Next Article in Journal
New Random Walk Algorithm Based on Different Seed Nodes for Community Detection
Previous Article in Journal
A Predator–Prey System with a Modified Leslie–Gower and Prey Stage Structure Scheme in Deterministic and Stochastic Environments
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Linear Composition Operator on the Bloch Space

1
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Zhongshan Institute, Zhongshan 528402, China
2
School of Mathematical Sciences, Qufu Normal University, Qufu 273100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2024, 12(15), 2373; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12152373 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 11 July 2024 / Revised: 24 July 2024 / Accepted: 25 July 2024 / Published: 30 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Mathematics and Computer Science)

Abstract

:
Let n N 0 , ψ be an analytic self-map on D and u be an analytic function on D . The single operator D u , ψ n acting on various spaces of analytic functions has been a subject of investigation for many years. It is defined as ( D u , ψ n f ) ( z ) = u ( z ) f ( n ) ( ψ ( z ) ) , f H ( D ) . However, the study of the operator P u , ψ k , which represents a finite sum of these operators with varying orders, remains incomplete. The boundedness, compactness and essential norm of the operator P u , ψ k on the Bloch space are investigated in this paper, and several characterizations for these properties are provided.

1. Introduction

The goal of this paper is to study the boundedness, compactness and essential norm of a linear composition operator on the Bloch space. Let D be the unit disk within the complex plane C , and let H ( D ) denote the set of functions that are analytic on D . We conventionally refer to the collection of all self-maps that are analytic on D as S ( D ) . For a given u H ( D ) and ψ S ( D ) , the weighted composition operator u C ψ is defined by
( u C ψ f ) ( z ) = u ( z ) f ( ψ ( z ) ) , f H ( D ) .
The operator u C ψ is the composition operator C ψ when u = 1 . The primary focus in the field of composition operators is to correlate the operator-theoretic characteristics of C ψ with the function-theoretic properties of ψ . For an in-depth examination of various properties of composition operators, one can referee [1,2] and the references therein.
Furthermore, when u H ( D ) , ψ S ( D ) and n N 0 , the generalized weighted composition operator, also recognized as the weighted differentiation composition operator and denoted by D u , ψ n , is defined by
( D u , ψ n f ) ( z ) = u ( z ) f ( n ) ( ψ ( z ) ) , f H ( D ) .
In the special case where n = 0 , D u , ψ n simplifies to the weighted composition operator. The operator D u , ψ n was introduced by Zhu in [3]. For a comprehensive understanding of the generalized weighted composition operator on some analytic function spaces, one can referee [3,4,5,6,7] and the references therein.
Let n , k N 0 , ψ S ( D ) , and u j H ( D ) , j = 0 , 1 , , k . After the publication of [8], Stević suggested his colleagues to study the following operator:
T u , ψ k , n f = j = 0 k u j · f ( n + j ) ψ = j = 0 k D u j , ψ n + j f , f H ( D ) ,
along with some related operators on C n . Some results in this direction are presented in [9]. When n = 0 , we denote T u , ψ k , 0 by P u , ψ k , which has been recently studied in [10], and a particular case was also investigated in [11]. In particular, when k = 0 , P u , ψ k is just the weighted composition operator u 0 C ψ and the T u , ψ 0 , n is the operator D u 0 , ψ n .
A function f H ( D ) is said to be in the Bloch space, denoted by B , if it satisfies
f β = sup z D 1 | z | 2 | f ( z ) | < .
It is a well-established fact that B is a Banach space when equipped with the norm f B = | f ( 0 ) | + f β . We say that an f H ( D ) belongs to the little Bloch space, denoted by B 0 , if lim | z | 1 | f ( z ) | ( 1 | z | 2 ) = 0 . It is well known that C ψ : B B is bounded by Schwarz–Pick Lemma for any ψ S ( D ) . The compactness for C ψ : B B was initially studied in [12], which showed that C ψ : B B is compact if and only if
lim s 1 sup | ψ ( z ) | > s 1 | z | 2 1 | ψ ( z ) | 2 | ψ ( z ) | = 0 .
Tjani [13] proved that C ψ : B B is compact if and only if lim | a | 1 C ψ σ a B = 0 , where σ a ( z ) = a z 1 a ¯ z . Additionally, Wulan et al. [14] presented a new characterization for the compactness of C ψ : B B , showing that C ψ : B B is compact if and only if lim n ψ n B = 0 . The essential norm of a bounded linear operator is a significant concept in functional analysis, as it provides a measure of the “size" of the operator beyond the behavior of compact operators. In the context of the composition operator acting on the Bloch space, several researchers have made contributions to understand its essential norm. Montes-Rodríguez and Zhao gave an exact essential norm of the composition operator C ψ : B B in [15] and [16], respectively. For further insights into composition operators C ψ : B B , one may refer to the literature [2,12,15,16,17,18]. See [19,20,21,22,23,24] for the study of weighted composition operators u C ψ : B B . Furthermore, the study of generalized weighted composition operators on the Bloch space has been explored in [6,7].
Motivated by the above-mentioned works, by combining the methods of [6,7,9], the aim of this article is to study the operator P u , ψ k : B B . Several characterizations for the boundedness, compactness and essential norm for the operator P u , ψ k : B B are provided. Our results generalized many results in the literature.
Throughout this paper, we say that A B if there exists a constant C such that A C B . The symbol A B means that A B A .

2. Boundedness of P u , ψ k : B B

Lemma 1 
([2]). Let n be a positive integer and f B . Then the following inequalities hold.
(i) 
| f ( z ) | f B log e 1 | z | 2 , z D .
(ii) 
| f ( n ) ( z ) | f B ( 1 | z | 2 ) n , z D .
Throughout this paper, we always assume that u k + 1 = 0 for the simplicity of the notation.
Theorem 1. 
Let k N 0 , ψ S ( D ) and u j H ( D ) , j = 0 , 1 , , k . Then, the following statements are equivalent:
(a) 
The operator P u , ψ k : B B is bounded.
(b) 
sup a D P u , ψ k f t , a B < , for each t = 0 , 1 , , k + 1 . Here,
f 0 , a ( z ) = log e 1 a ¯ z 2 ( log e 1 | a | 2 ) 1 , z D ,
and
f t , a ( z ) = 1 | a | 2 1 a ¯ z σ a t ( z ) = 1 | a | 2 1 a ¯ z a z 1 a ¯ z t , z D , for t = 1 , 2 , , k + 1 .
(c) 
M 0 = sup z D ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u 0 ( z ) | log e 1 | ψ ( z ) | 2 < ; M t = sup z D ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u t 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) + u t ( z ) | ( 1 | ψ ( z ) | 2 ) t < , for t = 1 , 2 , , k + 1 .
Proof. 
( a ) ( b ) Assume that P u , ψ k : B B is bounded. For each a D , it is easy to check that f t , a B for all t = 0 , 1 , , k + 1 . Moreover sup a D f t , a B < for all t = 0 , 1 , , k + 1 . By the boundedness of P u , ψ k : B B , we obtain
sup a D P u , ψ k f t , a B P u , ψ k sup a D f t , a B C P u , ψ k < ,
for all t = 0 , 1 , , k + 1 , as desired.
( b ) ( c ) Assume that ( b ) holds. From the assumption we see that
sup a D P u , ψ k f t , ψ ( a ) B < ,
for all t = 0 , 1 , , k + 1 . For any a D , it is easy to check that f k + 1 , ψ ( a ) B , f k + 1 , ψ ( a ) B < , f k + 1 , ψ ( a ) ( i ) ( ψ ( a ) ) = 0 for all i = 0 , 1 , , k and
f k + 1 , ψ ( a ) ( k + 1 ) ( ψ ( a ) ) = ( k + 1 ) ! ( 1 | ψ ( a ) | 2 ) k + 1 .
Thus,
P u , ψ k f k + 1 , ψ ( a ) B ( 1 | a | 2 ) | ( P u , ψ k f k + 1 , ψ ( a ) ) ( a ) | = ( 1 | a | 2 ) | u k ( a ) ψ ( a ) | | f k + 1 , ψ ( a ) ( k + 1 ) ( ψ ( a ) ) | = ( 1 | a | 2 ) | u k ( a ) ψ ( a ) | ( k + 1 ) ! ( 1 | ψ ( a ) | 2 ) k + 1 .
Therefore, by (1) we have
M k + 1 = sup a D ( 1 | a | 2 ) | u k ( a ) ψ ( a ) | ( 1 | ψ ( a ) | 2 ) k + 1 1 ( k + 1 ) ! sup a D P u , ψ k f k + 1 , ψ ( a ) B < .
For any a D , it is easy to check that f k , ψ ( a ) B , f k , ψ ( a ) B < , f k , ψ ( a ) ( i ) ( ψ ( a ) ) = 0 for   all i = 0 , 1 , , k 1 and
f k , ψ ( a ) ( k ) ( ψ ( a ) ) = k ! ( 1 | ψ ( a ) | 2 ) k .
Using Lemma 1 and (4), we obtain
P u , ψ k f k , ψ ( a ) B ( 1 | a | 2 ) | ( P u , ψ k f k , ψ ( a ) ) ( a ) | ( 1 | a | 2 ) | u k ( a ) + u k 1 ( a ) ψ ( a ) | | f k , ψ ( a ) ( k ) ( ψ ( a ) ) | ( 1 | a | 2 ) | u k ( a ) ψ ( a ) | | f k , ψ ( a ) ( k + 1 ) ( ψ ( a ) ) | ( 1 | a | 2 ) | u k ( a ) + u k 1 ( a ) ψ ( a ) | k ! ( 1 | ψ ( a ) | 2 ) k f k , ψ ( a ) B ( 1 | a | 2 ) | u k ( a ) ψ ( a ) | ( 1 | ψ ( a ) | 2 ) k + 1 .
Thus, using (1), (3) and (5), we have
M k = sup a D ( 1 | a | 2 ) | u k ( a ) + u k 1 ( a ) ψ ( a ) | ( 1 | ψ ( a ) | 2 ) k sup a D P u , ψ k f k , ψ ( a ) B + sup a D ( 1 | a | 2 ) | u k ( a ) ψ ( a ) | ( 1 | ψ ( a ) | 2 ) k + 1 sup a D P u , ψ k f k , ψ ( a ) B + sup a D P u , ψ k f k + 1 , ψ ( a ) B < .
This proves the case t = k . Now, we fix 1 t k 1 and assume that
M i < ,
for all i = t + 1 , , k . We will prove that M t < . For any a D , it is easy to check that f t , ψ ( a ) B , f t , ψ ( a ) B < , f t , ψ ( a ) ( s ) ( ψ ( a ) ) = 0 for   all s < t and
f t , ψ ( a ) ( t ) ( ψ ( a ) ) = t ! ( 1 | ψ ( a ) | 2 ) t .
Using Lemma 1 and (8), we have
P u , ψ k f t , ψ ( a ) B ( 1 | a | 2 ) | ( P u , ψ k f t , ψ ( a ) ) ( a ) | ( 1 | a | 2 ) u t ( a ) + u t 1 ( a ) ψ ( a ) f t , ψ ( a ) ( t ) ( ψ ( a ) ) i = t + 1 k + 1 ( 1 | a | 2 ) u i ( a ) + u i 1 ( a ) ψ ( a ) f t , ψ ( a ) ( i ) ( ψ ( a ) ) ( 1 | a | 2 ) u t ( a ) + u t 1 ( a ) ψ ( a ) t ! ( 1 | ψ ( a ) | 2 ) t i = t + 1 k + 1 f t , ψ ( a ) B ( 1 | a | 2 ) u i ( a ) + u i 1 ( a ) ψ ( a ) ( 1 | ψ ( a ) | 2 ) i .
Thus, by (1), (3), (6) and (9), we have
M t = sup a D ( 1 | a | 2 ) | u t ( a ) + u t 1 ( a ) ψ ( a ) | ( 1 | ψ ( a ) | 2 ) t sup a D P u , ψ k f t , ψ ( a ) B + i = t + 1 k + 1 sup a D ( 1 | a | 2 ) u i ( a ) + u i 1 ( a ) ψ ( a ) ( 1 | ψ ( a ) | 2 ) i i = t k + 1 sup a D P u , ψ k f i , ψ ( a ) B < ,
for every t = 1 , 2 , , k .
Next, we prove that M 0 < . For any a D , we see that f 0 , ψ ( a ) B < and
| f 0 , ψ ( a ) ( ψ ( a ) ) | = log e 1 | ψ ( a ) | 2 .
Using Lemma 1 and (11), we have
P u , ψ k f 0 , ψ ( a ) B ( 1 | a | 2 ) | ( P u , ψ k f 0 , ψ ( a ) ) ( a ) | ( 1 | a | 2 ) | u 0 ( a ) | log e 1 | ψ ( a ) | 2 t = 1 k + 1 f 0 , ψ ( a ) B ( 1 | a | 2 ) | u t ( a ) + u t 1 ( a ) ψ ( a ) | ( 1 | ψ ( a ) | 2 ) t .
Thus, using (1), (3), (10) and (12), we have
M 0 = sup a D ( 1 | a | 2 ) | u 0 ( a ) | log e 1 | ψ ( a ) | 2 sup a D P u , ψ k f 0 , ψ ( a ) B + t = 1 k + 1 sup a D ( 1 | a | 2 ) | u t ( a ) + u t 1 ( a ) ψ ( a ) | ( 1 | ψ ( a ) | 2 ) t sup a D P u , ψ k f 0 , ψ ( a ) B + t = 1 k + 1 sup a D P u , ψ k f t , ψ ( a ) B < ,
as desired.
( c ) ( a ) Suppose that ( c ) holds. Let f B . By Lemma 1,
P u , ψ k f B = | P u , ψ k f ( 0 ) | + P u , ψ k f β = | t = 0 k u t ( 0 ) f ( t ) ( ψ ( 0 ) ) | + sup z D ( 1 | z | 2 ) | t = 0 k ( u t ( z ) f ( t ) ( ψ ( z ) ) + u t ( z ) ψ ( z ) f ( t + 1 ) ( ψ ( z ) ) ) | t = 0 k | u t ( 0 ) | | f ( t ) ( ψ ( 0 ) ) | + sup z D ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u 0 ( z ) | | f ( ψ ( z ) ) | + sup z D ( 1 | z | 2 ) t = 1 k + 1 | u t ( z ) + u t 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) | | f ( t ) ( ψ ( z ) ) | f B ( | u 0 ( 0 ) | log e 1 | ψ ( 0 ) | 2 + t = 1 k | u t ( 0 ) | ( 1 | ψ ( 0 ) | 2 ) t + sup z D ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u 0 ( z ) | log e 1 | ψ ( z ) | 2 + t = 1 k + 1 sup z D ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u t 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) + u t ( z ) | ( 1 | ψ ( z ) | 2 ) t ) f B ( C + t = 0 k + 1 M t ) < .
So P u , ψ k : B B is bounded. Thus ( a ) holds. □
Next, we give another characterization of the boundedness of P u , ψ k : B B . For this purpose, we state some definitions and some lemmas which will be used.
Let v : D R + be a radial weight, i.e., v ( z ) = v ( | z | ) for all z D . Set
H v = { f H ( D ) : f v = sup z D v ( z ) | f ( z ) | < } .
H v is called the weighted space. We denote H v by H v α when v = v α ( z ) = ( 1 | z | 2 ) α ( 0 < α < ) . For a radial weight v, let
v ˜ = ( sup { | f ( z ) | : f H v , f v 1 } ) 1 , z D .
By [20], we see that v ˜ α ( z ) = v α ( z ) and v ˜ log = v log when v = v log ( z ) = log e 1 | z | 2 1 .
Lemma 2 
([25]). Let v and w be radial, non-increasing weights tending to zero at the boundary of D . Then u C ψ : H v H w is bounded if and only if
sup n 0 u ψ n w η n v < .
Moreover,
sup n 0 u ψ n w η n v sup z D w ( z ) v ˜ ( ψ ( z ) ) | u ( z ) | = u C ψ H v H w .
Theorem 2. 
Let k N 0 , ψ S ( D ) and u j H ( D ) , j = 0 , 1 , , k . Then P u , ψ k : B B is bounded if and only if u 0 B ,
sup n 1 log n u 0 ψ n v 1 < ,
and
sup n 1 n t ( u t 1 ψ + u t ) ψ n 1 v 1 < , for t = 1 , 2 , , k + 1 .
Proof. 
We have proved that P u , ψ k : B B is bounded if and only if ( c ) in Theorem 1 holds. By [26], we see that M 0 < is equivalent to u 0 C ψ : H v log H v 1 is bounded. By Lemma 2, this is equivalent to
sup n 1 u 0 ψ n 1 v 1 η n 1 v log < .
By [26], M t < is equivalent to ( u t 1 ψ + u t ) C ψ : H v t H v 1 is bounded, for t = 1 , 2 , , k + 1 . By Lemma 2, this is equivalent to
sup n 1 ( u t 1 ψ + u t ) ψ n 1 v 1 η n 1 v t < , for t = 1 , 2 , , k + 1 .
By [20],
lim n n α η n 1 v α = ( 2 α e ) α and lim n log n η n v log = 1 ,
when α > 0 . Therefore, P u , ψ k : B B is bounded if and only if
max { u 0 B , sup n 1 log n u 0 ψ n v 1 } = max { u 0 B , sup n 2 log ( n 1 ) u 0 ψ n 1 v 1 } sup n 1 u 0 ψ n 1 v 1 η n 1 v log < ,
and
sup n 1 n t ( u t 1 ψ + u t ) ψ n 1 v 1 sup n 1 n t ( u t 1 ψ + u t ) ψ n 1 v 1 n t η n 1 v t < , for t = 1 , 2 , , k + 1 .
The proof is complete. □

3. Essential Norm of P u , ψ k : B B

For r ( 0 , 1 ) , let K r f ( z ) = f ( r z ) . Then K r is compact on B or B 0 with K r B 1 . The following lemma whose proof follows from Proposition 2.1 in [26], Lemma 4.2 in [16] and Cauchy’s integral formula.
Lemma 3. 
There is a sequence { r k } , with 0 < r k < 1 tending to 1, such that the compact operator L n = 1 n k = 1 n K r k acting on B 0 satisfies:
(i) 
For any t [ 0 , 1 ) , n N , lim n sup f B 1 sup | z | t | ( ( I L n ) f ) ( n ) ( z ) | = 0 .
(ii) 
lim sup n sup f B 1 sup | z | > s | ( I L n ) f ( z ) | ( log 1 1 | z | 2 ) 1 1 ,
for s sufficiently close to 1, and
(iii) 
lim n sup f B 1 sup | z | s | ( I L n ) f ( z ) | = 0 , for the above s.
(iv) 
lim sup n I L n 1 .
Furthermore, the same is true for the sequence of biadjoints L n * * (the same form as L n on B 0 ) on B .
Lemma 4. 
Let k N 0 , u j H ( D ) , j = 0 , 1 , , k , ψ S ( D ) with ψ < 1 . If P u , ψ k : B B is bounded, then P u , ψ k : B B is compact.
Proof. 
By the assumption that P u , ψ k : B B is bounded and Theorem 1, we obtain
T 0 : = sup z D ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u 0 ( z ) | < ,
and
T t : = sup z D ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u t ( z ) + u t 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) | < , for t = 1 , 2 , , k + 1 .
Let { f n } n N be bounded in B such that f n 0 uniformly on compact subsets of D as n . Cauchy’s estimate implies that f n ( t ) 0 uniformly on compact subsets of D as n for t = 0 , 1 , , k + 1 . Thus, | P u , ψ k f n ( 0 ) | 0 as n and for the compact subset K = { ψ ( z ) : | ψ ( z ) | ψ } D , we have
sup z D | f n ( t ) ( ψ ( z ) ) | 0 as n .
Using (16) and Lemma 1, we have
sup z D ( 1 | z | 2 ) | t = 0 k ( u t ( z ) f n ( t ) ( ψ ( z ) ) + u t ( z ) ψ ( z ) f n ( t + 1 ) ( ψ ( z ) ) ) | sup z D ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u 0 ( z ) | | f n ( ψ ( z ) ) | + t = 1 k + 1 sup z D ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u t ( z ) + u t 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) | | f n ( t ) ( ψ ( z ) ) | T 0 sup z D | f n ( ψ ( z ) ) | + t = 1 k + 1 T t sup z D | f n ( t ) ( ψ ( z ) ) | ,
which implies that P u , ψ k f n B 0 as n . Hence, P u , ψ k : B B is compact. The proof is complete. □
Next, we state and prove the main results in this section. For simplicity, let
A i = lim | a | 1 P u , ψ k f i , a B , for i = 0 , 1 , , k + 1 ;
B 0 = lim r 1 sup | ψ ( z ) | > r ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u 0 ( z ) | log e 1 | ψ ( z ) | 2 ;
B t = lim r 1 sup | ψ ( z ) | > r ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u t 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) + u t ( z ) | ( 1 | ψ ( z ) | 2 ) t , for t = 1 , 2 , , k + 1 .
Theorem 3. 
Let k N 0 , ψ S ( D ) with ψ = 1 and u j H ( D ) , j = 0 , 1 , , k . If P u , ψ k : B B is bounded, then
P u , ψ k e , B B max 0 i k + 1 A i max 0 i k + 1 B i .
Proof. 
We first prove that
max 0 i k + 1 A i P u , ψ k e , B B .
Let a D { 0 } . It is easy to see that f i , a ( i = 0 , 1 , , k + 1 ) B and { f i , a } converges to 0 uniformly on compact subsets of D as | a | 1 . Since f i , a B 0 for i = 0 , 1 , , k + 1 , this ensures that { f i , a } tends to 0 weakly in B , and thus for any compact operator K : B B , we have
lim | a | 1 K f i , a B = 0 , for all i = 0 , 1 , , k + 1 .
Hence, for each i = 0 , 1 , , k + 1 ,
P u , ψ k K B B lim sup | a | 1 ( P u , ψ k K ) f i , a B A i ,
which implies that
P u , ψ k e , B B = inf K P u , ψ k K B B max 0 i k + 1 A i .
Next, let { z n } n N be a sequence in D with | ψ ( z n ) | 1 as n such that
lim r 1 sup | ψ ( z ) | > r ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u k ( z ) ψ ( z ) | ( 1 | ψ ( z ) | 2 ) k + 1 = lim n ( 1 | z n | 2 ) | u k ( z n ) ψ ( z n ) | ( 1 | ψ ( z n ) | 2 ) k + 1 .
For each n, define
f k + 1 , n ( z ) = 1 | ψ ( z n ) | 2 1 ψ ( z n ) ¯ z σ ψ ( z n ) k + 1 ( z ) , z D .
Then f k + 1 , n B and f k + 1 , n B 1 , f k + 1 , n ( i ) ( ψ ( z n ) ) = 0 for all i = 0 , 1 , , k and
| f k + 1 , n ( k + 1 ) ( ψ ( z n ) ) | = ( k + 1 ) ! ( 1 | ψ ( z n ) | 2 ) k + 1 .
Similarly, { f k + 1 , n } n N is bounded in B and f k + 1 , n 0 weakly in B . Thus, for any compact operator K : B B , lim n K f k + 1 , n B = 0 . Further, we obtain
P u , ψ k K B B lim sup n ( P u , ψ k K ) f k + 1 , n B lim sup n P u , ψ k f k + 1 , n B ,
and hence
P u , ψ k e , B B = inf K P u , ψ k K B B lim sup n P u , ψ k f k + 1 , n B .
Using (18) and (19) we obtain
P u , ψ k e , B B lim sup n P u , ψ k f k + 1 , n B lim sup n ( 1 | z n | 2 ) | t = 0 k ( u t ( z n ) f k + 1 , n ( t ) ( ψ ( z n ) ) + u t ( z n ) ψ ( z n ) f k + 1 , n ( t + 1 ) ( ψ ( z n ) ) ) | = lim sup n ( k + 1 ) ! ( 1 | z n | 2 ) | u k ( z n ) ψ ( z n ) | ( 1 | ψ ( z n ) | 2 ) k + 1 .
Since | ψ ( z n ) | 1 as n , it follows from (17) and (20) that
P u , ψ k e , B B B k + 1 .
Similarly to the proof of Theorem 1 and the above statements, we can obtain
P u , ψ k e , B B B t for all t = 0 , 1 , , k .
Finally, we prove that
P u , ψ k e , B B max 0 i k + 1 A i and P u , ψ k e , B B max 0 i k + 1 B i .
Let { L n } be given in Lemma 3. Since each L n * * is compact on B , P u , ψ k L n * * is also compact on B and we obtain
P u , ψ k e , B B lim sup n P u , ψ k P u , ψ k L n * * B B .
Therefore, we only need to prove that
lim sup n P u , ψ k P u , ψ k L n * * B B max 0 i k + 1 A i
and
lim sup n P u , ψ k P u , ψ k L n * * B B max 0 i k + 1 B i .
For any f B such that f B 1 , we consider
P u , ψ k e , B B lim sup n P u , ψ k P u , ψ k L n * * = lim sup n P u , ψ k ( I L n * * ) lim sup n sup f B 1 P u , ψ k ( I L n * * ) f B = lim sup n sup f B 1 | P u , ψ k ( I L n * * ) f ( 0 ) | + lim sup n sup f B 1 P u , ψ k ( I L n * * ) f β = lim sup n sup f B 1 | j = 0 k u j ( 0 ) ( I L n * * ) f ( j ) ( ψ ( 0 ) ) | + lim sup n sup f B 1 j = 0 k u j ( I L n * * ) f ( j ) ψ β .
Lemma 3 guarantees that
lim sup n sup f B 1 j = 0 k | u j ( 0 ) | | ( I L n * * ) f ( j ) ( ψ ( 0 ) ) | = 0 .
Now we consider
J = lim sup n sup f B 1 j = 0 k u j ( I L n * * ) f ( j ) ψ β .
Let f B with f B 1 . Then
J = lim sup n sup f B 1 j = 0 k u j ( I L n * * ) f ( j ) ψ β = lim sup n sup z D ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u 0 ( z ) ( I L n * * ) f ( ψ ( z ) ) + u k ( z ) ψ ( z ) ( I L n * * ) f ( k + 1 ) ( ψ ( z ) ) + j = 1 k u j ( z ) + u j 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) ( I L n * * ) f ( j ) ( ψ ( z ) ) | lim sup n sup | ψ ( z ) | r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) | ( I L n * * ) f ( ψ ( z ) ) | | u 0 ( z ) | + lim sup n sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) | ( I L n * * ) f ( ψ ( z ) ) | | u 0 ( z ) | + lim sup n sup | ψ ( z ) | r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) j = 1 k ( I L n * * ) f ( j ) ( ψ ( z ) ) | u j ( z ) + u j 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) | + lim sup n sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) j = 1 k ( I L n * * ) f ( j ) ( ψ ( z ) ) | u j ( z ) + u j 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) | + lim sup n sup | ψ ( z ) | r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) ( I L n * * ) f ( k + 1 ) ( ψ ( z ) ) | u k ( z ) ψ ( z ) | + lim sup n sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) ( I L n * * ) f ( k + 1 ) ( ψ ( z ) ) | u k ( z ) ψ ( z ) | = Q 1 + Q 2 + Q 3 + Q 4 + Q 5 + Q 6 ,
where N N is large enough such that r n 1 2 for all n N ,
Q 1 : = lim sup n sup | ψ ( z ) | r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) | ( I L n * * ) f ( ψ ( z ) ) | | u 0 ( z ) | ,
Q 2 : = lim sup n sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) | ( I L n * * ) f ( ψ ( z ) ) | | u 0 ( z ) | ,
Q 3 : = lim sup n sup | ψ ( z ) | r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) j = 1 k ( I L n * * ) f ( j ) ( ψ ( z ) ) | u j ( z ) + u j 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) | ,
and
Q 4 : = lim sup n sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) j = 1 k ( I L n * * ) f ( j ) ( ψ ( z ) ) | u j ( z ) + u j 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) | ,
Q 5 : = lim sup n sup | ψ ( z ) | r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) ( I L n * * ) f ( k + 1 ) ( ψ ( z ) ) | u k ( z ) ψ ( z ) |
and
Q 6 : = lim sup n sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) ( I L n * * ) f ( k + 1 ) ( ψ ( z ) ) | u k ( z ) ψ ( z ) | .
Since P u , ψ k : B B is bounded, from Theorem 1, we obtain that T t < ( t = 0 , 1 , , k + 1 ) , where T t is defined in Lemma 4. Since f r n ( t ) f ( t ) ( t = 0 , 1 , , k + 1 ) uniformly on compact subsets of D as n , by Lemma 3 we have
Q 1 T 0 lim sup n sup | w | r N | ( I L n * * ) f ( w ) | = 0 ,
Q 3 j = 1 k T j lim sup n sup | w | r N | ( I L n * * ) f ( j ) ( w ) | = 0 ,
and
Q 5 T k + 1 lim sup n sup | w | r N | ( I L n * * ) f ( k + 1 ) ( w ) | = 0 .
Next we consider Q 6 . We have Q 6 = lim sup n Q 61 , where
Q 61 : = sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) ( I L n * * ) f ( k + 1 ) ( ψ ( z ) ) | u k ( z ) ψ ( z ) | .
Using the fact that f B 1 , Lemmas 1 and 3, we have
Q 61 = sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u k ( z ) ψ ( z ) | ( 1 | ψ ( z ) | 2 ) k + 1 ( 1 | ψ ( z ) | 2 ) k + 1 ( I L n * * ) f ( k + 1 ) ( ψ ( z ) ) I L n * * B B f B sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u k ( z ) ψ ( z ) | ( 1 | ψ ( z ) | 2 ) k + 1 I L n * * B B f B ( k + 1 ) ! sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u k ( z ) ψ ( z ) | | f k + 1 , ψ ( z ) ( k + 1 ) ( ψ ( z ) ) |
sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) | P u , ψ k f k + 1 , ψ ( z ) ( z ) | sup | a | > r N P u , ψ k f k + 1 , a B .
Taking limit as N we obtain
Q 6 = lim sup n Q 61 lim sup | a | 1 P u , ψ k f k + 1 , a B = A k + 1 .
From (30),
Q 6 = lim sup n Q 61 lim r 1 sup | ψ ( z ) | > r ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u k ( z ) ψ ( z ) | ( 1 | ψ ( z ) | 2 ) k + 1 = B k + 1 .
Next we consider Q 4 . We have Q 4 = lim sup n Q 41 , where
Q 41 : = j = 1 k sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) ( I L n * * ) f ( j ) ( ψ ( z ) ) | u j ( z ) + u j 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) | .
Using the fact that f B 1 , Lemma 1, Lemma 3 and (31), we have
sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) ( I L n * * ) f ( k ) ( ψ ( z ) ) | u k ( z ) + u k 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) | I L n * * B B f B k ! sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N k ! ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u k ( z ) + u k 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) | ( 1 | ψ ( z ) | 2 ) k sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) | P u , ψ k f k , ψ ( z ) ( z ) u k ( z ) ψ ( z ) f k , ψ ( z ) ( k + 1 ) ( ψ ( z ) ) | sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) | P u , ψ k f k , ψ ( z ) ( z ) | + | u k ( z ) ψ ( z ) | | f k , ψ ( z ) ( k + 1 ) ( ψ ( z ) ) | sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) | P u , ψ k f k , ψ ( z ) ( z ) | + f k , ψ ( z ) B | u k ( z ) ψ ( z ) | ( 1 | ψ ( z ) | 2 ) k + 1 sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N sup | a | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) | P u , ψ k f k , a ( z ) | + | P u , ψ k f k + 1 , a ( z ) | sup | a | > r N P u , ψ k f k , a B + sup | a | > r N P u , ψ k f k + 1 , a B .
Further, fix 1 j k 1 and assume that
sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) | ( I L n * * ) f ( i ) ( ψ ( z ) ) | | u i ( z ) + u i 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) | I L n * * B B f B sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u i ( z ) + u i 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) | ( 1 | ψ ( z ) | 2 ) i sup | a | > r N P u , ψ k f i , a B + t = i + 1 k + 1 sup | a | > r N P u , ψ k f t , a B
for each i = j + 1 , , k . Now we establish (35) for i = j . Using the fact that f B 1 , Lemmas 1 and 3, (31) and (35), we have
sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) | ( I L n * * ) f ( j ) ( ψ ( z ) ) | | u j ( z ) + u j 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) | I L n * * B B f B j ! sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N j ! ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u j ( z ) + u j 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) | ( 1 | ψ ( z ) | 2 ) j = I L n * * B B f B j ! sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) | P u , ψ k f j , ψ ( z ) ( z ) i = j + 1 k u i ( z ) + u i 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) f j , ψ ( z ) ( i ) ( ψ ( z ) ) u k ( z ) ψ ( z ) f j , ψ ( z ) ( k + 1 ) ( ψ ( z ) ) | sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) | P u , ψ k f j , ψ ( z ) ( z ) | + i = j + 1 k + 1 | u i ( z ) + u i 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) | | f j , ψ ( z ) ( i ) ( ψ ( z ) ) | sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) | P u , ψ k f j , ψ ( z ) ( z ) | + i = j + 1 k + 1 f j , ψ ( z ) B | u i ( z ) + u i 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) | ( 1 | ψ ( z ) | 2 ) i sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N sup | a | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) ( | P u , ψ k f j , a ( z ) | + i = j + 1 k | P u , ψ k f i , a ( z ) | + t = i + 1 k + 1 | P u , ψ k f t , a ( z ) | + | P u , ψ k f k + 1 , a ( z ) | ) sup | a | > r N P u , ψ k f j , a B + i = j + 1 k + 1 sup | a | > r N P u , ψ k f i , a B
for every j = 1 , 2 , , k . After a calculation, using (36), we have
Q 41 j = 1 k I L n * * B B f B sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u j ( z ) + u j 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) | ( 1 | ψ ( z ) | 2 ) j
j = 1 k sup | a | > r N P u , ψ k f j , a B + j = 1 k i = j + 1 k + 1 sup | a | > r N P u , ψ k f i , a B .
Taking the limit as N we obtain
Q 4 = lim sup n Q 41 lim sup | a | 1 i = 1 k + 1 P u , ψ k f i , a B = i = 1 k + 1 A i max 1 i k + 1 A i .
From (37), we see that
Q 4 = lim sup n Q 41 lim r 1 sup | ψ ( z ) | > r j = 1 k ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u j ( z ) + u j 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) | ( 1 | ψ ( z ) | 2 ) j max 1 i k B i .
We have Q 2 = lim sup n Q 21 , where
Q 21 : = sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) | ( I L n * * ) f ( ψ ( z ) ) | | u 0 ( z ) | .
Using the fact that f B 1 , Lemma 1, Lemma 3, (31) and (36), we have
Q 21 I L n * * B B f B sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u 0 ( z ) | log e 1 | ψ ( z ) | 2 = I L n * * B B f B sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) | P u , ψ k f 0 , ψ ( z ) ( z ) j = 1 k u j ( z ) + u j 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) f 0 , ψ ( z ) ( j ) ( ψ ( z ) ) u k ( z ) ψ ( z ) f 0 , ψ ( z ) ( k + 1 ) ( ψ ( z ) ) | sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) P u , ψ k f 0 , ψ ( z ) ( z ) + j = 1 k + 1 | u j ( z ) + u j 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) | | f 0 , ψ ( z ) ( j ) ( ψ ( z ) ) | sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) P u , ψ k f 0 , ψ ( z ) ( z ) + j = 1 k + 1 f 0 , ψ ( z ) B | u j ( z ) + u j 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) | ( 1 | ψ ( z ) | 2 ) j sup | ψ ( z ) | > r N sup | a | > r N ( 1 | z | 2 ) ( P u , ψ k f 0 , a ( z ) + P u , ψ k f k + 1 , a ( z ) + j = 1 k P u , ψ k f j , a ( z ) + i = j + 1 k + 1 P u , ψ k f i , a ( z ) ) sup | a | > r N P u , ψ k f 0 , a B + j = 1 k + 1 sup | a | > r N P u , ψ k f j , a B + j = 1 k i = j + 1 k + 1 sup | a | > r N P u , ψ k f i , a B .
Taking limit as N we obtain
Q 2 = lim sup n Q 21 lim sup | a | 1 i = 0 k + 1 P u , ψ k f i , a B = i = 0 k + 1 A i max 1 i k + 1 A i .
From (41), we see that
Q 2 = lim sup n Q 21 lim r 1 sup | ψ ( z ) | > r ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u 0 ( z ) | log e 1 | ψ ( z ) | 2 = B 0 .
Hence by (24)–(29), (32), (39) and (42) we obtain
P u , ψ k e , B B lim sup n P u , ψ k P u , ψ k L n * * B B lim sup n sup f B 1 P u , ψ k ( I L n * * ) f B = lim sup n sup f B 1 j = 0 k u j ( I L n * * ) f ( j ) ψ β max 0 i k + 1 A i .
Similarly, by (24)–(29), (33), (40) and (43) we obtain
P u , ψ k e , B B lim sup n P u , ψ k P u , ψ k L n * * B B max 0 i k + 1 B i .
This completes the proof. □
From Theorem 3, we immediately obtain the following characterization for the compactness of P u , ψ k : B B .
Corollary 1. 
Let k N 0 , ψ S ( D ) and u j H ( D ) , j = 0 , 1 , , k . If P u , ψ k : B B is bounded, then the following statements are equivalent.
(a) 
The operator P u , ψ k : B B is compact.
(b) 
lim | ψ ( a ) | 1 P u , ψ k f t , ψ ( a ) B = 0 , for t = 0 , 1 , , k + 1 .
(c) 
lim r 1 sup | ψ ( z ) | > r ( 1 | z | 2 ) | u t 1 ( z ) ψ ( z ) + u t ( z ) | ( 1 | ψ ( z ) | 2 ) t = 0 , for t = 0 , 1 , 2 , , k + 1 .
By [25,26], we have the following lemma.
Lemma 5. 
Let v and w be radial, non-increasing weights tending to zero at the boundary of D . Suppose u C ψ : H v H w is bounded. Then,
u C ψ e , H v H w = lim s 1 sup | ψ ( z ) | > s w ( z ) v ˜ ( ψ ( z ) ) | u ( z ) | = lim sup n u ψ n w η n v .
Using Lemma 5, we give another characterization for the essential norm of P u , ψ k : B B .
Theorem 4. 
Let k N 0 , ψ S ( D ) and u j H ( D ) , j = 0 , 1 , , k . If P u , ψ k : B B is bounded, then
P u , ψ k e , B B max 0 i k + 1 D i ,
where D 0 = lim sup n log n u 0 ψ n v 1 and
D t = lim sup n n t ( u t 1 ψ + u t ) ψ n 1 v 1 , for t = 1 , 2 , , k + 1 .
Proof. 
According to Lemma 2, we known that the boundedness of P u , ψ k : B B is equivalent to the boundedness of u 0 C ψ : H v log H v 1 and ( u t 1 ψ + u t ) C ψ : H v t H v 1 for all t = 1 , 2 , , k + 1 .
The upper estimate. By [20],
lim n n α η n 1 v α = ( 2 α e ) α and lim n log n η n v log = 1 ,
when α > 0 . By Lemma 5, we obtain
u 0 C ψ e , H v log H v 1 = lim sup n u 0 ψ n 1 v 1 η n 1 v log = lim sup n log ( n 1 ) u 0 ψ n 1 v 1 log ( n 1 ) η n 1 v log lim sup n log ( n 1 ) u 0 ψ n 1 v 1 = lim sup n log n u 0 ψ n v 1 ,
and
( u t 1 ψ + u t ) C ψ e , H v t H v 1 = lim sup n ( u t 1 ψ + u t ) ψ n 1 v 1 η n 1 v t = lim sup n n t ( u t 1 ψ + u t ) ψ n 1 v 1 n t η n 1 v t lim sup n n t ( u t 1 ψ + u t ) ψ n 1 v 1 , t = 1 , 2 , , k + 1 .
It follows that
P u , ψ k e , B B u 0 C ψ e , H v log H v 1 + t = 1 k + 1 ( u t 1 ψ + u t ) C ψ e , H v t H v 1 t = 0 k + 1 D t max 0 t k + 1 D t .
The lower estimate. By Theorem 3 and Lemma 5, we have
P u , ψ k e , B B B 0 = u 0 C ψ e , H v log H v 1 = lim sup n u 0 ψ n 1 v 1 η n 1 v log lim sup n log ( n 1 ) u 0 ψ n 1 v 1 = lim sup n log n u 0 ψ n v 1 ,
and
P u , ψ k e , B B B t = ( u t 1 ψ + u t ) C ψ e , H v t H v 1 = lim sup n ( u t 1 ψ + u t ) ψ n 1 v 1 η n 1 v t lim sup n n t ( u t 1 ψ + u t ) ψ n 1 v 1 , for t = 1 , 2 , , k + 1 .
Therefore
P u , ψ k e , B B max 0 i k + 1 D i .
This completes the proof of this theorem. □
From Theorem 4, we immediately obtain the following corollary.
Corollary 2. 
Let k N 0 , ψ S ( D ) and u j H ( D ) , j = 0 , 1 , , k . If P u , ψ k : B B is bounded, then P u , ψ k : B B is compact if and only if lim sup n log n u 0 ψ n v 1 = 0 and
lim sup n n t ( u t 1 ψ + u t ) ψ n 1 v 1 = 0 , for t = 1 , 2 , , k + 1 .

4. Conclusions

In this paper, we investigate the boundedness, compactness and essential norm of the operator P u , ψ k and give several characterizations for these properties on the Bloch space. Our approaches are inspired by [6,7] for the studying of generalized weighted composition operators on Bloch-type spaces, and [9] for the studying of polynomial differentiation composition operators from H p spaces to weighted-type spaces. We combine the methods of these three articles. And our proof is more detailed than [10]. Finally, our results generalized many results in the literature. For example, by Theorems 3 and 4, we can obtain the characterization of the essential norm of weighted composition operators u C ψ on the Bloch space (see [20,22]) and generalized weighted composition operator D u , ψ n on the Bloch space (see [7]).

Author Contributions

X.Z. and Q.H. wrote and edited the original manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The first author was supported by Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (No. 2023A1515010614).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Cowen, C.; Maccluer, B. Composition Operators on Spaces of Analytic Functions; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhu, K. Operator Theory in Function Spaces; American Mathematical Society: Providence, RI, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhu, X. Products of differentiation, composition and multiplication from Bergman type spaces to Bers type space. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2007, 18, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Stević, S. Weighted differentiation composition operators from the mixed-norm space to the n-th weigthed-type space on the unit disk. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2010, 2010, 246287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Stević, S. Weighted differentiation composition operators from H and Bloch spaces to n-th weighted-type spaces on the unit disk. Appl. Math. Comput. 2010, 216, 3634–3641. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhu, X. Generalized weighted composition operators on Bloch-type spaces. J. Inequal. Appl. 2015, 2015, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhu, X. Essential norm of generalized weighted composition operators on Bloch-type spaces. Appl. Math. Comput. 2016, 274, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stević, S.; Sharma, A.; Krishan, R. Boundedness and compactness of a new product-type operator from a general space to Bloch-type spaces. J. Inequal. Appl. 2016, 2016, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Stević, S.; Ueki, S. Polynomial differentiation composition operators from Hp spaces to weighted-type spaces on the unit ball. J. Math. Inequal. 2023, 17, 365–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, S.; Wang, M.; Guo, X. Products of composition, multiplication and iterated differentiation operators between Banach spaces of holomorphic functions. Taiwan J. Math. 2020, 24, 355–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sharma, A.; Sharma, A. Boundedness, compactness and the Hyers–Ulam stability of a linear combination of differential operators. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory 2020, 14, 14. [Google Scholar]
  12. Madigan, K.; Matheson, A. Compact composition operators on the Bloch space. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 1995, 347, 2679–2687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tjani, M. Compact Composition Operators on Some Möbius Invariant Banach Space. Ph.D. Dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wulan, H.; Zheng, D.; Zhu, K. Compact composition operators on BMOA and the Bloch space. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2009, 137, 3861–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Montes-Rodríguez, A. The essential norm of a composition operator on Bloch spaces. Pac. J. Math. 1999, 188, 339–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhao, R. Essential norms of composition operators between Bloch type spaces. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 2010, 138, 2537–2546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, S. Differences of generalized composition operators on the Bloch space. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2012, 394, 706–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ohno, S. Weighted composition operators between H and the Bloch space. Taiwan J. Math. 2001, 5, 555–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Colonna, F. New criteria for boundedness and compactness of weighted composition operators mapping into the Bloch space. Cent. Eur. J. Math. 2013, 11, 55–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hyvärinen, O.; Lindström, M. Estimates of essential norm of weighted composition operators between Bloch-type spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2012, 393, 38–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, X.; Li, S. Norm and essential norm of a weighted composition operator on the Bloch space. Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 2017, 87, 309–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Manhas, J.; Zhao, R. New estimates of essential norms of weighted composition operators between Bloch type spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2012, 389, 32–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ohno, S.; Stroethoff, K.; Zhao, R. Weighted composition operators between Bloch-type spaces. Rocky Mt. J. Math. 2003, 33, 191–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ohno, S.; Zhao, R. Weighted composition operators on the Bloch space. Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 2001, 63, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hyvärinen, O.; Kemppainen, M.; Lindström, M.; Rautio, A.; Saukko, E. The essential norm of weighted composition operators on weighted Banach spaces of analytic functions. Integral Equ. Oper. Theory 2012, 72, 151–157. [Google Scholar]
  26. Montes-Rodríguez, A. Weighed composition operators on weighted Banach spaces of analytic functions. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 2000, 61, 872–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, X.; Hu, Q. A Linear Composition Operator on the Bloch Space. Mathematics 2024, 12, 2373. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12152373

AMA Style

Zhu X, Hu Q. A Linear Composition Operator on the Bloch Space. Mathematics. 2024; 12(15):2373. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12152373

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Xiangling, and Qinghua Hu. 2024. "A Linear Composition Operator on the Bloch Space" Mathematics 12, no. 15: 2373. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12152373

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop