1. Introduction
As in [
1,
2,
3] we consider the following one-phase nonlinear unidimensional Stefan problem for a semi-infinite material
with phase change temperature
where the positive constant,
α, is
L is the latent heat of fusion of the medium and
ρ is the density (assumed constant). The partial differential equation of heat conduction is a nonlinear equation when the temperature dependence of the thermal parameters is taken into account. We assume that the metal exhibits nonlinear thermal characteristics, such that the heat capacity,
, and the thermal conductivity,
,satisfy a Storm’s condition [
4,
5,
6,
7,
8]:
where
. Condition (6) was originally obtained by [
8] in an investigation of heat conduction in simple monoatomic metals. In that paper, it was shown that if this condition is satisfied, then the partial differential equation of the heat conduction can be transformed to the linear form. There, the validity of the approximation (6) was examined for aluminum, silver, sodium, cadmium, zinc, copper and lead.
In [
7], the free boundary problems (1)–(5) (fusion case) for the particular case
and
constant was studied. The explicit solution of this problem was obtained through the unique solution of an integral equation with time as a parameter. A similar case with the constant temperature at the fixed face
was also studied.
The goal of this paper is to determine the temperature and the position of the phase change boundary at time t, , which satisfy the problems (1)–(5). In the section after, we show how to find a parametric solution for this problem.
In
Section 3, we consider the free boundary problems (1), (3)–(5) and a temperature boundary condition
at the fixed face
instead of the heat flux condition (2). We improve [
1], obtaining the explicit solution and showing the existence and uniqueness of this type of solution in both cases in which only numerical results for the case with a temperature boundary condition at the fixed face
were presented in that work.
We also give procedures in order to compute the explicit solution in both cases.
In
Section 4, we prove the equivalence of the two free boundary problems: the first with the Neumann boundary condition (2) is considered in
Section 2, and the second one with the Dirichlet constant boundary condition (44) is considered in
Section 3.
2. Solution to the Stefan Problem with the Heat Flux Condition on the Fixed Face
We consider the problems (1)–(5), and we propose a similarity type solution given by [
1,
9]:
where:
is the free boundary and
is assumed a positive constant to be determined.
Then, we have that the problems (1)–(5) are equivalent to:
If we define:
then a parametrization of the Storm condition is:
Then, we have that the following problem is equivalent to Equations (9)–(12):
Lemma 1.
A parametric solution to the problems (15)–(18) is given by:for:where and are the parameter values, which verify that and The unknowns, and , must verify the following system of equations: Proof.
A parametric solution of Equation (15) was deduced in [
1], and it is given by:
where
and
are integration constants to be determined.
We choose
and
to be such that
and
; we obtain that:
Then, we have that:
and:
is a parametric solution to Equations (15)–(18).
Next, we prove that the unknowns,
and
, must satisfy Equations (21)–(23). From Equations (28) and (29), we have:
Then:
and from Equation (16), we have Equation (21).
Analogously, we have:
and by Equation (17), we have:
that is, Equation (22).
Last, we have:
and taking into account Equation (18), we obtain Equation (23). The Lemma 1 is proven.
Next, we want to find
and
, the solutions to Equations (21)–(23). Obviously, the solution
is determined by Equation (21). To obtain
and
γ, previously, we define the family of functions
for
with
given by:
where [
4]:
and:
Now, the system of Equations (22)–(23) can be expressed as follows:
Lemma 2.
For each , the function satisfies the following properties: Lemma 3.
The system of Equations (22)–(23) has a unique solution , where satisfies:and γ is given by: Proof: From the properties of function , it is easy to see that Equation (42) has a unique solution, The unknown is determined by Equation (43). Lemma 3 is proven.
Summarizing, we can enunciate the following theorem.
Theorem 4.
The problems (1)–(5) have a unique solution of a similarity type.
Now, we give a procedure in order to compute the explicit solution. Fixing the data,
and
, of the problems (1)–(5), to obtain the free boundary,
, and the temperature,
, for
, we follow the following process:
- (i)
We obtain the unique solutions, and , of Equations (21)–(23).
- (ii)
For
, we compute:
and for each
, we obtain:
- (iii)
Taking into account that
is an increasing function, we determine:
where
and
are given by Equations (28) and (29).
- (iv)
We have:
where
is the inverse function of the function,
, which is an increasing function by the condition (6).
- (v)
We obtain the temperature:
3. Solution to the Stefan Problem with a Temperature Boundary Condition on the Fixed Face
In this section, we will prove the existence and uniqueness of the solution to the problems (1), (3)–(6) and the temperature boundary condition at the fixed face
given by:
We define the same transformations, (7), (8), (13) and (14), as was done for the problem in the previous section. We obtain an equivalent problem given by Equations (15), (17), (18) and:
Remark 1. Assumption (6) enables one to deduce that
Lemma 5.
A parametric solution to the problems (15), (17), (18) and (45) is given by Equations (19) and (20), where the unknown and must satisfy the following system of equations:where was defined in Equation (35). Proof: Proceeding as in the previous section, we determine a parametric solution of Equation (15) given by Equations (28) and (29).
Next, we prove that the unknowns,
and
, must satisfy Equations (46)–(48). From Equations (19), (20) and (30), we have:
Then, for
, we have:
and taking into account Equation (17), we obtain:
that is, Equation (47).
From Equations (18) and (29), it is easy to see that Equation (46) is obtained.
Finally, from Equations (29) and (45), we have Equation (48).
Lemma 5 is proven.
Lemma 6.
The system of Equations (46)–(48) has a unique solution, and
Proof.
In order to solve the system of Equations (46)–(48), first, we replace the expression of
given by Equation (47) in Equations (46) and (48); we get:
By using Lemma 2, for each , we have that there exists a unique solution to Equation (53).
If we define:
where
(see Remark 1), then the Equation (52) can be rewritten as
Taking into account that this functions satisfy the following properties [
4]:
Equation (54) admits a unique solution
Therefore, the system of Equations (46)–(48) has a unique solution and . Lemma 6 is proven.
Remark 2. The solution of Equation (54) verifies ,
where:
Finally, we have the following theorem as before:
Theorem 7.
The problems The problems (1), (3)–(5) and (44) have a unique solution of a similarity type .
Next, we give a procedure similar to that given in the previous section to compute the solution of the problems (1), (3)–(5) and (44).
Fixing the data
and
in order to obtain the free boundary,
, and the temperature,
, for
, we can follow the following process:
- (i)
We obtain the unique solutions, and , of Equations (46)–(48).
- (ii)
For
we compute:
and for each
, we obtain:
- (iii)
We determine:
where
and
are given by Equations (28)–(29).
- (iv)
We have
where
is the inverse function of the function,
- (v)
We obtain the temperature:
4. Equivalence of the Two Free Boundary Problems
We consider the solution,
, of the problems (1), (3)–(5) and (44), given by Equation (55);
is the free boundary,
and
are given by Equations (28) and (29) with
and
the unique solutions to Equations (46)–(48). We compute:
and we have:
from Equation (6), and the definition of function
P results:
Then, we have:
This is:
meaning that the heat flux at the fixed face
is of the type
If we replace
by
in the condition (2) and we solve the problems (1)–(5), we obtain the solution:
where
and
are given by:
and
,
are the solutions of the following system:
Next, we prove that and which are the solutions of Equations (46)–(48).
From Equation (64) and the definition of
, we obtain
By Equations (47)–(48), we have that
and
satisfy:
which is equivalent to:
Therefore, we have that
is the solution of Equation (65); then
Finally, we have that Equation (65) is equivalent to:
and by using Equation (68), we obtain
.
Then, and forall and
5. Conclusions
Two one-phase nonlinear, one-dimensional Stefan problems for a semi-infinite material with phase change temperature have been considered with the assumption of a Storm’s condition for the heat capacity and thermal conductivity. In one of them, a heat flux boundary condition of the type has been considered, and in the other problem, a temperature boundary condition at the fixed face has been studied. The existence and uniqueness of solutions of a similarity type has been obtained in both cases. Furthermore, the procedures to compute the solutions are given. Finally, the equivalence of two problems is proven.
Acknowledgments
This paper has been partially sponsored by the Project PIPNo. 112-200801-00460 “Inecuaciones Variacionales y Problemas de Frontera Libre para la Ecuación del Calor-Difusión”, from CONICET-UA, Rosario-Argentina and Proyect: Ecuaciones a derivadas parciales, inecuaciones variacionales, control óptimo y aplicaciones, Universidad Austral Rosario, Argentina.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Hill, J.M.; Hart, V.G. The Stefan problem in nonlinear heat conduction. J. Appl. Math. Phys. (ZAMP) 1986, 37, 206–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Solomon, A.D.; Wilson, D.G.; Alexiades, V. Explicit solutions to phase change problems. Q. Appl. Math. 1983, 51, 237–243. [Google Scholar]
- Tarzia, D.A. An inequality for the coefficient σ of the free boundary of the Neumann solution for the two-phase Stefan problem. Q. Appl. Math. 1981, 39, 491–497. [Google Scholar]
- Briozzo, A.C.; Natale, M.F.; Tarzia, D.A. Determination of unknown thermal coefficients for Storm’s type materials through a phase-change process. Int. J. Nonlinear Mech. 1999, 34, 329–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knight, J.H.; Philip, J.R. Exact solution in nonlinear diffusion. J. Eng. Math. 1974, 8, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Natale, M.F.; Tarzia, D.A. Explicit solutions to the two-phase Stefan problem for Storm’s type materials. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 2000, 37, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Natale, M.F.; Tarzia, D.A. Explicit solution for a one-phase Stefan problem with temperature-dependent thermal conductivity. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 2003, 41, 1685–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Storm, M.L. Heat conduction in simple metals. J. Appl. Phys. 1951, 22, 940–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carslaw, H.S.; Jaeger, J.C. Conduction of Heat in Solids; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1965. [Google Scholar]
© 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).