Next Article in Journal
On the Sub and Supersolution Method for Nonlinear Elliptic Equations with a Convective Term, in Orlicz Spaces
Previous Article in Journal
Polytomous Knowledge Structures Based on Entail Relations
Previous Article in Special Issue
Parameterized Finite Binomial Sums
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Partial Derivative Equations and Identities for Hermite-Based Peters-Type Simsek Polynomials and Their Applications

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Usak University, 1 Eylul Campus, Usak 64200, Turkey
Mathematics 2024, 12(16), 2505; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12162505
Submission received: 18 May 2024 / Revised: 8 August 2024 / Accepted: 12 August 2024 / Published: 14 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integral Transforms and Special Functions in Applied Mathematics)

Abstract

:
The objective of this paper is to investigate Hermite-based Peters-type Simsek polynomials with generating functions. By using generating function methods, we determine some of the properties of these polynomials. By applying the derivative operator to the generating functions of these polynomials, we also determine many of the identities and relations that encompass these polynomials and special numbers and polynomials. Moreover, using integral techniques, we obtain some formulas covering the Cauchy numbers, the Peters-type Simsek numbers and polynomials of the first kind, the two-variable Hermite polynomials, and the Hermite-based Peters-type Simsek polynomials.

1. Introduction

Generating functions and special functions are powerful techniques to analyze and solve some real-world and mathematical problems. These functions are widely used in many areas, such as combinatorics, number theory, and probability theory. Moreover, special numbers and polynomials, owing to their multitude of applications, contribute significantly to many areas of discipline. Using the generating function methods, many authors have carried out studies on special numbers and polynomials and they have obtained many results (see for details, [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]). One of these is Hermite polynomials, which have a wide range of applications and have yielded interesting relations, as found by many researchers (see [1,2,4,8,11,12,15,36,37,38,39,41,42]). Thus, the aim of this paper is to establish novel and applicable formulas for some special numbers and polynomials with the help of generating function techniques and derivative and integral operators. By applying derivative and integral operators to the generating functions of the Hermite-type combinatorial Simsek polynomials, we determine novel formulas and identities, including the Cauchy numbers, the Stirling numbers of the first kind, the Peters-type Simsek numbers of the first and second kinds, the Peters-type Simsek polynomials of the first kind, the two-variable Hermite polynomials, and the Hermite-based Peters-type Simsek polynomials. Before presenting these novel results, we will list some definitions and notations that will be utilized throughout this paper:
N , Z , Q , R , and C represent the set of natural numbers, the set of integers, the set of rational numbers, the set of real numbers, and the set of complex numbers, respectively. Let N 0 = N 0 and
w n = w w 1 w 2 w n + 1 .
The Stirling numbers of the first kind are defined by
log 1 + t k k ! = n = 0 S 1 n , k t n n ! ,
where k N 0 (see [3,23,24,34,43,44,45]).
The numbers S 1 n , k are also given by the following formula:
w n = k = 0 n S 1 n , k w k
(see [34,43,44,45]).
The two-variable Hermite polynomials H n ( j ) ( x , y ) are defined by
f H ( t ; x , y , j ) = e x t + y t j = n = 0 H n ( j ) x , y t n n ! ,
where j 2 (see [1,2] and [9,28,36,37,38,39,41,42,43,46,47]).
By using (3), one obtains
n = 0 H n ( j ) x , y t n n ! = n = 0 x n t n n ! n = 0 y n t j n n ! .
By applying the series product rule to the above equation, we obtain
n = 0 H n ( j ) x , y t n n ! = n = 0 k = 0 n j x n j k y k n j k ! k ! t n ,
where [ b ] is the largest integer b . Comparing the coefficients of t n on both sides of the above equation, we arrive at the following well-known formula for the polynomials H n ( j ) x , y :
H n ( j ) x , y = n ! k = 0 n j x n j k y k n j k ! k !
(see [1,2,43,46]). For y = 1 2 and j = 2 in (3), we have the following well-known Hermite’s differential equation
e 1 2 x 2 u + λ e 1 2 x 2 u = 0 ,
where λ is a constant.
The Cauchy numbers of the first kind are defined by
c n = 0 1 w n d w
(see [43,48]). That is,
c n n ! = 0 1 w n d w .
The Peters polynomials S n w ; λ , μ are defined by
1 + t w 1 + 1 + t λ μ = n = 0 S n w ; λ , μ t n n !
(see [10,25,44,45]).
The Peters-type Simsek numbers of the first kind Y n λ and the Peters-type Simsek polynomials of the first kind Y n w ; λ are defined by, respectively,
F t ; λ = 2 λ ( 1 + λ t ) 1 = n = 0 Y n λ t n n !
and
F t ; w , λ = 2 ( 1 + λ t ) w λ ( 1 + λ t ) 1 = n = 0 Y n w ; λ t n n ! ,
where λ R (or C ) (see [26]).
The higher-order Peters-type Simsek numbers and polynomials of the first kind are defined by, respectively,
2 λ 2 t + λ 1 k = n = 0 Y n ( k ) λ t n n !
and
2 λ 2 t + λ 1 k 1 + λ t w = n = 0 Y n ( k ) w ; λ t n n ! ,
where λ R (or C ) (see [21,22]).
Substituting k = 1 into (8) and (9), one obtains
Y n ( 1 ) ( λ ) = Y n ( λ )
and
Y n ( 1 ) ( w ; λ ) = Y n ( w ; λ ) .
The Peters-type Simsek numbers of the second kind Y n , 2 ( λ ) and the Peters-type Simsek polynomials of the second kind Y n , 2 ( w ; λ ) are defined by, respectively,
2 λ 2 t + 2 ( λ 1 ) = n = 0 Y n , 2 λ t n n !
and
2 1 + λ t w λ 2 t + 2 ( λ 1 ) = n = 0 Y n , 2 w ; λ t n n ! ,
where λ R (or C ) (see [31]).
From (6) and (10), one can easily see that
Y n , 2 λ = 2 n 1 Y n λ
(see [31]).
We note that many authors have studied the numbers and polynomials given in Equations (6)–(11). These numbers and polynomials are members of the Peters polynomials given in Equation (5), which is also a generalization of the Boole polynomials (see [5,6,7,12,13,14,15,16,19,20,21,22,27,32]).
In [38], the author defined two new families of polynomials, called the Hermite-type combinatorial Simsek polynomials. These polynomials are denoted by H n ( j ) Y x , y ; λ and H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j , and are defined as follows:
H 1 t ; x , y ; λ , j = 2 λ ( 1 + λ t ) 1 e x t + y t j = n = 0 H n ( j ) Y x , y ; λ t n n !
and
H 2 t ; x , y , w ; λ , j = 2 1 + λ t w λ ( 1 + λ t ) 1 e x t + y t j = n = 0 H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! ,
where j 2 , λ R (or C ), and x , y R (see also [39]).
When x = y = 0 in (13) and (14), we have
H n ( j ) Y 0 , 0 ; λ = Y n ( λ )
and
H n Y 0 , 0 , w ; λ , j = Y n ( w ; λ ) .
The rest of this paper is summarized briefly as follows:
In Section 2, using generating function and integration methods, we obtain some identities and formulas, including the Hermite-type combinatorial Simsek polynomials, the Stirling numbers, the Cauchy numbers, and the Peters-type Simsek numbers and polynomials.
In Section 3, applying a derivative operator to the generating functions of the Hermite-type combinatorial Simsek polynomials, we derive some formulas, including the Hermite-based Peters-type Simsek polynomials, the Stirling numbers, and the special numbers.
Finally, the paper concludes with a conclusion section.

2. Identities and Integral Formulas for the Hermite-Type Combinatorial Simsek Polynomials

In this section, by using generating functions of the Hermite-type combinatorial Simsek polynomials, we obtain identities for these polynomials. By using an integration method, we also obtain formulas covering the Stirling numbers of the first kind, the Cauchy numbers, and the Peters-type Simsek numbers of the first and second kinds.
Theorem 1.
Let n N 0 . Then, we have
H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j = n ! k = 0 n w n k λ n k k ! H k ( j ) Y x , y ; λ .
Proof. 
By using (13) and (14), we obtain
H 2 t ; x , y , w ; λ , j = 1 + λ t w H 1 t ; x , y ; λ , j .
By using the above functional equation with the binomial theorem, assuming that λ t < 1 , we obtain
n = 0 H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! = n = 0 w n λ n t n n = 0 H n ( j ) Y x , y ; λ t n n ! .
Applying the Cauchy product rule to the expression on the right-hand side of the equation yields:
n = 0 H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! = n = 0 k = 0 n w n k λ n k k ! H k ( j ) Y x , y ; λ t n .
By comparing the coefficients of t n on both sides of the above equation, we achieve the desired result. □
Remark 1.
Substituting x = y = 0 into (15), after some calculations, we obtain the following known formula [26] (Equation (2.20)):
Y n ( w ; λ ) = k = 0 n n k λ n k ( w ) n k Y k ( λ ) .
Theorem 2.
Let n N 0 . Then, we have
0 1 H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j d w = k = 0 n n k λ n k H k ( j ) Y x , y ; λ c n k .
Proof. 
Integrating both sides of the Equation (15) with respect to w from 0 to 1, we obtain
0 1 H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j d w = n ! k = 0 n λ n k k ! H k ( j ) Y x , y ; λ 0 1 w n k d w .
Combining the above equation with (4), we obtain
0 1 H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j d w = n ! k = 0 n λ n k n k ! k ! H k ( j ) Y x , y ; λ c n k .
From the above equation, we obtain the desired result. □
Theorem 3.
Let n N 0 . Then, we have
k = 0 n n k H k j x , y 0 1 Y n k w ; λ d w λ n k H k ( j ) Y x , y ; λ c n k = 0 .
Proof. 
Integrating both sides of the Theorem 2 given in [38], with respect to w from 0 to 1, we obtain
0 1 H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j d w = k = 0 n n k H k j x , y 0 1 Y n k w ; λ d w .
Combining (19) with (17), we obtain
k = 0 n n k λ n k H k ( j ) Y x , y ; λ c n k = k = 0 n n k H k j x , y 0 1 Y n k w ; λ d w .
After performing some calculations, we obtain the desired result. □
Theorem 4.
Let n N 0 . Then, we have
k = 0 n n k λ n k H k ( j ) Y x , y ; λ c n k = k = 0 n d = 0 n k v = 0 d n k n k d λ d H k j x , y Y n k d λ S 1 d , v v + 1 .
Proof. 
By using (16) and (2), we obtain
Y n w ; λ = d = 0 n n d λ d Y n d λ v = 0 d S 1 d , v w v .
Integrating both sides of the above equation with respect to w from 0 to 1, we obtain
0 1 Y n w ; λ d w = d = 0 n n d λ d Y n d λ v = 0 d S 1 d , v 1 v + 1 .
Substituting (21) into (18), after some calculations, we obtain
k = 0 n n k λ n k H k ( j ) Y x , y ; λ c n k = k = 0 n d = 0 n k v = 0 d n k n k d λ d v + 1 H k j x , y Y n k d λ S 1 d , v .
Thus, the proof of the theorem is concluded. □
Combining (20) with (12), we obtain the following corollary:
Corollary 1.
Let n N 0 . Then, we obtain
k = 0 n n k λ n k H k ( j ) Y x , y ; λ c n k = k = 0 n d = 0 n k v = 0 d n k n k d 2 n k + 1 v + 1 λ 2 d H k j x , y S 1 d , v Y n k d , 2 λ .

3. Derivative Formulas for the Hermite-Type Combinatorial Simsek Polynomials

In this section, by applying derivative operator to the generating functions of the Hermite-type combinatorial Simsek polynomials, we obtain some partial differential equations (PDEs). Using these equations, we obtain some formulas, including the Stirling numbers of the first kind, the Peters-type Simsek numbers of the first kind, and the Hermite-based Peters-type Simsek polynomials.
Theorem 5.
Let n N with n j 1 . Then, we have
H n + 1 Y x , y , w ; λ , j = w k = 0 n n k n k ! 1 n k λ n + 1 k H k Y x , y , w ; λ , j λ 2 2 k = 0 n n k Y k λ H n k Y x , y , w ; λ , j + y n j 1 j ! H n j + 1 Y x , y , w ; λ , j + x H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j .
Proof. 
By applying a derivative operator to (14), we obtain the following functional equation:
t H 2 t ; x , y , w ; λ , j = f H ( t ; x , y , j ) t F t ; w , λ + F t ; w , λ t f H ( t ; x , y , j ) .
From the above partial differential equations (PDEs), we obtain
t H 2 t ; x , y , w ; λ , j = f H ( t ; x , y , j ) F t ; w , λ λ w 1 + λ t λ 2 2 F t ; λ + F t ; w , λ f H ( t ; x , y , j ) j y t j 1 + x .
Combining the above equation with (3), (6) and (7), we obtain the following functions:
n = 0 H n + 1 Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! = 2 1 + λ t w e x t + y t j λ ( 1 + λ t ) 1 λ w 1 + λ t 2 λ 2 λ ( 1 + λ t ) 1 + j y t j 1 + x 2 1 + λ t w e x t + y t j λ ( 1 + λ t ) 1 .
Thus,
n = 0 H n + 1 Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! = n = 0 H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! λ w 1 + λ t λ 2 2 n = 0 Y n λ t n n ! + j y t j 1 + x n = 0 H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! .
After some calculations, we obtain
n = 0 H n + 1 Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! = w n = 0 k = 0 n n k n k ! 1 n k λ n + 1 k H k Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! λ 2 2 n = 0 k = 0 n n k Y k λ H n k Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! + j y n = 0 n j 1 H n j + 1 Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! + x n = 0 H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! .
By comparing the coefficients of t n n ! on both sides of the above equation, we achieve the desired result. □
Theorem 6.
Let n N with n j 1 . Then, we have
H n + 1 Y x , y , w ; λ , j = w d = 0 n n d k = 0 d 1 k d k d k ! λ k + 1 Y d k w ; λ H n d ( j ) x , y λ 2 2 k = 0 n n k H n k ( j ) x , y Y k 2 w ; λ + x k = 0 n n k Y n k w ; λ H k ( j ) x , y + y n j 1 j ! k = 0 n j + 1 n j + 1 k Y n j + 1 k w ; λ H k ( j ) x , y .
Proof. 
By using (22), we also obtain
n = 0 H n + 1 Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! = e x t + y t j 2 λ w 1 + λ t w 1 λ ( 1 + λ t ) 1 e x t + y t j λ 2 2 2 λ ( 1 + λ t ) 1 2 1 + λ t w + j y t j 1 + x 2 1 + λ t w λ ( 1 + λ t ) 1 e x t + y t j .
Combining the above equation with (3), (7) and (9), after some calculations, we obtain
n = 0 H n + 1 Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! = λ w n = 0 H n ( j ) x , y t n n ! n = 0 λ n t n n = 0 Y n w ; λ t n n ! λ 2 2 n = 0 H n ( j ) x , y t n n ! n = 0 Y n 2 w ; λ t n n ! + j y t j 1 n = 0 Y n w ; λ t n n ! n = 0 H n ( j ) x , y t n n ! + x n = 0 Y n w ; λ t n n ! n = 0 H n ( j ) x , y t n n ! .
Therefore,
n = 0 H n + 1 Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! = w n = 0 d = 0 n n d k = 0 d 1 k d k d k ! λ k + 1 Y d k w ; λ H n d ( j ) x , y t n n ! λ 2 2 n = 0 k = 0 n n k H n k ( j ) x , y Y k 2 w ; λ t n n ! + j y n = 0 n j 1 k = 0 n j + 1 n j + 1 k Y n j + 1 k w ; λ H k ( j ) x , y t n n ! + x n = 0 k = 0 n n k Y n k w ; λ H k ( j ) x , y t n n ! .
By comparing the coefficients of t n n ! on both sides of the above equation, we achieve the desired result. □
Theorem 7.
Let n N with n k . Then, we have
k x k H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j = n k H n k Y x , y , w ; λ , j .
Proof. 
By applying the derivative operator k x k to Equation (14), we obtain
n = 0 k x k H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! = t k n = 0 H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! .
Thus,
n = 0 k x k H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! = n = 0 n k H n k Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! .
By comparing the coefficients of t n n ! on both sides of the above equation, we achieve the desired result. □
Putting k = 1 in (23), we obtain the following corollary:
Corollary 2.
Let n N with n 1 . Then, we have
x H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j = n H n 1 Y x , y , w ; λ , j .
Theorem 8.
Let n N with n j k . Then, we have
k y k H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j = n j k H n j k Y x , y , w ; λ , j .
Proof. 
By applying the derivative operator k y k to Equation (14), we obtain
n = 0 k y k H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! = n = 0 H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n + j k n ! .
Hence,
n = 0 k y k H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! = n = 0 n j k H n j k Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! .
By comparing the coefficients of t n n ! on both sides of the above equation, we arrive at the desired result. □
Putting k = 1 in (24), we obtain the following corollary:
Corollary 3.
Let n N with n j . Then, we have
y H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j = n j H n j Y x , y , w ; λ , j .
Theorem 9.
Let n N 0 . Then, we have
2 x 2 H n Y x , y , w ; λ , 2 = y H n Y x , y , w ; λ , 2 .
Proof. 
When j = 2 in (14), upon applying the derivative operators 2 x 2 and y to the final equation, we obtain
n = 0 2 x 2 H n Y x , y , w ; λ , 2 t n n ! = n = 0 n 2 H n 2 Y x , y , w ; λ , 2 t n n !
and
n = 0 y H n Y x , y , w ; λ , 2 t n n ! = n = 0 n 2 H n 2 Y x , y , w ; λ , 2 t n n ! .
From the above equations, we have
n = 0 y H n Y x , y , w ; λ , 2 t n n ! = n = 0 2 x 2 H n Y x , y , w ; λ , 2 t n n ! .
By comparing the coefficients of t n n ! on both sides of the above equation, we arrive at the desired result. □
Theorem 10.
Let n N 0 and k N . Then, we have
k w k H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j = k ! d = 0 n n d λ d S 1 d , k H n d Y x , y , w ; λ , j .
Proof. 
By applying the derivative operator k w k to Equation (14), we obtain
n = 0 k w k H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! = log 1 + λ t k n = 0 H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! .
Combining the above equation with (1), we obtain
n = 0 k w k H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! = k ! n = 0 λ n S 1 n , k t n n ! n = 0 H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! .
Therefore,
n = 0 k w k H n Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! = k ! n = 0 d = 0 n n d λ d S 1 d , k H n d Y x , y , w ; λ , j t n n ! .
By comparing the coefficients of t n n ! on both sides of the above equation, we arrive at the desired result. □

4. Conclusions

In the present paper, we examined the generating functions of Hermite-based Peters-type Simsek polynomials. Using the differential, integral, and functional equations of the generating functions, we obtained some formulas and identities for the Hermite-type combinatorial Simsek polynomials, including some special numbers and polynomials. These results include the Cauchy numbers, the Peters-type Simsek numbers of the first and second kinds, the Peters-type Simsek polynomials of the first kind, the two-variable Hermite polynomials, and the Stirling numbers of the first kind. Moreover, we established a partial differential equation (PDE) for these polynomials. In summary, this paper provides a valuable resource for those researching the Peters-type Simsek polynomials and the Hermite polynomials, and also their derivative and integral properties. Moreover, there are many applications for these types of polynomials. For example, their quasimonomial properties, matrix properties, binomial distribution, and Poisson distribution have been studied by many authors (see [12,13,14,15,20,21,22,26]). Consequently, the findings of this paper have the potential to contribute to and enrich many disciplines, especially mathematics fields such as combinatorics, number theory, probability theory, and differential equations.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank the referees for their valuable comments on the present paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gould, H.W.; Hopper, A.T. Operational formulas connected with two generalizations of Hermite polynomials. Duke Math. J. 1962, 29, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dattoli, G. Generalized polynomials, operational identities and their applications. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2000, 118, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bayad, A.; Simsek, Y.; Srivastava, H.M. Some array type polynomials associated with special numbers and polynomials. Appl. Math. Comput. 2014, 244, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dere, R.; Simsek, Y. Hermite base Bernoulli type polynomials on the umbral analysis. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 2015, 22, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gun, D. Relations among trigonometric functions, Apostol-type numbers and Peters-type Simsek polynomials. Montes Taurus J. Pure Appl. Math. 2023, 5, 90–101. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gun, D.; Simsek, Y. Formulas associated with combinatorial polynomials and two parametric Apostol-type polynomials. AIP Conf. Proc. 2020, 2293, 180007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kilar, N. Building generating functions for degenerate Simsek-type numbers and polynomials of higher order. Montes Taurus J. Pure Appl. Math. 2024, 6, 186–198. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kilar, N.; Simsek, Y. A special approach to derive new formulas for some special numbers and polynomials. Turk. J. Math. 2020, 44, 2217–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kilar, N.; Simsek, Y. Computational formulas and identities for new classes of Hermite-based Milne-Thomson type polynomials: Analysis of generating functions with Euler’s formula. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2021, 44, 6731–6762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kim, D.S.; Kim, T. A note on Boole polynomials. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 2014, 25, 627–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, D.S.; Kim, T.; Rim, S.H.; Lee, S.H. Hermite polynomials and their applications associated with Bernoulli and Euler numbers. Discret. Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2012, 2012, 974632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Khan, S.; Al-Saad, M.W.; Yasmin, G. Some properties of Hermite-based Sheffer polynomials. Appl. Math. Comput. 2010, 217, 2169–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Khan, S.; Nahid, T.; Riyasat, M. Partial derivative formulas and identities involving 2-variable Simsek polynomials. Bol. Soc. Mat. Mex. 2020, 26, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Khan, S.; Nahid, T.; Riyasat, M. Properties and graphical representations of the 2-variable form of the Simsek polynomials. Vietnam J. Math. 2022, 50, 95–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kucukoglu, I. Identities for the multiparametric higher-order Hermite-based Peters-type Simsek polynomials of the first kind. Montes Taurus J. Pure Appl. Math. 2023, 5, 102–123. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kucukoglu, I. Unification of the generating functions for Sheffer type sequences and their applications. Montes Taurus J. Pure Appl. Math. 2023, 5, 71–88. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kucukoglu, I.; Simsek, Y. On a family of special numbers and polynomials associated with Apostol-type numbers and polynomials and combinatorial numbers. Appl. Anal. Discret. Math. 2019, 13, 478–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kucukoglu, I.; Simsek, Y. Computational identities for extensions of some families of special numbers and polynomials. Turk. J. Math. 2021, 45, 2341–2365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kucukoglu, I.; Simsek, Y. New formulas and numbers arising from analyzing combinatorial numbers and polynomials. Montes Taurus J. Pure Appl. Math. 2021, 3, 238–259. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kucukoglu, I.; Simsek, Y. Matrix representations for a certain class of combinatorial numbers associated with Bernstein basis functions and cyclic derangements and their probabilistic and asymptotic analyses. Appl. Anal. Discret. Math. 2021, 15, 045–068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kucukoglu, I.; Simsek, B.; Simsek, Y. An approach to negative hypergeometric distribution by generating function for special numbers and polynomials. Turk. J. Math. 2019, 43, 2337–2353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kucukoglu, I.; Simsek, B.; Simsek, Y. Generating functions for new families of combinatorial numbers and polynomials: Approach to Poisson–Charlier polynomials and probability distribution function. Axioms 2019, 8, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Simsek, Y. Generating functions for generalized Stirling type numbers, array type polynomials, Eulerian type polynomials and their alications. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2013, 2013, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Simsek, Y. Identities associated with generalized Stirling type numbers and Eulerian type polynomials. Math. Comput. Appl. 2013, 18, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Simsek, Y. Analysis of the p-adic q-Volkenborn integrals: An approach to generalized Apostol-type special numbers and polynomials and their applications. Cogent Math. 2016, 3, 1269393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Simsek, Y. Construction of some new families of Apostol-type numbers and polynomials via Dirichlet character and p-adic q-integrals. Turk. J. Math. 2018, 42, 557–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Simsek, Y. Remarks and some formulas associated with combinatorial numbers. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019, 2116, 100002. [Google Scholar]
  28. Simsek, Y. Formulas for Poisson–Charlier, Hermite, Milne-Thomson and other type polynomials by their generating functions and p-adic integral approach. Rev. Real Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fis. Nat. Ser. A Mat. RACSAM 2019, 113, 931–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Simsek, Y. Peters type polynomials and numbers and their generating functions: Approach with p-adic integral method. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2019, 42, 7030–7046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Simsek, Y. On Boole-type combinatorial numbers and polynomials. Filomat 2020, 34, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Simsek, Y. A new family of combinatorial numbers and polynomials associated with Peters numbers and polynomials. Appl. Anal. Discret. Math. 2020, 14, 627–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Simsek, Y.; Kucukoglu, I. Some certain classes of combinatorial numbers and polynomials attached to Dirichlet characters: Their construction by p-adic integration and applications to probability distribution functions. In Mathematical Analysis in Interdisciplinary Research; Parasidis, I.N., Providas, E., Rassias, T.M., Eds.; Springer Optimization and Its Applications; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; Volume 179, pp. 795–857. [Google Scholar]
  33. Simsek, Y.; So, J.S. On generating functions for Boole type polynomials and numbers of higher order and their applications. Symmetry 2019, 11, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Srivastava, H.M.; Choi, J. Zeta and q-Zeta Functions and Associated Series and Integrals; Elseveir: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  35. Srivastava, H.M.; Kucukoglu, I.; Simsek, Y. Partial differential equations for a new family of numbers and polynomials unifying the Apostol-type numbers and the Apostol-type polynomials. J. Number Theory 2017, 181, 117–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yuluklu, E. On the Hermite base Apostol-Euler type polynomials and numbers. AIP Conf. Proc. 2018, 1978, 040005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yuluklu, E. A note on the Milne-Thomson type polynomials. AIP Conf. Proc. 2018, 1978, 040004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yuluklu, E. Identities for Hermite base combinatorial polynomials and numbers. AIP Conf. Proc. 2020, 2293, 180015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yuluklu, E. A note on Hermite base combinatorial polynomials and numbers. In Proceedings of the 13th Symposium on Generating Functions of Special Numbers and Polynomials and their Applications (GFSNP 2023), Antalya, Turkey, 11–13 March 2023; pp. 175–177, ISBN 978-625-00-1128-7. [Google Scholar]
  40. Yuluklu, E.; Simsek, Y.; Komatsu, T. Identities related to special polynomials and combinatorial numbers. Filomat 2017, 31, 4833–4844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ayman-Mursaleen, M.; Heshamuddin, M.; Rao, N.; Sinha, B.K.; Yadav, A.K. Hermite polynomials linking Szász–Durrmeyer operators. Comput. Appl. Math. 2024, 43, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rao, N.; Avinash Kumar Yadav, A.K.; Mursaleen, M.; Sinha, B.K.; Jha, N.K. Szász-Beta operators via Hermite polynomial. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2024, 36, 103120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Comtet, L. Advanced Combinatorics; D. Reidel Publishing Company: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  44. Jordan, C. Calculus of Finite Differences, 2nd ed.; Chelsea Publishing Company: New York, NY, USA, 1950. [Google Scholar]
  45. Roman, S. The Umbral Calculus; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  46. Appell, P.; De Fériet, J.K. Fonctions Hypergeométriques et Hypersphériques: Polynomes d’Hermite; Gauthier-Villars: Paris, France, 1926. [Google Scholar]
  47. Yuluklu, E. Series representation for Milne-Thomson type polynomials with approach of Mellin transformation. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019, 2116, 100013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Merlini, D.; Sprugnoli, R.; Verri, M.C. The Cauchy numbers. Discret. Math. 2006, 306, 1906–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yuluklu, E. Partial Derivative Equations and Identities for Hermite-Based Peters-Type Simsek Polynomials and Their Applications. Mathematics 2024, 12, 2505. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12162505

AMA Style

Yuluklu E. Partial Derivative Equations and Identities for Hermite-Based Peters-Type Simsek Polynomials and Their Applications. Mathematics. 2024; 12(16):2505. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12162505

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yuluklu, Eda. 2024. "Partial Derivative Equations and Identities for Hermite-Based Peters-Type Simsek Polynomials and Their Applications" Mathematics 12, no. 16: 2505. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12162505

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop