Next Article in Journal
Some Probabilistic Interpretations Related to the Next-Generation Matrix Theory: A Review with Examples
Previous Article in Journal
Research on Stability and Bifurcation for Two-Dimensional Two-Parameter Squared Discrete Dynamical Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pricing of Al-Urbun and a Class of Al-Istijrar Islamic Contracts under the Black–Scholes Framework
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effects of the Introduction of Volume-Based Liquidity Constraints in Portfolio Optimization with Alternative Investments

by
Diana Barro
1,†,
Antonella Basso
1,*,†,
Stefania Funari
2,† and
Guglielmo Alessandro Visentin
1,2,†
1
Department of Economics, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, 30121 Venice, Italy
2
Department of Management, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, 30121 Venice, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Mathematics 2024, 12(15), 2424; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12152424
Submission received: 3 July 2024 / Revised: 31 July 2024 / Accepted: 2 August 2024 / Published: 4 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Financial Mathematics, 3rd Edition)

Abstract

Recently, liquidity issues in financial markets and portfolio asset management have attracted much attention among investors and scholars, fuelling a stream of research devoted to exploring the role of liquidity in investment decisions. In this paper, we aim to investigate the effects of introducing liquidity in portfolio optimization problems. For this purpose, first we consider three volume-based liquidity measures proposed in the literature and we build a new one particularly suited to portfolio optimization. Secondly, we formulate an extended version of the Markowitz portfolio selection problem, named mean–variance–liquidity, wherein the goal is to minimize the portfolio variance subject to the usual constraint on the expected portfolio return and an additional constraint on the portfolio liquidity. Thirdly, we consider a sensitivity analysis, with the aim to assess the trade-offs between liquidity and return, on the one hand, and between liquidity and risk, on the other hand. In the second part of the paper, the portfolio optimization framework is applied to a dataset of US ETFs comprising both standard and alternative, often illiquid, investments. The analysis is carried out with all the liquidity measures considered, allowing us to shed light on the relationships among risk, return and liquidity. Finally, we study the effects of the introduction of a Bitcoin ETF, as an asset with an extremely high expected return and risk.
Keywords: portfolio optimization; liquidity measures; return–liquidity opportunity cost; trading volume; alternative investments portfolio optimization; liquidity measures; return–liquidity opportunity cost; trading volume; alternative investments

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barro, D.; Basso, A.; Funari, S.; Visentin, G.A. The Effects of the Introduction of Volume-Based Liquidity Constraints in Portfolio Optimization with Alternative Investments. Mathematics 2024, 12, 2424. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12152424

AMA Style

Barro D, Basso A, Funari S, Visentin GA. The Effects of the Introduction of Volume-Based Liquidity Constraints in Portfolio Optimization with Alternative Investments. Mathematics. 2024; 12(15):2424. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12152424

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barro, Diana, Antonella Basso, Stefania Funari, and Guglielmo Alessandro Visentin. 2024. "The Effects of the Introduction of Volume-Based Liquidity Constraints in Portfolio Optimization with Alternative Investments" Mathematics 12, no. 15: 2424. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12152424

APA Style

Barro, D., Basso, A., Funari, S., & Visentin, G. A. (2024). The Effects of the Introduction of Volume-Based Liquidity Constraints in Portfolio Optimization with Alternative Investments. Mathematics, 12(15), 2424. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12152424

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop