Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Information
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Basic Concepts
2.1. Pythagorean Fuzzy Set (PFS)
- (1)
- If , then ;
- (2)
- If , then,
- (i)
- If , then ;
- (ii)
- If , then .
2.2. Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Set (IVPFS)
- (1)
- if , then
- (2)
- if , then,
- (i)
- if , then .
- (ii)
- if , then .
2.3. HM Operator
- (i)
- when
- (ii)
- when
- (iii)
- when
- (1)
- when , , it becomes the arithmetic mean operator.
- (2)
- when , , it becomes the arithmetic mean operator.Which is the arithmetic averaging operator.
3. Certain HM and DHM Operators with IVPFNs
3.1. IVPFHM Operator
- If and then
- If and then
- If and then
- If and then
3.2. IVPFWHM Operator
3.3. IVPFDHM Operator
3.4. IVPFWDHM Operator
4. Models for MADM with IVPFNs
5. Numerical Example and Comparative Analysis
5.1. Numerical Example
- Step 1.
- Step 2.
5.2. Influence of the Parameter on the Final Result
5.3. Comparative Analysis
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Atanassov, K.T. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1986, 20, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zadeh, L.A. Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 1965, 8, 338–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xu, Z.S. Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 2007, 15, 1179–1187. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Z.S.; Yager, R.R. Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 2006, 35, 417–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, S.P.; Wang, F.; Dong, J.Y. A novel risk attitudinal ranking method for intuitionistic fuzzy values and application to MADM. Appl. Soft Comput. 2016, 40, 98–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, G.W. Some geometric aggregation functions and their application to dynamic multiple attribute decision making in intuitionistic fuzzy setting. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzzy Knowl.-Based Syst. 2009, 17, 179–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, G.W. GRA method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information in intuitionistic fuzzy setting. Knowl. Based Syst. 2010, 23, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, G.W. Some induced geometric aggregation operators with intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to group decision making. Appl. Soft Comput. 2010, 10, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, G.W.; Wang, H.J.; Lin, R. Application of correlation coefficient to interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making with incomplete weight information. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 2011, 26, 337–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nancy, H.G. Novel single-valued neutrosophic decision making operators under frank norm operations and its application. Int. J. Uncertain. Quantif. 2016, 6, 361–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, K.; Garg, H. TOPSIS method based on the connection number of set pair analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set environment. Comput. Appl. Math. 2016, 37, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garg, H. Distance and similarity measure for intuitionistic multiplicative preference relation and its application. Int. J. Uncertain. Quantif. 2017, 7, 117–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garg, H. Some picture fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multicriteria decision-making. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2017, 42, 5275–5290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garg, H. A new generalized improved score function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and applications in expert systems. Appl. Soft Comput. 2016, 38, 988–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, G.W. Approaches to interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 2015, 17, 484–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, X.F.; Wei, G.W. Some Intuitionistic Fuzzy Einstein Hybrid Aggregation Operators and Their Application to Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2013, 37, 472–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garg, H. Generalized intuitionistic fuzzy interactive geometric interaction operators using Einstein t-norm and t-conorm and their application to decision making. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2016, 101, 53–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yager, R.R. Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. In Proceedings of the Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 24–28 June 2013; pp. 57–61. [Google Scholar]
- Yager, R.R. Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 2014, 22, 958–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.L.; Xu, Z.S. Extension of TOPSIS to multi-criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2014, 29, 1061–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.L. A novel approach based on similarity measure for Pythagorean fuzzy multiple criteria group decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2016, 31, 593–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, X.; Yang, Y. Some results for Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2015, 30, 1133–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reformat, M.Z.; Yager, R.R. Suggesting Recommendations Using Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets Illustrated Using Netflix Movie Data; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 546–556. [Google Scholar]
- Zeng, S.; Chen, J.; Li, X. A hybrid method for Pythagorean fuzzy multiple-criteria decision making. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 2016, 15, 403–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garg, H. A new generalized Pythagorean fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations and its application to decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2016, 31, 886–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garg, H. Generalized Pythagorean fuzzy geometric aggregation operators using Einstein t-norm and t-conorm for multicriteria decision-making process. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2017, 32, 597–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X. Multicriteria Pythagorean fuzzy decision analysis: A hierarchical QUALIFLEX approach with the closeness index-based ranking. Inf. Sci. 2016, 330, 104–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garg, H. A novel accuracy function under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment for solving multicriteria decision making problem. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2016, 31, 529–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garg, H. A novel correlation coefficients between Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its applications to decision-making processes. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2016, 31, 1234–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garg, H. A novel improved accuracy function for interval valued Pythagorean fuzzy sets and its applications in decision making process. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2017, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garg, H. A new improved score function of an interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy set based TOPSIS method. Int. J. Uncertain. Quantif. 2017, 7, 463–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garg, H. Confidence levels based Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators and its application to decision-making process. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 2017, 23, 546–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, G.W.; Lu, M. Dual hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Arch. Control Sci. 2017, 27, 365–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, X.Y.; Wei, G.W. Models for green supplier selection in green supply chain management with Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic information. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 18042–18060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, G.W.; Lu, M.; Tang, X.Y.; Wei, Y. Pythagorean Hesitant Fuzzy Hamacher Aggregation Operators and Their Application to Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2018, 33, 1197–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, G.W.; Lu, M. Pythagorean Fuzzy Maclaurin Symmetric Mean Operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2018, 33, 1043–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, G.W. Pythagorean fuzzy interaction aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2017, 33, 2119–2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, G.W.; Lu, M.; Alsaadi, F.E.; Hayat, T.; Alsaedi, A. Pythagorean 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2017, 33, 1129–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, M.; Wei, G.W.; Alsaadi, F.E.; Hayat, T.; Alsaedi, A. Hesitant pythagorean fuzzy hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2017, 33, 1105–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, S.J.; Wei, G.W. Pythagorean fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Int. J. Knowl.-Based Intell. Eng. Syst. 2017, 21, 189–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, M.; Wei, G.W. Pythagorean uncertain linguistic aggregation operators for multiple attribute decision making. Int. J. Knowl.-Based Intell. Eng. Syst. 2017, 21, 165–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonferroni, C. Sulle medie multiple di potenze. Bollettino Dell’unione Matematica Italiana 1950, 5, 267–270. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, B.; Xu, Z.S.; Xia, M.M. Hesitant fuzzy geometric Bonferroni means. Inf. Sci. 2012, 205, 72–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, X.P.; Wei, G.W. Some Bonferroni mean operators with 2-tuple linguistic information and their application to multiple attribute decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2014, 27, 2153–2162. [Google Scholar]
- Wei, G.W.; Zhao, X.F.; Lin, R.; Wang, H.J. Uncertain linguistic Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Appl. Math. Model. 2013, 37, 5277–5285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, C.; Ye, J.; Hu, K.; Fan, E. Bonferroni Mean Operators of Linguistic Neutrosophic Numbers and Their Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making Methods. Information 2017, 8, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, P.; Chen, S.; Liu, J. Multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy interaction partitioned Bonferroni mean operators. Inf. Sci. 2017, 411, 98–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beliakov, G.; Pradera, A.; Calvo, T. Aggregation Functions: A Guide for Practitioners; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, D.J. Intuitionistic fuzzy geometric Heronian mean aggregation operators. Appl. Soft Comput. 2012, 13, 1235–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.D.; Zhu, J.J.; Liu, G.D.; Hao, J.J. A multiple attribute decision making method based on uncertain linguistic Heronian mean. Math. Probl. Eng. 2013, 2013, 597671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, P.D.; Liu, Z.M.; Zhang, X. Some intuitionistic uncertain linguistic Heronian mean operators and their application to group decision making. Appl. Math. Comput. 2014, 230, 570–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, S.M.; Zhou, H.; Chen, X.H.; Wang, J.Q. A multi-criteria decision-making method based on Heronian mean operators under a linguistic hesitant fuzzy environment. Asia-Pac. J. Oper. Res. 2015, 32, 1550035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, Y.C.; Liu, P.D. Some two-dimensional uncertain linguistic Heronian mean operators and their application in multiple-attribute decision making. Neural Comput. Appl. 2015, 26, 1461–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muirhead, R.F. Some methods applicable to identities and inequalities of symmetric algebraic functions of letters. Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. 1902, 21, 144–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maclaurin, C. A second letter to Martin Folkes, Esq.; concerning the roots of equations, with demonstration of other rules of algebra. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 1729, 36, 59–96. [Google Scholar]
- Wei, G.W. Picture uncertain linguistic Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Kybernetes 2017, 46, 1777–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, G.; Wei, Y. Some single-valued neutrosophic dombi prioritized weighted aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2018, 35, 2001–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De, S.K.; Sana, S.S. A multi-periods production-inventory model with capacity constraints for multi-manufacturers-A global optimality in intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Appl. Math. Comput. 2014, 242, 825–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, X.M.; Wei, G.W.; Gao, H.; Wang, J. Models for safety assessment of construction project with some 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy Bonferroni mean operators. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 52105–52137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.H.; Wei, G.W. TODIM Method for Pythagorean 2-tuple Linguistic Multiple Attribute Decision Making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2018, 35, 901–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, G.W.; Gao, H.; Wang, J.; Huang, Y.H. Research on Risk Evaluation of Enterprise Human Capital Investment with Interval-valued bipolar 2-tuple linguistic Information. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 35697–35712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, H.; Lu, M.; Wei, G.W.; Wei, Y. Some novel Pythagorean fuzzy interaction aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Fundam. Inform. 2018, 159, 385–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, G.W.; Gao, H.; Wei, Y. Some q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Heronian Mean Operators in Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2018, 33, 1426–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deli, I.; Çagman, N. Intuitionistic fuzzy parameterized soft set theory and its decision making. Appl. Soft Comput. 2015, 28, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gao, H.; Wei, G.W.; Huang, Y.H. Dual hesitant bipolar fuzzy Hamacher prioritized aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 11508–11522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, G.W.; Gao, H. The generalized Dice similarity measures for picture fuzzy sets and their applications. Informatica 2018, 29, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, T.-Y. The inclusion-based TOPSIS method with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets for multiple criteria group decision making. Appl. Soft Comput. 2015, 26, 57–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, G.W. Some cosine similarity measures for picture fuzzy sets and their applications to strategic decision making. Informatica 2017, 28, 547–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.-Q.; Nie, R.-R.; Zhang, H.-Y.; Chen, X.-H. Intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method based on evidential reasoning. Appl. Soft Comput. 2013, 13, 1823–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yue, Z.; Jia, Y. A method to aggregate crisp values into interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information for group decision making. Appl. Soft Comput. 2013, 13, 2304–2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Wei, G.W.; Wei, Y. Models for Green Supplier Selection with Some 2-Tuple Linguistic Neutrosophic Number Bonferroni Mean Operators. Symmetry 2018, 10, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, S.; Wang, J.; Wei, G.; Wei, Y. Research on Construction Engineering Project Risk Assessment with Some 2-Tuple Linguistic Neutrosophic Hamy Mean Operators. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Tao, Z.F.; Chen, H.Y.; Zhou, L.G. A MAGDM method Based on 2-tuple linguistic Heronian mean and new operational laws. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzzy Knowl.-Based Syst. 2016, 24, 593–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, Y.H.; Liu, P.D.; Chen, Y.B. Some single valued neutrosophic number Heronian mean operators and their application in multiple attribute group decision making. Informatica 2016, 27, 85–110. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, T.Y.; Li, C.H. Determining objective weights with intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measures: A comparative analysis. Inf. Sci. 2010, 180, 4207–4222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merigó, J.M.; Gil-Lafuente, A.M. Induced 2-tuple linguistic generalized aggregation operators and their application in decision-making. Inf. Sci. 2013, 236, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, G.W. Some similarity measures for picture fuzzy sets and their applications. Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. 2018, 15, 77–89. [Google Scholar]
- Merigo, J.M.; Gil-Lafuente, A.M. Fuzzy induced generalized aggregation operators and its application in multi-person decision making. Exp. Syst. Appl. 2011, 38, 9761–9772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Wei, G.; Lu, M. An Extended VIKOR Method for Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making with Triangular Fuzzy Neutrosophic Numbers. Symmetry 2018, 10, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Wei, G.; Gao, H. Approaches to Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Interval-Valued 2-Tuple Linguistic Pythagorean Fuzzy Information. Mathematics 2018, 6, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, G.W. TODIM method for picture fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Informatica 2018, 29, 555–566. [Google Scholar]
- Kuo, M.S.; Liang, G.S. A soft computing method of performance evaluation with MCDM based on interval-valued fuzzy numbers. Appl. Soft Comput. 2012, 12, 476–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Wei, G.; Lu, M. TODIM Method for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making under 2-Tuple Linguistic Neutrosophic Environment. Symmetry 2018, 10, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, J.Q.; Liu, X.W. 2-tuple linguistic Muirhead mean operators for multiple attribute group decision making and its application to supplier selection. Kybernetes 2017, 45, 2–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, H. Pythagorean Fuzzy Hamacher Prioritized Aggregation Operators in Multiple Attribute Decision Making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2018, 35, 2229–2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, Y.; Liu, J.; Lai, X.; Hu, Y. Which determinant is the most informative in forecasting crude oil market volatility: Fundamental, speculation, or uncertainty? Energy Econ. 2017, 68, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, Y.; Yu, Q.; Liu, J.; Cao, Y. Hot money and China’s stock market volatility: Further evidence using the GARCH-MIDAS model. Phys. A 2018, 492, 923–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
E1 | ([0.10,0.40] [0.20,0.50]) | ([0.50,0.60] [0.20,0.30]) | ([0.30,0.40] [0.30,0.50]) | ([0.40,0.50] [0.20,0.30]) |
E2 | ([0.50,0.60] [0.10,0.30]) | ([0.50,0.60] [0.10,0.30]) | ([0.50,0.70] [0.20,0.30]) | ([0.60,0.70] [0.40,0.60]) |
E3 | ([0.60,0.70] [0.20,0.40]) | ([0.20,0.30] [0.70,0.80]) | ([0.50,0.60] [0.10,0.20]) | ([0.20,0.50] [0.20,0.30]) |
E4 | ([0.30,0.70] [0.20,0.30]) | ([0.30,0.70] [0.10,0.20]) | ([0.20,0.50] [0.40,0.60]) | ([0.50,0.80] [0.30,0.70]) |
E1 | E2 | E3 | E4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
IVPFHM | ([0.2428,0.6315] [0.2261,0.4068]) | ([0.4490,0.7434] [0.1259,0.2769]) | ([0.2655,0.6007] [0.2310,0.3588]) | ([0.3201,0.6608] [0.1788,0.3062]) |
IVPFWHM | ([0.2421,0.8608] [0.2317,0.4138]) | ([0.4599,0.9083] [0.1318,0.2813]) | ([0.2765,0.8403] [0.2317,0.3578]) | ([0.3056,0.8760] [0.1726,0.2937]) |
IVPFDHM | ([0.2598,0.4798] [0.2237,0.5395]) | ([0.4566,0.5856] [0.1225,0.3802]) | ([0.2790,0.4590] [0.2168,0.4742]) | ([0.3315,0.5039] [0.1687,0.4051]) |
IVPFWDHM | ([0.2542,0.4787] [0.2281,0.8080]) | ([0.4650,0.5997] [0.1265,0.7055]) | ([0.2982,0.4644] [0.2121,0.7729]) | ([0.3156,0.4967] [0.1657,0.7286]) |
E1 | E2 | E3 | E4 | Order | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVPFHM | 0.5603 | 0.6654 | 0.5623 | 0.6033 | E2 > E4 > E3 > E1 |
IVPFWHM | 0.6436 | 0.7352 | 0.6514 | 0.6862 | E2 > E4 > E3 > E1 |
IVPFDHM | 0.4891 | 0.5980 | 0.5042 | 0.5428 | E2 > E4 > E3 > E1 |
IVPFWDHM | 0.3972 | 0.5155 | 0.4156 | 0.4470 | E2 > E4 > E3 > E1 |
Scores | Order | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E1 | E2 | E3 | E4 | ||
0.5259 | 0.6225 | 0.5475 | 0.5654 | E2 > E4 > E3 > E1 | |
0.6436 | 0.7352 | 0.6514 | 0.6962 | E2 > E4 > E3 > E1 | |
0.5115 | 0.6006 | 0.5170 | 0.5521 | E2 > E4 > E3 > E1 | |
0.5079 | 0.6101 | 0.5144 | 0.5473 | E2 > E4 > E3 > E1 |
Scores | Order | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E1 | E2 | E3 | E4 | ||
0.5079 | 0.6101 | 0.5158 | 0.5473 | E2 > E4 > E3 > E1 | |
0.3972 | 0.5155 | 0.4156 | 0.4470 | E2 > E4 > E3 > E1 | |
0.5236 | 0.6226 | 0.5464 | 0.5620 | E2 > E4 > E3 > E1 | |
0.5259 | 0.6244 | 0.5578 | 0.5661 | E2 > E4 > E3 > E1 |
IVPFWA | IVPFWG | |
---|---|---|
E1 | ([0.2939,0.4896], [0.2083,0.3680]) | ([0.2232,0.4732], [0.2124,0.3971]) |
E2 | ([0.4355,0.5500], [0.1072,0.2551]) | ([0.4076,0.5181], [0.1142,0.2652]) |
E3 | ([0.2518,0.4540], [0.2144,0.3478]) | ([0.3192,0.4300], [0.2498,0.3751]) |
E4 | ([0.3914,0.5291], [0.1663,0.3005]) | ([0.3534,0.5144], [0.2139,0.3673]) |
IVPFWA | IVPFWG | |
---|---|---|
E1 | 0.5368 | 0.5180 |
E2 | 0.6039 | 0.5878 |
E3 | 0.5257 | 0.5074 |
E4 | 0.5788 | 0.5522 |
Order | |
---|---|
IVPFWA | E2 > E4 > E1 > E3 |
IVPFWG | E2 > E4 > E1 > E3 |
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Li, Z.; Wei, G.; Gao, H. Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Information. Mathematics 2018, 6, 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6110228
Li Z, Wei G, Gao H. Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Information. Mathematics. 2018; 6(11):228. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6110228
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Zengxian, Guiwu Wei, and Hui Gao. 2018. "Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Information" Mathematics 6, no. 11: 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6110228
APA StyleLi, Z., Wei, G., & Gao, H. (2018). Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Information. Mathematics, 6(11), 228. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6110228