1. Introduction
The trinomial coefficient
is given by
where
denotes the coefficient of
in the polynomial
. According to Ref. [
1], the trinomial coefficients had been investigated by Euler. Define the central trinomial coefficient as
i.e.,
. It is not difficult to prove that
where
and
Furthermore,
satisfies the recurrence relation
The generating function of
is
In Ref. [
2], Liang, Wang, and Wang considered the polynomial
Clearly
. Liang, Wang and Wang [
2] proved that all the zeros of
are real, and the zeros of
are interlaced with the zeros of
and
. Using the Aissen–Schoenberg–Whitney theorem and the Schoenberg–Edrei theorem, they also proved that the numbers
are asymptotically normal with the mean
and the variance
.
Motivated by (
1), we define the
r-order central trinomial coefficient
by
Then,
. As we shall see soon, when
,
where
We define
Thus,
. In this paper, we investigate the zeros of
.
Theorem 1. All zeros of the polynomials are real, and the zeros of are interlaced with the zeros of and .
Furthermore, we define the generalized central trinomial coefficient
by
Clearly,
. It can be shown that
and
satisfy the recurrence relation
with
and
The generating function of
is
Some properties of
have been studied by Liang, Wang, and Wang in [
2].
We define the generalized
r-order central trinomial coefficient
by
As we shall see later, when
,
With the help of
, we can prove that
Theorem 2. The sequence is asymptotically normal with the mean valueand the variance Remark 1. In Ref. [3], Andrews and Baxter found that some q-analogues of trinomial coefficients play an important role in the hard hexagon model. For example, a q-analogue of the central trinomial coefficient ([3], Equation (2.7)) iswhere denotes the q-binomial coefficient. Motivated by the work of Andrews and Baxter, we believe that some q-analogue of the second-order central trinomial coefficient would have some applications in physics. 2. Zeros of
Lemma 1. The generalized second-order central trinomial coefficient satisfies the recurrence relationwith and . Proof of Lemma 1. Based on the generating function of the generalized second-order central trinomial coefficients
differentiating both sides yields
Thus, we obtain that
□
In light of the generating function of , its relation to recurrence can be easily derived. However, the crux lies in determining the explicit expression for the coefficient of , which requires substantial computation. In the following, we present two approaches for obtaining the expression for coefficient . The first method employs Taylor series expansion, a conventional technique that involves relatively less computation but is more intricate. The second method adopts mathematical induction, which is more intuitive, but computationally more intensive.
Lemma 2. The coefficients of the generalized second-order central trinomial equation are Proof of Lemma 2. To prove this lemma, we show two different methods that establish this result. On the one hand, the lemma can be proved using Taylor series expansion. However, using inductive assumptions also provides a valid proof.
Method 1: Let
and
.
Then, , .
The coefficient of
in the Taylor expansion [
4] of
is
Thus,
Using formula [
5]
we can obtain
Method 2: For
, applying Lemma 1 yields the following:
To prove Lemma 2, we will divide n into odd and even cases for the sake of our discussion.
Assuming that
is even, we have
where
Similarly, if
is odd, then we have
where
For odd
, the equations of (4) and (6) are preserved. Notably, the behavior at
and
is consistent across both cases of parity of
n.
(i) It follows from the Equation (
4) that
Clearly,
since
Since
It follows that
.
(iii) Substituting
into Equation (
7) gives the following:
For the special case when , we have .
therefore,
So
Using mathematical induction on
k, we shall prove that
(1) When
, we have
Due to
i.e.,
.
Using the formula
we obtain the following:
(2) When
, we have
Because of
it follows that
Hence,
(3) We conjecture that the quantity
admits the following explicit expression:
Under the assumption that this formula holds for all cases where
, we now proceed to rigorously prove the following:
□
Let
be a real-rooted polynomial, that is, a real polynomial with only real roots. Denote by
the roots of
f sorted in non-increasing order as follows:
. Let
h,
g be two real-rooted polynomials and
. We say that
g interlaces
h, denoted by
, if
If all inequalities in
are strict, then we say that
g strictly binds to
h and denote it by
. For notational convenience, we say that a real number
a is real rooted and
for
a,
, and
[
2]. If
and
, then
h is said to be interlaced between
and
.
Proof of Theorem 1. By mathematical induction in n, when , ; when , we have ; when , we have ; and when , we have . Obviously, for , the conclusions of Theorem 1 are true. We assume that both and have real roots, and , to prove that has real roots and .
Denote by
the sign of a real number t, i.e.,
Let
be the real roots of
, and let
be the real roots of
. Then,
are the real roots of
. When
, for
, then we have
Therefore,
.
According to the zero-point existence theorem, it can be inferred that has at least zeros. But has no more zeros. And virtual roots appear in pairs, so the roots of are all real.
As
, we have
. And
. Let
, then
Therefore, . Thus,
Next, we prove that . When , according to , we have . Let , then . So . Therefore, . □
3. Asymptotic Normality of
The real roots of polynomials with nonnegative coefficients are closely related to totally positive matrices. Following Karlin, we say that a matrix
A (finite or infinite) is a total positive of order
r (denoted by
) if all its minors of orders
are nonnegative. It is called totally positive (
) if all minors of all orders are non-negative. Let
be a sequence of nonnegative numbers (finite sequences are implicitly extended to infinite by zero-padding). We say that the sequence is a Pólya frequency (
for short) sequence if the corresponding infinite Toeplitz matrix
is
. The following is a fundamental characterization for
sequences [
2].
Lemma 3 (Schoeber–Edrei Theorem [
2]).
A sequence is if and only if its generating function isHere, Theorem 3. The matrix is .
Proof of Theorem 3. According to Lemma (3),
is
, since
So the Toeplitz matrix
is
. Therefore, the submatrix
is
, which consists of even columns of the Toeplitz matrix.
As
is
, the sequences
are
. So, the matrix
is
. □
Lemma 4. Suppose that has only real roots, where . Let and . If , then the numbers are asymptotically normal with mean and variance .
Proof of Theorem 2. By Lemma (4), we need to show that
.
Let
then
Let .
The equation
is a quadratic equation, where
So has two different roots.
There exists a root
, such that
Then,
. But
So
has a real root, that is
.
Hence, sequence
increases monotonically. But
, then
. Thus, sequence
is convergent. As
, we can obtain that
Therefore,
On the other hand,
Hence,
and
Since
we can obtain
Thus,
, as required. □
4. Conclusions
This paper investigates the analytic properties of generalized second-order central trinomial coefficients . Our main contributions are as follows.
- 1.
Real zeros and interlacing properties (Theorem 1): For the polynomial
we prove the following:
- 2.
Asymptotic normality (Theorem 2): The coefficients
are asymptotically normal with
The paper develops these results through the following:
The explicit expression for the generalized second-order central trinomial coefficients is given by two different methods.
- –
Generating function approach: Taylor series expansion of
- –
Mathematical induction on the recurrence relation: Perform induction on k for .
Based on this, we investigate the zeros of the generalized second-order central trinomial polynomial using the Intermediate Value Theorem and to prove Theorem 1.
Section 3: Asymptotic normality of
Starting from the real zeros of the generalized second-order centered trinomial polynomial, we investigate whether the variance tends to , thereby proving that the generalized second-order centered trinomial numbers are asymptotically normal, and we determine their mean and variance .
Contributions and Extensions
Our work generalizes Liang, Wang, and Wang’s (2023) [
2] results on classical trinomial coefficients
to the second-order case. Future directions include the following:
Combinatorics: Extension to higher-order coefficients for .
Physics: The potential q-analogue of may provide insights into hard-core lattice models and quantum spin chains with higher-order interactions.