2 x j ¯ + + ω 2 ( s t 1 ) g 2 ( s t 1 ) x j ¯ , 1 ( j ) ! p α s t 1 β j = x j ¯ + ω s t 1 g x j ¯ + ω 2 ( s t 1 ) g 2 x j ¯ + + ω ( s t 1 ) ( s t 1 ) g s t 1 x j ¯ , 1 ( j ) ! p α s t β j = x j ¯ + g x j ¯ + g 2 x j ¯ + + g s t 1 x j ¯ .
The coefficient determinant of (3) is | B | =   1 ω ω 2 ω s t 1 1 ω 2 ω 4 ω 2 ( s t 1 ) 1 ω s t 1 ω 2 ( s t 1 ) ω ( s t 1 ) ( s t 1 )   = 0 i < j s t 1 ( ω i ω j ) 0 .
Therefore, by Cramer’s Rule, we have g ¯ A . Similarly, one can prove that g i x j ¯ A for 0 i s t 1 , 0 j t 1 .
Proposition 1. 
In T * , we have
α s t = ε , β t = 0 , β α = ω α β .
Proof. 
It follows from Lemma 1 that α s t = 1 ¯ + g ¯ + g 2 ¯ + + g s t 1 ¯ = ε , β t = ( t ) ! p ( x t ¯ + g x t ¯ + + g s t 1 x t ¯ ) = 0 , and β α = ( j ) ! p ( ω x ¯ + ω 2 g x ¯ + + ω s t g s t 1 x ¯ ) = ω α β . This completes the proof. □
Proposition 2. 
The comultiplication, the counit, and the antipode of T * c o p are given by
Δ ( α ) = α α ,
Δ ( β ) = β 1 + α s β ,
ε ( α ) = 1 , ε ( β ) = 0 ,
S ( α ) = α s t 1 , S ( β ) = α s β .
Proof. 
We only consider the formula of Δ ( α ) since the proof for Δ ( β ) is similar. Suppose that Δ ( g t ¯ ) = j = 0 s t 1 k = 0 t 1 θ j , k , j , k g j x k ¯ g j x k ¯ , where θ j , k , j , k = g t ¯ ( g j x k g j x k ) . One can prove that θ j , k , j , k = 1 if an only if j + j t ( m o d s t ) , k = k = 0 . Consequently, in T * c o p , we have Δ ( g t ¯ ) = i + j t ( m o d s t ) g i ¯ g j ¯ , then we have Δ ( α ) = α α . Similarly, one can show the formulas of the counit ε and antipode S of T * c o p . □
Definition 3 ([13] (Definition IX.4.1)). 
The quantum double D ( T ) of Hopf algebra T is the bicrossed product of T and of T * c o p .
D ( T ) = T * c o p T .
By Proposition 3 and Lemma 2, one knows that D ( T ) is generated as an algebra by ε g , ε x , α 1 , and β 1 .
Lemma 3 ([13] (Lemma IX.4.2)).  
The multiplication, comultiplication, and counit in D ( T ) are given by
( f a ) ( g b ) = ( a ) f ( a 1 g s 1 ( a 3 ) ) a 2 b ,
ε ( f a ) = ε ( a ) f ( 1 ) ,
Δ ( f a ) = ( a ) ( f ) ( f 1 a 1 ) ( f 2 a 2 ) ,
S ( f a ) = ( S ( a 2 ) S ( f 1 ) ) ( f 2 S ( a 1 ) ) = ( S ( f 2 ) a 1 ) ( S ( a 2 ) S ( f 1 ) ) ,
where f , g T * c o p and a , b T , f 1 ( x ) f 2 ( y ) = f ( y x ) for all x , y T .

4. The Ribbon Elements of ( D ( T ) , R )

In this section, we recall some results about quasi-triangular Hopf algebras, and then, we investigate the ribbon elements of ( D ( T ) , R ) .

4.1. Universal R-Matrix of D ( T )

In this subsection, we determine the universal R-matrix of D ( T ) .
By [13] (Lemma IX.4.2), the universal R -matrix of the quantum double has an explicit formula:
R = i I ( 1 e i ) ( e i 1 ) ,
where { e i } i I is a basis of the vector space H and { e i } i I is its dual basis in ( H o p ) * = ( H * ) c o p .
Lemma 4. 
For any 0 i s t 1 , 0 j t 1 , set
y i , j = 1 s t 1 ( j ) ! p k = 0 s t 1 ω i k α k β j
in T * . Then, y i , j ( g i 1 x j 1 ) = δ i , i 1 δ j , j 1 for all any 0 i , i 1 s t 1 , 0 j , j 1 t 1 .
Proof. 
For 0 i s t 1 , 0 j t 1 , let δ i , j be the Kronecker symbol, then we have
y i , j ( g i 1 x j 1 ) = 1 s t 1 ( j ) ! p ( k = 0 s t 1 ω i k α k β j ) ( g i 1 x j 1 ) = 1 s t 1 ( j ) ! p ( j ) ! p ( β j + ω 1 α β j + + ω ( s t 1 ) i α s t 1 β j ) ( g i 1 x j 1 ) = 1 s t ( v = 0 s t 1 g v x j ¯ + ω i v = 0 s t 1 ω v g v x j ¯ + + ω ( s t 1 ) i v = 0 s t 1 ω ( s t 1 ) v g v x j ¯ ) ( g i 1 x j 1 ) = 1 s t ( 1 + ω ( i 1 i ) + + ω ( i 1 i ) ( s t 1 ) ) δ j , j 1 = δ i , i 1 δ j , j 1 .
By Lemma 4, one can easily know that the R -matrix of D ( T ) is
R = i , j ( 1 g i x j ) ( y i , j 1 ) = 1 s t i , j , k 1 ( j ) ! p ω i k ( 1 g i x j ) ( α k β j 1 ) .

4.2. The Existence of Ribbon Elements

In this subsection, we review some facts about the integral and quasi-ribbon element for a finite-dimensional Hopf algebra H. For h H and α in the dual space H * , we define
α , h : = α ( h ) k .
The following results on the integral can be found in [14] (Chapter 2):
  • A left integral element in H is an element t in H such that h t = ε ( h ) t , h H . A right integral element in H is an element t in H such that t h = ε ( h ) t , h H .
H l denotes the subspace of left integrals in H, and H r denotes the subspace of right integrals in H. H is called unimodular if H l = H r .
  • Let H be a finite-dimensional Hopf algebra. Then, we have the following:
    (1)
    H l and H r are each one-dimensional.
    (2)
    The antipode S of H is bijective, and S ( H l ) = H r , S ( H r ) = H l .
  • Suppose t H l and T H * r . Notice that the left integrals for H form a one-dimensional ideal of H. Hence, there is a unique α ˜ G ( H * ) such that t h = α ˜ , h t for all h H . The condition that H is unimodular is equivalent to α ˜ = ε .
Likewise, there is a unique g ˜ H such that q T = q , g ˜ T , for all q H * . We call α ˜ and g ˜ the distinguished group-like elements of H * and H, respectively.
As above, assume the R-matrix is R = i x i y i , and define
g α ˜ = i x i α ˜ ( y i ) , a n d h α ˜ = g α ˜ g ˜ 1 ,
where α ˜ is the distinguished group-like element of H * and g ˜ is the distinguished group-like element of H.
A quasi-ribbon element of Hopf algebra H is an element satisfying all the ribbon conditions in (2), except for the requirement that it is central. Our approach to finding an explicit formula for the ribbon element of D ( T ) is to use the following results from quasi-ribbon elements.
Theorem 1 ([4] (Theorem 1)). 
Let ( H , R ) be a finite-dimensional quasi-triangular Hopf algebra over a field k . Suppose h α ˜ is any element of H such that ( h α ˜ ) 2 = h α ˜ , i.e., h α ˜ is any square root of the element h α ˜ in (4). Then, v = u h α ˜ is a quasi-ribbon element, where u is as in (1). Moreover, v = u h α ˜ is a ribbon element of ( H , R ) if and only if S 2 ( a ) = ( h α ˜ ) 1 a h α ˜ for all a H .
Theorem 2 ([4] (Theorem 3)). 
Suppose that H is a finite-dimensional Hopf algebra with antipode S over a field k . Let g ˜ and α ˜ be the distinguished group-like elements of H and H * , respectively. Then, we have the following:
(1) 
( D ( H ) , R ) has a quasi-ribbon element if and only if there are h G ( H ) and γ G ( H * ) such that h 2 = g ˜ and γ 2 = α ˜ .
(2) 
( D ( H ) , R ) has a ribbon element if and only if there are h G ( H ) and γ G ( H * ) as in part (1) such that
S 2 ( y ) = h ( γ y γ 1 ) h 1
for all y H .
Corollary 1 ([4] (Proposition 3)). 
Let S be the antipode of D ( H ) , and set U = S ( y i ) x i . Then,
( γ , h ) U ( γ 1 h 1 )
defines a one-to-one correspondence between those pairs ( γ , h ) G ( H * ) × G ( H ) such that h 2 = g ˜ and γ 2 = α ˜ and the quasi-ribbon elements of ( D ( H ) , R ) . The ribbon elements correspond to those pairs ( γ , h ) , which further satisfy S 2 ( y ) = h ( γ y γ 1 ) h 1 , for all y H .
By [17], D ( T ) is unimodular, so that α D = ε D , where α D and ε D are the distinguished group-like element and the counit of ( D ( T ) ) * , respectively.
Lemma 5. 
(1) 
i = 0 s t 1 ω ( t 1 ) i α i β t 1 is a right integral in T * , and the distinguished group-like element of T is g 1 t .
(2) 
i = 0 s t 1 g i x t 1 is a left integral in T , and the distinguished group-like element of T * is α s .
Proof. 
Let λ = 0 i s t 1 0 j t 1 a i j α i β j . We use the definition of a right integral of T * :
λ T * r λ h * = ε ( h * ) λ ,
for all h * T * . Let h * = β ; we have
0 i s t 1 0 j t 1 a i j α i β j + 1 = 0 .
Since { α i β k | 0 i s t 1 , 0 j t 1 } is the basis of T * , and β t = 0 , we obtain
λ = i = 0 s t 1 a i , t 1 α i β t 1 .
Let h * = α . We have
i = 0 s t 1 a i , t 1 ω t 1 α i + 1 β t 1 = i = 0 s t 1 a i , t 1 α i β t 1 ,
Then, a i , t 1 ω t 1 = a i + 1 , t 1 . Moreover, T * r is one-dimensional. Therefore, λ = i = 0 s t 1 ω ( t 1 ) i α i β t 1 .
Let g ˜ = 0 k s t 1 0 l t 1 b k l g k x l be the distinguished group-like element of T . Then, we have
h * λ = h * ( g ˜ ) λ .
Let h * = α j . We have
0 i s t 1 0 j t 1 ω ( t 1 ) i α i + j β t 1 = 0 i s t 1 0 j t 1 ω i j g i ¯ , 0 k s t 1 0 l t 1 b k l g k x l i = 0 s t 1 ω ( t 1 ) i α i β t 1 .
Thus, k = 0 s t 1 ω k j b k 0 = ω ( 1 t ) j , 0 j s t 1 . By Cramer’s Rule and the Vandermonde determinant, we have
b k 0 = 1 , k = s t + 1 t , 0 , otherwise . , w h e r e 0 k s t 1 .
Let h * = α j β z , 0 j s t 1 , 1 z t 1 . We have
( z ) ! p k = 0 s t 1 ω j k g k x z ¯ , 0 k s t 1 0 l t 1 b k l g k x l i = 0 s t 1 ω ( t 1 ) i α i β t 1 = 0 .
Since { α i β k | 0 i s t 1 , 0 j t 1 } is the basis of T * , we have
( z ) ! p k = 0 s t 1 ω j k g k x z ¯ , 0 k s t 1 0 l t 1 b k l g k x l = ( z ) ! p k = 0 s t 1 ω j k b k z = 0 .
By Cramer’s Rule and the Vandermonde determinant, we have
b k l = 0 , 0 k s t 1 , 1 l t 1 .
Consequently, g ˜ = g 1 t . Similarly, we can prove part (2). □
Theorem 3. 
(1) 
( D ( T ) , R ) has quasi-ribbon elements if and only if t is odd.
(2) 
( D ( T ) , R ) has unique ribbon element if and only if both s and t are odd.
(3) 
( D ( T ) , R ) has two ribbon elements if and only if s is even and t is odd.
Proof. 
(1)
By part (1) of Theorem 2, ( D ( T ) , R ) has a quasi-ribbon element if and only if there exist h = g j G ( T ) , γ = α k G ( T * ) , w h e r e j , k Z , such that ( g j ) 2 = g 1 t , α 2 k = α s , which implies s t ( 2 j + t 1 ) and s t ( 2 k + s ) . Since, when t is even, 2 j + t 1 is odd, s t is even, which contradicts s t ( 2 j + t 1 ) . However, when t is odd, no matter whether s is even or odd, there exist j = 2 s t + 1 t 2 , k = s t s 2 Z such that s t ( 2 j + t 1 ) , s t ( 2 k + s ) . Thus, one knows that ( D ( T ) , R ) has quasi-ribbon elements if and only if t is odd.
(2)
By part (2) of Theorem 2, ( D ( T ) , R ) has ribbon elements if and only if there exist γ = α k G ( T * ) , h = g j G ( T ) , which satisfy
h 2 = g 1 t , γ 2 = α s , S 2 ( x ) = h ( γ x γ 1 ) h 1 , S 2 ( g ) = h ( γ g γ 1 ) h 1 ,
where x and g are the generators of T , k , j Z and γ , h are given in part ( 1 ) .
It follows S 2 ( x ) = ω s x , h ( γ x γ 1 ) h 1 = g j ( ω k x ) g j = ω k s j x , S 2 ( g ) = g , h ( γ g γ 1 ) h 1 = g j g g j = g that ( D ( T ) , R ) has ribbon elements if and only if there exist pairs ( γ , h ) = ( α k , g j ) such that
g 2 j = g 1 t , α 2 k = α s , ω s x = ω k s j x .
Since the order of α is s t and the order of g is s t , ( D ( T ) , R ) has ribbon elements if and only if there exist pairs ( γ , h ) = ( α k , g j ) such that
s t ( 2 j + t 1 ) , s t ( 2 k + s ) , s t ( k s s j ) .
j = s t u + 1 t 2 Z , k = s t v s 2 Z , v s u = 2 w 1 ,
where u , v , w Z .
By part ( 1 ) , one knows that, if ( D ( T ) , R ) has ribbon elements, then t must be odd. If v is odd, then α k = α s t v s 2 = α s ( t 1 ) 2 ; if v is even, α k = α s t v s 2 , k = s t v s 2 Z , which implies that s must be even. If u is odd, j = s t u + 1 t 2 Z , which implies s must be even, then we have g j = g s t u + 1 t 2 = g s t + 1 t 2 ; if u is even, then g j = g s t u + 1 t 2 = g 1 t 2 . If both t and s are odd, u is even, v is odd or u is odd, and v is even since v s u = 2 w 1 . Moreover, j = s t u + 1 t 2 Z and k = s t v s 2 Z imply that u is even and v is odd, then there exists a unique pair ( γ , h ) = ( α s ( t 1 ) 2 , g 1 t 2 ) satisfying (5). If t is odd and s is even, v must be odd since v s u = 2 w 1 . In this case, no matter whether p is odd or even, j = s t u + 1 t 2 Z and k = s t v s 2 Z . Thus, there exist two pairs ( γ 1 , h 1 ) = ( α s ( t 1 ) 2 , g 1 t 2 ) and ( γ 2 , h 2 ) = ( α s ( t 1 ) 2 , g ( s 1 ) t + 1 2 ) satisfying (5). Consequently, by Corollary 1, ( D ( T ) , R ) has a unique ribbon element if and only if both s and t are odd; ( D ( T ) , R ) has two ribbon elements if and only if s is even and t is odd. □

4.3. Computation of the Ribbon Elements of D ( T )

Throughout this subsection, assume t is an odd integer. Notice that α ˜ = α s and g ˜ = g 1 t are the distinguished group-like elements in T * and T , respectively. By the description about the distinguished group-like element of the Drinfeld double of a finite-dimensional quasi-triangular Hopf algebra in [17], the distinguished group-like element in D ( T ) is α ˜ g ˜ .
Recall the universal R-matrix of D ( T ) given in Section 4.1:
R = 1 s t i , j , k 1 ( j ) ! p ω i k ( 1 g i x j ) ( α k β j 1 ) .
Theorem 4. 
Assume that t is an odd integer:
(1) 
When s is odd, the unique ribbon element in D ( T ) is
v = u ( α s ( t + 1 ) 2 g t 1 2 ) ,
w h e r e u = 1 s t 0 i , k s t 1 0 j t 1 ( 1 ) j 1 ( j ) ! p ω ( i + j ) k j ( j 1 ) s 2 ( α s j k β j g i x j ) .
(2) 
When s is even, the ribbon elements in D ( T ) are
v 1 = u ( α s ( t + 1 ) 2 g t 1 2 ) , v 2 = u ( α s ( t + 1 ) 2 g t ( s + 1 ) 1 2 ) ,
w h e r e u = 1 s t 0 i , k s t 1 0 j t 1 ( 1 ) j 1 ( j ) ! p ω ( i + j ) k j ( j 1 ) s 2 ( α s j k β j g i x j ) .
Proof. 
(1)
We adopt the previous conventions and set g α D = g ε D (which holds as D ( T ) is unimodular). By (4) and (7), we have
g ε D = 1 s t 0 i , k s t 1 0 j t 1 1 ( j ) ! p ω i k ε ( α k β j 1 ) ( 1 g i x j ) = 1 s t 0 i , k s t 1 0 j t 1 1 ( j ) ! p ω i k ε ( 1 ) α k β j ( 1 ) ( 1 g i x j ) .
Since β j ( 1 ) = 0 when j 0 and ε D is an algebra homomorphism, only the terms with j = 0 survive, and therefore,
g ε D = 1 s t 0 i , k s t 1 0 j t 1 ω i k ( 1 g i ) = 1 s t i = 0 s t 1 ( k = 0 s t 1 ω i k ) ( 1 g i ) .
Observe that
k = 0 s t 1 ω i k = 1 ( ω i ) s t 1 ω i = 0
unless i = 0 , in which case k = 0 s t 1 ω i k = s t . Therefore, g ε D = 1 D ( E ) .
By the discussion above, the distinguished group-like element in D ( T ) T * T is g ^ = α s g 1 t .
By (4), h ε D = g ε D ( g ^ ) 1 = ( α s g 1 t ) 1 = α s g t 1 . When s and t are both odd, the square root h ε D of h ε D is unique, because h ε D , and therefore, h ε D has odd order. Thus,
h ε D = α s ( t + 1 ) 2 g t 1 2 ,
v = u h ε D = u ( α s ( t + 1 ) 2 g t 1 2 ) .
By Theorem 1, the quasi-ribbon element v is the unique ribbon element of D ( T ) .
(2)
When s is even and t is odd, h ε D has four square roots:
h ε D 1 = α s ( t + 1 ) 2 g t 1 2 , h ε D 2 = α s 2 g t 1 2 ,
h ε D 3 = α s ( t + 1 ) 2 g t ( s + 1 ) 1 2 , h ε D 4 = α s 2 g t ( s + 1 ) 1 2 .
By Theorem 1,
S 2 ( ε g ) = ( h ε D i ) 1 ( ε g ) h ε D i , S 2 ( ε x ) = ( h ε D i ) 1 ( ε x ) h ε D i ,
S 2 ( α 1 ) = ( h ε D i ) 1 ( α 1 ) h ε D i , S 2 ( β 1 ) = ( h ε D i ) 1 ( β 1 ) h ε D i ,
where i = 1 , 3 and ε g , ε x , α 1 , β 1 are the generators of D ( T ) .
Therefore, quasi-ribbon elements
v 1 = u h ε D 1 = u ( α s ( t + 1 ) 2 g t 1 2 ) a n d v 2 = u h ε D 3 = u ( α s ( t + 1 ) 2 g t ( s + 1 ) 1 2 )
are the ribbon elements of D ( T ) .
It remains to show that u has the expression in (1). Recall that u = i S ( y i ) x i , where
R = 1 s t i , j , k 1 ( j ) ! p ω i k ( 1 g i x j ) ( α k β j 1 ) .
Therefore,
u = 1 s t 0 i , k s t 1 0 j t 1 1 ( j ) ! p ω i k S ( α k β j 1 ) ( 1 g i x j ) = 1 s t 0 i , k s t 1 0 j t 1 1 ( j ) ! p ω i k ( ( α s β ) j ( α s t 1 ) k ) 1 ) ( 1 g i x j ) = 1 s t 0 i , k s t 1 0 j t 1 ( 1 ) j 1 ( j ) ! p ω i k j k j ( j 1 ) s 2 ( α s j k β j 1 ) ( 1 g i x j ) = 1 s t 0 i , k s t 1 0 j t 1 ( 1 ) j 1 ( j ) ! p ω ( i + j ) k j ( j 1 ) s 2 ( α s j k β j g i x j ) .
Finally, we know that, when s is odd, v = u ( α s ( t + 1 ) 2 g t 1 2 ) is the unique ribbon element of D ( T ) . When s is even, v 1 = u ( α s ( t + 1 ) 2 g t 1 2 ) a n d v 2 = u ( α s ( t + 1 ) 2 g t ( s + 1 ) 1 2 ) are the ribbon elements of D ( T ) . □
Remark 1. 
The generalized Taft algebra is a special rank-one pointed Hopf algebra of the nilpotent type. We have provided a necessary and sufficient condition for the quantum double of generalized Taft algebra s t , t * c o p to be a ribbon Hopf algebra. Besides, we computed all ribbon elements of D ( s t , t * c o p ) . Further research is required to obtain the necessary and sufficient condition for the quantum double of all pointed Hopf algebras of the nilpotent type.

Author Contributions

Funding acquisition, J.H.; methodology, H.S.; supervision, Z.J. and M.H.; visualization, J.H.; writing—original draft, Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, H.S. and Y.Z. All authors will be informed about each step of manuscript processing including submission, revision, revision reminder, etc., via emails from our system or assigned Assistant Editor. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20210783).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Drinfeld, V.G. Quantum groups. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Berkeley, CA, USA, 3–11 August 1986; pp. 798–820. [Google Scholar]
  2. Reshetikhin, N.; Turaev, V.G. Inviriants of 3-manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups. Invent. Math. 1991, 103, 547–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chen, J.L.; Yang, S.L. Ribbon Hopf Superalgebras and Drinfel’d Double. Chin. Ann. Math. Ser. B 2018, 39, 1047–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kuaffman, L.H.; Radford, D.E. A necessary and sufficient condition for a finite-dimensional Drinfel’d double to be a ribbon Hopf algebra. J. Algebra 1993, 159, 98–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Benkart, G.; Biswal, R.; Kirkman, E.; Nguyen, V.C.; Zhu, J. Tensor Representations for the Drinfeld Double of the Taft Algebra. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2012.15277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Andruskiewitsch, N.; Schneider, H.J. On the classification of finite-dimensional pointed Hopf algebras. Ann. Math. 2010, 171, 375–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Burciu, S. A class of Drinfeld doubles that are ribbon algebras. J. Algebra 2008, 320, 2053–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Leduc, R.; Ram, A. A ribbon Hopf algebra approach to the irreducible representations of centralizer algebras: The Brauer, Birman-Wenzl, and type A Iwahori-Hecke algebras. J. Algebra 1993, 159, 98–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Centrone, L.; Yasumura, F. Actions of Taft’s algebras on finite dimensional algebras. J. Algebra 2020, 560, 725–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Montgomery, S.; Schneider, H.-J. Skew derivations of finite-dimensional algebras and actions of the double of the Taft–Hopf algebra. Tsukuba J. Math. 2001, 25, 337–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Farsad, V.; Gainutdinov, A.M.; Runkel, I. The symplectic fermion ribbon quasi-Hopf algebra and the SL(2,Z)-action on its centre. Adv. Math. 2022, 400, 108247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chang, L.; Wang, Z.H.; Zhang, Q. Modular data of non-semisimple modular categories. arXiv 2024, arXiv:240409314. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kassel, C. Quantum Groups; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  14. Montgomery, S. Hopf Algebras and Their Actions on Rings; CBMS Series in Math; American Mathematical Soc.: Providence, RI, USA, 1993; Volume 82. [Google Scholar]
  15. Erdmann, K.; Green, E.L.; Snashall, N.; Taillefer, R. Representation theory of the drinfeld doubles of a family of hopf algebras. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 2006, 204, 413–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sweedler, M.E. Hopf Algebras; Benjamin: New York, NY, USA, 1969. [Google Scholar]
  17. Radford, D.E. Minimal quasitriangular Hopf algebras. J. Algebra 1993, 157, 285–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, H.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Huang, M.; Hu, J. The Ribbon Elements of the Quantum Double of Generalized Taft–Hopf Algebra. Mathematics 2024, 12, 1802. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12121802

AMA Style

Sun H, Zhang Y, Jiang Z, Huang M, Hu J. The Ribbon Elements of the Quantum Double of Generalized Taft–Hopf Algebra. Mathematics. 2024; 12(12):1802. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12121802

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Hua, Yuyan Zhang, Ziliang Jiang, Mingyu Huang, and Jiawei Hu. 2024. "The Ribbon Elements of the Quantum Double of Generalized Taft–Hopf Algebra" Mathematics 12, no. 12: 1802. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12121802

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop